User talk:J.hagelüken

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, J.hagelüken!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, weißt du, auf dem Gebiet welcher Stadt dieser schöne Baum steht? Oder kannst du beschreiben, wo ungefähr im Felderbachtal das ist (nächste Straße? Hof in der Nähe)? Dann könnte das Bild nämlich noch in die passende Städtekategorie. Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Holger1959, der Baum steht auf dem Grenzgebiet zwischen Hattingen und Velbert. Ich habe leider keine Flurkarte, du findest den Baum bei den Koordinaten 51°22'2.33"N 7° 8'31.16"E

LG --J.hagelüken (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

danke! habs einsortiert. Holger1959 (talk) 07:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Figurenrelief, Menschen in der Stadt[edit]

Hallo J.hagelüken,

Das Bild zeigt keinen Bildhauer (Sculptors from Germany) im Portait aus Deutschland. Das Objekt selber, das Relief ist unter Category:Menschen in der Stadt (Willi Dirx) zusammengefasst. --Atamari (talk) 10:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Atamari, die Zuordnung des Bildes Willi Dirx Figurenrelief in Kategorien ist dann im Sinne der Enzyklopädie, wenn die Kategorien zu einem Veständnis des Bildes beitragen. In diesem Sinne halte ich es für angmessen, die Kategorien in der von mir vorgenommenen Reihenfolge einzusetzen.Natürlich kannst du dahinter auch noch die Kategorie 2016 photographs of Wuppertal hinzufügen. Wäre nett von dir zu hören. Freundliche Grüße --J.hagelüken (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Das Kategoriesystem ist ein hierarchies System, das heißt nach unten hin sich die Eigenschaften vererben. Es ist kein Tag-System wie bei anderen Foto-Communities.

Ach ja Wikipedia:Commons ist "keine" Enzyklopädie, sondern ein Bilderpool, der unter anderen den anderen Wikipedia-Projekten zur Verfügung steht und auch allen anderen Nachnutzern. Die Kategorien dienen der Verwaltung und Auffindbarkeit des Bildes nicht zum Verständnis des Bildes - dazu gehört ein korrespondierender (Wikipedia-)Artikel wenn das Objekt erklärt werden muss. Kategorien kategoriesien u.a. die Eigenschaften was abgebildet ist, wo es abgebildet ist und wann es fotografiert wurde.

Wenn man deinen Gedanken weiter folgen würde, jedes Bild(!) das ein Relief zeigt in der Category:Reliefs einordnen würde... wäre die Category:Reliefs mit geschätzen 100.000 Bilder reichlich voll. Reichlich voll und völlig unnütz.

--Atamari (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Atamari,

leider ist der Titel "Menschen in der Stadt" falsch. Ich habe mich auch täuschen lassen, der richtige Titel ist "Menschen im Gespräch". Als Beleg sollen die folgenden drei Links geltenː Bundesverband Bildender Künstlerinnen und Künstler BBK Bezirksverband Bergisch Land e. V. Drittes Bild von oben

Der Mensch in Holz geschnitten

Gesamtschule Barmen --J.hagelüken (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, vor allem der Link zur Gesamtschule überzeut. Ich habe mich bislang auf Ruth Meyer-Kahrweg: Denkmäler, Brunnen und Plastiken in Wuppertal (Hauptband) Born, Wuppertal 1991, ISBN 3-87093-057-8, Seite 412 verlassen. Ich werde als die Kategorie des Werks umbenennen/verschieben. --Atamari (talk) 19:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:19a Agios Titos wahrscheinlich das einzige Buch über die Basilika. Übersetzung-Erzbischof Kyrill,Johannes Kogerakis. Die Gemeinde des Hl.Titos, Die Nachfolge und die hl. Schriften, Heraklion 2004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C messier (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[:File:19b übersetzt Gemeinde des Hl.Titos, Verlag Melissa , 57021 Astrovolta Salonoki- ISBN 960-87955-1-6.JPG]][edit]

[[:File:19b übersetzt Gemeinde des Hl.Titos, Verlag Melissa , 57021 Astrovolta Salonoki- ISBN 960-87955-1-6.JPG]] has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:19b übersetzt Gemeinde des Hl.Titos, Verlag Melissa , 57021 Astrovolta Salonoki- ISBN 960-87955-1-6.JPG|its entry]].

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C messier (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:07 Dirx Holzschnitt Kreuzweg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Krd 15:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baum im Wandel des Jahres[edit]

Tolle Aufnahmen!
Hallo J.hagelüken,

mein Name ist Friederike Laus und ich bin Promotionsstudentin im Fachbereich Mathematik an der TU Kaiserslautern. Mein Vertiefungsbereich ist Daten- und Bildverarbeitung und genauer beschäftige ich mich momentan mit der Interpolation von Bildern. Bei der Suche nach geeigneten Testbildern für ein Modell, dass ich mit zwei Kollegen entwickelt habe, bin ich auf Ihre tolle Aufnahme eines Baumes im Laufe des Jahres gestoßen. Nun wollte ich fragen, ob ich die Bilder im Rahmen einer Veröffentlichung verwenden darf (Sie würden natürlich als Urheber der Bilder zitiert werden). Liebe Grüße, Friederike Laus (talk) 14:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Einklang.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Einklang.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:St.Suitbert 4 Altarkreuz Willi Dirx.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:St.Suitbert 3 Altarkreuz Willi Dirx.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:25, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Einklang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 00:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ambo Mauritusdom Hattingen.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ambo Mauritusdom Hattingen.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 08:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:05. Dirx,Willi, St.Antonius OB, Tabernakel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirx, W. St.Franziskus Bo. Kirchenfenster Chorraum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 08:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Einklang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 08:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:14.d Willi Dirx Marienbasilika Kevelaer Bronzeportal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:14.d Willi Dirx Marienbasilika Kevelaer Bronzeportal.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello J.hagelüken, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Ambo Mauritusdom Hattingen.JPG

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, - FitIndia Talk 15:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirx KF 10 St. Konrad Ge. Marienfenster Mariä Krönung.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirx KF 09 St.Konrad Ge. Marienfenster Maria Himmelfahrt.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirx KF 08 St.Konrad Ge. Marienfenster Pfingsten.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]