User talk:Lewis Hulbert/Archive/2014
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
■ 2013
■ 2014
■ 2015
■ 2016
■ 2017
■ 2018
■ 2019
■ |
Thanks
Thanks for nominating my picture of Odiham Castle for Quality images (and for supporting it for Featured picture on en:wp). If the picture succeeds it will perhaps encourage me to consider nominating some other good pictures that I've taken. BabelStone (talk) 12:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Luke's church, Abercarn, Wales. N-W side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Featured Pictures
Hi Lewis, I'm not experienced in the Featured Picture process on Commons, but have you considered putting up File:Church of All Saints, Odiham 1.JPG for consideration? Nev1 (talk) 19:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I have already nominated it once. It got a decent amount of support, but not enough for promotion. The discussion was here. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, and out of curiosity: How did you come across that image? Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Your comments actually made me decide to renominate since it was actually such a close call last time. (I'm leaving far too many replies to this) -- Lewis Hulbert (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- I was poking around the uploads for Wiki Loves Monuments and your photo caught my eye. As it's a FP on Wikipedia it must be worth consideration on Commons. I didn't go the extra step of checking whether it had been nominated before. I'll chip in my vote now and fingers crossed for a different outcome. Nev1 (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! -- Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- I was poking around the uploads for Wiki Loves Monuments and your photo caught my eye. As it's a FP on Wikipedia it must be worth consideration on Commons. I didn't go the extra step of checking whether it had been nominated before. I'll chip in my vote now and fingers crossed for a different outcome. Nev1 (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Your comments actually made me decide to renominate since it was actually such a close call last time. (I'm leaving far too many replies to this) -- Lewis Hulbert (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, and out of curiosity: How did you come across that image? Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Memorial bench at Horseshoe Lake.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! FAST Cody Pavilion.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Church of All Saints, Odiham 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of All Saints, Odiham 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Nev1 (talk) 18:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- And thank you for giving me the idea to renominate it! Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Horseshoe Lake, Yateley Complex.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RAF Cardington airship hangars, Bedfordshire, England. S-W side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Mary's Church, Eversley, England. S-E side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brick building with signs, FAST.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wellington Statue, Aldershot, England. S-E side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'm assuming the large amount of category edits I did earlier today is what brought this on. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wellington Statue, Aldershot front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Horseshoe Lake Activity Centre, Yateley Complex.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Two postboxes in Hartley Wintney.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Building G1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Our Lady of Peace Church, Newbridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! All Saints Church, Fleet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/2014⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Lewis, is it OK when I upload a version with removed barrel distortion? Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 21:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it would be fine. Thanks! Lewis Hulbert (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Done. If you don't like it please revert. Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Our Lady of Peace Church, Newbridge and attached presbytery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St. Laurence, Seale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Building Q120.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Building Q121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Laurence, Seale north-east view.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seale Chalk Pit 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corvus monedula on grass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seale Chalk Pit 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seale Chalk Pit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of Peace, Newbridge front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Lewis Hulbert/Archive,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St. Laurence, Seale front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Mary the Virgin, Beech Hill.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Two K6 phone kiosks in Hartley Wintney.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odiham Castle, south side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge over the River Loddon, Stratfield Saye Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sherfield on Loddon annulus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! All Saints Church, Dogmersfield south-east view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Barbara's Garrison Church, Deepcut.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Peter's Church, Frimley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church, Hawley from the road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St. Mary the Virgin, Stratfield Saye.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Simon Gipps-Kent image
As per your communication, an explanation will follow in due time (time difference). Trezjr (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Still waiting. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Immaculate Conception Catholic Church, Sandhurst.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sculpture outside Immaculate Conception Catholic Church, Sandhurst.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cartshed at Lodge Farm, Hartley Wintney.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Peter's Church, Farnborough from the road.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Strawberries is cool. Axxdena911 (talk) 17:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC) |
- Thank you! --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The O2, Greenwich, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Mary at Elvetham Hall, Hartley Wintney.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The Hop Blossom, Farnham.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Farnham Methodist Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Delete photos of Smiley
Hi Lewis Hulbert, for what delete my pictures of smiley... No speak inglish... bye... Boys Over Flowers... (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello Lewis Hulbert please no delete + photos what I and make please...
Bye... 
- Please read this: Commons:Project_scope/es. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for thanking me.
You're awesome. :D
DunDunDunt (talk) 01:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Michael and St Mary Magdalene's Church, Easthampstead.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brookwood Czechoslovakia Military Cemetery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stained glass window in St Nicholas's Church, Compton 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Gabriel's Church, Popley, Basingstoke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yateley War Memorial 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yateley School.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yateley War Memorial.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Mary the Virgin, Beech Hill from the road.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Holy Trinity Church, Hawley from the road.jpg is an excellent picture, can I convince you to nominate it as a Valued Image? Nev1 (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Nev1: You can, and you have! I have just nominated it now. I probably have a few more images that could be VIs but I never get around to nominating them. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Marvellous :-) Hopefully there'll be a steady stream of UK photos at Valued Image Candidates – we've got a long way to catch up with France which has thousands of them! Nev1 (talk) 17:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Michael Rosen recording Listening Lions (17) (14310753767).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 19:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- I intentionally didn't notify myself because it was my own upload. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity Church, Hawley, England (exterior) NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
StarFox 64 screenshot
Would it be possible for me to change the license, or should I re-upload?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinium (talk • contribs) 00:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- No, it is a copyright violation. You don't own the (c) to the graphics and fair use is not allowed on Commons. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations, Dear Reviewer
Hi Lewis Hulbert, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:
- importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
- importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.
You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! FDMS 4 01:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HMS Warrior 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pterois volitans 400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Pterois volitans 400.jpg and QI updates
Hi. Sorry for opposing due to zombie pixels after you'd fixed them. In future could you please leave a message along the lines of {{Done}} once you've corrected issues reviewers have identified? It makes life a bit easier. Thanks! -mattbuck (Talk) 09:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- No worries, it's my fault. I usually leave a message but I'm not sure why I forgot in this case. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portsmouth Cathedral 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge over the River Wey, Tilford (north east side of green).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Farnham Castle keep.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Square Tower, Portsmouth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
_2.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge over the River Wey, Tilford (north east side of green) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued image candidate?
File:Farnham Castle keep.jpg must easily be Commons' best picture of Farnham Castle's keep. I see it's already a Quality Image candidate, can I convince you to nominate it as a Valued Image as well? Nev1 (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for suggesting that I nominate it. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farnham Castle keep, Surrey, England (exterior) South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Geranoaetus melanoleucus, Hawk Conservancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Michael's Church, Basingstoke.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St John the Baptist, Puttenham, Surrey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Michael, Camberley.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stained glass window, St Bartholomew's Church, Wanborough 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Mary's Church, Norney, Shackleford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Mark, Binfield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014
I see you added images (e.g. File:Reflections at St Pancras Railway Station.jpg) to both Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2014 and Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014. Only the former is required as it is a sub-category of the other. -- Colin (talk) 14:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Colin: It does seem strange, but it was done that way last year too. Maybe it should've never been done like that, but I'm only doing it the same way as it was done last year (and as how Richard Nevell (WMUK) was doing it before I joined in) --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- See COM:OVERCAT. I think you are just making work for yourself (and for someone else should they decide to eliminate the duplication). -- Colin (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- When I started out, the images had categories for both. There is a little bit of overcategorisation for WLM, so Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 has all 107,000 images so far and they also have categories for the countries. I assumed the QI categorisations followed the same pattern but at the moment only the UK and Ukraine seem to have those subcategories. I don't have strong feeling either way as if you want to know a headline figure such as how many Quality Images there are from a particular edition of WLM you can run CatScan or GLAMorous. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- If anything, I don't really believe there needs to be a "Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014" category, since it can easily be found out using the suggestions by Richard Nevell and most countries seem to do fine without them. There seems to be lots of redundancy in hidden categories wherever I look, I was never sure if COM:OVERCAT didn't apply to hidden categories or if just nobody cares. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- When I started out, the images had categories for both. There is a little bit of overcategorisation for WLM, so Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 has all 107,000 images so far and they also have categories for the countries. I assumed the QI categorisations followed the same pattern but at the moment only the UK and Ukraine seem to have those subcategories. I don't have strong feeling either way as if you want to know a headline figure such as how many Quality Images there are from a particular edition of WLM you can run CatScan or GLAMorous. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- See COM:OVERCAT. I think you are just making work for yourself (and for someone else should they decide to eliminate the duplication). -- Colin (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Quality image???
Hi. Many thanks for letting me know that there is a system for doing this! It does, however beg the question: how on earth did [[File:Windsor MMB 03 King George V Memorial Fountain.jpg]] receive a quality image badge?!! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 15:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- It might be an uninteresting shot, but images don't have to be impressive or eye catching for quality image status. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stained glass window, St Bartholomew's Church, Wanborough 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Bartholomew, Wanborough behind gate.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Martin, Ellisfield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portsmouth Garrison Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapel of the Holy Ghost, Basingstoke.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rosedene, Eversley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portsmouth Cathedral, Hampshire, England (exterior) South side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St Tarcisius, Camberley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Have you considered nominating this one as a Valued Image? Nev1 (talk) 23:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of St. Mary, Herriard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Have you considered nominating this as a Valued Image? Nev1 (talk) 21:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portsmouth Cathedral 2014 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_(14310753767).jpg){kind=link}
_(14310753767).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14310753767).jpg){kind=link}
_(14310753767).jpg){kind=link}
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Mary the Virgin, Herriard, England. NE view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Andrew's Church, Frimley Green.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|