User talk:Gunnex/Archive 11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 5 ← Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

No enough time!

You have deleted two files File:Ghom photo 01.jpeg, and File:YONOS.jpg, without giving me enough time (at least a week) to be assured for copyright violation, especially for yonos.jpg, which I can't recall.--Omar35880 (talk) 12:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Omar35880: File:Ghom photo 01.jpeg was (as indicated be my at you user talk) a Panoramio grab and File:YONOS.jpg was a similar case. I recommend to check local arwiki uploads for copyright violation before making a file transfer to Commons. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 18:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Billetes bcu

Please give me some help, those images certainly are property of the Central Bank of Uruguay and hence a guvernamental agerncy its use rights may be found on its page http://bcu.gub.uy , ¿do I really cant use them? they are too good for my articles. lets work it out, --167.57.35.88 19:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)--Neurorebel (talk) 19:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See below... Gunnex (talk) 06:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mate y tortas fritas

Is the only image that I "Have express permission for use on wikimedia by the presumed author, I ensure it. lets work it out, --167.57.35.88 19:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)--Neurorebel (talk) 19:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Neurorebel: the photo was taken from (as indicated) https://www.facebook.com/MatesEnLaRambla/photos/a.502631556466109.122056.502549716474293/1117308928331699/?type=3&theater (10.03.2016) but is circulating in the Internet since 2014/2015 via (example) http://lasmejoresrecetas.net/como-hacer-tortas-fritas/ (2015, Copyright © 2016 Las Mejores Recetas. Todos los derechos reservados) = http://lasmejoresrecetas.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/tortas-fritas.jpg, so the Facebook account "Mates en la Rambla" is most likely NOT the copyright owner and NOT able to authorize the free use of the photo.Gunnex (talk) 21:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then the author was unauthorizad to lead any permit as he presuntly did, sorry for that but i didnt knew. (The owner of "mates en la rambla" presumed himself to be the author of that image and granted to me a permit such he dont own)

¿How do know what you know? ¿HOw can I check for copyrights?

¿What about the billetes*-*bcu*jpg.jpg files? I really need those images. They obviously are gubernamental property, so... ¿wich law applies and who really is the owner? Eso quiere decir que no se pùede mostrar ningun billete de Uruguay em Wikipedia?--Neurorebel (talk) 22:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


--167.56.156.180 03:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)--Neurorebel (talk) 03:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Its funny because he said rouhgly translated from spanish: Yeesss you can take any image you want pal. Of course if theyre not theirs! --Neurorebel (talk) 03:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Neurorebel: Regarding the bank notes of Uruguay published by Banco Central del Uruguay we have bcu.gub.uy: "Condiciones de uso": "El usuario puede ver, trasladar a su computador, imprimir o reproducir total o parcialmente el material disponible en este Sitio, sin someterlo a modificaciones o alteraciones que impliquen menoscabo de su contenido, para uso personal, académico o de su organización, siempre que lleve a cabo tales operaciones sin fines de lucro y citando la fuente de la cual procede . (...)" (my underline = ND/NC), failing COM:L = publication of derivative work ("modificaciones o alteraciones) must be allowed + commercial use ("fines de lucro") of the work must be allowed.. Gunnex (talk) 06:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wooow Uruguay has a Stand alone cathegory!! so... Then if i understand well, I cant use those images here because they are non derivative non commercial allowed?--Neurorebel (talk) 21:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Neurorebel: --> if I understand you correctly --> right. Derivative work ("modificaciones o alteraciones) and commercial use must be allowed to host these files here on Commons. Gunnex (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you understood well, Is anything I can do?

Does that Implies that I cant show any banknote of Uruguay among Wikipèdia?--Neurorebel (talk) 22:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eso quiere decir que no se pùede mostrar ningun billete de Uruguay em Wikipedia?--Neurorebel (talk) 22:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Neurorebel: ... well, actual banknotes and coins from Uruguay may be probadly copyrighted. For older ones, please ask (before uploading) Commons:Café. Gunnex (talk) 23:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

where do I ask? All of the images are old banknotes and actually out of circulation, so can i use images of those if i find scans with suitable copyright?--167.56.10.5 18:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete reconsider please

Hi, please reconsider delete of the following file. In your delete request, you indicated that "Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF" but you are wrong; it is own work and the image was cropped, exif data was deleted, as I often do when sharing my images in a public setting: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kosher_switch_installed_with_timer.jpg

The other file you nominated is a screenshot, and I understand that this usually not be allowed. However, since I did not find any photo of the inventor of this device, I thought it's better to have it rather than not. The screenshot is from their video on youtube and in the public domain. Perhaps an exception can be made: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kosher_switch_founder_Andy_Menashe_Kalati.jpg

Thank you. Hash613 (talk) 15:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hash613: COM:PRP applies here, considering Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hash613. The Youtube screenshot which (btw) appears to be a reupload by you already deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:KosherSwitch founder Andy Menashe Kalati in Indiegogo campaign video.png is "© All rights reserved" via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdbkvJznmwU&t=21 (2015, © by "KosherSwitch") and NOT "(...) in the public domain". All these proven false claims of authorship/license/etc. are covered by COM:PRP and can be extended for other uploaded files.
Regarding File:Kosher switch installed with timer.jpg: "it is own work and the image was cropped, exif data was deleted" Well, then you are able to upload the original file, or?
Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex My apologies, as I'm new to the whole Wiki scene and rules. I thought since its on youtube its released to the public domain. For File:Kosher switch installed with timer.jpg I am happy to send you the original privately for confirmation but when sharing in public I delete exif. please let me know how i can send it to you. thanks you. Hash613 (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just upload the original under a new file name, so we can use it as reference, if necessary. Gunnex (talk) 17:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex Again, I'm happy to send you the original, for your own private confirmation (just tell me how to do that), but I do not like posting my photos with exif data into public sites. You're reason for deleting is ""Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF". Do wiki rules forbid removing exif data?? But in this case, you are wrong and I respectfully request that you reverse this decision or allow me to send you the file privately (I would leave my email addr here so that you can just email me and I can reply there but I also don't want my email addr public). Thanks you.Hash613 (talk) 18:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hash613: the unavailability of exif data leads generally to COM:PRP, combined with the user's upload history and other (technical) issues. You uploaded 3 files = 2 were (or are about to be) deleted, because of false claim of authoship/license/etc. In other words: copyright violatons. Or stricter: criminal behaviour. Bad ratio: 66,67 %. "you can just email me" --> you got email. Gunnex (talk) 20:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Received your email and replied. Thank you. Hash613 (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine. ✓ Done via [1]. Gunnex (talk) 20:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

errore caricamento foto

Ciao, ho caricato questa immagine e tu mi hai segnalato che manca la indicazione dei diritti. La pagina da cui l'ho presa specifica che la foto è rilasciata dall'autrici in CC BY SA. Come lo indico nell'immagine. Grazie --Susanna Giaccai (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Giaccai: Quite doubtful. Original (older) source (indicated by me) offers higher res. And why this? Why the false claim of authorship? COM:OTRS-permission from "Loretta Junck" needed. Gunnex (talk) 20:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
here yu can see hat the immage is relased in CC BY SA. This in not enuogh? --Susanna Giaccai (talk) 14:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Torino Natalia Ginzburg foto di Loretta Junck.jpg

Hi Gunnex, it's all right. I am an administrator here on Commons and a member of WikiMedia Italia. The photograph comes from a joint project of WMI and "Toponomastica Femminile" (Female Toponomastic) which is an association of women who promote the knowledge of the biography of famous women of the history of Italy, and is cooperating for improving the articles related to them on it.wiki. Two weeks ago some of us of WMI and some women of the association met in Rome, including the webmaster and the authors of some photographs, for a workshop about how to upload their own material on Commons and put the appropriate licence tags on them and so on. The photographs are correctly licenced because the photographers agreed to licence their photos in cc-by-sa as stated by the website of the association. Next photographs will be uploaded on Commons first not on the website. Regards -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Commons

Olá.

Estou indignado pois você me notificou por não ter provas da permissão para adicionar 8 imagens. Pois bem, venho me defender.

Em primeiro lugar, é simples checar que as fotos OA programa-Bike-Patrulha-PM-MG 160820140001.jpg, Bope5.jpg, MAC 1893-2.jpg, FUZIL-IA2.jpg, Fabiano Augusto Martins jpg1.jpg e Rj revista policiais233334.jpg são frutos do site fotospublicas.com.br, que disponibiliza exclusivamente fotos sob a licença CC-BY-2.0. Não sei como seria mais possível explicar isso na página do arquivo.

Em segundo lugar, a foto OFS 4579 treinamento defesa olimpiadas Foto- Omar Freire Imprensa MG.jpg é do site Agência Minas Gerais, site oficial do Estado de Minas Gerais, e uma postagem do site esteve disponível no Fotos Públicas. Veja: http://fotospublicas.com/mineirao-recebe-ultimo-treinamento-pratico-das-forcas-de-seguranca-antes-da-olimpiada/

Em terceiro lugar, a foto Gaucho 387 290 90.jpg e Arma Leve Anticarro.jpg são frutos do site do CTEx, do Exército Brasileiro. Os sites do Exército Brasileiro, como são do Governo do Brasil, estão disponibilizados sobre o CC-BY-3.0. Inclusive estarei mandando no e-mail , sobre a disponibilidade das imagens do site do CTEx. As duas últimas que postou no meu wall são do próprio site do Exército.

Passo os dias buscando imagens livres de direitos autorais para colocar aqui e ajudar que leitores tenham uma fonte séria e confiável sobre os assuntos de meu interesse, ao contrário da fama atual do site. Lamentável.

Obrigado. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matheus Daisy (talk • contribs) 21:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Matheus Daisy (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oi @Matheus Daisy: --> http://fotospublicas.com/termos-de-uso/ = Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 2.0 Genérica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.pt_BR = não compatível com COM:L.
"Os sites do Exército Brasileiro, como são do Governo do Brasil, estão disponibilizados sobre o CC-BY-3.0" --> Näo.
"que recebi a confirmação que tive, por e-mail" --> é necessária uma permissão do autor da obra/dono do direito autoral via COM:OTRS. O procedimento OTRS é decrito via Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder (versão resumida em português: Commons:OTRS/pt). O autor da obra/dono do direito autoral deve mandar por e-mail usando de preferência este modelo de mensagem + link para o ficheiro relevante) a permissão requerida para permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org. Se no entretanto os ficheiros foram apagados, a equipe OTRS pode (se sair tudo bem) restaurar-los.
Gunnex (talk) 21:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Dear Gunnex I have given a week of my vacation to produce a wikipedia page on Final program (Musical group) The owner of the copyright (Mr Richie Turnbull) has provided me with a picture of their album cover It has now been deleted.

I am a very inexperienced user and do not know how to undlete it Would you please help me

Mursillis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mursillis (talk • contribs) 12:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mursillis: if that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them, providing evidence that the copyright holder has given permission to publish the file under a free license. If everything checks out, they will restore the file, if deleted in the meantime. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license. Gunnex (talk) 20:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medaile2016.jpg

Hi, Gunnex, I went through the licensing forms several times and I succeeded at last. This file was somehow unintentionaly left behind. Let it be deleted, please. Thank you. Wishing you a happy day. With greetings Erempari (talk) 20:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

هفشجانی

This is my pictures I took at Tehran from Aboozar،Noorian and Eslamian also in Hfshejan.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by هفشجانی (talk • contribs) 08:56, 09 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@هفشجانی: Obviously not, multiple authors involved (e.g. "Alireza Akbari" + "MAJID-ZARAVANDI"), but if you like, fill a COM:UNDEL-request. Gunnex (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

جناب انسان! خودم این عکس را گرفتم. خودم این عکس را به این سایت دادم. این پرونده خودم هست. حق نداری چیزی که نمی فهمی متعلق به خودم هست را مرتب حذف کنی!!!

This is my photo! are you understand!???

File:افتخار بثورة 25 يناير.PNG

Hello.This image about a comment of a the One of users on the revolution.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: I beg your pardon? --> [2]. That's not your work. Please correct the date, the attribution and the license. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 13:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done.My image does not need to "cc-by" because it is a Screenshot, and I who made it.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zahran street in Amman.jpg

The source given for picture links to Arabic Wikipedia where it was specified that it is in public domain. --Makeandtoss (talk) 21:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Makeandtoss: And? Is uploader "Freedom's Falcon" = "Khalil N Shawish" (a professional photographer/FB)? Or is he/she "Rami Atwan"/"Bill Lyons"/"Ahmed Qarra Photographer"/"David Gurevich"/etc. --> see also local arwiki user talk... (serial copyright violator). Gunnex (talk) 21:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy to commons category in Arabic Wikipedia

Hi Gunnex, Thank you for your review. Is it possible to help me in a category? We have a category for pictures to move in commons in ARWIKI. I've deleted a lot of them or changed their license. But in the end, sooner or later, someone will move them into Commons. Is it possible to take a look on them and tell me if some of them can be deleted or not free at all. We don't have that expertise in ARWIKI and we are now discussing about limiting the upload to reviewers.--Helmoony (talk) 17:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Helmoony: Well, I can help out a bit, no problem, but my time for these tasks is quite limitated. See also the impressive talk page of a user who recently transferred a lot of files from arwiki to Commons (mostly my tags)... Or this recent DR of a arwiki based user = Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ahmad.aea.99. But the problems are:
  1. I am getting reverted by other users when I tag copyvios in arwiki. See file history ar:ملف:Nazareth-christmas market.jpg (2012, by Jobas, small size/no exif) = grabbed & cropped + watermark removed via https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeshehadeh/6521268785/ (2011, © All rights reserved by Mike Shehadeh). Or ar:ملف:Nazreth with pope.jpg... etc. So, why should I engage there? Will arwiki block me? See also my (ironic) comment at my local user talk, after gaining an "alert... See also this recent case. It's turning ridiculous...
  2. What [(semi-)automatic] tools arwiki offer to tag files as copyvio/no permission/no source/no license/deletion request etc.? E.g. Twinkle? Currently, I am tagging on arwiki only obvious copyright violations manually which is quite complicated for a Latin script based user from Germany :-) (actual example). Surfing quickly around category ar:تصنيف:نقل إلى كومنز ... (arabic script breaks all lines, see next line...)
...+40–50 % of all files in this category were probadly grabbed from Internet/social media or need more user input regarding sources/PD-status etc.. arwiki is also one of the "bad wikis" reaching deletion ratios of over 85,00 % from cross-wiki uploads --> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120867#2502002. I also already "cleaned" probadly hundreds of files transferred from arwiki, findable via e.g. this search. Summarizing: how do I tag locally arwiki uploads with no-permission/no source/etc. etc. or with a deletion request?
  1. ( = 3 --> arabic script breaks all sorting) "we are now discussing about limiting the upload to reviewers" --> I know that arwiki has adopted Fair use and arwiki copied all this stuff (more or less) directly from enwiki. Okay. I like the way how e.g. pt.wikipedia.org did it: they allow local uploads under a specific Fair use rationale (max resolution: < 501 px) but for (supposed) "own works" they are forcing (technically) the users to upload "their own works" image(s) directly to Commons. But... limitating uploads only for (as you said) "reviewers" (probadly/hopefully with more experience regarding copyrights) may be also a good starting point to reduce the amount of critical files from arwiki.

So... I 'll try to engage [sometimes] in files of the indicated category but... I – first – need more technical input how to tag the files locally on arwiki. Gunnex (talk) 20:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your long reply and the links furnished.
  1. I just opened a discussion about those images. It takes time but at the end it's gonna be quick with a consencus. The problem, from what I understood, comes from deleting pictures uploaded from palestineremembered.com. Let me some time to take a look in depth..
  1. For the semi-automatic tools. That's a big problem from small and medium non-Latin wikis. Tools are not always translated or updated for us. Even for Twinkle, we used to use it but after a bug no one was able to fix it. And now we are waiting (for years) for a geek. It's pretty difficult because in our case a need a geek knowing Arabic... To give an example to language gaps in Wikimedia, look at this task as an example. I'm gonna open again a discussion about that. There's a lot of pending discussions right now in the Arabic village pump.
  1. How do ptwiki forces users to upload free pictures on commons. Let me take a look in the upload page, .. Ok I got it, the link is quit hidden and at the end it's limited to some user groups. Yeah thank you, we have to review our upload page too.

I'm gonna contact you in few days to give you an update about what's going on. And may be then you can easily review the category. Danke. --Helmoony (talk) 15:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't wait, you can review this categry ;) --Helmoony (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
Well, dear colleague, you're not an administrator, but you are more active than 75% of them (together!) in tracking down copyright violations. Congratulations and thank you for your work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Christian Ferrer: Thanks for your kind words. I am currently relativizing my further dedication in Commons because (probadly like other ex-users) "I got wasted"... Well, let's see... Gunnex (talk) 20:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • And you're right. We are volunteer and I think an essential principle over time is "do only what you want, and do it only when you want it". It stay only to discover what you want...sometimes it's not so easy but it's essential for an extended period, really! and at the end this will help you become better. Search what your actions in Commons brings to you, but mostly you have to search what you want your actions bring you...
    I am reassured, you're not a bot, you are human!
    (lol) :)
    Thank you again. All the best, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Moshe Ha-Elion / Please consider to add it again to the article. The photo does not violate any copyright, since we took the photo.

Hello, dear Gunnex, I don't understand why you deleted the photo of Moshe Ha-Elion in his house in Israel from the Wikipedia article "Moshe Ha-Elion". That photo was taken by my husband (Eyal Streett) and I personally asked Moshe Ha-Elion if it was OK to use it and he agreed. I don't remember if I put as a owner of the photo my name (Antonia Tejeda Barros) or my husband's (Eyal Streett), because I was new in writing an article correctly and I didn't know how to do it (I did write an article last year but didn't do it correctly and the article was deleted). Moshe Ha-Elion is an Holocaust survivor who is today 91 years old. He was 21 months in Auschwitz. He is a writer, a voice of the Shoah and a friend of ours. I don't understand why it's not OK that his picture is in his article. Please consider to add the photo as soon as possible. The photo does not violate any copyright, since we took the photo. Thank you very much and many greetings from Spain / Antonia Tejeda Barros Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete all these photos? They do not violate any copyright, since I took them all with the exception of the one in Auschwitz, which is public domain. Please consider to add them again to the articles

Hello again, dear Gunnex, the same goes for all these photos. Why did you delete them? They are all correct. All the photos were taken by me with the exception of the Main Gate of Auschwitz I. I recently wrote an article about Auschwitz in a magazine and asked permission to The Auschwitz Birkenau State Museum for using that photo of the main gate of Auschwitz I. I credited it as in the article. That photo is in public domain anyway. I don't understand why did you delete it. The others photos are all taken by me (Colegio Estilo and En los Kampos de la muerte):

File:Main Gate of Auschwitz I. "Arbeit Macht Frei", 1945. Cortesy of The Auschwitz Birkenau State Museum.jpg And also:

File:En los Kampos de la Muerte by Moshe Ha-Elion. 2000.jpg File:Madrid, June 2016.jpg File:Prom Exhibition 2016.jpg File:Colegio Estilo 2016 Exhibition.jpg File:Colegio Estilo 2016 Exhibition (Madrid, June 2016).jpg File:Students Artworks.jpg File:Super heroes.jpg File:The Tin Soldier.jpg File:Exposición Estilo 2016.jpg File:Exposición Colegio Estilo 2016.jpg File:Inglés en el Colegio Estilo.JPG File:Colegio Estilo. Un colegio artístico, intelectual y laico, fundado por Josefina Aldecoa en Madrid.jpg

Please consider to add all these photos as soon as possible to their articles. It was a lot of work to write these articles and these photos are necessary. The photos do not violate any copyright. Thank you very much and many greetings from Spain / Antonia Tejeda Barros Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Antonia Tejeda Barros: All files were deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Antonia Tejeda Barros. You may use COM:UNDEL for an undeletion request. Note, that almost all photos were taken from social media (Facebook) and needs additionally (considering derived from artworks [indoor shots] made by other people) permission from the artists. And "(...) since we took the photo." --> who is "we"? One person holding the digicam and another person pulling the trigger?
For File:Main Gate of Auschwitz I. "Arbeit Macht Frei", 1945. Cortesy of The Auschwitz Birkenau State Museum.jpg you invented a taken date. It was taken by (so far) unknown photographer with unknown nationality "after the war" = 08.05.1945 — 28.08.2016, so the pubic domain status remains still unclear.
Gunnex (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Imagem de Arapongas

Favor verificar se a imagem postada na infocaixa da Wikipédia PT da cidade de Arapongas [3], cumpre realmente as licenças livres de utilização, conforme editor User talk:AppleApolo colocou na sua última postagem. Verifiquei que a imagem foi retirada de http://www.arapongas.pr.gov.br/galeria , mas essa página, em seu roda-pé possui a indicação "©2016 Diretoria de Tecnologia da Informação - Todos os direitos reservados". Abraços. O revolucionário aliado (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Rochelle

I'm still occasionally patrolling for this New Rochelle sockpuppet who keeps uploading nonfree images. I found another account, User:Sons4Sunder, who's already been blocked, but his images need to be deleted. Think you can help facilitate this again?

Best, ɱ (talk) 05:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now nominated here. ɱ (talk) 20:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Moshe Ha-Elion / Please add it to the article

Hello, dear Gunnex, I write you again about the photo of Moshe Ha-Elion that you deleted it:

'Moshe_Ha_Elion_in_his_house._Bat_Yam,_Israel,_January_21,_2016.jpg'

That photo was taken by my husband (Eyal Streett) and I personally asked Moshe Ha-Elion if it was OK to use it and he agreed. I don't remember if I put as a owner of the photo my name (Antonia Tejeda Barros) or my husband's (Eyal Streett), because I was new in writing an article correctly and I didn't know how to do it (I did write an article last year but didn't do it correctly and the article was deleted). Moshe Ha-Elion is an Holocaust survivor who is today 91 years old. He was 21 months in Auschwitz. He is a writer, a voice of the Shoah and a friend of ours. I don't understand why it's not OK that his picture is in his article. Please consider to add the photo as soon as possible. The photo does not violate any copyright, since my husband Eyal Streett took the photo when he went to Israel, in January 2016, to Moshe Ha-Elion's house. Thank you very much and many greetings from Spain / Antonia Tejeda Barros Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sockpuppets of Sigajefinho

Meu amigo essa categoria está prejudicando o desenvolvimento de uma wiki tão importante como a de Iraquara... A intenção é qual? É essa mesma? Parte das contas bloqueadas foram criadas por pessoas diferentes que apresentaram os mesmos arquivos, porque os arquivos de Bandeira/Brasão são simplesmente os mesmos (cedidos pela prefeitura). Isso é meio óbvio... Os arquivos tem sim domínio público, pois se trata de símbolos oficiais. Não me venha dar essa desculpa! Tô cansado de ver inúmeras páginas usando arquivos similares com as mesmas licenças dadas por todos os usuários bloqueados nela, isso por anos. Use o bom senso, Obrigado! --CEOINFO (talk) 22:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign to report copyright violations on Commons

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T148677

You wrote this back in August:

My spontaneous recommendation just to save the current situation: Cross-wiki uploads only for locally auto-confirmed users with at least +100 local edits + a campaign on local wikis (including technical improvements & instructions) how to report copyright violations on Commons.

I just saw someone complaining how "difficult" it is to report a copyright violation to Commons. I was confused, because I've had "QuickDelete" enabled for years, and with that, it's just a matter of clicking on "Report copyright violation" in the sidebar and filling in the simple form. But I noticed today that this isn't turned on by default. Do you think that could be changed?

An educational campaign doesn't require dev time, so it can be done whenever someone wants to. I can help get an announcement translated and sent to Village Pumps for hundreds of wikis. If you'd rather run a banner (like the Wiki Loves Monuments banners), then I can find people to help with that. Would you like to start that campaign? (Please {{Ping}} me.) Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If I have time, I can help translating this campaign into Tagalog for the Filipino community at tlwiki, tlwikibooks, tlwiktionary, pamwiki, ilowiki, cbk-zamwiki, cebwiki, and pagwiki to read. ★ Poké95 02:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatamidoing (WMF) and Pokéfan95: Thx for your posts. FYI: I am "offline" since 31.08.2016 and currently I would say: it's not only a wiki break. So [may be sound hard considering the amount of Mbytes I wasted on this topic]: do what ever you may consider helpful. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foto eliminada

Respondi na minha discussão pode por favor responder la de novo? Osório Caveirão (talk) 12:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Can you please delete the first version of this picture? Thanks. [4] --Makeandtoss (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
I would like to award you The Copyright Watcher Barnstar because you helped to keep Wikimedia Commons clean from copyright violations. Davidng913 (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wikiportrait category

Hi Gunnex, could you please be so kind to remove the Category:Wikiportrait uploads from these pages in your user space?

I tried to solve it, but I did not succeed. With kind regards, Elly (talk) 12:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminação de subpágina de usuário

Boa noite Gunnex. Qual a predefinição que eu devo usar para poder pedir a eliminação de uma subpágina minha de usuário? Até agora, a única predefinição que eu conheço é {{Copyvio}}, no caso de violações de direitos autorais. Marquinhos talk 23:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Como subir logos

Hola, escribo para pedirte ayuda. Me podrías decir bajo que licencia se pueden subir los logos de empresas comerciales y/o torneos deportivos. Saludos. Barú11 (talk) 20:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Best Wishes!

Best Wishes, Gunnex!
Hi Gunnex, I wish you all the best for the Holidays and a Happy New Year 2017. Yann (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleção de arquivos

Boa noite Gunnex. Primeiramente desculpe por trazer um assunto de 8 meses atrás, mas infelizmente não tive muito tempo para a Wikipedia esse ano e não tinha visto sobre o Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Luigii antes.

Sobre os arquivos File:Finish of the 2013 Copa América de Ciclismo.jpg e File:Breakaway on the 2013 Copa América de Ciclismo.jpg, ambas foram tiradas pelo Robert A. Lees (fotógrafo amador), que me enviou a permissão via e-mail (baseado nesta), a qual eu encaminhei para permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org. Acho que essas devem ser restauradas (se necessário ainda tenho o email que ele me enviou).

Em relação às outras imagens deletadas, são trabalhos do Ivan Storti e Jean Pierre Maylart (fotógrafos profissionais), tiradas do site do http://www.girodointerior.com.br. Na página em que as fotos estavam listadas, havia uma nota que dizia que as fotos poderiam ser usadas desde que houvesse referência aos autores originais, entendi que isso se encaixava na licença. Mas infelizmente a página mudou e não consegui encontrar nada nem no web.archive.org, então acho que essas não há o que fazer.

Obrigado, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luigii (talk • contribs) 02:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC) --Luigii (talk) 02:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FBMD files

Hi, Could you please update User:Gunnex/Per FBMD grabbed from Facebook (01.01.2016–27.08.2016) (part I). It was very useful, but it is not up-to-date now. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Gunnex, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Back?

Hello are you back? I am happy, I wish you a good day. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: Thx! More or less... merely surfing around ...unforeseen free time. A nice day for you too! Gunnex (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Marcação da imagem File:Cid Carvalho EBC.jpg

Prezado,

Quando carreguei tal imagem, a mesma ilustrava a matéria utilizada como fonte. Houve alguma mudança no site e a imagem não consta mais, portanto, está correta a eliminação do arquivo.

Sem mais,

Viniciusmarvin (talk) 00:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for the copyright Images

Dear Sir

Thank you for the message and i shall correct myself in future. To make it truth; i didn't intentionally upload the images however it was a relevant images for the content in the wiki page leaving the copyrights, am sorry for that. Now to get permission on Copyright images, can you advice how can i get permissions from the source for the relevant images I have uploaded / in future if required to upload any further images.

Also How do i know the images are under copy right protection.

Please advice. Thank You. Ashik. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 115.249.62.130 (talk) 11:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr

Can I add my Flickr images here if I am the original uploader but published them on Flickr on a different license or should I delete them there first? --The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 (talk) 06:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Ivory Cowboy: Hi! Did you read COM:FLICKR? If you are the copyright owner you may set & change the license of your Flickr files to a license compatibel to COM:L and upload them to Commons. Don't forget to tag your uploads from Flickr with {{Flickrreview}}. See also: Change your photo's license in Flickr. Hope, that helps. Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gunnex: This is a globally locked sock account [5], so if you see any similar accounts, you can report it to me on my talk, if they're not locked already. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Planta, e prospecto do Forte de N. S. do Monte do Carmo.jpg

Hallo Gunnex,

auch ich freue mich ebenso wie Christian über Deine Beiträge. Willkommen zurück!

Genügt bei dem Foto nicht eines der Old-Templates, ähnlich wie bei File:Planta do Forte São João (Vitória).jpg? LG --Hystrix (talk) 09:58, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hystrix: Danke für die Grüße. Bei dem Kunden (siehe auch Special:Diff/253914960 vom gleichem Uploader) ist mir irgendwie die Maus entglitten. Den Unsinn habe ich rückgängig gemacht. Danke für das Auge! Hinweis: ich war in den letzten Tagen u.a. auch hinter uploads (größtenteils ab 2016) her, die mit einer brasilianischen Quelle bzw. URL .com.br als Quelle versehen waren. In vielen Fällen war eine CC/PD-oder-was-auch-immer-Lizensierung nicht gegeben --> in der Regel checke ich die jeweilige Quelle – sofern ein Link angegeben wurde – teilweise bis ins wayback. Es sein denn, die Quelle ist mir bekannt (brasilianische Presse-Seiten/Portale etc.), dann drücke ich gleich den Knopf. Die Tageskategorien von Category:Media missing permission ab dem 23.07. sind daher an manchen Tagen etwas "voller" als gewöhnlich... dürften so um die +300-400 uploads betreffen... Gunnex (talk) 17:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

João Doria Jr.

So you've been adding the category Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change in some files, like File:João Doria Jr em reunião do PSDB.jpg, haven't you? What if I told you that the same file by the same source is available under flickr under a valid license? ([6])

I honestly wonder if you get paid to do this kind of job. Holy Goo (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I see you removed the category from the João Doria file. Now I need to let you know that ALL images from Agência Brasil are also on flickr. You might want me to go look for the flickr url for every single image or, more wisely, you can just delete the category since you know that all images are also on flickr. It's your choice. Which one takes the least effort and is more rational? Holy Goo (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Holy Goo: Thx for the Flickr source. See Special:Diff/254055691. Me and other are aware of the problem that Agência Brasil are inconsistent in there license policy. See also advice at Category:Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change (which is primary a maintance category, to reflect current status). You can help to clear some files if you are interested. Note that {{EBC}} is responsible also for {{TV Brasil}} which needs checks too. "since you know that all images are also on flickr --> no, I can't confirm this yet. Can you? Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can't say I'mm 100% sure, but as far as I remember, no image has been uploaded on their website that hasn't been also uploaded on flickr. The licenses are inconsistent, but that's because very few agencies or companies take copyright laws in an extremely strict manner like people here at Commons do. They are files made by our government, it's as simple as that. Well, there is no way I can put the flickr source in every single image. It'd take forever. Even if I put the flickr source in the images that are important for me, it would already be a ton of work. Holy Goo (talk) 18:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Holy Goo: Are you somehow trolling me? I also read your recent comments on ptwiki like "Duvido que eles serão inteligentes o suficiente para chegar a essa segunda conclusão. E depois dizem que sou nervoso" (pt:Special:Diff/49487168). Is this the trigger which already lead to an indef block ("Intimidation/harassment") here on Commons (which was cancelled later on by some individual action)?
If you want to help, check e.g. this image on related Flickr stream = File:Aloysio Nunes recebe o Xeque Abdullah Bin Sultan Al Nahyan 01.jpg. A spontaneous search at Agência Brasil Flickr stream was not successful. Try to get it – and I would be grateful. For all cases: unless we have a definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons. That is not a "extremely strict manner like people here at Commons do" --> that is treating normal copyright issues, considering Wikimedia Commons as a host of material that is licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose. Unfortunately, uploads from Brazilian users are (on average) mostly critical (probadly due to education lacks regarding copyrights). See e.g. my ongoing analysis via User:Gunnex/Cross-wiki uploads from pt.wikipedia.org.
In other words, Wikimedia Commons is daily flooded by hundreds of copyright violations – and thousands of them are remaining still undetected. So, please respect the work of users (including me), which are trying to keep Wikimedia Commons as a (for everybody) useful, free licensed database of all kinds of works. Thank you very much. Gunnex (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you were german, but now I see you have a good knowledge of portuguese, so maybe you even live here in Brazil, I don't know. I don't like it when people stalk me on other projects, but nevermind.

Anyway, look. The problem with Commons is that people here are extremely strict. Not even american government agencies like NASA are so strict. These contradictions (files with different licenses in different sources, like in this situation) happen often here because nobody really cares about these specific details. EBC clearly doesn't mind that we use their files (they even want us to use them) because they are a government agency, and that is more than enough. Now we're having problems on the portuguese wikipedia because people here intend to delete images of our own presidents that were taken by our own government! How insane is that??

Since you admit that the majority of files uploaded here are copyvios, why be so strict on files that are NOT copyvios (like the Aloysio Nunes file)? Look, all Wikimedia projects have a very bad reputation due to unreliability, so why don't you worry about all the tons of actual copyvios and simply stop fighting over minor details? That's what gets on my nerves. Nobody really gives a damn about these details. Holy Goo (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been here on Commons for months and honestly I don't think I'll ever manage to get into the spirit of this community. It's just too much for me. Have a nice wikibreak. I'm going to take a break as well. Holy Goo (talk) 01:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:DilmaCamisaPalmeiras.jpg

Hello, Gunnex! Please, see if you're right now. The photo is official of the Presidency of the Republic of Brazil and has been reproduced by several press agencies, since the use is free. I hope it's correct now. Sorry for my weak English. DanteCan (talk) 22:27, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey I just wanted to say thank for all the work trying to clean up the ABr files. That's good work! :) ~★ nmaia d 11:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change/checked

Die Hauptkategorie ist jetzt erstmal leer, d. h. die unfreien Bilder sind komplett aussortiert. Möchtest du die erstmal nur sammeln, oder sollen wir die jetzt schon komplett zur Löschung anmelden? De728631 (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @De728631: danke für die Unterstützung in dieser Sache! Den einen oder anderen Kandidaten konnte ich noch retten, aber für die derzeit 202 Bilder in dieser Kategorie (die ich nahezu alle mal persönlich in die Hand genommen habe) würde ich sagen: Löschantrag = OK – und zwar eher sofort. Willst Du den LA stellen? Als dringlich sehe ich noch die Entsperrung der Vorlage {{Agência Brasil}}, um dort einen Hinweis wie z.B. hier einzubauen. Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Die Sprachversionen außer Englisch sollten eigentlich nicht geschützt sein (DE, PT und PT-BR sind auf jeden Fall frei verfügbar). Wenn du magst, kannst du also dort entsprechende Hinweise eintragen. Ich werde dann mal die Massenlöschung anschieben und Template:Agência Brasil/en anpassen. De728631 (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
LA: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change/checked De728631 (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects without permission?

Hi Gunnex,

schon dreimal sind mir Redirects untergekommen, die von Dir mit No permission versehen waren. Die Weiterleitungen habe ich gelöscht und jeweils die Dateien mit dem entsprechenden Hinweis versehen (File:Pedro Pedrossian.jpg, File:Pedro Teruel.jpg und File:Luiza Erundina durante campanha eleitoral em 2016.jpg). LG und eine erholsame und erfolgreiche Wiki-Pause wünscht Dir Hystrix (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hystrix: (besser spät, als nie... :-)) das liegt an der batch-liste, die mir der VisualFileChange (VFC) zur Verfügung stellt, wo nur die ursprünglichen Dateinamen angezeigt und verschobene Dateien mit neuem Titel ignoriert werden. Insbesondere bei Massenabfertigungen fällt mir das daher dann eher selten auf. Schöne Grüße zurück! Gunnex (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hino Rio-Grandense.ogg

  • Francisco Pinto da Fontoura and Joaquim José Mendanha are mensioned as historical writer and composer of the anthem and acording the mentioned law they don't have the authorship rights of the anthem.
  • It's notable that each federative unity and municipality have it's own regulatory law about state and municipal symbols, respectively.

At your disposal for any clarification. Knight of The Knowledge (talk) 03:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thx for your comment. Please use only Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hino Rio-Grandense.ogg for counter-arguing, as I am watching the page. I responded to your comment there. Gunnex (talk) 19:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Câmara Municipal de Araraquara-SP.jpg

I would like you to remove this photo from the elimination list (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:C%C3%A2mara_Municipal_de_Araraquara-SP.jpg).

I changed the photo with copyright issues for a public domain photo, published on the official website of the municipal legislative body of the city of Araraquara (http://www.camara-arq.sp.gov.br/site/index.php/instituicao-mais-antiga-de-araraquara-camara-municipal-completa-181-anos/).

Renan Rabbit (talk) 02:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oi @Renan Rabbit: ver File talk:Câmara Municipal de Araraquara-SP.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foto deputado Chico Leite

Boa tarde. A foto do deputado Chico Leite (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Deputado_distrital_Chico_Leite.jpg) foi produzida pelo fotógrafo oficial da Câmara Legislativa do Distrito Federal (CLDF) e pode ser utilizada pelo deputado ou qualquer outra pessoa, desde que citada a fonte. Melhorei os dados da foto e espero ter sanado o problema. Grato. --Ramthum (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ramthum: --> http://www.cl.df.gov.br/chico-leite-2015 = Copyright © Câmara Legislativa do Distrito Federal. Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ver também https://www.flickr.com/photos/chicoleitebsb/25324054840 (©). Gunnex (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unban

hi can i get unbban again? Gyan333 (talk) 18:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gyan333: you were not banned, you were blocked for 1 week in 2016. So, read COM:POL (especially COM:L) again and go ahead. Gunnex (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ficheiros propostos para eliminação

Reparei que colocou para eliminação vários ficheiros carregados por mim. Todos os ficheiros propostos para eliminação foram-me cedidos pela Companhia Vidas de A a Z, daí que as mesmas imagens apareçam no facebook e na página oficial da mesma, tal como noutros sítios da internet. Algumas fotografias foram tiradas por mim nomeadamente e outras os direitos foram cedidos à companhia que me autorizou a usá-las, sendo que poderei reencaminhar-vos o email com a cedência de direitos das imagens a mim por parte da Companhia em causa Sílvia Gomes (talk)

 Info See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sílvia Gomes. Gunnex (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Resgate - montagem.jpg

Não, as imagens não são minhas. São do Luan Mateus. Ele me permitiu, à época, fazer o upload no Commons me passando os arquivos originais de câmera. Mas, naquela época, não sabia dos métodos de permissão via OTRS. Vou falar com ele e ver se consigo conforme solicitado. Saudações, Fronteira (talk) 10:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files page tab

Hello Gunnex, I know you likely often use reverse searching tools, and maybe EXIFs and metadatas viewers, I modified an existing script to have in each file page two links in a tab leading to [7], one link use the full resolution image address (in order to keep the EXIFs), and one link is limited to 300px thumbs (to allow reverse searches). Example with File:CAPTAIN BADR (ship, 1978). Sète cf01.jpg : full resolution and 300px thumb, from those pages you have access to a big number of tools, (including google reverse, bing, tineye...Jeffrey's Image Metadata Viewer, and many others...).

It was just for to notify that to you, if you're interested you can copy the two scripts in my Common.js. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Christian Ferrer: thx for the script --> tested, approved & looks good :-). Yes, I use also Jeffrey's Image Metadata Viewer (as an one-click browser javascript command) and (sometimes) other exif viewers. In the past I already used https://imgops.com/ in some rare cases but with the tabs it will be much more easier. Better workflow at all ;-) Gunnex (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for trying! I'm glad you like it :) Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
zzz … sleeping

This user is inactive until further notice.

moon symbol
This user is on holiday, temporarily has no internet access, or is inactive for another reason.
-- Gunnex (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

You should not get discouraged, what is happening? there is a lot of copyright violations uploaded continually, this is indeed a very hard and big work. You do a great work, but do no take that too much at heart, it is the continuity of efforts that pays. You should do less work, we need users like you, but in the continuity. That said, I was thinking this morning " it's a pity we are likely several users to check several times the same files, while at the same time some images, potential copyright violations, are never checked", as well as for the license reviews, we should have a template usable by authorized user, a template that said "no catches on the web" as soon as an authorized user made a reverse search with no results, in the purpose not to be 2, 3, or 4 users to make the same searches for a file...

Well, I think you should not get discouraged, but you do as you want, you're free of course.. :) Take care of yourself. :) Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I also take advantage of the exasperation you show in this DR to say you once again that you should accept to be administrator, you will thus have a lever of power to counter copyright violations flows. You will feel much less exasperated and victim. And you will save time both for you and for others by erasing yourself the files you have searched for and found the obvious evidence of copyright infringement.

To be honest, and sorry to be tyrannical, but if it was just me, and if I had this power, I will make you administrator without giving you a chance to say no. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich war so frei und habe eine Anfrage ([8]) beantwortet ([9]) und von Deiner Diskussionsseite einfach gelöscht. Der Bitte von Christian Ferrer kann ich mich nur anschließen (mein Haha wird Christian verstehen, wenn er die Archive Deiner Diskussionsseite durchsucht). Ich würde sogar weiter gehen als Christian, ich würde mein Admin-Posten an Dich abgeben aus mehreren Gründen: Du hast viel mehr Kenntnis von technischem Kram, von Copyvio-Suche und ich könnte in Ruhe weiterhin Blümchen und Käferlein einsortieren. Als ich zum Admin geschubst wurde, war ich mir der Konsequenzen überhaupt nicht bewusst. Die vielen Regeln kannte ich nicht. Das wurde mir zum Jahresanfang zum Verhängnis, als ich einen, wie ich fand, zu Unrecht gesperrten User entsperrte. Ich kannte bis dahin noch nicht die Regel, dass man den sperrenden Admin informieren sollte. Nach den Hinweisen auf mein Fehlverhalten zog ich mich einige Monate aus dem Projekt zurück. Mittlerweile bin ich innerhalb kürzester Zeit auf Platz zwei, nachdem Daphne den Posten abgeben musste, der Löscher aufgerückt. Es gibt allerdings auch viele ungeschriebene Regeln. Eine davon ist: als Admin kannst Du alles löschen, unerheblich ob es vorher eine DR gab. Nachdem ich ein paar Dateien per OoPS oder copyvio ohne vorherige DR gelöscht hatte, dachte ich, jetzt bekomme ich eine Klatsche von den Admins. Nichts passierte und dann sah ich in den Logbüchern, dass es einige der anderen ebenso machen. In der letzten Zeit löschte ich fast täglich Bilder, die out of project scope (persönliche Bilder) sind. Auch hier gab es bisher keine Rückmeldung (siehe meine Diskussionsseite), außer einem Dank von einem User, dessen Bilder ich löschte. Vor wenigen Tagen löschte ich eine DR von Dir, oder versuchte alles zu löschen, was in der Panoramio ID war. Es waren vermutlich 1140 Dateien. Dazu brauchte ich drei oder vier Anläufe per VFC, um alle zu erwischen (ich sehe schon, wie du mich auslachst). Mein Vorschlag: alle Uploads aof Commons sollten erst gesichtet werden (ähnlich wie in de-wp). Hystrix (talk) 12:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I find that the work is sometimes complicated, with complex situations and with difficult relationships, but that's also why it's interesting. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gunnex/Archive_11&oldid=266707794"