User talk:Allforrous/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
 |
File:L_Simons_1982.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 04:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
|
File:Leonardo_Simons.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 04:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:1724blandengue01.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1724blandengue01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 04:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry. Speedydelete, please. Allforrous (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Category:Cafe mocha
Hallo Allforrous, you have created Category:Cafe mocha. Have you ever read Commons:categories? What should this category be? I guess it should be about the type of coffee. you do not need to put all mokka expresses in it. I have simply put the relevant category in it. Just respond here please. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry. Speedydelete, please. --Allforrous (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- ¡Hola! Allforrous, no need to say sorry. Maybe you had an good idea but you made it a bit wrong. :-)
- According to your edit here you mean this type of coffee which did not had a category yet. I have put in interwiki links to the category Category:Cafe mocha now. However, the Moka Expresses are not related to Cafe mocha I would say. They make no Cafe mocha. They produce a espresso-like coffee. What do you think? Please just answer here - I watch your talk page. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Saibo, i agree with your change, thank you for correcting me. Happy Christmas. From Argentina --Allforrous (talk) 11:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Allforrous, okay, have changed some files. Feliz Navidad! --Saibo (Δ) 14:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Garlopa mecánica.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 14:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Why did you remove ?
Hello why did you remove Flora of Nepal Category from this image? -Krish Dulal (talk) 06:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your suggestions. I was unaware of that fact. -Krish Dulal (talk) 08:54, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Allforrous. Why did you create the category? All the files in it had been fixed before you created it. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Ferro Carril
Stop it. Am splitting the categories between the several disciplines of the club. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Valparaiso
I have noticed that Alexxos has uploading images of the 1906 earthquake in Valporiso as his own photos - when they really should be - PD images - he has no rights as they are copies anyways - what do you think? My spanish is not good if at all, and I dont want to offend the hard work, but think they are the wrong licensing, I am hoping and trusting your understanding of my query... thanks if you are able to help. sats (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- gracias
- thank for your reply, I can understand - it can be a problem sats (talk) 09:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Redirection of Belarus
You made redirection of the page Belarus from Беларусь to Category:Belarus. What was the sense to ignore the presentation page? - Frantishak (talk) 23:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Camiseta de Arsenal de Sarandí.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Camiseta de Arsenal de Sarandí.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Camiseta de Arsenal de Sarandí.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Motopark (talk) 13:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission
Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 13:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:OscarAntonioPianetti.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:OscarAntonioPianetti.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:OscarAntonioPianetti.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Motopark (talk) 13:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Rollback
I've made you a rollbacker after seeing numerous vandalism reverts from you. This should make reverting vandalism a bit quicker and easier for you. INeverCry 19:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Main Page Urdu
Hi,
Could you explain why you speedy nominated the Main Page in Urdu??? صفحۂ اول Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Not Photo
It is not photo, it is paintings :). Just cool paintings :)--Хомелка (talk) 06:44, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
I am wondering what the point is of a gallery with only two photos in it? Unless the page adds something useful to the actual category listings, it is better off not existing at all, and two photos, with no commentary adds nothing at all, beyond a page that will confuse visitors. Cheers, NiD.29 (talk) 05:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Ljubljana2 092.JPG
Hi, why did you remove File:Ljubljana2 092.JPG from the category 'Pedestrian tunnels in Slovenia'? --Eleassar (t/p) 05:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Saludos Allforrous, en Venezuela hace tiempo que las personas no hacen esas cosas. Como podrás ver en la categoría abajo al final de la imagen es en Budapest, Hungría. Igualmente un fuerte abrazo desde la República Federativa de Brasil. Por favor, no dejes de escribirme por cualquier cosa insignificante que necesites --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
You nominated the category twice for speedy deletion. I think, that it is useful to keep as redirect, because en:Syncrolift is a word, which is likely to be used by others. You can consult with HelenOnline, who created the category redirect. Taivo (talk) 21:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Category:FOTO has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
JuTa 19:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a schematic French but on global climate change. Category:Climate change in France, is the bad category.--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Could you please explain...
Category:Taken with Samsung GT-S7560M has been restored. We don't usually speedy delete {{Category redirect}}s do we? Is there some special circumstance where you thought this made sense here? Geo Swan (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Category:Environmental_Projects_in_Denmark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Alan Liefting (talk) 03:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Japanese saws has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Andy Dingley (talk) 13:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Reverted Your Edit at Category:Caracol logos
I reverted you category change at Category:Caracol logos. Please review Wikimedia Commons policy on categories before changing any more in this way. The page was already in a subcategory of Category:Logos of television channels and networks as it was in Television logos of Columbia. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Red link categories
I notice you rollbacked my edit, which by the way, should be used for edits made by vandals. I'm not a vandal. I undid your edit since you had added a red link category (Category:Bilingual street signs in the United States wasn't created until later). You should create a category before adding it to files. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 13:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Allforrous. Please avoid to make edits of things you don't understand absolutelly. Your effort to create the missing category Category:Daleké Popelice was praiseworthy but your guess that Daleké Popelice is a name of a German man from a diaspora is quite nonsensical. --ŠJů (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
James Gill
Hello, many thanks for addding the GK-painting to Wikimedia! Could you please help me to link the Wikimedia data to the English, French and German Wikipedia article about James Gill? Kind regards, (User talk:Norbert Schott), 19:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Words in category titles generally aren't capitalized (except proper names) as "art" in Category:Baltic-German Art. 2001:7D0:88C2:F401:45EF:4E2D:195F:9DC 14:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC).
Category:ଧ୍ୱନି ଘ
Hey Allforrous,
I have removed your edit in Category:ଧ୍ୱନି ଘ. It is actually odia (oriya) pronunciation not Urdu. Let me know your views.--ଶିତିକଣ୍ଠ ଦାଶ (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
It's an error
Hello! Sorry, but "Radio y Televisión Argentina" is a state company that manages one TV channel (Canal 7 Buenos Aires) and radio system (LRA Radio Nacional). It is right that the category:Radio y Televisión Argentina is included in categories "radio of Argentina" and "television of Argentina" and not vice versa. Regards. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Requesting Category Renames
Hello, please consider using cat-a-lot to empty out categories first before requesting that they be deleted/renamed. That would really go a long way to help make our job easier. Cheers, FASTILY 07:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
User-Category
Hello! Sorry for reverting your edit again. IMO a user category like my category Category:Photographs by Dietmar Rabich/Spanien is not useful in Category:Photographs of Spain. Category:Images of Spain by user is a better place. --XRay talk 13:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Why did you add that to many subcat of Category:People by posture ? It's contrary to Commons:Categories#Over-categorization. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Woollahra, New South Wales
Regarding "vandalising" the above page, I blanked it because it was one of my silly little galleries that I created a long time ago and no longer had any interest in. No-one else contributed to it or took any interest in it. I thought I was entitled to delete it. I made sure all the pix were in the appropriate category first. Good-bye.
Sardaka (talk) 07:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, in case this page gets deleted before you can see why I've requested its speedy deletion (and the admin doesn't use the reason as the log entry), it is:
SD|G1|2=category is empty (server lag), see files, Special:Search and Special:Diff/151570302|category=
FDMS 4 16:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
base=use sub-categories ––Apalsola t • c 17:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Allforrous,
- I reverted your modifications of Category:Arcellinida and Category:Tubulinea to integrate them in Tubulinea which is an include template.
The whole idea of Taxonavigation include templates is that if you change one template, all the taxon categories and articles using it are changed.
Don't hesitate to ask me for further changes in include templates.
But please, keep using them. - About Taxonavigation: they are not supposed to display red links like Supergroup: Unikonta and Subphylum Lobosa in Category:Arcellinida.
Are you planning to create them ?
Do you want help to create them ?
Because, if we don't create them, we should not reference them in Taxonavigation.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 13:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
For the record
Please take note of this recent undeletion request: [1]. It seems that you emptied the categories and asked them to be deleted. Please don't destroy other people's work as long as it's still useful. Regards, --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Led has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Achim (talk) 18:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Curcurbitella (was: Category:Cucurbitella_mespiliformis
The genus name Cucurbitella exists twice: once as plant in the Cucurbitaceae and once in the amoebas (family: Difflugiidae). As scientific plant names and animal names may be identical, this creates some confusion, of course, so it might be useful to add the correct family category as additional category to the correponding species category. What do you think, or what are the rules in WMcommons? --Pharaoh han (talk) 07:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)