User talk:JuTa/Archive 53

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Photo Deletion

Hello, User talk:JuTa I hope this note finds you well! :) I was notified that the photo "File:Godfrey Thomson - 2014.jpg" was recently deleted by JuTa. The Reason for deletion: "No OTRS permission for 30 days" However on July 29th a permission email was sent by the photographer and copyright holder (Nicholas Karlin) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as instructed. It is my belief that everything was done correctly, if not, kindly advise me on what's needed to undelete said photo. Danke and have a great week! 2pennyworth (talk) 19:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, it was received end of July but nor confirmed by Commons:OTRS for more than a month later. By that reason I deleted it and of July. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard what might have been missing in this case. The Ticket number was 2020072910011008. --Ju Ta 20:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

I see, If Commons:OTRS takes a long time to confirm it perhaps they are back logged? I don't see how deleting it is the solution? 2pennyworth (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

the current backlog is 15 days - see Commons:OTRS/backlog. Deleting after a month sounds not too quick to me. --Ju Ta 07:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

It would stand to reason that if something was missing Commons would have notified me. I received no such notice and if I had I would have corrected it immediately. Is the "1 month" period your personal criteria or standard procedure? Again, it is not up to me how long Commons takes to clear photos. Everything was done 100% correct on my end so I do not understand the need now for all this extra work and waiting another 2 weeks for Commons to even read my request to undelete this photo.2pennyworth (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Lets ping User:Tulsi Bhagat, who was working on the ticket. He should know what was/is going on. --Ju Ta 14:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

PS: Are you Nicholas Karlin, the author of the image according the description page? If not he might received some questions and didnt answered. --Ju Ta 14:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. No I am not Nicholas Karlin. However I can email him and see if he got a notice regarding this photo.2pennyworth (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

File talk:Slaves Under punishment.jpg

File talk:Slaves Under punishment.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KNBDunlop (talk) 18:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Neutrik logo 2020.png

Hi JuTa,

can you please restore? There is now a valid permission.

Thanks, cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Mussklprozz: ich war so frei. JuTa kann übrigens ausgezeichnet deutsch ;-) Trägst Du die Freigabe ein? --Emha (talk) 08:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

... und schon wieder gelöscht von User:Taivo. --Ju Ta 09:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Verflixter Löscheifer. :-( @User:Taivo, @User:Ganímedes: Couldn’t you wait for a day? There is a valid permission, but even an OTRS agent has times when he must leave his computer for a few hours. Cheers, anyway. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Is wieder da. Ich hab' jetzt den {{Speedy}} vom July entfernt und den Pending tag erneuert. Gruß --Ju Ta 10:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Puh. ;-) Danke!, thank you!, ¡gracias! --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Media missing permission as of 17 August 2020 ff.

Hallo JuTa, ich vermisse Dich. Seit 16.8. fehlt mir Deine Mitarbeit. Was ist los? Adelfrank (talk) 11:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Ich mach das immer ab Sonntags. Diesmal bin ich etwas langsamer als sonst... --Ju Ta 11:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, Sonntag ist bald wieder! Ab 31.8.2020 sind die Äpfel schon alle reif und die Brötchen im Ofen verbrennen seit 11 Tagen: LG Adelfrank (talk) 07:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Wie gesagt: Einmal die Woche... --Ju Ta 10:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Fotos Heinrich Ehring

Guten Tag JuTa,

Als Administrator haben Sie die fogenden Fotos wegen ungeklärtem Copyright gelöscht:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Heinrich_Ehring_Undine.jpg

Die Inhaberin der Urheberrechte hatte aber folgende Nachricht am 02.08.2020 an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org gesendet:

I hereby affirm that I, Prof. Barbara Ehring, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the following media:

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Prof. Barbara Ehring 2020-08-02

Von Wikipedia kam darauf hin folgende Antwort:

Dear Barbara Ehring,

Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2020080210005279].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team

Ich weiß nicht, was wir sonst tun können, um die Fotos zu verwenden.

Viele Grüße, SHORT CUTS, Berlin

Hallo, da auch nach über einem Monat keine Bestätigung auf der Bildbeschreibung vorlag, wurden die Bilder gelöscht. Bitte frag auf Commons:OTRS noticeboard nach, ob und was evtl. noch fehlte. Danke und Gruß --Ju Ta 21:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, das werde ich versuchen

File:Das ist ein Bild von Jens Jäger (2019).jpg

Moin JuTa,

wieder so ein gelöschtes Bild, für das jetzt eine Freigabe beim OTRS vorliegt. Könntest Du bitte wiederherstellen? Ich komme allerdings vielleicht erst am Sonntagmorgen dazu, die Lizenz einzutragen. Kann verhindert werden, dass es uns nicht gleich wieder unter dem Hintern weggelöscht wird, sobald Du es wiederhergestellt hast?

Grüß aus dem Neckarland, schönes Wochenende, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, ist wieder da und "renewed". Gruß --Ju Ta 21:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Besten Dank! Hab die Freigabe eingetragen. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Please undelete Category:Cessnock Hotel

Could you please undelete Category:Cessnock Hotel? I have a photographs to add to it (will need to locate on what HDD I've put them on). Bidgee (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Done. Please repopulate it the next days. --Ju Ta 10:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, will do (hopefully tomorrow or Monday at the latest). Bidgee (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Deleted files

Hi there JuTa. I saw that you deleted files regarding Leslie Goonewardene as there had been no OTRS Permission for 30 days. It would be great if you could undo this – each of these photos was explicitely taken by the author, who had been in contact with an OTRS Representative, but the OTRS rep stopped contacting them about 2 weeks ago. He has since sent 3 emails to no avail. Each of these images was correctly licences, but struggles in getting OTRS to respond have led to deletion – surely a backlog on the part of OTRS shouldn't lead to a photo otherwise not nominated for deletion to be deleted? Many thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, the current OTRS backlog is 9 days. Please as on Commons:OTRS noticeboard about this case, might be it was just forgotten, might be there is still something missing. regards --Ju Ta 12:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

File:20091227165412!AllySloper.jpg

Hello, I was reported this file is mission essential source information. I've update its source information. Can you please review? Rsakib188 (talk) 03:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Ju Ta 09:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Tk50o5r2k3.jpg

Hello , I've updated its copyright information and description. Please consider reviewing. Rsakib188 (talk) 04:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi {{Currency}} is no license template. You now left behind the files without a license. I fear that Bangldesh Bank notes are copyrighted - see Commons:Currency where this country is missing. --Ju Ta 09:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Commons:Currency/Asia this page says wiki currently doesn't have any information on currency copyright rules of Bangladesh. What is the appropriate thing to do in such case? - Rsakib188 (talk) 13:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Dont upload such images per COM:PRP. --Ju Ta 13:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've been looking through copyright acts of government of Bangladesh. Bangladesh have copyright law for 15 subjects.(link:http://www.clcbd.org/document/577.html) Currency is not one of them. So no copyright is applicable with photos of currency. What license tag should I use for such case? -Rsakib188 (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Then likely

Copyright in a Government work, where the Government is the first owner of the copyright, subsists until 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work is published.[28/2000 Section 29]

Applies. And the notes are copyrighted. But you may ask on Commons:Village pump/Copyright for further opinions. --Ju Ta 23:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Re: Copyright status: File:Rimski cestovni sustav srednje Dalmacije.jpg

Hi, thanks for your comment. If that source is not sufficient here is another one, hopefully this one is ok.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323993452_Hodoloska_istrazivanja_Petrovo_polje

Thanks in advance MasterAltair1 (talk) 09:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

No, the image is copyrighted by its author. You have no right to publish it here. --Ju Ta 09:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Well okay then I guess that is it then. Thanks for reply. MasterAltair1 (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Kartenlöschung

Hallo, für das Löschen dieser Karte gab es soweit ich sehe (im Internet sind noch Reste der Karte über Suchdienste sichtbar) keinen sinnvollen Grund. Wie hier erkennbar beruhte die Wikipediakarte auf öffentlichen Daten der mex. Zensusbehörden. Da ist nichts geschützt und jeder kann sich so eine Karte basteln und sie bei Wikipedia einstellen. Wenn das auf der Dateiseite falsch oder gar nicht ausgewiesen ist und die Datenquelle nicht ordentlich benannt wird, kann man das in solchen Fällen lieber selbst recherchieren und dann eben ergänzen als einfach ohne genaueres Nachfragen die ganze Datei zu löschen. Sollte wiederhergestellt werden, danke.--Jordi (talk) 07:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Die angegebene Quelle war: Suárez, Jorge A. (1993). Mesoamerican indian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. xiv-xv. D.h. wir bräuchten eine COM:OTRS-Freigabe von Hrn. Suárez. Gruß --Ju Ta 07:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Nein, die Daten, die Suárez benutzt, sind ja frei zugänglich und die Karte ist kein schutzfähiges Werk. Auch die Zeichnung stammte offensichtlich nicht aus dem Buch (war also keine eingescannte Fotokopie oder sowas), sondern, sw. ich das Aussehen der Datei anhand der übriggebliebenen Thumbs beurteilen kann, vom Hochlader oder sonst jmd. selbsterstellt.--Jordi (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Die Originalveröffentlichung kannst du dir hier bei GoogleBooks anschauen. Diese Karte aus dem Buch einfach zu kopieren, wäre (womöglich, wenn man der Zeichnung Schutzhöhe zumisst) eine URV, das bloße Abzeichnen ist aber kein Problem, da die Daten nicht geschützt sind.--Jordi (talk) 08:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Nchtr.: Zudem gibt es auch inhaltliche Abweichungen, denn Suárez' Originalkarte differenziert in der Kartendarstellung nicht nach Sprecherzahl, während die gelöschte Datei nur die Sprachen mit mehr als 100.000 Sprechern abbildete. Ist also eine rein ableitende Bearbeitung auf der Grundlage der Fachliteratur, keine URV erkennbar.--Jordi (talk) 08:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Nchtr. 2: Hier findest du noch eine ähnliche Datei, auch hier eine regierungsamtliche Quelle. Was man der gelöschten Datei evtl. vorwerfen könnte, wären inhaltliche Fehler, weil ich anhand der Vergleichskarten nicht nachvollziehen kann, woher die Sprecherzahlen stammen und warum die uto-aztekischen Sprachen ganz fehlen, aber das ist hier nicht die Frage.--Jordi (talk) 08:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Über die Kategorie "Linguistic maps of Mexico" finden sich weitere Dateien identischer Machart mit der gleichen Quellenangabe, die unangefochten weiterbestehen.

[:File:Map of the indigenous languages of Mexico with fewer than 20,000 speakers.png]
[:File:Map of the languages of Mexico with 20,000 to 100,000 speakers.png]
[:File:Map of the languages of Mexico.png]
[:File:Mapa de lenguas de México + 100 000 ru.png]
[:File:Mapa de lenguas de México + 100 000fr.png]
[:File:Mapa de lenguas de México - 20 000.png]

Bei allen diesen Dateien ist die Angabe von Suárez' Buch offenkundig keine Urheberangabe, sondern eine bloße Quellenangabe ohne Bedeutung für den Urheberstatus. Es fehlt bei den Dateien tw. eine ordentliche Beschreibung und die Urheberangabe, das ist aber kein Löschgrund. Als Urheber wird in einigen Fällen der Hochlader Benutzer @Yavidaxiu präsumiert, was wohl auch korrekt ist. Es handelt sich stets um selbsterstellte Karten auf der Datenbasis von Suárez (unter Hinzunahme weiterer Daten wie der Sprecherzahl). Alle Daten sind frei zugänglich. Würde dich daher bitten, deine wohl irrtümliche Löschung der dt. Version der Datei wieder rückgängig zu machen und die Angaben stattdessen sachgemäß zu berichtigen/ergänzen, danke dir.--Jordi (talk) 09:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, ich hab' die Dateien nun wieder hergestellt und in einen regülären Löschantrag umgewndelt. Kannst ja dort Deine Argumente nochmal vorbringen. Siehe Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mapa de lenguas de México + 100 000.png und Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mapa de lenguas de México 20.000-100.000.png. Gruß --Ju Ta 10:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Super, danke.--Jordi (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Your deletion request about my uploads

Hi, Most uploads are from https://luxemburgensia.bnl.lu/. Please read what's written on the webpage. Sauf mention contraire, et à l'exception de la collection des cartes postales, le contenu de cette page est sous contrat Creative Commons. IMHO, the files are all Creative Commons, and thus should not be deleted. Cheers, AiPee213-100 (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Thats linked to CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 FR https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/fr/deed.fr. But images on commons must be reuseable even commercialy. NC-Licenses are not accepted on commons. --Ju Ta 20:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Saxen Weimar Eisenbach (surname)

N'Abend JuTa. 1 Heißt es nicht Saxen, weil wir nicht niederländisch schreiben, 2. heißt es nicht Eisenbach, sondern Eisenach und 3. ist Deine Erstellung Nonsens, es gibt auch keinem Familiennamen Bayern, Preußen oder Russland u. dergleichen, oder irre ich mich? Wenn Du schon einen Namen brauchst, versuche es mal mit Wettin. Adelfrank (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Ihr Lemma ist aber nicht Wettin. --Ju Ta 06:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

file: Wikimedia Projects in Blackening Wikipedia template.jpg and File:Noircir Wikipédia cabezal fb.jpg

Hi@JuTa: , the author of these two images has finally sent the OTRS ticket to permissions-commons. The ticket number is Ticket#: 2020091610004831. Can you please revert the removal of the two files? Warmest regards, Galahmm (talk) 08:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Please talk to the OTRS stuff at Commons:OTRS noticeboard. There are admins as well who can check the (new) Ticket AND restore the images. --Ju Ta 09:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Patronyms are not given names

I strongly disagree with the names of the categories you created. Patronyms are not given names, you cannot just go and call your child “Alekseevich Jones”. I think a new category for patronyms is required, but all of these categories should be renamed in all cases. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

I have to agree here. Patronmys like ~vich, ~son/~dottir and the like are not given names. Instead they are on the same level as family names. Confer also Spanish names like "Pedro Alvarez Gonzalez" which are composed of the family names of both parents. In the latter case, Alvarez is not a given name either. De728631 (talk) 20:17, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Hmm, thats years ago, but what about to categorize patronyms as Category:Patronyms? --Ju Ta 21:57, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but with a separation between male and female ones. That in my eyes is not a big problem, it can be easily re-cat-a-lot'ed; the problem are the names of the categories, in all of which “(given name)” should be changed to “(patronym)”. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello again, with help of a simple query and Quickcategories I was able to get the patronymics I was talking about (the Slavic ones) to Category:Patronymics reasonably fast. There is still the problem with the category names, and Perhelion's massrename only works for files, so a bot is probably needed. Infovarius moved Category:Pavlovna (patronym) to the current name, but it seems "patronymic" is actually the prevalent term for this name in English (as opposed to "synonym" etc.), so we should probably use that. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Please dont mass rename those cats, they or their child-cats are partly filled up automatcly via {{Wikidata Infobox}}. That needs to be fixed first within the template and/or on wikidata. Feel free to open a request on Template talk:Wikidata Infobox. Thx. --Ju Ta 13:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Could you please show me just one case where this is done through Wikidata, so that I understand what you mean. For example, Vladimir Putin (Q7747), which is connected to Category:Vladimir Putin, does have patronym or matronym for this person (P5056) filled, but the category isn't contained in Category:Vladimirovich (given name)‎ in any way. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

One example is Category:Sergey Aleksandrovich Alimov. --Ju Ta 15:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

I don't see where the infobox adds any patronymic categories. It adds a category for a combination of given name and patronymic, but those are outside of the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Any comments? I have no problem with having given name–patronymic pair categories named like given name categories, but your argument against the immediate renaming of patronymic categories does not seem to be founded by any examples yet. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot. It looks like you are correct. If you like, go ahead... --Ju Ta 04:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Oops, I forgot about this. As I said, massrename is only for files, and AWB only allows admins to move pages. I will try to do it with PAWS now, let's see. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Done. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Please restore the photo

Hi, Please restore the photo you deleted. All data regarding this file has been entered. I will be grateful if you can restore the photo. Thank you in advance. TIA722 (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, if you talk about File:Адвокат.jpeg: Its hard to believe that this is your own work, which means you shot the original photo. Sorry, I will not restore this image.--Ju Ta 18:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I didn't quite understand what you mean. I wrote an article about my grandfather. I added a photo that belongs to me. This photo was taken from the family album. I have included all the necessary information. I ask you very much to restore the photo or tell me what other information you need to add. Thank you in advance. TIA722 (talk) 05:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Well, the google translate of the original description you gave is: The photo was taken by a journalist during another interview.. So the author and copyright owner is that journalist, not you. I'm sorry, but you have no right to publish this photo under a free license. regards --Ju Ta 07:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

- - OK, now I understood you, but just want to let you know that this photo was taken by a journalist and given to us. This was done for us, that is, for his family. The original film, copyright and licensing was transferred to us. This journalist is not even alive. If am not mistake it was 1983. This photo is kept in our family album and the original film is also. If necessary I can change the text and rename the name and write that "The photo belongs to me." Please reconsider the possible options, it may still be possible to publish the photo. Best wishes. 188.253.239.143 13:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, if you have a written contract or similar of the copyright to you, then please confirm this by sending an email to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. Otherwise you would need to ask the heirs of the photographer to do this. regards --Ju Ta 14:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for info, It will be possible to clarify how this should be done. Upload the photo again and send an email to the commons support, or will you restore the photo and I will edit the details of the photo?

Regards, 188.253.239.143 20:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

OTRS people will restore or request restoration after the pemission has been confirmed. --Ju Ta 03:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you and have a good day TIA722 (talk) 09:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cemal Tural

Hi there. Can you revive Category:Cemal Tural bitte? Danke. --E4024 (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Ju Ta 02:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

About "File:Stacey Long by Raymond Lo2.jpg"

Raymond Lo has already sent email through OTRS. The case ticket:2020091910004639 is processing. Joe FSF (talk) 03:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Correct. Sorry I missed that. The file is back. But be aware: the permission is not confirmed yet. --Ju Ta 07:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

File:20101031 SemanticMediaWiki Logo.png

File:20101031 SemanticMediaWiki Logo.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: unnecessary redirect. --[[User:Kghbln [[kgh]]]])

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Kghbln.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Behavioural_signposts_to_workplace_bullying.pdf

Hi there, this pdf was created by me for my assignment page. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2020/Workplace_mental_health

I am not sure why it was deleted? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GwenFord (talk • contribs) 2020-09-24T01:28:50‎ (UTC)

Excactly this fact has been doubted. But I think you are correct. The file is back. --Ju Ta 03:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

File:VivaXElRock19-19 (50082136518).jpg ‎and File:VivaXElRock19-19.jpg

How is it possible that File:VivaXElRock19-19 (50082136518).jpg uploaded in Dezember 2019 is an "exact or scaled-down duplicate" of File:VivaXElRock19-19.jpg uploaded on July 22 2020? Please delete the correct duplicate and undelete the original upload. Tm (talk) 04:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The first one was uploaded just a few days ago, see here. regards --Ju Ta 04:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

My apologizes, first for my mistake and the that there must be something wrong with this situation. Please, let me explain why i did opened this query: I uploaded several (all?) images of this concert in Dezember 24, as you can see in the category of this files and had File:VivaXElRock19-19 (50082136518).jpg on my watch list. What i dont understand as, if this file was uploaded in September, how did i had this filename in my watchlist, as you deleted several others images of this concert and those do not appear in my watchlist? Is it possible that i uploaded in Dezember 24 2019 and was deleted as a duplicate of VivaXElRock19-19.jpg, between July and September 2020? As this is the only explanation as to why was File:VivaXElRock19-19 (50082136518).jpg in my watchlist. Is it possible to check that info to see if my hipothesis is correct? Thanks and sorry for this confusion. Tm (talk) 04:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

No, there are no other (deleted) versions of that file. That would be visible in the linked log either. Maybe your flickr transfer for this file failed anyhow but it added it to your watchlist. I dont know how flickr2commons works in detail... --Ju Ta 05:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Baustein für Bilder mit fehlenden Informationen zum Lizenzbaustein

Hallo JuTa; Du hast bei einigen von mir markierten Bildern das Template:No license since mit der Begründung "This file has a license" entfernt. Diese Bilder haben tatsächlich einen Lizenzbaustein, allerdings halte ich diesen für äusserst zweifelhaft und zur Verifikation der Lizenz nötige Information fehlt. Beim File:Jaroslav Stockar (1890-1977).jpg wird zum Beispiel die Lizenz Template:PD-Czechoslovakia-anon verwendet, für welche das Bild vor 1949 erstveröffentlicht worden sein muss, dies in der Tschechoslowakei und ohne Nennung des Autors. Zu keiner dieser 3 Bedingungen gibt der Uploader oder die verlinkte Quelle eine Angabe, ich halten den Lizenzbaustein daher für aus der Luft gegriffen. Das Template:No license since habe ich gewählt, weil es ja nicht per se sagt, dass kein Lizenzbaustein gesetzt wurde, sondern wegen der Aussage: "This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status." Ist dieser für diese Anwendung nicht vorgesehen? Wie würdest Du in einem solchen Fall vorgehen? Danke und Gruss, Andel (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Bitte öffne reguläre Löschanträge für diese Bilder, danke. --Ju Ta 19:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Retour du supermarché.jpg

Hi, I agree that this should not be renamed. I cannot change it, because I have no moderator rights. So I don't put 'duplicate' on the file with the french name. I hope you agree, maybe ask a moderator? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Thx, I plan to wait a month before I decline the rename request myself. Or another admin will decide quicker. --Ju Ta 13:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting all my Irish map files without informing me, and ignoring my explanation as to why they are not in copyright. Really great to know my attempts to add useful info/pics to Wikipedia are appreciated. WisDom-UK — Preceding unsigned comment added by WisDom-UK (talk • contribs) 2020-09-28T19:30:30‎ (UTC)

Hi, you are wellcome. Every image on Commons needs a valid license template transcluded on its description page. This was missing here, and you has been notified about that onn 18.9. After a week without fixing such images are up to speedy deletions. Its normaly the duty of the uploader to do this, but I now searched for a valid license temaplete, which is {{PD-UKGov}} accourding Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom and undeleted the files. Next time please ztry to do that yourself. regards --Ju Ta 00:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

PS: If you need help, you may ask for it on i.e. Commons:Help desk. --Ju Ta 00:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Gelöschte Inhalte St.Konrad Ge. Marienfenster

Hallo. Eingegangen schon, aber seit über einem Monat nicht von einem OTRS-Mitarbeiter bestätigt. Bitte frag auf Commons:OTRS noticeboard nach, ob und was denn fehlte. Die Ticketnummer war 2020081910003721. Die anderen Bilder hatte übrigfens User:Mussklprozz bestätigt. Gruß --Ju Ta 00:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Moin beiderseits. Bei OTRS sind zwei Freigabetickets eingegangen, die ich bearbeitet habe: Die erwähnte #2020081910003721 sowie #2020090810002536. Die oben genannten Dateien kommen in beiden nicht vor. @J.hagelüken, weißt Du eine weitere Ticketnummer, oder die Absenderadresse, von der die Freigabe für die hier genannten Bilder kam? Gerne auch vertraulich per Wikimail. – Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Station Berri-UQAM, 23 mars 2020.jpg

Hi,

Regarding the deletion of the File:Station Berri-UQAM, 23 mars 2020.jpg. I did submit the image through {{OTRS}}, the email was received (and properly filled for what I can say) and a ticket open (id=2020091910006388). I even asked user Kvardek about the banner, if something was done about this. His answer: the ticket was not processed at this point.

8 days later (8 days!), the file is simply erased. Could you, or anyone, confirm that someone went through the OTRS ticket before deleting the file? Is this OTRS system working at all? If so, what else should have been done for the file to be release under the right licence? I am clueless.

Thanks, Dirac (talk) 01:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but there was missing a license template transcluded on the description page. Such images get up to speedy deletion after one week. OTRS stuff will arrange the undeletion if the release turned out valid. --Ju Ta 01:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

How can I avoid this in the future? Do you have an example where the licence template is correctly included in the description page? Thanks, Dirac (talk) 13:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Ask the copyright holder under which excact license he likes to publish the image(s) - i.e. {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} - ans add the correspondig template to the file description page - see also Commons:Copyright tags. In the subcats of Category:OTRS pending you find a lozt of examples with applied license templates. --Ju Ta 14:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Here's part of the content of the email that was sent to the OTRS-fr team, using the template available on Commons:Messages type:

permissions-fr@wikimedia.org

Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de l'œuvre https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Station_Berri-UQAM,_23_mars_2020.jpg

Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence: : CC BY 4.0.

[...]

The license was clearly indicated. Was it simply because that tag was missing from the file description? Dirac (talk) 19:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but as we now know which license, I restored it and fixed the description page - see here. --Ju Ta 20:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Noted. Thanks, Dirac (talk) 23:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

COM:RFR

Hi JuTa, there is the backlog of user rights requests, Several days ago, I drop a request for Upload Wizard campaign editors rights over at COM:RFR#Upload Wizard campaign editors, and many others request has remained unanswered for several days. I've knocked you as if the request has remained unanswered for several days, should consider asking an administrator to respond. Thanks for your valuable time. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 10:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not very experienced with that type of right. Can you ask another admin? --Ju Ta 10:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick response. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 10:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Bilder von Willi Dirx

Moin JuTa,..

es geht um

Hierzu liegt seit dem 29. August eine Freigabe der Rechteinhaberin bei OTRS vor, die ich bestätigt habe. Vermutlich habe ich es dann versäumt, die Freigabevermerke in die Dateien einzutragen. Kannst Du bitte die Dateien wiederherstellen?

Vielen Dank dafür, Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Done. Bitte jetzt deinen OTRS task komplettieren. Die ersten 5 waren überigens noch da und OK. --Ju Ta 09:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Done. Danke. Vermutlich ist bei der Sammelfreigabe beim ersten Mal etwas schief gegangen, so dass ich nur die ersten fünf erwischt hatte. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Image restored ?

Since we are at it, would it be possible to restore those two images as well?

Here's the email originaly sent on the 2020-06-23:

permissions-fr@wikimedia.org

Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de l'œuvre

Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence: : CC BY 4.0.

[...] Rebeccy D.

Would it be possible to restore them and apply the correct license template in the information tab?

Thanks, Dirac (talk) 13:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, this time the license template was there, but the release wasnt confirmed by OTRS-stuff. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard what was missing or went wrong. PS: The tikcte numnber was 2020062310008552. PPS: This is still the case with the other file. My restore wanst a final decistion. If the relase will not confirmed for more than a month, this file will get deleted again. regards. --Ju Ta 21:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Yuti No8.pdf bitte wiederherstellen

Hallo JuTa,

kannst Du bitte diese Datei wiederherstellen? Es liegt eine Freigabe bei OTRS vor.

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:37, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

{done}}. --Ju Ta 15:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, guten Wochenbeginn! --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Le gardien de Harold Pinter.jpg

Good evening JuTa,

The file you flagged for deletion was added by Charles Torjdman himself, the actor depicted on those pics (which are his own), he his behind the username User:Humblement (see my talk page on the french wiki)

Let me know if that is not enough to remove the deletion flag, I'll try to explain to him what needs to be done (the guy struggles a lot to understand how WP and COM work)

Best, --ManuRoquette (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

EDITː Same for File:Le Nain Lumineux.jpg, File:Paradis pour une syncope.jpg & File:Procès à jésus diégo fabbri.jpg.

Bonsoir @ManuRoquette, actuellement je suis ici pour une autre raison et je suis tombé sur ta question. C'est toujours le photographe qui détient le droit d'auteur sur une photo, et non la personne représentée sur la photo. Il faut donc que @Humblement envoie une déclaration à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org sur quelle manière il a obtenu les pleins droits d'utilisation du photographe. Ou mieux encore, que le photographe lui-même donne une autorisation sous licence libre à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Tu trouveras les détails ici. – Cordialement, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Undeletation question about File:DaveLeducTunTunMin.jpg

Hi, this is about the OTRS permissions on File:DaveLeducTunTunMin.jpg.

Prior to deletion, all the authors of the pictures on the file had sent their OTRS permissions for the pictures and graphic designs.

Ticket:2020042510002398
Ticket:2020042510002398

WikiCommons admins were only waiting on one last explanation for the Pagoda picture used at the background top of the poster, but it ultimately took too long and the file was deleted., but I believe the file is good to go.

I was told that ONE8IGHT, the creator of the file, sent the explanation/permission for the pagoda via email. Therefore, all the pictures have now been addressed.

Since you were the one to close the discussion/delete, can you please take look for the email from andreas.hesselback@gmail.com explaining showing permission for the Pagoda in the background. And if you can help me in the process of undelatation.

(Once the file is restored, I am planning to reduce the size of the image.)

Thank you for your precious help,

Best regards, Lethweimaster (talk)

Hi, please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case. --Ju Ta 23:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Peter Sprague (w-twin-neck, by Rick Sokol).jpg

Moin JuTa,

wie gehabt: auch hierfür liegt inzwischen eine Freigabe bei OTRS vor. Kannst Du bitte wiederherstellen?

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Ju Ta 07:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Done Danke, Permission eingetragen. --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Gebrüder Metz

Hallo, die Vorlage wurde inzwischen bestätigt und wird von vielen Dateien benutzt.
Gruß --Mewa767 (talk) 07:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Ist es bereits. Gruß --Ju Ta 07:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Selfportrait Yael Margelisch.jpg

Moin JuTa,

auch hierfür ist heute eine Freigabe bei OTRS eingetrudelt. Kannst Du bitte wiederherstellen?

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Done --Ju Ta 07:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Done danke, Permission eingetragen. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. Can you please revive Category:Bloggers from Azerbaijan? (The deleting admin has a "busy" note on their page.) Danke. --E4024 (talk) 01:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Ju Ta 09:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Deleting of scans-images and the descriptions used in articles

I am opposed to deleting images with licence "permission={{PD-Art-100}}", scanned by me: 1) Dopisnice_Silou_lví._III._zemský_slet_Orla_v_Kroměříži_1912.jpg - I own a scanned postcard, 2) Pavel_Stránský_ze_Záp,_Respublica_Bojema,_1634,_De_situ_qualitatibusque_Bojemiae,_s._1.jpg - scanned from book hundreds of years old (see 1634 in filename), and 3) Pozdrav_z_Dědic_u_Vyškova,_pohlednice_prošlá_poštou_1899.jpg - I own a scanned postcard passed by post 1899--Pavel Fric (talk) 06:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

The problem was, they are not your own work and they are not created in 2020 as claimed by you, that doesnt fit to {{PD-old-100}}. --Ju Ta 07:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

PS:The author of a 1899 work can easily be lived past 1919, which would make the PD-old-100 license invalid. --Ju Ta 07:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Prove this statement or better: suggest another license to embed in the source code of the page with the uploaded file(s). For example, I paid CZK 500 at auction for the Dědice postcard. Also, you are forgetting to mention a deletion od the scan of page from a book more than 350 years old too. I don't suppose you would use the same argument about human lifes length expectancy in this case, or what did you mean with it?--Pavel Fric (talk) 18:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

What??? --Ju Ta 22:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

1) The file Pavel_Stránský_ze_Záp,_Respublica_Bojema,_1634,_De_situ_qualitatibusque_Bojemiae,_s._1.jpg - The work of Pavel Stránský ze Záp, Respublica Bojema, was published in 1634. 2) I am the current owner of the specimen and author of the scan of the postcard used as template for the file: Pozdrav z Dědic u Vyškova, pohlednice prošlá poštou 1899.jpg, which was used here in article and now is missing: Dědice (Vyškov) with my description in label: "Náměstí v Dědicích na konci 19. století. Pozdrav z Dědic u Vyškova poslaný poštou v roce 1899" (and additional information used on the Wikimedia page with the file concerning some aspects of the additional text on postcard etc.).--Pavel Fric (talk) 19:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

OK the 2 files are back. I've coorected the description pages - see here and here. Next tome please try to do that yourself. regards. --Ju Ta 21:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. It is inspiration for me, what to change after the posiible future upload of digital copies of such interesting documents. But, I would point at "Dopisnice_Silou_lví._III._zemský_slet_Orla_v_Kroměříži_1912.jpg". A syou can see, there is moravian eagle as emblem used as one of symbolic/emblematic motives for this postcard. The coat of arms of Moravia was (and is) the part of state symbols: Habsburg monarchy (to 1918), and after Czechoslovak Republic etc. and now Czech Republic. Besides the age of the document, I would think that there is a regulation on state symbols that allows them to be distributed in this way without restriction (copying rights) to which other documents are subject.--Pavel Fric (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

We doidnt talked about that one yet. But its clearly a copyrightable art of work not created by you as claimed. Where you got the image from? Who is the artist and when did he die? --Ju Ta 17:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Postcard bought at auction, the year of the event: 1912, image comes from my scanner, also: source=Self-scanned, author=Unknown author (if is not marked as the part of the postcard).--Pavel Fric (talk) 17:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

OK, its back and fixed - see here. Again: next time please do this yourself preventing trouble for all sites. Thx. --Ju Ta 17:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Removal of collage photos

Hello

I am writing to ask why you deleted all of the collage photos I added yet they were within the copyright ©️ free category of being reused.? It seems random to me why you deleted them but not any other collage photos I've seen like on Nottingham and Derby for example.

It feels like you targeted me for no reason with removal. They were formative but then removed but Nottingham or Leicester. Do you mind explaining why you removed them.

Thank you RailwayJG (talk) 06:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

I deleted those which was marked with {{Dw no source since}} more than a week ago. Yours were marked by User:Smooth O on 25.9. but without notifiying you, whoich he should done. As background: For thors collages, we need a valid source for every single used image within the file description pages, which was missing here. --Ju Ta 06:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello thank you. Can you elaborate a little on the valid source you mentioned please? You mean a link to site in the description or a mention of photographer. Thank you RailwayJG (talk) 07:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

I mean a link to the site where you got these images from. They must state clearly a free license, otherwise its a copyright violation. And depending of the license(s) given the author(s) need to be named n description page as well. --Ju Ta 09:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

That's a bit of a stretch as I think to mention all that would make it very impractical. Maybe a link would work RailwayJG (talk) 14:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Interesting attribution

Hi JuTa, I wonder why you added this. The image is obviously by user:ComputerHotline, but you just added some other user? Multichill (talk) 16:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

That was a mistake. I worked on duplicate files, saw a missing {{Information}} on this one and just copied it over from Special:Undelete/File:Canard_.jpg. Thx for fixing it. --Ju Ta 19:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of photograph of Nicholas McGaughey

I have an email from Nick's agent authorising the use of this photograph which I am happy to forward to you, as well as a follow-up to my request that Nick explicitly extend his permission explaining that he is not available to do so at this time. Linguoboy (talk) 04:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The COM:OTRS release was not confirmed for more than a month. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard what was wron or missing. Thx. --Ju Ta 07:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Isn't there a way to request an extension? We have explicit permission to use the photograph, just not an email from McGaughey himself. Linguoboy (talk) 14:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Again: Ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for it. I cannot see the tickets or mails as I am no OTRS-member. --Ju Ta 15:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Bilder von Maria Bettina Cogliatti

Moin JuTa,

kannst Du bitte wiederherstellen:

Beim OTRS liegt eine Freigabe der Künstlerin vor.

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Ju Ta 22:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Danke :-) --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Peter Hansen

Buenas, por qué borraste la imagen? Saludos. --Col. Hessler (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Because its not your own work as claimed. --Ju Ta 22:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Yo no subí la imagen. --Col. Hessler (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedian in residence - Wikimedia Serbia

Hello JuTa,

I am Gorana Gomirac, GLAM manager at Wikimedia Serbia. I wanted to ask you if it is possible to restore deleted files from category:Wikipedian in residence - The Association of Fine Artists of Serbia ? We provided CC permission on which the deleted files were linked (permission arrived from the institution before deletion, but we did not manage to note it). Thanks in advance for the help and if I can help in any way, please contact me at gorana.gomirac@vikimedija.org.

Kind regards!

Hi, Which files exactly your are talking about? But if it is a case of COM:OTRS, please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for it. --Ju Ta 10:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

@JuTa:

Hello JuTa, these are the files that have been removed by you. OTRS ticket number is #2020100910009543.

Thank you in advance and sorry for the late arrival of the Permission.

These images had an uncofirmed {{OTRS pending}} since beginning of September. After a month such images are up to speedy deletion. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for these cases including the ticket number(s). They can have a look if and what was missing. regards PS: Please sign you post on talk tages. --Ju Ta 12:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

User talk:JuTa/Archive 53

Photo Deletion

Category:Media missing permission as of 17 August 2020 ff.

Fotos Heinrich Ehring

Please undelete Category:Cessnock Hotel

Deleted files

Re: Copyright status: File:Rimski cestovni sustav srednje Dalmacije.jpg

Kartenlöschung

Your deletion request about my uploads

file: Wikimedia Projects in Blackening Wikipedia template.jpg and File:Noircir Wikipédia cabezal fb.jpg

Patronyms are not given names

Please restore the photo

Category:Cemal Tural

About "File:Stacey Long by Raymond Lo2.jpg"

File:VivaXElRock19-19 (50082136518).jpg ‎and File:VivaXElRock19-19.jpg

Baustein für Bilder mit fehlenden Informationen zum Lizenzbaustein

Thanks

Gelöschte Inhalte St.Konrad Ge. Marienfenster

File:Station Berri-UQAM, 23 mars 2020.jpg

COM:RFR

Bilder von Willi Dirx

Image restored ?

File:Yuti No8.pdf bitte wiederherstellen

Undeletation question about File:DaveLeducTunTunMin.jpg

Hi

Deleting of scans-images and the descriptions used in articles

Removal of collage photos

Interesting attribution

Deletion of photograph of Nicholas McGaughey

Bilder von Maria Bettina Cogliatti

Peter Hansen

Wikipedian in residence - Wikimedia Serbia

Navigation menu

Search