User talk:Discasto/Archive005

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pregunta[edit]

¿Esta foto no es subible y el de la izquierda no es don Jesús Gil y Gil, verdat? Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 11:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Asqueladd: Pues sí que parece Jesús Gil. Sobre si es subible, yo te diría que sí lo es, pero lamentablemente, los de Kutxateka no han hecho bien sus deberes y no han puesto bien la información de licencia, así que, por desgracia, no es subible :-( --Discasto talk 21:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
¿y este set de fotografías es subible?--Asqueladd (talk) 23:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Asqueladd: En mi modestísima opinión, si somos laxos, por supuesto que sí, ya que tienen una licencia compatible (ergo si lo subes no seré yo quien lo cuestione, me voy volviendo mayor). Sin embargo, si te soy sincero, no considero que todo sea subible, por varias razones: la primera es que no sabemos el estatus de la donación. Supongamos que se han cedido los derechos de explotación. Sin embargo, no creo que los donantes sean los propietarios de dichos derechos, sino los fotógrafos. Por lo que mi "dictamen" es el siguiente: fotos tomadas en España, antes del exilio de Blasco, sin autor identificado, podrían irse subiendo a medida que llegue el final de año correspondiente (las fotos de 1936, ya; las de 1937 a finales de este año...); las fotos tomadas en España, con autor identificado, creo que en general no deberían ser subidas; finalmente, las fotografías tomadas en Argentina podemos considerar que sí lo son puesto que fueron hechas hace el suficiente tiempo y, efectivamente, fueron publicadas, puesto que se le entregaron a Blasco. Aquí aplica mejor {{PD-AR}}, puesto que no es posible asignar CC a algo que está en el dominio público. Pero, lo dicho, no moveré un dedo si te amparas en lo afirmado por la Universidad de Sevilla :-) Un abrazo --Discasto talk 18:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Estadísticas WLE 2017[edit]

Hola. Antes que nada, disculpa por tardar en contestar. A veces leo un mensaje, pero estoy con otra cosa y lo dejo de momento, y luego se me olvida. El placer fue mío ya que hacía mucho tiempo que tenía ganas de conocer a varias personas, entre ellas tu. Me habría gustado poder charlar más, pero espero que se pueda dar una nueva ocasión. Muchas gracias de nuevo por las estadísticas. No las mencioné por presionar, sino porque de verdad merecías ese reconocimiento y agradecimiento. Tuvimos que añadir unas fotos al concurso, ya que el usuario no puso la plantilla en todas, así que no se si al final coincidirán las estadísticas, así como tampoco se si cuando empezaste con ellas habíamos terminado de arreglar todos los códigos de los LIC de las fotos. Respecto al premio, sí, me lo había comentado, y es algo a tener en cuenta en futuras ediciones de cualquier concurso. Muchas gracias. Y un fuerte abrazo. --Millars (talk) 22:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia for Peace[edit]

Hola

Las fotos que he visto que quitaste de la categoría Wikipedia for peace no estaban ahí por error. El programa del evento m:Wikipedia for Peace Madrid World Pride/Program and Ideas incluía explícitamente las actividades de tomar fotos en el Madrid Summit, y por ello son parte del resultado del evento.

Saludos Barcex (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Barcex: My mistake. Ya está todo (creo) corregido. Un saludo y perdón por las molestias. --Discasto talk 15:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Emakume euskaldunak[edit]

Gracias por tu mensaje! Y disculpa! Creé la categoría por desconocimiento. Intento eliminarla y asignar a las imágenes la categoría correcta. Si ves que no la he podido eliminar, toda tuya! Saludos cordiales! --193.125.5.250 14:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1 de enero, 2 de febrero, 3 de marzo...[edit]

¿Qué opinas de esto? ¿Te parece razonable para obviar el rollo ese del 1 de enero el año siguiente? A mí me lo parece. Strakhov (talk) 09:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Strakhov: De hecho, lo que rige es esto (disposición transitoria cuarta) y sí, parece que son ochenta años según lo que citas. No obstante, la confusión sobre el 1 de enero no viene de lo que dice este pollo, sino simplemente de la literalidad del artículo 30 de la ley actual. Así que no se trata (solo) de influjo americano. Saludos --Discasto talk 10:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Quizás los influjos gringos estén en la propia ley del 96... Gracias! :) Strakhov (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oye, ayuda[edit]

Quizás esto te suene más que a mí. es:Los Docks. ¿Puedes echarle el vistazo y criticarlo demoledoramente? La zona no es de las que tengo mejor conocidas de Madrid, la verdad. Empecé haciendo un copiapé rápido e indoloro de Madripedia, pero he comprobado que de Isabel Gea definitivamente uno no se puede fiar. Quedan un montón de los edificios en pie, ¿no? O eso me ha parecido ver. Strakhov (talk) 21:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Strakhov: Bueno, creo que lo has dejado muy bien. Efectivamente, quedan todavía los edificios de la parte sureste del antiguo complejo. Ahí están la Junta Municipal (que es de nueva planta) y el polideportivo Daoiz y Velarde (donde está esta placa). Hay algún edificio más, por ejemplo, el que está exactamente en la esquina, por supuesto no de principios del siglo XX, pero no sé decirte. El resto, hasta la calle del Comercio, está construido (de viviendas). Lo vas a ver muy bien aquí. Compara el plano de 1929 (los Docks son lo que ahí se llaman Cuarteles y Factorías Militares) con el PNOA de 2005 y lo verás claro. Esto quizá te clarifique algo también. Espero haber sido de ayuda. Un saludo --Discasto talk 22:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fiu. Eran enormes. ¡Muchas gracias! (no conocía la página de hecho). Por cierto, ¿madripedia cuándo resucitó? Strakhov (talk) 19:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carmena - “Frente al terrorismo, los Estados deben tener un comportamiento ejemplarizante” (05).jpg[edit]

File:Carmena - “Frente al terrorismo, los Estados deben tener un comportamiento ejemplarizante” (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

seb26 (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diario de Madrid[edit]

Hi Discasto,

Please consider creation of custom CC-license template like these. Sealle (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:La mesa sobre Violencia de Género reclama competencias para los Ayuntamientos destinadas a atajar esta lacra (09).jpg[edit]

File:La mesa sobre Violencia de Género reclama competencias para los Ayuntamientos destinadas a atajar esta lacra (09).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 04:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:La alcaldesa, en la inauguración de la muestra ‘Amnistía. Que trata de Spagna’ (04).jpg[edit]

File:La alcaldesa, en la inauguración de la muestra ‘Amnistía. Que trata de Spagna’ (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 19:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:La alcaldesa, en la inauguración de la muestra ‘Amnistía. Que trata de Spagna’ (03).jpg[edit]

File:La alcaldesa, en la inauguración de la muestra ‘Amnistía. Que trata de Spagna’ (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:La alcaldesa visita el Centro de Innovación de Carrefour (05).jpg[edit]

File:La alcaldesa visita el Centro de Innovación de Carrefour (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:La alcaldesa, en la inauguración de la muestra ‘Amnistía. Que trata de Spagna’ (05).jpg[edit]

File:La alcaldesa, en la inauguración de la muestra ‘Amnistía. Que trata de Spagna’ (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 19:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:La mesa sobre Violencia por Bandas Juveniles reclama un cambio de las políticas judiciales (03).jpg[edit]

File:La mesa sobre Violencia por Bandas Juveniles reclama un cambio de las políticas judiciales (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 19:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuela Carmena - “Las ciudades deben convertirse en reductos de conciencia” (03).jpg[edit]

File:Manuela Carmena - “Las ciudades deben convertirse en reductos de conciencia” (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 21:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuela Carmena recibe al Real Madrid de Baloncesto (06).jpg[edit]

File:Manuela Carmena recibe al Real Madrid de Baloncesto (06).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 21:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuela Carmena recibe al Real Madrid de Baloncesto (01).jpg[edit]

File:Manuela Carmena recibe al Real Madrid de Baloncesto (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 21:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid lleva a México un amplio programa cultural y literario con motivo de la FIL (03).jpg[edit]

File:Madrid lleva a México un amplio programa cultural y literario con motivo de la FIL (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 18:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mayer presenta la campaña ‘Fiestas libres de violencias machistas’ (03).jpg[edit]

File:Mayer presenta la campaña ‘Fiestas libres de violencias machistas’ (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mañana del domingo de San Isidro 2017 en imágenes - de la Banda Sinfónica Municipal a la lectura ininterrumpida de Gloria Fuertes (02).jpg[edit]

File:Mañana del domingo de San Isidro 2017 en imágenes - de la Banda Sinfónica Municipal a la lectura ininterrumpida de Gloria Fuertes (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 21:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (01).jpg[edit]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (02).jpg[edit]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 10:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (03).jpg[edit]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 10:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (04).jpg[edit]

File:“Los amores oscuros” da voz a la relación entre Lorca y su último gran amor (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 10:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Los alcaldes y alcaldesas no deben mandar, sino convencer” (01).jpg[edit]

File:“Los alcaldes y alcaldesas no deben mandar, sino convencer” (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 10:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (02).jpg[edit]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (09).jpg[edit]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (09).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (13).jpg[edit]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (13).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (14).jpg[edit]

File:Más de 1.200 asistentes a las charlas de TEDxMadridSalon en la Plaza Mayor (14).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quince propuestas de los Foros Locales aprobadas en Villa de Vallecas, Moratalaz, Tetuán, Chamartín, San Blas-Canillejas, Salamanca y Villaverde (01).jpg[edit]

File:Quince propuestas de los Foros Locales aprobadas en Villa de Vallecas, Moratalaz, Tetuán, Chamartín, San Blas-Canillejas, Salamanca y Villaverde (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 03:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Retrato estadístico fiable, conducta ejemplar de las instituciones, pequeños y grandes gestos, una suma necesaria para las ciudades de paz (02).jpg[edit]

File:Retrato estadístico fiable, conducta ejemplar de las instituciones, pequeños y grandes gestos, una suma necesaria para las ciudades de paz (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 03:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mauricio Valiente - “Lo más importante de las personas que luchan es el legado que dejan” (01).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mauricio Valiente - “Lo más importante de las personas que luchan es el legado que dejan” (01).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 04:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mauricio Valiente - “Lo más importante de las personas que luchan es el legado que dejan” (05).jpg[edit]

File:Mauricio Valiente - “Lo más importante de las personas que luchan es el legado que dejan” (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 04:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (01).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (01).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (02).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (02).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 00:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (03).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (03).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 00:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (04).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (04).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (07).jpg[edit]

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 01:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marta Higueras asiste al encuentro “Secretos de Cocina” (01).jpg[edit]

File:Marta Higueras asiste al encuentro “Secretos de Cocina” (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marta Higueras asiste al encuentro “Secretos de Cocina” (02).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Marta Higueras asiste al encuentro “Secretos de Cocina” (02).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 09:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Brilla Usera”, campaña para implicar a la ciudadanía en la limpieza del distrito (01).jpg[edit]

File:“Brilla Usera”, campaña para implicar a la ciudadanía en la limpieza del distrito (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 11:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:‘La noche de los mercados’, cultura gastronómica y vinícola para la ciudadanía (02).png[edit]

File:‘La noche de los mercados’, cultura gastronómica y vinícola para la ciudadanía (02).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 11:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (05).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (05).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 20:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navega con EMT por Madrid en autobús y en bici (02).jpg[edit]

File:Navega con EMT por Madrid en autobús y en bici (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (02).jpg[edit]

File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (04).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (04).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (05).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (05).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (06).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Premio Concordia a Rami Fernández, la primera profesora gitana con diversidad funcional (06).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vídeos para relatar la visión de los más jóvenes sobre la construcción de la paz (01).jpg[edit]

File:Vídeos para relatar la visión de los más jóvenes sobre la construcción de la paz (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 18:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Una gran exposición da arranque a los actos por el centenario de Gloria Fuertes (03).jpg[edit]

File:Una gran exposición da arranque a los actos por el centenario de Gloria Fuertes (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 21:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Una gran exposición da arranque a los actos por el centenario de Gloria Fuertes (02).jpg[edit]

File:Una gran exposición da arranque a los actos por el centenario de Gloria Fuertes (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 21:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page banner contest in Wiki Loves Earth 2017[edit]

Hi! Thank you for uploading page banners in Wiki Loves Earth 2017! Check out the results here. We look forward to your future contributions!

On behalf of the organizers, Alexander (talk) 21:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foto indicando outro autor[edit]

Hola, necesito un poco de ayuda con una foto: File:Andrea Maceiras.jpg. La ha subido un nuevo usuario pero indica que el autor es otra persona, que, en teoría, es otra escritora. ¿Que se debe hacer con esto? Saludos, --Elisardojm (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Descubre Madrid con Farolín y Monclovita (01).jpg[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Descubre Madrid con Farolín y Monclovita (01).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 23:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramio[edit]

Hola. ¿Podrías subcategorizar adecuadamente todas las fotos que estás subiendo de Panoramio y no dejarlas en la categoría raíz de ciudades? Gracias --Zarateman (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rectifico: compruebo que las subidas desde Panoramio las hace un bot --Zarateman (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zarateman: LOL, gracias por la rectificación. Efectivamente, estoy moviendo muchas fotos a Category:Madrid, pero fundamentalmente porque no tienen categoría y son inencontrables. Poco a poco las voy categorizando, pero lleva tiempo y tengo también otras fotos, que sí he subido yo (Category:Images from Ayuntamiento de Madrid (to classify)), que tengo también que categorizar. Todo lleva tiempo y mejor que estén localizadas en una categoría no muy precisa que perdidas por ahí. Un saludo --Discasto talk 19:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Te echaré una mano. Saludos --Zarateman (talk) 11:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ada Colau[edit]

Hola. Thanks for categorizing her files. If it will be easier for you you can try to search for "Ada Colau uncategorized". There are several more files with no cats at all. Gracias. --E4024 (talk) 14:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reversión en la cat: Parque Natural de las Marismas de Santoña, Victoria y Joyel[edit]

Hola, acabas de revertir la categorización del «Parque Natural de las Marismas de Santoña, Victoria y Joyel» en «Coasts of Cantabria», agtadezco tu atención en Commons, pero no entiendo muy bien el por qué de la reversión.

Si te fijas en mis últimas ediciones verás que estaba clasificando varias imágenes dentro de la cat. del Parque Natural. Esas imágenes estaban clasificadas dentro de «Coasts of Cantabria» y para no hacer una categorización circular eliminé de ellas la categoría «Coasts of Cantabria» y se la puse al Parque Natural (me pareció una buena solución).

Como está ahora creo que o recategorizamos el P.N. dentro de la cat. «Coasts of Cantabria», o recategorizamos todas las imágenes del parque. Tu dirás que piensas.--Juenti el toju (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Juenti el toju: Pues te digo. Dado que no todas las fotos del parque son fotos de la costa, es de sentido común categorizar solo lo que efectivamente sea costa. Un saludo --Discasto talk 20:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Discasto talk 20:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments en Venezuela 2017[edit]

Participa en Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 en Venezuela


Después de cuatro años de ausencia, te invitamos a participar del concurso de fotografía ganador del premio Guinness: Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 en Venezuela. Ayúdanos a preservar el patrimonio construido nacional, fotografía un monumento y gana premios!

  • ¿Cómo participar? Revisa con cuidado las reglas de participación, no es necesario que la fotografía sea actual, pero si es importante subirla de acá al 30 de septiembre.
  • ¿Conoces a algún fotógrafo interesado? Riega la voz, recuerda que nuestra misión es rescatar el patrimonio construido, viéndolo como parte importante del conocimiento que se pretende recoger y difundir en nuestro país.

¿Tienes alguna pregunta sobre el concurso? Envíanos un mensaje a info@wikimedia.org.ve. Oscar_. (talk) 15:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC) (Puedes suscribirse o darte de baja de futuras notificaciones de eventos en Venezuela añadiendo o quitando tu nombre de esta lista)[reply]

Artículo de Claudio Esteva Fabregat[edit]

Hola, a comienzos de 2016 escribiste en Wikiexilio este artículo biográfico que luego trasladamos ¿recuerdas? Pues resulta que hoy Claudio Esteva Fabregat lamentablemente ha fallecido ¿podrías echar un vistazo a los datos famliares (esposa(s), hijos) por favor? Al contrastar con las fuentes citadas no veo errores, pero mira el historial de hoy en es-wiki y dame tu opinión. Gracias y recibe un gran abrazo (¡Vaya tiempo sin saber nada de ti, hombre!) Mar del Sur (talk) 21:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

La información proviene de un usuario anónimo que afirma ser su hija y que ha editado hoy el artículo, agregando los nombres de pila de tres hijos de Claudio Esteva y Montserrat Saló. Buscando en la red, creo que se trata de esta escritora. El asunto es que ahora mismo el artículo da a entender que son seis sus hijos, tres de cada esposa (lo que posiblemente no sea el caso). El dato de los tres hijos con Berta Alcañiz lo incluiste tú con un referencia (esta) y además yo encontré esta otra fuente que afirma lo mismo... por eso es que tampoco me animo a retirar ese dato... :-( Un beso Mar del Sur (talk) 09:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mientras intentamos verificar, he preferido ocultar todo el párrafo. Mar del Sur (talk) 10:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mar del Sur: El problema es, como siempre, verificabilidad. Lo que parece razonable es que los tres hijos de C. Esteva fuesen de su primera mujer, y que no tuviera ninguno de la segunda. El dato no verificable es, por tanto, la existencia de la primera esposa, y que los tres hijos de C. Esteva lo fueran de ella, y no de su segunda, como afirman las fuentes. ¿Tú qué piensas? --Discasto talk 10:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yo también creo que tuvo una primera mujer y creo que tuvo hijos con ella. Si con la segunda (la única que consta en las fuentes) tuvo otros o no, pues no lo sé. Opino, como siempre, que es mejor ninguna información que una información dudosa o falsa. Así que nada, mientras no haya datos seguros, prefiero que no se diga nada al respecto. Menos con un personaje que acaba de fallecer... no sea que para obituarios y homenajes alguien quiera basarse en lo que hoy se ha agregado sin referencias, lo publique y allí ya la tenemos liada: información dudosa circularmente "referenciada". Eso. Mar del Sur (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mar del Sur: Entonces quizá habría que retocar el cuadro resumen e indicar, porque en esto no parece haber contradicción, que tuvo tres hijos. ¿Te parece? --Discasto talk 10:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No sé... es que si pongo "tres hijos" ahí en esa ficha, justo debajo de esa esposa (que es la única que nos consta) parecerá que son hijos de ella y eso es lo que se ha puesto en duda (a pesar de las fuentes). Por otra parte, Google no da ningún resultado para las búsqueda (con comillas) "Esteva Alcañiz" ni tampoco para "Esteva Alcanyis", pero sí arroja justamente tres personas con apellidos "Esteva Saló": Mireia, Claudio y Miguel Ángel, lo que comprueba (en parte) lo editado hoy por la IP. Mar del Sur (talk) 11:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:All media supported by Basque Wikimedians User Group in 2017[edit]

Hola Discasto! No me estraña que te haya quedado perplejo! He metido a la categoría All media supported by Basque Wikimedians User Group in 2017 todas la imagenes de "Images from Donostia Kultura" sin darme cuenta que algunas no las había subido yo. Soy miembro del BWUG y últimamente he estado pasando las fotos de Flick de Donostia Kultura (donde trabajo) a Commons. Pero claro, no había caído que tú también habias hecho parte de ese trabajo. La intención de la categoría es simplemente contabilizar las imagenes aportadas a Commons desde BWUG. Podemos quitar de la categoría las imagenes que hayas subido tú u otros usuario, o si no, borrar directamente la categoria, tampoco tiene tanto importancia. --Xabier Cañas (talk) 08:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xabier Cañas: LOL
Lo entiendo. Yo una vez categoricé erróneamente varios miles de fotos y tuve que poner un bot a deshacerlo :-DDDDD
Como vas a tener que ir mirando una a una qué fotos son las que subí yo, mejor lo hago yo, que están en mi lista de seguimiento. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 09:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Xabier Cañas: Arreglado. Un saludo --Discasto talk 09:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Muchas gracias @Discasto: por el currazo!! Andaré con más cuidado la próxima vez! Un saludo!

...[edit]

¿Sabrías cuál sería acá, si existe, la plantilla para señalar que respecto a una imagen (mapa por ejemplo) existen dudas sobre la veracidad, fiabilidad, verificabilidad, etc? ~Saludos. Strakhov (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Strakhov: Aparentemente es {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}}. Pero nunca lo he usado :-( --Discasto talk 18:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias! Creo que me vale. Strakhov (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foto de diputados.[edit]

Buenos días. En enero de 2017, solicitaste la supresión de fotografías de diputados que había importado desde la web del Congreso (lo puedes ver aquí). Y eso paso pese al aviso legal del Congreso que lo avala. Ahora, voy que la foto [[File:José Manuel Maza 2017.png]] utiliza exactamente el mismo argumentario que el mío y que figura en el aviso legal. Pero no hay problema en autorizar esta foto. ¿Porqué? ¿Cuáles son las diferencias? --FructidorAn3 (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Spain without BIC template[edit]

Buenas, entiendo que esta categoría no aplica (o bien no es problemática) cuando se trata de imágenes de municipios sin foto. Ahí no se puede esperar la plantilla de BIC (a no ser que la imagen sea válida como WLM y como NMESF). Por eso excluiría de esta categoría las imágenes con la plantilla {{Ningún municipio sin fotografía}}. Gracias por tu ayuda y un saludo! Poco2 18:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco: Hola Diego. Pues sí, tienes toda la razón. Como ya le dije a Rubén, ando fatal de tiempo e hice algo muy de andar por casa. En cuanto tenga un minuto, reprogramo el bot para que omita las imágenes con esta plantilla. Un abrazo --Discasto talk 20:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Perfecto, muchas gracias. Poco2 21:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Otra cosilla. La categoría de mantenimiento "Images uploaded to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 via the 'es' campaign", ¿qué propósito tiene? Lo digo porque las que efectivamente se suben con la campaña reciben la categoría "Uploaded via Campaign:wlm-es" de forma automática. Yo las subo "a pelo" con el Upload Wizard. Saludos! Poco2 16:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Bueno, a lo mejor el nombre no es el más correcto. Rubén me pidió distinguir entre las fotos subidas como parte del concurso de WM-ES y las relativas a otras organizaciones. Si crees que hay un nombre mejor, sin problema. Propónmelo y lo cambio. Un saludo --Discasto talk 17:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, ok, entiendo. Bueno, era más curiosidad que otra cosa, cambiarlo ahora, dado que no le incumbe más que a "cuatro" usuarios tampoco vale la pena. Saludos, Poco2 17:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos El diario[edit]

El sitio está claro. Son de licencia libre y commons todas aquellas fotos por las que no haya en el artículo una referencia a europapress o agencias terceras. He elegido imagenes que no tenían estas menciones. Entonces, no hay que borrarlas porque no hay NINGUNA referencia a europapress en los artículos en cuestiones. --FructidorAn3 (talk) 05:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FructidorAn3: Me da la impresión de que no tienes muy claro el tema de las licencias. Con eldiario.es pisamos un terreno extremadamente resbaladizo. Hemos estado a un tris de que, simplemente, se incluya a eldiario.es en la lista de sitios no confiables y, por tanto, que no se pueda subir ninguna foto. Yo he subido muchas con una única condición: que aparezcan firmadas (la foto, no el artículo) y que podamos garantizar, con cierta seguridad, que se trata de fotógrafos del periódico. Por eso existen categorías como esta. Por eso voy a solicitar el borrado de todas las fotos que no sean de eldiario.es y, por eso, voy a procurar que irresponsables como tú no jodan una fuente que, a pesar de todo, proporciona muchas imágenes valiosas. Si, a pesar de todo esto, sigues subiendo imágenes incorrectas, no dudaré en pedir tu bloqueo. Espero tu comprensión. Un saludo --Discasto talk 07:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Qué amabilidad por alguién que ya no es administrador desde hace tres años... ¿un enlace a lo que se refiere? --FructidorAn3 (talk) 07:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@FructidorAn3: No creo haber dejado de ser amable en ningún momento. Otra cosa es que tú interpretes la amabilidad como dejarte hacer lo que te venga en gana. Las condiciones de la licencia de eldiario.es son muy claras, especialmente en lo relacionado con las "excepciones" (lo cual también es bastante lógico; las agencias de noticias ceden el uso de las fotos pero no su propiedad intelectual... eldiario.es no puede relicenciar algo que no es suyo). Tú pareces creer que el trabajo que lleva revisar tu ingente producción de violaciones de copyright es gratis... pues no, no lo es y, ante tu persistencia en violar los términos de la licencia de Wikimedia Commons, la solución más simple y efectiva es que dejes de subir material. No se trata de maldad, al menos por mi parte, sino simplemente de proteger a los miembros de buena fe de la comunidad que no tienen por qué perder su tiempo con alguien que no quiere comprender cómo funciona esto. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 07:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC) PS: no sé si es esto lo que buscas[reply]
Entonces, el problema viene del sitio que no menciona que las fotos vienen de agencias. Y nunca tuve la intención de "parasitar" porque sino NUNCA hubiera buscado artículos que no mencionan agencias porque hubiera subido todo lo que viera..! --FructidorAn3 (talk) 08:05, 25 September 2017 (UTC) PS : Estoy escribiendo al diario par avisarles y tener su opinión.[reply]

University and Historic Precinct of Alcalá de Henares[edit]

Hola Discato:

En el documento http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/876.pdf tienes el listado de los edificios que son Patrimonio de la Humanidad en Alcalá de Henares. Mira la página nº 125: Anexo II: Inventario de monumentos. Un cordial saludo:--Raimundo Pastor (talk) 17:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Esos mapas destacan y enumeran consecutivamente los "Monumentos Nacionales" y los "Edificios de Protección Integral de Alcalá de Henares", pero este Patrimonio de la Humanidad realmente delimita un recinto de la ciudad (Precinct of Alcalá de Henares) que en los mapas se marca con una línea roja (LÍMITES DEL BIEN PM - 78,38 Ha. WH PROPERTY BOUNDARIES) por lo que hay que incluir todos los edificios históricos relacionados con la Universidad que están dentro de ese marco. Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leyendo tu comentario, asumes que eres el único que tienes razón y que puedes cambiar a tu antojo lo que realizan los demás. Yo te he dado mis argumentos y te he indicado en la documentación que me baso. Creo que es tan digno como tu argumentación. Yo te respeto, pero no estoy de acuerdo en tu criterio para no incluir a determinados monumentos en esta categoría. Creo que debemos buscar un acuerdo basándonos en una documentación que concrete sin discusión los criterios de inclusión o exclusión. Un saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 20:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Limpieza[edit]

✓ Done Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Bordes[edit]

Sí, gracias.--Canaan (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete all my files[edit]

as you suggested. I stated where the files are coming from and since the sources were published before 1920 there is no ISBN - ALL my files are out of copyright in the US - please read:

"Work made for hire Photographers don’t own the copyright for images that they take when those images fall into the “work made for hire” category. A work-made-for-hire relationship is created in two situations:

The photographer is an employee hired to photograph for the employer—an example would be a photojournalist who is an employee of a newspaper..."

"If an image is used in a newsworthy item then that constitutes an editorial use. In such cases, a person’s rights are evaluated in light of constitutional interests. “Newsworthiness” is a First Amendment, freedom of the press interest and is broadly construed. Courts traditionally have defined public interest or newsworthiness in liberal and far-reaching terms, not limiting it to the dissemination of news in the sense of current events. They have extended it well beyond that to include all types of factual, educational and historical data, even including entertainment and amusement and other interesting phases of human activity in general."

I reside in the US and all I asked (when uploading files) is whether the file is out of copyright in the US. I have found some other instances [from other users] where files come from the same sources as mine so I'd appreciate it if you delete them too. GinnevraDubois (talk) 01:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

more[edit]

Please note that according to the latest Spanish law (WRT photographers' rights) "únicamente se le reconoce sus derechos por un periodo limitado a 25 años y únicamente los derechos de reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública, no así por ejemplo el derecho de transformación." - Creo que esto da motivo a debate con respecto a si las fotografías tomadas hace cien años todavía están bajo derechos de autor en España. Lo que no estoy segura es de si esta ley se aplica solo a las fotografías a partir de la fecha de la promulgación de la ley. La ley de derecho de los 70 años a partir de la muerte del autor solo se refiere a fotografías consideradas "obras de arte" y no creo que las imágenes ilustrativas de eventos noticiosos sean consideradas como tales. Por otra parte, España, así como la unión europea permite el uso no lucrativo de imágenes para fines ilustrativos de noticias o de hechos históricos, entre otros. Todo esto lo puede ver en el internet.

Una foto que su autor dice que no la quiere licenciar de forma libre[edit]

Hola: Me pongo en contacto contigo por que un compañero fotógrafo me ha llamado diciendo que hay una foto suya en Commons que no quiere que esté ya que no quiere que se use de forma libre. Me pregunta a ver como se puede borrar... la foto es https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Leire_Bilbao.jpg y el autor es Iban Gorriti, Según veo en su ficha, al fotografía la subió Loren Agirrezabal desde https://www.flickr.com/photos/donostiakultura/25626293493/in/dateposted-public/ de Donostia Kultura. ¿como hay que hacer para que se borre? Muchas gracias Un abrazo. Txo (discusión) Mi discusión en castellano 14:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Txo: Pues no sé si es posible, la verdad. El problema está en que Donostia Kultura ha usado una licencia CC. Y las licencias CC no se pueden revocar. No sé qué responderte, la verdad. Puedo preguntar. Un abrazo --Discasto talk 16:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Muchas gracias... pregunta por favor. Txo (discusión) Mi discusión en castellano 20:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: eldiario.es[edit]

Hola, Discasto.

Muchas gracias por tus explicaciones. Muy valiosas y me aclaran muchas dudas.

Por cierto, hablando de eldiario.es y Robert Bonet, eso quiere decir que este usuario no tiene razón al eliminar esta foto de la wiki inglesa, que tú mismo subiste: [1] Voy a recuperar la edición, espero no tener problemas.

Te agradezco de nuevo tu amabilidad y la molestia que te has tomado con una explicación tan detallada. :)

Saludos cordiales. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 22:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

¡Me muero...! Qué baile de ediciones... ¡qué coordinación! :D --BallenaBlanca (talk) 23:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Por cierto, aprovecho para preguntarte ¿formas parte del equipo de OTRS? Te lo pregunto por esto. No se trata de meter prisa, la revisión llevará el tiempo que lleve (eso lo entiendo, ¡por supuesto!, aquí somos todos voluntarios y dedicamos el tiempo que podemos y cuando podemos) pero no puedo saber si se ha traspapelado el correo o no ha llegado (no sería la primera vez que me ocurre).
Un abrazo. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 23:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@BallenaBlanca: No, lo siento. Soy un apestado de la comunidad wikipédica española, así que malamente puedo ser miembro de OTRS :-P. @Cookie: , ¿sabes quién está activo en OTRS? --Discasto talk 23:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Tengo esta contestación de hace unos días [2], pero me pareció un poco "seca" y tenía la esperanza, al ver que eres una persona comunicativa y muy amable, de que tú me pudieras arrojar algo de luz. Muchas gracias de todos modos. Un abrazo. PD: no serás tan "apestado", hombre! ;-) --BallenaBlanca (talk) 23:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@BallenaBlanca: LOL --Discasto talk 20:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
He contactado con Ezarate a ver si puede echar un vistazo. Y ya que he pasado por aquí también he borrado la foto. El asunto está claro así que para qué esperar la semana de rigor, también hay atasco en las DRs. Un saludo a ambos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Muchas gracias a ambos, Discasto y @Cookie: . Ya estoy en contacto con Ezarate. ¡Muy amables todos!
Una preugnta para ti, Discasto. ¿Esta imagen es libre "Manifestantes lanzan vallas a la policía, en Barcelona. FOTO: AP Photo/Manu Fernández."
Abrazos para todos. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 09:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@BallenaBlanca: Obviamente, no :-). AP stands for Associated Press. O sea, que la foto es de agencia, como casi todas :-( --Discasto talk 12:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Estupendo @BallenaBlanca: , espero que se solucione todo :-) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 15:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ezarate lo ha solucionado y el vídeo ya está disponible [3]. ¡No sé cómo daros las gracias a todos por vuestra ayuda, de verdad! Menos mal que estáis ahí... ;-) Un enorme abrazo a Ezarate, Cookie y Discasto. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 23:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
¡Qué rapidez! Esto sí que es trabajo colaborativo y eficiente. Muchas gracias Ezarate. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About Photo size[edit]

As I said in the delete page, take an example from File:Arbós advierte del riesgo de reformar la Constitución por la vía rápida, como se hizo con el 135.jpg:

website: http://www.eldiario.es/catalunya/politica/sirve-convocar-elecciones_0_699230879.html
website image URL: http://images.eldiario.es/catalunyaplural/Xavier-Universitat-Barcelona-ENRIC-CATALA_EDIIMA20150819_0016_4.jpg
full image URL: http://images.eldiario.es/catalunyaplural/Xavier-Universitat-Barcelona-ENRIC-CATALA_EDIIMA20150819_0016_1.jpg

If you need other photo size, we could change number:

example 1: http://images.eldiario.es/catalunyaplural/Xavier-Universitat-Barcelona-ENRIC-CATALA_EDIIMA20150819_0016_2.jpg
example 2: http://images.eldiario.es/catalunyaplural/Xavier-Universitat-Barcelona-ENRIC-CATALA_EDIIMA20150819_0016_10.jpg
example 3: http://images.eldiario.es/catalunyaplural/Xavier-Universitat-Barcelona-ENRIC-CATALA_EDIIMA20150819_0016_14.jpg
I dont think so. This photo is same photo (http://images.eldiario.es/catalunyaplural/Xavier-Universitat-Barcelona-ENRIC-CATALA_EDIIMA20150819_0016_1.jpg), website uses the same technology change photo size.--KOKUYO (talk) 21:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is like VOA, VOA even could change URL to add logo:
website: https://www.voachinese.com/a/KMT-COMMENORATES-72ND-ANNIVERSARY-OF-WWll/4085286.html
website image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w1023_r1_s.jpg
no logo image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w1023_r1.jpg
full image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA.jpg
other image size 123: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w123_r1.jpg
other image size 456: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w456_r1.jpg
other image size 789: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w789_r1.jpg
--KOKUYO (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be unfriendly....And in this page (http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/), I think it means all website content/contenido (except content from EFE, AP...., or comic) use CC-BY-SA. This page use "contenido", not "published content".--KOKUYO (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"eldiario.es utiliza una licencia Creative Commons. Concretamente la más abierta de todas: la BY-SA". Of couse, http://images.eldiario.es=eldiario.es. Otherwise, You could not download image.--KOKUYO (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Robert Bonet-->We can create "Category:Robert Bonet"
Sandra Lázaro -->You say could not update.
At least 21 photos only tag "SANDRA LÁZARO" (example), like Robert Bonet photos (example).--KOKUYO (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CropTool[edit]

In the future, I would appreciate it if you used CropTool to crop images. This tool allows users to crop images already on Commons without having to download the images. It also makes sure that, if necessary, the file has already passed license review. It also properly links the images to one another, in case an issue with them comes up later. Elisfkc (talk) 14:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: I don't know what you're talking about. Which of my 28,000 uploads you're refering to? --Discasto talk 17:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Amadeu Altafaj, cap adjunt del Gabinet del vicepresident econòmic de la Comissió Europea.jpg is the one I'm referring to. --Elisfkc (talk) 21:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: Ohh, I see. Let me then clarify some aspects:
  1. I use frequently CropTool. It works fine, but has a little drawback: it requires the cropped image to be already in Commons. In the picture you mention, the uncropped image was not in commons, so that your "suggestion" is pointless and inconsiderate.
  2. I'll upload images to commons in the way I decide, not in the way you appreciate. I always use CroopTool for cropping images already in Commons. My uploads are mine and I decide whether an entire image I've found somewhere or just a portion is uploaded. If you don't want to review images, don't do it. All of us are volunteers.
  3. In general, don't use predefined messages when talking to other users, especially when said users have uploaded more images than you, has been in commons for more than 12 years (that is, three times more than you) and has been even an admin. Especially when you are wrong (as, again, no image in commons has been cropped). Thanks --Discasto talk 23:56, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, considering I'm constantly reviewing images, I don't have time to see if everyone has been on here more than me, or if they are an admin. It is just a suggestion, that is all. Elisfkc (talk) 23:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: Well, considering that your suggestion is useless, maybe you'd better verify whether CropTool can be used before suggesting to use it. Is it that difficult to understand or should I explain it to you again? --Discasto talk 00:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:¿Qué hacemos con esto?[edit]

Eso de la no desnaturalización me recuerda este caso, aunque en Moncloa no se menciona explícitamente ninguna licencia CC las condiciones son las mismas que las descritas en GC. En esta frasecita:
De conformidad con esta normativa, la Administración permite la reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública de la obra y, además, la transformación de la obra para hacer obras derivadas, por todo el mundo y sin ninguna limitación temporal,... no habla nada de uso comercial.
En el apartado "Otras modalidades de reutilización" dice:
La reutilización de obras protegidas por la propiedad intelectual se puede formalizar mediante el uso de licencias de difusión abierta, como las de Creative Commons, que ceden determinados derechos de explotación de las obras. En los contenidos en los que se aplique este tipo de licencias, se permite la reutilización en las condiciones que se establezcan en las mismas.
No concreta qué tipo (o tipos) de CC se aplica a los contenidos y como digo, tampoco menciona el uso comercial, así que, en mi opinión ni esta ni todas estas cumplen los requisitos de Commons. Pero sería cosa de abrir una DR para exponer el asunto porque sino se puede armar. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC) P.D: Y de momento, el discurso político sobra, no es para Commons y ya ni siquiera está visible la referencia.[reply]

@Cookie: Nope. Ya está discutido y validado: Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Attribution-gencat --Discasto talk 21:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pues, no estoy de acuerdo. Pero bueno, en vista de los defensores igual es mejor no desencadenar un conflicto diplomático :-| Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gencat[edit]

Hola, no sé porque motivo quieres eliminar todas estas imágenes porque son del web de la Generalitat, cuyo aviso legal permite reproducirlas. --Davidpar (disc.) 18:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidpar: ¿Eliminar? Nada más lejos de mi intención. De hecho, estoy validando la licencia de las imágenes provenientes de dicha web (ejemplo), pero para poder hacerlo, es preciso que la foto venga de dicha web. Incluir una URL que no es la de donde está la foto no sirve para nada. Si puedes buscar la fuente y ponerla, la validación se hará sin problemas. Perdón por las molestias y un saludo --Discasto talk 18:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Traslado de Categoría[edit]

Soy consciente de que las categorías deben estar en inglés, pero hay muchas en español. este traslado si en puridad es correcto, hace que quede raro en la categoría contenedor al estar todas en español y sólo está en inglés. ¿Puedo revertir? Triplecaña (talk) 14:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Triplecaña: Hola, si mal no recuerdo, trasladé porque, en general, se denominan así: Category:Train stations in Madrid. Un saludo --Discasto talk 21:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirna Lacambra.jpg & other images[edit]

Since you Dicasto are a license reviewer, why don't you just mark these images...if you didn't upload them? You would understand Catalan/Spanish copyright laws better, too. Ordering a license review for an image that you did not upload does not make sense to me. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: Sure, you're completely right. I've massively marked a lot of images for review, and step by step I'm reviewing them, but it's also possible other reviewers review them. Don't blame on me :-) --Discasto talk 11:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Leoboudv: As you've possibly noticed, I'm sorting the images from Generalitat de Catalunya. It translates into a lot of images being properly verified and categorized... and some being deleted as no actual source can be determined. I'm trying to find the source for images that have changed its location, but not all of them seem to be available any more... Bad luck :-( --Discasto talk 11:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

source was under internet archive for this image. Forgot to check there.

File:Joan Tardà, durante su intervención en el Congreso de los Diputados.jpg[edit]

If you can find the source for this image, feel free to give it...and consider passing this image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: Hi, I have some concerns abotu KOKUYO's uploads (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KOKUYO). My main concern is that these high quality pictures are actually available at eldiario.es's site, but not from any article. KOKUYO has been clever enough to find out the URL of the high resolution copies (by changing the last character in the file name) but I don't think these copies are covered by eldiario.es license. What do you think? --Discasto talk 13:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • If that is true, then a DR may be in order. I always thought that as long as the right author is attributed, it should be OK since people manipulate image to increase the resolution sometimes. But I will look at the DR. I have not commented in the DR but you should make your concerns known to an Admin about whether thee is permission for the higher resolution images. An Admin like Jcb can give a better reply. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Vázquez Montalbán.jpg[edit]

If a source cannot be found for this heavily used image (I could not find it under Internet archive), I suggest it be tagged as "no source" sadly. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: . Done --Discasto talk 10:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing permission[edit]

Hi! You've requested permission for the files File:Francisco J. San Román.jpg and File:Edgar Sengier.jpg. Both are from mindat.org and uploaded with the especificied permission showed on the page. What's wrong? Thanks! --Yuanga (talk) 20:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yuanga: ¡Tienes razón! No había visto el enlace a la información de licencia (no es obvio). Sin embargo, tengo serias dudas sobre el estatus de copyright de las imágenes. Parece que se trata de algo parecido a una wiki en la que los usuarios suben fotos. Un saludo --Discasto talk 22:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Discasto: Cierto. ¿Hay algún protocolo para estos casos? En mindat se indica una licencia que nos permite su uso. Debería ser mindat quién rechazase el archivo, no? --Yuanga (talk) 20:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuanga: Bueno, el protocolo es bastante claro: usuario del montón (yo) expone sus dudas. Otros usuarios (tú, por ejemplo) dan su opinión. Un administrador juzga la "bondad" de los argumentos, de acuerdo con las políticas. Personalmente, para que algo esté en el dominio público, hay que proporcionar evidencias. Que alguien haya subido algo a una web y diga que está en el dominio público no es algo útil. Espero haber respondido a tu pregunta. Un saludo --Discasto talk 21:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader[edit]

Hola Discasto, técnicamente esto no me parece del todo correcto. Ya sé que la original la has subido tú (aunque no sea tampoco tuya), y por eso le he puesto debidamente la atribución. Técnicamente la imagen recortada la he subido yo, derivando una obra previamente subida por ti, que a su vez es una obra licenciada por un tercero. No es que me importe, tan solo quería saber si es habitual atribuirse uploads con este tipo de categorías, incluso cuando se trata de obras derivadas realizadas por otros. Un saludo. -- Leoncastro (talk) 21:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoncastro: Hola, gracias por compartir tus inquietudes. Te diré lo que hago yo: me atribuyo (en una categoría que, por lo demás, es una categoría oculta e invisible para el 99 por ciento de los lectores) obras derivadas de imágenes que he subido yo del mismo modo que no me atribuyo imágenes recortadas de imágenes que han subido otros (esta es la última que he subido). Me gusta llevar estadísticas del impacto de mis fotos y de las imágenes que yo he subido (por supuesto que podría crear una categoría del tipo Category:Crops of images uploaded by User:Discasto, pero no quería rizar el rizo). Por supuesto que si te incomoda puedes borrarlo. Por supuesto también, si no quieres establecer ninguna relación con la imagen que he subido yo, no incluyas la plantilla de obra derivada ({{ExtractedFrom}}) y coloca la plantilla {{FlickrReview}}. Así se verificará independientemente. Pero lo dicho, si te incomoda, siéntete libre de eliminarla. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 22:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por la explicación. Ya he mencionado anteriormente que no me importa. En mi inexperiencia en Commons es la primera vez que veo ese tipo de categorías, y me ha causado extrañeza. Aunque por tu explicación entiendo que dada la naturaleza de la categoría, tampoco quieras complicarla más. -- Leoncastro (talk) 22:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These 3 images below[edit]

Dear Dicasto,

  • If you can find the source for these 3 images please feel free to do so and pass the first 2 images. As for the third, you uploaded the image on October 30, 2017 and the source is already not functional.

Best, --https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Secci%C3%B3_infantil_del_bibliob%C3%BAs_Garrigues-Segri%C3%A0.JPG (talk) 06:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: I've fixed the last ones. As for the first two... I already tried to find the source, with no luck :-( --Discasto talk 17:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Para tu solaz[edit]

¿Si se cambia el estatus de la plantilla compartirás conmigo el solaz verificando la fuente de las chiquicientas imágenes que tendré que restaurar? LOL Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cookie: Sabes que sí, aunque el problema va a ser que ya no estarán donde estaban antes y eso sí es un problema :-P (el otro es si vas a saber cuáles son las imágenes que hay que restaurar) --Discasto talk 09:28, 22 November 2017 (UTC) PS: de hecho, estaba pensando en subir masivamente todas las imágenes de las galerías multimedia, pero eso ya es otro asunto, en el que habrá que ver cómo se verifica la licencia.[reply]
Tu primer problema es un problema menor, ya se las devolverá poco a poco a su bujero si son más adecuadas que las sustitutas. Y no problem con el segundo. El resumen de borrado que puse en todas fue: (Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: http://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/es_AvisoLegal.htm The terms have changed, so not compatible with WC anymore). Hice oficial el cambio de licencia en la plantilla el 2 de julio de 2014 (tú lo precisaste más unos días después) y en días posteriores de ese mismo mes es cuando empecé a borrar. El año anterior había hecho el primer cambio de fecha, errónea, pero según veo aquí restauré todas, excepto tres que revisaré. Solo es cuestión de recorrer el registro de borrados a partir de esa fecha. A medida que vaya restaurando añado una categoría temporal (ya pensaremos el título) hasta verificar si la fuente sigue apuntando a la imagen y si se pueden/deben colocar en su artículo original, después se quita la categoría y listo. ¿vale? Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:30, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These 3 images[edit]

Dear Dicasto,

If you can find a source for these 3 images, please feel free to do so and pass them. If not feel free to tag them as no source.

Unfortunately some of them were uploaded up to 5 years ago. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: I fixed one, but could not fix the other two :-( --Discasto talk 18:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Respuesta[edit]

Parece el consuegro, sí. Le echaré un ojo.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Por cierto, aparte de Alcalá-Zamora, Queipo de Llano e Indalecio Prieto ¿pueden que salgan en la imagen también Luis de Zulueta y Rafael Sánchez-Guerra?--Asqueladd (talk) 01:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cognitive dissonance[edit]

En es:Elecciones municipales de 1931 en Madrid sale como concejal (¿proclamado?) electo del distrito de Chamberí Dionisio García (Guerrero). Esto se enturbia con la lectura del Boletín Oficial de la Provincia de Madrid:

Que notifica entre los proclamados electos a Ramón de Madariaga Alonso.

Adicionalmente, en el número 1790 del Boletín del Ayuntamiento de Madrid de 22 de abril de 1931, se da cuenta de dos informaciones:

  • En las actas de las Sesión Extraordinaria del día 14 de abril de 1931 del Ayuntamiento (pp. 337-338) se informa de la lectura de una comunicación del secretario de la Junta Municipal del Censo dando cuenta de los resultados, notificando a Dionisio García Guerrero como quinto concejal del distrito de Chamberí en número de votos.
  • En el Aviso de la Junta Municipal del Censo Electoral de Madrid firmado por "el vicepresidente" Francisco Casas Gago (entiendo que es la mismita persona que la del BOPM) el 16 de abril (ppp. 347-348) sale Ramón de Madariaga y Alonso como quinto concejal proclamado electo del distrito de Chamberí.

¿Entiendo que lo bueno y menos provisional es la segunda información? En cualquier caso, lo que hay ahora está referenciado con fuentes primarias o secundarias? Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 01:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Asqueladd: Hola, pues la verdad es que no sé decirte. Tengo que localizar en mi biblioteca el librito de Tusell y veré si saqué de ahí los datos. Si no, es posible que la lista la sacase de la referencia de ABC. Ambas referencias (ABC y la segunda que citas) son consistentes señalando a García Guerrero como quinto candidato más votado. Las otras dos indican que finalmente fue proclamado Madariaga. Parece que tenemos un punto ciego (¿por qué no fue el candidato más votado el proclamado?) que parece complicado aclarar. Quizá el artículo como está, indicando como nota que García Guerrero no fue finalmente proclamado, siendo Madariaga el que finalmente resultó proclamado. Miraré lo de Tusell, pero me extrañaría que tuviese más datos. Un saludo --Discasto talk 07:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC) PS: eso sí, Madariaga era también monárquico PS2: peor aún, La Vanguardia dice que fue Madariaga el más votado[reply]
@Asqueladd: Te confirmo que Tusell no incluye resultados por candidatura en estas elecciones. --Discasto talk 22:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mapas de 1873 con anacronismo[edit]

Creo que en los mapas de la I república empleados para describir la rebelión cantonal debería, o bien especificarse en el propio archivo de imagen que se trata de un mapa explicado sobre la división territorial actual (algo que no se hace). O bien explicarlo sobre las fronteras de la época (que en materia regional eran distintas). De lo contrario se está cometiendo un anacronismo. De ahí que considere un error que la opción que elijas sea la de un archivo de imagen con las autonomías actuales, que son distintas de las regiones de 1873, sin especificar en el archivo de imagen este hecho. Un saludo Ramajero — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramajero (talk • contribs) 12:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:October 1 referendum results.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:October 1 referendum results.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:October 1 referendum results.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restaurando[edit]

He empezado. Están en Category:Restored GobiernoEspaña files. Cuando termine, si tú no puedes, verificaré fuente y limpiaré categorías erróneas, plantilla inventada, etc. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


www.lamoncloa.gob.es[edit]

Dear Dicasto, If an image file from www.lamoncloa.gob.es has a dead source, please feel free to tag it as no source if you did not upload it...rather than having me or a third person do it. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Imágenes perdidas[edit]

Anoche pensaba precisamente en lo mismo mientras buscaba la fuente de File:Zapatero entrevistado en Julia en la onda.jpg, tuve que subir otra versión porque al parecer la que teníamos la han eliminado del sitio.
Pienso que si en su momento se subió una imagen con la url exacta, no es un fraude y no es culpa de Commons si el sitio ha decidido eliminarla o moverla y su búsqueda interna no da con ella. Al igual que las imágenes de flirck se mantienen aunque los usuarios las eliminen de su cuenta o les cambien la licencia, estas deberían permanecer también. Las instituciones, webs, etc, son muy dueñas de hacer lo que quieran con su material, tienen todos los derechos sobre ellas, pero la copia subida a Commons, si tiene la fuente -hasta alguna de ellas con la procedencia en los datos EXIF- debe considerarse legítima, aunque la referencia no continúe visible. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Se ha cruzado mi mensaje y tu posdata. Pues eso, que vale la categoría como temporal, mientras se intenta encontrar la fuente actual, pero si no se encuentra y según lo dicho arriba la fuente es legítima se queda y se retira de esa categoría. ¿Deberíamos consultarlo en el Village por si somos demasiado atrevidos con el planteamiento? Las dos derivadas están restauradas, mira a ver si está todo correcto. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hecho aquí. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Todas hechas, aunque de momento no he borrado ninguna antigua. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Otra encontrada. Con las restantes me doy por vencida, no están. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A similar case to the lamoncloa images[edit]

Dear Discasto,

When old image files are submitted for review, I am normally supposed to mark them or try to find sources to them. Please see this edit by Admin Lymantria to a user who uploaded images of moths from 2008-2015...but they were never reviewed. Now, once they were submitted for review around October 2017, some image sources were already deleted. Eventually Lymantria and I managed to find sources for many--but not all--of these older images on the user's talkpage from October 2017 with Internet archive. Sadly, Internet archive misses many pages. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • PS: In this list of short messages dated to October 31, 2017, it became apparent that the uploader could not be designated a trusted user since he accidentally uploaded at least one NC image as Lymantria noticed. So, the result is some of his older images could not be saved. lamoncloa should not be a problem but technically we are supposed to review images uploaded from them too. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dome vs ceiling[edit]

¿Dome es para las vistas exteriores y Ceiling para las interiores? Category:Dome of the Cathedral of Our Lady of La Almudena Txitxo1 (talk) 22:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Txitxo1: Si te soy sincero... no tengo ni idea :-( --Discasto talk 22:07, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Txitxo1 and Discasto: Si me permitís, mi intuición me dice que 'dome' equivale a 'cúpula', en general, y que 'ceiling' hace referencia a 'techo' en general (visto desde dentro, creo, no vistas aéreas, más o menos como en castellano; y no solo de cúpulas, sino cualquier techo). A primera vista la categoría Category:Church domes (general: exterior e interior) tiene la subcategoría Category:Church dome interiors (entiendo que solo para interiores). Saludos. strakhov (talk) 22:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uncategorized images of Madrid[edit]

vaciada Ha sido muy interesante tratar de identificar todo. Un saludo Txitxo1 (talk) 14:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Txitxo1: Esta tampoco está mal ;-) --Discasto talk 21:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Discasto: Muchísimo más complicada al no haber coordinates. Txitxo1 (talk) 21:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Walking around Madrid - Puma Sneakers and Lucky Brand Jeans.JPG. ¿Si es totalmente imposible localizar se puede sacar de la categoría o se queda ahí para siempre? Txitxo1 (talk) 17:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Txitxo1: Yo las dejaría ahí. Al fin y al cabo, es algo descriptivo, ¿no? --Discasto talk 21:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forum shopping?[edit]

Hi, what do you mean forum shopping? Where else did I start this same discussion? Jcb (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: I cannot find any other concept to describe the reopening of a DR with exactly the same arguments that were dismissed previously. Nothing has changed and you're simply trying to delete the very same template (and associated images) with exactly the same arguments that weren't enought to support a deletion. If you find a better concept, please, don't hesitate to share it with me. I'm not a native speaker (even in Wikimedia parlance). Best regards --Discasto talk 12:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Forum shopping is something completely else. Jcb (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About propper categorizing[edit]

Hello Discasto, I'll proceed to revert your changes. The reason is there is a specific category for those images, and they should not be included on the generic one of Real Madrid C.F. I may proceed to locate them again on their propper categorization among with others in same terms. Best regards. --Brgesto (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Brgesto: Feel free to create more specific categories if you wish (sort of "Real Madrid team celebrations"). Until then, don't remove the proper categorization. Thanks --Discasto talk 12:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, much better like this. Propperly categorized under new category "Celebrations of Real Madrid". Regards. --Brgesto (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Politicians[edit]

Hola Dicasto. Recurro a ti por lo siguiente. Se han marcado para borrado tres imágenes de políticos españoles: File:Beatriz Corredor.JPG, File:Antonia Trujillo.JPG y File:CesarAntonio Molina.JPG . Se trata de tres ex ministros que lo fueron bajo el Gobierno del Partido Socialista de José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. ¿De dónde salieron las imágenes? De la Web de la Moncoloa que permite su uso libre. ¿Por qué las quieren borrar? Porque ya no están en la web de La Moncloa y alegan que falta información sobre su procedencia. ¿Por qué ya no están en la web de La Moncloa? Porque cuando el Partido Popular ganó las elecciones borró de la web de La Moncloa todas las imágenes de los políticos del PSOE. Me resulta muy difícil explicar a un extranjero todas estas mezquindades de la política española. Pero al tiempo me parece aberrante que Wikimedia deba seguir los dicatdos políticos del residente de Moncloa de turno. Si en su día se publicó con licencia parra reproducción el hecho de que se haya retirado no debería ser motivo para que Wikimedia se mimetizara. Por esa regla de tres por cierto deberían ser también borradas File:Mariano Fernández Bermejo en rueda de prensa.jpg y File:Francisco Caamaño Domínguez.jpg y cuando el PSOE vuelva al Gobierno se borrarán de wikimnedia imágens como File:Vicepresidenta Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría 2012 - La Moncloa (Recortada).jpg o File:Cristóbal Montoro 2012 (cropped).jpg por el mero hecho de que el Gobierno de turno las borrará de su web. No sé si estarás de acuerdo conmigo pero creo que Wikimedia no debería estar tan condicionada por los vaivenes políticos y no sé muy bien como evitarlo. ¿Me pudes ayudar? Gracias --Cvbr (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cvbr: Claro que te puedo ayudar. Todo esto es fruto de la "rehabilitación" de la web de La Moncloa como fuente válida. Sí, ahora tenemos {{Attribution-La Moncloa}}. Como parte de la reordenación, hemos estado tratando de hacer las cosas bien y sí, hemos llegado al punto que señalas. Las imágenes están localizadas (son exactamente 26, en la categoría Category:Images from the Government of Spain with a broken source), y una discusión asociada (aquí), en la que te animo a participar, en cualquier idioma, y a que animes a quien creas conveniente a hacerlo. Espero haberte aclarado algo el tema. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 21:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias! --Cvbr (talk) 13:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jorge Fernández Díaz.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jorge Fernández Díaz.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jorge Fernández Díaz.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ℯxplicit 11:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autofoto[edit]

Hola, mira, he encontrado esta foto, file:Acto de apoyo al Pacto de Estado contra la Violencia de Género - 36246750946.jpg, pero algo no cuadra, pone que la autora es Cristina Cifuentes..., y sale ella misma! :) Se supone que es una cuenta "en su nombre" pero que ella no es la autora de las fotos, sería más correcto que el autor se indicara como desconocido o algo así, no? Saludos, --Elisardojm (talk) 01:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comentario[edit]

Hola. He mandado a borrar File:Josep Meliá conversa con el presidente de la Agencia EFE y la actriz Carmen Sevilla.jpg porque era un exact duplicate de File:Josep Meliá conversa con el presidente de la Agencia EFE y la actriz Carmen Sevilla.jpeg.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Template:GobiernoEspaña - Images with broken sources[edit]

Ya he avisado en el café, mañana empiezo a hacerlo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Solo me han dejado un DR para cerrar. He puesto un aviso en Category talk:Images from the Government of Spain with a broken source y ¿qué quiere decir lo de six missing? La única que falta es File:MontillaChaves.jpg en la lista. Lo del café a ver si lo puedo preparar entre el besugo y el turrón. Lo que me recuerda que...¡¡Felices fiestas!! Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Cookie: Resuelto. ¡¡¡Muchas felicidades a ti también!!! --Discasto talk 22:51, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crematorio del cementerio de La Almudena.jpg[edit]

Hi, Discasto, I noticed your revert and am somewhat puzzled. Isn't Madrid in Spain?

Happy Holidays, Discasto


Lotje (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lotje: Sure it is.... however, Category:Crematoria in Spain does not exist... --Discasto talk 21:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On your request for image permissions[edit]

Hello! You have requested the legal information of six images that I uploaded. In all of them the source is explicitely stated in their File pages. These images are scanned from different issues of Revista "Funció Publicació" published by the Catalan Government. Their CC-BY-2.5 license is mentioned on pages 3 or 4. Specifically, the images come from the following issues:

I think that they are 100% good. You can check the PDF files in these links and you can see that they are hosted in a Catalan Government URL. However, this is not the first time that someone flags these images (last time I think it was also you). Perhaps you can help me adding more info in their File pages or phrasing it differently so that there are no doubts that these images are correct and they do not get flagged again. --SMP (talk page) 18:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SMP: Hola, ya lo he arreglado todo. El problema fundamental era la posibilidad de verificar el permiso. Una vez que has proporcionado una fuente en la que verificarlo, es tan sencillo como incluir una plantilla de {{LicenseReview}} para que un usuario de confianza pueda validarlo. Como yo lo soy, pues eso, todo arreglado, ya no volverá a ocurrir. Un cordial saludo y felices fiestas --Discasto talk 21:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Discasto/Archive005&oldid=795337315"