User talk:Eugenio Hansen, OFS/archives 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eugenio Hansen, OFS!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:18, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

POTY[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your interest in the 2009 Picture of the Year contest.Your vote got ineligible because you voted from an account ineligible for POTY2009. Votes from users ineligible for POTY2009 will not be counted unless they are confirmed by an eligible account user as their own before the end of each Round.

To vote

  1. You should log in;
  2. You shold have registered before 2010-01-01;
  3. You should have more than 200 edits before 2010-01-15T23:59 in any single Wikimedia projects.

If your eligible username is different from your Commons account, add explanation behind your vote; make your Commons userpage linked to your eligible account's userpage, and your eligible acount's userpage linked to your Commons userpage.

You can check your eligibility with SUL util and AccountEligibility tool. If you have any questions, you can ask at Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2009. Thank you.--Kimsə (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Eugenio Hansen, OFS,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Caledar date in heraldry 1912 06 26 on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 20:16, 29 May 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk

I understand that you want to delete it. But please read the above message, OK ? –Krinkletalk 20:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


Hi Eugenio,
is File:Wikileaks - A verdade vos libertara.svg, especially the addition of this motto, your own creation or did Wikileaks really use this logo? --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Eugenio Hansen, OFS!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By country categorisation[edit]

Can I remind you that the main world categorisation is "by country" as can be seen in Category:categories by country (flat list), not Category:categories by continent (flat list). The whole Commons world is organised on Commons "by country" (More than 5600 categories and growing every day): that is the current Commons standard. Moreover, political/administrative organisations don't map very well on continents: there are several countries that have territories on several continents (up to 6 , check en:List of countries spanning more than one continent). Categorisation by continents are just a side categorisation that should have no impact on the by counrty categorisation. Thank you for your good work. --Foroa (talk) 07:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yout upload is a duplicate of File:Ansicht Jesuitenkirche von Süden.jpg in inferior quality. --Felix Talk! 16:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ascension_Church_(Yaroslavl)_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MorganKevinJ(talk) 19:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duomo_(Milan)_at_night_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MorganKevinJ(talk) 19:42, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ascension_Church_(Yaroslavl)_Portal_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MorganKevinJ(talk) 19:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My file deletion nominations[edit]

The reason I nominated the above files for deletion, was because the law in some countries do not allow pictures to be taken of copyrighted buildings.(Commons:Freedom of panorama) I did not know that the buildings were in the public domain (their copyright expired). Now that I know that the copyright has expired I withdrew my nomination. MorganKevinJ(talk) 17:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Technically, In Russia and France there is no COM:FOP for buildings and artwork. BUT, if the architect or the author of the artwork or temple has been dead (morte) for 70 years (anno), then FOP/Freedom of Panorama NO longer applies and the building or artwork is now in the public domain or PD. Each country has different rules here. This is a guide for the lifetime of FOP in each country after the death of the original artist/architect. In China and South Africa (and many other countries), it is 50 years after the death of the original author/artist, but in Russia, Italy and France, the rule is 70 years. We have many pictures of the Eiffel Tower on Commons because Gustav Eiffel died in 1923 which is 88 years after his death in 2011 today. This exceeds the 70 year deadline. So, most images of the Eiffel Tower is in the public domain (PD) today.

For Communist China, FOP is not a problem since they have full FOP for buildings and artwork whether or nor the artist is alive or dead as it says here. They have full FOP for buildings and art works...like Canada. Its in countries like Russia, Italy, France or the former Soviet states where it is a problem since they have no FOP at all. You have to wait until 70 years after the original artist/achitect has been dead before the object or building is finally copyright free. This map shows which countries have FOP in Europe and what types of FOP they are. Modern art and buildings in the former Soviet states are Not allowed as the artists/architects are still either alive or have not been dead for at least 70 years. (since 1940) Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jeanne_d'Arc_in_Vosges_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link the author for an image file if possible[edit]

If you remember, try to link an author's flickr or panoramio account when you upload a picture...just as a courtesy as I did here Some authors want a clickable link to their account, too. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mater_Amabilis_Church,_Naucalpan,_Mexico_State15.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Tryphon 14:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mater_Amabilis_Church,_Naucalpan,_Mexico_State16.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Tryphon 14:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mater_Amabilis_Church,_Naucalpan,_Mexico_State14.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Tryphon 14:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint_Anne_Church,_Naucalpan,_Mexico_State00.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tryphon 14:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Wikileaks - A verdade vos libertara.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 16:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francis_of_Assisi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

69.96.216.234 01:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holy_Infant_of_Atocha_Chapel,_Gustavo_A_Madero,_Federal_District,_Mexico04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tryphon 00:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nebraska church windows[edit]

I see that you've just assigned categories to some photos of stained-glass windows that I've recently uploaded, e.g. File:Raeville St. Bonaventure apse windows S.JPG.

Could you please do the same for File:St. Leonard church (Madison, Nebraska) SSW saint windows.JPG? I don't know who is depicted in the window on the right. If you could identify the saint and assign the photo to the appropriate category, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

I expect to upload more photos of stained-glass windows depicting saints; could I ask you for help with them, too, once they're uploaded?

--Ammodramus (talk) 18:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Desgraciadamente, no hablo ningún Portugués. Por eso trato de escribir en Español. Pido su perdón por mis equivocaciónes.
¿Es la espada grande la marca de Ferdinand III of Castile?
Gracias por su ayuda con los fotos de las ventanas de las iglesias. ¿Pudiera yo pedir mas? En el categorio Category:St. Bonaventure church (Raeville, Nebraska) windows, hay siete ventanas qué retratan las obras corporales de misericordia. Aquel se dibujan incidentes de las vidas de los santos: por ejemplo, "Da ropa a los desnudos" se ilustra con San Martin y el mendigo. No reconozco las otras incidentes (tal vez "Da comida a los qué tienen hambre" es Elisabeth of Hungary). ¿Pudiera Ud. los fotos miran y poner en categorios por los santos?
Hay tambien un santo que no reconozco a File:St. Helena Immaculate Conception window apse E.JPG.
Si encuentro una pelicula de uso libre de una eremita medieval, le informo a Ud. Pero no es probable; saco la mayoria de mis fotos en Nebraska, de las ciudades o de los edificios historicos.
Otra vez gracias—
Ammodramus (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Acabo de leer un sitio de web sobre Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor. Creo que él es el santo de File:St. Helena Immaculate Conception window apse E.JPG. El sitio dice que él está frecuamente dibujado con la corona y con una maqueta de Bamberg Cathedral, que ha cuatro torres, como la iglesia que traiga el santo de la ventana. Además, cuando la iglesia de St. Helena fue construido, la mayoría de la congregación era alemán; por eso, es probable qué santos alemanes fueron representados.

Como modificar uma foto já postada?[edit]

Olá Eugenio! Sou verdadeiramente péssimo para lidar com figuras. Tentei colocar uma nova versão do brasão de Dom Jacinto Bergmann, um brasão arquiepiscopal, mas não consegui. Infelizmente não sei fazer várias coisas aqui, por isso já faço pouco para não cometer mais erros. Tentei colocar a nova versão, mas ela só aparece pequena na infocaixa, depois quando abre, aparece a antiga versão...não entendo. Te peço ajuda, por que vi a bela edição que fizeste a partir da foto que postei de Dom Jacinto. Grande abraço! Pvaf (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muito Obrigado![edit]

Valeu pelas dicas!!! Pvaf (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately,your upload increased the size of the file to 300% of its former size, without any explanation of what the changes were. Also, it's considered rather poor etiquette to remove source origin information. AnonMoos (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foto de Dom Jaime![edit]

Caro Eugênio! Olhando os artigos dos bispos de Pelotas vi no artigo de Dom Jayme Henrique Chemello que há uma foto do bispo que não corresponde a ele. Aquele bispo que foi fotografado é Dom Jaime Pedro Kohl, Bispo da Diocese de Osório. Há uma pequena troca entre os Jaimes. Abraço! Pvaf (talk) 13:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uma Coruja de 3 asas ???[edit]

Ja widzę dwa skrzydła i ogon, bo chyba sowa ma ogon. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 09:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Proszę nie poprawiać i nie nadpisywać moich plików. Proponuję wykonanie od podstaw własnej wersji i przesłanie jej jako wersji alternatywnej. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Danserindebrønden .jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Francis_of_Assisi_Mural_in_Iselin_000_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francis_of_Assisi_Mural_in_Iselin_001_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:56, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


Nomes muito compridos[edit]

Caro Eugenio Hansen,

Parabéns por suas contribuições, são ótimas. Porém, ao carregar um arquivo ou uma categoria e dar um nome a estes, não precisa ser tão específico na localização, como você fez "Igreja Mont'Serrat em Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil". Basta "em Porto Alegre", caso haja, no Brasil ou no mundo, outra "Igreja Mont'Serrat". Nomes muito compridos são visualmente horríveis, não acha? 15:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Felisberto (talk)

File:Église_Saint-Pierre_de_Firminy_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grcampbell (talk) 20:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Filenames[edit]

Please do not give files names like '' Methodist ''.JPG and '' Library ''.JPG -- AnonMoos (talk) 07:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing it again, with filenames like " Immaculata ".jpg and " Immaculata 01 ".jpg . I don;t have the patience or interest to request that they all be renamed, but you should really avoid such names... AnonMoos (talk) 08:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you left a notice on my user talk page when I had nothing to do with that image... AnonMoos (talk) 07:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put a rename tag on '' Library ''.JPG because it was an inappropriate name. You can look at Commons:File renaming... AnonMoos (talk) 08:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why, why, why do you put quote marks in filenames??????????[edit]

You did it again just now with " Igreja São Jorge em Porto Alegre " 0025.JPG! There are only rather limited circumstances when quote marks should be used in filenames, and that isn't one of them. I don't have the patience or interest to closely monitor and clean up after you, so it would be best if you would avoid such situations in future. AnonMoos (talk) 07:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hate to be perpetually nagging, but...[edit]

Yet more examples of inappropriate quote marks in filenames: File:" Assisi " 0014.jpg, File:" Basilica di San Francesco (Assisi) Sacro Convento ".jpg, etc. AnonMoos (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth of Aragon or Elisabeth of Hungary?[edit]

I don't know. Ask Otourly ? Sorry for my bad english. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 09:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I searched and asked help about and you're right. She is Elisabeth de Hongrie. source in French ( Les Saints - Rosa Giorgi - 2003-2004 - page 114 - ISBN 2 85025 856 3 ) Otourly (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:"_Francis_of_Assisi_and_the_Wolf_of_Gubbio_".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 07:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:"_Carol_Grotnes_Belk_Library_&_Information_Commons_"_04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would really be best not to include quote marks in file names!!! AnonMoos (talk) 04:18, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not include quote marks in filenames without a good reason (which there isn't in this case). AnonMoos (talk) 02:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Saint Nicholas of Tolentino Church, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Ginés90 (talk)

Criar nova categoria[edit]

Voce poderia me ajudar e criar uma nova subcategoria em Viamão. "Escolas em Viamão". Desde já grato.--Paulo rsmenezes (talk) 13:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado. Vou começar a colocar a localização das fotos, valeu pela dica. Outra coisa, poderiam inserir a ferramenta de geolocalização no UploadWizard, no estilo do upload do Panorâmio. Se tiver como, repassa a sugestão para quem desenvolve a ferramenta.--Paulo rsmenezes (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

re Black Cat .svg[edit]

Should be fixed now! :) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganizar categorias[edit]

Poderias ajudar a reorganizar a categoria Nature of Rio Grande do Sul Pensei em algo assim:

Category:Nature of Rio Grande do Sul
Category:Animals of Rio Grande do Sul (Transformar em categoria Meta)
Category:Birds of Rio Grande do Sul
Category:Fish of Rio Grande do Sul
Category:Insects of Rio Grande do Sul
Remover Category:Birds of Rio Grande do Norte, esta em local errado.

Desde já, grato. --Paulo rsmenezes (talk) 20:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re User talk:Cirt/Archive 1[edit]

Please, don't edit the archives. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 01:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

O problema não está no licenciamento da imagem original, mas sim na falta de qualquer indicação dessa licença na página da imagem aqui no Commons. Neste caso, é preciso colocar a licença {{Cc-by-2.0}} na página da imagem, para condizer com a licença que está no Flickr. Nota que o processo seria mais fácil se a licença apropriada tivesse sido seleccionada no momento do upload. Abraço, Waldir talk 22:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bobblehead Mister Spok .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kaldari (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugenio, you need to provide the name of the sculptor and his life dates, so that we can assess whether this sculpture is still copyrighted or not. --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheikh Isa Bin Salman Library And Conference Centre .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from England[edit]

Oi, Eugenio. Eu tenho usado a sua fotografia da Irmã Rosália Sehnem na página sobre freiras. Eu queria mostrar o que as freiras olhar como no século 21. Espero que gostem dessa contribuição.[1] Francis Hannaway (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:0001 Anthony of Padua .JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Mendes.svg ou Mendes Dantas[edit]

Tenha em consideração que esta imagem não tem função alguma numa enciclopédia, na vida ou nos céus. Por ser um ataque pessoal, eu o recomendo de refazê-la ou apagá-la. E porquê não pedir também penitência Kim richard (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bras%C3%A3o_ficticio_de_Daniel_Mendes.svg

Foi respondido e a tŕeplica apaguei por trollagem

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 22:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Brasão ficticio de Daniel Mendes.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kim richard (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré - Archange St Michel .jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 22:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests[edit]

It looks like you haven't suggested a new name for File:Fracis of Assisi Meditator .JPG and 5 other related images. The name in the rename request is the same as the current file name. The files are in Category:Redundant media renaming requests. INeverCry 19:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noted that the name says Fracis of Assisi, shouldn't that be Francis? - Cheers, Taketa (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Eevtotmeitme9tie.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Funfood 10:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Pelas suas inestimáveis contribuições neste projecto. Darwin Ahoy! 02:45, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Encontro em PoA sábado[edit]

Olá, Eugenio. Confirmamos o local do WikiEncontro, será sábado a partir das 19h. Veja o local aqui. Seria legal se pudesse vir! --Tom (talk) 03:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Eugénio! Basta copiar o código da barnstar e colar na página de usuário, penso que funciona bem assim. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 13:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Stigmatisation in heraldry has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kiltpin (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:John Forrosuelo Du.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Templo del Hospital, Acámbaro, Estado de Guanajuato, México 01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 12:26, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony of Padua[edit]

The saint in the photo is Anthony of Padua, it's evident looking at the lily lying at the foot of the table. --Cassinam (talk) 09:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:0000 Antonio of Saint Anne Galvão Chapel, Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil .JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 17:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Statue of Francis of Assisi in San Mateo County, California.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:0000 Antonio of Saint Anne Galvão Chapel, Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil .JPG[edit]

Oi. O que acha de dizer isso ao que propôs a eliminação? Seria mais fácil, acredito eu. Estarei vigiando a proposta de eliminação. Érico Wouters msg 15:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Saint Francis of Assisi Church, Celaya, Guanajuato State, Mexico 39.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 03:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico .jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico 00.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico 01.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico 02.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico 03.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico 04.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico 05.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico 06.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Our Lady of Guadalupe Shrine, Aguascalientes City, Aguascalientes State, Mexico.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Unificar categorias[edit]

Olá, Eugenio. Antes de mais nada, peço-te que não voltes a enviar a mesma mensagem a vários editores simultaneamente como fizeste aqui, aqui, aqui e aqui (além de na minha página de discussão). Isso mostra desrespeito ao tempo de cada um deles, que desconhecendo as outras mensagens, irá investir algum tempo a tentar responder à tua mensagem.

Quanto às categorias, nota que w:John the Evangelist diz: "It is also debated whether John the Evangelist is the same as St. John the Apostle", e w:John the Apostle diz: "Some modern scholars have raised the possibility that John the Apostle, John the Evangelist, and John of Patmos were three separate individuals". Logo, não parece ser boa ideia fundir as categorias.

Waldir talk 05:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, Eugenio. Desculpe a demora, mas acredito que o Waldir já respondeu a sua pergunta. Boas, Érico Wouters msg 17:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:" Baku Library ".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 03:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Eugenio Hansen, OFS.svg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eugenio Hansen, OFS.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Eugenio Hansen, OFS.svg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Francis of Assisi Church, Apodaca, Nuevo León, Mexico 02.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, je viens de redresser les perspectives de cette photographie, je désirais votre avis afin de savoir si les proportions sont bonnes ou bien s'il faut annuler cette correction. Merci Cordialement François

Oi, eu endireitei há pouco as perspectivas desta fotografia, eu quis sua opinião para saber se as proporções são boas ou se é necessário exterminar esta correção. Obrigado Cordialmente François

Français : Merci de votre réponse, je continuerai à traiter cette série, lorsque le temps me le permettra. Cordialement. François
Português: Obrigado por sua resposta, vou continuar a tratar desta série, quando o tempo permite, a Mim o fizestes. Cordialmente. François (Tradução por computador )

File:Observatório Astronômico da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul .JPG[edit]

Boa noite, a correção foi terminada. Eu espero que o vestirá. Cordialmente François de Dijon (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, la correction a été effectuée. J'espère que cela vous conviendra. Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Jaime Pedro Kohl.jpeg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jaime Pedro Kohl.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olá, esta pequena mensagem para informar que acabei de colocar on-line várias fotografias de vitrais de Notre-Dame de Dijon, uma de São Francisco de Assis. Desejo-lhe um bom dia. Cordialmente.François de Dijon (talk) 11:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, ce petit message afin de vous informer que je viens de mettre en ligne plusieurs photographies de vitraux de l'église Notre-Dame de Dijon, dont une de Saint François d'Assise. Je vous souhaite une bonne fin de journée. Cordialement.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%89glise_Notre_Dame_de_Dijon_Saint_Fran%C3%A7ois_d%27Assise.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kateri Tekakwitha.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sarah (talk) 02:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Albert Einstein Post Card (fake).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

c y m r u . l a s s (talk me, stalk me) 19:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eugenio Hansen, OFS. You have new messages at Cymru.lass's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

c y m r u . l a s s (talk me, stalk me) 22:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Eugenio Hansen, OFS (logo alternativo).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugenio Hansen, are you really the original photographer of the portrait of 1) Luciano Mendes, 2) Leonardo Boff, 3) Friedrich W. J. Schelling, 4) Karl Rahner, 5) Luís Carlos Prestes, 6) John Dewey, 7) John Erskine, 8) the photo associated with Papa Francisco, 9) the sculpture of Giacomo Leopardi, 10) the sculpture of Voltaire, etc. ? If not, what are the sources? --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind to reply or do I need to open a DR? --Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Eugenio Hansen, if you use the work of another person (dead or alive, Commons user or not) for an own work, you need to credit him/her in the source and author entry; this is a moral and often also a legal duty. I have now corrected the source and author entries for this image. Please check all your similar uploads for this problem and correct them as soon as possible. --Túrelio (talk) 06:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with File:Plutarco - Não preciso de amigos que mudem quando eu mudo e concordem quando eu concordo - A minha sombra faz isso muito melhor.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Eugenio Hansen, OFS - logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:O que suceder à terra, sucederá também com os filhos da terra. Chefe Seattle.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:O que suceder à terra, sucederá também com os filhos da terra. Chefe Seattle.svg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not again claim a derivative as solely "own work" when in fact you have taken it from somebody else. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

shots of glass-art[edit]

Hi Eugenio Hansen, as the following photos were taken from inside and thereby are likely not covered by any freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright, we need information about who is the glass artist and when (year) these windows have been installed.

--Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is the original drawing completely your own work or did you reproduce an existing drawing? --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please add the date (year) when this photo had been shot. --Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

#invoke:Autotranslate Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source and author of drawing is missing from description. --Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please add name of sculptor/artist, who created the tabernacle front, to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 13:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the painter and when his it been created (or the church been opened)? --Túrelio (talk) 13:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs of artworks of others are only legitimate if the terms for freedom-of-panorama are met. In addition, you then always have to add the appropriate FOP-warning template. Don't forget this in the future. --Túrelio (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, were the 2 graphic elements in this composition drawn by yourself? --Túrelio (talk) 19:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the sculptor of these sculpture? In what location are they installed? --Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the painter of this painting? When has it been created? --Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

who is the sculptor?[edit]

--Túrelio (talk) 21:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Navegar é preciso, viver não é preciso.svg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Bloch-photo is missing. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Origins of this image[edit]

What is the origin of this image File:Library science symbol .svg? It looks like an ancient symbol for library science, but i cant find any other sources for it. did you come up with this yourself? its very nice, and would be good to use somewhere. I notice there are other versions of it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then Brazil gets my award for nation of the day. what a great symbol, much better than an image of someone reading. very evocative: the light can be the actual lights in the library, or the idea of a light shining on knowledge, the librarians eye for sheltering and organizing knowledge. thanks for the lesson.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:


Template:Autotranslate I'd like to be wrong, but... Yann (talk) 08:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talkback

Template:Autotranslate Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Antiga Matriz de Porto Alegre[edit]

Bom dia Eugênio! tenho acompanhado suas grandes contribuições em fotografias sobre prédios históricos e igrejas. venho para saber se vc tem conhecimento de ter sobrevivido algum espólio da antiga Matriz de Porto Alegre? o historiador Athos Damasceno, escrevendo em 1971, disse ter visto guardados na cripta da nova Catedral importantes elementos decorativos da velha igreja, incluindo várias obras de arte como pinturas e estatuária, partes dos altares entalhados, a cruz de ferro da fachada e outras peças. você sabe se isso ainda existe? suponho que vc como franciscano talvez conheça o pessoal da Cúria, e talvez seja fácil vc descobrir se o material descrito pelo historiador sobreviveu até hoje e conseguir imagens desse acervo tão importante e tão desconhecido. eu já escrevi para a Catedral mas não sei se haverá retorno. vc não tem interesse nesse caso? se tiver, entre em contato comigo. um abraço! tetraktys (talk) 20:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bá, que situação! eu ando extremamente surpreso e indignado com essas atitudes irracionais de altas autoridades da igreja. creio que o caso vai ser difícil. eu também já tive experiências incompreensíveis de recusa em responder e descaso documentado em intervenções sobre edifícios históricos eclesiásticos, já me incomodei muito com isso. se quer ver o último caso, siga o link. em resumo, subi todos os degraus da hierarquia e deixei recado até no twitter do papa, e não consegui a resposta que buscava, e por razão absolutamente nenhuma. é totalmente incompreensível, numa época em que a igreja deveria estar se esforçando em ser transparente e acessível, diante de tantas críticas que vem recebendo, e perdendo prestígio, credibilidade e fiéis nesse processo!... mistérios da vida! eu tinha muita esperança neste novo papa, mas agora já ando esmorecendo. mesmo assim, continue com suas contribuições, é um patrimônio iconográfico admirável o que vem construindo e doando à população.
obrigado pela resposta, talvez tenha restado mesmo bastante coisa. eu ouvira boatos de que esse acervo havia sido disperso há poucos anos. um abraço! tetraktys (talk) 04:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

realmente não conhecia o ICAR. no entanto, para que serve a hierarquia? mesmo que não haja ingerência direta, se um arcebispo recomenda certa atitude, creio que tenderia a ser ouvido. não é assim? mas apelar ao bispo não adiantou, nem ao bispo de roma, e estamos abandonados à misericórdia divina, que tem sido avara neste campo, haja vista a massiva degradação de bens históricos sacros neste país. a igreja tem grande culpa nisso, pois é dona de bens que pela sua importância cultural extrapolam sua propriedade jurídica e passam a pertencer espiritualmente ao coletivo. pelo menos este é o entendimento dos especialistas do que constitui patrimônio histórico. tanto é assim que o Estado se atribui não só o direito mas também o dever de sobrepujar o sacrossanto direito de propriedade privada para preservar bens de interesse coletivo excepcional, através do tombamento ou registro em listas de interesse. esses bens são parte da identidade e da história de um povo, e não somente de uma religião. é nisso que erra a igreja, que pensa que é dona de tudo o que possui legalmente, que esse patrimônio só serve aos seus interesses e pode ignorar ultramontanisticamente as leis da nação onde assenta seus templos. hoje há leis no brasil que determinam penalidades para quem provoca degradação de bens reconhecidos como de interesse patrimonial. no pleito que levantei alguns bens degradados são protegidos pelo plano diretor do município e outro foi tombado pelo estado, e não poderiam ser modificados como foram e provavelmente continuarão sendo, com a conivência até do IPHAE. a igreja tem meios suficientes para conservar seus bens históricos para o bem da comunidade que ela prega proteger e fomentar. se não tem meios, está administrando mal esse patrimônio, cujo valor material é simplesmente incalculável, e cujo potencial de transformação em lucro através de turismo e marketing é altíssimo igualmente. há países que vivem basicamente de turismo cultural e o vaticano se não me engano é um deles! a evangelização pode ser fundamental, mas a conservação o patrimônio também é, e o próprio vaticano reconheceu recentemente em documento oficial a arte e a cultura material como instrumentos valiosos de evangelização, e a necessidade de receber cuidados especializados. mas de fato ele apenas ratificou o que desde a contra-reforma ficou mais do que explicitado para todos, e já era uma realidade prática desde muito antes.

hoje em dia, em que o tema está na moda e virando lei, deixar o patrimônio se perder ou adulterar, perdendo valor, no mínimo é um tiro que a igreja dá no próprio pé. e todas essas altas autoridades já deviam estar carecas de saber que conservação preventiva é muito mais barata que restauro. e, parece, não têm a coragem de reconhecer que está errando, sendo impossível que um bispo desconheça pelo menos o básico sobre o tema. ou seja, a igreja fechou-se na torre do orgulho. o que me deixa maluco é essa postura intocável que a igreja tem assumido nesse campo, e as contradições entre seu discurso e sua prática. mas a discussão se alonga demasiado. vc tem conhecimento de tudo isso e não tem nada a ver com eles rsrs. eu só fico triste, vendo se perder monumentos insubstituíveis a troco de simulacros estapafúrdios e explicações mais cara de pau impossível. em minha cidade, caxias do sul, já estou me tornando persona non grata de tanto incomodar as autoridades, mas os casos absurdos se multiplicam e não adianta falar nem comprovar os protestos com estudos de doutores em conservação ou da própria unesco: entra por um ouvido e sai pelo outro rsrsr é dose! que a luz de cristo ilumine o clero, que estão precisando! eu (ainda) me considero católico, mas ando querendo voar no pescoço das autoridades rsrsrsrsrs abração! tetraktys (talk) 10:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

olá Eugênio! vc sabe se esta peça é da antiga Matriz ou é uma cópia neobarroca dos anos 30? eu nunca vi! está em um local acessível? isso é um toalete?

um abraço! tetraktys (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Derivemos![edit]

Ficou interessante... Que bom esteja sendo usada! Abraços e sinta-se à vontade para usar alguns desenhos que porventura ainda tenham "sobrevivido" por aqui! André Koehne TALK TO ME 11:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Commons:Picture of the Year/2013/MessageR2/en

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Motopark (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Motopark (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Motopark (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Motopark (talk) 05:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Identificação de bandeira e outros[edit]

Preciso de tua ajuda para identificar esta bandeira File:Igreja Nossa Senhora dos Navegantes em Arambaré 012.JPG e como notei que tens muitas fotografias de Porto Alegre, poderias me ajudar a impedir que apagassem essas categorias que criei Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/08/Porto Alegre building categories. Uso Porto Alegre como exemplo para outras cidades e a falta de uma referência iria me dificultar bastante a categorização. O argumento para a apagar é que estão vazias, já preenchi várias mas como viajo com frequencia ao interior não tenho tempo para preencher todas. O outro argumento usado carece de lógica "hipercategorização" e não levei em conta. O próprio commons pede que se coloque em categorias o mais próximo possível. Desde já, grato. PS: Eu não inventei categorias novas, copiei o estilo usado nos EUA.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 13:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Por partes
  • 1- Obrigado pela ajuda com a bandeira do Vaticano.
  • 2- A ajuda que preciso é que se tiveres fotos das categorias que eles querem apagar, upa elas que deixarão de ser vazias e não poderão ser apagadas.
  • 3- A categorização não é automática, necessita criar uma categoria com o teu nome em Category:Photographs by photographer e categorizar as tuas próprias fotos. Fica mais facil de saber quantas fotos ja upou. Da um bocado de trabalho com as fotos antigas, pois tem que adicionar a categoria em cada foto. Não sei se tem um jeito de automatizar, tentei contato com programadores da wiki sem sucesso.
  • 4- Nem sempre da para saber o nome da igreja, costumo visitar as cidades no sábado e as igrejas estão fechadas. Alem disso muitas igrejas não possuem uma placa com o nome e as pessoas do local muitas vezes não sabem informar. As vezes nem consigo determinar se é uma igreja católica ou de outra religião devido a falta de indicações.
  • 5- Se quiseres renomear as igrejas que fotografei com o padrão que indicastes, sinta-se a vontade. É só criar a nova categoria, categorizar e indicar a categoria antiga para deleção.
  • Obrigado pela atenção.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 22:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Commons:Picture of the Year/2013/Results/R2/msg/en

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Identificação de Igrejas[edit]

Notei que tens muito conhecimento a respeito de Igrejas. Podes identificar estas para serem colocadas nas categorias corretas?

Desde já, grato.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 20:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the underlying photography from? --Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Padronizando[edit]

Veja se assim esta bom Category:Paróquia Imaculada Conceição, Igrejinha, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Outra coisa, notei que em Porto Alegre tem a diocese na categoria Igrejas católicas, como não tenho este tipo de conhecimento poderias colocar nesta. E se tiveres tempo, da uma olhada nesta para colocar as respectivas dioceses:Category:Catholic churches in Rio Grande do Sul --Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 12:39, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miura[edit]

Thank you so much! I will try to figure out which Miura is which model, super work! mr.choppers (talk)-en- 20:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is the cloud-photo originally your work or did you take it from somewhere else? --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, who is the illustrator of the drawings on the cover? --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paz e bem!
O livro não informa o nome do ilustrador.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS ([[User talk:Eugenio Hansen, OFS|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

O.k., then I recommend that you contact the editor. As the book is said to be from 2010, this information should be available, even in case that the cover-drawing is already very old. --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 太刻薄 ([[User talk:太刻薄|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adicionar nome do fotografo automaticamente[edit]

De uma olhada nesta categoria Category:Photographs by Paulo RS Menezes. Depois que coloquei estes parâmetros, o meu nome aparece nas categorias ocultas automaticamente. Veja esta foto File:Mapa Entrada.jpg.--Paulo RS Menezes ([[User talk:Paulo rsmenezes|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Jonund ([[User talk:Jonund|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Jonund ([[User talk:Jonund|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something went wrong when I tried to nominate the category for discussion. Anyway, the problem with the category is that the name is too long. In Cat-a-lot, many images are concealed because because the long category name makes Cat-a-lot cover the whole screen horizontally. --Jonund ([[User talk:Jonund|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Martin H. ([[User talk:Martin H.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arquidiocese[edit]

Da uma olhada nesta igreja Category:Paróquia São José, Palmares do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Se puderes, coloca a diocese a que pertence. desde ja grato. Aproveita e olha as outras fotos para verificar se são igrejas católica.--Paulo RS Menezes ([[User talk:Paulo rsmenezes|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:38, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 84.61.136.79 19:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 84.61.136.79 17:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Triggerhippie4 ([[User talk:Triggerhippie4|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:40, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Marcus Cyron ([[User talk:Marcus Cyron|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Jordon Kalilich ([[User talk:Jordon Kalilich|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 21:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 22:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 21:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 91.65.52.145 11:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 19:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Denniss ([[User talk:Denniss|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]