User talk:Ermell/Archive/2022

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz Luftbild-20210926-RM-111015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz Luftbild-20210926-RM-110934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz Feldkapelle Luftbild-20210926-RM-111727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senftenbergkapelle Luftbild-20210926-RM-120109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 10:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senftenbergkapelle Luftbild-20210926-RM-115839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 10:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Residenzschloss (BW) -20140327-RM-161050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Residenzschloss (BW) -20140327-RM-160801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Residenzschloss (BW) -20140327-RM-160029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Dreieinigkeitskirche -20140327-RM-162400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I think good --Mike1979 Russia 12:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pettstadt Mariae Geburt Decke-20211128-RM-151941.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pettstadt Mariae Geburt Decke-20211128-RM-151941.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz Feldkapelle Luftbild-20210926-RM-111555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernstein Schloss Erker-20200927-RM-161240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernstein Backhaus-20200927-RM-160225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenzschloss Ludwigsburg (BW) Innenraum Wandbild-20140327-RM-154240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)  Question I agree. It would be nice to have a bit more information though, such as the name of the painter (and/or maybe the name of the room in this large castle). -- Martinus KE 15:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC) Comment That is correct, but I could not find out from my data in which room this is and unfortunately also not who painted it. Maybe other users can answer this question.--Ermell 20:53, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernstein Schlosshof-20200927-RM-160649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senftenbergkapelle Georgiritt-20140421-RM-100313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Prburley 18:23, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escherndorf Gasthaus Mainaussicht-20201025-RM-114510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt Baustelle Ballast leveller-20210925-RM-152740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Schlossgarten-20140327-RM-160231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schotterplaniermaschine Unteroberndorf Baustelle Weiss-20160628-RM-110519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing CAT D6N LGP im Wasser-20160831-RM-110310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veitlahm Wohnhaus-20200927-RM-163746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veitlahm Schuppen-20200927-RM-163830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments there are some chromatic aberations --Christian Ferrer 10:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. --Ermell 23:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 07:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Zentralbrunnen Schloss -20140327-RM-160552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Polystichum setiferum-20210427-RM-165358.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polystichum setiferum-20210427-RM-165358.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käserei Bayreuth Scania Kesselwagen-20150419-RM-111550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenzschloss Ludwigsburg (BW)-20140327-RM-160708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahnensaal Residenzschloss Ludwigsburg (BW)-20140327-RM-151903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönfeld Kirche Kriegerdenkmal-20210524-RM-160941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlammersdorf Kirche Luftbild-20211002-RM-162518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot of 2021

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - November - Top views of vehicles/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Bamberg MD Kanal Sportboot-20210603-RM-154723.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Top views of vehicles, in November 2021. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:04, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Baotu Spring bell-20150519-RM-182601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:32, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Baotu Spring bell-20150519-RM-182601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Baotu Spring roofs-20150519-RM-165120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountain of One Thousand Buddhas-20150520-RM-110702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountain of one thousand Buddhas Love Locks-20150520-RM-104601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountain of One Thousand Buddhas Stone Elephant-20150520-RM-114144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinanxi station at night-20150519-RM-214649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Baotu Spring pond-20150519-RM-174132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Baotu Spring pond-20150519-RM-174750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Baotu Spring roof-20150519-RM-165354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Thousand Buddhas Monastery Incense -20150520-RM-101936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebherr LRB 355 Hölzla-20160628-RM-105526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Baotu Spring-20150519-RM-165055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan scooter-20150519-RM-184932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountain of one thousand Buddhas Love Locks-20150520-RM-104429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Geschäft Gemüse Auslagen-20150516-RM-114604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, though I don't find it very attractive :-) --Tagooty 16:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Gasse-20150516-RM-114217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Categories

Hi Ermell

Ich muss sagen so wie du Kategorien anlegst (z.B. Category:Street markets in Shanghai), ist von solchen Kategorien keinerlei Mehrwert. Da ist es besser, sich die Zeit und Mühe zu sparen.

MfG --A.Savin 13:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi A.Savin, die vergessenen Klammern schienen mir der Grund für deinen Hinweis zu sein. Dass sich bei den Kategorien die Katze in den Schwanz beißt ist mir nicht aufgefallen habe ich aber jetzt geändert. Die "Street market" Kategorie habe ich weggelassen und dafür die vorhandene "Outdoor markets" verwendet. Eindeutige Aussagen deinerseits könnten auch eine Menge Zeit sparen. Beste Grüße --Ermell (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemmern Abbruch Brücke A70 -20210116-RM-104908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Thousand Buddhas Tempel-20150520-RM-103406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Thousand Buddhas Monastery Incense -20150520-RM-103535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Guwenhua Jie-20150522-RM-121846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Guwenhua Jie-20150522-RM-121902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Jushilin-20150522-RM-113555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Jushilin-20150522-RM-113630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Jushilin-20150522-RM-113923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Prburley 15:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai White cloud Temple -20150518-RM-104731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai White cloud Temple Bell -20150518-RM-105205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Ninghai Road-20150518-RM-102846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Guwenhua Jie-20150522-RM-120620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Jushilin-20150522-RM-113852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai hot pots-20150518-RM-102531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Geschäft Gemüse Auslagen-20150516-RM-114614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Gasse-20150516-RM-114221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai fish restaurant-20150518-RM-102658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Thousand Buddhas Gate-20150520-RM-103447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street Bonsai-20150522-RM-105000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street shop-20150522-RM-110829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street-20150522-RM-112015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai White cloud Temple -20150518-RM-105418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (I've fixed a typo in the description.) --Lion-hearted85 20:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemmendorf Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-154156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemmendorf Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-154128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemmendorf Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senftenbergkapelle Georgiritt Prozession-20140421-RM-094153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senftenbergkapelle Georgiritt Prozession-20140421-RM-094725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Markt Gemüse Auslagen-20150516-RM-114620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Itzgrund Luftbild-20220109-RM-153823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-154205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemmendorf Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Markt Fisch Auslagen-20150516-RM-115200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street-20150522-RM-111834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Jushilin-20150522-RM-113239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street shop-20150522-RM-110924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street-20150522-RM-111325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai White cloud Temple -20150518-RM-104948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemmendorf Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Jushilin-20150522-RM-113217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bottom is cropped, can you fix that? --Poco a poco 09:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 10:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Decke-20210321-RM-161740.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Decke-20210321-RM-161740.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! China Tianjin 5227506 7 8N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapporo Botanic Garden bridge-20091014-RM-105903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapporo Botanic Garden-20091014-RM-105621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapporo Botanic Garden-20091014-RM-111329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapporo Botanic Garden-20091014-RM-114004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapporo Botanic Garden-20091014-RM-113937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemmendorf Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Hongqiao Station-20150519-RM-110424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 14:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! China Beijing Haircut 1230674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting picture, good quality. --DimiTalen 12:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! China-wheelbarrows-Beijing-1230830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itzgrund Hochwasser Luftbild-20220109-RM-153331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kokardenblume (Gaillardia aristata) Raureif-20211221-RM-105242.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kokardenblume (Gaillardia aristata) Raureif-20211221-RM-105242.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum Garten-20091020-RM-112901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum Garten-20091020-RM-113550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum Gong-20091020-RM-111948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum Laterne-20091020-RM-113122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments }  Support Good quality.The perspective might need a small correction--Horst J. Meuter 10:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Shun Chao Long Restaurant-20110102-RM-205645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple-20150517-RM-095412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Five dragon Pavilon-20110104-RM-112338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really nice. -- Ikan Kekek 11:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Western Paradise-20110104-RM-111034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good one. -- Ikan Kekek 11:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Western Paradise-20110104-RM-111133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 11:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking CCTV Tower Yuyuantan-20131230-RM-121350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Obsttorte grün-20091020-RM-101338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapporo Botanic Garden bridge-20091014-RM-105840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum Garten-20091020-RM-114344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum Garten-20091020-RM-115433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum Garten-20091020-RM-114406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nezu Museum-20091020-RM-105926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Vase-20110104-RM-113150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street Statue-20150522-RM-103039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Nankai district Laternen-20150522-RM-104415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Nankai district Gasse-20150522-RM-104527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)  Comment Very good series! This one in particular looks like a pretty strong FPC candidate, and I may nominate it soon if you don't. A couple of the others look possible as FP candidates, too. -- Ikan Kekek 11:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altenbanz Kreuzstein-20160918-RM-170658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großheirat Grabstein-20160918-RM-173734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 15:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großheirat Kriegerdenkmal-20160918-RM-173554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altenbanz St.Laurentius Tür-20160918-RM-170727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Seventeen Arch Bridge-20071020-RM-122654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Longevity Hill-20071020-RM-121319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Seventeen Arch Bridge-20071020-RM-123138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Fähre-20071020-RM-121328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Jetzt holst du die alten Bilder heraus. --Milseburg 12:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Bühne-20110104-RM-113434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Chanfu Temple-20110104-RM-112552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Five dragon Pavilion-20110104-RM-112455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Five dragon Pavilion-20110104-RM-112233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 14:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Five dragon Pavilion-20110104-RM-110807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 14:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großheirat Schmiede-20160918-RM-173914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Himmelstempel Park Tore-20110103-RM-155715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf Hochwasser-20220106-RM-152904-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf Hochwasser-20220106-RM-152945-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 22:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf Hochwasser-20220106-RM-153039-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf Hochwasser-20220106-RM-154010-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Tianhou Palace Brunnen-20150522-RM-122937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Hexi district-20150521-RM-164147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple-20150517-RM-102633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple-20150517-RM-100557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple Bonsai-20150517-RM-094900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple Bonsai-20150517-RM-094816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Quan Ju De He Ping Men Roast Duck Restaurant-20110102-RM-192114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Jin Zheng Yang Restaurant-20110102-RM-205758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fu Hua Mansion Beijing-20071020-RM-150934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. If it were a little sharper, I'd support this for FP, but I'm sure this was the best you could do in 2007. -- Ikan Kekek 09:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Fahrradkurier -20071020-RM-145806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Confucius Tempel-20071022-RM-093024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Gulou East Street-20150522-RM-110551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Unteroberndorf ABS Nürnberg-Ebensfeld Betonarbeiter-20160622-RM-085134.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Unteroberndorf ABS Nürnberg-Ebensfeld Betonarbeiter-20160622-RM-085134.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-104432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Nankai district Gasse-20150522-RM-104117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Nankai district Innenhof-20150522-RM-103235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Tianhou Palace Räucherstäbchen-20150522-RM-123531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-105142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Fähre-20071020-RM-121209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Fähre-20071020-RM-122357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-104408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street Brücke-20071020-RM-105547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Confucius Tempel-20071022-RM-091902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Confucius Tempel-20071022-RM-092155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Confucius Tempel-20071022-RM-092337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Confucius Tempel-20071022-RM-092411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Jonghe Tempel -20071022-RM-094926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Phyllostachys Aureosulcata 'Spectabilis -20200524-RM-073500.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phyllostachys Aureosulcata 'Spectabilis -20200524-RM-073500.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Motoroller elektrisch-20071021-RM-090216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Radfahrer-20071021-RM-085345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Radfahrer-20071021-RM-090349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Radfahrer-20071021-RM-090407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Five dragon Pavilions-20110104-RM-110237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking CCTV Tower Yuyuantan-20131230-RM-121424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. Sensor spots lower left, right middle. --Tagooty 09:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC) Done I found some more and hope i got them all. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 09:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:13, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Geschäft Shichahai Subdistrict-20131231-RM-112827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:11, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Himmelstempel Park Tore-20110103-RM-155648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Interconti Financal Street-20131230-RM-134851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Jonghe Tempel -20071022-RM-093428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Jonghe Tempel -20071022-RM-093954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Konfuzius Tempel -20071022-RM-091826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 11:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Mausoleum Mao Zedong-20110102-RM-210354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but right part is hanging a little bit to the right --Michielverbeek 09:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Done Tried to fix. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 22:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Zhuanlunzang Pavillon Dach-20071020-RM-101001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 20:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wichsenstein Luftbild -20210703-RM-170115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deckengemälde im Kaisersaal von Kloster Ebrach-20070708-RM-152208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escherndorf-20201025-RM-104327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 09:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Radfahrer-20071020-RM-152113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Xiuyi Bridge-20071020-RM-125534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 09:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Tempel Tür-20071020-RM-084005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-104437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-104405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Musiker-20071020-RM-090732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escherndorf-20201025-RM-110723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment May need a tilt and perspective correction. --Ximonic 15:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 23:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Thanks! Good quality. --Ximonic 18:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

WLF 22 • Frage

Hallo Reinhold,

schön, dass Du auch wieder an der Wiki Loves Folklore-Jury teilnimmst! Ich hoffe, dass wir wieder wie letztes Jahr schöne Bilder heraussuchen können. Bis jetzt gibt es noch nicht sooo viele Einreichungen, aber es sind ordentliche Bilder darunter.

Kennst Du ganz zufällig jemanden, der sich auf Commons um Nachfragen bei Urheberrechtsfragen usw. kümmert? Wir haben eine Reihe von interessanten Fotos dabei: [1], die auch im Netz zu finden sind [2]. Da für das Hochladen dasselbe Kürzel „Wirold“ benutzt wurde wie für die Website, hoffe ich, dass der Fotograf selbst die Bilder bei uns hochgeladen hat. Dann wäre alles bestens. Aber das ist natürlich nicht sicher, daher sollte jemand, der sich mit dem korrekten Vorgehen auskennt, den Hochlader kontaktieren und um eine Bestätigung dafür bitten, dass er das Urheberrrecht hat. Ich möchte das aber nicht einfach dem Volunteer Response Team melden, da ich nicht möchte, dass der Hochlader zu förmlich oder gar unhöflich behandelt wird – denn wenn er wirklich der Fotograf ist, sollten wir ihn ja nicht vergraulen, sondern ihn ermuntern, noch mehr Bilder zu Commons beizutragen ;–). Daher meine Frage, ob Du vielleicht jemanden kennst, der sich mit diesen Urheberrechts-Klärungen auskennt und das nötige Fingerspitzengefühl hat …

Auf jeden Fall herzliche Grüße und einen schönen Spät-Winter! Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Roman,

ich finde es auch schön das du wieder mit dabei bist. Bezüglich deiner Frage zum Urheberrecht muß ich leider passen bzw kenne ich nur den Lukas Mezger https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Gnom der für juristische Fragen zuständig ist aber ob auch in diesem Fall weiß ich leider nicht.

Beste Grüße von Reinhold Ermell (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Reinhold! Vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. Macht nichts, ich dachte einfach nur, ich frage mal – manchmal kennt ja jemand jemanden, der jemanden kennt … usw. ;–). Ich werde ggf. doch mal die OTRS-Leute kontaktieren. Herzliche Grüße von Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Love your work!

Dimitrijemat (talk) 05:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Zhuanlunzang Pavillon-20071020-RM-100802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Longivity Hill-20071020-RM-091840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Longevity Hill Treppe-20071020-RM-100745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Kunming Lake-20071020-RM-101124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Kunming Lake-20071020-RM-101049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrweisach-20170910-RM-150812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 09:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senftenbergkapelle Georgiritt-20140421-RM-094950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Obsttorte Modell-20091020-RM-101223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 09:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Obsttorte Modell-20091020-RM-101431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 09:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Seventeen Arch Bridge-20071020-RM-123108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Second Ring Raod-20131231-RM-113755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 15:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking birds Pet shop-20131231-RM-110101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking birds Pet shop-20131231-RM-110137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Nankai district Zimmer-20150522-RM-103741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Tempel Shiba Park-20091017-RM-110904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Tempel Shiba Park-20091017-RM-110823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Dach-20071020-RM-084611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Nankai district Zimmer-20150522-RM-103734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin Nankai district Zimmer-20150522-RM-103739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf Hochwasser-20220106-RM-153332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weingarten Orgel-20130516-RM-140424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not quite an FP to me but beautiful and definitely a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 09:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf Luftbild-20220212-RM-161608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf Luftbild Turmuhr-20220212-RM-160616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf Kirche Luftbild-20220212-RM-160219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf Kirche Luftbild-20220212-RM-160103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Shibarikyū-Park Laterne-20091017-RM-121516.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 10:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Shibarikyū-Park Latern-20091017-RM-121808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 09:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Schirm Bank-20091017-RM-105445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Schirm Bank-20091017-RM-105925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf Kirche Luftbild-20220212-RM-160401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf Luftbild-20220212-RM-160249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handthal Luftbild-20220213-RM-162401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 10:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfingsttreffen Puetnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten (1X7A2463).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-115814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf Hochwasser Fussballtor-20220106-RM-154135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchschletten Luftaufnahme-20210601-RM-172717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgruine Stollburg-20220213-RM-162018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eichenhof Bauernhaus-20151108-RM-153041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Pont Neuf Schiffe-20140602-RM-215526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Palauenc05 09:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jinan Tempel Dach-20150520-RM-103225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Lmbuga 12:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handthal Luftbild-20220213-RM-162444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality.--Lmbuga 12:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Grandiose technisch perfekt und cool inszenierte Bilder!!

Erstklassig, vielen Dank. Sollten wirklich nicht nur auf der Festplatte bleiben. Nehme einige Bilder unter anderem von Eggolsheim für ein Buch über Fränkische Schweiz und Coburger Land und würde dir ein Belegexemplar zuschicken. Autorennennung ist selbstverständlich. Die Bilder werden nicht bearbeitet, manchmal würde es sich aber anbieten, sie zu beschneiden. Würdest du das genehmigen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noeveon (talk • contribs) 20:30, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Blumen, freut mich wenn die Bilder gefallen. Belegexemplare nehme ich immer gerne. Die Bilder dürfen im Rahmen der Lizenz bearbeitet werden. Gruß von --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebrach Kloster Treppenhaus Deckenfresco-20070708-RM-132435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franziskanerkirche Luzern Altar-20130829-RM-114203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern Jesuitenkirche Posaunenengel-20130902-RM-095339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern Jesuitenkirche Posaunenengel-20130902-RM-095251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern Jesuitenkirche organ-20130902-RM-095242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Try as FP candidate --George Chernilevsky 10:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)  Comment Some parts should probably be sharper for FP. -- Ikan Kekek 18:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danzig -20070402-RM-090528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 15:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danzig Zeughaus Fassade-20070402-RM-082714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:49, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danzig Rathaus-20070402-RM-090339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danzig Hafen-20070402-RM-074612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danzig Goldenes Haus-20070401-RM-172651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Gdańsk-20070402-RM-074628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-115527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. -- Ikan Kekek 18:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-112203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-112341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Grosse Mauer-20071019-RM-114405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kriegerdenkmal-20220220-RM-164735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Rathaus-20220220-RM-165003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf St. Oswald und Martin-20220220-RM-163824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Bauernhaus-20220220-RM-164445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf St. Oswald und Martin Sonnenuhr-20220220-RM-164204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-112810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-115804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Hyde Park riders-20130715-RM-130028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büchelberg Wegkapelle-20070304-RM-105205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kriegerdenkmal-20220220-RM-164354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebrach Kloster Treppenhaus-20070708-RM-132609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)  Support good quality --Matutinho

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Grosse Mauer-20071019-RM-115708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danzig Marienkirche-20070402-RM-074350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-113742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf St. Oswald und Martin Figuren-20220220-RM-163039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiersdorf Evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche St. Nikolaus Altar-20220220-RM-154045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiersdorf Evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche St. Nikolaus Orgel-20220220-RM-152918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiersdorf Evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche St. Nikolaus-20220220-RM-154554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ximonic 23:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kirche Decke-20220220-RM-161449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kirche Innen -20220220-RM-160709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kirche Orgel -20220220-RM-161925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Steindy 23:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kirche Innen-20220220-RM-161042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 14:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf St. Oswald und Martin Taufstein-20220220-RM-162432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Great Wall-20071019-RM-115933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 14:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiersdorf Evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche St. Nikolaus Altar-20220220-RM-152056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 14:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kirche Wappen-20220220-RM-161619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Dong'anmen Dajie-20071019-RM-212057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Dong'anmen Dajie-20071019-RM-211930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very delicious. --Palauenc05 09:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Hyde Park Blue Heron-20130715-RM-125105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Lmbuga 12:26, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokio Hamarikyu-Garten-20091017-RM-142657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.  Support I don't know who forget the signature, but the photograph is IMO acceptable for QI too. --XRay 10:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Fischzucht Luftaufnahme-20220227-RM-161115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Fischzucht Luftaufnahme-20220227-RM-161219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Fischzucht Luftaufnahme-20220227-RM-161410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Fischtreppe Luftaufnahme-20220227-RM-161502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Fischzucht Luftaufnahme-20220227-RM-160943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Dong'anmen Dajie-20071019-RM-212423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Department Store-20071019-RM-213355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Hohenstein Turm Oberfranken-20070316-RM-101624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vang Stabkirche Eingang-20130509-RM-154728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 14:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untersiemau Schloss-20070316-RM-094239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichmannsdorf Wegkapelle-20070304-RM-111335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vang Stabkirche-20130509-RM-155606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Fischzucht Luftaufnahme-20220227-RM-161129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 09:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Ahorn-20070316-RM-105137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 12:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC) In which way? The castle is not straight at all. --Ermell 22:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)  Support. Some vertical line may not be straight, but almost all others are. clearly QI. Good quality--Lmbuga 16:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vang Stabkirche Friedhof-20130509-RM-155408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 11:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vang Stabkirche Aussichtsplatform-20130509-RM-155014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 09:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsmühle Leinleiter-20070325-RM-133839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 09:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vang Stabkirche Friedhof-20130509-RM-155431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - January - Big equipment/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Liebherr LRB 355 Hölzla-20160628-RM-105526.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Big equipment, in January 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wasserkraftwerk Fischtreppe-20220304-RM-112002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wasserkraftwerk Wehr-20220304-RM-111713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 13:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Main-20220304-RM-112052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 13:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wasserkraftwerk Wehr-20220304-RM-111808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wasserkraftwerk-20220304-RM-111634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 13:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Basilika Südturm Spitze Luftbild-20220304-RM-115814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Basilika Südturm Spitze Luftbild-20220304-RM-115747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsmühle Mühlrad-20070325-RM-134651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsmühle Leinleiter-20070325-RM-134018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wasserkraftwerk-20220304-RM-111445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wasserkraftwerk Wehr-20220304-RM-111826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forchheim Luftbild-20220303-RM-170724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burk Dreikönigskirche-20220303-RM-170421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 11:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Basilika-20220304-RM-113739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 11:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Basilika Luftbild-20220304-RM-115017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 11:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vang Stabkirche Friedhof-20130509-RM-155157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 11:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sesslach Kirche-20070311-RM-154529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vang Stabkirche-20130509-RM-154253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelkron Rathaus-20220306-RM-170710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neidenstein Ruine-20070325-RM-154052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsbach Kirche Luftbild-20220303-RM-155325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wehr Fischtreppe-20121021-RM-161739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Perhaps a bit blueish--Lmbuga 14:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forchheim Luftbild-20220303-RM-170717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments br /> Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 14:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Dong'anmen Dajie-20071019-RM-212121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Dong'anmen Dajie-20071019-RM-211916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bamberg Ottokirche Luftbild-20211031-RM-115941.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bamberg Ottokirche Luftbild-20211031-RM-120034.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himelkron Kirche Goekel Epithaph-20220306-RM-164612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelkron Kirche Orgel HDR-20220306-RM-164826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelkron Kirche Taufstein-20220306-RM-165424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelkron Kirche Innen-20220306-RM-162828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelkron Kirche Innen-20220306-RM-163133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetzelsdorf Turmuhr Luftbild-20220309-RM-161150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)  Support good quality --Matutinho 19:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetzelsdorf Pretzfeld Luftbild-20220309-RM-160447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetzelsdorf Kirche Luftbild-20220309-RM-160803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetzelsdorf Kirche Luftbild-20220309-RM-160328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetzelsdorf Wetterhahn Luftbild-20220309-RM-161005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Fischzucht Luftaufnahme-20220227-RM-161021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 11:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen Wehr Kraftwerk-20160922-RM-110402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 11:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Basilika Luftbild-20220304-RM-115153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 11:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klosterkirche Himmelkron-20220306-RM-170844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge (Hemipholiota populnea)-20201204-RM-154343.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge (Hemipholiota populnea)-20201204-RM-154343.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiersdorf katholische Kirche Luftaunahme-20220303-RM-164642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burk Dreikönigskirche Wetterfahne-20220303-RM-170656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsbach Kirche Luftbild-20220303-RM-155309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsbach Turmuhr-20220303-RM-155528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhrendorf Kriegerdenkmal-20220220-RM-164337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himelkron Kirche Epithaph-20220306-RM-170200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himelkron Kirche Epithaph-20220306-RM-170112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelkron Kirche Grabplatte-20220306-RM-165902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelkron Kirche Wappen-20220306-RM-164449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himelkron Kirche Epithaph-20220306-RM-170014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sibirische Sumpfschwertlilie (Iris sibirica)-20200603-RM-100257.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sibirische Sumpfschwertlilie (Iris sibirica)-20200603-RM-100257.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-111704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. That's all only one building? -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-104850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-104800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Fähre-20071020-RM-120733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-112235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen St. Wolfgang Luftbild-20220303-RM-162733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen St. Wolfgang Luftbild-20220303-RM-162829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen St. Wolfgang Luftbild Turmkreuz-20220303-RM-163053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsbach St. Michael Wetterhahn-20220303-RM-155655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-110821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Luftbild-20220320-RM-163408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very nice. --Tournasol7 15:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auditorium of the Great Hall of the People-20131231-RM-192738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen St. Wolfgang Luftbild Uhr-20220303-RM-163027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Five dragon Pavilon-20110104-RM-112315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-111208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Sommerpalast Suzhou Street-20071020-RM-111733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park White Pagoda-20110104-RM-105854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tianjin city panorama-20150523-RM-100530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Luftbild-20220313-RM-162908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone coronaria focus stack-20220320-RM-144602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsbach Luftbild-20220303-RM-160746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsbach Luftbild-20220303-RM-160642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßtal Luftbild-20220313-RM-162435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 11:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Dong'anmen Dajie-20071019-RM-212636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Himmelstempel Tor-20110103-RM-155055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Himmelstempel-20110103-RM-155538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Küche Lastenfahrrad-20110104-RM-101708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseß Luftbild-20220320-RM-163904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edinburgh Scottish Parliament-20110902-RM-155721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Brücke-20110104-RM-105624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 19:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Brücke-20110104-RM-110001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 19:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Thurn Luftbild-20220303-RM-160852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Tür-20110104-RM-105040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Strand Hütte-20080502-RM-162844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Thurn Luftbild-20220303-RM-160830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Wohnung-20110104-RM-101858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseß Luftbild-20220320-RM-163823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 15:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Himmelstempel-20110103-RM-155421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anemone coronaria focus stack-20220320-RM-144602.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anemone coronaria focus stack-20220320-RM-144602.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Parlament-20090730-RM-110352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Boot Strand Hühner-20080502-RM-143815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Boot Strand-20080502-RM-163111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Strand-20080502-RM-143931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Strand-20080502-RM-162804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Praia da Enseada-20080502-RM-103457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiersdorf Evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche St. Nikolaus Orgel-20220220-RM-153451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizontal perspective distortion perspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 08:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) Which reference lines do you recommend --Ermell 20:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)  Answered The horizontal perspective at the railing is distorted (please see annotation). --F. Riedelio 10:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC) In my opinion, the gallery is crooked. The organ behind it is straight. --Ermell 22:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC) @Ermell: I have uploaded a new version in which I have corrected the perspective distortion using the guided upright tool in Lightroom. If you don't agree, reset the image to the previous version. --F. Riedelio 08:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC Info @F. Riedelio: I have uploaded a new version where the connection becomes more clear. The balconies are certainly horizontal and have lowered over time. Thanks a lot for your efford.--Ermell 20:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC))  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilbronn Naturfreundehaus-20220327-RM-163528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilbronn Luftbild-20220327-RM-163200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leidingshofer Tal-20220327-RM-163506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleiter Veilbronn-20220327-RM-170436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleiter Veilbronn-20220327-RM-165718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Tempel-20110104-RM-120028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Tempel-20110104-RM-120007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --- Spurzem 12:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Tempel-20110104-RM-115921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Tempel Drachenornament-20110104-RM-120108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, beautiful -- Spurzem 12:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Strand Surfer-20080502-RM-124031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photograph of identifiable people, use of a personality rights template necessary. --F. Riedelio 13:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC) Please look carefully the template is there. Thanks for the review. --Ermell 15:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilbronn Fürther Wand-20220327-RM-165237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Quality deteriorates a bit in the corners, but the main subject (and most of the photo) is perfectly sharp. --Aristeas 07:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilbronn Luftbild-20220327-RM-165535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarujá Praia da Enseada-20080502-RM-101255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good and really dramatic. -- Ikan Kekek 18:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Tempel Gate-20110104-RM-115001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue East King Beihai Park-20110104-RM-115303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue North King Beihai Park-20110104-RM-115456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Kunming Lake Winter-20110104-RM-140211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Interesting light. --Aristeas 09:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Western Paradise-20110104-RM-111247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:35, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Beihai Park Western Paradise-20110104-RM-112013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:35, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilbronn Luftbild-20220327-RM-165210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilbronn Naturfreundehaus-20220327-RM-163241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Beihai Park-20110104-RM-115319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationalen Center of performing arts Interior-20110104-RM-183753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Location would be nice. --Steindy 14:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Kunming Lake Winter-20110104-RM-140223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleitertal Luftbild-20220403-RM-174619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenpölz Luftaufnahme-20220403-RM-175209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Xiaoxitian Halle Innen-20110104-RM-111927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 14:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldstein Luftaufnahme-20220403-RM-174925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldstein Luftaufnahme-20220403-RM-174834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldsmühle Leinleiter-20070325-RM-140031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleitertal Luftbild-20220403-RM-171743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleitertal Luftbild-20220403-RM-174544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your picture, impressive! Charlie fong (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing forbidden city Belvedere of Embodying Benevolence-20071018-RM-142403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseß Luftbild-20220320-RM-163619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Kunming Lake Winter-20110104-RM-140312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing forbidden city roof-20071018-RM-144550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality with a rather tight upper crop --Virtual-Pano 11:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing forbidden incense burner-20071018-RM-152821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Forbidden City water vessel-20071018-RM-150052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Forbidden City Hall of Central Harmony terraces-20071018-RM-141732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)  Comment Also a good example of the so-called “telephoto compression.” --Aristeas 09:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Forbidden City Hall of Central Harmony terraces-20071018-RM-144042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bejing Forbidden City Relief-20071018-RM-151954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Tor des himmlischen Friedens-20071018-RM-125058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Schleuse Treppe-20190701-RM-180108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing forbidden city roof-20071018-RM-145215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing Forbidden City cupboard-20071018-RM-150254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not an ideal angle, because of the overlap with the background on the left, but a quality photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muscari armeniacum snow-20220409-RM-115520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, but that looks more like ice than snow to me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: You're right, but that's snow that melts in the sun. An hour later it was all gone.--Ermell 20:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC) Question Are you sure about the ID? These are quite a lot of flowers for this species! If this is a cultivated plant or a city plant it is most likely Muscari armeniacum. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)  Comment Thank you for your hint @Robert Flogaus-Faust: This is a cultivatet plant. Do you think I should change it?--Ermell 20:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park White Pagoda-20110104-RM-105607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt Treppe Michelin-20200805-RM-151740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing Haltepunkt Treppenaufgang-20170801-RM-111716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking verbotene Stadt Xiezhi-20071018-RM-153744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Star Flower Focus Stack-20220410-RM-170959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heroldstein Luftaufnahme-20220403-RM-174952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Lastenfahrrad-20131231-RM-114028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking verbotene Stadt Xiezhi-20071018-RM-153703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk Długa-20070402-RM-081546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jinan Grand Theater-20150520-RM-170343.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jinan Grand Theater-20150520-RM-170343.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinbuchfeld Osterbrunnen-20120406-RM-100948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langensendelbach Osterbrunnen-20120406-RM-115417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 08:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenpölz Osterbrunnen Nest-20090419-RM-092449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plech Osterbrunnen-20120405-RM-165340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Gebäude-20131231-RM-114208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peking Eingangstür-20131231-RM-113158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterei am Osterbrunnen in Kalteneggolsfeld-20080324-RM-154948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeegendorf Osterbrunnen-20120401-RM-083836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muscari botryoides snow-20220409-RM-112946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauf (Zapfendorf) Osterbrunnen-20180330-RM-094921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauf (Zapfendorf) Osterbrunnen-20180330-RM-094419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauf (Zapfendorf) Osterbrunnen-20180330-RM-094339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Balon Greyjoy 06:37, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt Osterbrunnen-20120408-RM-085242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebrach Osterbrunnen-20190425-RM-174227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good --UnpetitproleX 11:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baunach Osterbrunnen-20120408-RM-091425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adelsdorf Osterbrunnen-20120406-RM-103648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Gumbertsbrunnen-20190424-RM-164232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Gumbertsbrunnen-20190424-RM-164310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauf (Zapfendorf) Osterbrunnen-20180330-RM-094259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Obere Pfarre Treppe-20170701-RM-110552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beihai Park Tempel-20110104-RM-115812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Herr Möller,

in meiner Publikation über die Familie des Sozialpolitikers, Chemikers und Publizisten Otto Dammer, die im Laufe dieses Jahres erscheinen soll, werde ich voraussichtlich Ihr Bild vom Francke-Mausoleum auf dem St.-Georgen-Friedhof in Berlin-Friedrichshain verwenden. Ich werde selbstverständlich auf Sie als Urheber verweisen und auch darauf hinweisen, dass ich das Bild leicht bearbeitet habe (etwas mehr Licht, etwas mehr Kontraste, sonst aber nichts). Vielen Dank und herzliche Grüße

Raphael Dammer Template:Unsigned2

Dank und Idee/Bitte

Hallo Reinhold,

Dein neuester FP-Kandidat mit dem Scilla-Fokusstacking ist wieder einmal wunderschön. Daher möchte ich Dir einfach einmal für Deine Fokusstacking-Bilder von Blüten etc. danken! Ich bin in der Fotografie eigentlich kein Anhänger der „Alles muss scharf sein“-Theorie (für mich besteht, wie, glaube ich, Andreas Feininger das formuliert hat, Fotografie immer aus Schärfe und Unschärfe), aber bei diesen Bildern von Blüten etc. ist die durchgehende Schärfe zusammen mit dem schönen unscharfen Hintergrund wirklich super!

Dazu eine Idee: Hier blüht gerade der Kriechende Günsel, bei Euch also wahrscheinlich auch. Dieses unscheinbare Blümchen ist nicht sehr beliebt, aber ich finde den Blütenstand aus der Nähe gesehen eigentlich sehr hübsch – wenn man ein gutes Exemplar erwischt, sind die Blüten elegant symmetrisch angeordnet. Das sieht man am besten auf dieser alten Illustration. Meine Versuche, das ohne Fokusstacking zu fotografieren, waren nicht sehr erfolgreich ;–). Daher, natürlich nur, falls Du Zeit und Lust hast: Magst Du vielleicht einmal ein Fokusstacking des Blütenstandes eines Günsels probieren? Ich würde mich sehr darüber freuen, und ich denke, das Bild wäre auch wieder ein Gewinn für Commons und die Wikipedia-Artikel. (Das Foto, das derzeit den deutschen Artikel eröffnet, ist zwar ganz gut, aber es hat eben nur recht begrenzte Schärfe und v.a. wird, da nur wenige Blüten offen sind, die Symmetrie nicht sichtbar. Auf diesem Bild ist die Symmetrie besser zu erkennen, aber die einzelnen Pflanzen sind hier natürlich viel zu klein. Und so weiter … Kein Foto, das ich gefunden habe, zeigt den Blütenstand wirklich gut.)

Herzliche Grüße und alles Gute,

Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 08:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Servus Roman, danke für deine nette Nachricht. Ich glaube den Günsel habe ich heute gerade weggejätet da er in meinem kleinen Garten auch gerne kostbaren Platz beansprucht. Die kleine Blüte ist schon eine echte Herausforderung aber ich werde mal meine Bestes versuchen. Beste Grüße von Reinhold--Ermell (talk) 21:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Reinhold, danke für Deine nette Antwort ;–). Ja, der Günsel kann auch wuchern; könnte aber vielleicht auch Gundermann gewesen sein – auf den ersten Blick sind die beiden ähnlich und der Gundermann neigt mehr zum Wuchern. Ich habe hier im Garten nur Gundermann, den Günsel sehe ich eher an Waldrändern und auf Streuobstwiesen. Auf jeden Fall vielen Dank und herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Bitte achtet darauf, nicht im Garten sondern im LSG zu fotografieren... WLE geht bald wieder los :-) Z ^thomas 08:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

@Z thomas: Das ist natürlich eine gute Idee – dann wäre das Foto doppelt nützlich ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

WLM 2021 - international

Also bei Facebook werden die Ergebnisse schrittweise veröffentlicht. Ich spoiler nicht alles... Aber ich sag schon mal "Glückwunsch" zur tollen Platzierung. Viele Grüße --Z ^thomas 19:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo Ermell,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2022 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist bereits zum neunten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Landschaft
• 
  Halde Jägersfreude
• 
  Naturschutzgebiet Wacholderhänge bei Wallersberg
• 
  Landschaftsschutzgebiet Heseler Wald und Umgebung

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Detail
• 
  Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge im FFH-Gebiet Regnitz, Stocksee und Sandgebiete von Neuses bis Hallstadt
• 
  Blüten des Gamander-Ehrenpreis im Naturpark Taunus
• 
  Striegeliger Schichtpilz im Bruderwald in Bamberg

Seit dem vergangenen Jahr ist der Wettbewerb zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Bereichen Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. Im Bereich Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen - zum Beispiel in Bayern Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Würzburg oder in Sachsen Liste der Naturdenkmale in Stollberg/Erzgeb.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2022 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

In diesem Jahr feiert die FFH-Richtlinie ihren 30. Geburtstag. Aus diesem Grund vergeben wir fünf Sonderpreise für die Fotografen, die die meisten FFH-Gebiete fotografieren.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

permission for using picture

hi I m studying on structure of citrus flower . Can I use it in my article ? Template:UnsignedIP2

Gladly. Only my name must be given as the author. Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - March - Parliaments/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Silver -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Foto Mönchsambach Störche

Hallo! Ich gestalte gerade eine Homepage und möchte gerne das Bild File:Mönchsambach Störche-20210220-RM-153643.jpg verwenden. Urheber und Lizenz werden natürlich genannt. Noch ist die Seite nicht online, aber sobald es soweit ist, hinterlasse ich gerne noch einen Link. Viele Grüße, Tryout123 ([[User talk:Tryout123|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC) ferienhaus-wallern.at Tryout123 ([[User talk:Tryout123|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--Pi bot ([[User talk:Pi bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

• Photography in Nigeria
• Photographing vehicles
• I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - April - Stairs/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Bronze -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

Hallo Reinhold Möller, herzlichen Dank für den Barnstar ! Ich schätze es sehr ! Von wem darf ein Barnstar vergeben werden ? Ich habe einige Deiner Fotos angeschaut und bin begeistert ! Noch etwas Privates : auch ich war Musikerin. Im CAPAB Orchester und im CTSO (früherer Name) unter der Leitung von David Tidboald. Mit Christoph Eschenbach als Pianist habe ich auch gespielt;-) Grüße --Olga Ernst ([[User talk:Olga Ernst|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

This Sunday!

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Köttel Flagge Franken-20200725-RM-160251.jpg

Hallo Herr Möller, ich werde Ihr Bild in einem meiner YouTube Videos verwenden. Es geht um Rostocker Biere. Wenn Sie sich das Video ansehen wollen, es sollte im Laufe der Woche auf meinem Kanal erscheinen https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSdNYq7DwDYhiTzf4SBPF1Q Vielen Dank für das Bild! 88.152.185.142 13:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Using your photo of Pinot Gris

Hi! Thanks for letting me use your photo of Pinot gris grapes in my wine blog. I will give you credit. I have not published the blog post yet. But this is my blog site: http://www.whatsopentoday.blog/ Aleistner ([[User talk:Aleistner|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

stacking error or out of focus

Hi there. Just noticed your question on my recent butterfly nomination. The answer is out of focus. I've had to delete the note as it was on the main image file not the FP nomination page. Charlesjsharp ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the answer Template:Ping. You had also added a critical note to my

loosestrife picture

without comment. I removed it because other users and I couldn't necessarily see who wrote it and why. Unfortunately, that is not good style. Such petty criticism is not necessary for such an accomplished and successful photographer. Your photos set the standard on commons.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry Charlesjsharp ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Sharing your Wellington Arch photo 2013 on Quora

Hello, I am sharing your excellent photo of the Wellington Arch in London as part of an answer to a question posed on Quora. The question and my answer are found here: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-name-of-the-statue-on-top-of-Wellington-Arch?__pmsg__=+aFBBdUduOFNtdjl5N1YzUnMxZnc6YS5hcHAudmlldy5wbXNnLlN1Y2Nlc3M6W1siRGVjbGluZWQgcmVxdWVzdC4iXSwge31d Prairieplant ([[User talk:Prairieplant|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Verwendung von: Taufliege (Drosophila melanogaster)-20200607-RM-210232.jpg

Vielen Dank, Herr Möller, für das schöne Bild. Wir verwenden es hier: https://enkelgerecht-leben.de/winzige-plagegeister/ 2001:9E8:E91E:6F00:D4BE:34C:D42E:6990 13:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Drohnenfotos Fränkische Schweiz

Hallo, nachdem es zu dem einen Drohnenfoto bei WLE von dir die Frage zur Erforderlichkeit einer Genehmigung gab habe ich noch einmal über alle Fotos gesehen. Dabei habe ich bemerkt, dass im Naturpark/Landschaftsschutzgebiet Fränkische Schweiz ebenfalls eine Genehmigung erforderlich ist. §7 Abs. 1 Nr. 10: "außerhalb behördlich zugelassener Start- und Landeplätze mit Hängegleitern, Gleitflugzeugen, Ultraleichtflugzeugen und ähnlichen unbemannten Luftfahrzeugen zu starten, zu landen oder Flugmodelle mit Motor zu betreiben"[3]. War dir das bei den Aufnahmen bewusst und hast du eine entsprechende Genehmigung? Ich hoffe, du kannst uns schnell helfen. --GPSLeo ([[User talk:GPSLeo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Hallo GPSLeo,

das man in NSGs nicht fliegen darf ist klar, das es aber auch den gesamten Naturpark Fränkische Schweiz betrifft nicht. Das Gesetz ist vom 1997, da gab es noch keine Drohnen. Ich benutze Map2Fly und habe die Sicherheitshinweise an der Fernbedienung immer eingeschaltet. Dort werden die Flugverbotszonen angezeigt. Wenn es wirklich so ist das man für die gesamte Fränkische Schweiz eine Genehmigung braucht werde ich die mir schleunigst besorgen müssen.

Tut mir Leid wenn meine Beiträge so viel zusätzlichen Aufwand verursachen aber als Drohnenpilot ist umfangreiche Kenntnis des Rechts sicher hilfreich. Da gibt es bei mir noch Nachholbedarf.

Beste Grüße von Reinhold Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:

• Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up:

• Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon” (Ziko)
• The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay)

You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email.

• Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself!
• And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later.

Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

"Drosophila" picture

I just requested renaming of File:Taufliege (Drosophila melanogaster)-20200607-RM-210232.jpg as it is obviously not Drosophila melanogaster, but a Lauxaniid fly, probably Minettia fasciata or a similar species, compare to [4] -- Cymothoa exigua ([[User talk:Cymothoa exigua|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Template:Clear Hallo Ermell,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Orgelbild Buttenheim

Hallo, ich habe dein Bild in meinen Wiki-Beitrag zum Orgelbauer Josef Wiedemann eingefügt. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag! Or Bbg ([[User talk:Or Bbg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Nassanger

Das großartige Luftbild von Nassanger fiel mir beim Durchsehen deiner Galerie auf. Ich habe es in den Wiki-Artikel eigefügt, weil es die Anlage viel besser als die vorhandenen Bilder anschaulich macht. Or Bbg ([[User talk:Or Bbg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Dankeschön. Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

fungo velenosissimo!

Non è Amanita cesarea ma Amanita Muscaria!! Tossico!!!!! 79.58.121.140 12:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - July - Gaze/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Gold -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

You're invited to provide input…

Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.

In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Bamberg Hainbrücke Luftaufnahme-20211023-RM-105746.jpg

Used for https://www.bamberger-hainpark.de/der-hain/suedtangente 2003:CF:C723:2B89:3078:1E21:4C3B:1DAC 16:38, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Online workshop this weekend

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.

I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Use of Work

Thank you for the lovely photos. You are credited in my Blooket/Box of Lies game for ESL students in Japan. Link is below. https://dashboard.blooket.com/set/633e4618665da16415259c68 210.151.113.170 06:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Ermell!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infoTemplate:@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

St. Margaret's Westminster

Your Wikimedia Commons photograph of St. Margaret's Westminster has been attached to http://gentrekker.com/showmap.php?cemeteryID=680 with my thanks.

John Dickinson Template:UnsignedIP2

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

Hallo [[:#titleparts:PAGENAME]],

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) April 2017

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Ermell!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »

Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infoTemplate:@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch!

Template:WLM 2017 Danke

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Essen-Haus_der_Technik-4091349.jpg

Moin,

ich halte am 15.02.2018 einen Vortrag zum Thema "Industrie 4.0 - Innovationsbremse oder Innovationstreiber?" im Haus der Technik in Essen. Ich möchte gerne Ihr Foto https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Essen-Haus_der_Technik-4091349.jpg in meinem Vortrag und vor allem in meinem Video und auf meiner Homepage nutzen. Die Internet-Seite, auf der Ihr Bild genutzt wird, lautet: https://www.cmsattler.de/digitalisierung-innovationsbremse-oder-innovationstreiber/

Ich bitte höflich um Erlaubnis Ihr Bild zu nutzen, ansonsten werde ich es umgehend von meiner Webseite löschen. Bitte bestätigen Sie mir doch kurz die Nutzungserlaubnis per E-Mail an cmsattler@cmsattler.de in dem o.g. Rahmen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Claus Michael Sattler

OSX 659 Service & Consulting UG Claus Michael Sattler Birkenallee 49 49479 Ibbenbüren Deutschland

Telefon: +49-541-201.937-0 Mobil: +49-174-6031377 Fax: +49-541-201.937-99 Skype: claus.michael.sattler Template:Unsigned2

Place Massena

Hallo Herr Moeller, ich wuerde gern Ihr Foto vom Place Massena in Nizza fuer mein Buch ueber Beobachtungen/Erlebnisse im Sueden Frankreichs benutzen. Mein Buch wird im Selbstverlad bei Amazon herauskommen. Ich schicke Ihnen gern mehr Material. Vielen Dank, Christel Detsch cbdetsch@gmail.com Template:Unsigned2

Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - January - Trash and waste management/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Gold

Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - January - Blue/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Silver

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo ROOTPAGENAME,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) April 2018

Used your photo

at http://cosmetictribe.com/makeup-and-superficiality/ Template:UnsignedIP2

Bomag road roller

Send me details 91 9446925637 Template:UnsignedIP2

Bildverwendung nichtkommerzielle Ausstellung

Sehr geehrter Herr Möller, ich bin Ursela Barteczko von Weltveränderer e.V. und wir sind derzeit auf der Suche nach Motiven zum Thema "Recycling" rund um die Welt. Die Asustellung ist nicht kommerziell und nur für Bildugnszwecke gedacht. Dürften wir ihr Motiv mit dem Radfahrer, der große Mengen Papier/Pappe auf dem Fahrrad transportiert dafür verwenden? Natürlich benennen wir Sie als Autor. Wir würden uns sehr über Ihre Genehmigung freuen, gerne per eMail an ursela@weltveraenderer.eu Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ursela Barteczko Template:UnsignedIP2

Sa kushton

Kamioni Template:UnsignedIP2

Picture of Marek Janowski

Dear,

I work as picture redactor for the newspaper Le Temps in Switzerland. We will probably used your picture of Marek Janowski.

My colleagues will send you a confirmation if it is.

I wont be in the newspaper next week.

Here you are the mail if you need more informations:

images@letemps.ch

Kind regards,

Cendrine Luccarini Template:UnsignedIP2

Verwendung eines Fotos

Sehr geehrter Herr Möller,

Ihr sehr schönes Bild der Kirche in Bischwind nutzen wir auf unserer Website www.ebernleben.de im Bereich Ortsbegehungen. Viele Grüße aus Ebern,

Frank Ziegler Template:UnsignedIP2

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Template:Autotranslate

Commons:Photo challenge/2019 - November - Long Exposures/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Gold

Photo Credit:

A photo has been attributed and will be used in an article discussing the new 2020 Corsair by Lincoln Motor Company in OakvilleNews.Org Template:UnsignedIP2

Using image in scientific publication

Dear Mr. Möller, I would like to use your image "Bruderwald_sunrays_150265.jpg" in a figure for a scientific publication. I would credit your name as the author of the image. Please let me know if you would like to see a draft of the publication (contact me at my university e-mail address below rather than through Wikimedia). Sincerely, Cameron Buckner Associate Professor of Philosophy University of Houston cjbuckner@uh.edu Template:UnsignedIP2

Bild von Radu Lupu (snl.no)

Sehr geehrter Herr Möller,

ich wollte Ihnen nur kurz Bescheid geben, dass ich Ihr Bild von Radu Lupu auf seine Seite im norwegischen Lexikon snl.no hochgeladen habe: https://snl.no/Radu_Lupu Vielen Dank, dass Sie das Bild bei wikimedia commons reingestellt haben!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Claudia Bätcke Template:UnsignedIP2

Isixhosa

Molo unjani Na kwenziwa ntoni apha i love it so much ndcela ukubuza ukuba yimalini ngoba ndinguye a 10 years old please tell me please nobandimncinci Thanks Bye-bye Template:UnsignedIP2

Foto Altes Rathaus Bamberg

Lieber Reinhold Möller,

ich verwende Ihr schönes Bild vom Alten Rathaus Bamberg für einen Artikel der Lübecker Nachrichten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Hanno Kabel

Lübecker Nachrichten Lokalredaktion Lübeck

Dr.-Julius-Leber-Str. 9-11 23552 Lübeck

0451/144-2414

hanno.kabel@ln-luebeck.de

We would like to use your photo

Hi,

We have created a trip inspiration website https://trifera.com

We were inspired by your photo found at

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:San_Sebastian_Kontxa_beach_1190650.jpg

We have just launched our website and wanted to let you know that your photo is featured as one of the San Sebastian photos. We think it is a great representation of the city and are excited to share it. We hope it inspires people to visit this amazing place. Each photo on our site provides both a link to the author/photo page as well as the license information.

If you have any concerns about this or prefer that we do not share this photo further please feel free to reach out to us directly at support@trifera.com

Best regards,

The Trifera team

Altensalz Kriegerdenkmal

Das Foto wird im Projekt www.denkmalprojekt.org verwendet.

Foto Tanzlinde Peesten

Sehr geehrter Herr Möller,

im Rahmen von Fotorecherchen für das Lehrgangsskriptum "Grundlagen der Baumprüfung und Baumpflege" der Forstlichen Ausbildungsstätte Traunkirchen (Österreich), sind wir auf ihr Bild der Tanzlinde in Peesten gestoßen. Diese fügt sich hervorragend in das Gesamtwerk ein, danke, dass sie diesen beeindruckenden Baum abgebildet haben und über wikimediaCommons teilten.

Wir hoffen die Verwendung ihres Fotos ist in ihrem Sinne,

mit herzlichen Grüßen

Nadja Santer (www.baumpartner.at) Template:UnsignedIP2

Use of image in CABI Invasive Species Compendium

Dear Reinhold,

I am writing to inform you your image of Chrysolina coerulans (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chrysolina_coerulans_P1070544.jpg) has been used in CABI's Invasive Species Compendium. The link to the Open Access datasheet is here: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/113296.

CABI is a not-for-profit organisation which uses subscription revenue to off-set the costs of maintaining and updating these Compendia products. Our Open-Access Invasive Species Compendium (https://www.cabi.org/isc/) provides free access to information and data on invasive species to over 1.4 million users annually.

Thank you for making your images available for use, it helps make our resources much more accessible to readers!

Best wishes,

Alice Campain Scientific Picture Researcher Email: a.campain@cabi.org Template:Unsigned2

Verwndung Foto Wollschweber

Hallo Herr Möller, ich halte für den NABU Stuttgart ein Vortrag über Wildbienen und würde gerne unter Nennung Ihres Namnes ihr Foto des Großen Wollschwbers verwenden, den die Zuhörer:innen eher kennen als den Trauerschweber, den ich als Parasit von Mauerbienen thematisiere. Ich hoffe, das ist OK für Sie. Vielen Dank. Herzliche Grüße Stefan Kress Template:Unsigned2

I am using your knife picture

Also I am menson you as author Template:UnsignedIP2

Mushroom Identification...

Hello there! Happy Thursday to you.

I wanted to let you know that the mushroom you've taken a beautiful photo of is likely an Amanitas Muscaria, not an Amanitas Caesarea. The white spots on the cap of the mushroom are a big indicator distinguishing the two. Here's an article as well just so you know I'm not making this up.

Enjoy,

https://www.mushroom-appreciation.com/amanita-caesarea.html Template:Unsigned2

Lancia stratos

Hola, me gustaria usar su fotografia para una publicacion en instagram. Ira acompañada de un articulo contando la historia del coche. No se hara ninguna modificacion salvo, tal vez, adecuar su tamaño al formato de instagram.

Lancia Stratos HF Kulmbach 2018 6170093.jpg Template:UnsignedIP2

Use

Beautiful image. Using for a school project. Thank you! Template:Unsigned2

Bild Tretzendorfer Weiher

Hallo Herr Möller, wir verwenden das schöne Bild vom Tretzendorfer Weiher auf unserer Ferienwohnungswesbite um das wunderbare Aurachtal zu bewerben. Vielen Dank dafür! Template:UnsignedIP2

Using your photo to describe the parts of a door in spanish

Dear Ermell,

Looking for a door photo in commons, I found your photo of this beautiful door. I have used it to name the parts of a door for commons and then ilustrate the article puerta in spanish.

Kind regards,

Lambrusquiño. Template:Unsigned2

Thank you

Dear Reinhold Möller,

Thanks for your lovely photo of Big Ben. I plan to use it in an upcoming music video, Climate Crisis Anthem. If you provide your email address, I can send you a link, or you can check on our website - www.climatecrisisanthem.com - around January 10. Hopefully, it will be out by then.

Guru Fatha Singh climateanthem@gmail.com

Use of Photo

Hi Reinhold Möller,

I am messaging you to let you know your photo "File:Wald-Kahlkopf (Psilocybe pelliculosa)-20191014-RM-112540.jpg" is going to be used in an upcoming video for FoundMyFitness (https://www.foundmyfitness.com/) about new research about psilocybin and depression.

If you have any questions, please reach out to Avo Media at koby@avomedia.ca

Thank you for the excellent photo!

Your picture

Hi,

I came across you excellent picture 1200px-Bamberg_Naturkundemuseum_Fossil_Quastenflosse_17RM1927.jpg on Wikimedia Commons.

Now using it to illustrate the fossil record on a Norwegian language webpage about "Different types of creationism" https://www.enhet.no/temaer/evolusjon/forskjellige-former-for-kreasjonisme/

Have of course given you due credit directly below the photo and also in the pop-up box you'll see when placing the cursor on top of the image.

All the best,

Fredinne

Danke für das Foto

Hallo Reinhard Möller,

ich werde dieses Foto https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holzbiene_(Xylocopa_violacea)_Raps_5233258.jpg in meiner Masterarbeit verwenden. Die Masterarbeit wird nicht veröffentlicht. Für die Bereitstellung möchte ich mich bedanken!

Alles Gute, Oliver Peters Template:UnsignedIP2

Thank you for use of your photo

Hello Reinhold Möller, I have used your image [5] in a PowerPoint for ESL/international students at a college in BC, Canada. It is used for educational purposes. Thank you for your work!

Image Use

With your permission, I'd like to use your image of the Bamburg Horseman for my Open Resource Art Appreciation course. I will include appropriate credit and the Creative Commons licencse. The image will not be edited or overprinted and will be shared. Template:Unsigned2

Use of your photo

Hello,

Your photo was used to illustrate the Obituary of the musician in the newspapers Le Monde.

Thank you, Best regards Template:UnsignedIP2

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:London_Big_Ben_Inner_Clock_Face_1070925-PSD.jpg

Sie baten um Nachricht, wenn man Ihre Fotos nutzt:

https://www.meier-bading.de/parship/automatische-verlaengerung/

mfG

Thomas Meier-Bading Template:UnsignedIP2

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - August - Insects/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Silver -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your picture!

Dear Reinhold,

I have used one of your pictures in a web article: [6]https://tietokayttoon.fi/-/10616/selvitys-liikkuvien-tyokoneiden-paastovahennysten-tiella-haasteita.

Best regards,

Risto 46.30.132.139 06:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Misidentified mushroom

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I think this mushroom image is misidentified. Psilocybe pelliculosa is not a German species, and the pictured mushroom is also clearly not Psilocybe medullosa/silvatica (known as Wald-Kahlkopf in German). I'm confident that the mushroom isn't a Psilocybe species at all, but I don't know what genus it is instead. I recategorized the image and changed the description to "unidentified mushroom", but I didn't want to rename the file without consent. Do you have any thoughts or suggestions on what the mushroom could be? --Paranaja ([[User talk:Paranaja|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Nutzung im Rahmen einer Konzertankündigung

Hallo Herr Möller,

vielen Dank für das schöne Foto aus dem Max-Littmann-Saal in Bad Kissingen! Wir haben es gerne - unter Namensnennung gemäß Lizenz - für die Presse-Ankündigung des Konzertes einer gemeinnützigen Organisation verwendet.

Beste Grüße,

Chorjugend im Fränkischen Sängerbund 2001:9E8:3238:EF00:B989:8D6C:9C16:169F 20:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Mistake in determination of Amanita caesarea

Hello,

Your photo "Caesar's mushroom (Amanita caesarea) in the brother forest in Bamberg. Focus stack of 18 frames" is in fact a photo of Amanita muscaria.

So it's not a good edible fungi, and is a toxic mushroom.

Please, correct the title, or remove the photo, in order to avoid intoxications.

Thanks, Santi Serrano. 188.171.200.212 19:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello Santi Serrano,

please see the Discussion Page for this image. Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Photo of Botanical Garden in Bamberg

Your photograph is now included in the webpage "Strengthening residents’ connection with their gardening heritage in Bamberg (Germany)" in the UNESCO World Heritage Centre website: https://whc.unesco.org/en/canopy/bamberg/. Thank you for your contribution! 193.242.192.9 10:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Used your Phtography „Kernkraftwerk Grafenrheinfeld“

Good day, I used your wonderfull photography of „Kernkraftwerk Grafenrheinfeld“ inside my projekt so I leave a reply. You can see the edited result of the background-animation on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJvRAKGKh2M Best regards, Zetadotbar0 ([[User talk:Zetadotbar0|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Lieber Herr Möller

gerne möchten wir Ihr Foto vom Haselnussbohrer (File:Curculio nucum-20220808-RM-090446.jpg) für die eNews 04/2022 der SAVE Foundation nutzen. Die eNews werden auf unserer Webseite publiziert: www.save-foundation.net

Freundliche Grüsse

Bettina Müller 2A02:1210:8E61:5400:0:0:1:2 13:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from the CPUG Board

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura ([[User talk:Ailura|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, BASEPAGENAME! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Template:-

Happy holidays

Happy New Year!

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Ermell!

The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikimedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  19:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!    -- Tournasol7 ([[User talk:Tournasol7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:10, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

User:Aristeas/Cards/Holidays 2022-2023

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, BASEPAGENAME! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. Pierre André ^(talk) 11:32, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

User:SHB2000/CC

Meine besten Wünsche

Hallo Ermell, vielen Dank für deine Nachricht. Ich wünsche dir und deiner Familie auch frohe Weihnachten und das Beste für 2023, vor allem Gesundheit! Poco a poco ([[User talk:Poco a poco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

File:At Tenerife 2022 022.jpg

Maybe easier to chat here than at QIC? I checked and the CA had been removed in the first version that was uploaded. I'm not sure where you are seeing residual CA that I could try to fix? Thanks. Mike Peel ([[User talk:Mike Peel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello Mike, I did add an annotation. Only little CA and easy to fix. Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, now tweaked. I also realised I forgot to apply profile corrections, have done that at the same time. Happy holidays! Mike Peel ([[User talk:Mike Peel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Picture of rolling-shutter

Hello I just finished writing a book on proxiphoto. To illustrate the rolling-shutter in a lexicon, I found your picture. Do you mind if I use it? Frederic Labaune ([[User talk:Frederic Labaune|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

I don´t mind. Thanks. Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Bagger

Hallo Ermell, ich antworte Dir der Einfachheit hier:

Der/die Aufkleber befindet(n) sich auf dem Bagger, links ist die Mulde ("trough"). Gemeint sind diese BIV Aufkleber, die recht prägnant sind.

Viele Grüße aus dem Rheinland

Bamberg Liebherr 506-20160724-RM-123350

Grunpfnul ([[User talk:Grunpfnul|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:55, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Ich habe links einen Aufkleber gesucht. Verzeichnung kann ich aber keine entdecken oder bin ich blind? Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Ermell, ich glaube, wir reden aneinander vorbei (vielleicht hätte ich auch disturbed sagen sollen ;-)) - also die Mulde, wie auch die Aufkleber, stören leider das Gesamtbild. An der Mulde kann man jetzt nicht viel machen, aber ich war so frei und habe dir die Aufkleber entfernt - wenn du möchtest, kannst du das Bild ja verwenden (als neue Version in dein Bild hochladen).

Viele Grüße und einen guten Rutsch wünsche ich!

Bagger1

Grunpfnul ([[User talk:Grunpfnul|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Grunpfnul, warum die Aufkleber entfernt werden müssen ist mir nicht ganz klar. Hier bei Wikicommons dienen die Bilder doch der Dokumentation und sollten so wenig wie möglich verändert werden. Trotzdem vielen Dank für die Mühe und ebenfalls einen guten Rutsch. Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:38, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Ermell, ich verstehe den Sinn eher in der Darstellung des Baggers - mit inhaltlichem Fokus auf diesen. Die Leihfirma würde, meines Erachtens, da keine Notwendigkeit zur Darstellung haben - aber das ist meine Ansicht und nicht gültiges Gesetz. Daher war auch meine Wertung so ausgefallen (die man bitte nicht als persönlichen Angriff verstehen soll). Grunpfnul ([[User talk:Grunpfnul|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Grunpfnul, in der QI Kategorie wird eigentlich nur die technische Qualität beurteilt und bewertet. Bei Featured Images sieht das ganz anders aus. Ich fühle mich nicht persönlich angegriffen auch wenn die Kommunikation in Textform größere Interpretationsspielräume bietet als gesprochene Worte mit Tonfall und Gesten. Beste Grüße Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)