User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive32

Australian Speleological Federation logos[edit]

Dear User:EugeneZelenko The ASF-CDG Logo. the logo is authorised by the executive of the Australian Speleological Federation (ASF). The ASF-CDG wiki page clearly states that the ASF-CDG is a Special Interest Group of the ASF and the logo is derrivative of the ASF logo. Plkease see parent logo https://www.caves.org.au/ There is no copyright violation. Please replace the logo on the draft page. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 27.253.107.250 (talk) 23:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LakeDissappearing.jpg The jpg image was captured by my self in 2006 a Cave Diving trip to Koonalda Cave. All pictures were shared by or team and used freely in speleological publications. it was fist published on the front cover of the SUSS Bull 46(1) April-June 2006 which can be downloaded in full from the Sydney university Speological Society dropbox on the address;

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8gpylka5iffn0av/AADuidgPYaETFIIzL2CJo902a/BULLS/Vol_41-50?dl=0&preview=46-1.jpg&subfolder_nav_tracking=1.
How Suitcase and Passport cam upon this photo I do not know but I get no credit on their publication for the photo. There were several LakeDissappering photos taken at the time with a waterproof Coolpix camera.  I scaled on down for the web page. The exif data for one of the LakeDissappearing photos is not that interesting however here it is

EXIF tags in 'LakeDissappearing4.jpg' ('Motorola' byte order):

+----------------------------------------------------------

Tag |Value

+----------------------------------------------------------

+----------------------------------------------------------

Please ask photographers/copyrights holders to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

photo uploaded by Htawmonzel[edit]

Dear User:EugeneZelenko

Mon Po Sein was a politicien in Burma/Myanmar. All of his photo and documents are kept by his daughter. With her permission I took pictures of the old photos and documents for Wikipedia. His daughter is an old women now. I afraid that if you delete the files from Wikimedia Commons this historical documents will be lost forever.

Htawmonzel (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, owning physical copies doesn't mean owning copyrights. Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Myanmar to see are these document in public domain or exempted from copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have to delete all of my work because of a non-existent copyright issue[edit]

I design Wikipedia webpages for musicians. None of them are rich but their bands are well known. All of the photos given to me have been deleted and their pages still don't have any art or photos of them even though they are important enough to warrant such. Your ridiculous request for a copyright verification about artists in the PUNK ROCK musical world has caused me much grief as they don't have copyright issues, the artists themselves have given me full permission to add photos they themselves have given to me digitally yet you removed every single one of them. It took me a long time and a lot of work to get those done and now there's nothing but a stupid blank space on every artists page so good luck for any fans who want to see who the artists are or what their band logos are. RIDICULOUS. Go visit every single page where you deleted a commons photo and tell me if there are any on ANY of the pages. My work was a labor of love. Shame on you for oppressing not only the artists but me as well. Earl E. Smith (talk) 05:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask photographers/copyrights holders to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review and files undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nonequilibrium.gif[edit]

Hello, this file has been File:Nonequilibrium.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion with the claim that "Source of derivative work is not properly indicated". I hereby declare that I created the file by myself using powerpoint. Please contact me if you need further information Mimigdal (talk) 17:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken different problems. File:Nonequilibrium.gif is unused and w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics is better format for such files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear EugeneZelenko, Thank you for the explanation! The file File:Nonequilibrium.gif can be erased, and we directly uploaded our reply to the Referees on the sandbox associated with User:Mimigdal (talk) 12:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete File:Megaigra-1.jpg[edit]

For some reason this file has been deleted. Can it be restored or will I need to re-upload it under another name?--Вилорп (talk) 10:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, answer is no unless explicit permission from artist/copyrights holder would be given. See Commons:Licensing. However you could upload such files to projects that allow non-free media, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by Sdname9[edit]

I am a reporter, so I put the picture on different newspapers with different resolution. That's why you found it on google image.Sdname9 (Thảo luận) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdname9 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. Alternatively you ould send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gift Sipho

Uploads by Gift Sipho[edit]

i just need help with my uploads isn't it no one has a right to delete your uploa. How come mine are always deleted. if i make mistakes then help me i'm a begginner.😔😓 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gift Sipho (talk • contribs) 20:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For screenshot see Commons:Screenshots. Photo is claimed to be found with Google. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by Mitor1972[edit]

Hi Good morning.

thank you for your reply. i am kind of confuse, the "escudo" doesn´t beliong to anybody, it is like the spanish flag, or USA Flags..! i don´t understand what i have to do? Could you please help me with this?

I´ve been banned because pictures , yesterday i´ve sent all the original pictures, plus the authoritation for public use, i´ve explained that the images that you could see on internet are mines, so hopefully all my pictures will be backl again.

But, believe me that for me it is very difficoult to understand what i have to do to use the "Escudo" or a country Flag.

thank you for your reply.

Miguel T — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitor1972 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Usually official symbols are exempted from copyrights. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant countries. Some symbols may be {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A question[edit]

Hello, how can I officially candidate other pictures for deletion? Here are 2 candidates: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ladislav_Kralj_Me%C4%91imurec_-_autoportret_(~1960).JPG and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%BDeljko_Kipke;_Veduta_iz_1970.jpg Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 23:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could use Help:QuickDelete gadget to nominate single file and Help:VisualFileChange.js for multiple files.

Good description of problem would be something like Commons:Derivative works from painting by X (years of life).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Narrosse[edit]

Bonjour, Pourquoi voulez-vous supprimer cette photo ? C'est pourtant la plus représentative de ma commune. Cordialement Northrider640 (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Please read Commons:Liberté de panorama. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Le rond-point appartient à la commune. De fait, la sculpture qui y est de façon permanente appartient aussi à la commune, ça relève donc du domaine public. Northrider640 (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read Commons:Liberté de panorama? Copyrights belong to sculptor. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour votre intervention gravé à laquelle il n'y a plus de photo représentative de MA commune sur Google News (entre autres)!! ☠️ Northrider640 (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour votre intervention grâce à laquelle il n'y a plus de photo représentative de MA commune sur Google News (entre autres)!! ☠️ Northrider640 (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could try to lobby changes in French copyrights law. For example, freedom of panorama were introduced in Russian and Armenian laws recently. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Virginio Monticelli Maggiore Generale[edit]

--Lugavoi (talk) 10:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Dear Eugene the pictures that i add in this page are my pictures the image of Virginio Monticelli (my parent) is in my house. the other documents are already in my posses and of my property. how i can put a licence ? thanks for reply Franecsco Spinelli[reply]

Owning physical copy doesn't mean owning copyrights. Please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country to see if works are in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Przesłane przez Jurwas[edit]

Witam, w takim razie żeby zamieszczone zdjęcia miały poprawne treści, to co mam poprawić?

Pozdrawiam, Jurwas — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.153.237.186 (talk) 12:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Polish enough to write on it :-( Could you please be more specific about file in question or just login and sign? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день! сейчас подписано правильно? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jurek.was (talk • contribs) 15:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Alexandre M. B. Berwanger[edit]

Dear editor.

All the photos were taken by me and are available for public access, especially for me that I am a member of Fluminense Football Club, what would be the reason for impoverishing Wikipedia archive?

Att., Alexandre M. B. Berwanger (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works. You are not creator of trophies, posters and historical photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tungkol sa Duenas Iloilo[edit]

Ako nagupload ng Duenas iloilo na maliit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen Cocjin (talk • contribs) 08:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country to see if municipal coats or arms are in public domain. You could upload photo in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
	Ginawa ko Duenas,Iloilo picture. Stephen Cocjin (talk) 08:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2019112010002761[edit]

Hiǃ Update on the issue Ticket:2019112010002761

--Taras-fedora-syn (talk) 18:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have OTRS access. Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Also documents were issued by state, so copyrights don't belong to documents owner. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monique Navarro.jpg[edit]

Hi Eugene, the photos I uploaded, both, Monique Navarro.jpg and Monique Navarro 2.jpg, has been shoot by myself, with my own camera, I have the original file, but is very large in mb, so I did an edition to the original one, and just cropped it and lowed de size in mb. Let me know if you need the original one to confirm this. Best Regards, Chris. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristianKST (talk • contribs) 22:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It'll be reasonable to send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates), because photos looks like advertisement/promo. Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chukinder.jpg[edit]

You deleted the file, that was used in Udmurt Wikipedia, as Copyvio. Well, it isn't. Uploader stands next to me at a moment and confirms it. That organization, where Lukretsia is board member, has all the rights to the logo and they want it to be published under free license. Please restore. Thanks! Kruusamägi (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Organization official/lawyer should send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already asked the person to send the letter before I wrote to you and by now that is in OTRS. So please restore the image. There is no reason for delayng it further. Kruusamägi (talk) 06:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have OTRS access. As I wrote already, please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do have OTRS access and as I mentioned, it is ok. That is why I'm asking the restoration of that file. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! As I now have access to the file and its info, I've gotten one additional question to the uploader. So I'll sort that out first before adding the OTRS confirmation. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:జగ్గన్నతోట ప్రభల తీర్థం పై ప్రధాని మోదీ[edit]

నా ఫోన్ లో తీసిన చిత్రం. కేవలం వికీపీడియా కీ మాత్రమే అనుమతి ఇస్తున్న. Ch Maheswara Raju (talk) 15:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Indian languages :-( Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zelenko.[edit]

I would like to request you do not vandalize my articles or I will report you for harassment! Thank you! Mantr33r (talk) 15:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Licensing carefully before making new uploads, just to avoid baseless accusations. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you should read it because it doesn't say that video game photos are out of the public domain. Game developers do not own photos of their games. Thank you! Please keep civilized on Wikipedia. Thanks!!! Mantr33r (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Screenshots and Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of these and again, reproductions of video games are always legal. Video games are consumed by the user directly playing them. Something that isn't free to view, like a movie, cannot have non-licensed photos linked. These were also my own work: I produced those photos myself! It is legal to produce photos of a game. Thank you, once more. I'm looking forward to more civilized debate on this issue!!!! Mantr33r (talk) 16:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, use of these screenshots, that I and only I have produced myself, are under Fair Use in America, where the games I have screenshot were made and from which a "license" would be produced!!! Again, thank you. Fair use wins again Mantr33r (talk)

Fair use files are not allowed on Commons, see Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photos nominated for deletion[edit]

I noticed that my photos are nominated for deletion. Those are my legit photos taken from my old camera and cellphone. I worked hard for it. Please reconsider. Thank you. -mcLovin'tosh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovin'tosh (talk • contribs) 18:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will definitely re-upload them with EXIF to prove those are mine as soon as possible. You cant find the photos in the internet. But please do know those are the original resolution of my photos. That is how i captured them. Thank you for the advice. Mclovin'tosh (talk) 09:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt so because of resolutions inconsistency. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edited majority of my photos through random editing apps online and in some in my downloaded apps in my cellphone (filters, collage, etc). Did that affect the resolution? Thanks. Mclovin'tosh (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I suggested you already: you could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Noted sir. Will do. Thank you. Mclovin'tosh (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

all pictures is taken by myself on my own phone. why he writes that these pictures have problem with copyright? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Дилшодбек Аскаров (talk • contribs) 13:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See answer on similar question in this section above. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Habesha traditional historical music[edit]

Hi, this file was created by me in 1965 as an amateur director in Ethiopia and is now in the public domain because 54 years have passed as it is established by Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ethiopia, the video is a show that recalls the lyrics and the music of the Ethiopian and Eritrean historical tradition created during the period of the Ethiopian Empire and Medri bahri, are historical songs of battle, love, friendship and unity among all the peoples that make up the Horn of Africa, as a source there is book "Secular verse and poetry in Ethiopian traditional music" by Professor Ashenafi Kebede who was one of the greatest Ethiopian composer, conductor, ethnomusicologist, historical musicologist, music educator, novelist, and Ethiopian poet. Sorry, i fix the date and add three other authors Timkehet Teffera "Ethiopian Popular Music History Chapter I - Part I-2-3", Kay Kaufman Shelemay is the G. Gordon Watts Professor of Music and Professor of African and African American Studies at Harvard University the books are: "Musical Scholarship and Ethiopian Studies: Past, Present, Future", "Ethiopian Christian Chant: An Anthology with Peter Jeffery (3 vols., 1993–97)", "Music, Ritual, and Falasha History A Song of Longing: An Ethiopian Journey (1991)" and Simeneh Betreyohannes "Scholarship on Ethiopian Music: Past Present and Future Prospects"--Bilissuummaa Duguma Jabarraa (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Что надо сделать, чтобы информация не была удалена?[edit]

Что надо сделать, чтобы информация не была удалена? Я являюсь наследником авторских прав Эли Шехтмана. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.65.6.142 (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вы не могли бы указать на проблемные файлы или же войти в систему и оставить подпись? Вы являетесь единственным наследником? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photos I uploaded[edit]

Hi - This is Bill Henderson, wfhenderson. These are my own photos. Please! I welcome guidance on how to license or tag them the correct way so they're not taken down. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wfhenderson (talk • contribs) 17:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon of France passes the town of Vacha[edit]

Thank you for your remarks on

The date of the source has been added. As well as the archive signature. --Jürgen Nemitz (HSP) (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, the text ist from 1813, so it is public domain.--Jürgen Nemitz (HSP) (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of the digized version is granted by Hessian state archive via Mail.--Jürgen Nemitz (HSP) (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is was my point. Documents are in public domain, so relevant license tag should be used. It's hard to tell could archive add copyrights over its images images or not. See w:en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you very much. Of course the record itself is public domain in any sense as ist it is over 200 years old. But the picture taken from the record might generate photographic rights as long as it isn't a purely machinedriven process like eg. a bookscanner. As you can't tell whether a human being was in charge taking the picture or not, we thought that cc ought to be a more appropriate license model than PD.--137.248.1.6 16:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for posting via IP. It was me!--Jürgen Nemitz (HSP) (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably both licenses should be used: for document and digitization. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per confirmation by a representative of the archive under ticket:2020020510002429, the media files in question are in public domain and have been retagged as such. Regards, Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 15:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have OTRS access. Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was only informing you as the OTRS agent that handled this ticket. Regards, Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 19:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Licenza Commons[edit]

Ciao! :-) Ho visto i tuoi messaggi. Devo dire che non capisco. I file che carico sono sempre opera mia ed è questa la licenza che uso. Ti prego, fammi sapere che cosa sbaglio. Mimidellaboheme (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( w:it:Scalable Vector Graphics is best format for diagrams. You should you use proper license domain tags for historical images. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consent[edit]

Wolny-Hamkało, Miłka Malzahn will send consent to the address permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org.

Coats of arms, drawings made before 1939 (Germany). Pictures from Prager Presse (Czechoslovakia 1925). Historical photos from the family archive (magen), Poland (II Republic Polish ) before 1939. I added sources and countries of origin.

Wolny-Hamkało, Miłka Malzahn отправит согласие на адрес permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org.

Герб, чертежи, сделанные до 1939 года (Германия). Фотографии с Prager Presse (Чехословакия, 1925). Исторические фотографии из семейного архива (magen), Польша (II Pеспубликанская польская) до 1939 года. Я добавил источники и страны происхождения. Magen (talk) 18:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permissions are irrelevant if works are in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant countries for proper license tags. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, я улучшил информацию о файле. Если есть какие-либо другие комментарии, пожалуйста, отдельно для каждого файла.

Hello, I have improved the file information. If there are any other comments, please, separately for each file.Magen (talk) 21:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Основная проблема - некорректная лицензия (w:pl:Creative Commons создана в этом веке). Для гербов желательно установить и добавить в описание дату оригинальной публикации на бумаге и дату, когда герб был выдан роду. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Большинство авторов неизвестны. Почти все работы были созданы 70 лет назад. Magen (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

В законах об авторском праве есть специальный пункт об анонимных работах. Смотрите Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland. Корректная лицензия для работ неизвестных авторов, созданных более 70 лет назад - {{PD-anon-70-EU}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за информацию, но я не знаю много об этих лицензиях. Вы можете помочь мне и показать или добавить лицензии на файлы. спасибо Magen (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Основной источник знаний о лицензии - закон страны об авторском праве. Краткие выдержки доступны в Commons:Copyright rules by territory. Чтобы исправить лицензию в Вашем случае, надо в каждом файле отредактировать текст и заменить {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} на {{PD-anon-70-EU}}. Плюс добавить информацию по датам, как я советовал выше. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję[edit]

Pozdrawiam Magen (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nie ma za co :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Доброе утро[edit]

Доброе утро, пометки файлов были исправлены. Можете ли вы удалить информацию

об их удалении? привет Magen (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано для гербов и карт. Остались фотографии и картина (смотрите запрос на удаление). Так как некоторые фотографии взяты из статьи с указанием авторства, надо попробовать поискать дату его смерти. Для картины - художника. Оставшиеся фотографии могут относится к Чехии или Словакии, поэтому надо прочитать особенности тамошних законов об авторском праве. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Что не так с моими файлами?[edit]

Приветствую! Вы принимали участие в удалении моих файлов. Если можно, объясните в двух словах, что не так по картам? Они мои, лицензию на полные указал. И что по фото стенда? С ним то что не так? --Finbin (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вы - профессиональный топограф? Старые карты могут находится в общественном достоянии, но надо исправить лицензии. Смотрите Commons:Copyright rules by territory для страны происхождения. Для понимания проблемы со стендом прочитайте w:ru:Свобода панорамы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вроде того (карты с нуля нарисовал лично я, никто не верит, есть исходники в PSD)
Съёмка местности проведена Вами? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Если можно, подскажите какую, чтоб не было проблем в дальнейшем. Я уже так смотрел. Им 150 лет, какие права?
Страна происхождения? Как минимум право автора на имя. Смотрите w:ru:Общественное достояние. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Некорректная ссылка. Он же стенд, он для публики, по умолчанию.
Скульптуры и здания тоже для публики, но тем не менее, на них распространяются те же ограничения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Finbin (talk) 15:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Умно, да больно непонятно.

1.) Ну допустим, поверх карт грунтов рисовал 1:10000, предоставленных местной властью,что имела на то полное право.

Карты вполне могут являться объектом авторского права. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2.) Только за. Как это указать, ежели не очевидно.

Ещё раз: смотрите Commons:Copyright rules by territory для страны происхождения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3.) Что указать?

Нужно разрешение автора стенда. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Я же и хочу, чтоб как надо было. Это ж не первый раз. По другому обозначал, перезагружал, всё не подходит. Где писать это, в описании файла тегами? Какими? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finbin (talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1.) Никак нет. Они оплачены местным бюджетом и являются собственностью общины, неопределённой группы людей. В плане топосъёмки.

По остальному - спасибо. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finbin (talk • contribs) 16:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Это зависит от страны. Насколько знаю, в законодательстве об авторском праве стран бывшего СССР таких норм нет. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

А данные OpenStreetMap, тоже под авторскими правами, в случае использования метаданных в качестве подложки? На Викимедиа ясно написано, что карты собственной работы, один из рекомендованных видов изображений. Они должны быть неточными, дабы не стоял вопрос о съёмке? Да и как знать, вдруг я квадрокоптером местность отснял, там 20 на 30 км, нескольких съёмок с 2000 метров, с головой хватило бы. Выходит файлы удалены безо всяких на то оснований, из-за невнятных подозрений непонятно в чём, не так ли? Даже с чисто юридической точки зрения.--Finbin (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Участники OpenStreetMap явно разрешают использовать результаты своей работы на условиях лицензии {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} (смотрите https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright). Производные работы создаются на основе этой же лицензии, но нельзя выдавать их за свою работу. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Проще говоря, выдаёте себя за юриста - соблюдайте презумцию невиновности. Обоснуйте нарушение, восстановите как было (по моим картам) или я добьюсь бана Вашего аккаунта. Ваши намерения невозможно расценивать как добрые, пусть все об этом знают. Будь у нас реальный суд в тех же США, я бы отсудил у Вас всё до нитки - авторские права не единственные. Википедию превратили в источник ЧСВ - для таких как Вы, что её не улучшают, а только гадят другим, нормальным пользователям. Может я ошибаюсь - объясните - я извинюсь. --Finbin (talk) 09:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с основами законодательства об авторском праве и прочитайте закон страны, где Вы живёте, перед тем, как писать подобные строки. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Карты мои, посторонних работ не содержат. Лицензия указана. Примеры в обсуждении для понимания того, что любые подозрения голословны и не могут считаться очевидными. Что я у кого скопировал и что выдал за свою работу? Ничего. Чьи конкретно авторские права я нарушил? Ничьи. Есть права, есть законы, где-то в чём то разные, но это нюансы не имеющие отношения к сути вопроса. Других карт этого участка, схожего уровня детализации - не существует. --Finbin (talk) 19:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вы сами написали выше, что карты являются производными работами, то есть, утверждение посторонних работ не содержат некорректно. Вопрос об условиях использования исходных карт не прояснён. Смотрите также Commons:Производные произведения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Мне неприятны конфликты. Ваш вклад в Википедия несомненно ценен. Мне просто очень досадно, что работы на которые я по доброй воле потратил около двух месяцев регулярно подвергаются безосновательным подозрениям (не только Вашим). Надеюсь мне будут полезны Ваши рекомендации следующему собеседнику (Северо-западный университет). --Finbin (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Northwest University Images[edit]

Hello there,

I am an intern working for Northwest University at the moment and they would like to have their updated brand images on the Wikipedia page. How would I properly put the images on the page without them getting deleted? They do not know which is the correct copyright to fill out when adding their brand images to Wikimedia. Is there a simple way to fix it?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Admiral Raven (talk • contribs) 22:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could try to get official permission to use university logo under term of one of licenses compatible with Commons:Licensing. Alternatively you could upload logo on projects that allow non-free media, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Файл File:Tumar.jpg был заподозрен в нарушении авторских прав.[edit]

Добрый день,

Наша организация занимается организацией данной премии. Фото которое было сделано иноформ агентством можно удалить.

также как убрать сообщение Значимость предмета статьи поставлена под сомнение? В статье приведены ссылки на само министерство, то есть в данном случае это и есть авторитетный источник. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vali81 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Попросите, пожалуйста, директора или юриста организации послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Помощь с проверкой разрешения Вы можете получить на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis karpouzos media nominated for deletion , instructions for copyright attribute change[edit]

With all respect Mr. Zelenko , i declare that i'm the author creator of such photos with my digital camera shot and hereby distribute all the copyrights free to anyone for the media uploaded , if is there any mistake that i've made , please instruct me how to change it , photos and videos, audio are and should be free to anyone for downloading . i respect the rules and should abide them. Alexis Karpouzos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meditationlife (talk • contribs) 13:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. Please also read Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File tagging File:Stacja kolejowa w Białej Prudnickiej 07.jpg[edit]

Under these photos on bazakolejowa.pl it is written that you can use them on other websites if you mention the source and the author ("Licencja: Można wykorzystać poza serwisem 'bazakolejowa.pl' z podaniem źródła i autora"). You don't have to ask for a permission from the author. The website mentions when you need to get the permission, here for example: "Można wykorzystać poza serwisem bazakolejowa.pl po każdorazowym uzyskaniu zgody autora" - "You can use this outside of bazakolejowa.pl after receiving a permission from the author". --ElCet (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Term wykorzystać is ambiguous. By default copyrights law (at least in ex-USSR countries) allow to quote. Best solution would be to ask site or particular uploader there to use Creative Commons Attribution license explicitly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for not deleting my photos.[edit]

Thank you for not deleting my photos.

Hello, I hope I have done this right.

I seen that someone tried to delete all of my photos on Wikimedia. I am glad you stepped in. I sign all of my photos off Microsoft paint after a dispute I had years ago and also so people can't say they are their photos. EXIF etc I haven't a clue what that means however.

Dynamite16 Dynamite16 (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dynamite16. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CONTESTAZIONE RICHIESTA DI CANCELLAZIONE[edit]

Buongiorno, ricevo una comunicazione di richiesta di cancellazione di una modifica che ho fatto, inserendo lo stemma della mia famiglia nell'armatoriale delle famiglie italiane; la richiesta mi proviene dall'utente EugeneZelenko che sembra porre un problema di copyright che non ho ben compreso, anche perché scrivo impropriamente in inglese (la pagina modificata è in italiano ed io sono italiano; chiedo spiegazioni e se devo fare qualcosa per impedire che si proceda alla cancellazione di un mio contributo, peraltro che mi riguarda direttamente — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdetilla (talk • contribs) 11:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( Coat of arm may be in public domain because of age. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of own recording of state anthem[edit]

Hey! I saw you tagged my upload for deletion. It is my own cover of a state anthem which to my knowledge has no copyright. I'm not sure what I need to do to prove that it isn't in violation of copyright. Could you please help me out? Sai2207 (talk)

Such recording could not be entirely your work. You could claim only performance copyrights. So proper license tag for music itself should present on file description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell me exactly what I need to do? The recording of the music is entirely my work, but the composition is not. It was submitted into a competition 57 years ago to become state anthem and is now in the state archives. I don't know what that means as far as copyright goes, but I can't find anything saying it is copyrighted Sai2207 (talk)

Could you please clarify, is it state anthem or only one of candidates to such status? Usually copyrights law exempt only state symbols. If this is state anthem, you need to find relevant exempt/public domain license tag in Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. If this is one of submissions it may be in public domain by age. Again, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The work is the state anthem. I found this on the link you provide. "Copyright in works of the Government, Government organizations and international bodies subsists for 50 years from the year in which the work was first published". The song was published in or before 1963 as it was aired on radio every day before 16 September 1963. So the copyright expired 7 years ago? What should I do now? Sai2207 (talk)

You need to update license section and use proper tag there for music. As I wrote above, you could claim only performance copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bills[edit]

Bills has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

deletion requests[edit]

hey, I think your assumption that these photos weren't the users own work was wrong. I would like you to reconsider.--Sparrow (麻雀) (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Дилшодбек Аскаров. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Works published in the U.S. before 1978 that have no copyright notice[edit]

Regarding images I have uploaded that will be removed from Wikipedia because of potential copyright issues: These images are in the public domain because they were published before 1978 but do not bear a copyright notice. Nor were they registered for copyright in the U.S. The images derive from sheet music covers. The music was copyrighted, but that copyright did not include any images. That places them into the Public Domain. I see no category under copyright status where this may be noted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elenkrig (talk • contribs) 18:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please always make sure that files you uploaded have proper license tag and relevant source information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted images[edit]

Hi, Eugene. Why did you remove images that I've insered from Commons? I believe that's files can stay in Wikimedia Commons (also becouse I've explanated who have uploaded files first time in Internet). Sfoltito (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Screenshots carefully before making new uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted images > Copyright[edit]

It is not my work, I have indicated the first official authors who uploaded the file for the first time on the Internet and explained all the most relevant details regarding the upload of the files in question. ~Sfoltito (talk) 19:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read Commons rules I mentioned above? You could upload non-free media to projects that allow them, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Picture deletion[edit]

Hello Eugene!

You have identified five pictures on wikipedia.hu for deletion. I am not an experienced user, could you please help me how could I prove to you that these are pictures taken by me? These represents my father, mother and my grandfather. I do have all original pictures. Please do not mark for deletion, but help me how to contact you for clarification.

Affected:

File:Árkossy Ilona.jpg And also:

File:Istvan Arkossy.jpg File:Dr. Árkossy Sándor - Ex Libris.jpg File:Dr. Árkossy Sándor.jpg File:Árkossy István - fotó.jpg

Best regards, Zsolt Arkossy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkossy (talk • contribs) 21:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who made photos? If photographer(s) is not known, what are approximate dates of creation? Who made artwork for File:Dr. Árkossy Sándor - Ex Libris.jpg? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте. Прошу удалить несвободные файлы с викисклада.[edit]

Здравствуйте. Я увидел что вы админ викисклада, поэтому решил написать вам это письмо. Я перенес фото на ру вики, так как фото несвободные. (У нас нет свободы панорамы в Казахстане) Теперь их нужно удалить с викисклада. Я оставил только старые фото, которые перешли в общественное достояние. Нужно удалить все фото кроме тех что ниже:

Список этих фото удалять не нужно. А все что не попало в список нужно удалить.

Можете пожалуйста удалить. --User 0100 (talk) 06:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Очень извиняюсь, но сегодня времени в обрез. Напомните, пожалуйста, завтра. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: Здравствуйте еще раз. Я уже заметил что вы начали удалять. Можете пожалуйста восстановить то что удалили. Прошу прощения. Оказывается их надо номинировать на удаление а потом уже удалять после обсуждения. --User 0100 (talk) 16:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Я удалил только очевидные случаи современных произведений: статуи, фотографию, разрисовку кинотеатра. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @EugeneZelenko: Ааа понятно. Остальные оставшиеся я недавно номинировал на удаление. Спасибо за помощь --User 0100 (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Pink Tour poster[edit]

I'm trying to upload the poster for the Draft:Hot Pink Tour, how can I do it? It always gets deleted. If you could do it or explain how to I'd appreciate it. Artursilva0220 (talk) 15:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload such files to projects that allow non-free media, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ещё не разобрались)))[edit]

Не уверены, что надо писать реакцию на сообщение сюда, но реально не хватает времени очень глубоко вникать в систему портала - нахожусь на работе. Но, может, здесь тоже буден виден наш ответ.

Добрый день, уважаемый Евгений! Зашли на ВИКИМЕДИА, увидев сообщение о фолк-конкурсе. Спасибо за ваше внимание и общую активность. Сразу скажем, что все фотографии гарантированно наши - здесь все члены нашей семьи - дочки с их дочками. Среагировали на конкурс, потому что нам очень близок фольклор, причем не только в его концертном выражении, это видно по фото - наши дети любят народные костюмы, они им очень идут, их русские лица хорошо сочетаются с платками и сарафанами. Дело в том, что девушки были солистками фольклорного ансамбля "Росинка" МИД России, и с тех пор мы с народными песнями не расстаёмся, часто собираемся творческим коллективом ( хотя все уже стали взрослыми, имеют свои семьи). Завтра будем отмечать Масленицу, соберемся с баяном, будем жечь чучело. Если вы в Москве - приходите в гости. Насчет фото - просто вспомнили о некоторых ярких фотографиях в народных костюмах, нашли их и просто поделились приятными воспоминаниями. Показали, как хорошо сочетаются платки и сарафаны с природой и строениями. Никаких претензий, если фото удалят - главное, что мы получили удовольствие от них. Да и вы посмотрели на наших красивых девочек. Всего вам наилучшего! Семья Струниных

Для того, чтобы подтвердить авторство, Вы можете загрузить фотографии в оригинальном разрешении с EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edenderry Coat of Arms.png[edit]

@EugeneZelenko: File:Edenderry Coat of Arms.png is my own creation, made using freely available assets provided by Wikimedia commons itself. I placed it under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, there shouldn't need to be more to it than that.
It's official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ireland. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hello. Since you frequently check on COM:BRFA, I hope that you can clear my doubts on some stuff. I recently created an alt account to separate the high(er) speed editing from my main account. The task I'd mainly be doing is using cat-a-lot to categorise the uncategorised files (see Special:Contributions/Xaronim). After just editing a single page (120 edits), I've been throttled and unable to perform any more edits. The main question is, should I request to operate Xaronim as a bot account or ask at BN for a crat to give that account "account creator" rights? Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's reasonable to ask for bot status if you plan to perform edits in such rate. It's good idea to consider to use scripts for such purposes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I'd go for scripts but using cat-a-lot is much more efficient IMO. Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I remember template.py could perform same task. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for advice[edit]

Hi, you deleted the .png file of Киев днем и ночью. I read the licencing guideline and grasp some norms. I want to upload poster in .jpg file. I need to know the all licencing terms and I want to upload television show. The Supermind (talk) 10:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely movie posters are copyrighted, unless explicit permission is given. You could upload non-free media to projects that allow it, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So are you saying movie posters do not uploaded in Wikimedia commons? But it is television series. Most articles have been uploaded by Wikimedia commons. Why? The Supermind (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. Same goes to album covers, magazine covers, newspapers, etc. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Pavel Troshkin[edit]

Здравствуйте, уважаемый коллега. Прошу вас ознакомиться с аргументацией оппонентов в этом запросе на удаление. Я даже не прошу вас подводить итог, я просто хотел бы понять, чья аргументация более основана на правилах Сommons. Возможно, вы сможете посоветовать мне подготовить дополнительные аргументы. Насколько я знаю, обычно в Википедии доверяют бумажным источникам и не требуют обязательного предоставления онлайн-версии, к тому же опубликованной достаточно давно, чтобы быть в общественном достоянии. Однако именно этого постоянно требует номинатор в своей массовой войне с советскими фотографиями. На этом надуманном основании она уже вынесла на удаление более тысячи файлов. Заранее спасибо за рассмотрение. --VLu (talk) 10:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@VLu: Canvasing? Slandering me (without making any argument based on actual official Commons policy or copyright law)?! Not good.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

А библиотеки РФ до оцифровки газет пока не добрались? Знаю, что РГБ активно оцифровывала книги лет 6-7 назад. Лучший аргумент в этой дискуссии - ссылки на опубликованные снимки. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you delited a picture that i created[edit]

before a few days you delited tow pictures that i made my salf! "File:לוגו להקת "הסחת דעת".png" and "File:עטיפת החוברת "סודו של (הליגיון) הסקרטוני" המלאה.pdf"

Please read Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Членський квиток НСПУ Тетяни Череп.jpg[edit]

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko

Я загрузил фотографию членского билета File:Членський квиток НСПУ Тетяни Череп.jpg. Эта фотография билета в свю очередь содержит фрагмент другой фотографии, ранее загруженной на Commons: File:Cherep Tania.JPG.

Вы поставили шаблон {{Dw no source since}} с комментарием This is a derivative work and no source or permission of the original work is provided.

Я поставил шаблон {{Extracted from|1=File:Cherep Tania.JPG}} и убрал поставленный Вами шаблон.

В связи с эти два вопроса:

Правильный ли шаблон я поставил? Нет ли более подходящего, который бы говорил не о том что весь файл является derivative work (производной работой), а о том что лишь фрагмент файла является производной работой?
Вправе ли я самостоятельно убирать поставленный Вами шаблон? --Perohanych (talk) 11:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

В данном случает всё правильно. Остальная часть изображения содержит только текст без творческой составляющей. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Video from Chad (Wiki Loves Africa 2020)[edit]

Hello,

May I ask what is wrong with this file : File:WIKI LOVES AFRICA Tchad.webm ?

The uploader made the video and said so, what else should he have done to be OK ?

Regards,

Ji-Elle (talk) 11:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Music is used in video. Its source/license should be explicitly indicated or it could be removed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answer. It should be explained explicitly to the uploaders. In my opinion this automatic message is not understandable by newcomers. Ji-Elle (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think Commons rules should be explained in competition pages, because such competitions attract many newcomers, who don't know too much about all details of copyrights laws. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

how create a new category[edit]

I want to create new categories named Samaveda/Uhaganam, Samaveda/Gramageya, Samaveda/Aranyageya, Samaveda/Uhyaganam. I do not know how to create these. Puranastudy (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC) puranastudy[reply]

Why do you need to create catagories with such names? Is it because same place has different transliterations from different languages? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko Hope u are well

The following pictures are taken by my friend before years as he was living in the native place and i requested him to send me the copies as i can use them in wikipedia. And i use them within wiki as no copyright may occur and pls review my contribution and stop the deletion request if may possible.

Affected:

File:IT Park at fintech valley.jpg And also:

File:Conduent at millineium it towers.jpg File:Fintechvalleyvizag.jpg File:Fintechvalleyvizag2.jpg

thanks Invisibelibrarian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invisibelibrarian (talk • contribs) 04:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask your friend to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Аб выдаленні файлаў з Category:Mikola Tarasikaŭ[edit]

Вітаю Вас, паважаны спадар Яўген.

Яшчэ ў 2019 нейкімі замежнікамі былі выдалены файлы з творамі мастака Міколы Тарасікава. На мой погляд, для выдалення не было аніякіх падстаў.

Калі ласка, паглядзіце мае перамовы.

Пазіцыя майго апанента нічога, акрамя абурэння, не выклікае. Яго разважанні аб тым, што Мікола Тарасікаў нарадзіўся пры Расійскай імперыі, а памёр у БССР, а таму ён рускі, - пазамежамі сэнсу. Такім чынам і маіх продкаў мажліва залічыць да рускіх, але гэтага ніколі не было і не будзе.

Я больш за паўстагоддзя ўважліва назіраю за развіццём беларускага выяўленчага мастацтва, мне вядомы творчы лёс і біяграфіі амаль што ўсіх беларускіх мастакоў ХХ стагодзя. Жыццё М. Тарасікава и яго шлях у мастацтве ведаю дасканала. Гэта сапраўдны беларускі мастак, які цалкам аддаў свой талент на карысць беларускага мастацтва, узбагаціў яго сваёй нястомнай творчай працай.

М. Тарасікаў аніякага дачынення да мастацтва Расіі не мае. Калі ласка, аднавіце файлы, беспадстаўна выдаленныя чужынцамі. --Bk1949 (talk) 20:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Калі ласка, пакінем эмоцыі і праектаваньне ўласных думак на мінулае ў старане. Трэба адказаць на пытаньні: ці ўсе творы зроблены ў БССР? Ці публікавалі іх пры жыцьці мастака на тэрыторыі іншых рэспублік СССР і краін? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. Усе творы Мікалая Тарасікава зроблены ў БССР. 2. Пры жыцці мастака, акрамя партрэта акадэміка Нікольскага, на тэрыторыі іншых рэспублік СССР і краін нічога не друкавалася.--Bk1949 (talk) 20:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ці не супярэчыць гэта інфармацыі ў артыкулу: гравюра «Малочніца», вучоба ў УССР? А ў вайну дзе ён быў і чым займаўся? Усе 50 выстаў праходзілі выключна ў БССР? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1-е. Гравюра «Малочніца» зроблена не мастаком, а 16 - гадовым падлеткам, які не меў мастацкай адукацыі. Меў пэўны талент, але станоўчых тэхнічных навыкаў не меў. Акрамя таго, няма ссылкі на нумар часопіса, дзе яна быццам бы была надрукавана, таму інфармацыя ў артыкуле не можа лічыцца дакладнай. 2-е. У 1930-я гады ў БССР нельга было атрымаць вышэйшую мастацкую адукацыю. Таму многія з беларускіх мастакоў вучыліся ў вышэйшых мастацкіх ўстановах паза межамі Беларусі. 3-е. Да вайны быў прызнаны “нестроевым”. У час вайны дабравольна пайшоў у Красную Армію. Ваяваў. Вярнуйся з вайны ў Мінск у салдацкім шынелі. 4-е. Працы М. Тарасікава пры яго жыцці ўдзельнічалі ў асноўным у мінскіх выстаўках. Некалькі разоў выстаўляліся ў РСФСР, Украіне і паза межамі СССР. Ад гэтага Тарасікаў не перастаў лічыцца беларускім мастаком. Яго імя не згадваецца ў расійскіх энцыклапедычных выданнях, няма таксама артыкула у РуВікі. Для расійскага мастацтвазнаўства – гэты мастак не існаваў. --Bk1949 (talk) 19:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Законы аб аўтарскім праве нічога не гавораць пра адукацыю. Дарэчы ён меў савецкае грамадзянства, а правапрыемніца СССР - РФ. Апошняе для мяне - "шэрая" вобласьць, трэба шукаць рашэньні судоў у падобных справах. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Тады патлумачце, калі ласка, чаму выдаленая менавіта частка файлаў, а іншыя файлы былі пакінутыя? У чым справа? Па якіх крытэрах былі абраныя файлы да выдалення? Ваш адказ дапаможа мне пазбегнуць памылак.--Bk1949 (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Пра гэта лепей спытаць у таго, хто намінаваў на выдаленьне. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination by you for deletion.[edit]

Dear EugeneZelenco,
I am a very inexperienced user of Wikipedia.
I understand that you nominated for deletion from Wikicommons file:2020-01-14 de Vito.gif .
This is the coat of arms of my family, de Vito, before it merged with the Piscicelli familiy to become de Vito Piscicelli, as it is now known. The right to use it has been confirmed to my grandfather, Giacomo de Vito Piscicelli, in 1911 by the King of Italy, then Vittorio Emanuele III di Savoia. Tha drawing I published on Wikikcommons is a variation commissioned by me. If you would like to receive a copy of the 1911 confirmation, or of the commission, please let me know how and where to send them by e-mail (I would prefer not to publish them on Wikicommons).
My Username has changed from Giacopis (when I loaded the image on Wikikcommons) to Floridasso .
Please remove the nomination for deletion, or let me know what I should demonstrate, or whom I should ask.
And please if it was not you to nominate for deletion, do let me know
Yours
--Floridasso (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's likely that coat of arms are in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy for proper license tags. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All this considered, it would be very kind of you if you could remove the Nomination for deletion tag

Yours

--Floridasso (talk) 23:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You still need to fix source information and license tags in files. You are not creator of coat of arms and you may be not only remaining member of family, so claims of own work are incorrect. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear EugeneZelenko,

I am afraid I shall never be able to do the drawing personally: but I stil need to load it into a Wikipedia voice. So i commissioned the work to be executed, and paid to buy the full rights on the image.

Could you suggest what exactly I should do to put that image on a Wikipedia voice?

Thank you very much for your attention

--Floridasso (talk) 14:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote, coat of arms image may be in public domain by age. When was design created? You wrote that it was confirmed in 1911, but it means that it existed before this date. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear EugeneZelenko,

the de Vito coat of arms dates some time back: certainly before 1684 and possibly long before, and was in use by my family under the Bourbon dinasty in Naples, and presumably under preceding dinasties. It was included in the coat of arms of the de Vito Piscicelli family, the name by which we are now known, after the marriage of Franceso de Vito with Giulia Piscicelli in 1684.

The image was of course meant to be shown and as widely dispayed as possible: I would infere that the copyright has since been extinguished.

In 1861 the Bourbon dinasty was removed from power and the Savoia dinasty became sovereign over Italy, and Naples in particular.

The Savoia dinasty gradually proceeded to confirm ("riconoscere") titles, coats of arms and other attributes, as yhey had been in use under preceding dnasties, to existing noble families.

In 1911 (rectius: 1912) the de Vito Piscicelli family, upon request of my Grandfather Giacomo de Vito Piscicelli, was "riconosciuta" with the right for male members and their successors, and unmarried female members, to use its title, "nobile", and its coat of arms. I may show you the decree if it is of any interest to you.

I am a successor of my Grandfather and therefore that "riconoscimento" was intended also for me.

Material production of the drawing in a form suitable for the Web has been commissioned by me, and the full rights on it have been bought by me.

I hope I have now given you the information you were seeking and ask you to let me know if there is anything else I should do to use the image in Wikipedia, or to be so kind as to remove the notification tag.

Yours sincerely

--Floridasso (talk) 15:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add this information to each file description, preferably with links to books (like coats of arms directory), and change license tag to {{PD-Art}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eugene Zelenco,

I have added the information: I hope I did it in the right place.

I am not very familiar with licence tags: what is{{PD-Art}} and where shall I put it?.

Tanks a lot

--Floridasso (talk) 09:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Visit each file page. Click edit. Current license tag is {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Also {{Information}} contain incorrect date/source/author fields. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eugene Zelenco,

I am so totally inexperienced.

I only recall one file page, file:2020-01-14 de Vito.gif; please let me know which other pages I should visit.

And also please, how should I form the "date/source/author" field? Would "date=14/01/2020" (the date in which the final version of the drawing was finished)/ "source=de Vito Piscicelli Family" / "author= Commissioned by Giacopis/Floridasso" do?

Please let me know

--Floridasso (talk) 16:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could see all your uploads on Special:ListFiles/Floridasso. Please dead beginning of this discussion to understand what is problem with current date/source/author fields. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of nomination for deletion.[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko, Please find my contribution on the discussion of nomination of this file . --Neverstopthat (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answered there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, Please take a look at my reply here.Is it all good now ?--Neverstopthat (talk) 09:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no point to keep JPEG. By the word, you could redraw logo in SVG completely. Current version contains too much artifacts from JPEG. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, I have redraw completely the logo in SVG. Please take a look here. Would this be good ? I have tried to upload it but it says that there are unsafe CSS in the style element of uploaded SVG file. Do you know how to fix this issue ? Thanks --Neverstopthat (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely better then original. It's weird that CSS is used at all. You could ask help on Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok . I have asked on Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop. Please take a look and thanks for your help.--Neverstopthat (talk) 15:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC) Hey , look at the reply from the lab : "it looks like the main problem is that there's an . Can you please help me on how to do that ? Here is the link to the file on jpg .--Neverstopthat (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Hi Eugene, I have solved the problem. Please take a look here. Thanks for the advice and for suggesting to make the logo on SVG. Best --Neverstopthat (talk) 12:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Obviously SVG should be self-contained and not include bitmap images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BORIS JOHNSON OLYMPIC SCULPTURE by FLAVIA BRILLI[edit]

Hello Eugene, I am the owner and designer of the sculpture of BORIS JOHNSON. This can be clarified on GOV UK registered designs. https://www.registered-design.service.gov.uk/find/4030000

kind regards, Flavia Brilli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epicurus65 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charleroi - plan de 1693 reproduit par Darville - 01.jpg[edit]

This file is freedom of panorama in Belgium. Restaure, please. --H₂O^(talk) 17:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not entirely own work. So it's reasonable to add related public domain tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Постер информационного агентства Репорт-Информ.png[edit]

Письмо permissions-commons@wikimedia.org отправлено.

Ticket#: 2020031610009114

СПС. С уважением, Petunpetun32 (talk) 21:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32[reply]

OTRS обработало, подтвердило лиц. чистоту.

Эта переписка была проверена добровольцами службы OTRS и помещена в архив разрешений. Доверенные участники, имеющие учётную запись в службе OTRS, могут получить доступ к переписке по номеру #2020031610009114
--Petunpetun32 (talk) 09:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32[reply]

У меня нет доступа к OTRS. Вы можете обратится за помощью на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard или напрямую к участникам с доступом. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пример новости из подписки «Служба информации».flac[edit]

Письмо на permissions-commons@wikimedia.org отправлено.
Ticket#: 2020031610009132
СПС. С уважением, Petunpetun32 (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32[reply]

OTRS обработало и подтвердило лиц. чмстоту

Эта переписка была проверена добровольцами службы OTRS и помещена в архив разрешений. Доверенные участники, имеющие учётную запись в службе OTRS, могут получить доступ к переписке по номеру #2020031610009132

СПС
--Petunpetun32 (talk) 09:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32[reply]

File:Свидетельство о регестрации СМИ Информационного агентства Репорт-Информ.jpg[edit]

Hi,
I am sorry but you wrote:
"Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (обсуждение) 14:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)"
What tag I must use or where I can look for the list of tags? I tried to search in wikimedia but didn't find :(
Thank you for assistance.
Petunpetun32 (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32[reply]

See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I found tags regarding to official STATE document:

	This work is not an object of copyright according to article 1259 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation No. 230-FZ of December 18, 2006. Shall not be objects of copyright: official documents of state government agencies and local government agencies of municipal formations, including laws, other legal texts, judicial decisions, other materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character, official documents of international organizations, as well as their official translations; state symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like), as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations; works of folk art (folklore), which don't have specific authors; news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character (daily news reports, television programs, transportation schedules, and the like).
	Comment – This license tag is also applicable to official documents, state symbols and signs of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (union level^[1]). Warning – This license tag is not applicable to drafts of official documents, proposed official symbols and signs, which can be copyrighted. Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps. ↑ Official documents, state symbols and signs of 14 other Soviet Republics are the subject of law of their legal successors. See respective license tags.

for State emblems and official signs (flags, armorial bearings, decorations, monetary signs and other State symbols and official signs) of Russian Federation

I changed tag. Is it correct?
Thank you for assistance.
Regards,
Petunpetun32 (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32[reply]

Yes, this correct license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день, что не правильно было при загрузки этих файлов?[edit]

File:Нич Мария Михайловна (1922).jpg

File:Однокласова загальноосвітня школа, Великий Полюхів, список учнів 1926 р.стр.2.jpg

File:Однокласова загальноосвітня школа, Великий Полюхів, список учнів 1926 р.стр.1.jpg

File:Масломичі, Грубешівський повіт,2000 р., археологічні дослідження.jpg

File:Список впавших старшин, підстаршин та стрільців відділу «Вовків». 1944-1945р.р.jpg

File:Список впавших старшин, підстаршин та стрільців відділу «Вовків». 1944-1945р.р.1.jpg

File:Список впавших старшин, підстаршин та стрільців відділу «Вовків». 1944-1945р.р.2.jpg

File:19.03.1944 р.Протокол з нападу польської банди на с.Козодави.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 23.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 22.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 13.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 12.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 4.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 26.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археалогічні дослідження, могила 19, епоха ранього бронзу, в могилі біля дивно положеного людського скелету було 10.jpg

File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 3.jpg

File:В. Коман - археологічні дослідження в Черничині. 1981-1985р.р.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1915. Мазур К.Д.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1915.Писарчук О.Ф.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916. Мазур М.В.1.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916. Мазур М.В.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916.Рабчук М.А.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916.Сабарна А.М.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916.Сабарна М.М.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1917. Мазур П.Д.1.jpg

File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1917. Мазур П.Д.jpg

File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Бахмачук І.В.jpg

File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Біда П.І.jpg

File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Войтович В.М.jpg

File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Цимборский І.П.jpg

File:Масломичі. Марія та Віра Сивак. Період міжвоєнний.jpg

File:Брати Володимир Сивак, 1923 р.н., і Євген Сивак 1927 р.н. Черничин.jpg

File:Переселеньска карта, видавана сім'ї Сівак, село Масломичі, під час операції Вісла.1947 р.jpg

File:Село Стрільці, Холмщина,1938 р. Родина Струцюків Георгій (Юрій) та Ганна,діти Йосип та Софія.jpg

File:С.Стрільці, Холмщина. Церква і дзвінниця. Міжвоєнні роки.jpg

File:С.Стрільці, Холмщина. Дзвінниця. Міжвоєнні роки.jpg

File:Ікона св.Юрія XVII ст., з церкви в с.Стрільці, Холмщина.Після зруйнування церкви 1938р., знаходиться в церкві св. Івана Теолога в Холмі.jpg

File:Ікона Покрови Пресвятої Богородиці з с.Стрільці, Холмщина.Після зруйнування церкви 1938р. ікона знаходиться в церкви св. Івана Тео.jpg

File:Холмщина, село Стрільці. Діти перед церквою св.Юрія. Міжвоєнні роки.jpg

File:Холмщина, село Стрільці. Іконостас в церкві св.Юрія 1938 р.jpg

File:Холмщина, село Стрільці. Церква св.Юрія розібрана 1938 р.jpg

File:Чульчиці.40-ві ХХ ст. Церква св. Олексія.jpg

File:Столпє.Сторожова вежа з ХІІ ст.Фото з 60-тих років.jpg

File:Вежа у Столп'є.1909. Російська листівка.jpg

File:Вежа у Столп'є.1909 рік. Російська листівка.jpg

File:1900,Вежа в Столпє.jpg

File:Вежа в Белавіно 1891. 2 версти від Холма.jpg

File:Вежа в Белавіно-реконструкції вежі в Белавіно згідно Константина Прожогі.jpg

File:21-23.10.1941 рік.Соборне зібрання Холмської єпархії.jpg

File:Холм 1920. Церковне свято в кафедральному соборі Богородиці.jpg

File:Холмський собор Богородиці.Вигляд до 1875 р.jpg

File:Холм.1916р. Іконостас і розписи Холмського собору Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм.1939.Дзвінниця Кафедрального Собору Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм.1916.Кафедральний собор.jpg

File:Холм.1916.Катедра Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм.1916.Іконостас катедри.jpg

File:Холм.1916.jpg

File:Холм.1910.Кафедральний собор.jpg

File:Холм,1917.Кафедральний собор.jpg

File:Холм,1916.Соборний комплекс Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм 1915. Собор Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм 1917.Кафедральний собор.jpg

File:Холм 1916.Соборний комплекс Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм 1913.Собор Різдва Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм 1911.Собор Різдва Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм 1910.Кафедральний собор.jpg

File:Холм 1910.Кафедральний собор (2).jpg

File:Холм 1905. Холмський кафедральний собор Богородиці.jpg

File:Холм 1905-1909. Єпископ Євлогій (Георгієвський) в Холмському соборі Богородиці.jpg

File:Соборний комплекс Пресвятої Богородиці (Холм)1910.jpg

File:Іконостас і розписи Холмського собору Богородиці.1915.jpg

File:Памятка повроту собору православним 19.05.1940.jpg

File:1916.Холмський кафедральний собор Богородиці.jpg

File:1917. Холмський кафедральний собор Богородиці.jpg

File:1916 Холмський собор Богородиці.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jurek.was (talk • contribs) 15:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Теги статусе авторских прав явно некорректные. Смотрите Commons:Copyright rules by territory для стран происхождения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Какая проблема с этим файлом?[edit]

Что не так сделано при загрузки здесь File:Петро Гнида. Станиця ОУН села Великий Полюхів 1939-1949.jpg.?

Кто является автором обложки? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос к EugeneZelenko по его сообщению от 23 марта 2020 для Brsboris[edit]

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko. Вы написали, что загруженные мною файл File:Art Museums and Exhibitions of St. Petersburg.webm является производной работой. так как содержит фотографии других изображений и скульптур. Файл представляет собой видео о художественных музеях и выставочных залах. Фото и видео сделаны на публичных площадках со свободным доступом и возможностью фотосъемки. Файл не посвящен конкретно каким либо авторам произведений. Часто даже и невозможно сказать, кто автор изображенных произведений. Часть фото включает "картины" на стенах зданий. В тоже время эти изображения не взяты ни из каких книг или сайтов, а являются ЛИЧНО мной сделанными фото объектов, представленных на публичное обозрение. В этих условиях я просто не могу ничего добавить к правам по использованию изображений. Видео не предполагает коммерческого использования. Я только-только начал взаимодействие с Wikimedia Commons и могу еще не полностью понимать правила. Если такие материалы не допустимы к размещению, то я удалю данный файл. С наилучшими пожеланиями Brsboris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brsboris (talk • contribs) 09:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Смотрите, пожалуйста, w:ru:Производное произведение и w:ru:Свобода панорамы. Если снятые изображения не являются общественным достоянием (что надо установить для каждого произведения), то видео придётся удалить. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

License tag for Wiki82esh[edit]

This user's help request has been resolved
If you have more questions, feel free to make another {{helpme}} request.

Forgive my copyright ignorance! my name - Wiki82esh I have two groups of photos: 1. book covers 2. family photos All books and photographs are in USMMH. Help me clarify the license tag. 79.179.116.207 21:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For book covers, please ask artists/copyrights holders to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review.

You need to find out if historical photos are in public domain or not. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant countries.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent user[edit]

Hi! EugeneZelenko. Can you look this please? File:Emilia Schneider.jpg was uploaded by an user extremely similar to this Pepperspops, who has already been warned for uploading images without permission. Greetings. --Vareloco (talk) 06:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Best way to deal with such situation is to file request on Commons:Requests for checkuser. Sorry, I don't have necessary permissions to investigate myself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Logos[edit]

I noticed I had gotten two different messages about logos i've uploaded to Wikimedia Commons being potential copyright violations. One of them is a screenshot I took the other is a logo of hospital service. If I cannot determine the license, how am I supposed to upload the logo and screenshot (that I took) to Wikipedia? I notice Wikipedia has many, many logos in infoboxes. If it cannot be uploaded on Commons, is it possible to add the logo to Wikipedia directly (without being on Commons)? I see the logo for Mercy Hospital proper is licensed under Wikipedia Non-Free Content Criteria #4? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdadsuper (talk • contribs) 16:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Screenshots. However you could upload such files to projects that allow non-free media, for example, English Wikipedia.

This particular logo is {{PD-textlogo}}.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How do I modify the Harlem Arts Festival Poster that was deleted?[edit]

Hello! This file was deleted, however it definitely has legal status to be up as it is common use. I may have marked this wrong - its definitely an image that is clearly from Harlem Arts Festival's website and allowed to be used (since it was a public flyer and posted to illustrate previous events). How do I change this?

Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Articlegooroo (talk • contribs) 02:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When something is posted on Internet this fact doesn't mean that it could be used for any purpose. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your WikiCommons request[edit]

Dear Wikipedia User, kindly check Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Polegåarden. --Polegåarden (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These maps are not your own work. If they are in public domain you need to use proper license tags. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jobsworth. Get a life. --Polegåarden (talk) 21:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Echelle de cochard.pdf[edit]

Hi, if you look at the text of the PDF, it includes multiple notice that is is licenced GFDL/CC-BY, so permission is not necessary. However, it is mostly text, so... --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 14:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please add reference to page with permission into file description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneously deleted band logo[edit]

You erroneously deleted gloryful's band logo even though it was uploaded by the right holder of the logo. Please undo the deletion and re-insert the logo on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.173.228.162 (talk) 22:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify which file you meant. Or login, so I could see it in your deleted contributions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lullwater (band) issue with deleted photos[edit]

Can you explain why you deleted photos from Lullwater (band) Wiki page? These were my photos so no permission for any outside source was needed to post on Wikipedia. Lullwaterfan (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload photo in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kohei Matsushita IMG 1143-3 20200203.jpg[edit]

Евгений, добрый день! Не могли бы Вы почистить историю файла и поставить защиту? --ManFromNord (talk) 07:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Евгений, а можете вернуть верное имя автора файла [1]? --ManFromNord (talk) 07:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Извиняюсь, не обратил внимания сразу. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:Kashish MIQFF Logo.jpg[edit]

You have deleted the file File:Kashish MIQFF Logo.jpg we uploaded of the KASHISH Mumbai film festival logo which I had uploaded and used in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KASHISH_Mumbai_International_Queer_Film_Festival This logo is created by myself Sridhar Rangayan and is the main logo of the film festival which I organize. I'm the festival director and main designer. Please approve the same and restore it back. Thanks, Sridhar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sridhar Rangayan (talk • contribs) 09:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sridhar Rangayan: Not EugeneZelenko, but answering anyway. You would have to send an email to the OTRS team to prove that you hold the copyright of the said logo. And please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) at the end. Thanks, pandakekok9 09:55, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files nominated for deletion[edit]

Dear sir, there seems to be a misunderstanding since you have nominated all the files I ever uploaded on this sites for deletion while only one of the files was from the official website and that too was a logo and I explicitly mentioned it. Please let me know where my fault lies Thank you--Dpb696 (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But some of the images are scanned copies of printed photos. --Dpb696 (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who made photos you scanned? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did myself--Dpb696 (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rescan them again in same high resolution. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But, I don't have the the printed ones with me now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpb696 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload them later. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But I would also like to mention that when we scanned the images at higher resolutions, they were much worse, like grainy, so this is the best version I think--Dpb696 (talk) 17:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't observe too huge scan artifacts on 300 dpi. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the technical details, is dpi also called resolution? because at higher values, the images became worse! --Dpb696 (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, dpi is unit of measurement for resolution. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, could you also please undo your decision to delete the files?--Dpb696 (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you didn't do anything to proof authorship, I still think that your files should be deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand what to say and how to rectify my fault, since you think there is. Can you guide me through the process? --Dpb696 (talk) 19:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-read entire conversation. I suggested you ways to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I read the whole conversation. Please spare the others, you can delete these images which are not in use:

I still maintain my stand that all the images I've ever uploaded to this site are my own works, except the logo which I specifically, explicitly mentioned while uploading. Thank you.--Dpb696 (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lets wrap up this discussion unless you will have new arguments. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I never argued with you, not even in the least. Sorry, if you felt that way. But I would like to explain myself, all these places are in Mumbai and all close to each other, all related to Hinduja Hospitals, all places are accessible to public, nothing is classified. The reason that are they are of different resolutions is because they are taken at different times, as far back as 1997 when there was no digital camera, hence they had to be scanned, some are taken by mobiles and that too of different companies, types and models like some are from basic phones and others from smartphones, some pictures are taken in low-light, others in daylight, but all are taken by me. That's all I have in my defence. Thanks.--Dpb696 (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion are not necessarily assumes arguing :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KWiN[edit]

Czegoś Pan usunął LOGO Konfederacji Wolność i Niepodległość? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krzysztof Kajzer (talk • contribs) 17:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Polish enough to write on it :-( Logo seems complex enough to be copyrighted. See Commons:Licensing. Actually it was deleted by other administrator. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Wettin bot[edit]

Dear EugeneZelenko,

Do you think you will have to respond to Karl Wettin (WMSE)s question here during the day today? Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About Grande galerie de l'Évolution-nouveau-logo.png[edit]

Hi Eugene ! Grande galerie de l'Évolution-nouveau-logo.png [2] have exactly the same status as [3]. But I fail to upload it only in the french Commons. Could you transfert it please? Thank you! --Maisrimer (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is clearly marked as copyrighted on French Wikipedia. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes: it is clearly marked as copyrighted on French Wikipedia by me. But I fail to upload it only in the french Commons & I need some help for it. Thanks !--Maisrimer (talk) 09:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it logo of government institution? In some countries official symbols are excepted from copyrights. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Hello!

Why did I get this notice? I suspect that everyone that has uploaded a new version of that file automatically get noticed but I was only trying to remove the copyrighted material, that is the profile picture.Jonteemil (talk) 15:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice that file had several uploaders. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. No problem.Jonteemil (talk) 15:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for deletion en masse without proper argumentation[edit]

Could you please explain your deletion requests en masse? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ke_an#Notification_about_possible_deletion

Most of them are historical documents from centuries ago with expired copyright rights. You put uniform comment everywhere: "Historical photos, documents, maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected."

You proposed to delete even the document from 1531 with expired copyright: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:First_page_of_the_copy_ofLaurentius_(1531)_of_the_First_Statute_of_Lithuania.jpg

Are you kidding? If not could you please explain real causes for deletion proposal?

-- Ke an (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If copyrights are expired, proper public domain tags should be used. Sorry, but Creative Commons licenses are artifact of 21th century. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYRU[edit]

Why did you delete the logo? Jobenbrian21 (talk) 16:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both logos have non-trivial design. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Как я могу подтвердить авторские права на фотографии?[edit]

Здравствуйте! Подскажите, как я должна подтвердить авторские права на фото? File:Елена Максимова Malade.jpg File:Елена Максимова Маладе.jpg Это фотографии с фотосессии, сделанные мной и у меня есть разрешение от артиста на их использование для его статьи в Википедии.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by A0924 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--A0924 (talk) 15:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вам надо послать послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Для ускореня обработки стоит оставить запрос на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About deletion[edit]

I uploaded File:T. Galib.jpg and File:T. Galib (Wikipedia page pic).jpg so that I could use them on my Wikipedia user page but now I don't need them. So, you can delete. T. Galib (talk) 13:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

Hello, would you be willing to delete this revision of File:Michael J. Hunter.jpg? It was uploaded by User:AdidasZRO on April 18, 2020, overriding the current version. Thanks, Corky 19:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Past deletion request[edit]

@EugeneZelenko: where may I review the deletion request that was made for these? I wonder what the debate was about. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Chaipau

Thank you,

Chaipau (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Project scope and w:en:Help:Table or its translation to you native language. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File: Le transport lagunaire, has been nominated for deletion. why?[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko, How are you? You have nominated my video for deletion why? The music used in the video as background music is from Youtube audio library and the exact title of the music is Ticker by Silent Partner. It is a No copyright music. Please, reconsider not deleting my file. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamboo19 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File is not deleted yet. You need to provide link(s) to music source/license in file description. Also video could not be you own work, because it incorporates other work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me understand this:"Also video could not be you own work, because it incorporates other work". What does this mean? Thank you. Best regards Kamboo19 (talk) 10:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided link(s) to music source/license in file description. Now, what should i do next? Thank you. Best Regards. Kamboo19 (talk) 11:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, license has limitations incompatible with Commons:Licensing. Please read carefully it as well as About using the music of section. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Is it possible to remove the music without deleting the video? Kamboo19 (talk) 17:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, you could reupload video without music. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will i be disqualified from the Wiki Loves Africa 2020 Contest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamboo19 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why it could be? Because of absence of music? Or date of upload? You could upload new version of file and then delete original. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Kamboo19 (talk) 17:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can i use this song Rogue Planet by Kevin Hartnell as background music in the video? Here is the License.Kamboo19 (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you could use it. But resulting work would not be your own and you should credit source of music in file description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do so.Kamboo19 (talk) 15:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded the new video. How can i remove the first one? Kamboo19 (talk) 16:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I could remove old file. However, you need to remove own work claim from file description. Correct credits would be separate for video and music. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it is done. Kamboo19 (talk) 11:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please also replace {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where do i replace it? i'm tired. Lol. Kamboo19 (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In licensing section of File:Le Transport Lagunaire à Abidjan (STL) réalisé par Bouba Kam's.webm. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is done. Kamboo19 (talk) 15:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

Hi Eugene, Is it possible to delete this image? it has a very misleading/inaccurate caption, unexistent source, and no proper licensing? [4] Thank you Aeengath (talk) 12:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated image for deletion. There are probability that proper source information and license would be provided. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! yes as long as they can provide their source information and license Aeengath (talk) 09:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Historical photos, documents, newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.[edit]

Здравствуйте, User:EugeneZelenko

Вы бы могли описать проблему конкретно по каждой из изображений, что необходимо добавить либо исправить? Согласно Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Kyrgyzstan официальные документы и газетные сводки, то бишь и исторические вне авторских прав. А фотокарточки являются нашей семейной собственностю, так как я являюсь правнуком данного человека.

Спасибо. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.djan (talk • contribs) 12:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вы глубоко заблуждаетесь. Закон об авторском праве охватывает все эти произведения. Вы уже нарушили право авторов на имя, сказав, что это Ваши собственные произведения. Обладание копией не означает обладанием авторскими правами. Возможно, эти произведения находятся в общественном достоянии, но для этого надо указать все необходимые сведения и исправить лицензию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Просмотрите, пожалуйста. Информация о данных изображениях была исправлена и даны соответсвующие лицензии. --A.djan (talk) 04:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

С документами всё в порядке. Для неизвестных авторов используйте шаблон {{Unknown author}}/{{Unknown photographer}}. Для известных надо попытаться найти годы жизни. Я думаю, что File:Руч кенчи гезити - Төрөкул Жанузаков.jpg никак не подпадает под лицензию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо, спасибо. А подскажите тогда, пожалуйста, что требуется для размещения такого рода материала, т.е. газетной статьи? Письменное разрешение автора статьи или издательства газеты? --A.djan (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Надо почитать закон об авторском праве. Скорее всего, от каждого автора, так как газета - труд коллективный, но возможны нюансы с передачей авторских прав издательству. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stop Luka Sticker.jpg[edit]

File:Stop Luka Sticker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Informacja o pliku File:Tadeusz Wojtaszek w stroju rektora (lata 70 XX w.).jpg[edit]

Hello, thank You for the information. I uploaded this file directly from the University of Agriculture in Cracow Archive (I am the head of this unit), but I don't know anything about that photography (maybe the date 70' XX), so please delete it. I think it would be better to don't break any law. I will replace this in article with my own work. Thank You for other information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paweł Jakubiec (talk • contribs) 11:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland. Photo may be in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galindo-Villegas - COVID-19.pdf[edit]

I have accepted permission for File:Galindo-Villegas - COVID-19.pdf under Ticket:2020050310004247, however, the entire process was not necessary as the text of the document (on page 2) clearly indicates that ~~the images~~ it was already release under a {{Cc-by-4.0}} (with a clickable link to the licence within the document itself). --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 18:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was unclear if author is uploader or not, so how valid id claim of own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{No permission since}} would not have been the correct tag, regardless of the claim of {{Own}} as it's clearly and explicitly stated that the document was already release under a {{Cc-by-4.0}}. {{No source since}} may have been a better choice. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 23:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it's not easy to check each document reported in User:OgreBot/Notable uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DELETION OF MY WIKICOMMONS VIDEO ON THE MATATUS IN AFRICA, KENYA. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AFRICA_ON_THE_MOVE_2020.webm[edit]

It has come to my attention that my post in participating in the wikicommons 2020 Africa on the rise was put up for deletion. Why if I may ask? I personally took them and what i majorly wanted to be showcased was how the youth in Kenya get jobs in this industry such as being conductors, drivers and even the artist that draw on these matatus. I DONOT CLAIM the art, supporting and promoting what my fellow young men can don In Kenya.

KINDLY LOOK AT THIS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pravin Brown (talk • contribs) 10:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works that mentioned in deletion request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deletion Request[edit]

The picture I submitted is mine. A friend snapped with his phone. I have the unedited version. I can submit it if the need be. Princebarak2 (talk) 15:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify which file in question. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for nominating all my uploads for deletion.[edit]

Excepted for file:廖有方.jpg was created by artist Li Gongqin (1049-1106), all my uploads were shared on public websites (these websites upload free images from National Museum of Vietnam because all authors of these paintings were anonymous and had died over 200+ years). So they now belonged to public domain in Vietnam or China. Zhu Zi Ling (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If such work are in public domain, proper license tags must be used. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation[edit]

Hi Eugene! I took these photos from my great-grandparents works (Amleto Cencioni). Our family owns these paintings. What kind of confirmation do you need? Sarah Bernabei (talk) 15:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In which country did you great-grandparent live? What are dates of life? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir the photo's i uploaded on the Lumpa Church article are not copyrighted.[edit]

Sir the photo's i uploaded on the Lumpa Church article are not copyrighted, and i didn't say that i took those photos. You didn't have to nomimate them all for deletion. All the incidents in that article took place in my country, i've been researching on the lumpa church and the photos i uploaded don't seem to be copyrighted i tried to search for some information but nothing came up. You can't do this, please! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlyonheart (talk • contribs) 15:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If these photos are in public domain, you should provide proper source information and license tags. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Khudyakov Photo[edit]

Hi, all of these photos were taken by myself or my family with the permission of the artist. The artist is now deceased so I'm not sure how you would like for me to prove this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waxypotato (talk • contribs) 16:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask artist to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The artist is not alive. The photos were taken by me and my family, what is the reason I cannot use them?

Yous should ask same from artist's heir(s). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Belarus[edit]

Запрашаю стаць сябрам журы міжнароднага фотаспаборніцтва «Вікі любіць Зямлю-2020» у Беларусі. Спаборніцтва пройдзе ў чэрвені, пасьля чаго ў ліпені-жніўні журы вызначыць 10 мясцовых пераможцаў праз прыладу фотаацэнкі Commons:Montage.--User:W 21:12, 8 траўня 2020 (UTC+3)

Вялікі дзякуй за запрашэньне, але, на жаль майго пачуцьця прыгожага і досьведу ў тэхнічных дэталях недастаткова для гэтага :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deletion requests[edit]

Hi there, apologies if I'm doing this wrong as I'm very new to Wikimedia. My Psychology infographic was "listed at Commons:Deletion" for "Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images" To note the second issure first, the pictures were drawn by me. For the first issue I'm a bit confused. All documents cited were paraphrased and the information used, hence me citing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akormanik (talk • contribs) 20:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Project scope. I don't think that any psychology-related homework should be uploaded to Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo_Pozzo_Live.jpg[edit]

Hi Eugene, I come on this topic to complete with my own request. You requested deletion for the logo Pozzo Live with the same classification (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Logo_Pozzo_Live.jpg) Actually, I am still writig the article so the logo is logically unused to date. But will be eventually when I validate the publication of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakapoff (talk • contribs) 15:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Thanks in advance for your understanding & help --Sakapoff (talk) 15:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if logo will be used, it'll not be deleted. But please read about w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics, much better format for such images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing c:File:Dahong.jpg and Removing c:File:Taipei Red Lion FC crest.png[edit]

Dear Eugene,

I would like to restate Taipei Red Lions F.C. crest and mascot images to the club wikipedia page

I believe there is no copyright violation in the use of these two files. Please help me to confirm if it is possible to upload them.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaoTaiwan (talk • contribs) 15:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These files are definitely non-trivial logos and copyrights on them belong to sport club. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I own the copyrights (and the club), I wish to upload them to the club wikipedia page same as other clubs (Juventus, Real Madrid, etc.) have it. How can I do it?

Please send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review in files undeletion. Alternatively you could upload non-free media to projects that allow it, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to send permissions but will try to learn it. I believe I upload these two files to the English Wikipedia. Is it ok if I upload them again to the English Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taipei_Red_Lions_F.C.) ?

Yes, you need to upload logos locally on English Wikipedia, not Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaoTaiwan (talk • contribs) 15:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas Wrestling Club logo deletion[edit]

Hi,

I've got the autorisation of usage by the president of this wrestling federation. What can I do to add again the logo ?

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSoC (talk • contribs) 13:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask president to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review in files undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

images deleted[edit]

You have deleted all my pics, that were legit or in public domain. WHY?Bibarte (talk) 09:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, all these images were not you own work. If you are willing to fix source information and license tags, please file request on Commons:Undeletion requests. Please don't use archived talk pages in future. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[union-note-1] Official documents, state symbols and signs of 14 other Soviet Republics are the subject of law of their legal successors. See respective license tags.

[1]