User talk:Lewis Hulbert/Archive/2015

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Lewis Hulbert. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hen Eglwys, Margam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please clone out the blurry bird. --Cccefalon 05:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)  Done --Lewis Hulbert 12:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)  Support Fine. --Palauenc05 07:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter's Church, Goytre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Constitutional Club, Neath.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. maybe a tighter crop? --ArildV 12:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivy Cottage, Margam Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross Church, Port Talbot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 07:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James' Church, Barkham.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Contrast may be better. I'm still looking for verticals ... ;-) --XRay 15:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St Michael, Cwmavon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Windows10Logo.png

File:Windows10Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 HPD   ^talk  11:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary's Church, Ewshot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 16:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary's Church, Upton Grey 2015-08-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary's Church, Mapledurwell 2015-08-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:20, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southsea Castle, Southsea.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farnham Castle 0077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/--Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC)