User talk:Cirt/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Contributions
Contributions
Barnstars
Barnstars

Thanks for your vote on my RfCU[edit]

I would like to thank you for taking the time to review my request for checkuser rights. I hope one more CU will make a difference, at least for the other CUs' workload! Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aspic.jpg[edit]

Excuse me, can you remove that photo from Commons? I have done a mistake and mixed up my photos. Thank you - Jos. (talk) 13:49, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Cirt (talk) 15:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ashot Arzumanyan (talk · contribs)[edit]

I unblocked this user per en:User talk:Ashot Arzumanyan. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for the notice, Cirt (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peralta[edit]

Can't blame him for not taking the time (it seems) to read/have someone read the messages, perhaps because he's engaged in a food fight with Monseratte - crazy American politics ;) Hekerui (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, crazy indeed... Cirt (talk) 16:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Message to John Travolta and Scientology celebrities part 1 of 2.ogv[edit]

Hi Cirt, in case you hadn't seen it, 2 of your ogv-uploads have been tagged for speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Most certainly NOT speedy = as it is a video by a former very high ranking member of the organization, about the organization's key practices. It is within scope as it can be linked to from relevant articles on associated projects. -- Cirt (talk) 11:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

for the trust in my ideas - I asked your notice on my page. I have no idea what to do against such behaviour. Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:34, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help[edit]

Hi, I am truly sorry for spamming your talk page previously, It is a very urgent situation. And you are a very experienced administrator here and at the en.Wikipedia, and you are also a member of the OTRS members, so I guess you can be very helpful regarding the discussion that is going on the Wikiproject medicine talk page, the discussion is very critical and regarding a very important subject that we don't have a clear policy about, its Patient images. So I please you to join the discussion and tell us what do you think. By the way there are about 25000 medical images that are donated and waiting upload to the commons, an the only thing stopping that is this discussion, so please join us there, so maybe we can reach to a policy soon. Thank you and sorry again :-) MaenK.A.Talk 11:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is plenty of discussion over there and I read it and am satisfied with the ongoing process, and I will defer to those already commenting in that discussion. -- Cirt (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for giving attention to the subject :-) MaenK.A.Talk 14:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. -- Cirt (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interview_Aaron_Saxton_part_1_of_7.ogv[edit]

File:Interview_Aaron_Saxton_part_1_of_7.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Conduct of administrator Cirt (talk · contributions) in relation to deletion requests (2)[edit]

Please address the open questions at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Conduct of administrator Cirt (talk · contributions) in relation to deletion requests (2). -- User:Docu at 05:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. Essentially I agree with this comment [1]. -- Cirt (talk) 06:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:May_1950_Astounding_Science_Fiction.jpg[edit]

File:May_1950_Astounding_Science_Fiction.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rimessa ferroviaria di Pistoia[edit]

If the official name of the facility is "Rimessa Ferroviaria di Pistoia", shouldn't we keep it that way instead of translating to english? --Jollyroger (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might try asking Moliva (talk · contribs) about this [2]. -- Cirt (talk) 17:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miles Fisher in 2006.jpg[edit]

Before bothering the OTRS people, I would like to ask you: who is the author is this photo? Was it really the photographer who released this image? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The owner and copyright holder of the work is Miles Fisher, who released it under the license "PUBLIC DOMAIN", and this is confirmed per COM:OTRS. The author, Erwinfletcher, had initially released it as "PUBLIC DOMAIN" (self), on English Wikipedia. -- Cirt (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:OTRS, Miles Fisher is the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work. -- Cirt (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Puzzling. First Erwinfletcher says that he made this picture in South-Africa, and that he has the power to release rights. And then subject claims that he has the rights, and releases it. Via mail directly to OTRS? And Erwinfletcher also uploads images of the subject taken at Harvard. Is there a straightforward explanation? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The explanation is that Miles Fisher is the owner and copyright holder of the picture, and has been confirmed via COM:OTRS as releasing the picture with the license "PUBLIC DOMAIN". Nothing more is needed. Free-use status is confirmed. -- Cirt (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will ask the OTRS people to look into this. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The OTRS people already looked into this. And confirmed it. As "public domain". Your continued disruption on this issue is a waste of the community's time. Especially with regard to files already confirmed as free-use per COM:OTRS. -- Cirt (talk) 16:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the e-mails on OTRS. The permissions seems to be valid for me. Raymond 16:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DR problem[edit]

I've been critisized fort a "keep"-decision. Would you be so kind to have a look on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mbdortmund#Deletion_requests_Lorenz_Choi_Cruz_5.jpg, perhaps I was wrong.

Thx --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2006_10_31_Cylon_pumpkin_01.jpg[edit]

File:2006_10_31_Cylon_pumpkin_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-Nard the Bard 21:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for the notice. -- Cirt (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry about the mess[edit]

Hi Cirt!

As I’m sure you have noticed the dispute between Pieter and you have turned into one messy debate. Some even said that they are sorry to see that someone “drag Cirt through the mud, and make him run the gauntlet, is disgusting”. I would not be surprised if someone (and perhaps you?) thinks that I’m one of those people.

I hope you know that my intention is not to spank you in any way. If you look at my first comment I suggested that you checked your uploads and Pieter gave you some peace to do your work. If you and the other admins had said “Ok” I would have had no problem if Pieter was blocked for not respecting that deal.

Things did not go that way and some said that there was nothing wrong with your uploads and if there was it was only one file. If it was correct that it was only one bad file I would also have no problem if Pieter was blocked for nominating your images for deletion with no reason.

As you have noticed I also said that uploading a few bad files is not a problem – sadly I have done that myself. So I’m not trying to get you punished or mocked for these uploads.

I also tried to get a compromise recently where you checked your uploads and Pieter was told to leave you alone for a while. So I think that I did try to end this.

My interest is 1) that we find and fix bad files in a good way and if anyone finds a way of doing that that does not involve Pieter I would be happy to support that way and 2) that Pieter is not spanked more than he deserves. I think that a block for one month is too long but sadly the only defense left I can think of includes a debate regarding your uploads.

No matter what I hope you will be able to smile after all in this weekend. --MGA73 (talk) 12:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially I agree with this comment [3] by Bastique (talk · contribs). -- Cirt (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In that case I see no reason to spend more time on your talk page. --MGA73 (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shenzhen[edit]

Hello, I saw that you moved files from category:views of streets in Shenzhen to category:streetscapes in Shenzhen. Thanks for that, I wanted to do it with "cat-a-lot" but I don't manage to use it. However the files don't seem to appear in the right category. Is there any problem ?--Zolo (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok sorry for disturbing you, it seems to work right now, I don't know what has changed. (by the way if you know why I can't use cat a lot I'm still interested. When I select multiple file, it works with the first one but does nothing with the others) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zolo (talk • contribs) 09:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:2005 05 Sharon Tate, par Navette.jpg[edit]

File:2005 05 Sharon Tate, par Navette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Wknight94 talk 13:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three daleks blue in front.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Three daleks blue in front.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dalek on pier by Mattbuck 02.jpg[edit]

File:Dalek on pier by Mattbuck 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the picture[edit]

Hi,I'm from zh-wiki,I would like to upload a picture's new version,however,the new version is SVG picture ,and old version is JPG picture.While I was uploading it,an error occured.What should I do?--Rocking Man (talk) 15:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest uploading a new one, separately, as the new version, and keeping the old version to link back to. -- Cirt (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for your ans--Rocking Man (talk) 16:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are most welcome. -- Cirt (talk) 16:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mick McCarthy.jpg[edit]

Hi Cirt, FYI, the uploader of File:Mick McCarthy.jpg falsified "your" Flickr-review when uploading a NC-licensed Flickr image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is very odd, thank you for the notification. -- Cirt (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 Xeni Jardin by Dave Bullock eecue 2.jpg[edit]

File:2007 Xeni Jardin by Dave Bullock eecue 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Andrew c (talk) 20:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry by Erik Warmelink[edit]

Subsection was previously titled: "Slander"

Hi, Cirt, you showed your US (lack of) education around 30 times today. A muslim doesn't depict people (even the theofages have "You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth"). Erik Warmelink (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the index page, Muhammad. See also the en.wikipedia article, en:Depictions of Muhammad, specifically the subsection, Depiction by Muslims. Thanks. -- Cirt (talk) 17:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The index page and en.wikipedia aren't reliable sources. Erik Warmelink (talk) 08:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Check again. The en.wikipedia page does have reliable sources cited in it. -- Cirt (talk) 10:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It has sources, but those sources don't support your claims. For example, please show the source which confirms http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Muhammad_6.jpg&diff=39010721. Erik Warmelink (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well from that one we have the source description on the image page. -- Cirt (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could you quote, please? The description (Mohammed at Medina, from an Arab or central Asian (Mongolian, Moghul) medieval-era manuscript.) doesn't claim a muslim author and is unsourced, http://www.zombietime.com/ is just a black propaganda website, see for example http://www.zombietime.com/botero_abu_ghraib/ which is an attempt to play down the US warcrimes. Erik Warmelink (talk) 17:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I have asked Kelson (talk · contribs) to comment about this image. -- Cirt (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(unindent)OK, while we wait for Kelson, could you give your source that Ishâq al-Nishâpûrî was a muslim? Erik Warmelink (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it is alright to wait for Kelson (talk · contribs) to clarify. :) -- Cirt (talk) 20:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I can not help you: no idea if the artist was muslim or not. (If I correctly understand, this is the question). Regards Kelson (talk) 09:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heya! About: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Gillan & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Pond images.[edit]

Heya! About: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Gillan & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Pond images.

Please use this instead for each if you can: http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/8227/karengillan.jpg

I do not understand all the rules about images, but the current one is not that great for each link.LostMK (talk) 17:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That image you suggest is not free-use licensed. -- Cirt (talk) 17:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COM:ADMINISTRATOR#Kameraad_Pjotr[edit]

I agreed with your reasoning that this Rfa should not be completed. I brought up the topic of nepotism and gave this Rfa as an example at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#new incident. - Stillwaterising (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 20:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Draw_Muhammad_Day_video_by_AwesomeSauceUK.ogv[edit]

File:Draw_Muhammad_Day_video_by_AwesomeSauceUK.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 06:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) by Bruce.jpg[edit]

File:Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) by Bruce.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FYI. Regards. Adambro (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Outdent[edit]

Template:Outdent has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--The Evil IP address (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg[edit]

File:Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--95.59.87.76 01:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for the notice. -- Cirt (talk) 01:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright vio[edit]

Hello. I want to inform you about File:ISIANCAR PRODUCTION.PNG which has a source with "Copyright ®" remark. I will appreciate if you take interest. Thank you in advance. --yabancım 09:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Also, this is a poster of an event. It has no sufficient source information and probably is under copyright. Can you please check it? --yabancım 21:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 22:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Me again :) Picture of a living person with no source information. Also the picture doesn't seem like to have a free licence. Thanks for your efforts. --yabancım 16:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, tagged, as lacking source info. -- Cirt (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008_02_Zoidberg_costumes.jpg[edit]

File:2008_02_Zoidberg_costumes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007_11_Zoidberg_costume.jpg[edit]

File:2007_11_Zoidberg_costume.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammed_by_Hlkolaya.jpg[edit]

File:Mohammed_by_Hlkolaya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

95.59.86.157 17:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg[edit]

File:Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--95.59.86.157 18:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright vio[edit]

Hi Cirt. This file belongs to a living person and its source is a copyrighted web site. I will appreciate if you take interest. Thanks in advance. --yabancım 13:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 05:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Church of Scientology IP addresses blocked.png[edit]

File:Church of Scientology IP addresses blocked.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Jeremyb (talk) 19:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prot[edit]

Hey Cirt. Sorry about here, I'm not sure how that happened. Thanks, ZooFari 22:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 02:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User name and copyright vio[edit]

Hi. This user's name means "Governorship of Eskişehir". I couldn't find the related policy here but it seems inappropriate. Also the files uploaded by this user doesn't seem to have a proper source and therefore violate the copyright rules. I will appreciate it if you take interest. Thank you in advance. --yabancım 09:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 10:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

I have learned something new today, that all CC lisenses are not all free content to the standard of the commons. It's an enlightening experience. ResidentAnthropologist (talk) 20:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Show image[edit]

Why? The cropped version gives more space to the two figures, which means that in the thumbnail version, they become more easily visible in the two Wikipedia articles in which the photo is used. Nightscream (talk) 19:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You say it is a customary practice, but is there an explicit guideline to this effect? I personally don't see why there would be an option to upload an edited version over the original on each original's page? I've uploaded a few touched-up versions here and there when the original was just plain awful, as with the image of Grace Park in her article's Infobox. I can't imagine why anyone would need to keep the original. I've also uploaded loads of edited versions of images I myself took. Is this okay, or does the same point apply? Nightscream (talk) 03:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you answer my questions?
As for the tool, you don't have to repeat the bit about the tool, as you already mentioned it in your previous message, and I was aware of it prior to then as well. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 08:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I have responded by questioning the legitimacy of your assertions, and provided my rationale for doing so, which included legitimate questions that call them into question. For your part and Tabercil's, you have responded with A. repeated evasion of my quite-reasonable questions, in your case, B. employing a repetition of your original message that I perceived as possibly condescending--moreso in light of your most recent message, in which you have not only persisted in this, but with a tone that was even less polite than before.

Because you have not answered any of my polite questions in this matter, and have refused to point to any policy or guideline page supporting your viewpoint (even complicating this assertion by referring to the procedure you insist upon as a "personal preference"), and acted as if your statements are dogmatic, I am less inclined to take them at face value now than when you first contacted me. I will continue to investigate the matter of uploading alternate versions of images with other experienced contributors here, and conduct my future activities here accordingly. I will also report your behavior to the appropriate administrative areas as well. Nightscream (talk) 00:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright vio[edit]

Hi Cirt. This file, which was uploaded here on 2 November 2009, was taken from a newspaper's web site. The page is here with the date "05.04.2009". So it is obvious that the file is under copyright and should be deleted. Thank you in advance. --yabancım 12:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Madurai covered all[edit]

Hi Cirt,

Sad to see taht madurai montage image got deleted. What kind of copyright violation was found in that image? why was it deleted? Wasifwasif (talk) 12:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? -- Cirt (talk) 04:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Madurai_covered_all.JPG is the image which got deleted saying copyright violation. It contained picture of 9 places. Which part of it was found to violate copyrights. Please help so that i can upload again with proper license Wasifwasif (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg[edit]

File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Azizfaisalaziz (talk) 10:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 03 15 Anonymous v Co$.jpg[edit]

File:2008 03 15 Anonymous v Co$.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Karppinen (talk) 17:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ISSO Atlanta[edit]

With reference to [6], note Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Atlanta and BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Atlanta are 2 different temples. AroundTheGlobe (talk) 10:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm, you should try to engage in discussion with user 208.81.184.4 (talk · contribs). -- Cirt (talk) 14:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Speaking_Out_About_Organized_Scientology.pdf[edit]

File:Speaking_Out_About_Organized_Scientology.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rob (talk) 16:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Caricatures of politicians of the United States[edit]

  1. Cleaned up this category.
  2. Created a bunch of sub-categories.
  3. Checked and made sure each sub-category was subsequently alphabetized, by last name.
  4. Posted to category creator, Foroa (talk · contribs), for possible coordination in the future.

-- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political cartoons of the United States[edit]

  1. This category currently has over 180 pages in it.
  2. Could be improved by sub-categorization.
  3. Perhaps sorting through classification by century, for example, Category:1700s political cartoons of the United States, etc.
  4. Posted to category creator, Wst (talk · contribs), and waiting a bit for feedback.
  5. Probably will go ahead and begin process of sub-categorization of this category, by chronological order method.

-- Cirt (talk) 01:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Let me redraw your attention to Commons naming conventions; "1900s" refers to the decade; the century is "20th century" (or as some pedants insist, "20th-century" when in adjective form). Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've cleaned up & recategorized the images for the "1700s" "1800s" and "2000s" (apparently miscategorized by century rather than decade). I've just redirected Category:1900s political cartoons of the United States to Category:20th-century political cartoons of the United States until at least most of the images in the cat are somewhere more specific. Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:27, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I have the Category:1900s political cartoons of the United States cleaned up now, I think. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you very very much for all of your help!!! -- Cirt (talk) 22:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Commons_user_rights_request_pages[edit]

Category discussion warning

Commons user rights request pages has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Leyo 14:42, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update = withdrawn by the nominator. -- Cirt (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:"Anonymous"_anti-Scientology_protests_in_Canada[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:"Anonymous"_anti-Scientology_protests_in_Canada has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

176.61.42.211 15:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rick_Santorum_-_frothy_Caricature.jpg[edit]

File:Rick_Santorum_-_frothy_Caricature.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:One_half_of_santorum_ingredients_fecal_matter.jpg[edit]

File:One_half_of_santorum_ingredients_fecal_matter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cirt/Archive_2&oldid=66484707"