User talk:JurgenNL/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Some stroopwafels for you!

You want Stroopwafel? Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yummie! Stroopwafels! JurgenNL (talk) 17:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nederlandse uitspraakbestanden

Hoi Jurgen,

Bedankt voor de hernoemingen! [1] & [2]

Is er misschien een specifieke reden dat je hebt hernoemd naar .oga in plaats van naar .ogg? Het standaardformaat dat op dit moment voor de uitspraakbestanden wordt gebruikt is .ogg, zoals je ook in Category:Dutch pronunciation kunt zien. De wiktionaries die gebruik maken van deze bestanden gaan er ook vanuit dat het formaat .ogg is, zodat automatische verwerking mogelijk is. (Zodra er bij Commons een uitspraakbestand is in het standaardformaat Nl-XYZ.ogg wordt dit bij WikiWoordenboek automatisch op pagina XYZ weergegeven.)

Zou je daarom de bestanden File:Nl-aeronautisch.oga & File:Nl-aaiden.oga kunnen hernoemen naar .ogg? Alvast bedankt! -- 2Curious (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi 2Curious, geen idee hoe dat is gekomen, ik vermoed dat de software dit zo heeft gedaan. Als ik hem nu opnieuw wil hernoemen, krijg ik de melding dat het bestand al bestaat... Ik heb het {{Rename}}-sjabloon dus opnieuw erop gezet, dan kan een moderator het doen. JurgenNL (talk) 05:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Het lijkt er inderdaad op dat de software het gedaan heeft [3].
Bedankt voor je hulp! -- 2Curious (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Ahhhhhh.

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Awh! Can I keep it? JurgenNL (talk) 13:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For the help with renaming a file - much appreciated! Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! JurgenNL (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernst-Ehwald-1971.jpg

danke, das war schnell! Maximilian (talk) 14:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
A very BIG thank you for renaming the images ! Sincerely, Hoikka1 (talk) 10:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! JurgenNL (talk) 10:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! JurgenNL (talk) 16:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons

I see that you've declined many of my name-change requests due to a lack of rationale. Haven't I already cited the relevant Criteria? Aren't reasons only additional? Well, according to the script, that is. Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble11:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did requests for e.g. adding a space and an uppercase letter as being "misleading" or "obvious errors", what is wrong. See also COM:FR. JurgenNL (talk) 11:52, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this image above now has a verifiable source by Serdechny. If you can verify the source, please mark it as I don't mark many images in license review.

Unfortunately, this other image by Serdechny has no online source. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


PS: Some images in this Category with 800+KB sizes like this appear to have a PD/CC 0 license. However, I don't know how to mark it. Perhaps, you or Lymantria know how to mark them? I usually mark flickr, panoramio, indafoto and picasa images. As for me, I will be signing now as its almost 1:00 AM in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Checked and reviewed - JurgenNL (talk) 14:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Madame Tussauds Deletions

I didn't know that wax figures of New York, Kas Vegas and Hollywood weren't free. But you shouldn't delete this because are in London: --SunOfErat (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SunOfErat, these images are nominated by Natuur12. I will ask him to cancel the requests for photographs made in London. Regards, JurgenNL (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do so. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you (and sorry)--SunOfErat (talk) 16:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prettige Kerst!

Dag JurgenNL, only me again... Weet U of het de bedoeling is de afbeeldingen uit deze category waar mogelijk onder te brengen bij Category:Politicians of Belgium by name, of by party? Lotje (talk) 06:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Lotje, da's een goeie... Ikzelf doe het altijd by party, zoals bij File:Marc Hendrickx.jpg. Groet, JurgenNL (talk) 14:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image

la ringrazio per il seguente avviso,, solo che il programma di flirck che mi hai consigliato,, non riesco a capirlo bene,, perchè è tutto in inglese :)

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish/Italian (or what is it)... Can you please talk English? JurgenNL (talk) 12:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jurgen,

This is *my* photo, which I took myself. I specified as much when I uploaded it. It may not be available on Flickr under a permissive license (primarily because under Flickr's new UI, I couldn't find the option to change it), but by uploading it, I licensed it permissively as part of the Commons.

If you have a handy step-by-step guide to how to navigate Flickr's new byzantine UI and change a photo's individual licensing options, I'll cheerfully change it, but that is not remotely the point Nevalicori (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nevalicori, I don't have the new Flickr UI, so I'm afraid I can't help you. Maybe you can ask help at the Flickr forum? After changing the license, you can ask undeletion at COM:UNDEL. JurgenNL (talk) 21:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suddenly, there are many images in Panoramio to review today. Maybe you can mark some? Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look later today! :) JurgenNL (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Doing… - JurgenNL (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done - JurgenNL (talk) 10:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License check request

Could you please do the license check for the following files
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kompolksmotr.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kompolksmotr2.jpg
Thanks in advance --RussianTrooper (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. In the future, it's enough to add the license template at the file page; a reviewer will review it in a while.

Can you mark my file? Its on a cc by sa 3.0 license since Commons doesn't give a cc by sa 2.0 option for own work. I can't mark my own image. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank You. I have to sign off now as its 1:31 AM in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Anyway, I'm hoping someone at Graphic Lab's can help improve the image. That's why I needed it marked. I had to use a flash here as the object was in a dark area of the museum. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I will try to remove the flash. It's 10.33 AM here, so I have time enough. Regards, JurgenNL (talk) 09:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Sword images

Hi there. Some images I recently uploaded (list below) have been marked for speedy deletion. The original copyright holder of these images has given me express written permission to use the photos on Wikipedia, as they did not want to change the licensing on Flickr, so I thought the attribution template would cover this. Can you help me mark these images correctly please? Any help would be much appreciated.

Kind regards. Andre666 (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See here. JurgenNL (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Station Lysvik

Hallo Jurgen,

Vanochtend heb jij een foto die ik heb geupload van Station Lysvik verwijderd (File:Lysvik trainstation.JPG). Ik dacht dat deze foto de goede licnetie had, maar dat blijkt dus niet zo te zijn. Hoe kan ik op Flickr zien of een foto wél voldoed aan de eisen? Groet, Iceandsnow (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Iceandsnow, door de nieuwe layout van Flickr gaat het een stuk omslachtiger. Voorheen stond het duidelijk onder de afbeelding, nu moet je een paar keer extra klikken. Als voorbeeld deze foto: rechts van de afbeelding staat een grijze balk. Daar staat nu alleen "Some rights reserved", in plaats van welke licentie er is opgegeven. Om achter de licentie te komen, klik je op de drie witte bolletjes naast elkaar (rechts van de ster, een tekstballon en een vierkantje met een pijl). Als je hier klikt op "Download / all sizes", staat bovenaan de pagina die nu opent de opgegeven licentie. In dit geval is het cc-by-sa (2.0). Soms staat er een dollarteken met een streep erdoorheen (), zoals hier. Dat betekent dat de foto niet commercieel gebruikt mag worden, dus die is niet geschikt voor Commons. Alle afbeeldingen die de cc-by () of cc-by-sa ( ) kunnen geüpload worden op Commons. Voor afbeeldingen die niet bewerkt worden is de Flickr Upload Bot ook een handige uitkomst. Deze checkt de licentie automatisch. Met vriendelijke groet, JurgenNL (talk) 09:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hartelijk bedankt, hier kan ik mee aan de slag. Groet, Iceandsnow (talk) 09:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

Hardcore Angel's Patroller Barnstar
Great work clearing the unpatrolled edits backlog. Keep it up! There's still a long way to go... Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thanks! JurgenNL (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

JurgenNL, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proficiat! Trijnsteltalk 13:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yo yo yo! Congratulations! JianhuiMobile (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks all! :) JurgenNL (talk) 08:19, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I do not understand why that file has been deleted. The author of the picture released it under the following license:

Gaza 2009 Project by Marius Arnesen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Norway License.

It also has the same author and uses the same license as this one:File:Smuggling Tunnel.jpg.

Please explain that to me.

Kind regards,

-- Muruj (talk) 07:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muruj, I just looked to the license what was given on Flickr instead of the file description. That is cc-by-nc 2.0 and is not supported. I undeleted the file and changed the license. Regards, JurgenNL (talk) 07:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! -- Muruj (talk) 07:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jurgen! You started to close deletion requests and I like it. But in mentioned request you did not decide anything on file, which I added to request. Please decide something over the file also. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I didn't see that one. I looked to it and deleted it. Thanks for your message! JurgenNL (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its a very strange that this category can have 0 images and then 22+ images in just a few hours. I marked a few here but I also marked other flickr and panoramio images. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion?

You removed https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Clarion_Number_16.jpg, which I own the copyright on and released under CC license. What's the situation?--Civilizeme (talk) 13:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I only deleted the talk page because it was orphaned. Please send an e-mail to OTRS for the permission. JurgenNL (talk) 13:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Thank you for the clarification.) For permission to do what? I am the one *giving* the permission. --Civilizeme (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If it isn't clear that the uploader is the copyright holder, permission via OTRS is needed. See the page for more info. JurgenNL (talk) 14:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mudah.my Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

175.139.24.156 06:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider marking some flickr images if you have a few minutes. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now doing some DR's, but I will mark some Flickr images when I'm done. Regards, JurgenNL (talk) 08:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockmaster

Hi Jurgen. I noticed this revert of yours. This is LTA sockmaster Wikinger. He's using open proxies to do his vandalism/stalking here. If you see the name in that revision I deleted (it's the personal info of an en.wiki admin) in any other edit summaries, please revert, revision delete, and block the IP for 1 year as an open proxy. Any other abusive edit summaries should be rev-del'd as well, and the IP blocked. If you see anything else like this, let me or another checkuser know. INeverCry 19:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi InverCry, thanks for the notice. I know Wikinger, but I wasn't sure this was him looking to the IP and crosswiki contributions and I didn't know this was personal info as well. JurgenNL (talk) 20:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you are an Admin now and have other tasks. But if you have a few minutes, please consider marking some of these images in the category above as some date to 2007 like this. I marked most of the flickr, picasa and panoramio images today. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning this file: what is the interest to keep this map with the 28? red dots corresponding to the location of 28 stores? This map will NEVER be used. Best regards. Cjp24 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cjp24, I kept the file since the reason given was "advertisement" but from the map it was not clear. I have just checked and there was an article removed on fr-wiki and the map only showed the location of 28 stores. I thus have reviewed my decision and deleted the file. My suggestion to you for a similar case next time is to elaborate so evaluation becomes easier. In this case the sentence "out of scope and used for a deleted article on a non relevant company on fr-wiki only" would have helped. Sincerely, JurgenNL (talk) 07:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Failed to connect problem?

this is just an example. Whenever I clicked on valued images, quality images, featured pictures, it shows as "failed to connect." Why? Is there a way to fix that? Thanks!Trongphu (talk) 06:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trongphu, I'm not known with this feature and don't get this error: it shows 'no results' here. Maybe you could ask in the Village pump. JurgenNL (talk) 07:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review some images?

If you have some time, please feel free to review this image or any images in this category If you have a bit of time. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leoboudv, last weeks I was very busy with patrolling the anonymous edits together with Jianhui67 and others. We started at 28000 and now we have reached 0. Now I am more available to review the licenses. Sincerely, JurgenNL (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terugplaatsen

Zodat je het niet vergeet :-). Deze graag. Dank! Grashoofd (talk) 14:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was ik het bijna vergeten ;). ✓ Done. JurgenNL (talk) 14:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci! Grashoofd (talk) 14:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you deleted this due to "no permission". At w:en:User_talk:Jmarnell#Thank_you the uploader says he was the photographer. May this file be undeleted so the license information may be filled in? Rybec (talk) 02:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't clear the uplaoder is the copyright holder. He or she has to send an e-mail to OTRS. JurgenNL (talk) 10:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Error nominating a file

Hi: Two days ago I started this deletion request. Sorry, it was an error. I can revert the authomatic editions linked with my nomination of this file, but I can't delete the request itself. Gerardo Ortiz was nominated in 2011 for a Grammy Award. I don't know if his article has enough relevance and I detected a more than possible SPU working in the article and uploading his picture. But now I think that picture does not deserve the deletion request. Not yet. (I've already reverted my deletion request of the article on Spanish Wikipedia). So, if you can, try to keep this file, at least by know. My decision was hasty, to say the least. Well, do what you think is more appropiate for this case. Thanks in advance. --Fixertool (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fixertool, I kept the file. JurgenNL (talk) 05:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Fixertool (talk) 01:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuwjaarsborrel Wikimedia Nederland bij het Nationaal Archief en de Koninklijke Bibliotheek. (12026184333).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ter-burg (talk) 10:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuwjaarsborrel Wikimedia Nederland bij het Nationaal Archief en de Koninklijke Bibliotheek. (12026264584).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ter-burg (talk) 10:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing my mistake on this file. Can you check if {{Indian navy}} also applies to File:Dhruv Commando extraction.jpg, File:Indian Navy continuity drill.jpg, File:India Navy continuity drill 1.jpg and perhaps other deleted contributions Chanakyathegreat? Thanks again! LX (talk, contribs) 13:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LX, I checked it together with Jcb and {{Indian navy}} applies to these images. I undeleted them and added the template. Sincerely, JurgenNL (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted files

Can you reinstate these 2 pictures please? The Organisation has given permission for them. William_Hague_Open_Europe.jpg George_Osborne_Open_Europe_speech.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris19231 (talk • contribs)

Please send an e-mail with the permission to OTRS. JurgenNL (talk) 14:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please decide something about these two images, which I added into this request. Taivo (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taivo, thanks for your message. I didn't see those nomination when I was doing this RfD. I deleted them now. Sincerely, JurgenNL (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Trollface barnstar.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Keφr (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trollface barnstar.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 16:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dera Admin JurgenNL,


Some bot uploaded a whole bunch of images onto picasa. I have marked about 35-45 of them. Please feel free to mark several if you have some time. The last few days I had to mark 100 images at panoramio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

nice. Time for no-life reviewing! Why don't we have a Picasa review bot? JurgenNL (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disturb you. I had to fail this image although the uploader says it is his/her own work. I trust you know what step to do next. I have no account on panoramio. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Davidmarin99

Hey JurgenNL, I noticed you tag a lot of the uploads by this user Davidmarin99 (talk · contribs) for deletion. Did you notice I changed some of the copyright information on them, or was it due to VisualFileChange? I'm thinking that some of the files like File:Natura España.png might qualify under the threshold of originality, but I'm not very sure because Commons doesn't seem to have much of a section for Spanish or Portuguese laws on the matter, and the Peruvian section is extremely short. I'm considering asking at the Village Pump for some advice on the copyright, and perhaps whether these logos are considered in scope for Commons at all. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 09:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TeleComNasSprVen, this was due to VFC. The images will be checked later today. JurgenNL (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mass rollback script

I noticed you had to deal with some more Wikinger edits earlier. Here's a script you might find helpful:

importScriptURI('//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/massRollback.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');

This script will give you a rollback all function in the drop-down box when looking at an editor's contribs. This way you don't have to do them one by one. INeverCry 21:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What an awesome tool! Thanks, I added it to my common.js JurgenNL (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have some other good ones at User:INeverCry/common.js. The 2 King of Hearts scripts give you an automated close option like DelReqHandler on undeletion requests and CFDs; the PleaseStanduserinfo script gives you a line at the top of any user/talk page showing the user's edit count, user groups, and when they last edited; the ru.wiki Mark blocked script crosses out the usernames of all blocked users. INeverCry 20:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, they make life so much easier! I added those scripts too, thanks! JurgenNL (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]