User talk:Kirchenfan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kirchenfan!

-- 14:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Danke...[edit]

...für die schönen Bilder (und die Postkarten)! - Eine Bitte: Bei den kath. Kirchen immer auch die Diözesankategorie dazusetzen, also Category:Churches in Diocese of Hildesheim, Category:Churches in Diocese of Osnabrück etc., bei den evang. Category:Churches of Evangelisch-Lutherische Landeskirche Hannovers, Category:Churches of Evangelisch-Lutherische Landeskirche in Braunschweig etc. Herzlichen Gruß, --Rabanus Flavus (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wolfsburg Kirche Christophorus 2009.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wolfsburg Kirche Christophorus 2009.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Wolfsburg Kirche Christophorus 2009.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Für die Bilder der Josefskirche in Herzberg! Aarp65 (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove the license, you cannot revoke a CC license. Jcb (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die Fotos aus Detmerode, bin auf weitere Fotos vom gleichen Standort gespannt File:Abriss Stufenhochhaus WOB-Detmerode.jpg, um wenigstens etwas der einstigen Architektur überliefert zu haben .... Gruß --Erfurth (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für deine Nachricht. Ein paar weitere Fotos von Detmerode habe ich noch, werde sie gelegentlich auch noch einstellen. Ich will auch mal versuchen, während des Abrisses noch ein paar Fotos zu machen. Ein Foto vom Detmeroder Teich wäre übrigens für Wikipedia auch nicht schlecht. Viele Grüße, --Kirchenfan (talk) 12:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Da, ein Foto![edit]

--GeorgDerReisende (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Na super, vielen Dank! Und auch noch so schön geworden! --Kirchenfan (talk) 18:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Maerklin VW Variant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arosio Stefano (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schuco Opel Ascona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arosio Stefano (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schuco Audi 80 1-43.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arosio Stefano (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yatming Maserati Bora.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arosio Stefano (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yatming Nissan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arosio Stefano (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Arosio Stefano (talk) 07:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Arosio Stefano (talk) 07:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ihr könnt meine Fotos gern löschen wenn ihr meint daß es mit dem Urheberrecht Probleme geben könnte. --Kirchenfan (talk) 13:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wolfsburg Elisabeth innen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hahnenklee Maria Schnee Orgel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gifhorn Altfrid innen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dungelbeck Kreuzkirche innen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Tomica Mazda Familia.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Carl Hahn junior has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


78.152.250.236 22:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oebisfelde: Braunstichiges Farbfoto der DDR-Grenze bei Oebisfelde um 1978 mit Turm der St.-Katharinen-Kirche mittels Grautönen überarbeitet.[edit]

Hallo Kirchenfan, diese Probleme mit älteren braunstichigen Farbfotos habe ich übrigens auch. Deshalb habe ich eine Überarbeitung mit Grautönen vorgenommen. Damit wurde auch der Kontrast leicht verbessert und außerdem passt das Foto nun auch besser zum dem Foto von 1970 darüber. Im Übrigen finde ich, dass Dein Foto historisch aussagekräftig ist und gut zum Artikel passt. Herzliche Grüße Mabit1 (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Datenbank Kirchenbaue[edit]

Hallo Kirchenfan, ich hoffe dein Name ist Programm ;-) Deswegen mal eine Frage, zu einem Problem, das ich schon einige Male hatte. Ich versuchte den Ort eines Kirchenbaus anhand eines Fotos zu identifizieren. Hat man keine nähere örtliche Eingrenzung, dass ist schnell auf Grund der schieren Zahl der Kirche überfordert. In dem Moment dachte ich, dass es sehr hilfreich wäre, wenn ich Kirchenbaue anhand von bestimmten Merkmalen filtern könnte. Leider konnte ich dazu im "Weltnetz" nicht finden. Hast du vielleicht eine Idee, ob es sowas doch (vielleicht auch in der Literatur) gibt? Im Prinzip wäre für mich auch so etwas wie eine sinnvolle Systematik interessant nach der man die Bau einteilen kann. Vielleicht kann man ja Wikidata damit anreichern und darüber die Abfragen dann machen. Vielen Dank und schönen Abend, --Arnd (talk) 16:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Na das ist eine gute Frage. Wenn du weder den Namen der Kirche noch die Ortschaft, in der sie steht, kennst, wird es schwierig, sie zu indentifizieren. Vermutlich gibt es Programme, vielleicht mit Künstlicher Intelligenz, die im Internet Kirchenfotos mit bestimmten Merkmalen herausfiltern können. Da mußt du aber einen IT-Experten fragen, der bin ich nicht. Tut mir leid. --Kirchenfan (talk) 16:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Treppenspeicher in Günne bei Bokel[edit]

Hallo Kirchenfan, danke für deine tollen Fotos zum Treppenspeicher. Ich wollte dieses Denkmal in der OpenStreetMap genauer zuordnen und möchte dich bitten, sofern dir das möglich ist, den genauen Standort mitzuteilen. Für deine Mühe im Voraus vielen Dank! Mit freundlichen Grüßen Werner Bwbuz (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Werner, danke. Freut mich, daß dir die Fotos gefallen. Ich habe mir auch Mühe damit gegeben ;-) Die Koordinaten sind NS=52.80995 EW=10.52202. Viele Grüße, --Kirchenfan (talk) 17:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Meinen herzlichen Dank und dir ein schönes Wochenende! Viele Grüße Werner Bwbuz (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte löschen Sie das Bild zur Evangelisch-Lutherische Brüdergemeinde in Gifhorn. Es ist nicht erwünscht das dieses im Internet auftaucht Helmit123 (talk) 20:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Nicht erwünscht" ist kein Löschgrund. Die Veröffentlichung des Fotos ist durch die de:Panoramafreiheit und durch das nicht vorhandene de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache gedeckt. --Achim55 (talk) 21:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mit ist es egal, ob das Foto gelöscht wird oder nicht, aber über die Löschung kann nicht ich, sondern nur die zuständigen Personen von Wikimedia Commons entscheiden. --Kirchenfan (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Gifhorn Ev Luth Brüder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]