User talk:Trongphu

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trongphu!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

File:Xiangqi.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Trongphu!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

• Image:STA71104.JPG was uncategorized on 30 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:STA71149.JPG was uncategorized on 30 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Pencil1.JPG was uncategorized on 21 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:But.JPG was uncategorized on 21 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello !

Hi Trongphu !

I've reviewed your pictures as asked.

I think you are wrong in your choice of subjects.

Your camera is not able to take sophisticated pictures ("macro" inside, like your chess board, or strongly "photoshoped", like your "library" one).

In my opinion, maybe could you try to take at first very simple pictures, outside, with a good light, of the normal life, or of monuments or buildings in your country.

You know what ? I know Viet-Nam a little, I visited parts of your very nice country 15 years ago (Hanoï and the Halong bay). It was wonderful.

You have many things to take, looking maybe "normal" to you, but probably very interesting for the eyes of other members of the "Commons" community (I think you are alone as Vietnamese).

Please don't give up, try and try again.

And notice that my very first QI (and FP !) were taken with a very small camera !

Have a look to my galleries on my user page

You can do it !

Never forget to ask me (or others) if needed.

Cheers from Paris and good luck,--Jebulon (talk) 00:14, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Maybe you could download the software called GIMP. It is very helpful for improvements of pictures (colors, levels, correction of noise, of perspective etc...). At the very first time, it looks not very easy, but step after step, you may discover many interesting tools, and manage how to use them. Now I'm able to use retouching tools, and I can clone up or crop out disturbing elements in an image. And it is FREE ! Read first the WP related article, the don't hesitate to try it. Then you may correct perspective distortions, barrel distortions, and... mustache distortions too (yes, it exists !).--Jebulon (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xiangqi1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think there is a barrel distortion. Could you correct this? Send me a message if not.--Jebulon 23:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Even if corrected (by me), I'm afraid it is not good enough for QI... But I cannot vote now.--Jebulon 14:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)OK for me --Mbdortmund 18:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations for this very first QI !!!!!!!

Keep going !

And thank you for the barnstar--Jebulon (talk) 17:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates

Hello Trongphu, and thanks for participating at FPC. Please be aware that this is not a historical picture and revise your review accordingly. Note that many participants expressed dissatisfaction recently regarding "careless reviews" and lack of useful feedback, so I suggest you can take that as an encouragement to have a thorough critical look at each image and provide a more detailed feedback. Wish you happy editing. --ELEKHH^T 22:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Sach1.JPG

File:Sach1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Your valued image candidate

You carried out the nomination process correctly, but the valued image candidate page isn't displaying your image due to the large number of closed candidacies which need to be archived. They haven't been archived because the bot hasn't been operating properly for a few weeks. Hopefully it will be started back up again properly soon. Thanks. Claritas (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Trongphu,

Sorry to be so late in answering. I was wrong and Claritas is right. The VI system is completely blocked, you did not mistake. Let's wait, but I don't know who can or could do something.--Jebulon (talk) 09:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

• Hi Trongphu,

You four beauties are very nice and a very interesting topic. In the Valued Images Candidates page, you may nominate single pictures, or multiple picures in a set. If you take the time to read the complete guidelines, or the whole nomination page, you may learn what a set is. As you showed us four pictures, I think a set nomination should have been more appropriate. That's what I meant.--Jebulon (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Four Great Beauties.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good, but the scope must be reduced, I propose the "Four Great Beauties" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

• And what about a set ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:56, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
• ----

Scope changed from portrait to Four Great Beauties -- And I dk what is a set. You can choose whatever set you want.Trongphu (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support I changed the syntax of scope. Good scope now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Claritas (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
generations.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Interesting topic. A gallery would be welcome --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

VI : Egg illustrations

I suggest to change the scope "Egg illustrations" in "Egg illustrations nineteenth century." This premettrait, perhaps, to break the deadlock. Bonne Jounée.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Borboletas em Mini-Dálias.JPG

Chúc mừng Trongphu, tôi cảm ơn bạn rất nhiều bình luận của bạn trên bức ảnh của tôi. Đáng tiếc là tôi không phải là rất tốt tại các khái niệm của nhiếp ảnh, trên thực tế, chỉ muốn nắm bắt thời điểm này, khi bạn nhận thấy, vượt xa kỹ thuật và tinh tế. Tôi cũng muốn chúc mừng cho bạn vì những đóng góp ở đây trên Commons, làm phong phú thêm thế giới với những bức ảnh đẹp mà không cần hạn chế sử dụng, bởi vì chúng ta tìm thấy nhiều hình ảnh trực tuyến chuyên nghiệp, nhưng tiếc là các tác giả không phát hành bản quyền của họ. Một cái ôm Brazil! Conrado (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Shells

Hi, I started collecting shells about 35 years ago when I was studying biology. But it was always a hobby, never professional. More than 20 years ago I got another job (not as biologist), but the hobby remained. I collect(ed) shells during journeys, I exchanged with other collectors or I bought intersting shells. So I got and get my shells. Greetings --Llez (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bubblephotoshop.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bubblephotoshop.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bubblephotoshop.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your participating in voting

Dear Trongphu,

I can see that you participated in the featured picture voting on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinway & Sons concert grand piano, model D-274, manufactured at Steinway's factory in Hamburg, Germany.png. Fortunately, this beautiful picture became a featured picture because many persons participated in the voting period. The rules says that there has to be at least 7 supporting votes and a ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority).[1]

Therfore, I would kindly ask you if you would like to give your vote in this similar voting Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model K-132, manufactured at Steinway's factory in Hamburg, Germany.png before it ends on 9 May 2012 at 01:58:26 (UTC).

Thanks!

Yours sincerely, --Hereiamfriends (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC).

Picture of the Year/2011

Hi Trongphu. I'm not very familiar with the voting system, but as far as I can see you can vote for several pictures in thhe first round and only 1 vote in the final round. The price...? I don't know exactly, but I think... honour ;-) . Greetings --Llez (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hallo Trongphu. I never did it, so i am not famiiar with it. but on the upload page you find besides "It is entirely my own work" also the possibility "It is from another Wikimedia project (Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikinews, etc.)". Have you tried this tool? Perhaps you must download the picture on your computer and then upload again with this tool. --Llez (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Invitation - Featured picture voting

Dear Trongphu,

Thank you very much for your last participating in a featured picture voting about a musical instrument. I would kindly ask you if you would like to give your vote (and comments) in this featured picture voting about an upright piano of mahogany "Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model K-52 (mahogany finish), manufactured at Steinway's factory in New York City.jpg" before it ends on 23 Jun 2012 at 08:07:03 (UTC). The rules says that there has to be at least 7 supporting votes and a ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority).[2]

Thanks!

Yours sincerely, --Hereiamfriends (talk) 08:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:CrappyWikipedia1.JPG

And also:

• File:CrappyWikipedia.JPG
• File:Mystuff1.JPG
• File:Mypaper.JPG
• File:Mydata.JPG
• File:Text1.JPG

• Art-top (talk) 20:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:XaLuan.jpg

File:XaLuan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

(Perhaps this is usable under "Fair Use" criteria at the Vietnamese Wikipedia. If so, you can upload it there. Unfortunately, it does not belong here. Ubcule (talk) 19:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Coke2.JPG

File:Coke2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 22:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Caitivi.JPG

File:Caitivi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 11:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)