User talk:Emha/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

TUSC token 4fa9f3f402ea4b80a02c1a6ca146acce

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Emha (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 08:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Items missing OTRS ticket ID

Hallo Emha. Bitte sorge dafür, dass durch dich nach Commons transferierte Dateien (wie File:Braunfels Schloßhof 20080401.jpg) nicht in dieser Wartungskategorie landen bzw. bleiben. Danke! --Leyo 13:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leyo, danke für den Hinweis. 1) Die Kategorie wird mir unter dem inkriminierten Bild nicht angezeigt - warum? 2) Beim Aufrufen der Kategorie sehe ich das Bild darin. Aber wie kann ich eine Kategorie entfernen, wenn sie mir nicht angezeigt wird? 3) Ich dachte immer, dass beim Übertrag der Bot sich drum kümmert, die entsprechenden DE-Bausteine in Commons-Vorlagen umzuwandeln, ist dem (also) nicht (immer) so? 4) Konkret: wie krieg ich die Kategorie jetzt weg? Danke für die Antwort(en) im Voraus und freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1 und 2) Special:Preferences → Aussehen → Zeige versteckte Kategorien
3) Wenn ein OTRS-Baustein auf der Dateibeischreibungseite ist, klappt der Transfer leider nie korrekt.
4) Die fehlenden Informationen (nicht nur vollständigen OTRS-Baustein) von der Dateibeischreibungsseite in der de-WP manuell nachtragen…
Alles klar? ;-) --Leyo 16:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1) und 2): da hätte ich echt selber drauf kommen können...
3) Wie doof... aber gut zu wissen
4) So besser?
5) Ja, glaube schon; danke für die schnelle Hilfe und Gruß, --Emha (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Und wenn ich Dich grad "dran hab": findest Du die Umbenennerei von mir sinnvoll/ausreichend?
4) Betreffend OTRS, ja; betreffend Ergänzung der anderen verloren gegangenen Informationen, nein. Ich hätte es so gemacht. Mühsam, ich weiss… --Leyo 16:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sieht besser aus. Ich werde versuche, mir das einzuprägen… Beste Grüße, --Emha (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Noch eine Antwort zum PS. In diesem Fall hätte ich auf eine Umbenennung verzichtet, da der Dateiname in der de-WP weder inkorrekt noch nichtssagend war. Dieses Statement finde ich gut: „Bitte beachte, dass nur dann ein abweichender Dateiname gewählt werden sollte, wenn es dafür einen triftigen Grund gibt.“ --Leyo 17:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bautzen I.jpg

Hallo Emha! Hattest Du was an der Datei verändert? Gestern wurde sie noch in den jeweiligen Artikeln dargestellt, wenn man "nicht angemeldet" war -heute nicht mehr... Besten Gruß, -- LeoDavid (talk) 10:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo LeoDavid, ich habe nichts verändert. Das ist (leider) ein bekannter Fehler nach Commons-Transfer von Bildern, siehe hier. Ich habe den Artikel ent- und gesichtet, ist es jetzt besser? Freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Leider nein: in dem Artikel de:Justizvollzugsanstalt Bautzen ist das Foto als IP zu sehen, bei de:Benno von Heynitz und de:Speziallager hingegen nicht. Irgendwie sollte das doch zu beheben sein. *ratlos* Besten Gruß, -- LeoDavid (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jetzt besser? Ich habe das o.g. Procedere angewandt, mir wird das Bild nicht eingeloggt angezeigt. Hast Du auf der de.WP Sichterrechte? Dann kannst Du das auch machen. Gruß, --Emha (talk) 12:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jetzt klappt es auch bei Benno von Heynitz wieder. Ja habe ich, muss mich mal bei Gelegenheit intensiver mit auseinandersetzen, vielen Dank, -- LeoDavid (talk) 13:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen. Gruß, --Emha (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ERF_für_Kinder_logo.svg

File:ERF_für_Kinder_logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leyo 14:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ERF_50_Jahre_Logo.svg

File:ERF_50_Jahre_Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leyo 14:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Emha,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchhain-Großseelheim, Vordere Hofstatt 2 20110925 Emha 3543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments hey, das war doch mein Motiv!!! --Ralf Roletschek 15:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amoeneburg Waschbach 20110924 Emha 3480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good atmosphere and general quality. --Coyau 15:16, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Johann friedrich ahlfeld.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Johann friedrich ahlfeld.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Saibo (Δ) 17:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So besser? --Emha (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Emha, dank dir. Besser ists schon - nur: "70 Jahren nach dem Tod des Urhebers" steht in der Vorlage. Sie gilt nur dann, wenn der Urheber (der Fotograf/Maler) schon mehr als 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Kennst du den Name des Urhebers? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe mich da auf den originalen Uploader auf der de:WP, de:Benutzer:APPER verlassen. Das ist ja ein sehr erfahrener Nutzer und von dem stammt der Lizenzbaustein auf de, den ich beim Übertrag lediglich übernommen habe. Freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 09:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Ich habe die Quelle ja angegeben, die ist hier. Ich kenne mich mit den Commons-Regeln nicht aus, aber auf de.wikipedia (wo ich es hochgeladen hab) gibt es de:Vorlage:Bild-PD-alt-100. Nach dieser pragmatischen Regelung wird davon ausgegangen, dass ein Werk gemeinfrei ist, wenn der Urheber nicht ermittelt werden kann und das Werk über 100 Jahre alt ist - in diesem Fall über 110 Jahre. Wie gesagt: ich weiß nicht, wie das bei Commons ist, das solltest du ja wissen, wenn du das Bild trotz des entsprechenden Commons-Hinweises auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite transferiert hast. --APPER (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Du hast recht und ich spreche mich dafür aus, dass wir das Bild hier löschen und auf de.WP wieder herstellen. Würden Ihr das machen? Ich bin knopflos. Die Informationslage gibt m.E. nichts anderes her. Sorry, da hatte ich nicht lange genug nachgedacht, aber Menschen machen halt auch Fehler... --Emha (talk) 13:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC) PS: Und die unterschiedlichen 100er-Regeln hier und auf de.WP sind nicht unbedingt unverwirrend.[reply]
Es gibt auch (zumindest mittlerweile) die Seite de:WP:NCF, die die Unterschiede versucht klar zu machen. Ich kann gern in dewp wiederherstellen und hier löschen.
In der Zwischenzeit befand jemand, dass {{Anonymous-EU}} gilt. Ja, ich kenne diese Vorlage - und finde sie nicht sinnvoll. Denn das wird hier nicht wirklich möglich sein: "stelle sicher, dass niemand Urheberrechtschaftsansprüche geltend gemacht hat." Die de.Wikipedia-Bildrechteseite spricht sich auch deutlich gegen diesen "Ausweg" aus. Da der User nun diese Urheberrechtsvorlage draufgesetzt hat, werde ich dann wohl einen Löschantrag stellen müssen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ich kann auch gerne selber einen Löschantrag stellen. Schließlich habe ich es "verbockt". Was ist Dir lieber? --Emha (talk) 14:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC) PS: Sorry für die einmonatige Pause, war zwischenzeitlich offline.[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amoeneburg Erfurtshausen Haarhaeuser Strasse 20110924 Emha 3363-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Emha,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Georg Malin.jpg

Hallo Emha. IMO hast du da {{Personality rights}} an einem ungünstigen Ort eingefügt. Aber wichtig ist vor allem, dass du den Baustein eingefügt hast. --Leyo 11:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Leyo, der Künstler mag ja noch eine (vielleicht oft portraitierte) Person des öffentlichen Lebens sein. Schau Dir mal als Beispiel File:Wenkbach-Dorfmarkt.jpg an: 10 identifizierbare Leute von alt bis jung. IMO kann dieser Baustein gar nicht weit genug oben eingefügt werden. --Emha (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In den Parameter Description passt der Baustein nicht. Der Lizenzabschnitt ist doch passend dafür. Dort geht er darum, wie das Bild verwendet werden kann (oder eben nicht).
Falls du nicht einverstanden bist, sollte das im Forum oder im Village Pump diskutiert werden. --Leyo 12:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Aber nein, dafür ist mein Anliegen nicht wichtig genug. --Emha (talk) 09:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:WiesbadenKurhausNachts.jpg

File:WiesbadenKurhausNachts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wdwd (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meine Bilder in deiner Galerie

Hi,

ich sehe, dass einige meiner Bilder in deiner Galerie aufscheinen. Falls das Absicht ist, ist das eh o.k. Falls du Fotos von Mittelhessen in deiner Galerie auflistet, dann ist irgendwo der Wurm drin ;-), wollte ich nur mal gesagt haben, Grüße, --Manuela (Diskussion) 18:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Manuela, Du sprichst u.a. von File:Hauskirchen,Hauptstraße,Kreuzung.JPG. Der Grund ist die Kamera, die Du benutzt. Die Kategorie Taken with Leica... ist nun mal eine Unterkategorie von Leica und die sitzen in Wetzlar, Mittelhessen. Mir ist das auch aufgefallen, lies selbst, was die Antworten im Forum ergaben. Die Aufforderung von h-stt habe ich noch nicht umgesetzt... Freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC) PS: Deine Signatur funktioniert auf den Commons nicht, da es hier nur "user" und keine "Benutzer/in" gibt). Vielleicht änderst Du das, damit Du ansprechbar bist?[reply]

Why?

Hi, very short question: why did you do this? I can't see the reason (and you didn't transfer the category description and the interwiki neither). --Emha (talk) 09:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I did this because there was two categories for the same people and I had to choose which of them was the best to keep. All the files and foremost the entry on Wikidata was using Category:Karin Müller (Politikerin). "Your" category was unused and empty (not your fault, yours was created first but emptied by another one), and the interwiki was pointing on a disambiguation page. I work on a lot of interwiki links, especially on wp:de ones, that point on disambiguation pages. In this case the correct article have his new name since 2009 and you created the category this year. This have generated an alert with my bot (automated bots could have propagated this error). Please make sure to give the correct interwikis links whan you create a category.
Now that Wikidata links the Commons category and all wikipeda articles about Karin Müller, an interwiki bot will eventually do his job on this category, or, better, interwikis will disappear on Commons as they have been on Wikipedia. With a little chance, this will be this year. Same for the descriptions that will be centralized on Wikidata.
Louperivois Ψ @ 14:54, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, at first: I would have been able to see your answer on your talk page. To the Category, let's have a look:

  1. de:Karin Müller (Politikerin) exists since 2009
  2. 19:23, 27. Feb. 2013‎ I created the Category:Karin Müller on Commons. Here happended my first mistake, I wrote the wrong interwiki to the disambiguation. Then
  3. 19:26, 27. Feb. 2013‎ I included the {{Commonscat}} in the article on deWP. Here happened my second mistake. Instead of linking to {{Commonscat|Karin Müller}} I only wrote {{Commomscat}}. These two places would have been the place to make a correction to get a consistency. The entry on Wikidata is also Karin Müller, not "Karin Müller (Politikerin)". Here in Commons there is no neccesarity to redirect the category, because no one needs Category:Karin Müller. And sorry, deleting the interwiki link (instead of correcting) and the cat description is close to vandalism in my opinion. You deleted meta informations. --Emha (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally I should have been migrate the categories and the description on Category:Karin Müller (Politikerin). I just did that. But it is clear in my mind that it must not have two categories about the same person in Commons, it doesn't make sense. And when I talk about Wikidata, I mean the P373 value on the entry ("Karin Müller (Politikerin)"). Louperivois Ψ @ 19:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WLPA

Thanks!--ArildV (talk) 22:01, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I wanted to write an article on the german Wikipedia signpost and coming from the blogpost was looking for the results. Well, they looked strange and so I changed the layout according to the other sites. Hope all was correct. Why did so few countries take part? Regards, --Emha (talk) 22:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think it was a combination of that it was a new project, FOP-problem in many countries, and that many potential volunteers were already involved in WLM and does´t had time for a new project (and maybe also Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2012/11#DMCA_Take-Down). Regards--ArildV (talk) 22:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
sounds reasonable. Some say, we need an European Commons server. Could help. Bye and good night --Emha (talk) 23:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files

All these files are my pictures from the concert in Portland on January 15, 2013, during the Born This Way Ball tour at the Rose Garden Arena, with my Sony Ericsson, can you tell me I need to not be eliminated? Thanks :) i just take the photos with my mobile, I don't knew that needed a license , please help --FerniiMM (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files:

Hi, these images looked for me absolutely as screenshots, f.i. of a TV screen. I believe you that you took them with your smartphone and undo my edits. Sorry, I should had have a better look at the Metadata. --Emha (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no problem, thank you very much !!, Bye ! :D --FerniiMM (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gcarus

Moin Emha! Schmeisst Du bitte einen schnellen Blick drauf? Heissen Dank! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Habe ich, liebe/r Hedwig. Danke für's zurückziehen, aber Dein Löschgrund hat sowieso nicht den Commons:Löschrichtlinien entsprochen. Bitte das nächste Mal sorgfältiger sein! Danke und Gruß, --Emha (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, das war ein Schnellschuss. Aber dafuer haben wir ja die Gemeinschaft, meistens merkt es einer. :) I habe uebrigens eine nette email vom GCarus zurueckbekommen. Alles geklaert, mehr Fotos sind in der Warteschleife! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

rm überflüssig, LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für's Bescheidsagen, das hätte ich sonst nicht kapiert. Und wenn ich nicht mehr OTRS bin, bekomme ich das Recht auch automatisch wieder? --Emha (talk) 08:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, erst jetzt gesehen. Automatisch nicht, der Bürokrat sollte es wieder zurückgeben. Übrigens: Ich hab dir eine Mail wegen OTRS gesendet. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Und ich habe Dir geantwortet. Du siehst mich reichlich verwirrt, aber vielleicht können wir das schnell aufklären. --Emha (talk) 16:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Emha, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Didym (talk) 16:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Falsche Zuordnung vom Foto zum Benutzer?

Hallo Emha! Dieser Edit passt nicht; der Fotograf ist Thomy3k; oder habe ich da etwas übersehen? Gruß --Sir James (talk) 19:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Sir, schön, mal wieder von Dir zu lesen! Schau Dir mal
an. Dort steht jedes Mal |Source=de:Wikipedia |Date=07-04 |Author=H2OMy Beide Bilder sind also zu Unrecht im {{Information}}-Feld mit "Urheber": Thomas Damm gekennzeichnet. Die Kategorie hatte ich halbautomatisch allen Dateien zugewiesen, die die Merkmale "de" und "H2OMy" aufwiesen, dabei ist mir das natürlich nicht aufgefallen. Die Bildbeschreibungen müssen also noch angepasst werden.
Sag mal, wärst Du so lieb, Dich hier zu äußern? Das wäre klasse, wenn Deine Vorarbeiten nicht umsonst gewesen wären. Gerne kannst Du es auch selbst umsetzen, aber ich denke, das weißt Du, gelle? Dank und Gruß, --Emha (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe dort geantwortet. Danke & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto dimroth 1935 würzburg-2.jpg

Hallo Emha,

wer tritt denn da dem OTRS gegenüber als Urheber bzw. Rechteinhaber auf? Das "Chemische Institut der Universität Würzburg" wie in der Bildbeschreibung genannt? Und wenn ja, wie kommen die zu den Bildrechten? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 16:28, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Rosenzweig, ich habe Dir eine E-Mail geschickt. --Emha (talk) 16:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Danke & Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New URL for OgreBot's old version filemover

Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:41, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

E-Mail unzustellbar

Hallo. Bitte prüfe mal Deine E-Mail-Einstellungen. Wikimail kommt nicht durch. Danke. --Krd 14:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis, da habe ich mein Weiterleitungspostfach zu lange inaktiv gelassen... tststs, --Emha (talk) 14:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS Bitte

Hallo Emha, irgendwie warst du an der OTRS Behandlung und Freigabe von File:1984 Prof Hable.jpg beteiligt. Kannst du das Ticket auch auf File:Erich_Hable_1984.jpg ausdehnen? Ich mag einfach nicht nochmals den Prozess mit dem User durchlaufen. Und es ist die identische Aufnahme, leicht verändert. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich schau mir das wohlwollend an. Beste Grüße, --Emha (talk) 03:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, das war eindeutig. So eindeutig, dass ich dazu raten würde, eine Variante als {{Duplicate}} zu löschen. Freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 22:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Summerjam 20130706 Martin Zobel DSC 0575 by Emha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:07, 03 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:1606 Georg Friedrich Ludwig zu Nassau-Siegen.jpg

File:1606 Georg Friedrich Ludwig zu Nassau-Siegen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help.

Hello. Be so kind. confirm the license of those pictures. Here's license from the author. <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Лицензия Creative Commons" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a>
Произведение «Drawings of the artist Tatarnikov Alexander (diezelsun)» созданное автором по имени <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" href="http://vk.com/technoglamour_man" property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL">Tatarnikov Alexander (diezelsun)</a>, публикуется на условиях <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Весь мир (в т.ч. Россия и др.)</a>.
Основано на произведении с <a xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" href="http://vk.com/technoglamour_man" rel="dct:source">http://vk.com/technoglamour_man</a>.
Разрешения, выходящие за рамки данной лицензии, могут быть доступны на странице <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" href="http://vk.com/technoglamour_man" rel="cc:morePermissions">http://vk.com/technoglamour_man</a>.

Could you please sign license, if not difficult. File:DiezelSun..jpg, File:DiezelSun.jpg, File:Натюрморт DiezelSun.JPG, File:Sasha Grey - DiezelSun.jpg, File:DiezelSun - Св. Валентин.png, File:DiezelSun - Michael Jackson.jpg, File:Artdiezelsun2.jpg, File:DiezelSun2.jpg, File:DiezelSun15.jpg, File:Artdiezelsun.jpg, File:DiezelSunLove.jpg, File:DiezelsunUFO.jpg, File:DiezelSunAvrilLavigne.jpg, File:DiezelSun3.jpg, File:DiezelSunUFO.jpg, File:DiezelSun10.jpg, File:ДизельлайкDiezelSun.jpg, File:Ufostyle.jpg, File:Lucy Lawless7.jpg...

The author gave permission for email, but it was not enough. Now granted a license from him. Thank you very much. --Perigas77 (talk) 17:33, 28. Nov. 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest. --InterMediaWiki message deliveryfase (talk) 01:38, 25. Jan. 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Emha,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

--Bernd Gross (talk) 19:05, 16. Aug. 2014 (UTC)

Photos from Jafarov

Hallo, Emha. Here is new photos from Ilgar Jafarov from another event. And some photos from 2012 Paralympics. I think I put all licences in correct order this time. Vielen dank. --Interfase (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interfase, thanks for the uploads! I'm wondering if my English is so bad or why else you still use {{PermissionOTRS}} instead of {{OTRS pending}}. Look at this logfile. It is not okay to use that template exept you are a member of the support team, so every edit is being logged...
The second thing I have written is that you tell us via Mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org using the subject [Ticket#2015031710017141] when you uploaded a new batch. This would be great to have a documentation within the ticket and not in any (personal) archive of a commons page. Second reason is that my colleagues in the team can look after it when I have a break f.i.
Could you please handle this in the future like this? And please tell me, if you haven't understood something I have written. English is not my mother tongue so it could be that I write inscrutable stuff. Thanks a lot, regards, --Emha (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. In the future I will put {{OTRS pending}} and inform you via mail about new uploads. But what should I do with current pictures, which are already uplodaded? Should I change {{PermissionOTRS}} to {{OTRS pending}}? --Interfase (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have send a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about new photos from Ilgar Jafarov. --Interfase (talk) 02:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Interfase, Email arrived, thanks! No you don't have to undo your edits on current pictures. I have to check it :) It is very good that you create own categories for every batch of pictures. Kind Regards, --Emha (talk) 07:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emha. A mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about new photos from Ilgar Jafarov have been sent. --Interfase (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emha/Archive_1&oldid=163132915"