User talk:Agent001/Архив
- The following discussion is closed, and will be archived soon.
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Contents
- 1 Tip: Categorizing images
- 2 File:Stamp 1946 1029.jpg
- 3 File:Stalin kp06031953.jpg
- 4 Please read message on the images
- 5 Photographs of coins
- 6 Better source request for Image:Sangiyin Bayar.jpg
- 7 Soviet Union stamps
- 8 File source is not properly indicated: File:Newfoto1.jpg
- 9 Email abuse
- 10 File:Newfoto1.jpg
- 11 File:Libra constellation map.png
- 12 File talk:Ruger-lcp-1.jpg
- 13 С праздником Победы над нацистской Германией!
- 14 File:Dmitriy Trenin.jpg
- 15 File:Shark84.JPG
- 16 File:Shark83.JPG
- 17 Glossop north end
- 18 File:Wikinews-logo-endirect.png
- 19 AGENT007
- 20 File:927th Tactical Airlift Group - Emblem.png
- 21 Правило
- 22 A cup of coffee for you!
- 23 File:Solvay conference 1927.jpg
- 24 Выставления на удаление
- 25 warning
- 26 You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days (3 дня)
- 27 Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Agent001
- 28 You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week
- 29 File:Convert ru014.jpg
- 30 File:Shark86.JPG
- 31 File:Shark84.JPG
- 32 File:Shark83.JPG
- 33 Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
- 34 Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
- 35 File:Pozner new.jpg
- 36 File source is not properly indicated: File:Order of the Gold Star копия.jpg
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ +/−
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.- Image:Snooker table2.png is uncategorized since 12 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Newfoto1.jpg is uncategorized since 8 April 2009.
- Image:First image of Earth.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Logo-kremlin.png was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Vladimir Govorov.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Владимир Зеленский.jpg was uncategorized on 12 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Alex Reimer.jpeg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:000g0x9p.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Исправлено.--Agent001 (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stalin kp06031953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Please read message on the images[edit]
See Template:PD-Soviet! --MGA73 (talk) 21:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Photographs of coins[edit]
Hi Agent, also the photographer gains copyright for a photo of a 3D object - see Commons:Image casebook#Coins - you can not upload this images only under PD for the coin, also the photographer must agree. --Martin H. (talk) 21:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did not understand. It is images of soviet coins, they PD.--Agent001 (talk) 21:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Better source request for Image:Sangiyin Bayar.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sangiyin Bayar.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Что надо? С этим файлом все в порядке.--Agent001 (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Soviet Union stamps[edit]
I have about a dozen images of Soviet Union stamps with space themes on them, but I am having difficulty finding the correct way to upload them. Cannot find the correct option at Wikimedia commons. Gwillhickers (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- do not understand. please symply english.--Agent001 (talk) 11:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File source is not properly indicated: File:Newfoto1.jpg[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/− |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Newfoto1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Newfoto1.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
- What do you want?--Agent001 (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Agent001,
following consultation with a russian-speaking admin, I've converted your speedy into a regular DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anna Politkovskaya byZelenskaya.jpg. It would be good to provide your deletion-rationalte also in english, if possible. --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ок, speedy delete - its was my mystake. Whrite atribution - symply delete.--Agent001 (talk) 01:04, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Email abuse[edit]
It has come to my attention that you replied to an email that a commons user sent you with foul language, and in an uncivil manner (I have the email, and have verified you sent it). I want to make it very clear that this is a place where others show each other respect, regardless of if you are communicating on-wiki or via wiki-email. Consider this your only warning, further incivility will result in a block. Additionally, you do not happen to also own the account Aist35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) do you? Tiptoety talk 19:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not understand. You must talk with russian administrator, for example User:Butko.--Agent001 (talk) 11:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tiptoety пишет, что Вы в письме к другому участнику использовали браную лексику и повёли себя не самым лучшим образом. Это не допустимо. На этот раз он предупреждает, а при повторении - заблокирует --Butko (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Спасибо за помощь. Эээ.. вообще-то не помню такого, наверное бухой был. Речь идет про то, что я послал письмо по вики-почте, или ругался на СО? Не обнаружил в своей истории правок такого. Зная себя, я просто так не ругаюсь, видно кто-то сильно меня разозлил. Я прошу вас попросить User:Tiptoety чтобы он показал мне что же я там написал и кому. А также чтобы он использовал односложные предложения и простой английский обращаясь ко мне, чтобы онлайн переводчик смог перевести. --Agent001 (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tiptoety пишет, что Вы в письме к другому участнику использовали браную лексику и повёли себя не самым лучшим образом. Это не допустимо. На этот раз он предупреждает, а при повторении - заблокирует --Butko (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Newfoto1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Why have you added the no-licence-box to that image ? The image is licenced correctly as GFDL and "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" since a long time. As a result, the image has been deleted, delinked by the Delinker and now restoring and manually repaitring is nescessary. Don't make such bad jokes again! Antonsusi (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Where free license? I only see copyright on http://pp3.sourceforge.net/ "Copyright © 2003 Torsten Bronger"--Agent001 (talk) 01:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- License of the software and license of screenshots are two different things. If you want more details, please contact the uploader. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 07:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You do not understand about you talk.--Agent001 (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ? Anyway, please wait before asking the speedy deletion because we have to check! Furthermore, this is not the only map... please wait! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 20:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You do not understand about you talk.--Agent001 (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Full copyright is only the software, the images have a free licence. That's the same like the following example:
- When you buy MS Word and you write a letter to your friend with it, then YOU have the copyright about your letter and Microsoft still has the copyright of MS Word.
- Therefore, the images are free. Antonsusi (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- License of the software and license of screenshots are two different things. If you want more details, please contact the uploader. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 07:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have declined your speedy deletion request of this file again. For my reasons please see the file talk page. De728631 (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
С праздником Победы над нацистской Германией![edit]
Поздравляю с государственным праздником - Днём Победы!--Vizu (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Dmitriy Trenin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
File:Shark84.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
File:Shark83.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Glossop north end[edit]
i (GNEbandit) am not sure exactly how GNE have effected you, but all the images i supply for the Wiki page of GNE are all provided from free sources and have NO copyright violations. please discuss with myself before you flag up any image for speedy deletion again or i will pass these incidents on to the administrators.
I have just started a undeletion request for this file. -- Common Good (talk) 17:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AGENT007[edit]
- What is your problem man,why do you report my pictures ?!?!?
- Oh,i forgot, YOU ARE RETARDED !
File:927th Tactical Airlift Group - Emblem.png[edit]
It's an Air Force Patch. It's in the public domain. What other information do you need? Bwmoll3 (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Правило[edit]
Вы пишете: «фото с копирайтом недопустимы здесь». Скажите пожалуйста, в каком правиле это записано? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Скажем так, не "недопустимы", а "настоятельно не рекомендуется" (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Manipulating_meta_data#Purpose_for_using_EXIF_at_Commons). Касательно тех фоток, что я спрашивал у Бутко, то я вообще-то постаил под сомнение автоство загружающего, это может быть копиво.--Agent001 (talk) 19:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Спасибо за ссылку. Это не правило, это своего рода howto. На эту страничку по ссылке можно вообще не обращать внимания. Она не имеет никакой обязательности.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- В шаблоне {{Watermark}} написано что это политика фонада, а не howto. А политика фонада - это серьезно. --Agent001 (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- В шаблоне сказано про «не поощряется», а вот про допустимость вы перегнули палку. В самой же странице, куда идёт ссылка, я не нашёл ни одного слова про «политику фонда». Видимо, авторы шаблона писали эти фантазии прямо из своей головы.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Да, уже я обратил на это нимание. Скажу об этом Бутко. --193.227.206.87 14:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- В шаблоне сказано про «не поощряется», а вот про допустимость вы перегнули палку. В самой же странице, куда идёт ссылка, я не нашёл ни одного слова про «политику фонда». Видимо, авторы шаблона писали эти фантазии прямо из своей головы.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- В шаблоне {{Watermark}} написано что это политика фонада, а не howto. А политика фонада - это серьезно. --Agent001 (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Спасибо за ссылку. Это не правило, это своего рода howto. На эту страничку по ссылке можно вообще не обращать внимания. Она не имеет никакой обязательности.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A cup of coffee for you![edit]
Did you colorize File:Solvay conference 1927.jpg? It's awesome! Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
Not. I keep this image from http://www.factroom.ru/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/26.jpg. --Agent001 (talk) 12:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Solvay conference 1927.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
Also, the colourized version, if legal, should be on its own separated page, as it is not the original document or a faithfull reproduction of it... Zeugma fr (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm, did not understand you. Will ask the Russian sysop. --Agent001 (talk) 11:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are 2 points :
- you are not the author of the colourized image. so it need an authorization (commons:OTRS) to be published.
- it's better to have 2 files : one is the original, and one is the coloured version. after, users can choose which they want to use.
- regards, Zeugma fr (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are 2 points :
Выставления на удаление[edit]
Уважаемый, для чего всё вот это? Это файлы со встречи участников русской Википедии в Москве! --Maxtirdatov (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- И что?--Agent001 (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
warning[edit]
Agent001, please, don't teach users how to avoid general licensing principles - this is not a good practice and you were explained why your comments are not correct - see section 'Нужна помощь!' (link). Improper user's attitude to licensing that could be caused by your advices may result in restrictions to his account and the ultimate reason of it would be you, who gave him wrong and unfair advice on the local village pump.
So, please, try to avoid such comments and stay in line with the rules or your possiblity to edit could be restricted. rubin16 (talk) 16:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Рубин, ты дурак что-ли? Нафиг мне тут твой инглиш.--Agent001 (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Вы лучше по сути дела скажите. Вот у меня есть фотоснимки, сделанные человеком, которому я прихожусь наследником. Они трёх видов: фотопластинки, фотоплёнки, отпечатки. Снимки не подписаны, то есть авторство не зафиксировано документальным путём. Как именно я могу доказать, что я правообладатель?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Вы ничего не должны доказывать. Доказывать должен тот, кто ставит это под сомнение.--Agent001 (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- После вашей реплики в адрес Rubin16 у меня просто-таки руки чешутся послать вас в викиреальность как минимум на неделю, а лучше - и на все две (тем более я ещё и обнаружил, что вы в русской ВП уже бессрочно забанены). На первый раз последую совету незабвенного Степаныча, но если еще раз увижу, как вы здесь троллите или оскорбляете других участников, то можете быть уверены, что ваша здешняя учётная запись довольно быстро последует википедийной. Мерси - A.Savin 10:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Дорогой мой, ты мне здесь флажками не размахивай, иначе я пошлю, только не в Викиреальность, а подальше.--Agent001 (talk) 10:47, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Потрудитесь не фамильярничать, здесь Викисклад, а не Икея. Вашу скорее на детский сад смахивающую угрозу пропущу мимо ушей и рад, что вы моё предупреждение приняли к сведению. Всего наилучшего, - A.Savin 10:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Да ты, дружок, все не уймешься? Ультиматумы своей жене ставь. Изучи этот топик сначала, и убедись, кто на самом деле угрожал.--Agent001 (talk) 11:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Предупреждение в нарушении правил не является угрозой или личным выпадом. Встречные личные выпады - являются оскорблением и нарушением правил. rubin16 (talk) 14:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- у меня просто-таки руки чешутся послать вас в викиреальность как минимум на неделю - это не угрозы? Да вы тут вообще распоясались.--Agent001 (talk) 09:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Предупреждение в нарушении правил не является угрозой или личным выпадом. Встречные личные выпады - являются оскорблением и нарушением правил. rubin16 (talk) 14:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Да ты, дружок, все не уймешься? Ультиматумы своей жене ставь. Изучи этот топик сначала, и убедись, кто на самом деле угрожал.--Agent001 (talk) 11:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Потрудитесь не фамильярничать, здесь Викисклад, а не Икея. Вашу скорее на детский сад смахивающую угрозу пропущу мимо ушей и рад, что вы моё предупреждение приняли к сведению. Всего наилучшего, - A.Savin 10:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Дорогой мой, ты мне здесь флажками не размахивай, иначе я пошлю, только не в Викиреальность, а подальше.--Agent001 (talk) 10:47, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- После вашей реплики в адрес Rubin16 у меня просто-таки руки чешутся послать вас в викиреальность как минимум на неделю, а лучше - и на все две (тем более я ещё и обнаружил, что вы в русской ВП уже бессрочно забанены). На первый раз последую совету незабвенного Степаныча, но если еще раз увижу, как вы здесь троллите или оскорбляете других участников, то можете быть уверены, что ваша здешняя учётная запись довольно быстро последует википедийной. Мерси - A.Savin 10:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Справка по сути дела[edit]
- Info На моей странице обсуждения мы с администратором User:rubin16 обсудили, как доказать авторские права без документов. Участник rubin16 не привёл способы доказательства, а вместо этого предложил обсуждать вопрос с участниками OTRS. Уточнение вносит участник Ymblanter. Доказывать авторство и права не важно; гораздо важнее принять на себя ответственность, поэтому письмо в OTRS позволит снять ответственность с ВикиСклада.
- Info Итак, нужно сделать то, что предлагает Agent001 — однако не только через лицензию на ВикиСкладе, но и через письмо в OTRS. Это поможет ВикиСкладу уйти от суда.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS - это фикция, детские шалости, игра в шпиёнов, ничего она не может доказать, и избавить от ответственности.--Agent001 (talk) 09:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- На ВикиСкладе принято думать, что OTRS юридически переносит вину с фонда на участников. Вот и всё .--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- То есть?--Agent001 (talk) 12:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- По словам других участников, задача не в том, чтобы доказать права. Здесь не суд. Задача в том, чтобы отмазать ВикиСклад от претензий суда и взять эти претензии на себя.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- По словам участников — это красиво! Я вас призываю не слушать участников, которые, разумеется, будут рассуждать в своих интересах, а к здравому смыслу. В случае судебных претензий, OTRS никак не сможет отмазать фонд от ответственности — это хоть вы понимаете? --Agent001 (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS переписка покажет, что человек с таким-то именем, фамилией, отчеством, паспортные данные такие-то, присвоил себе чужие права и ввёл Фонд в заблуждение и поэтому должен выступать ответчиком, должен нести ответственность.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Суд скажет, что Фонд не мог безоговорочно доверять кем-то присланным сканам паспорта и другой ерунде. Левых сканов паспорта можно достать сколько угодно - это все равно что поверить не слово. Таким образом, допустим мошенник, по-приколу объявил чьи-то произведения в общественное достояние, и пропал. За время разбирательства ( скажем так, не быстрого разбирательства), настоящему правообладателю был нанесен коммерческий ущерб, кто ему возместит убытки? Мошенник? Во-первых его уже не найти. Во-вторых, виноват Фонд, который допустил халатность, и объявил свободными произведения, которые не самом деле несвободные.--Agent001 (talk) 10:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- В данном случае никто не возместит убытки. Это слабое место самой идеи публичных лицензий, где нет достоверных участников в договоре присоединения. Но другого способа, к сожалению, пока не существует.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Суд скажет, что Фонд не мог безоговорочно доверять кем-то присланным сканам паспорта и другой ерунде. Левых сканов паспорта можно достать сколько угодно - это все равно что поверить не слово. Таким образом, допустим мошенник, по-приколу объявил чьи-то произведения в общественное достояние, и пропал. За время разбирательства ( скажем так, не быстрого разбирательства), настоящему правообладателю был нанесен коммерческий ущерб, кто ему возместит убытки? Мошенник? Во-первых его уже не найти. Во-вторых, виноват Фонд, который допустил халатность, и объявил свободными произведения, которые не самом деле несвободные.--Agent001 (talk) 10:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS переписка покажет, что человек с таким-то именем, фамилией, отчеством, паспортные данные такие-то, присвоил себе чужие права и ввёл Фонд в заблуждение и поэтому должен выступать ответчиком, должен нести ответственность.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- По словам участников — это красиво! Я вас призываю не слушать участников, которые, разумеется, будут рассуждать в своих интересах, а к здравому смыслу. В случае судебных претензий, OTRS никак не сможет отмазать фонд от ответственности — это хоть вы понимаете? --Agent001 (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- По словам других участников, задача не в том, чтобы доказать права. Здесь не суд. Задача в том, чтобы отмазать ВикиСклад от претензий суда и взять эти претензии на себя.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- То есть?--Agent001 (talk) 12:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- На ВикиСкладе принято думать, что OTRS юридически переносит вину с фонда на участников. Вот и всё .--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS - это фикция, детские шалости, игра в шпиёнов, ничего она не может доказать, и избавить от ответственности.--Agent001 (talk) 09:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Что-то мне кажется, вы не туда принесли вопрос. Лучше спрашивайте об этом у волонтёров OTRS. Там больше шанса, что вам ответят по сути дела.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days (3 дня)[edit]
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days (3 дня) for the following reason: personal attack and offensive behaviour (личные выпады и оскорбления).
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block. العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
Per comments on your talkpage and village pump: for example, diff 1; diff 2, etc.rubin16 (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Поскольку у нас был конфликт, ты уверен, что имел право меня банить?--Agent001 (talk) 14:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- предварительные личные выпады в мою сторону хоть и делают блокировку не самым корректным моим действием, но не налагают 100% запрет блокировать - да, я уверен. rubin16 (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Вот стороннее мнение. Блокировка вызвана резкими фразами и потому основательна.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Может быть, но ее должен производить минимум не участник конфликта, который, я имею права это утверждать - сводит со мной счеты, используя админресурс. В этой вашей Википедии такие нормы четко прописаны--Agent001 (talk) 09:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Поскольку у нас был конфликт, ты уверен, что имел право меня банить?--Agent001 (talk) 14:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note that I asked the administrators to assess your recent behavior.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week[edit]
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: continuing your harassment and incivil behavior after the expiry of the previous block.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block. العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
- В общем, тут есть своя правда. Хотя вы задали идеально нужный вопрос, однако его никто не услышал, потому что всех отвлекала ругань.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- О чем речь?--Agent001 (talk) 21:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately for you, adding a speedy tag when your previous attempt to delete (which you couldn't explain your reasons for in a way that anyone could understand) was just definitively rejected, is pointless and annoying behavior. AnonMoos (talk) 08:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems[edit]
You're now under discussion there. AnonMoos (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Shark86.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
File:Shark84.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
File:Shark83.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Архив⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Agent001,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pozner new.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Order of the Gold Star копия.jpg[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/− |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Order of the Gold Star копия.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Order of the Gold Star копия.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |