User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive19

Логотип компании

Евгений, добрый вечер! Я загружал логотип компании, видимо не совсем корректно это сделал, произошло удаление. Скажите, пожалуйста, как я теперь могу загрузить его?

Это можно сделать, если явно компания разрешит использовать логотип на условиях свободной лицензии. несвободные изображения можно загружать в проекты, которые их допускают, например, русскую Википедию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Bosquito images

Hello Eugen, it's come to my attention that all images related to the band Bosquito were deleted- I received permission from the band to use them. They were all publicly available, being featured in print, billboards, internet, and other public media. Is it too late to have them re-listed? I have 10,000 other photos I can use, but I'd like to get the copyright information set right before trying again.

Please ask band to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Northern Lights Pinball Logo

Even after setting the copyright as a pd-textlogo, you still chose to delete it? Why? I'm a member of Northern Lights and the logo belongs to us. Un-delete the image.

Sorry, this logo is much more complicated then text. Please ask your company/organization to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

image deletion

Hi, i am the autor of the images, What should I do to prove it?

Zelenko, why are you delete my documents, no mail, no information, just delete ?!?!?!?!?! All photos and documets are from my family album. I sign them as my own. Pictures are historical 80 years old.

Please specify precise sources. Even if photo is in your family album, it may be made by somebody outside your family. Own work is not correct claim anyway. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Dear Eugen, Look at first photo. My grandpa in uniform. He had gone to photographer who taken photo and my grandpa paid for this. It was Warsaw 1932. Between 1939 and 1945 our capital was totally razed. No any citizens or buildings left. This photo is also in historical book mention in biography of wiki page. What copywgight you expect from me ? Also, my grandpa gave his photo to author of historical book, This book is mention in biography on wiki page. I agree I didn't properly fullfil wikimedia due to I placed right biography in wikipedia but delete option is cruel for me.

Old photos made in Poland, falls under {{PD-Polish}}.

Files were not deleted immediately, but after a week of problem notification.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I know, I can't spend all my time in internet, so please unblock them and I will add them in right category with right copywright description.

I restored your files. Please note that you have no more then a week to fix license/information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

What's the problem?

• Hey, You delete some pictures... I don't if you want to delete any picture but please put another picture inside the information because now it is so horrible for to read without picture.. And thank you very much for your support. --Angagosa (talk) 23:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

  You could upload non-free files like logos into projects which allow them, for example, English Wikipedia. Please aslo read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

• Hey. I don't very know English. I am file uploading at Commons. Why demonstrated deletion candidate? What's the problem? Contribution to do? I don't understand (!)(?) --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

  Please read Commons:Project scope. Commons has excessive collection of domesticated cats images already. Low resolution photos without artistic qualities will not add anything new there. Same sparrows which is very common bird. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

• I read the reason for deleting. A few more files. If installed on the site crashes? Then don't need to make contribution here. Because completed the content. In addition, files are not disgrace. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy%20policy/BannerTestAAnyone can not install a featured picture. My contribution enthusiasm and good intentions gone... There are numerous pictures like the pictures that I have installed. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

  I'm sorry, if I hurt your feeling. But I think it's good idea to maintain quality levels for photos of commons subjects. I myself do not upload every photo I made and I don't have anything against if some of them will be replaced with better quality ones. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

• Okay. I'm not able to deal. Direct deleted. These pictures were moved to the Turkish Wikipedia. There has not been deleted. After that, I'll be more careful about the file. Thanks. Good wikis. -- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

  I think it'll be good idea if you'll try to understand difference between private photo-hosting and WMF projects (including Turkish Wikipedia and Commons). It doesn't takes long time to see which images are already available and what new you could bring to existing collection. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

• File:Sadat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests

HELLO, I WANT TO INCLUDE THE ABOVE NAMED FILE IN MY USERPAGE, HOW DO I GO ABOUT IT THEN THANNK YOU. Masssly (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Just do it and leave note on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Request

Hi. I have a request to you. Can you delete this picture? Only used on Wikipedia. Unnecessary to be here... --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Ankara :-( But if Commons doesn't have photos of same area with better quality, photo is in Commons:Project scope. So your request is unreasonable on my opinion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes. According to you is unreasonable. But these images can be used only Turkish Wikipedia. Uploading pictures here, why do you think? Because images can at the all Wikimedia projects. It comes to picture is district photo. Only there being used. Aside from this. I possess all the rights as the person who make up the picture. I don't want the image to be here. Therefore, I request you to delete. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you please provide link to category with images of district on Commons? Just to compare situation with domesticated cats :-)

I don't think that city districts are notable for one particular project. There are probability that such articles may appear on other language editions of Wikipedia as well as Wikivoyage or Wikibooks in book about Ankara. Other possible usage is Commons:GeoCommons (and possible external sites) if you'll add coordinates.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

• Okay. Keep for Wikivoyage. There is a similar picture to him a few neighborhood. If the not problem install them. I obviously a little worried. I am uploading photos at Commons. There are pictures cats as well as the likelihood of a problem. Those pictures are not deleted. I recommend to you read the keep the reasons. They can be used global scale as you say. Wikispecies, Wikiversty and others project... There are no users who should be deleted. I think not more. Stop the request for deleting the pictures. Because the deletion is not possible. I would like to continue to contribute to a happy and relaxed... Thank you. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

  To understand difference you need to explore Category:Felis silvestris catus with all subcategories, including Category:Licking cats and category about particular part of Ankara. Please also read Commons:Project scope (especially discussion section), if you still didn't do this. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

What is the love of this deletion? For this reason I said. Don't the make a contribution. Content is finished. I go to Africa. I find a lion. I take the photo to internal organs. Or something similar. I ınstall to a picture at Commons. It will be deleted? What is the harm in those pictures? A user in a comment there. "They are totally in scope. We can use them on related articles. Also they are being used in user's personal pages". More pictures installed on the site doesn't crash. Then delete the other pictures. What's the point? Even a couple of cats too. No picture is out of copyright is not deleted. If the image is not a disgrace. Already we'll see. It not deleted the pictures... Keep the Ankara photos. No problem about that. And finally. Write the your posts at the my talk page for In your answer to be aware. This a little advice. Thank. Good works... --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Process of finding something useful should not resemble process of finding needle in hay heap. Sure if you will make photo of rare subject - it'll be useful. Sorry, but this is hard to apply to domestics cats.

It's much easy to keep discussion in one place.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay. İn wait for the outcome of the debate. A decision is made. Let's wait, let's see. Good works. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Have a look at my bot's new request

Hi. I've made a new request long ago ^{[Commons:Bots/Requests/YiFeiBot (3)]}. Any suggestions? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Eddy Merckx

Hi EugeneZelenko,

Nice to meet you online.

I noticed you deleted a few of the photographs I uploaded. I read your message as to why you did that: because it might violate copyright.

I'm pretty confident the company I uploaded photos from, wouldn't mind that their pictures are used for WikiMedia. If I get a written approval from them,is it fine to use the photos?

Many thanks, Petervanham Petervanham (talk) 16:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Please ask company's legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Image deleted?

Dear Eugene, i just recognized, that you deleted the image of the publication ZWP (cover) on the Wikisite http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oemus_Media and i just wanted to ask you why? The image is free usable with the announcement of the source – what have i done wrong and how can i replace it as soon as possible without having it deleted again? Thank you so much for your help! best wishes, --Kaffeenerd (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Are terms of use available on Oemus Media site? If not, please ask company lawyer/legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Reason for Deletion of Photos

HI i have uploaded the photos for the films which N T Rama rao Jf acted. you had deleted those photos can i know why you have deleted those photos. i'm fan of NTR so i know the taste how i need to appear my hero on the screen. so i have updated those photos please will you update the last changes which i have done.

Regards User

Please read Commons:Licensing. You could make photos of your favorite actor yourself or try to find freely licensed images on Flickr, PicasaWeb, etc. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

In scope?

Hi Eugene. Can you take a look at Special:Contributions/DimaTailor? I reverted a spammy talkpage post by this user, and I wonder if any of these logos are in scope? Thanks for your time. INeverCry (talk) 22:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Looks like his name mostly mentioned on social networks, so notability is doubtful. Another issue - who own copyrights: designer himself or his customers? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Here we are: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DimaTailor. INeverCry (talk) 18:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Cepkask Logos

I send an e-mail about Copyright of our products. I wrote to Wikipedia Turkey about our images can be used in wikipedia or other wikipedia websites. So please undo this changes. You can find an information about our products and copyrights. You can see our e-mail in your services. We have permission and we show this in our e-mail.

Please ask company's lawyer or legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Recent deletion request

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Ment481&uselang=ru

The images are in fact uploaded by the photographer himself, whome I asked for permission via e-mail. He chose to simply put them here under CC-BY-SA himself, however, but that's perfectly legit. Here is his reply per my request

---

От кого: Игорь Игнатьев <zonawar2@gmail.com> Кому: Михаил <russianarmy2006@mail.ru>

12 июля, 4:08

Не проблема, время будет, опубликую я Вам эти фотографии. Спасибо, что Вы хоть разницу в них увидели.

---

screenshot of the message is here http://photo.rock.ru/img/e8ujP.png --RussianTrooper (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Думаю, что лучшим решение будет, если эта же лицензия будет указана на zonawar.ru. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Просто по идее вроде достаточно если сам автор загружает свои произведения под свободной лицензией. Письмо подтверждает, что загруженно именно автором, а не сторонним лицом. На других сайтах помимо zonawar.ru картинок оных я не видел. Так что может есть смысл не ставить файлы под удаление. Скриншот переписки могу отправить в OTRS, как подтверждение загрузки файлов самим автором. --RussianTrooper (talk) 18:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

А как понять, что Ment481 и Игорь Игнатьев - одно и то же лицо? Если автор хочет распространять произведения под свободной лицензией, то указание оной на сайте-источнике будет только расширять круг пользователей. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi guys. Since you speak Russian natively, perhaps you can convince Ment481 to clarify if the photos he uploaded were actually taken by him. I'm saying that because his website and his youtube channel have some videos which are clearly not made by him, but on which he overimposed his "zonawar.ru" logo. (See Commons:Deletion requests/File:ОЦ-14 2.jpg for details.) I don't know if that's the case for those photographs; I sincerely hope that they are legally his because they would be quite useful in a number of articles. Someone not using his real name (talk) 11:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

RE: images deletion from user Belfi

Vážený pán Eugene Zelenko

Z vašej strany došlo k opakovanému odstráneniu mnou nahratých img súborov ku, ktorým mám oprávnenie od vlastníka autorských práv kapely Abstract. Obrazový materiál pochádza z oficiálnych stránok vlastníka práv, ktorého som poverený zastupovať a mám od neho poverenie jednať v tejto záležitosti. Jednotlivým administrátorom som dnes dňa 16.7. 2013 posielal e-mail s vyrozumením o uverejnení daných diel a vyjadrení k licencii.

Prikladám vám to ako prílohu: odesílatel: Belfegor satan <belfegorsatan@gmail.com> komu: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org datum: 16. července 2013 15:46 předmět: OTRS posíláno přes: gmail.com

Dobrý deň,

žiadam Vás,ako poverená a oprávnená osoba o overenie a schválenie uverejnenia nasledujúcich diel po prečítaní vami požadovaného čestného prehlásenia o autorstve.

Týmto vyhlasujem, že som tvorcom a/alebo jediným držiteľom autorských práv DIEL: [1], [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

Súhlasím so zverejnením týchto diel za podmienok slobodnej licencie Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported [

].

Beriem na vedomie, že udeľujem komukoľvek používať dielo v komerčnom produkte a modifikovať ho podľa svojich predstáv. Som si vedomý, že vždy ostávam držiteľom autorských práv na svoje dielo a nechávam si právo byť uvedený ako autor v súlade so zvolenou licenciou. Zmeny, ktoré urobia iní, nebudú pripisované mne. Som si vedomý, že slobodná licencia sa týka iba autorského práva a vyhradzujem si možnosť zakročiť proti každému, kto použije dielo urážlivým spôsobom alebo poruší osobnostné práva, obmedzenia týkajúce sa obchodnej značky atď. Beriem na vedomie, že tento súhlas je neodvolateľný a že obrázok môže a nemusí byť permanentne umiestnený na projekte Wikimedia. 16.7. 2013, Belfi

V prípade nejasností kontaktujte mňa e-mail: belfegorsatan@gmail.com ako zástupcu pre túto záležitosť povereného zastupovaním kapely Abstract - Copyright © 2013 ABSTRACT prípadne kontaktujte e-mail:

abstractsk@yahoo.com

s pozdravom

             Belfi

Sorry, I don't know Slovak :-( Please use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for permission verification and undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

¿Por qué la solicitud de borrado de imágenes?

Saludosǃ Mira, mi inglés es bastante malo. Así que te escribo en español, que es mi lengua natal. Además, no tengo tiempo de traducirlo. Y como veo que tú has tenido bastante tiempo para revisar las imágenes que subí y enviar la solicitud de borrado, imagino que también lo tendrás para traducir este mensaje. Mi pregunta esː ¿Por qué marcaste las imágenes con la solicitud de borrado? Tienes que saber que todas esas imágenes son de dominio público, y ninguna viola los derechos de autor ni ninguna otra ley. Además, ninguna de esas fotos tiene uso comercial o publicitario, simplemente son de carácter educativo e informativo acerca de la Orden de agustinos Recoletos, que el a lo que hace referencia el título del escrito. Así que te pediría que quitaras la etiqueta de petición de borrado, o al menos me indiques cómo solucionar el problema con las imágenes que he subido. Muchas gracias. Afraycarlos (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Some of historical photos and paintings may be in public domain, but you should provide information about author/date of creation/date of publication/etc. If you made modern photos yourself, please upload originals in full resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Request

Hi There! Could you please complete my usurpation request from Soheyla Sh → Soheyla? I changed my username everywhere and need to change it on commons for Unified login. I'm sorry to disturb you but I'm kind of in a hurry and no Bureaucrat has been active in this project since May 31th. Thank you Soheyla _(Talk) 08:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Best wishes Soheyla _(Talk) 17:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Удаление фотографии Jerzy jedut.jpg

Здравствуйте! Я Valera143 заверяю что эта фотография была сделана мной 13 июля 2013 года, во время восемнадцатого центрального летнего лагеря в Польше в Бяла-Подляска. Просто это увеличение, поэтому я прошу чтобы эту фотографию не удаляли.

Думаю, что лучшим подтверждением Вашего авторства будет загрузка необработанного оригинала. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Вот, пожалуйста : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jerzy_Jedut_2.JPG И не можете ли Вы помочь обработать фотографию?

Спасибо большое! Я обновил запрос на удаление. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please restore File:Example of Open Data with IssySpots to highlight publics services.PNG

I'm the author of this picture. Thanks --Karima Rafes (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

You definitely used online map service for creating this map which looked as Google Maps for me. Please read Commons:Derivative works. You could make such images based on freely licensed resources such as OpenStreetMap.

Please don't use file name space for discussions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Sticker mistake?

Hi, the Calco pr. river plate 2000.jpg file, which you deleted, is a scan from a concert ticket (mine), which was scanned by myself, there is not a copyright violation in it. Please, I beg you: ask before, I didn't receive any advice in the least, the file just was deleted head first, why? Regards. --Materasi (talk) 16:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Did you just buy ticket or created its design yourself? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Bureaucrats

Hi Eugene, I'd like to know whether a bureaucrat (either you or other one) can take care of the use renaming task. There's a backlog of more than a month requests and I'd like to know whether if will happen in the near future. I got my name changed in the Spanish Wikipedia and not having it changed in here is causing me a lot of problems since I have to work with two different users (as there's sort of common login I've eventually edited in the Spanish wikipedia with two accounts, the one that got renamed and this one, as sometimes I log in here and resume editing in the Spanish wikipedia). Could you, or any of your colleagues, help me? Many thanks into advance --Ramones deprecated (talk) 06:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Many, many thanks :) --Stromare (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Rotatebot problem

Dear Admin Zelenko,

If you can, please try to send an E-mail to the operator of Rotatebot...that his bot has malfunctioned. This bot has broken down for 8 days now and the number of images waiting to be rotated is 930+ images. (as I said in the message to MGA73) Unfortunately, MGA73 is away and the bot operator is unlikely to respond to a Common's talkpage message as his userpage is inactive. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done. It may be ToolServer problem, so it'll be good idea to move bots on which Commons relies on to WMFLabs. I already suggested same idea to Para of GeoCommons fame. You could help with other tools :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you for your help. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Brandon Burlsworth Foundation Logo

I would like to appeal the deletion of this images. While it is a copyrighted image, I belive it is fairly used in the entry on [Brandon Burlsworth] to provide identification of the Foundation. Additionally, I am working with the Foundation to maintain the entry. Are there additional details I can provide to substantiate fair use and/or copyright holder's permission? Brandonwise (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

User JuTa also identified this image as a copyright violation. I was informed that Wikimedia Commons has different policies than English Wikipedia and suggested that I upload the file to Wikipedia with appropriate documentation. That is the course of action I will take. Brandonwise (talk) 18:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Picture Deletion

Dear Eugene,
you deleted the file File:Anti Everything Logo.jpg and suggested Anti Everything band picture.jpg for deletion. The story behind that is that I received both pictures by email directly from the band, claiming that they're free to use (I'm currently working on an article about the band). I meanwhile found out that the band maybe doesn't own the rights of the latter picture, for it's listed in a commercial picture archive. I suggest a deletion until I have further information on this picture. The first one however, the logo, should be fine. Please advise.
Kind regards,
--Grueslayer (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Free to use is very ambiguous term. One of licenses accepted by Commons is needed.

Please ask band to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

SUL Request

Hi! Could you please complete my usurpation request from Kelvin125 → Kelvin? I know, my name isn't Soheyla, so I've been waiting six weeks. Thank you in advance. Kelvin125 (talk) 03:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't think that it's good idea to usurp common names used in other projects (Italian Wikipedia and Wikiquote). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your, sorry, it's my opinion, incompetent response. What connection has an account on the Wiki it and on Commons? 20 bureaucrats had make it on other projects. Please read carefully this page. Kelvin125 (talk) 08:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to disappoint you, but I don't think it's good idea to do things which on my personal believe are wrong. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Coffret-boat-Runabout.jpg

You deleted photo file that was created by me and I am owner of this file. Do not understand you deleted, please note I am the CEO of Frederique Constant. Please reinstate image or contact me. Peter Stas Pcstas (talk) 13:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Please confirm your identity, position in company and permission (or ask legal department to do so) via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Eugene, will you please temporarily restore this image? I am attempting to verify authorization and need to view the image. Thanks, Cindamuse (talk) 08:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Maribel Álvarez.jpg

Hola:

En la información del archivo he especificado de qué web he cogido la imagen: http://radiojuventud.es/car/Radio_Juventud_de_Barcelona_EFJ-15/imagenes/MaribelAlvarez.jpg

¿Podrías indicarme qué dato falta, entonces?

Gracias

--Mirabela1982 (talk) 13:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Mirabela1982

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish :-( This is definitely historical photo. You need to find information about photographer, date of publication/creation, etc. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

Hello! I'm Qban and i've been blocked by you for this reason:

---

Your IP address has been automatically blocked because it was used by another user, who was blocked by EugeneZelenko. The reason given is:

Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "VIATG". The reason given for VIATG's block is "Uploading unfree files after warnings"

Start of block: 09:12, 4 August 2013 Expiry of block: 09:12, 5 August 2013 Intended blockee: 201.220.215.14 You may contact EugeneZelenko or one of the other administrators to discuss the block.

---

I'm not this VIATG user and this has allready happened to me in es.wiki and that is the reason i'm excent of been blocked on the es.wiki. I hope we're able to solve this out. Waiting four you to help me. --Qban (talk) 04:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done I exempted your account from IP blocking on Commons too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

User:YiFeiBot

Hello, on my request, User:YiFeiBot is doing a large categorizing job on Category:Population diagrams of municipalities in France a category containing 38.000 files. The bot has done over 2/3 of the job. It's not my bot, but nonetheless I should like to understand what this bot is doing wrong, for what reason you blocked it one day. The bot is intended to do the same on the subcategories of Category:OpenStreetMap maps of communes in France, selecting the not yet categorized files. For details about my request see here and here. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't think that it's good idea to make 38.000 changes without bot flag. It's also good idea to discuss implementation of request on Commons:Bots/Requests first before doing mass changes. Please note that this account was already blocked for similar problems in past. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

That block was about cooldown period. Also, the requested Commons:Bots/Requests/YiFeiBot_(4) got no response, so I'm not sure that I shouldn't ran it. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:13, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I did the botjob request, and Zhuyifei1999 accepted my request, we discussed it over. I have now looked at Commons:Bots/Requests and saw his botrequest:HERE. But under discussion about this botrequest I see a completely different subject. Is there something gone wrong with the treatment of his request? --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

(this is kind of offtopic) that thing under #discussing is another request. The actual request is here. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

There are definitely no discussion in this request (was test run OK? could anything be improved? etc). Sorry Zhuyifei1999, but mass bot edits could be made after task approval only. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

It's ok, but could you crats discuss a more clearer version of Bot policy (for example, how much edits at least are considered mass) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:52, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't think that it's possible to define mass precisely, but commons sense tells that thousands and even hundreds are definitely mass. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)

I Havang(nl) apologize, it was my first botjob request. I discussed it over in detail, I did not encounter any need for improvements, the run has been oke so far. Can the bot get a task approval and a botflag yet, can it get legalised yet? --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

You request was completely OK, it's responsibility of bot owner to follow some rules. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

About bot policy

Sorry, but I don't get it. When we get a work from COM:BR, we first need to get an approval from COM:BRFA? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

I understand now, that a bot running without a botflag causes unnecessary work to the patrollers by "flooding" the edits to be patrolled; if the bot has a flag, the bot-edits don't arise on the patrols list and then, there is no flooding. A botflag prevents that unnecessary work. Let's wait for a botflag. --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

First page is to discuss job proposal (how to implement it), second - to finally approve a job (if it's not standard functionality) and get bot status (if needed). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh, thanks for explaining it to me. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

When does the bot start again?

Hello, it seems there is still a problem. As the work has been half done, when does the bot start again? --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

I wrapped up request discussion. I think could be approved after ~ 2 days. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Why did you delete this my pictures?

Of course they were not my own work.

But they were shared publicly with no right reserved. And that is how I listed the pictures. Authors will publish some of their pictures with no rights reserved on their websites under a "promo" section. The reason for this is for things like what I was doing with the wikipedia page. Authors make these photos public so people can use them in various things without fear that they will get in trouble or sued.

I admire you for trying to clean up wikimedia commons, but please ask the people who uploaded the pictures first. I was out of town during the time it was up for eviction.

Brookspowell629 (talk) 14:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Brookspowell629

I don't think that promo images are necessarily not copyrighted. There is such thing as fair use for copyrighted images. Declining of some rights (free licenses) should be stated by author clearly. Please also read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
	Eugene, thank you for your tireless work. Thank you for tracking copyvios all over the years! Keep up the good work! High Contrast (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. This is a logical consequence for your work all over the last years. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Russavia (de-Bureaucrat)

I have very serious reservations about this process. First off how this vote came to start is problematic. Secondly we seem to have a non-Commons community (en.wikipedia) attempting to decide our Bureaucrats for us given the evidence of canvassing at least through Jimbo's talk page on en.wikipedia. And thirdly I do not think the issue is advertised enough for the general community to know. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 13:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Мои фотографии

Привет. Ты писал мне ето? Можеш ты мне объяснять это по русски? Я не понимаю хорошо английски. Но фотографии мои, я являюсь автором. Как я могу это доказать? Или подтвердить? --Redmir (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Не надо уже, чтобы ты мне объяснял это. Я уже прочитал это на словацком языке. Но я хочу знать, как подтвердить, что снимки мои... --Redmir (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Думаю, что лучшим способом подтвердить авторство будет загрузка оригинальных (необработанных) снимков с EXIF. Например, если обработка заключалась в обрезке, то тогда - полный снимок. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Uncategorized own images

How can I filter my own pictures whether they are missing categories? I've probably still missed some of my uploads.--Kopiersperre (talk)

Frankly, I don't know solution :-( Will be good idea to look at ToolServer and WMF Labs tools. If there is no such tool available, it's good idea for one :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Search out catscan2 which can look for the intersection of categories of images with links to templates like {{Uncategorized}}, which gets added by bots to images without cats. For my geograph images work I ended up writing my own bit of Python to find hidden and public categories which became handy to find those without any categories, however I don't have a generally available tool. --Fæ (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AspieNo1#Copyright_notices:

Update for you on pictures ... please review documentation

Please ask Damon Matthew Wise to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). But this permission could not affect images which owned by other entities (like Martin Maher/Daily Star). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Done - repeatedly - and not uploaded - have resorted to copying copies of messages of same ... see article https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AspieNo1#.3D.3D_.22Please_release_me.2C_let_me_go.22_says_Damon.21

Please undelete the pictures, as evidence in chat and communication by the photographers who granted rights to the subject are also shown. AspieNo1 (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

The person who gave the rights and the original photographer who was commissioned to shoot the images and sold them have both asserted the rights-holder is, common to the case taken by the case-holder Damon Matthew Wise Vs Facebook (2010) entitled to use his own image and transfer and use and bestow as he sees fit. If he has given and stated to have given those rights to all kinds of social networking sites in relation to media coverage of himself as a journalist and any voluntary and community, or charity-work in autism and Disability areas then you better have a Dog-gone good reason to be breaching his right to have them appropriately used here with his repeatedly stated permission. Please undelete all of his images now. AspieNo1 (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for repeating, but please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission processing and image undeletion. I don't have OTRS access. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Panamusic

Hello Eugene. I detected the origin of these pictures: http://www.tvn-2.com/tucaramesuena/ A clearly copyvio from a Panamanian reality show webpage. --Taichi (talk) 00:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Reporting block evasion

Hi, Eugene. I see that yesterday you blocked CavaleiroDragaoTV (talk · contribs). You may want to know that AndreCampos324 (talk · contribs) is the same user evading the block. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me˱_{M @ C S}˲» 16:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Let me explain better... I made a check on Portuguese Wikipedia, where these accounts used to add unfree files. They are confirmed socks on pt.wikipedia. As both have unified login, they are confirmed here as well. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me˱_{M @ C S}˲» 16:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for help! Just in case (there may be other sock-puppets) I created Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/CavaleiroDragaoTV. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Nice. I am watching that page.—Teles «Talk to me˱_{M @ C S}˲» 03:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

I blocked User:AndreCampos324 indefinitely. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

These Images

Dear Admin Zelenko,

• You deleted one of this person's images as a copyright violation (as I see on this person's talkpage) but please feel free to make decision to pass or tag them with nsd/npd on these other images. The uploader has the same note for the author of the images: "4 fotos tomadas por Erika Romero" or '4 photos taken by Erika Romero'

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

I deleted poster, but sure, origins of rest of images are unclear. I tagged them as no permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment: Thanks for making a decision here. I don't know if Erika Romero is the uploader and the uploader does not say so. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/Hazard-Bot 10

Hi Eugene, I've left a notation at Commons:Bots/Requests/Hazard-Bot 10, could you possibly look at that thanks. Cheers, russavia (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Please remove threat to delete images in view of documentation " This media may be deleted." in AspiesNo1

The date has passed and location, details and copyright information have been repeatedly given, explaned, quantified, disected in detail and recombined.

Please consult Page on Aspies editors language and style, information and content if you need to know about the rights owner, and myself and our usages of language. AspieNo1 (talk) 09:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission processing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Фотографии ВКонтакте

Здравствуйте! У человека, не зарегистрированного в ВП, есть фотографии для иллюстрации статьи о селе. Против загрузки на Викисклад он не возражает, но хотел бы избежать лишней мороки. Если он выложит их ВКонтакте со ссылкой на лицензию, а я их загружу на Викисклад - это законно? Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Конечно, ничего плохого в этом варианте нет :-) Надо только, чтобы после загрузки лицензию подтвердил кто-то с правами администратора или image reviewer. Для этого не помешал бы шаблон типа {{Flickrreview}}. Правда, я за проверку лицензии не возьмусь, т. к. учётной записи ВКонтакте у меня нет, а заводить ещё одну игрушку не хотелось бы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо! Тогда так и сделаю. А то статья неплохая, а фотографии - только из окна автобуса. Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 14:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DR

Hi! You probably just forgot to add a reason. Do you still remember? Here's the image. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thank you for pointing to this problem. I finished nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

deleted logo

Hello, could you explain me what's the problem with this file [logo chaa]? Why has it to be deleted?--MatrixCM (talk) 09:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

This was non-trivial logo. You could ask organization to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Как добавить фотографию, чтобы ее не удалили?

Добрый день, Евгений! На странице http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Суворова,_Дарья, которую я редактирую в последнее время в силу своей работы ПР-менеджером данной певицы, периодически возникает проблема с авторством добавленных мною фотографий, я указываю авторство, ссылку на официальный сайт певицы, где размещены фотографии, и все равно их удаляют, как поступить, какой источник указывать? Спасибо

Надо оформить разрешение от правообладателей и послать его в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом Вы можете попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановление изображений. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Roger Craig Smith

I have added another source and I have retrieved an author as well. If you think there is something wrong with the file or what I have added to it, please leave me a message on my talk page and I will reply. - Thanks - KikdaBuffoon889 (talk) 17:29, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Where license statement could be found? Creative works are copyrighted by default, until they are not in public domain or author release some rights (== free license). Please read Commons:Licensing carefully before making any other uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

The licensing statement can be found at the bottom of the page. It says "Content is avaliable under CC-BY-SA". It's clearly visible at the bottom of the page and why does the tag say still needs an author? I already provided an author. KikdaBuffoon889 (talk) 15:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

You need to distinguish license for text content and images in wikis. Please look on English Wikipedia as example. Looks like wiki in question doesn't care about image licensing questions at all: there are a lot of screenshots and copyrighted characters without any studio references. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

I know where your coming from, but I'm telling you that if studio references were present I would add them in a blink. But I'm going by what's shown right now, with it's copyrighting and licensing properties that do not restrict what I have done. -- KikdaBuffoon889 (talk) 22:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

It's good idea to avoid unreliable sources if you don't want to waste your time. Anyway there are other methods to find images sources like Google Images or Tin Eye. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

who are you?

need help? children in age ten. Do you even Israelite? why you deleted Files, and i I was looking harder than you can just imagine.

Idiot.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zueu5671 (talk • contribs)

Please calm down and read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

FYI:

This user just won a 4 week vacation which can be used to grow up a little. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?)

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Фото ФШ Чертаново

Привет. Может, хватит удалять мои фотки отсюда? https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Чертаново_(центр_образования)

Во-первых, я их автор. Во-вторых, все они у нас в альбомах в открытом доступе.

http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/chertanovo-football/

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Участник:Glebasty

Лучший способ подтвердить авторство - загрузить изображения в оригинальном разрешении с EXIF. Открытый доступ без указания лицензии мало о чём говорит. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

У меня тоже есть совет, тем кто борется с пиратством. Оставить в покое детские школы и заниматься коммерческими страницами, которых тут полно. Совесть надо иметь.

For Your Kind Attention

You have a message at Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Biographies_of_Living_Persons_and_Defamation. Thanks, JKadavoor Jee 16:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

File:BibiVaplanUmbrella.jpg

Picture provided by Bianca Mayer herself (pers. comm.). Copyright declaration should be delivered soon (or has been delivered in the meantime).--Panda17 (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Please ask Bianca Mayer to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

She did send the permission on Sept 11, 2013, 10:29 CET, I got a CC. Tell me (or her) whether there are still any open issues with the picture. I see that the picture is still tagged.--Panda17 (talk) 10:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Description still doesn't contain OTRS reference. You need to ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard and specify file name and copyrights owner there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

General Sisi

Hi EugeneZelenko,

I understand your message. and to pay more attention. My user name appropriate? Turkish Wikipedia has banned me for the name. Thanks for support.--General Sisi (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Looks like I need to know Turkish to understand meaning of your user name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Letters to the permissions on all my files posted on permissions-commons@wikimedia.org already been sent

Здравствуйте, Eugene! Письма с разрешениями относительно всех размещённых мною файлов на permissions-commons@wikimedia.org уже отосланы. Прошу файлы не удалять. Спасибо! Hello, Eugene! Letters to the permissions on all my files posted on permissions-commons@wikimedia.org already been sent. Please do not delete files. Thank you! -- Lightfairy (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Вы можете попросить помощи с проверкой разрешения на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

• Спасибо! Прочтя ответы на стандартные вопросы, я поставила на файлы шаблоны относительно отсылки писем с разрешением на permissions-commons. Думаю, этого пока достаточно? --Lightfairy (talk) 14:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

  Надо добавлять, а не разворачивать шаблоны :-) Но не помешает воспользоваться Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard - так будет быстрее и надёжнее. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

  • К сожалению, опыта работы здесь у меня пока ещё маловато, вот я слегка и «облажалась».. )) Евгений, извините, что я Вас «достаю» своими вопросами, но «не помешает воспользоваться» в каком плане: поторопить их? обратить на что-то особое внимание? или что-то ещё? Кстати, а Вы сами к этим разрешительным письмам доступ имеете? Если да, то я была бы Вам очень признательна за ускорение процесса легализации загруженных файлов. Разрешения посланы автором/правообладателем в письмах от 12 сентября (возможно 11 по US). Речь идёт об инновационном развитии российской музыкальной культуры, и будет очень обидно, если по каким-то причинам с этими файлами возникнут проблемы… Спасибо! --Lightfairy (talk) 16:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

    Вопросы - это нормально, даже лучше, чем их отсутствие :-) У меня нет доступа к OTRS, единственный метод ускорения процесса, который я знаю - Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Там вам надо указать список файлов, имя правообладателя, чтобы письмо нашлось быстрее, и язык, чтобы нашёлся доброволец, который его знает. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

• Спасибо, попробую! --Lightfairy (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

SamoaBot 2

Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages at Commons:Bots/Requests/SamoaBot 2. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ricordisamoa 16:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Magazín ČD pro vás.PNG

Hi EugeneZelenko. I think there was OTRS permission in File:Magazín ČD pro vás.PNG (ticket:2013061110007071), wasn't it? Please, restore this file. Thank you. --Harold (talk) 17:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I overlooked OTRS. I restored file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks (nl74bot)

Hi, many thanks for your feedbacks. Best regards, Nl74 (talk) 13:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

licensed images deleted from commons

I have not been given Permission to upload images, so I have been using commons area. I uploaded a product photo/logo to go along with a story and it was deleted. The text talks about products specifically so the images were just adding a visual to the already approved story. The reason given was advertisement. The images were not advertising any more than the text that has been active for some time. I spent time improving pages only to have it all undone.

Please advise. Do I need to wait to be granted permission to upload images or were these deleted in error? How can I get access to upload images faster?

Thanks.

Where license statement could be found on source site? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I used both images I took with a camera and images of products from a website. Permission was also given by company to use.

Please ask company's legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Just sent. Please advise if that is all you need.

Please read my previous answer carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

You suggested some graphic files be deleted at Rudrene (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC). They were inserted into Wikipedia's webpage N-body problem to help the reader. The ones you want to delete are of my own invention (all are) and they give a numerical example, along with a short computer code for doing the example by computer rather than by hand; they were mainly for checking the algebraic equations developed therein, if the reader wanted to. I'm new at Wikipedia and don't know or understand all the rules yet (to say the least). Any help would be appreciated. There are graphic files I would like to delete because they are obsolete, but I don't know how. Thank you.Rudrene

MediaWiki has better ways to present tables, formulas and source code then images. See en:Help:Table, en:Help:Displaying a formula and mw:Extension:Code for details. You could nominate file for deletion or use {{Speedy}} to remove not needed files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Crew-Barbasol-Home-Jersey.jpg deletion

I am writing here to make sure this photo can stay up on Commons: Unlikely to be own work Reuploaded after File:Crew-Barbasol-Home-Jersey.jpg deletion. External web site was source in first case. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

This needs to be kept as I took, own and uploaded the file:

~KEEP~ I took this picture of an actual jersey I own. I cleaned up the background in Photoshop and uploaded to commons wizard myself as the owner of the photo and file.

The photo is time and date stamp from a iPhone 4 camera.

As you can see there is a big difference between the files. The first was hung on a manikin and the second was on a flat surface. These files are in no way related or come from the same source. - PerioInc

You could upload original unprocessed image with EXIF to support your authorship claims. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Done: File:Photo-Columbus-Crew-Jersey-Proof-of-Ownership.JPG|thumb|This photo is proof of ownership to allow File:Crew-Barbasol-Home-Jersey.jpg on Commons to be used.

HELP

i need an explanation of why de images of the toy are going to be deleted please i would like to keep improving the article of saint seiya mith cloth toys please please --Cheposo (talk) 20:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Reasons are stated on nomination pages. Please also read Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Math Help

Math help especially, and the other pages as well, looks very good and I am studying them now. Very exciting. Thank you for the good help! (I'm learning.)Rudrene (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Deleting old files with same name?

How does one delete an old file with the same name as the new file? Can't seem to isolate the old file for deletion. Pleas help.Rudrene (talk) 14:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

If new file is correction of old one, you could upload new version. If it's name clash, you need to choose different name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus for targets whose architects/ designers are still alive or it is less than 50 years since their death. Thus even excellent photos which violate copyright laws, could be deleted from Commons. There are several such photos e.g. from your mother Hanna Zelenko, which are likely non-FOP cases. Kindly note, however, that citation use might still be allowed. In such a case this (these) photo(s) should be - without delay - saved to and used from national wikipedia (as they are likely to be deleted in Commons). BR, Paju (talk) 22:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

ALL IMAGES ARE IN COMMONS

why you deleted that amount of images in commons 2.5

Links:

http://www.villate.org/docs.html

http://pt.scribd.com/doc/48312774/Fisica-Nuclear

http://oer.avu.org/bitstream/handle/123456789/160/F%C3%ADsica%20At%C3%B3mica.pdf?sequence=1

the images are under 2.5 commons from portugal you do not need to delete them , please revert your actions(Thepalerider2012 (talk) 01:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC))

Could you please be more specific? Which images were taken from which site?

For future uploads you need to be much more accurate: you should not claim authorship over other people works and properly credit sources and specify licenses.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Thepalerider2012

here are the list you and other moderator deleted , the pics are from 2.5 sharalike documents which i know the author of the text but these images are from internet that the authors of the documents used to make their points of views (Thepalerider2012 (talk) 16:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC))

There are two sections in deletion request: about images and tables. Which section do you refer? If you mean tables, please read w:en:Help:Table and Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

don't delete my images!

why are you deleting my images? what gives you the right to do that? Jatlas (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Project scope. Please also read w:en:Help:Table (or equivalent on your native language) to find out best method of representing tables.

It will be also good idea if you learn about SVG and categorization, so you contributions will be even more valuable.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Revert deletions from

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Thepalerider2012

i will give the proper atribuition to the author (from the text) (Thepalerider2012 (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2013 (UTC))

Francesco Elio Bruno

Hi The photos (excluding newspaper and diplomas) are the property of Francesco Elio Bruno because they were taken by the father who died several years ago. I also wrote to italian administrator "Fabexplosive" because I'm not good with english. --Silviafrediani (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Silviafrediani

Please send identity and authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ukraine-Mukacheve-Palanok Castle-32.jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 10:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Brimstone-el pacto.jpg You erase this file. I made it speciallly for Wikipedia. I did not take it from Internet. Please repare this situation.Desost (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

delete

	enjoy
	delete all my photos soon BS JP (talk) 15:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

2 DR's

Dear Admin Zelenko,

Please feel free to close this DR which I withdrew.

As for this other DR, I don't know if you wish to make a comment or think it is a speedy delete candidate.

Best Regards from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done for first one, Denniss was first for second one :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

• Thank You for your kind reply and action on the second DR. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Под каким разрешением выкладывать?

1. Скан с графика в газетной статье
2. Скан с ценового буклета
3. Скан с образной технической инструкции (например, картинку раскладки переключения передач)
4. Скан с общедоступных материалов финансово и технического характера, находящихся в ежегодных публичных отчётах компаний.
   

--Игорь Хаджиев (talk) 20:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Подобные изображения загружать нельзя, если они явно не лицензированы под свободными лицензиями или не перешли в общественное достояние. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Меня не удовлетворяет такой ответ. Я просто знаю, какие нередко здесь бывают дискуссии по спорным вопросам, что говорит о том, что мало кто в чём понимает. Так нельзя делать в США? где-то ещё? Если на документе нет указаний, что все права защищены, это значит, что он в общественном достоянии? В Вики есть конкретно прописанный запрет? Можно подробнее объяснить? Ну и потом, я так понимаю, что высшая цель Вики — информационно-познавательная. Когда запрещено загружать фотографии людей, так как есть конкретные законы в США на эту тему, это конечно неприятно, но фото можно найти в интернете. Но технические описания просто требуют образных подсказок. А самоограничение на запрет загрузок образных описаний технического плана здорово понижает познавательную ценность, требует массы текста, который по-любому не сможет заменить образ, и требует подтверждений, которые так же не всегда могут быть получены в текстовом виде.

Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. В общественное достояние произведения переходят после истечения некоторого времени (например, в РФ - 70 лет после смерти автора) или если того явно пожелал автор. Есть и другие случаи, например, в США не охраняются изображения из патентов. Несвободные изображения можно загружать в проекты, которые их допускают (английская, русская Википедия и т. д.). Также Вы сами можете сделать фотографии или чертежи технических объектов. Это касается и внешних и внутренних деталей автомобилей. Кстати, поищите здесь, например, в Category:Automatic transmissions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Давайте разберём все четыре моих пункта по-конкретнее. Просто, я могу полагать, что они являются произведениями, в которых нечему охраняться. Что может охраняться в ценовом буклете? Что может охраняться в образной технической инструкции? Случай с общедоступными материалами финансового технического характера — он конечно сложнее. Но ведь в иных случаях, на таких материалах явно указано «Все права защищены», а в иных ничего подобного нет. И как тут быть? А если взять такой утрированный вариант: вот чек за покупку я могу выложить? а рекламный буклет, брошенный мне в почтовый ящик? --Игорь Хаджиев (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Я думаю, что Вам стоит прочитать закон об авторском праве хотя бы одной страны. Ценовой буклет - реклама, которую кто-то создал: сделал фотографии, написал текст и т. д. Данные из буклета: цены, технические характеристики не охраняются авторским правом. Чек за покупку, если он состоит из только из текста - это только данные. Но с другой стороны, зачем он здесь нужен? Указание «Все права защищены» - необязательны, в отличие от отказа от некоторых из прав. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Главная суть всех законов об авторском праве: авторское произведение защищается от возможного получения прибыли на его коммерческой эксплуатации иными лицами. Вы согласны, нет? Вопрос, можно ли в принципе получить прибыль от чужого ценового буклета, от образной инструкции? Наверно, нет. И на таких документах практически никогда не стоит значок «все права защищены». Вы говорите, что подобный значок не обязателен. Но как же тогда любой человек сможет отличить, что является общественным достоянием, а на что распространяются права собственности? Я, например, считаю, что на образную техническую инструкцию права собственности не распространяется. Вы, допустим, считаете, обратное. Но для целей Вики моя точка зрения ценнее. Если в Вики нет прямых указаний на этот счёт, почему бы тогда её не принять? Или тогда надо что-то чётко прописать. (Поймите, я всё это пишу не ради отстаивания права на выкладывание чего бог на душу положит, просто я считаю это важным, а со стороны Вики нет чётко прописанных правил на эту тему). --Игорь Хаджиев (talk) 15:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Соблюдение авторского права - основопологающий принцип Commons, смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. По умолчанию, произведения защищены авторским правом, если не указано обратное или не истёк срок действия имущественнй прав. Для того, чтобы понять детали, как я уже рекомендовал, Вам надо ознакомится с законом об авторском праве хотя бы дной страны. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Вы меня опять отсылаете к тому, что не даёт чёткого ответа. Где та грань, когда совокупность линий становится произведением? Например, если взять загруженный мной файл File:Manual Transmission 13 Eaton-Fuller.png, то является ли он произведением искусства? — по, моему нет, так как в нём нет главного свойства произведения искусства — уникальности! Подобная картинка может быть сделана практически любым человеком за час работы. Если, например, я скажу, что это — моя работа, сам Eaton не сможет это оспорить (он, правда, и не будет этого делать). А ведь это и в самом деле может быть моя работа. Как, например, и вот это File:PSA Peugeot-Citroen Engine 1.6HDi II power diagramm.jpg. К чему я вообще всё это веду? — к тому, что в Вики всё достаточно просто и понятно, когда вопрос касается настоящих произведений искусства — предметов, рисунков, уникальность которых понятна любому на них смотрящему. Но многие технические чертежи и эскизы могут быть повторены безо всяких технических проблем любым специалистом, владеющим инструментами. Что делать с ними? считать их за произведения искусства, или считать их за произведения, в которых нечему охраняться? Вопрос важный, так как Вики очень страдает от отсутствия подобных чертежей в своих запасах. А на каком основании в Вики находятся логотипы компаний? — это ведь тоже объект авторского права! Вобщем, может эту тему вынести на какое-то более широкое обсуждение? Пжлста, поймите, я ратую не за бесконтрольную загрузку разных графических файлов, наличие которых в Wikimedia может вызвать судебные разбирательства. Просто вопрос неоднозначный и важный. Мне надо какое-то решение, подкреплённое правилами и одобренное.--Игорь Хаджиев (talk) 18:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Перед тем, как что-либо обсуждать, надо знать предмет обсуждения. Без ознакомления с законом об авторском праве это имеет мало смысла. Кстати, чертежи относятся к пункту "планы, эскизы" статьи 1259. Имеет смысл создать свои произведения и отказаться от части прав на них, перед тем как судить о произведениях, созданными другими людьми. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Artemov ivan vladim-ch.jpg

В разделе Summary у каждого из перечисленных вами изображений (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Георгий_Елизаров) указано Own work. Прошу пояснить, есть ли необходимость сделать еще что-либо для приведения Описания/Summary в соответствие с требованиями. При загрузке этих изображений я заполнил все требуемые графы. Возможно, я что-то упустил. Буду признателен за консультацию. С уважением, Георгий Елизаров (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Насколько понимаю, это коллекция исторических фотографий, а не собственные произведения. Надо указать автора (если возможно), дату создания/публикации, источник публикации. Соответственно надо изменить лицензии. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо. Из указанных вами фотографий три (1930-х и 1940-х годов) действительно являются историческими:

File:Burba al-dr adolf-ch 1936.jpg,

File:Burba al-dr adolf-ch mar1940.jpg,

File:Burba al-dr adolf-ch okt1940.jpg.

Авторы их неизвестны, это снимки частного происхождения, первый сделан в фотоателье города Енакиево, два других - любительская съемка. Они нигде не публиковались. Я уже сделал исправления лицензии и описания к ним. Все остальные 13 фото являются моими собственными произведениями (имейте в виду, что мне 66 лет), так что описания и лицензии соответствуют требованиям. На этих фото изображены лично мне известные люди, а также объекты, на которых я бывал и медаль, полученная мною. Эти фото также нигде не публиковались, а делались для частного пользования. Кроме того, добавил категории ко всем упомянутым изображениям. Не знаю, надо ли в описании указывать дату съемки или же должна быть (как есть сейчас) дата загрузки в Commons? -- Георгий Елизаров (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Я убрал пометки про источник. Конечно, надо указать дату создания, хотя бы приблизительную. Только для фотографий, где автор неизвестен, надо так и указать (например, unknown). Также стоит создавать отдельную категорию, если на её тему есть много фотографий. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Да, я указал unknown для трёх старых фото. Даты (годы) съемок сейчас проставлю. Создам категорию, там будет 13 фотографий, относящихся к А. А. Бурбе. Спасибо за замечания и советы. В результате изображения получили надлежащее оформление. Всего доброго! -- Георгий Елизаров (talk) 17:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

About the Commons:Deletion requests of my upload

EugeneZelenko,thanks to notify me about my uploaded file File:ABM Mohsin.jpg and File:Screenshot of BdFISH.jpg that those go under Commons:Deletion requests. Actually I also want to delete this but I don't know how to delete that and that's why I'm waiting for response. Finally I thanked you for your works and assistance. I'm a newbie here that's why the error occur in fill up the information about the uploading. Thank you again. And in case of File:ABM Mohsin.jpg I would try to upload this original quality as soon as possible.

Please read Commons:Licensing. http://www.bdfish.org uses CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0, what is not compatible with Commons. Please upload File:ABM Mohsin.jpg in original resolution with EXIF to support your authorship claim. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

cual es tu problema?

una pregunta, dime en que te afecta que yo suba un biografia de un muchacho que es conocido localmente, dime en que te afecta con todo respeto creo que en nada, ese muchacho se a ganado con meritos su lugar en wikipedia, no por que haga una contribucion mundial pero lo hiso de manera local yo mismo entreviste al personaje y creo que es injusto que por una peticion tuya eliminen mi archivo, si no te gusto no lo veas asi de facil, si lo quieres que lo elimien no mas por que es joven, no mas por que no es la gran cosas creeeme que ese muchacho va aser alguien, pero bueno es tu forma de pensar pero la verdad, me siento ofendido con tu accion que la verdad no va

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please read Commons:Project scope. I personally doubt notability of musician. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Username change

Awesome, thanks. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Боты для WLM

Привет. Нужен статус бота для AHbot и IlyaBot как можно быстрее (можно временно до ноября). Эти боты используются сейчас для обслуживания конкурса WLM (категоризация, замена идентификаторов, добавления шаблонов). Они работали без статуса бота, но одного из них сегодня заблокировали. Без него часть работы в оргкомитете конкурса стоит. Поэтому хотелось бы, чтоб статус присвоили, как можно быстрее.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Думаю, что для этого стоит поскорее отвечать на вопросы и не забывать, что описание изменений читают не только роботы :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

hello. we have answered your questions. would you look at the requests? we DO need the flags ASAP... and we are really sorry we have forgotten to submit the requests earlier :( --アンタナナ 14:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done I hope next time winter will not come so unexpectedly :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

thank you very very much! so do i :) --アンタナナ 15:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Instituto Universitario Aeronáutico image

You deleted the image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EscudoIUA.png because copyright issues, but the image is from a University and it has no copyright issued.

It is a very absurd mistake to delete an image that represents an University, that it has no copyright assigned. Here is the source with the history behind the logo: http://www.iua.edu.ar/index.php?menu=72 (it is in Spanish, since you don't speak it I don't know how you will deal with it).

I must add: your edition history shows a lot of similar complaints. It wouldn't be better to have a little more of common sense? Thanks.

It's definitely non-trivial logo. Copyrights statement are not required. If this logo come into public domain, relevant information should be provided. See also Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Памятник "Родина-мать" в Киеве

Вы учавствовали в обсуждении удаления целого ряда фотографий, в том числе и загруженных мною в рамках конкурса "Вики любит памятники". Не могли б Вы мне объяснить более подробно суть происходящего. Если я правильно понял написанное на странице обсуждения, то изображения многих объектов, загруженных в рамках конкурса, нарушают авторские права. Почему тогда прицепились только к фотографиям этого монумента?
Зарание благодарю.--Сарапулов (talk) 17:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Конечно, в идеале при выборе идентификатора объекта, не перешедшего в общественное достояние, должно было бы выдаваться предупреждение или не разрешаться загрузка. К сожалению, приходится устранять последствия, а не причину. Я этим целенаправленно не занимаюсь, добавил запрос на удаление в паре случаев, которые бросились в глаза. В идеале, этим должны заниматься организаторы конкурса в стране, где нет свободы панорамы.

Смотрите также w:ru:Свобода панорамы.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо за разъяснение! Получается что в Викимедию нельзя загружать фотографии вообще ничего построенного после войны (2013-70=1943). А по остальным объектам каждый раз отыскивать время жизни автора проекта. А если это целый коллектив?--Сарапулов (talk) 17:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Да, Вы поняли правильно. В случае коллективного творчестве, срок действия имущественных прав исчисляется от даты смерти последнего из соавторов. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Ещё раз спасибо. Пойду теперь донимать руководство украинского конкурса.--Сарапулов (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Eugene,

I clean started on English Wikipedia as User:Sportsguy17, but it connected the account already as a new account on Commons. Could you usurp that account on Commons only and then rename this account from WorldTraveller101 to Sportsguy 17 Thanks. WorldTraveller101 (✉ • ✐) 17:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Could you please confirm on English Wikipedia that you own Sportsguy17 account? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

I have confirmed so. See Commons:Changing username/Usurp requests for the whole explanation of what I hope to occur. Thanks. WorldTraveller101 (✉ • ✐) 20:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Please check back at the usurp page. I have confirmed. Thanks for the help. WorldTraveller101 (✉ • ✐) 00:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Bot questions

1. Does editing in the bot's own userspace needs approval too? (such as User:YiFeiBot/WantedCategories)

   I don't think so, unless you'll make very frequent changes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

2. Does Commons:Bots/Requests/YiFeiBot (11) look okay? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:41, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

   I think will be good idea to hear from people who knows specific of Hebrew, Arabic, etc. alphabets. I could not make my own judgement: are these symbols completely useless or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

ok, thanks for your information. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:35, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Request about pictures I uploaded

Hi,

I give you more informations about the files I uploaded recently:

The following files are my own work (it took the picture myself) and were never published on any website before:

File:Lettre du 9 septembre 1969 de Raymond Queneau.jpg File:Lettre Raymond Queneau Editions de la Goulotte.jpg File:Bibliothèque de Jean-Marie Queneau.jpg File:Navigateur, éditions de la Goulotte.jpg File:Jean-Marie Queneau.jpg

For the others files, an authorization will be sent by Claude Stassart-Springer: she took the pictures and gave me the right to use them on wikipédia.

File:Oeuvre au pastel de Claude Stassart-Springer.jpg File:Dessin de Claude Stassart-Springer.jpg File:Editions de la Goulotte.jpg

The two last files were already published on other websites, so they can be deleted:

File:Oeuvre au pastel de Claude Stassart-Springer, détail.jpg File:Claude Sassart-Springer, oeuvre.jpg

Thank you, regards --Vedla77 (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Please use Commons:OTRS to confirm your identity and authorship for your own works (example: Commons:Email templates). Please ask Claude Stassart-Springer to do same thing. Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and processing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Carlo Martini image deletion

Hi, this is the situation about the images you proposed to delete: the author of the paintings is a painter of which I'm heir (so no one but me coud complain about copyright violations), the paintings are in my legal property, and I'm the author of the pictures. What more can I do?! --Carlomartini86 (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Please use Commons:OTRS for your identity and copyrights ownership confirmation (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and processing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I've just read the page you linked me. It says "When contacting OTRS is unnecessary: I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published (and there is no other copyright involved)." I'm not sure I understood it right (sorry, my english is not so good!), but I don't think I have to do anything more.--Carlomartini86 (talk) 09:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

I think such confirmations is good practice for modern art. Also may be additional proof that there is no impersonations and there are no other copyrights holders (heirs). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

"You think"? In the linked page it's clearly said that it's not necessary, so it's irrelevant that "you think" that it's "a good practice". Furthermore, if you go to these files, you can see the metadata, which demonstrate that I'm the material author of the pictures. I think that facts can give you good assurance about the regularity of the situation. Also, an addictional declaration by me of that to OTRS couldn't add any evidence more of what I'm saying now to you.--Carlomartini86 (talk) 17:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

OTRS could help in case if somebody will claim copyrights ownership over this works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I explained you the situation. I think it's very clear and I think also that the page you linked me it's very clear and it says exactly what I'm saying, so I really can't understand your furious persistence in your personal opinion about what "you think" and what "could help" and what "may be", as you said.--Carlomartini86 (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have anything to add to what I already said. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Please review desost picture

Brimstone-el pacto.jpg You erase this file. I made it speciallly for Wikipedia. I did not take it from Internet. Please repare this situationDesost (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

This is movie poster. Even if you made it itself, who is author of photos used for this poster? Or these are movie screenshots? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Image deleted!

Dear EugeneZelenko,

you deleted uploaded pictures from my Wikipedia-Site NSW-AnImE, so let me ask you: Why???

I´m a member of the NSW-AnImE-Team (as you can see on our website) and I am permitted to use these Pictures, because I asked all artists of this pictures.

So please do not delete these pictures again.

Sincerely

RainbowDashKS

- Technician-

NSW-AnImE - DEIN AnImE-RaDiO

c/o nsw-media - NotenScheune Weddendorf

Niendorfer Chaussee 1

D-39646 Weddendorf

E-Mail: rainbowdashks@nsw-anime.de

Online: http://www.nsw-anime.de

Please ask artists to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review and images undeletion. In case if 3rd party graphics was used, you need to ask permissions from original creators/copyrights holders. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Images deletion

hello Eugene,

you have deleted my photos although i have the complete rights to all of them. i work for the production company Fisherfeatures and all the photos are either photos or articles about the films we've produced and we own to rights to publish all of them. if further proof is need, please tell me and i would clarify them.

thank you very much.

Please ask company legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Eugene, i have some additional photos which are articles from various newspapers concerning our works (reviews of the films, interviews with our director etc). is there a way to upload them being works written by others solely about our works?

thank you

You need to contact authors of articles (and possibly photographers) and ask them to provide permissions too. See Commons:Derivative works for more explanations. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Do i have to send these permissions to Commons or is it enough to notify Commons that i have their permission?

Thanks again

You need to ask authors of articles to send permissions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Danube Excursion vessel, Regensburg.jpg

Hello Eugene!

I have recently nominated this file for deletion because it obviously a private image, a private holyday snapshot. Two users oppose that in the DR. Did our policies change and such files are to be kept nowadays? Your opinion? Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 13:46, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Размещение логотипа компании

Здравствуйте. Я создаю страницу компании Е100 на Википедии. Мы загружали логотип компании и внешний вид карт компании. Но файлы были удалены за отсутствием лицензии. Подскажите как можно корректно загрузить файлы, чтобы их не удаляли. У нас имеется сертификат на регистрацию данного логотипа. Есть скан документа. Надо предоставить его вам или поступить как-то по-другому?

Изображения карт лицензированию не подлежат. Имеем ли мы право разместить эти изображения без указания конкретной лицензии? Если нет, то подскажите какую лицензию нам стоит указать.

С наилучшими пожеланиями, Сергей (E100)

Стандартная процедура: юридический отдел компании должен послать назрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом можно попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением изображений. Только компания должна сознавать, что эти изображения могут быть использованы в любых целях, в том числе и недобросовестными конкурентами. Если это не устраивает, несвободные изображения можно загрузить в разделы, где они допускаются (например, русский). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

RE:User:Gabrielchihonglee-Bot

Thank you for granting me the bot flag, but there is already no pages with the protection template with no protection. So, I will find another job to do. Is there any suggestions?--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 00:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

See Commons:Bots/Work requests. Commons definitely needs bot which will detect files without licenses, add related template and notify uploader. In past bots like User:Nikbot did this job, but they are not active now. You could see how irregularly Category:Media without a license is filled. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/Hazard-Bot 14

Could you please approve this task? --Denniss (talk) 11:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Sorry, I overlooked final call for approval there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Delation

Hi EugeneZelenko, You are trying to delete the image banderín IBO.jpg but the image is from a institute and it has no copyright issued. Thanks! Melodygar (Melodygar)

Somebody created banner design, so there are authorship attached. You need to find a proof that some of rights were released. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Предупреждение об удалении.

Здравствуйте. Помогите пожалуйста правильно оформить файлы. Кадры из фильмов часто оформляются по несвободной лицензии. Покажите пожалуйста пример, как это правильно делается. Последняя группа файлов - совсем не понятно. Пожалуйста, не надо удалять. Помогите отредактировать.

Несвободные файлы сюда загружать нельзя. Можно в проекты, которые их допускают, например, русскую Википедию. Подробности смотрите на w:ru:Википедия:Критерии добросовестного использования.

Остальные загрузки выглядят набором исторических фотографий? Кто фотограф(ы)?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо большое. Теперь ясно. Если фотографов восстановить не удастся, то их тоже загрузить в русскую Википедию? Пока не удаляйте, пожалуйста, я через два дня смогу разобратьсяToskana (talk) 06:24, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Если человек еще жив - то нет, так как возможно сделать свободную альтернативу. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Please advise how to provide the authorship information

Hi Eugene, The wiki page that we created for our Consortium (3D-NET), has been deleted due to copyright issues with the media files we are using. These are the Logo of the consortium (which I created: 3D-NET Logo.jpg) and a microscope-photo that I took myself as well and that has not been published elsewhere. I received your message on my talk site yesterday but I did not have time to send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS as the page had been deleted 3 hours later. When I uploaded these two images I said that I was the owner, and I thought that would suffice. My questions: Can I still send the emails to OTRS and retry my article?. Must I do it for both or only for the logo (I did not get any message for the other mentioned file?) Both files still seem to be on the on the wiki-commons site: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3D-NET_Logo.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hyaloid_vasculature_of_5_dpf_zebrafish_larvae.jpg) Or should I better upload the files again including more this more detailed information about authorship on the upload itself? Can you please advise me on which would be the best way to proceed? There is a lot on information on the Wikipedia users-space and we, first time users are a bit lost… Thank you so much in advance Yolanda (3DNET-IAPP)

If logo copyrights are owned by consortium, you or consortium lawyer need to send permission from consortium official address. If you are owner of copyright, please confirm this via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Please help!

Hi Eugene,

I trully does not understand what is happening with the images I’m uploading and what’s the problema with them. All of them are pictures taken from me –I’m a journalist- I don’t know how can I explain that enough. I am the owner of the copyright. Can you PLEASE help me and guide me in how to indicate THAT once and for all? Is very frustrating to have this problem over and over.

I repeat, I am the copyright owner of the pictures. That’s why I always indicate “own” in the origin. I sincerely don’t know what else to do. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to support your claim of authorship. Are you also author of political party logos? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Vnayak4u repeated copyvio

He's just now uploaded the same copyvio file (already twice deleted) using a different file name. See File:St Paul Logo.jpg (formerly File:644285 501238799911163 738107819 a.jpg and File:Saint paul.png). This is on top of the deleted copyvios listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vnayak4u. Voceditenore (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for spotting problem. I deleted file and left relevant message which I hope will be understood by user. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. The editor in question had created en:St. Paul's Senior Secondary School, Katni. The text was 90% copy paste from the school site, and had to be removed. Another article he created was 100% copypaste. I'm not sure he "gets it". I'll keep an eye on his contributions at WN WP and flag up any further images he attempts to upload here. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 06:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/Gabrielchihonglee-Bot (2)

Hi, Eugene. I would like to have an example of a task oriented edit summaries, also, I am already creating the bot to notify user when their uploads does not have a licence with User:zhuyifei1999's help since I am a starter in pywikibot.--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

You already improved summaries :-)

You could try to contact author of User:Nikbot and borrow code. This bot had one problem: it added one warning message per file, even if user uploaded multiple files without licenses. User talk pages became too big as result. I also notices that User:Jarekt and User:JuTa work recently in same area, but I'm not sure which tools are they using.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi have improved the summary again. Also, about the bot to remind users to add license, User:Zhuyifei1999 will do it since my knowledge of pywikibot is too less. Thanks!--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

You could use wiki-links in edit summaries. As well as spaces instead of underscores :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

I was working a lot with detecting files with no licenses, in last year or two. The uploads without licenses can be detected with CatScan2 or database queries ( files not transcluding {{License template tag}}) and I used VisualFileChanges to tag them with {{No license}} templates and notify the users. Old uploads with no license (some from 2005) were added to Category:Media without a license: needs history check where me, User:JuTa and others processed few thousand files checking file history to see if license was lost (often mistake or vandalism) or never added. Lost licenses were restored and files that never had licenses were tagged with {{No license}}. I was thinking about writing a bot that works on Wikimedia Tool Labs to run daily a query to detect files with no liceses and automatically tag them with {{No license}} or add them to Category:Media without a license: needs history check based on the upload date. However I never figured out how to work with the tool labs. --Jarekt (talk) 03:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm working on it: Commons:Bots/Requests/YiFeiBot (13). See also wikitech:Nova Resource:Tools/Help. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Let my file, please

Please return my picture to my user page. It is my own picture. I am the author. There is not another author. I do not know how to put it again. I can explain all about the picture, but I do not know where do you need the information. Please help me.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Desost

Thanks.Desost (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

If you referring to files mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Desost, you need to read w:en:Help:Table or its equivalent on your native language as well as Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Russian Gravestones

You deleted two of my photos of Russian Gravestones because you think that there is a law in Russia that forbids publication photographs of Russian Gravestones.

By the same logic you must therefore delete:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Markuciai01.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mogila_Puschkina.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chekhov_Anton_grave.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Anton_Chekhov.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Pavel_Yegorovich_Chekhov.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Anton_Chekhov_4.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Anton_Chekhov_3.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Anton_Chekhov_2.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Anton_Chekhov_1.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ChekhovTomb.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tomb_chekhov.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Olga_Knipper-Chekhova.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%9D._%D0%A7%D0%95%D0%A5%D0%9E%D0%92%D0%90.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graves_of_Count_Ilya_Andreyevich_Tolstoy_and_Count_Tolstoy_Oleg_Vladimirovich_IMG_4547.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Novodevicij_Cemetery_Anton_Chekhov.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tolstoy_grave.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yasnaya_Polyana_Tolstoy_Grave.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_LeoTolstoys_son_LeoTolstoy.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:F.I.Tolstoy-Americanets_grave.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FyodorTolstoy_grave.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grave_of_Alexei_Tolstoi.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graf_Tolstoj_op_Jasnaja_Poljana.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%9D.%D0%98._(1758-1818).JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2008-09_Moskau_Friedhof_Crew_TU_144.JPG

Also all of these MUST BE DLETED

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Graves_in_Moscow

and these

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Novodevichy_cemetery_(Moscow)

Please read my response to your identical question at User talk:Jameslwoodward#Russian Gravestones .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Modern Russian Graves Stones

This is a very modern Gravestone

So the photo MUST Be deleted

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Monument_philosopher_A.A._Zinoviev,_in_Novodevichy_Cemetery.JPG

Please read my response to your identical question at User_talk:Jameslwoodward#Modern Russian Graves_Stones. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Trains and Metro photos in Russia

There is still a law in Russia that forbids photographing railway and metro installations but the main page of wikimedia commons today displays a photograph of a Russian electircal locomotive. THIS MUST BE DELETED IT AGAINST THE LAWS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO PHOTOGRAPH A LOCOMOTIVE.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

ALSO ALL PHOTOGRPAHS OF RUSSIAN METRO INSTALLATIONS MUST ALSO BE DELETED: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Metro

Such a restriction fall into the broad category of non-copyright restrictions or "House Rules". Although it may be illegal to take such photographs, the Russian law does not affect their copyright status, so we can host the images. We will usually put a warning tag on them to show that it is possible that they may not be used in Russia. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Jim

Photographs of Russian Railway and Metro installations are photographs of strategic miltary objects. So wikimedia displays photographs of Russian Strategic Military objects,. I know that wikileaks do this sort of thing, but is that really where wikimedia commons wants to be? Is that really what you want to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harveyqs (talk • contribs) 04:49, 5 November 2013‎ (UTC)

Since we allow photographs of similar "strategic military assets' in all other countries, yes, that's really what we want to do. We have thousands, maybe tens of thousands of images of Russian railways. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't think that typical railways photos has any strategic significance. Metro stations typically have distinguished design so Commons:Freedom of panorama applies. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

My wife's father is an officer in the Soviet Army. He told me all about this fact. IThe law exists it is just not enforced. May be stop doing what you think. May be check with lawyers and with the requisite legal codes. I can list plenty of photos of Russian gravestones that are already on wikimedia commons that are less than 70 years old. Yesterday I only listed half. If what you think is true how on earth can a newspaper publish a photograph of Yeltsin's grave without the sculpture's consent? The fact is that they do. How can you find the name and address of the sculpturor to obtain copyright? You cannot.

Moreover, rather than worrying about Russian Gravestones why not concern yourself with real issues. There are photographs of bondage activities on wikimedia commons. There are explicit images of sexual penetration on wikimedia commons. These are not educational at all. You cannot guarantee that all the particpants gave their consent for their images to be published. Above all wikimedia is meant to be open for all and I would not want any children using it.

Also a Russian sculpturor is very unlikely to have the financial means to take a legal action against wikimedia commons for breach of copyright. US legals fees, flights etc would make it too expensive. The Russian Goivenrment has the funds for a legal action.

Also photos like this are not panorama shots and would be perfect for anyone wishing to plan miltary actvities: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Selenga_River_bridge.jpg

Please read Commons:Non-copyright restrictions and Commons:Freedom of panorama. I personally agree with your opinion about explicit photos. Sure, there are many images which violates freedom of panorama which need to be reviewed/deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Andrei Tupolev

Mr Tupolev died in 1972. This is 41 years ago. So his grave cannot be considered "modern".

Please read my response to your identical question at User_talk:Jameslwoodward#Andrei_Tupolev .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Media Player Classic–Home Cinema.png

Hello,
I wonder if it was a right thing to delete that image:

File:Media_Player_Classic_–_Home_Cinema.png

The software was released under a GNU license, and that was correctly mentioned in the Licensing section of the image. And you didn't mention anything about deleting of the image in my talk page either.
Sincerely, Hoikka1 (talk) 14:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Looks like Microsoft software, which are not typically released under free licenses. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Media Player Classic is certainly not a Microsoft software, although it deliberately has the same appereance. This is a GNU software, and it's prominently mentioned in the About window of the player. I re-uploaded the file.Hoikka1 (talk) 12:38, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

It'll be good idea to find out which icons does it use. At least they looks like Microsoft ones. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

No, they are not. They too deliberately look like Microsoft ones (the whole idea of the player is that it looks like Windows Media Player 6.4, but with modern functions and play capabilities), but they are not. When observed closely, the icons differ from the Microsoft ones. The logos of that software are also designed and made by a number of voluntary people, and are not under copyright. Why are you trying to forcibly put me down, by trying to find at least a one little reason to delete that image.Hoikka1 (talk) 04:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

If icons modeled after Microsoft ones it's mean Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Sigh... All right.Hoikka1 (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour

Cathedral of Christ the Saviour has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Halavar (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Lords of Metal logo

Deat Eugene, thanks for your reflection on the file I added to Wikimedia Commons. I am still trying to figure out how stuff works, so if you could help me out a bit, I'd be very grateful... I asked permission from the owner, which he granted me in an e-mail. Is that enough, if I somehow show you that? If so, how can i do that and what permission codes should I have used? I hope to hear from you.--Ravahe (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Please ask owner to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages on another wiki at [[Commons:Bots/Requests/YiFeiBot_(13)#{{{2}}}]]. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please see the diff. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

.png Deletion

Eugene, a couple weeks ago you put my .png images up for deletion because you saw I had similar images saved in .svg format. Unfortunately I never checked my Wikimedia commons account to clarify why I had two copies posted. When I uploaded my images in .svg format (I attempted to use this format because I know it is preferred), they rendered extremely poorly I believe due to the software I used to create them. I attempted to replace them with .png versions, but it would not let me because the formats were different so I uploaded similar images as .png. The chemistry in the .png images was much more clear, and so I uploaded all of the images as .png so as to be consistent on the page I am editing (Bent's Rule).

My hope is that you will undelete the .png images and delete the .svg images. I requested the .svg images be deleted yesterday (here) and the .png images be undeleted here. Please let me know if this is possibility or if you need anything else from me. Thank you. B Levin13 (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Another user, Fastily, deleted the .svg images and undeleted the .png images. I will be careful in the future to not upload duplicate images. B Levin13 (talk) 22:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I think will be good idea if you'll ask help on Commons:Graphics village pump, so SVG problem may be resolved. Vector formats are definitely better then bitmaps. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:EMV ChipCard.jpg deletion

Hi Eugene Zelenko,

This is regarding deleting "File:EMV ChipCard.jpg" I took photo of my credit card, removed personal/sensitive information and uploaded to commons. I am thinking this is not a copyright image and not derived from anybody's work.

Can you please clarify if my understanding is wrong.

Thanks for your voluntary contribution to world's largest & community developed encyclopedia.

Best Regards, RadhaKrishna

Photo of credit card is Commons:Derivative work from card design. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Consecration of Front's Banners-2.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Consecration of Front's Banners-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Palace of Sports-1.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Palace of Sports-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-East-1 Residential Area-3.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-East-1 Residential Area-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-BSU-Entrance into Main Building from Park.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-BSU-Entrance into Main Building from Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Opera and Ballet Theatre-2.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Opera and Ballet Theatre-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-BNTU-2.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-BNTU-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Hotel Svislach.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Hotel Svislach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-October Cinema-1.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-October Cinema-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Central Post Office.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Central Post Office.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Children Railroad-2.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Children Railroad-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Belarusfilm.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Belarusfilm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Old Railway Station.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Old Railway Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Belarus-Minsk-Airport Minsk-1 (2).jpg

And also:

• File:Belarus-Minsk-Airport Minsk-1.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Belarus-Minsk-Minsk Tractor Works-1.jpg

And also:

• File:Belarus-Minsk-Minsk Tractor Works-2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Textbausteine

Bitte höre auf Textbausteine auf meiner Diskussionsseite abzuwerfen. Ich habe den Hinweis beim ersten Mal schon verstanden und alle meine Dateien enthalten mindestens eine Kategorie. I can repeat this in english if necessary. --Hinnerk11 (talk) 22:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know German :-( Please translate. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:23, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I asked to stop dropping off text modules concerning catigorization on my discussion page. I understood them the first time and my uploads always contain at least one category. --Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Somehow I encountered files you uploaded in subcategories of Category:Media needing categories. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

I just noticed that the German Upload Assistent for WLM 2013 seems to supply two categories for all my pictures. The first one is Cultural Heritage Monument in XY and the second one is unexplicably Category:Media needing categories.--Hinnerk11 (talk) 23:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

I think much more precise categories could be found. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

You might be right, but the system of categories is greek to me. --Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

You could explore category dedicated to particular city/town. Quite a lot of them has Buildings in subcategories where you likely could encounter specific category for distinguished building (like church, town hall, etc.). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, again.

Hello, I don't know if you remember me as I last talked to you under the name User:Arsenalkid700 back in July 2012. Anyway, back then I was completly a novice at posting pictures on wikimedia and today I am... well... the same. That is why I am here. Currently I am trying to upload pictures of footballers from India and I finally managed to get in contact with the admin of a football blog in India who says he does give me permission to use the pictures on his blog for wikipedia. Now, I need to know the best/easiest to get through this. Last time I did this and I got permission via email it did not work because the license was not correct. Basically what I am saying is... I just want to upload pictures, I have permission, how do I upload that persons pictures, give him credit for them, and not have a massive hassel. That would be great and I look forward to hearing from you. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 04:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Please ask this person to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Please note that permissions could be given only for own works or if copyrights were properly transferred. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay, that I can actually work with but would this count for all the pictures he has or just the one I want to upload? Will I need to go through this with every picture of his that I upload? Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 04:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

It depends on permission. If permission will be for specific file(s) - you could apply it only for that file(s). If it'll cover all files - you could use it for all files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hm, okay then. Let me try and see what happens then. Thanks mate. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 01:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Obnovenie zmazaných súborov : Fragmenthea_-_2000_(demo_CD).jpg a ďalších

Dobrý deň,

žiadam Vás,ako poverená a oprávnená osoba o vrátenie vami zmazaného obsahu a overenie a schválenie uverejnenia nasledujúcich diel po prečítaní vami požadovaného čestného prehlásenia o autorstve.

Týmto vyhlasujem, že som tvorcom a/alebo jediným držiteľom autorských práv DIEL:

https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BAbor:Full_cover_-_Instrumental_Emotions_demo_MC_1996.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Instrumental_Emotions_-_1996_demo_MC.jpg https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BAbor:AESTUUM_II._-_1998_demo_MC.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fragmenthea_-_2000_(demo_CD).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Symmetry_2002.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fragmenthea_2005.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Pantomime_in_Neosolium_-_2008_CD.jpg

Súhlasím so zverejnením týchto diel za podmienok slobodnej licencie Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported [

]. Beriem na vedomie, že udeľujem komukoľvek používať

dielo v komerčnom produkte a modifikovať ho podľa svojich predstáv. Som si vedomý, že vždy ostávam držiteľom autorských práv na svoje dielo a nechávam si právo byť uvedený ako autor v súlade so zvolenou licenciou. Zmeny, ktoré urobia iní, nebudú pripisované mne. Som si vedomý, že slobodná licencia sa týka iba autorského práva a vyhradzujem si možnosť zakročiť proti každému, kto použije dielo urážlivým spôsobom alebo poruší osobnostné práva, obmedzenia týkajúce sa obchodnej značky atď. Beriem na vedomie, že tento súhlas je neodvolateľný a že obrázok môže a nemusí byť permanentne umiestnený na projekte Wikimedia. 18.11.2013

V prípade nejasností ma kontaktujte ako zástupcu pre túto záležitosť povereného zastupovaním kapely Abstract - Copyright (c) 2013 ABSTRACT.

address: Moskovská 25, 974 04 Banska Bystrica, Slovakia / Europe e-mail : abstractsk@yahoo.com

S pozdravom:

               Peter Lengsfeld

Sorry, my Slovak is not perfect :-( Please ask band to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Удаление старых вариантов одного и того же файла

Привет EugeneZelenko,

Мне нужно очистить историю файла - File:The flag of Lak people, Gazi-Kumukh..png и оставить только последний текущий файл, загруженный 21:04, 19 ноября 2013 , как там написано. Vachinets (talk) 04:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Сделано. Не помешало бы и переименовать - в названии файла лишняя точка. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Большое спасибо. EugeneZelenko, я отправил запрос на переименование этого файла на правильное обобщенное имя. На странице https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lak_people_(Dagestan) есть файлы которые я загрузил, но сейчас мне надо их удалить, так как эти файлы изображают не нужные изображения флага лакцев, эти файлы не должны существовать и они должны были быть в истории этого самого моего файла, который ты обработал. Этот файл который я хочу переименовать есть единственный вариант флага лакцев, который необходимо оставить.

Эти файлы которые мне нужно полностью удалить:

File:Lak flag, Lakia, Gazi-Kumukh.jpg File:Lakia-Gazi-Kumukh.jpg File:The flag of Lak people, Gazikumukh State.jpg(этот файл по моему используется, но пусть они используют тот последний вариант флага, сами найдут) File:Лакия, Лакцы, Гази-Кумух.jpg

На этом всё. Vachinets (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Удалил неиспользованные. Используемый надо заменить, но у меня пока времени в обрез :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо. Я решил переименовать этот файл File:The flag of Lak people, Gazikumukh State.jpg, но потом понял что мне все равно надо удалить этот файл, или как ты сказал, заменить на тот последний вариант флага. Vachinets (talk) 04:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Только что я заменил этот файл на тот последний мой флаг. Так что этот файл File:The flag of Lak people, Gazikumukh State.jpg больше не используется и можно удалять. Vachinets (talk) 04:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо. Я извиняюсь, наверное это уже надоело, но мне нужно удалить этот самый вариант флага еще раз: Файл:Gazi-Kumukh-Flag.jpg, нашел на google search, видимо я забыл про него, думаю это последний файл для удаления. Vachinets (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Этот файл загружен в русскую Википедию, где у меня нет прав администратора. Вам надо связаться с кем-то из местных администраторов. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Привет. я нашел еще один файл на удаление, на английской вики это последний файл, я проверил: File:The flag of Gazikumukh.jpg. Vachinets (talk) 12:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Удалил. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Username change question

Hello Eugene- I see that you sometimes work on name changes. Could you do me a favor and tell me if I've approached this request properly? Thanks in advance for any tips. --Eric ^{my en.wp talk page} 18:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't think it's good idea to usurp accounts with common names. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Eugene- Thanks for getting back to me. Sorry, I don't understand what you mean about common names. --Eric ^{my en.wp talk page} 03:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Eric is definitely quite regular male name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

I see now that you mean it's a commonly heard name. Thanks for getting back to me--just wanted to check with you. --Eric ^{my en.wp talk page} 16:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Eugene- Sorry to bother you with this again. I have received the consent of the target account holder, and there is another bureaucrat who is willing to re-assign the account to me, but he wanted me to check with you first. Thanks. --Eric ^{my en.wp talk page} 12:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

In past I recommended to usurp accounts everywhere before Commons usurpation in such cases. Early this year there was changes in policies to usurp name on pure number of contributions ground because of SUL unification, but I'm personally not fan of such measures. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Eugene,

I don't have a problem with carrying out this request, but I don't wish to forcefully overrule you, as you're far more active than I am. Since the target user has consented and the requesting user has the name on his home project(s), it seems reasonable to allow it in this case. I will defer to you, but I think it makes sense. Thoughts? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

If you feel it's OK to rename, please do it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

The files I want to delete are the ones uploaded September 30, 2013. I renamed the files and changed the size and send the new ones November 22 and October 1. I hereby affirm that I, Robitsju, am the sole owner of the files uploaded by me. They are: pictures, copies of portraits, books and a camera made by my father Leo Arthur Robitschek (1893-1981). I want to use them in a biography I will introduce in the future in Wikipedia.

Please use Commons:OTRS for this confirmation. Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with its review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Почему был удален логотип Арт студии Пионер?

Почему был удален логотип Арт студии Пионер? Какие права были нарушены? Ведь Википедия является энциклопедией, а не коммерческой организацией. Прошу доходчиво пояснить и пересмотреть решение.

Логотип Браузерной игры "Сказка"

Почему вы удалили данный файл? Его загрузка,для статьи об игре, одобрена разработчиком