User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive25

File:THE WARRIOR short solo by Peter Graigs.webm

Not sure where to talk to you but I am the original author composer — Preceding unsigned comment added by G13mp (talk • contribs) 00:28, 08 December 2016 (UTC)

Please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Fritz Karl Preikschat

Dear EugeneZelenko, Please see that source has been updated for those documents. Thanks, Preiker1

• File:Correspondence FKP with Russian colleagues, 1990-91.pdf
• File:Correspondence between Fritz Preikschat and Russia colleagues, 1990-1991.pdf
• File:Photo of Boeing team for Technical Paper Award in 1970.pdf
• File:1970 Technical Paper Award for Boeing.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Preiker1 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Answered on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Preiker1. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Ошибка

Здравствуйте. Недавно вы отправили мне сообщение о том, что данный файл File:Лабораторія мікроклонального розмноження рослин.jpg не имеет указанных источников и авторства, и может быть удалён. Я проверил описание, и там ясно видно что и авторство и источник изображения указаны согласно всем правилам википедии. Данное изображение брало участие в конкурсе научных фотографий в прошлом году и получило одно из призовых мест, думаю если бы там были какие-либо ошибки то мне бы сообщили намного раньше. Надеюсь на скорое решение данного вопроса. С уважением - Almanahe~ukwiki (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Это коллаж. Если Вы - автор всех фотографий, загрузите их для продтверждения авторства. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Готово. Вот оригиналы использованных фотографий с указанным авторством: File:Колба із клонованою рослиною in vitro.jpg, File:Стелажі із клонованими рослинами.jpg, File:Молоді клони рослин in vitro.jpg.--Almanahe~ukwiki (talk) 16:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Добавьте, пожалуйста, ссылки на оригиналы в коллаж, и тогда можно удалить шаблон с запросом на источники. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Готово. Ссылки на оригиналы теперь указаны в источниках в описании к коллажу. Шаблон с запросом удаляете вы, или нужно самому? --Almanahe~ukwiki (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Я удалил шаблон. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

ni_ka's works

Dear EugeneZelenko.

Thanks for your message about concerning of copywriting of ni_ka's works. I am really happy to hear your attention of these works. However, I already contacted with her directly, so that these works were permitted to upload.

File:ARPoetry1.jpg File:ARPoetry2.jpg File:ARPoetry3.jpg File:ARPoetry4.jpg File:ARPoetry5.jpg File:ARPoetry6.jpg File:ARPoetry7.jpg

If you have any question about these works licence, please ask her directly. Her e-mail address is nika_nika_tipo@yahoo.co.jp.

Best,

はかいし (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please ask her to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

My upload on Commons

I only uploaded that to see how it works you know, uploading and stuff so you welcome to delete it Refiloehape (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

NetflixDVD file

the netflix dvd file was a photo i took myself and uploaded for wikipedia use. i had every right to upload it and share it. --CityMorgue (talk) 02:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. You make same photo if disk has trivial design (like only text from regular font). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Yadira Pascault Orozco-photo by Carlos Safa.jpg

Hi Euguene. I created the image File:Yadira Pascault Orozco-photo by Carlos Safa.jpg before digital photography was commonly used, it was shot on a Nikon FE with a 50mm lens with 3200 ISO low light Ektachrome film. It was a full body shot, that I needed to crop for the purpose of Wikipedia...so yes, it is indeed a grainy, lower resolution image (due to the high speed film and the tight crop). It is lower resolution than I desire, nonetheless representing the Orozco at the age she was a common face on Mexican Televisoion. As I shot her more than once, I will continue looking thru my files to uncover an image of Orozco shot more closely, which should improve the resolution somewhat because I will not need to crop so much. In the meantime, please consider leaving this image up. Much appreciation. (Carlos.Safa (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlos.Safa (talk • contribs) 15:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

You could upload scan of entire image to support you claim of authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Dario-dedicated.jpg

Hi Eugene! I saw that you had to delete the pic I uploaded for a lack of proof of the original author's permission to upload it (I did receive his permission, but I guess I need to show more proof?). I also had another one deleted (same subject matter & author), and I was wondering if you could help me out with this? I'm still new to Wiki and this was the first time I'd added images. I would love to add them back again, but want to make sure everything is legit and they stay up. Any advice you can give me would be wonderful. Thanks! PCB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplechocolatebunny (talk • contribs) 03:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Please ask copyright holder (musician? record company?) to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion.

Alternatively you could upload it to projects which allow non-free content, like English Wikipedia.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tati language Nastaliq.png

Hello Eugene. I'm sorry if my english is very poor. Now i'm reading Commons:Project scope, I think File:Tati language Nastaliq.png isn't out of Commons:Project scope. What does 'Unused text document of questionable notability' mean? Do you mean notability of Tati language is questionable?! Or you want say Nastaliq is an infamous writing style for Tati? Because some other Iranian languages have Nastaliq style of language's name on CommonsWiki. Thanks. Farhad.2119. 10:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

My point was if Tati language is use Arabic script, why this text example could not be written as plain wiki-text? If this is specific kind of calligraphy, will be good idea to recreate it in SVG. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. Yes Tati language is use Arabic alphabet, I can prove it. What do I do? And what is wrong with PNG? Thanks. Farhad.2119. 20:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Is this image calligraphy or regular text? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually Nastaliq is a calligraphy font. In the Tati language, Nastaliq is use for title (The book's title) or Tati poems. This image is calligraphy of 'Tati' word. For the regular Tati texts, we use common fonts of Arabic alphabet. Thanks. Farhad.2119. 05:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add this explanation of deletion request page. If you'll have time, please try to recreate it in SVG format. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I added this explanation on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tati language Nastaliq.png. That's ok, if PNG isn't good, I'll recreate it in SVG format soon. Thanks. 03:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhad.2119 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

PNG is bitmap, SVG is vector format. So SVG will be much more useful for people who will want to use larger version. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Вопрос

На какой странице переименовывают страницы участников? — Khilletzbal (talk) 03:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Вы хотите переименовать учётную запись или только страницы? В первом случае запросы подаются на m:Steward requests/Username changes. Во втором это делается администраторами локально. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

+ Javier Del Río Alba.jpg

Hi Eugene:

I´m peruvian, from Arequipa. Please, tell me why this picture will be deleted. Archbishop gave me for that purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josalberto88 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Who is photographer? If this photo was made by other person, you need to ask him/her to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Удаление фотографий участника Guruwik

Здравствуйте, Евгений. Я публиковал фотографии для двух статей: "Барадийн Базар Барадиевич" и "Балдано Сэрэнжаб". Но, они с постоянным упорством выставляются вами на удаление. Из-за этого разрушаются, связанные с ними статьи. Я представляю группу родственников, достаточно пожилых, среди которых я более или менее могу пользоваться интернетом. Нам стоит больших усилий, чтобы вытаскивать имена, убиенных и репрессированных родственников из забвения и очень больно, когда сталкиваемся продолжением этих действий уже в настоящее время на просторах интернета. Видимо, моих знаний не достаточно для того, чтобы понять причины столь предвзятого со стороны вас к нам отношения. Нам казалось, роль администраторов здесь для того, чтобы помогать, а не пользоваться правом разрушать. Поэтому обращаемся к вам с просьбой не прикрываясь непонятными шаблонами, простым языком объяснить, что мы по вашему делаем не так и как лучше поступить. Мы прямые потомки и родственники Базара Барадийна и Сэрэнжаба Балдано, выставляемые фотографии являются нашей собственностью и более ни у кого они не могут быть. Поверьте, мы много лет занимаемся изысканиями. Если вы хотите установить кармическую связь с нами и убиенными, то хотелось бы, чтобы вы были на стороне добра, а не зла. Что касается фотографий скульптур Сэрэнжаба Балдано, то все они сделаны по заказу самого скульптора. Абсолютно все. За многие из них он, зачастую "расплачивался" своими произведениями, соответственно "выкупал" их с полным правом распоряжения ими. Я взял слова в кавычки, так как все фотографы были его близкими друзьями и, естественно делали фотографии не из побуждений наживы. Возможно, вам современному человеку это трудно понять. Если у вас есть претензии к старым фотографиям, то мы решили выставить собственные и я сфотографировал работы сам, в замен удаленных вами (именно так). Все, сфотографированные мною скульптуры находятся в распоряжении и владении дочери скульптора, Индиры Балдано и сделаны они не только с разрешения, но и просьбы. Она прилагает много усилий для популяризации искусства своего отца: организует выставки, создала сайт [1], готовит к выпуску альбомы и публикации о нем. Мы находимся в сильном шоке от ваших действий. Никого не встречали за последнее время, столь разрушительных и недоброжелательных действий, включая органы МВД где даже там находим понимание и помощь в доступе к архивам, с внятными ответами на запросы и т.п. Поэтому, еще раз обращаемся с просьбой разъяснить, что мы делаем по вашему не так и как нам избежать подобного в дальнейшем. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guruwik (talk • contribs) 07:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

В подобных случаях наследники должны послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Если фотографии сделаны другими людьми, но надо получить разрешение и от них. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Permission

It's on the fucking page. Can you read? The Master (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

It should be in Commons:OTRS and sent from person who gave permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I forwarded the permission e-mail I received from the copyright holder to the OTRS e-mail addres, it contains their e-mail address and names. The Master (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

New Renault logo

File:Renault 2015 logo.svg	Returning new Renault logo
	In Infobox, i am added new Renault logo. Do not delete new Renault logo Matvei Gromov (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

You could upload such non-trivial logos in projects which allow non free content, like Russian Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

postcards in day for night article.

Hi.

I sent the following to the pages for each of the two postcards currently included in the article:

"I did not add this graphic or its companion, so I have no idea of its provenance. I did massage the text a bit to bring it more in line with the rest of the entry. However, I don't think tinted postcards need inclusion in an article devoted to motion picture techniques."Jim Stinson (talk) 00:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I will add a note to the original article's talk page suggesting removal of the entire postcard text.Jim Stinson (talk) 00:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I will retire this community. Please lock my account and block me permanently.

Good bye, wikipedia. I will retire this site and never come back again. Can't you block my account permanently?Line 8 the Pink (talk) 00:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

I don't see a reason for permanent block. You could just stop contributing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

‘Notification about possible deletion’ with remedy”

RE: Runaway Nightmare photos nominated for deletion

Good evening EugeneZelenko,

I appreciate the flagging of 6 photos from ‘Runaway Nightmare’ that you have tagged with ‘possible deletion.’

I have sent a ‘Release of Rights to a file’ to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. to remedy this serious issue. I accidentally (foolishly) bypassed the Release of Rights contract and uploaded pictures to the site with only basic information.

I have affirmed that I am the sole owner of the copyright of the media work of the following five files;

File:Runaway Nightmare Movie Marquee 02.jpg is a Private photo from Michael Cartel with permission for use.

File:Losing the desert with five shots remaining.jpg is a (Private photo From Mari Cartel who gave me permission to use)

File:Cult girls sit looking at worm ranchers.jpg is a Still shot from the Runaway Nightmare movie set by Mari Cartel, with permission for use.

File:Runaway Nightmare Movie Marquee 02.jpg is a Still shot from the Runaway Nightmare movie set by Mari Cartel, with permission for use.

File:Vampiria living portrait.jpg is a Still shot from the Runaway Nightmare movie set by Mari Cartel, with permission for use.

I have REMOVED File:Runaway Nightmare Ralph ending.jpg for reasons other than copyright issues.

I know that you will inform me if there’s something else to be done.

Thank you for your criticism and efficiency,

  Carnymike (talk) 13:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Please ask copyright holder (studio? director? photographer?) to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Album art

Hi Eugene! I recently uploaded Wild_love_cashmerecat.jpg and I saw that it was flagged for lack of permission. Is there a special way that album art goes through this or do I have to contact the artist and ask for explicit permission? --IanLulz (talk) 00:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

You need to ask copyright holder (record company? musician? photographer?) to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Removing File

Hi, EugeneZelenko,

I sow that you remove File: Dimitar KUZMANOV.jpg, because of low resolution and etc. that show you maybe it is not my own work. It should be better to discuss this subject before removing. I hope that the new picture has got enough resolution for you.

Batesava — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batesava (talk • contribs) 10:23, 01 September 2016 (UTC)

You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Deletion from AlexY75

Hello, I've already done a big proposal of deletion of file imported by AlexY75 Commons:Deletion requests/File:M3.pdf for same type of file. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

I notice that, but unfortunately MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js doesn't allow to extend existing deletion request :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Hi, EugeneZelenko,

File:Споменица.jpg File: Spomenica.jpg File:Илија Петрушев Цветковски.jpg File: Elias Petrushev Cvetkovski.jpg

I got your message, little is unclear what was wrong with my article,you want to delete article, the reason you gave was: Historical photo and document. Proper author / date / country of creation information should be supplied to determine the status of copyrights.

It is a photography of my grandfather, a soldier in the People's Liberation Army in world war II, how can ask for the copyright of the photo, another document is the Document -medal for the soldiers-partisans killed in the People's Liberation Army in world war II,photo and document are my inheritance,and what can i do in this situation. I do not know what to say, wikipedia is proclaimed as a free encyclopedia but obviously not in this case.You are allowing unverified article to be published ,but in this case my article with historical data want to delete. I hope for positive response.

--Ljbsc (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Official documents are often exempted from copyrights, but you need to find relevant public domain tag. If photographer is unknown, approximate date of creation is needed, copyrights may be expired and photo is in public domain now. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for details. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, EugeneZelenko,

File: Spomenica.jpg Податотека:Споменица.jpg File: Elias Petrushev Cvetkovski.jpg Податотека:Илија Петрушев Цветковски.jpg

The picture is from 1938 and memorial document is since 1950(on the document can be seen date 29/11/1950) and according the Bern Convention, Macedonia is a member of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, official documents are in the public domain.Below is article of copyright law for Macedonia.

The Berne Convention states that all works except photographic and cinematographic shall be copyrighted for at least 50 years after the author's death, but parties are free to provide longer terms,[7] as the European Union did with the 1993 Directive on harmonising the term of copyright protection. For photography, the Berne Convention sets a minimum term of 25 years from the year the photograph was created, and for cinematography the minimum is 50 years after first showing, or 50 years after creation if it hasn't been shown within 50 years after the creation. Countries under the older revisions of the treaty may choose to provide their own protection terms, and certain types of works (such as phonorecords and motion pictures) may be provided shorter terms. Macedonia, Republic of[уреди] Copyright in the Republic of Macedonia is governed by the Law on Copyright and Related Rights adopted by the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia on 8 септември 2010. • Copyright works. A work is a copyright work if it is, among other things, a written, spoken, musical, dramatic, photographic, audiovisual, fine art, architectural, applied art, or a cartographic work. • Identified author. The copyright in a work by an identified author expires 70 years from 1 January of the year after the year of the author's death: Article 55 read with Article 60. If the work is created by a number of co-authors, the copyright expires 70 years from 1 January of the year after the year in which the last surviving co-author dies: Articles 56 and 60. • Anonymous and pseudonymous works: The copyright in an anonymous work expires 70 years from 1 January of the year after the year in which the work is first disclosed to the public in a legal manner. The same rule applies to a pseudonymous work unless the true identity of the author is known, or the author discloses his or her identity within 70 years from 1 January of the year after the year in which the first legal disclosure of the work occurs, in which case the 70 p.m.a. rule applies: Articles 57 and 60. If an unpublished work is anonymous, or pseudonymous with the identity of the author unknown, the copyright in it expires 70 years from 1 January of the year after the year in which the work was created: Articles 58 and 60. • Freedom of panorama. Copyrighted architectural or sculptural works permanently exposed in streets, squares, parks or other public places may be used freely.: Article 52. • Official government texts. Official texts of political, legislative, administrative and judicial nature and their official translations are in the public domain: Article 16.

--Ljbsc (talk) 19:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I made some changes,can you check is it now ok or not.

--Ljbsc (talk) 22:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Looks OK. I closed deletion request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you,have a nice day.

--Ljbsc (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Hipòtesi Barcino.jpg

Dear Eugene: I can't understand your advertisement, because the author of that file am I, really. I've made an interpretation of the hypotesis performed in the article en:Barcelona Roman amphitheatre and circus in Wikipedia. Not only in English, but in Catalan, Spanish, Italian, and French too. And I've declarated that it is my own work. That is the unique source of that file. Really.--Climent Sostres (talk) 21:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your file is based on map. Who created it? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

I do'nt know. But I've manipulate this map. For instance, I've deleted some numbers that were no useful for my purpose: some marks are still visible over the map.--Climent Sostres (talk) 23:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

You could recreate map using http://www.openstreetmap.org. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll try it.--Climent Sostres (talk) 23:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mona Lyn Reese - Land of Rest.ogg

Hello Eugene.

I am a professional photographer, audio engineer, author and publisher. Mona Lyn Reese is my wife. We have a music publishing company, Reese & Hassing Music. We have already gone through the OTRS process for her works and recordings. See, for example, the correspondence available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2011091110007024. Please let me know if you have any questions. Many thanks.

Warmest regards,

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnissah (talk • contribs) 01:26, 05 September 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Maria Basile purple scarf.jpg

Hello Eugene.

I am a professional photographer, audio engineer, author and publisher. I am also president of the Board of Trustees of sjDANCEco. See, for example, http://www.sjdanceco.org/board-members--staff.html. All of the publicity photos of company members are those I took myself and are intended for public use, and approved by all of the sitters. See, for example, http://www.sjdanceco.org/artists--dancers.html. All of the publicity photos in the gallery are ones I took myself or else intended for public use, and approved by all of the sitters. See, for example, http://www.sjdanceco.org/gallery.html. Please let me know if you have any questions. Many thanks.

Warmest regards,

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnissah (talk • contribs) 01:38, 05 September 2016 (UTC)

Site doesn't have license statement. You either should add it on the site or sent send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

golden tara ..

Where should i explain my side ? i mean where is the discussion area , Since I'm just a newbie here . thank you! (JournalmanManila (talk))

You could reupload phot in full resolution with EXIF to proof you authorship. Discussion about deletion should be on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Golden tara of agusan.jpg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

забанены фото

Евгений, здравствуйте! что-то Вы постирали все мои картинки( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D0%94%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%A1%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%BE%D0%B2?markasread=3513323#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7Cbase.3DIdw.2Fheading.7D.7D

список того, что я добавлял: File:Von Meck is on the right. 1911..jpg File:Владимир Карлович фон Мекк.jpg - ФОТО ИЗ КНИГИ, ПРАВА НА КОТОРУЮ У МОЕЙ СЕМЬИ File:Жетон Общества дешевых квартир.jpg - ЖЕТОН ИЗ МОЕЙ КОЛЛЕКЦИИ File:Малая серебряная медаль общества Императорского общества для содействия русскому морскому мореходству.jpg File:Диплом. 1901. Малая серебряная медаль общества..jpg - File:Кустодиев, 1912, портрет Николая Карловича фон Мекк.jpg

подскажите, пжл, а разве то что старше 100 лет охраняется законом? или какая причина? ну или что мне надо сделать чтобы я мог опубликовать эти картинки? спасибо! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.27.234.171 (talk) 21:37, 08 September 2016 (UTC)

Все эти изображения не являются Вашими произведениями. Да, скорее всего они перешли в общественное достояние, но надо оформить лицензию и описание подобающим образом. Смотрите также Commons:Copyright rules by territory. Я могу восстановить файлы, если Вы возьмётесь исправить лицензии и описания. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Евгений, я сам делал фото принадлежащих мне вещей. Т.е. у меня есть фото моих предков, сделанные более 100 лет назад и некоторые вещи той же давности. Второй вопрос - если я пойду в музей, где разрешено фотографировать и сделаю фотографию картины, медали, книги или еще чего-нибудь как делать лицензию? Если это сложно, расскажите только про мои вещи (первый вопрос) По данной Вами ссылке не смог разобраться как оформлять лицензию, поясните, пжл. И вы меня не забанили для входа на Викисклад? Не могу войти теперь(( Спасибо! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.27.234.171 (talk) 00:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

В любом случае фотографии других произведений являются Commons:Производные произведения. Дальше всё зависит от произведения. Если оно перешло в общественное достояние, то фотографировать можно, но надо указать, почему это так. Если нет - то надо обратить внимание на Commons:Freedom of panorama.

В случае воспроизведения двухмерных произведение, их воспроизведение не создаёт дополнительных прав в США. В Commons это относится ко всем странам.

В случае семейных фотографий дело может быть запутанным, т.к. их могут делать посторонние люди. Также наследование может быть весь запутанным.

Ваша учётная запись никогда в Commons не блокировалась. Проблемы со входом - по какой-то другой причине.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Удаление моего файла Агитационные наклейки одного из кандидатов праймериз Единой России на одной из торговых точек Екатеринбурга.jpg

Дорогой коллега! Вы удалили сделанный мной файл - Агитационные наклейки одного из кандидатов праймериз Единой России на одной из торговых точек Екатеринбурга.jpg Этот файл никаким авторским правом не защищен, а просто фото киоска в Екатеринбурге, где не разобрать полностью содержание. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Иван Абатуров (talk • contribs) 14:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Наклейки были весьма детальны. Смотрите Commons:Производные произведения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Photos uploaded by Viktorija Daugirdaitė

EugeneZelenko:

You suggested deletion of several of my uploaded photos.

By Lithuanian Law, if picture was taken by anonymous author prior to 70 or more years - it's copyright has expired (Art. 34, Law No. IX-1355 (2003). I added this description within information on several pictures. "In the case of anonymous and pseudonymous works, the term of protection of the authors’ economic rights shall run for 70 years after the work is lawfully made available to the public."

One picture was taken in 1951 - in Khakas Autonomous Oblast, USSR territory - this country does not exist anymore. Probably Russian Laws will apply today.

There are also two photos taken in 1969, I will verify and add information about the author, if possible; give me 1 week for that. Otherwise - please delete them.

Thanks for your collaboration,

Sincerely, Viktorija Daugirdaitė — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viktorija Daugirdaitė (talk • contribs) 08:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

These photos are not your work, so proper public domain tags should be used. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory.

Picture taken by anonymous photographer in 1951 in Russia are not in public domain yet.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

My uploads in Commons

Hello. Today i've got a notification about possible deletion of the ogg &jif files that I have uploaded in wikipedia commons. Reason for the nomination: Songs, album covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s). The thing is that i received all the media from authors directly b the email specially for uploading the to wikipedia. Please help me how can i add the permission. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatev-22 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Please ask copyright holder (musician? record company?) to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Bruno Fornaroli at the City Football Academy.jpg

I posted this on wikipedia commons, and have the photographer's permission. I told him to email the filled out template, and he did that rightly so. How long does it take for the email to be confirmed?

It depends on language on which permission was written. You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to make review move faster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

ichiesta di spiegazione

Io non conosco bene la lingua inglese, tuttavia sono un assiduo collaboratore. Non ho capito che cosa devo fare: dovreste essere molto espliciti. Se mi dicte chiaramente come devo procedure io lo faro.--37.182.65.238 14:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( Since you left anonymous comment, I could not find out which problem did you mean. Please specify specific file or account in question. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Deleted pictures from the page "Phare des Pâquis"

Hello On the 8th of September you've deleted two pictures I've uploaded on Wikimedia and published on the french Wikipedia page "Phare des Pâquis".

- File:François Marc Delrieu, gardien du phare et responsable de l'octroi.jpg - File:Phare de 1894.jpg

Those two pictures are not under copyright as they are part of my family private collection. By the way, those pictures are also more than 100 years old so I suppose they aren't under copyright anymore (at least for the Swiss law - the country where I live).

Could you please publish again those two deleted pictures or let me publish them again.

Thank you

Eric Court — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric court (talk • contribs) 09:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

At least these photos are not your own work. If you think that they are in public domain, you should use relevant license tag and provide source information which will support public domain claim. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. I restored files, but you need to fix their descriptions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the message

Hello EugeneZelenko

Thanks for your message about my first upload. I want to let you know that I appreciate it, and that I'll take all of that on board in future uploads. If I make any mistakes or breach copyright etc, it will all be in good faith as I am keen to be a productive and positive user. Thanks! Heffloaf (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

No, it was not about copyrights, but about helping others to find you files. See also Commons:Categories. Thank you for sharing architecture related photos! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Deleted Photos

Hello Eugene, On the 18th of September you've deleted 5 pictures I've uploaded on Wikimedia and published on the Danish Wikipedia page. The new subject is "Søvnbriller" in English it is "Blue-Blocking Sleep Glasses" or "Blue-Blocking Sleep Googles". Those 5 pictures are not under copyright as they are part of my commercial pictures. I have paid a photographer to take the photoshoots and the models for their effort. The document Transmittance measurement is a test I have ordered at the Danish Technical Institute and it is conducted by Carsten Dam Hansen. I have paid for this test and I have all the rights for this too. Could you please publish the deleted pictures again. Thank you Best regards Henrik Soerensen melatoninexp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melatoninexp (talk • contribs) 08:06, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Files were only nominated for deletion. Please send copyrights ownership confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Please leave notice about your actions on deletion request page.

I think will be good idea to replace document with wiki-text table and MediaWiki graph or SVG chart.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Просьба восстановить файлы

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko! В OTRS поступило разрешение от автора фотографий File:На съёмках фильма «Степанова памятка» режиссер Константин Ершов и актер Геннадий Егоров.jpg, File:На съёмочной площадке «Маршал Революции» Геннадий Егоров в роли Фрунзе, Юрий Соловьев в роли Гусева.jpg, File:На съёмочной площадке фильма «Родное дело». В роли Лены актриса Антонина Лефтий, в роли Ивана Шальнева актёр Геннадий Егоров.jpg, File:На съемочной площадке фильма Родное дело.jpg, которые ранее были удалены в связи с нарушением авторских прав. Не могли бы Вы восстановить данные файлы, а я далее оформлю. Заранее огромное спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 09:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

У меня нет доступа к OTRS, чтобы проверить разрешение. Вам надо оставить запрос на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

У меня есть доступ, я уже получил разрешение, Ticket#2016091510020467, мне необходимо только проставить это разрешение на восстановленных файлах. Просто, больше я не знаю активных русскоязычных администраторов на данный момент, поэтому к Вам и обратился. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 14:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

• Огромнейшее спасибо!!! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 15:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

full beginner in wiki contributor world, my project is compromised

Dear Eugene, i'm Franco-Czech leaving in India and i'm feel very alone in front of wiki parameters ... i'm trying to save the last french school in Chennai, this school is fabulous but so small that it risks to disappear if we d'ont communicate about it. I work with the director of this school, and have the officials files (logo, booklet, my pic of the vue of the school...) but when i transferred the files to wiki media i was lost in the licences and "html codes" parameters ... all my files will be refused if i d'ont select the correct licence.

Please Should you help me in this action ?

Other question, this french school have already a wiki page in english by an other contributor in India because it's linked with the indian part of the school : Sishya School in Chennai Can i complete this page and add the french page like being the same ? it will be logic that my contribution is in the initial content.

If my english is too bad, you should help me to find a french wiki tutor ;o)

Many many thanks for your precius help,

Verunka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verunka Ondrackova (talk • contribs) 06:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Please ask school officials to send permission for logo and booklet to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and files undeletion.

Please re-upload your own picture in full resolution with EXIF to proof authorship.

Sure, you could create/translate article in French Wikipedia. Link to it should be added to Wikidata item about school.

I think Yann will be most helpful, since he has similar background as you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Eugene. I let a word in French on Verunka's talk page. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Yhoc logo.jpg

This image you deleted has been recreated.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing attention! I deleted it again and warned user. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение о возможном удалении File:Stupin A D.jpg

Добрый день, Евгений!

А. Д. Ступин - мой прапрадед. Фотография взята из семейного архива. Вероятнее всего это единственная сохранившаяся фотография А. Д. Ступина. Eraevsky (talk) 17:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Это было опубликовано до революции? Тогда это {{PD-RusEmpire}}, но надо указать источник. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Безусловно до революции. Но это фотография из нашего семейного архива. Можно ли указать такой источник? Eraevsky (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Фотография явно где-то была опубликована, хотя и семейный архив сойдёт. Нужна примерная дата создания. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение о возможном удалении File:Кубрякова.jpg и File:Kubrjakova E S.jpg

Елена Самойловна Кубрякова (умерла 27 июня 2011) была близким другом нашей семьи. Фотография сделана мной в Ленинграде в начале 60-х годов. Eraevsky (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Думаю, стоит подтвердить авторство через Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение о возможном удалении File:Memorial board of Lev Pontriagin.jpg

Добрый день, Евгений!

Фотография памятной доски Понтрягина, установленная на здании ВМК МГУ, сделана мной в прошедшие выходные с целю размещения на странице ВМК МГУ. Eraevsky (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Смотрите w:ru:Свобода панорамы. То же справедливо для фотографий иных произведений, не перешедших в общественное достояние. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Вы считаете, что памятные доски относятся к скульптурам? Я конечно менее опытен. Видимо вам виднее. Eraevsky (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Памятные доски нетривиально дизайна являются произведениями искусства. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение о возможном удалении File:Ilja-Muromec pamiatnik 2015-05-19+.jpg

Добрый день, Евгений!

Фотография памятника Илье Муромцу была сделана мной во время поездки в Муром на майские праздники 2015 года и была размещена на странице Википедии в отклик на баннер "Вики любит памятники: Сфотографируй памятник, помоги Википедии и выиграй!" Пришлось слегка повернуть и обрезать, чтобы убрать перекос. Eraevsky (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Получается, что исходя из w:ru:Свобода панорамы призыв на баннере Википедии для России невыполним? Я правильно понял? Eraevsky (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Учитывая, что памятник установлен в парке Мурома. Возможно это можно отнести к садово-парковому? Eraevsky (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Это зависит от предмета изображения. Здания недавно снимать разрешили. Можно снимать памятники, перешедшие в общественное достояние (> 70 лет со дня смерти скульптора).

Нет. На этих снимках памятник - главный предмет изображения.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение о возможном удалении File:Памятник на могиле Матвея Дубровина.png

Добрый день, Евгений!

Снимок надгробия М. Г. Дубровину сделан мной в Санкт-Петербурге в середине августа с.г. перед отправкой памятника на реставрацию. Eraevsky (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение о возможном удалении File:Dubrovin pedagog.jpg

Добрый день, Евгений!

Фотография Матвея Дубровина (умер 22 октября 1974) взята из архивов ТЮТа с согласия Евгения Сазонова - художественного руководителя театра в настоящее время. Eraevsky (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Также фотография опубликована в Педагогическом журнале «Ракурс» № 25 «Театр юношеского творчества», СПб.: ГОУ «СПбГДТЮ» 2006. — 76 с. — ISBN 5-88494-061-0 Eraevsky (talk) 04:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Обладатель афторских прав (фотограф? наследник(и)? заказчик?) должен послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). То же для иных фотографий, сделанными другими людьми. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо за разьяснение. Я буду делать это в первый раз. Поэтому попрошу некоторых разъяснений. Достаточно ли будет письма в электронном виде от дочки Дубровина. В какой адрес и в каком виде это должно быть отправлено? Есть ли возможность использования до этого ограниченной лицензии изображения как на умершего человека. Такие случаи я встречал в Википедии. Eraevsky (talk) 16:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Письма по электронной почте достаточно. Адрес и образец смотрите на Commons:OTRS/ru.

Что Вы имели ввиду под ограниченной лицензии как на умершего человека? Если несвободные изображения, то их надо загружать локально в русскую Википедию.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko спасибо за разъяснение. Файл, как несвободное изображение загружен. Я просто недостаточно опытен. Извините. Eraevsky (talk) 21:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Devil May Cry logos deleted

Hi, I would like to know why the Devil May Cry logos have been deleted. There are a lot of games logos, why the ones I uploaded have been cancelled? Must I do something else before/after the upload? Thank you.

P.S: sorry for my english and sorry for the question I Made (probably stupid, but I'm new and I don't know very well how the website works). AndreaOrfeus (talk) 21:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

These logos are of not-trivial design. You could upload such files into projects which allow non-free content, like English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

So there's a way to upload them again? What must I do precisely? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreaOrfeus (talk • contribs) 15:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

As I wrote, you could upload such logos locally into projects which allow them. See w:en:Wikipedia:Non-free content as example. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I'll see what I can do. Thank you, sorry for the stupid questions but I repeat, I'm new and I don't know exactly what I must and what must not do.

Please don't worry! I was newbie here too :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

y?

why Missing permission?

File:University Sergio Arboleda logo.svg This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD#Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.--EEIM (talk) 00:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Design doesn't seem to be trivial, even if lines were used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение о возможном удалении File:Dvorec pionerov.jpg

Добрый день, Евгений!

Фотография Дворца пионеров взята из архивов ТЮТа и отсканирована мной с согласия Евгения Сазонова - художественного руководителя театра. Eraevsky (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Также фотография опубликована в Педагогическом журнале «Ракурс» № 25 «Театр юношеского творчества», СПб.: ГОУ «СПбГДТЮ» 2006. — 76 с. — ISBN 5-88494-061-0 Eraevsky (talk) 04:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Attribution for File: The Geelong College, 2005

Dear EugeneZelenko,

Thank you for your query regarding the uploaded photo mentioned above. I appreciate all comments regarding attribution as I am new to this website (and the concept of Creative Commons licences). I can confirm now that the image can be found on an website that has an explicit Creative Commons Share-Alike 2.0 licence on it (http://mapio.net/pic/p-9051009/). Sorry for the lack of licencing information.

Kind Regards,

Andrew Duan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Duan (talk • contribs) 08:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

I see Creative Commons Share-Alike 2.0 on map taken from OpenStreetMap, but not for photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks - I should be more careful in the future! I have removed this image and have replaced it with another image that is now of the College logo. The link to it is here http://logos.wikia.com/wiki/File:Geelong-college-logo-1.png and the website's licencing information is here http://www.wikia.com/Licensing (a link to it is on the bottom of the first webpage in this comment).--Andrew Duan

Logo has similar problem. Wikia license is about text created by contributors. Media licenses may vary and it's hard to tell how well policies are followed. At least I saw many comics transferred from Wikia to Commons without any license statements. Anyway, Wikia is not primary source of college logo. You should look for license of college site. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Stop deleting free files!

Just stop. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.187.112.216 (talk) 22:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Could you please refer to particular problem? If not, both of us should wait until all Commons users will follows Commons policies. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Kishony_lab-_The_Evolution_of_Bacteria_on_a_“Mega-Plate”_Petri_Dish.webm

Hi,

For File:Kishony_lab-_The_Evolution_of_Bacteria_on_a_“Mega-Plate”_Petri_Dish.webm, the user:Rkishony is the copyright holder - R. Kishony. Is it still in need of a formal copyright release email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org?

Thanks, T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 04:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

I think authorship/permission confirmation via OTRS will be reasonable. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

hijopu....ta

Por que dices que el archivo *.SVG creado por mi persona tiene derechos de autor, si enteramente es producto de mi creatividad e imaginacion!, motherfu****, let me share my creations! --DarwinJimyFloresQuispe 20:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Portuguese :-( Yoiu need to ask sport club officials to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tramea onusta-Male-2.jpg

And also:

• File:Tramea onusta-Male-1.jpg
• File:USA-San Jose-1001 South Seventh Street-2.jpg
• File:Podstakannik and glass of tea.jpg
• File:Acmaeodera hepburnii-1.jpg
• File:Scaeva pyrastri-Female-3.jpg
• File:Scaeva pyrastri-Female-2.jpg
• File:Euphydryas chalcedona chalcedona-Male-7.jpg
• File:Euphydryas chalcedona chalcedona-Male-6.jpg
• File:Mythimna unipuncta-1.jpg
• File:RSFSR-1919-Banknote-3-Reverse.png
• File:Russian Empire-1909-Banknote-5-УА Series-Shipov-Gr. Ivanov-Reverse.png

Yours sincerely, Dajimy (talk) 19:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

নিজের ছবি

এটা আমার নিজের ছবি ৷ — Preceding unsigned comment added by De Mazid Islam (talk • contribs) 17:23, 08 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know any language of India :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

De mazid islam 1. Its my photoDe Mazid Islam (talk) 11:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests / TomekD pl

Hi, EugeneZelenko,

Files:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1952_Poznan_1_maja_Swiety_Marcin_Armii_Czerwonej_4.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1952_Poznan_1_maja_Swiety_Marcin_Armii_Czerwonej_3.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1952_Poznan_1_maja_Towarowa_Swiety_Marcin_Armii_Czerwonej_2.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1952_Poznan_1_maja_ul_Swiety_Marcin_wtedy_Armii_Czerwonej_1.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1945_Poznan_gimnazjum_Jana_Kantego_zniszczona_sala_gimnastyczna_1.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1945_Poznan_gimnazjum_Jana_Kantego_zniszczona_sala_gimnastyczna_2.jpg

I got your message, little is unclear what was wrong with my photos:
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

As I wrote I am in full possession of the copyright to these pictures:
"All uploaded photos were taken by my father Włodzimierz Doliński. My father is dead and all copyrights to these pictures are mine."

Besides, according to Polish law images older than 50 years are free.
The exception is the copyright notice if the pictures were published earlier - more specifically before year 1994. These pictures were never published before.

I made some changes in summary description (Source, Author).

Can you check is it now ok or not ?

--TomekD pl (talk) 20:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Since these photos were not published, term of copyrights protection should be counted since date of your father death.

Are you only heir to your father? If not, other heir(s) should give permission via Commons:OTRS.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I am the only heir of my father. As I wrote previously - all rights to the property after my father (including photographs) are mine.

I checked again polish copyright law and my previous informations are not really accurate. This is more complicated than I thought. I'm not a lawyer, my father was a lawyer ...

Is the problem of these images can be treated as solved ? I have more several interesting (I hope), historical photos taken by my father that I want saved them from disappearance.
--TomekD pl (talk) 17:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I think best way to solve this will be to send copyright ownership confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion notice for Rp2006 files

Ref: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rp2006

Researched this and think I see why this was seen as a possible problem. Is this is an infringement issue regarding photos of sculptures (a Fair Use question)?

This may be relevant:

"The fair use exception to the copyright law allows for use of a photograph of an artwork for educational, critical, scholarly, satirical, or newsworthy purposes—protecting schools and publications from infringement claims, for instance—and also requires a degree of 'economic injury' to the copyright holder."(http://www.sculpture.org/documents/scmag05/may_05/webspecs/grant.shtml)

As well as this (from http://photosecrets.com/can-i-use-this-photo), which is an excerpt of the applicable law as quoted there, 17 U.S.C. § 107:

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

• 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
• 2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
• 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
• 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Regarding 1: Both the park where the sculptures are and WikiMedia are "nonprofit & educational" in nature, so I do not see a problem.

Regarding 3: Only one view is shown of each sculpture so the "amount and substantiality" is small.

Regarding 4: No one seeing a photo of a sculpture who could buy a copy of the sculpture will be dissuaded from such a purchase due to the image in a photo.

And by the way: File:A resident peacock 6-22-2014.jpg is a photo of an actual wild animal! Rp2006 (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Sculptures are main subject of your photos. See Commons:Freedom of panorama#United_States. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Просьба восстановить файлы

Здравствуйте, EugeneZelenko! Ещё раз обращаюсь к Вам с просьбой. Мною были вынесены на удаления файлы, загруженные участницей EAGuseva, как нарушающие авторские права. Администратор INeverCry их удалил. А сейчас пришло разрешение в OTRS от наследников Михаила, Гелия и Киры Коржевых, Ticket#2016093010020885. Не могли бы вы восстановить файлы со страницы обсуждения EAGuseva https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EAGuseva, за исключением фотографий с изображением художников, те только их работы. Разрешения я проставлю. Заранее огромное спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 17:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Сделано. Кстати, "Поднимающего знамя" видел в какой-то книге в школьные годы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Огромное спасибо за проделанную работу, я всё оформил. Боюсь, что мне придётся к Вам периодически обращаться с просьбами, получается, что Вы самый активный русскоговорящий админ в данное время. Ещё раз, огромное спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 07:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Абсолютно не за что! Был рад помочь. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

In response to SVG template

(Re: User talk:Skylord a52#SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics))

I know that that image would work better as an SVG, but I couldn't find an SVG version and I have no way of making one, unfortunately. I would appreciate it if you or somebody else could convert it. Skylord a52 (talk) 21:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop will be best place to find help. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

?

why u keep deleting things?? I can't see your "help" in that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andvip (talk • contribs) 22:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Licensing carefully to understand reasons for deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

বানিয়েছি

আল্লাহর নাম দিয়ে বানানো ছবিটি ৷ ফিরিয়ে দেওয়ার আবেদন জানাচ্ছি ৷ কারণ ছবিটি কপি করে বানায়নি ওটা আমার নিজের বানানো ৷ — Preceding unsigned comment added by De Mazid Islam (talk • contribs) 14:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Indian languages :-( Please at least mention file name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Natalia au Steinway.jpg

File:Natalia au Steinway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eugene, Your deletion request, with the comment "unlikely to be won work; can be found on other websites" is INCORRECT. be advised that I am the photographer who owns the copyright to the photo you have marked for deletion. It is the cover photograph that was used on her Franz Schubert CD, which I also executive produced. The photo was taken by me at my studio in New York City in October 2014, and it is my piano in the photograph.

As it was also used as the CD album cover, it is not surprising that it appears on other websites. Thank you for including the link with your report. I will be taking legal action against pbs for unauthorized use.

In the meantime, I suggest you redact your deletion request. It is wholly without merit.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profmikep (talk • contribs) 15:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Please send authorship and copyrights ownership confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

@Profmikep: Also, it is not "pbs". The url "pbs.twimg" is an image-hosting url of Twitter and the image is there because Natalia Sitolenko has this photograph on her Twitter account. If you want to take action against someone, it would be against Natalia. Probably not exactly a good idea if you are the executive producer of her album. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Fact, that this photo is available somewhere else, is enough to justify clarification of copyrights status. See Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

I say thank so much for add this file to deleting request. Its original work, its incorrect your request but, anyway, delete this please and the whole files as well; apparently you are supporting freedom but you suggest delete original files... XOXO FridaOlvera (talk) 19:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

See Commons:Currency to understand problems with banknotes and coins images.

Other files didn't have EXIF and could be found on other web sites. You could upload files in original resolutions with EXIF to proof your authorship.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Чорторийська западина Урочище Ведмеже.jpg and File:Fields of meteorite craters "Levada", Ivanhorod - Chortoryia.jpg

Hi!

I am a novice on the resource and yet well get confused in writing a valid tags in image licensing.
Screenshots show marked the removal of satellite data that are freely distributed.
Web applications also provide information as it is, and demonstrate the capabilities of cloud computing to commercial products, but they are only demonstrations brand in the public domain.
That is, I did not take the code, and have not used the trademark of a commercial product, but the mention of it I placed.
As I have mentioned and the source of satellite images - is freely distributed big data project of civil remote sensing of the Earth's surface.

I gave the answers on pages discuss their images.
I allow to correct any information from the description to the images, as yet poorly guided, what do you need to write, and it is not necessary.

Best regards

--Латуха Валерій 22:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Latuha1 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your images are based on others works. See Commons:Derivative works. Please provide license for original works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

удаление видео

Добрый день, я новичок на проекте, не совсем еще освоился тут, подскажите я добавил видео, опубликованное мной же на сайте ютуб, это мое видео, т.е. я являюсь автором. На ютубе оно залито под стандартной лицензией, что позволяет его использовать другим людям. Могу ли я его здесь разместить? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fedorovnikolay (talk • contribs) 09:11, 01 November 2016 (UTC)

Ваши видео выглядят как официальные, но, думаю, что Вы можете подтвердить авторство и правообладание через Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Помощь с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением файлов Вы можете получить на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

My Photos are up for deletion request

Hi EugeneZelenko,

Where do I go to discuss my photos not being taken down, and what goes into the decision to take photos down?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmarrio10 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 03 November 2016 (UTC)

I think you need to confirm authorship/copyrights ownership via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

TST Logo

Hi EugeneZelenko,

I am a bit disappointed that you did simply deleted the TST Logo without reading my question on the talk page. How can I recreate this page for referencing the logo in the German Wikipedia?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TSTredlogo.jpg

Kind regards --Gurulupin (talk) 14:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

This logo was uploaded to English Wikipedia, because it allows non-free files. Commons doesn't allow this. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

so can I upload it to German Wikipedia then? I tried, but was redirected here. --Gurulupin (talk) 17:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

As far as I know, German Wikipedia doesn't allow non-free files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Tape_(JavaScript_testing_framework)_Logo.svg

I have added a link to the lincense file in the same directory under "permission", and also sent a copy of the author's email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org – Yves

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Eeben Barlow, and Hubert-Erwin Meierdress images

Hi Eugene, the picture of Eeben Barlow is the one he personally uses on all common media, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. I do not know who the author, date, place, and it was so far impossible to find out. I wrote on his blog regarding but there was no reply. One entry in his blog said that it was taken in 2011. The one of Hubert-Erwin Meierdress is from the common German National Archives, with no referral to author, date and place taken, either. This one is for common use as everything published from that archive is. Thank you. --Nanorsuaq (talk) 15:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Fact? that image used on Internet, doesn't necessarily means that it freely licensed. Old photos may be in public domain, but source information is needed. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarifying info. --Nanorsuaq (talk) 03:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Good day Mr. Zelenko,

I have been tasked by my father to update his wiki-page ("Erneido A. Oliva"). He asked me to upload a photo taken of him in his professional environment. I created the digital file of the unpublished photo, and this photo has never appeared on any website. This photo was selected from our family albums. But I was not the photographer. From Wikipedia's point of view, am I considered the greator of the digital file, and thus the copyright holder? I believe I understand why you took down the original photo as I inadvertently deleted the rationale for permission. I have re-uploaded the image you took based on the following reason: "I created the file myself. it hasn't been previously published, and I am the sole owner of its copyright." Just follow the instructions found on the Commons:Upload page, unless the image/ file is of outstanding or professional quality or there is some other reason your authorship may be doubted. If this is not the proper way to resolve this situation, please advise on the proper method.

Antonio E. Oliva — Preceding unsigned comment added by AEOliva (talk • contribs) 02:13, 05 November 2016 (UTC)

Only photographer or copyrights owner could determine copyrights status. You need to find out how is this person and ask him/her to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Unión del Fútbol del Interior

Porqué se borró este archivo UFI.png del artículo Unión del Fútbol del Interior, siendo que la página fuente dice "Este documento pertenece al Archivo FUTPARAGUAY, y su copia total o parcial es autorizada a toda organización o persona que brinde a sus autores un reconocimiento adecuado." http://www.futparaguay.com/2000/01/index.html Me pueden dar una explicación? O se borra sin entender el idioma castellano?. Robslpy (talk) 14:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( This logo belong to particular sport club and web site only use it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

И ещё раз просьба восстановить файлы

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko! Ещё раз, имею наглость, обратиться к Вам с просьбой восстановить удалённые файлы, так как пришло разрешение в OTRS от режиссёра фильма, в котором он подтверждает, что является обладателем всех авторских прав на эти авторские работы. Заранее огромное спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 14:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Сделано. Там ещё стоит лишние категории поубирать. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо огромное! Категории поправил. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Sinterklaas Zwarte Piet.jpg

Hi, the copyright situation of this file was reviewed by MoiraMoira, see here. Although she does not have a reviewer bit here, she is a very experienced and trusted user. Jcb (talk) 16:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

It's good idea to add reviewed tag for such images. Page didn't opened for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Foto nella pagina di Basciano

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Forestalia_2 Caro EugeneZelenko tutte le immagini che ho caricato sulla pagina di wikipedia di Basciano SONO MIE OPERE (fatte tramite il mio smartphone). La prego di eliminare l'annuncio di avviso cancellazione. Tutte le foto sono opera mia! Prego vivamente di non eliminarle! All other photos are my own work! Please do not delete!. Thank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forestalia 2 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 07 November 2016 (UTC)

Could I get an answer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forestalia 2 (talk • contribs) 09:49, 08 November 2016 (UTC)

--Forestalia 2 (talk) 09:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Forestalia 2

---Forestalia 2 (talk) 09:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Forestalia 7-11-2016

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

how do you insert EXIF? I took the pictures with your smartphone --Forestalia 2 (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Forestalia 2

Smartphone (or any other digital camers) should add EXIF during shooting. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

I proceeded to upload photos with EXIF data. Please delete the cancellation notice. --Forestalia 2 (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Forestalia 2

Sorry, but you faked EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

I do not know what to say. I live in Basciano, I have no reason not to use my photos --Forestalia 2 (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Forestalia 2

If you are author of photos, you should be able to provide originals without resorting to fake EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Просьба восстановить файлы

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko! Извините наглеца за очередную просьбу. В OTRS опять пришло письмо с разрешением от художницы и мастера песочной анимации Ксении Симоновой с разрешением опубликовать её работы под свободными лицензиями (Ticket#2016102610014361), которые были загружены участницей Татьяна Ар, и потом удалены в виду отсутствия разрешения от правообладателя. Список удалённых файлов здесь. Но есть одно "НО": разрешение распространяется только на файлы с работами Ксении Симоновой, лицензионный статус файлов, где изображена сама художница неясен, по ним вопрос пока уточняется. Заранее огромное спасибо! И простите, ещё раз. за очередное беспокойство! С огромным уважением, Олег.

Не вижу никакой наглости :-) Я восстановил некоторые файлы, но в основном ориентировался по названиям, т. к. просмотр удалённых файлов - дело муторное :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо огромное! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 02:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Sinterklaas Zwarte Piet.jpg, File:Twee Zwarte Pieten.jpg and File:Zwarte Piet.jpg

Could you please remove the {{No permission since}} tag from these files? Them has been already nominated for deletion and resolved as Kept. (File:Zwarte Piet.jpg has been restored after discussion). --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Link provided in description require login. If trusted user reviewed permission, relevant review template should be added to description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Stemma Eparchia Piana degli Albanesi.jpg

Spero di aver fatto bene.--Gspata (talk) 1:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry,, I don't know Italian :-( It's definitely not your own work. You need to provide source/date of creation information to determine copyrights status. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Suppression Commons User Damsb

Bonjour EugeneZelenko,

Je vous informe que l'autorisation pour l'ensemble des liens ci dessous a été envoyé à l'adresse 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org'

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Damsb?markasread=3925120#File_tagging_File:DombeyaFB.pdf

File:DombeyaFB.pdf. File:MouvFB.png File:Dombeya Affiche 2016.jpg File:Dombeya Affiche 2015.jpg File:Hans Nayna LP.jpg

Merci beaucoup à vous.

Très bonne journée. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damsb (talk • contribs) 06:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Source?

Hi. You have tagged this file as no source. But I guess the source is its creator user:کامران آزاد. And it has been published by CC4.0 license. What kind of source must be added to? Mahdy Saffar (talk) 17:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

This video is Commons:Derivative works from map. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Upload Permission

I am wondering if this [2] is okay to upload. Thank you.... CollegeRivalry (talk) 10 November 2016 (UTC)

No. It explicitly says: All rights reserved. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Stemma Eparchia Piana degli Albanesi.jpg

Ciao! I did well? There are still problems for the license? Thank you?--Gspata (talk) 23:14, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Logo is not photograph. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Exclusão Arbitraria de Ficheiro

@EugeneZelenko: Por que o ficheiro File:Escudo Campinas FC.png foi excluído sem consentimento geral (Commons:Deletion requests)? Quais argumentos foram usados? Essa atitude foi totalmente arbitraria! Por que o senhor também não aproveita seu status para excluir ficheiros como File:Guarani FC (E) - SP.svg, File:Escudo Oficial Ponte Preta.png, File:Palmeiras logo.svg? Qual a diferente desses ficheiros e do meu? Ele estava usando as mesmas predefinições de permissão desses escudos usados na Wikimedia Commons!

OBSERVAÇÃO: já havia side definido que não deveria ser excluído com base aqui Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Association football logos of São Paulo!

Raphael Figueira (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Answered on File talk:Escudo Campinas FC.png. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Mendham Graduation 2015.jpg‬

Dear Eugene Zelenko,

Thank you about your inquiry about the photo I edited on West Morris Mendham High School's page. The photo is labeled: "Mendham Graduation 2015." You messaged stating it might by a copyright issue, but this is my photo. Perhaps it is a small file because I transferred the photo from my camera onto my cell phone, and I uploaded the photo from my cellular device. Please let me know.

Sincerely, Emma Spoldi

You could upload photo in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Deleted photo

Good morning! I'm sorry for this late reply. I'm new to Wikipedia and didn't know how to communicate properly.

Wonder why my contribution for Commons (Elena Gallego Andrada) has been deleted. Could you give me a hint so I can be careful next time?

Regards SaraGuevara (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

You could upload photo in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

EXIF details

Thanks for your answer. Let me ask something: EXIF normally is shown by Flickr (I'm a Flickr user @Soros004). Do I have to upload pics to Flickr and then copy the EXIF? What about pics taken with cellphones or previously delete pics from phone that remain in the cloud? I'm afraid I won't go to Tokyo again soon to take a pic of Dr Gallego. Sorry for my ignorance in these matters.

Is it possible to answer your message from the body of it? I mean it feels strange to write in the board to continue the thread.

Regards, SaraGuevara (talk) 15:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

EXIF should remain in original file. It also shown by MediaWiki (software behind Commons). If cloud service doesn't modify files, EXIF should remain.

Sorry, I didn't understand last part. It's fine to use user talk pages for questions, but it's better to use deletion request page for related discussion.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

PeterWhiteLogo.png possible copyright violation

I added the image PeterWhiteLogo.png to the page for Peter White Public Library as an agent of the institution. Did I do something wrong in assigning the rights to the image?

Bruce MacDonald Peter White Public Library Marquette, Michigan

Logo is complex enough to be copyrighted. You could upload such logos on projects which allow non-free content, like English Wikipedia.

Alternatively you could try to get permission from library officials for Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and file undeletion.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Seafood Watch Logo

I am trying to add a logo to the Infobox for the nonprofit, Seafood Watch. It was deleted. The logo is available from the press room on the company website: https://newsroom.montereybayaquarium.org/file?fid=543f6c4ef6091d258900002c

I can also get express permission from the organization if that is needed.

The relevant page is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seafood_Watch

What is the best way to proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3CrossPattern (talk • contribs) 16:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3CrossPattern (talk • contribs) 16:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

From web page: Content for news-related, non-commercial use, but not otherwise reproduce, modify or in any way commercially exploit the Content. It's definitely not compatible with Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Laocoon Anatomical.jpg

I sent authorization as you requested yet you still deleted it. I am the author. I drew the art. It is an original drawing created by me and owned by me. I granted permission.

Sincerely, Neal Owen Lonoaia Betts --Neal Betts (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC) --Neal Betts (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and file undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Muscicapa sodhii

You have tagged the image I uploaded Muscicapa sodhii for deletion, stating: "This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license." The image is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 as explicitly declared on the cited page (i.e. Copyright: © 2014 Harris et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.). Kindly check the matter before deleting. Chhandama (talk) 02:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Image credits are attributed to Teo Nam Siang, but he/she is not mentioned as article author. Should be taken from other place. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:M1_z_celownikiem_noktowizyjnym.jpg

Hi, you may wish to know that after the comment of @Geagea: I have nominated the other 427 files for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/2016/11/17. Somebody has already robotically added a mistaken keep vote to all of them, so I don't know what will happen. These days some admins have gone crazy and will just press the keep button because they see a keep vote, without even reading the DR. Jcb (talk) 03:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

It would be better to make single nomination to avoid this problem. But it was beyond my knowledge of automated tools :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

For me as well, I would also have prefered a mass DR. But Fae came with a useful suggestion for future cases, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parabellum M948 1884.jpg. Jcb (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

It's simple. You add category like "files from XYZ" to all the files. And then all the files in the same category can be nominated easily. -- Geagea (talk) 18:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

I will do that from now on for such cases. Jcb (talk) 18:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for hint! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

OpenStreetMap usage

Hi Eugene,

Please verify that I did everything correctly with this image: File:Map of Protection Island (Washington State).png. If this is an appropriate source of CC-licensed images, I'll be uploading more. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 16:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, OpenStreetMap is appropriate source, but please note that their license is {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}, not {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Eugene, I made the correction. Do you know why the upload wizard wouldn't let you choose CC 2.0? (It starts with 2.5 and goes up to 4.0). 凰兰时罗 (talk) 19:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I never used upload wizard (I'll keep my opinion within myself :-) I use basic upload form, with allows to enter arbitrary license when license not selected. It has has {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} for Flickr, but adds related review template,--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Improperly deleted files

Hello, Eugene, I can not understand why had you deleted my two files. You wrote to me: 

"Na descrição do ficheiro que colocou na Wikimedia Commons, File:Voos internacionais de CNF em 11-2016.gif, falta informação sobre a origem do ficheiro ou sobre quem o criou. Ela é necessária para verificar o estado dos direitos de autor. Edite a descrição do ficheiro e adicione a informação em falta, ou o ficheiro poderá ser eliminado.

Se é o criador do conteúdo, coloque Own work como fonte. Se não colocou uma predefinição de licenciamento, tem de colocá-la. Pode usar, por exemplo,

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:

You may select the license of your choice.

ou

para licenciar certos direitos da sua obra. [...]".

But all the files involved where from my own authorship, and so I answered to you: 

"Dear Eugene, I'm the very own author of the three files, and the field "|source=Obra do próprio" was already ok in all of them. Is there still any irregularity with the files? Best regards,

ArthurBaz"

with no response. Anyways, I did the change you asked me to, although there was nothing to change because they were already with the correct license. Is there still anything missing? Please let me now. Thank you, Arthur — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArthurBaz (talk • contribs) 23:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Both of your images were based on maps. What is source and license for original images? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Another licensing question

Hi Eugene, and if it's not too much trouble, could you look at this image? Do I understand correctly that it's in public domain? (I'm reading COM:L: "for works first published 1978 or later: until 70 years after the author's death." This image was stored in the library and first published on UW website. There is no publication date, but it obviously happened after 1978, and per description below, the author died in 1941.) Do I read the rules correctly? 凰兰时罗 (talk) 04:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

I think it should be in public domain. Even if photo was not published before 1923, author died more then 70 years ago. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory#United_States. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Cambridge Audio images and white paper.pdf

Hello Eugene, All of these images were supplied directly from Cambridge Audio. They were all created by Cambridge Audio or owned by the company but all are copyright free and available via there press office. What do I need to do to prove this?

Thank youAndburslem (talk) 18:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC) Andburslem (talk) 18:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Andburslem

In such cases you should provide link to copyrights statement in permission field of file descriptions. And if company created something, these could not be your own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Pictures related to shadychiri

I saw you remove many of my images some from my blog and some from my phone camera. I had exclusive rights to these an had granted rights uner creative commons but I no longer have some of them in my SD so if you can undelete ill be grateful. it would have been more reasonable to start a talk page over it and allow me to list my rights over them than just delete them as if i was a idiot who just okayed every process in the upload stream. VERY DISAPPOINTED.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadychiri (talk • contribs) 21:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Best way to proof your authorship is uploading photos in original resolution with EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Comte de Vaublanc.JPG

I have found this drawing in the archives of my family . I have taken a picture of it. I don't know the author of this drawing. It's written below Vienot-Vaublanc so it's the count of Vaublanc. He is died in 1845. So the picture is in the public domain. Aymeric78 (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

I asked you to clarify source/license for File:Charles-François de Buttet.png, File:Canon-Obusier (2).pdf and File:Roger Viennot de Vaublanc.jpg. These images are definitely not your own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour EugèneZelenco (section)

Je suis l'auteur de la reproduction du Tableau de Charles-François de Buttet et des photos du prototype de canon de son invention. Je suis propriétaire du tableau qui est celui de mon ancêtre et aussi des photos. Aymeric a d'ailleurs répondu aux questions du formulaire. Cordialement. Entremont (talk) 08:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't Know French :-( Owning book or painting doesn't make you and author. This why is important to specify original author or at least date of publication/creation and country of origin if author is unknown. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

picture related to प्रतिसर्गपर्व

This picture has been taken from a classical book published more than 150 years ago. Therefore it does not have any copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puranastudy (talk • contribs) 21:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

It's not your own work. You need to provide original author or at least date of publication/creation and country of origin if author is unknown. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

No: Your explanation is not correct: this picture is my property: it is the picture of my ancestor . Please, would you like protect my article and this photo in the article wikipédia which was created by me. Sincerly. Entremont (talk) 10:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Answered above. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pekar.png

I'm guessing from the uploader's response that he's legit, really took the picture over 50 years ago, and isn't very Internet-savvy, let alone wiki-savvy. Do you think you could take on walking him through what we need with OTRS, or would you like me to take this on? - Jmabel ! talk 01:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I think OTRS will be good solution, since this photo were donated to other place too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Right, but what I'm asking is whether you can guide him through this, or if I should. Clearly someone who will need some help. Remember, he's got to be about 80 years old, not someone who grew up with the Internet. - Jmabel ! talk 18:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I'll try to follow this case. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion Request

You listed my work at Commons Deletion, so, why? it's my design, It's not for commercial use. I made it just for a work for my design university. I need this here because a requiriment of the university. I put it on the description...

Ginés Ruiz Amorós https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ruiz_amoros_gines_goldenpillow.pdf

Your work looks like advertisement. Sure, it's legitimate task if you study marketing, but does it have any educational value? Please read Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Is NOT an advertisement. The company Golden Pillow is FAKE, it does not exist. And of course it has an educational value, my college only wants to see how I can make a design for an HYPOTHETIC company called Golden Pillow. Also, the pictures and texts I use has the lisence CC0 1.0 Universal. (Ginés Ruiz Amorós)

It doesn't matter if company is real or fictional. Matter is what is educational value of this file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes it has. The education value is that I show people (my professor) how an advertisemen as to be. --Ginés Ruiz Amorós

You need to understand difference between university assignment and WMF projects. Not every university assignment fit into WMF project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bandeira de Itaporanga (Paraíba).svg

Hi!

I've found a CorelDRAW version of the flag of Paraíba's Itaporanga city, Brazil here http://itaporangapb.blogspot.com.br/2014/07/simbolos-oficiais-o-escudo-e-bandeira.html, however there is no copyright notice. I fixed the flag to fit the 7:10 standard, converted the file to SVG format, and then uploaded it here.

I've already sent an email to the blogger asking permission to use the file, but I'm still waiting a reply. If I don't get any response, I'll try to recreate it from scratch.

I'm sorry the mess about that. Alan Moraes (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

You need to find out copyrights status of municipal symbols in Brazil, because blogger/you are not authors of original design. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi! I hope everything is fixed now. Thanks. --Alan Moraes (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Looks OK now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

File erased

Why was my image erased? Zeburakeki (talk) 17:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

This file was game screenshot. See Commons:Screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Просьба восстановить файлы

Здравствуйте, EugeneZelenko! Опять обращаюсь к Вам. Разгребаю старые заявки в OTRS и обнаружил некоторые не доведённые до конца. Прошу Вас восстановить некоторые файлы, на которые пришло разрешение, отсюда:

• File:Gabuda blue jacket.jpg
• File:Живой организм и распределение солей.png
• File:Кристаллохимия водорода1.png
• File:Кристалохимия водорода2.png
• File:Молекулы и невесомость.png
• File:Фазовые переходы и жизнь.png
• File:Физика и химия опьянения.png
• File:Химия на пороге тысячелетия.png. Ticket#2015091710004821. Категории и разрешение я проставлю.

Этот файл надо удалить, на текст и фотографию разрешения нет:

• File:Активность и упорство.pdf. Заранее огромное спасибо! Возможно, придётся к Вам обратиться ещё не раз! С огромным уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 20:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Огромное спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 16:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

removings

You are not normal Lukashenko u of removings wiki. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 00:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Files which I deleted were not-trivial logos. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Administrator Didym report

Hello! First, sorry for my bad english. I am the main contributor on Hungarian commons in last two and half years (200,000+ edits, over 1000 renaming etc.).

I have problems with an admin (user:Didym) whom you gave admin rights (14:53, 1 January 2013). This admin uploaded one word titled photos (that I dared to rename) 'Kettenbrücke' and 'Kettingbrug', these are bad file names (in my opinon) for Hungarian wiki: 'Széchenyi lánchíd', German 'Kettenbrücke (Budapest)' English: 'Chain Bridge (Budapest)' or 'Széchenyi Chain Bridge'.

He threated me for renaming. He deleted my answer from his site, and moved to my. My opinon this person is not worthy to 'Admin'.

In case if I'm wrong and the Rename was unjust,-it means to me I do not understand renaming conditions, -then I want to give back the right to rename instead to harass.

We have no leader at the Hungarian Commons, therefore, I ask You, helping.

P.S. This message (Hungarian version) is sent to the head of the Hungarian Wikipedia. Sincerely, - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I think Commons:Administrators' noticeboard will be best place to discuss this problem. Sorry, I don't know Hungarian, so I could not have own opinion about file names. User:Didym answer seems reasonable for me, but I understand that you may have opposite opinion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

By the way: the part mentioning the removal of rights was not meant as: "I will do it myself", but rather "I will start a discussion and let the community decide". It seems also that Globetrotter19 and I had some misunderstandings, probably caused by the fact we are both non-native speakers of English. --Didym (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

O.k. I understood. I copied the text to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Thanks for help! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

RE: Etiquetado de la imagen File:Acción Deportivo Cali.jpg

Hi,

The file Acción Deportivo Cali is only text and can't be protected by copyright. As you can see in the license text that appears in the file: "...Facts, data, and unoriginal information which is common property without sufficiently creative authorship in a general typeface or basic handwriting, and simple geometric shapes are not protected by copyright". -- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 00:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

This images doesn't not consist on simple shapes and text only. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

It does. If you don't agree you can nominate it for deletion.-- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 18:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Prunus_lannesiana

Prunus lannesiana has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 11:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Népsport 1953-11-26.jpg

There is no need for permission, because this is a photocopy of a historical newspaper without any original work. This is in public domain. - Could you please remove the 'No permission' template? Thank you --Rlevente (talk) 13:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Articles and photos in newspaper is original work. You need to find information about photographers and journalists. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Non-protected works. The following works do not enjoy copyright protection: Facts and daily news. Facts and daily news that serve as a basis for press information: Article 1(5). --Rlevente (talk) 07:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Newspaper articles and photos are not pure facts or news. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Picture deletion request

Good evening Eugene, I am thankful of your feedback on my article pictures but I can't see the problem with these pictures not being taken by researchers of that project. These pictures are used in articles where I have taken them from where other scientists explain the principles of the work on that concept and are under the Creative Commons 4.0 license. Is there anything I can do to make these images not contradictive. Thank for your reply, Roman Kuzmić

Your message:

Files uploaded by Roman Kuzmić (talk · contribs)

Photos doesn't seems to be produced by researchers and could found on other sites, like http://thehightechsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/134776_186260511401661_6225633_o-1000x633.jpg.

• File:Model 1 10.jpg
• File:Figure-2-A-Wavestar-prototype-at-Hanstholm-DK-B-Sketch-of-floater-details-with.png
• File:Platforma.png Roman Kuzmić (talk) 07:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Photos are of low quality or small resolution. They don't seem like scientist own work. It'll be good idea to clarify sources with authors of artcile. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)