User talk:Jmh2o/Archive 6

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Maison dorée - 2022-01-01 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Watchduck 22:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - La Samaritaine-Porte de ville - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Postcards

Hello Jmh2o, thanks for uploading postcards. Maybe you are interessted in COM:WPPC. Best regards --sk (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Recherche d’info

Bonjour, il y a quelques semaines je vous ai contacté concernant l’église saint-Éloi, situé sur la place du nord. Pour un autre projet, je suis à la recherche d’informations sur l’église saint Basile de Couillet, et à ma surprise, vous êtes également l’auteur. Serait-il possible de savoir si vous avez d’autres informations sur l’église? Un grand merci, Coralie Jansen Mon mail: coralie.jansen.13@gmail.com 94.109.65.106 14:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Palais des Beaux-arts - 2022-04-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Pont Roi Baudouin - candélabre GHM - 2022-04-09 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Boulevard Tirou - Théâtre Marignan - 2022-04-09 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Eden - 2022-05-03 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Eden - 2022-05-03 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Eden - 2022-05-03 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Palais du Film - 2022-05-03 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - La Vigie hennuyère et la Cité juvénile depuis la rue Marie Danse - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - La Vigie hennuyère et la Cité juvénile - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - place Charles II - aménagement de 2022 - 2022-05-26 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Place Verte - 2021-03-27 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Blason de Marcinelle

Bonjour, j'ai une question Marcinelle posède un blason officiel ? si vous trouver se serai sympa de le faire pour la page wikipédia sur Marcinelle, merci? L'Élan canadien (talk) 00:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour @L'Élan canadien: Marcinelle n'a pas eu officiellement de blason. Et dans ma documentation, pourtant très complète sur le sujet en ce qui concerne les anciennes communes qui constituent la ville de Charleroi, je ne trouve aucune trace d'une démarche faite par la Marcinelle pour en obtenir un. Cependant, dans les livrets de mariage en usage dans les années 1970 figure bien un blason : tranché d'azur et de sinople avec un perron d'argent porté par des lions sur le tout. Perron semblable à celui du sceau communal de Marchienne-au-Pont File:Sceau marchienne au pont.png, mais avec une espèce de flamme à la place de la croix au sommet. Bien à toi. --H₂O^(talk) 09:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour, mais pourtant il en a aussi dans l'ancienne maison communale. L'Élan canadien (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

@L'Élan canadien: c'est très possible. Mais je n'ai aucune source d'une reconnaissance officielle pour celui-ci. --H₂O^(talk) 16:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Oui si vous avais un jour la source ce serait sympa. Regarder si les les sections de Charleroi possède aussi un blason. L'Élan canadien (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

C'est dans les articles de Wikipédia. Les sections qui ont un blason, même officieux, mais avec références, c'est dans leur article. --H₂O^(talk) 16:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Les anciennes maisons communales de Charleroi

Au sujet des photos des anciennes maisons communales sur commons, il faudrait des images de l'intérieur des anciennes maisons communale. pour que les gens voit. L'Élan canadien (talk) 18:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Où se trouve l'ancienne maison communale de Goutroux ? L'Élan canadien (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Pour l'ancienne maison communale de Goutroux, aucune idée, mais je peux trouver.

Pour les autres. Il faut y avoir accès. Et à des heures où le photographe amateur que je suis est disponible --H₂O^(talk) 19:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Vérification faite : pas vraiment de maison communale à Goutroux. --H₂O^(talk) 19:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Parceque il y a des photos de l'intérieur de celle de Gilly mais il en n'a une d'un vitrail dans l'escaliers d'honneur et dans le hall mais il y a pas de la salle des mariages.

Et de celle de Marchienne-au-Pont, Marcinelle, Dampremy, Lodelinsart, Monceau-sur-Sambre et Ransart non plus.

Pour l'ancienne maison communale de Goutroux il n'ou faut dire à un personne qui habitait dans la commune avant la fusion. L'Élan canadien (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Anciennes maisons communales à Charleroi, mais pour la plupart, l'intérieur n'est que peu ou pas du tout accessibles. --H₂O^(talk) 19:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Petite information, on en a fait quoi à l'ancienne hôtel communal de Gosselies ? L'Élan canadien (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

@L'Élan canadien: l'ancien hôtel de ville de Gosselies (voir cette carte postale sur Delcampe.net), était un bâtiment de style éclectique inauguré en 1875, qui se trouvait sur la place des Martyrs. Y était adossé l'école des garçons, l'actuel Centre Civique. Des dégâts miniers dégradent de plus en plus le bâtiment qui ne peut être sauvé et, devenu dangereux, il sera démoli au début des années 1970. --H₂O^(talk) 06:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

L'église de Dampremy

J'ai vu que vous avez publier six cartes postales de Dampremy avec l'ancienne église aujourd'hui démolie, je pourriez savoire si vous avez des photos de l'intérieur et de l'estérieur de l'ancienne église. Le Leprechaun (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

J'ai une carte postale de l'intérieur de l'église construite en 1873 par Justin Bruyenne. Une vue vers le chœur, un peu sombre. Je n'ai pas encore pris le temps de la scanner et la publier. --H₂O^(talk) 12:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Je sais que cette église quand a été terminée avait des problème au niveau du sol à cause comme l'ancien hôtel de ville de Gosselies des menace d'écroulement. Vous aver un image vers le choeur il aurait dû avoir des images de l'intérieur vers l'entrée et des autres sur l'église. Le Leprechaun (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Possible, probablement même, mais je n'ai pas trouvé des photos libres de droits. --H₂O^(talk) 13:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Et pour celle de 1979 il y a une de l'intérieur aussi vers le choeur. Il vautrait raflechir la galerie :). Le Leprechaun (talk) 13:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Je suis l'auteur de cette photo, mais je ne comprend pas ta remarque et ce qu'il faut faire avec la galerie. --H₂O^(talk) 13:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

De faire quelque photos actuelle. Le Leprechaun (talk) 13:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

C'est quand j'ai le temps. Et les églises ne sont pas toujours ouvertes. J'importe mes photos quand j'ai l'occasion de prendre un peu de temps pour cela (je ne suis pas encore à la pension . J'ai, au moment au j'écris, 7.643 fichiers importés dont la grande majorité concerne Charleroi. --H₂O^(talk) 13:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

La Docherie

Rebonjour, vous avez de la documentations et des cartes postales anciennes sur La Docherie. Le Leprechaun (talk) 14:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Non, rien... --H₂O^(talk) 14:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Peut-être un jour, si vous avait trouver contacter-moi. Le Leprechaun (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Eglise Saint-Eloi de Charleroi-Nord

J'ai une question l'église de Charleroi-Nord va être démolie ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 16:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Aucune nouvelle actuellement. --H₂O^(talk) 16:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Je sais quelle est fermée mais celle de Lodelinsart elle est toujour à moitiée détruite. Le Leprechaun (talk) 16:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Je suis çà de prêt, mais ce n'est pas une sujet d'article sur Wikipidia. --H₂O^(talk) 17:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Usines de la Providence à Marchienne-au-Pont

J'ai un nouveau projet d'un article sur les Usines de la Providence qui se trouvait à Marchienne-au-Pont. Le Leprechaun (talk) 17:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

C'est un bon projet, quoique ardu car l'histoire est longue, mais heureusement bien documentée. Attention, il existe déjà sur Wikipédia l'article Forges de la Providence qui demande à être complété. L'article existe aussi en anglais et en néerlandais. A travailler dans un brouillon et à construire pas à pas en utilisant au mieux les sources. --H₂O^(talk) 17:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Nouveaux articles sur Charleroi

Quelle serait les nouveau articles sur la région de Charleroi ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Tu regardes ce qui existe. Tu complètes les articles incomplets pour lequel tu as des documents et sources de qualités. Tu regardes dans ta document ce qui permet d'écrire un nouvel article. Comme je l'ai écris sur ma page de présentation, citant un autre utilisateur : « Ne venez pas avec une idée préconçue de ce que vous allez ajouter à WP, en recherchant ensuite des sources (ou pas le plus souvent). C'est l'inverse. Prenez dans votre bibliothèque vos meilleures sources, et recherchez ensuite dans Wikipédia les endroits où ajouter les informations importantes de ces sources. » Bonne continuation. --H₂O^(talk) 17:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Dampremy

J'ai vu sur des nombreux cartes postales que à Dampremy près de l'ancienne église de 1873 et de la chapelle Saint-Ghislain il y avais un château le château s'appelait le château de Crawhez qui se trouvait actuellement sur l'entrée du tunnel du métro-léger. Voici la photo

Le Leprechaun (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Je connais la photo. C'est moi qui l'ai publiée sur Commons. Et c'est exacte que le château a été détruit pour le métro. --H₂O^(talk) 17:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Ce château était au départ un château-ferme de la Famille Dumont et après et après le mariage le château devient le château Crawez, j'ai vu ça dans l'ouvrage de Albert Moret Les Origines de Dampremy. et j'ai une question c'est quoi le bâtiment en ruine sur la carte postale. Le nom est Pavillon Napoléon

Le Leprechaun (talk) 18:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Je ne sais pas. Un pavillon de jardin ? Disparu sous le terril de la Blanchisserie. Tiens, je vois que tu obtenus ta nouvelle identité. --H₂O^(talk) 18:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Oui c'est ça parce que ont voit l'ancienne église actuellement Chapelle St-Ghislain, pavillon se touve peut être où se trouve les usines de Thy-marcinelle ou se trouve les trois grande cheminées de Carsid. Le Leprechaun (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

L'histoire de famille Dumont fait parti de mes recherches dans des sources primaires, entre autres aux archives de l'état à Mons. Donc, non publiables sur Wikipédia en l'état. C'est l'implication de la famille Dumont (de Chassart) dans la construction de l'église Saint-Joseph de Charleroi qui m'intéresse. Un travail de très longue halène. Car je travaille aussi sur l'histoire de ma maison à La Planche à Dampremy. J'ai épluché, avec mon épouse, toutes les mutations cadastrales entre 1830 (date de début de leur existences) et 1921 (date limite pour la consultation libre). Nous publions les résultats par épisodes dans le bulletin trimestriel de la fr:Société royale d'archéologie, d'histoire et de paléontologie de Charleroi. --H₂O^(talk) 18:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Attand l'église St. Joseph c'est pas celle de la Broucheterre. Le Leprechaun (talk) 18:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Oui, je suis le dernier président de la Fabrique d'église avant la désaffection. Il faut lire la page sur Wikipédia de présentation de tes correspondant --H₂O^(talk) 18:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Pourqois l'église est désinfectée ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Désaffectée le 11 avril 2019 et vendue à un particulier qui veut la transformer en logements. Trop couteux à entretenir pour le nombre de fidèles. En accord avec les autorités ecclésiastiques (l'évêché) et publiques (commune et région). Comme c'était une église appartenant à la fabrique, c'est cette dernière qui a géré "en bon père de famille" la désaffectation et la vente. Depuis, j'ai intégré la fabrique de l'église Saint-Christophe (la basilique). --H₂O^(talk) 18:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Ils ont du la reconvertie en église protestante si dans la ville ou les environs il y a une communauté. Le Leprechaun (talk) 18:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Non, il était exclu que les lieux restent un lieu de culte de quelque religion qu'il soit. C'est la seule restriction dans la vente. --H₂O^(talk) 18:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Soite si il y a persone c'est le châtiment la démolition :( Le Leprechaun (talk) 18:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Eglise Saint-Joseph de la Broucheterre

J'ai une question quelle année a était construite ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

J'ai mis quelques notes là, mais ce n'est pas à publier car Travail inédit. Je suis occupé de co-rédiger avec mon épouse pour la publication dans un livre. --H₂O^(talk) 19:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

C'est sur quois ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Cliquez sur ce mot là pour accéder à une de mes sous-pages brouillon sur Wikipédia. --H₂O^(talk) 19:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Eglise St. Joseph de Jumet-Houbois

J'ai vus dans un ouvrage de Jumet que cette église a été construit par Auguste Cador aussi l'architecte de celle de Charleroi-Nord (St. Eloi), et bien cette église n'est pas achevée par faute de fond et que c'était arrêtée à la troisième travée. Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Mais à Jumet, c'est une église construite par la commune. Celle de Jumet à l'époque. C'est un peu à cette église, avec son petit clocheton en façade, que de devait ressembler celle de la Broucheterre avant la construction de la tour fin du 19e siècle. --H₂O^(talk) 19:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

J'ai trouver la date de la construction de cette église c'est en 1880, alors que jumet est diriger par un bourgmestre anticlérical et franc-maçon Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Sept-Douleurs (Marchienne-au-Pont)

Vous avez pourqois c'est devenu une église orthodoxe ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Marchienne-au-Pont

Vous avais des documentations (ouvrages, cartes postales) ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 17:36, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Bonsoir, voilà toute ma bibliothèque pouvant intéresser Wikipédia. Elle se complète au fur et à mesure de mes découvertes et achats. Je n'ai et n'achète que des cartes postales concernant Charleroi (6000), un peu Dampremy et Lodelinsart. Et rarement d'autres anciennes communes de Charleroi. --H₂O^(talk) 17:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Vous avez pourquois qu'on a détruit l'ancien hôtel de ville de Marchienne-au-Pont ? Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Casino du Rivage - 2022-06 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Château de l'Aile - 2022-06 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Château de l'Aile - 2022-06 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Château de l'Aile - 2022-06 - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Le Vevey - 2022-06-22 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Would benefit by adding GPS coordinates to image description. --GRDN711 12:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC) Done. GPS coordinates for ship location is approximate. --Jmh2o 13:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Charleville - immeuble moderniste (maison Dolpire) - 2022-06-29 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Château de l'Aile - 2022-06 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - quartier d'été 2022 - place de la Digue - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Charleville - immeuble moderniste (maison Dolpire) - 2022-06-29 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anna De Noailles - Vevey - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 11:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Anna de Noailles in Vevey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:44, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Le Centurion - 2022-06 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de l'Aile, view from northeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. It would be good to give the direction of the exposure of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Info done. I add the "Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland" template. --H₂O^(talk) 06:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
• Perfect for geocoding. It would be good to give the direction of the exposure of the image in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Question @Archaeodontosaurus: , bonsoir, je ne comprend pas bien ta demande. J'ai mis l'emplacement de l'objet avec l'orientation de la façade vue et l'emplacement du photographe avec la direction de la prise de vue. Que faut-il d'autres ou de différent ? Merci. --H₂O^(talk) 17:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Bonjour, pour une objet complexe les images sont totalement différentes suivant la position. Elles sont donc toutes éligibles en VI avec des scopes spécifiques. Dans ton cas il faut rajouter northeast exposure au scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Info  Done --H₂O^(talk) 06:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. Very good and useful image, often used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancien Hôtel de Ville de Dampremy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used. But I would add from where the photo is taken. -- Spurzem (talk) 14:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Info  Done, but the location of the shot is approximate because I don't have GPS on my camera and the information is therefore not in the EXIFs (Google translate). --H₂O^(talk) 06:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison Dolpire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question In France there will be a copyright on the architect, is it the same in Belgium? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus: In France there is no freedom of panorama, in Belgium yes. I added the FoP headband to the file, so there is no hesitation about this freedom. --H₂O^(talk) 05:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect (Vous avez bien de la chance en Belgique) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Centurion (Vevey) by Charles F. Morgan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• H₂O, please mention the name of the artist in the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Done --H₂O^(talk) 06:25, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks, and I agree that this is overall the most useful photo of the sculpture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château-ferme de la Torre (Mont-sur-Marchienne) West tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison La Fleur (Charleroi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Général Comte Letort - plaque.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais des Princes-Evêques de Liège Coat of arms of Georges-Louis de Berghes, prince-bishop of Liège.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Beautiful good image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Martin Guyaux - colonne Martin Ankh - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passation - Martin Guyaux - Charleroi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colonne Martin Ankh (Charleroi) by Martin Guyaux (aka Martin Ankh).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Charleroi - Asphalte-1 - Sozyone - 01.jpg

File:Charleroi - Asphalte-1 - Sozyone - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison Mattot (Charleroi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marchienne-au-Pont - maison rue Lieutenant-Général Gillain 74 - 2022-08-13 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - boulevard Roullier - 2021-10-09 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - boulevard Roullier - 2021-10-09 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Tour Bleue - 2022-08-24 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Peulle 06:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Tour Bleue et résidence Plein Air - 2022-08-24 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour bleue (Charleroi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. Maybe the right side can be cut.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
   Comment In its current version, the composition is close to the rule of thirds. --H₂O^(talk) 18:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Grenette - 2022-06-20 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 09:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Italie à l'approche de Vevey-Marché - 2022-09-12 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grenette de Vevey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vevey - Grenette - 2022-09-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction. --Drow male 11:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)  Done --Jmh2o 15:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok! --Drow male 19:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Lambert (Bouvignes-sur-Meuse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --LexKurochkin (talk) 20:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Façade of the Organ of Sainte-Waudru, Mons.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used. John Samuel (talk) 20:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Charleroi - station Janson - Gaston - 01.jpg

File:Charleroi - station Janson - Gaston - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 02:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison Dermine (Charleroi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - Bd Audent - Maison Dermine - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dampremy - Chapelle Saint-Ghislain - 2014-10-04 - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me if you remove the cropped leaves at the right border --Poco a poco 22:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC)  Done --Jmh2o 16:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:59, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annevoie - château - façade sud - 2021 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annevoie - château - façade sud - 2021 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château d'Annevoie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The two facades are different and can be promoted separately if you give the direction of the shot in the scope. You also have to put the geocoding in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Info Only the south facade is visible. There are pictures from before and after the restauration of this facade, restaurant end in 2021. But this is the same facade of the building. Geocode done. --H₂O^(talk) 08:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Merci pour l'explication --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mineur - Constantin Meunier - Charleroi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charleroi - polyclinique du Mambourg - institut Arthur Gailly - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Little resolution, but compo and colors. --Sebring12Hrs 08:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin d'Annevoie - Le Miroir - 2021-05-11 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted clockwise. --C messier 21:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)  Done but perhaps not realy good quality. --Jmh2o 16:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC) Use the house in the background as a reference point for the tilt. --C messier 19:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)  Done --Jmh2o 08:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:57, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)