User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archives

Archive
Archive



L'inconnu de Villy-en-Auxois[edit]

J'ai utilisé votre image de l'inconnu de Villy-en-Auxois (nécropole de Doua) dans la page de Villy-en-Auxois. Merci (L'inconnu de Villy-en-Auxois à la à la nécropole nationale de la Doua.JPG) --Michelfouch (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci à vous, c'est fait pour .
Bonne continuation, --Benoît Prieur (d) 17:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau attention à Bressolles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brey de Vent - mars 2016 - 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:02, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bp selfie.jpg[edit]

File:Bp selfie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Riley Huntley (talk) 23:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laurence Pierre, France Inter (8513627240).jpg[edit]

File:Laurence Pierre, France Inter (8513627240).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

88.142.204.129 12:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Jean Martin ; La Cornue ; François Jacquier[edit]

Bonjour Monsieur, Je vous remercie de votre message concernant les photos des oeuvres suivantes : Jean Martin, "La Blessure au côté" ; Marcel Roux, "La Cornue" et Laurent Pêcheux, "Portrait du père François Jacquier". Il se trouve que ces trois oeuvres m'appartiennent et ne sont soumis à aucun droit particulier. Par ailleurs, pour les deux derniers artistes, Marcel Roux est mort en 1922 et Laurent Pécheux en 1821. Les oeuvres sont donc dans le domaine public. Concernant Jean Martin, si l'artiste est décédé en 1996, ses deux filles sont religieuses et ont refuser les droits. L'artiste est aujourd'hui défendu par l'association Mémoire du peintre Jean Martin, dont je fais parti. Il est dommage que la photo de "La Blessure au côté" est été supprimée car se tient actuellement une exposition sur l'artiste à La Piscine de Roubaix. Nous aurions pu discuter de cela de vive voix aujourd'hui au musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon où je travaille. Comment peut-on remettre en ligne ces trois photos ? Je vous remercie par avance de votre aide à ce sujet. Très cordialement, — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.23.231.20 (talk) 09:29, 05 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Monsieur, si vous avez les droits sur les œuvres de Jean Martin, pouvez-nous envoyer ce modèle (cliquer ici pour voir le modèle) rempli et signé à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org ? Merci. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suze (Drôme)[edit]

Salut !

En fait, c'est très simple d'ajouter les photos que j'ai prises avec mon téléphone :) j'ai découvert du coup que tu as renommé Category:Suze (Drôme) en Category:Suze-sur-Crest et il me semble que c'est une erreur. Ce village a eu ce nom d'usage quelques années, mais sans décision officielle et le nom a été raccourci récemment volontairement, par le conseil municipal. Qu'en dis-tu ? Noé (talk) 00:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,
@Noé: En fait je n'ai pas renommé : les deux coexistaient => Suze (Drôme) (2013) et Suze-sur-Crest (2010). Il n'y a eu aucun renommage donc a forciori aucun que j'aurais effectué. Il me semble que tu t'aies mépris lors de ta découverte. Quand j'ai uploadé quelques photos j'ai redirigé le plus récent vers le plus ancien (au moins pour éviter d'avoir 2 "Crest" dans "communes de la Drôme" ici).
C'est très simple à changer en fait (d'autant qu'il y a peu de photos). Pour savoir si c'est le nom du COG, wpfr a (presque) toujours raison.
A+ . --Benoît Prieur (d) 01:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Benoît Prieur (d) 01:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci ! Je m'étais mal exprimé, tu avais mis une redirection et non pas renommé. Je n'étais pas sûr de la démarche à faire pour inverser le sens de la redirection, et c'est pour ça que je me suis permis de te déranger avec ça. Je vais regarder comment tu as fais pour apprendre pour la prochaine fois. Au passage, plus que 200 photos à envoyer sur le serveur de Mappilary, c'est allé plutôt rapidement ! Noé (talk) 09:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No pbmo . Cool pour Mapillary (je soupçonne que tu sois au moins un peu "fibré"). --Benoît Prieur (d) 09:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Culoz[edit]

Panneau jumelage Béon (Ain).

Bonjour,
Je vois que tu étais à Culoz dimanche 17 pour l'arrivée du tour de France... et que tu y a pris de belles photos (j'ai l'impression que tu aimes l'Ain & le cyclisme). J'y étais la veille, samedi 16, pour le mariage d'un de mes neveux émigré dans l'Ain... et j'y ai pris des photos que je transfère sur Commons . --François GOGLINS (talk) 08:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

@François GOGLINS: Bonjour François ,
Oui j'adore l'Ain et le vélo (là j'étais servi) ! :) Je tâcherai de participer à la catégorisation de tes photos de l'Ain (de mon côté j'en ai encore beaucoup à uploader). J'en profite pour te dire combien je trouve que ton travail photographique est d'une qualité remarquable (je suis régulièrement ce que tu fais et pas seulement dans l'Ain, mais dans l'Yonne aussi et ailleurs). En guise de clin d’œil, cette photo prise dimanche à 3 km de Culoz (à Béon).
À bientôt ici ou sur le Wiktionnaire,
--Benoît Prieur (d) 08:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sais-tu que j'avais remarqué de village et j'y aurais bien fait quelques photos, mais je véhiculais ma fille cadette qui ne comprends guère pourquoi je prends des photos pour en offrir l'usage à qui en veut... et donc râlait à chaque étape. C'est dommage car j'ai traversé des villages pittoresques. --François GOGLINS (talk) 08:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Ah ben tiens ...[edit]

Apparemment on n'était pas loin l'un de l'autre ce dimanche à Bourg, ça aurait été marrant de se croiser devant le monastère :). El pitareio (talk) 11:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@El pitareio: oui j'ai vu cela. Mais il y avait tellement de monde...on aurait pu aller écouter Hervé Vilard ensemble . Au passage bravo pour l'atteinte d'un certain niveau 16 (waouh).
--Benoît Prieur (d) 11:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gallura - Sardinia - 2016 (29).JPG[edit]

File:Gallura - Sardinia - 2016 (29).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Benoît Prieur (d) 20:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joyeux anniversaire...[edit]

...mon pote. En retard, je sais, mais c'est l'intention qui compte.--Classiccardinal (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Classiccardinal: Merci c'est gentil.
Je suis très pris là mais je viens vite te voir. D'ici là retourne donc sur le Wiktionnaire, tout le monde t'aime là-bas.
Tchao, --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Églises[edit]

Bonjour !

C'est arrivé comme souvent, de fil en anguille. Il y a une poignée de départements, comme l'Ain notamment, dont l'arborescence est mieux organisée que les autres mais si je ne me décourage pas entretemps, je crois que je suis parti pour quelques milliers d'edits ;-) Litlok (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ça c'est sûr. C'est un travail titanesque mais tellement utile.
Encore bravo. Et merci.
--Benoît Prieur (d) 07:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FoP en France[edit]

Bonjour, Pour ce qui concerne File:Archives départementales du Rhône Juin 2014.JPG et File:Archives départementales du Rhône Mai 2016.jpg, de cette façon, vous ne pouvez pas photographier n'importe quel bâtiment en France?--2A01:E35:39C1:D100:709F:5432:A7FE:2B72 15:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Vous pouvez le photographier mais en aucun cas diffuser la photo et encore moins la publier sous licence libre : en effet, cela constitue une enfreinte au droit d'auteur de l'architecte.
Désolé. --Benoît Prieur (d) 16:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (t) Josve05a (c) 15:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière de la Croix-Rousse ancien - november 2016 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK now. --A.Savin 03:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-11-27 nouveau cimetière de la XRousse (56).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Le qualite' suffit pour moi. -- Ikan Kekek 09:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-11-27 nouveau cimetière de la XRousse (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 23:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-11-27 Old cemetery of Croix-Rousse (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good but could you brighten the face. It looks too dark. --Nikhilb239 00:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC) @Nikhilb239: I tried to brigthen the image. Thank you. --Benoît Prieur 08:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Looks good to me. --Nikhilb239 02:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière du Mas Rillier - décembre 2016 (16).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château Chiloup - Dagneux - décembre 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lídia Jorge 2014 Faro - 2.JPG[edit]

File:Lídia Jorge 2014 Faro - 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

86.216.189.176 18:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bourg-en-Bresse - décembre 2016 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Benoît_Prieur/Archives_2016&oldid=844467528"