User talk:Чръный человек/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Your Flickr uploads[edit]

Hello Чръный человек!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:

  • Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
  • You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!

Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Шановний, а Вам не соромно фальшувати авторство і ліцензію тих зображень, що Ви їх цупите?--Leonst (talk) 01:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Фальсификацией авторства я никогда не занимался. Что я там мог изменить? Я просто заимствовал из страницы описания файла те данные, которые там были, кроме лицензии, на которую я не обратил внимания ~ Чръный человек (talk) 10:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ви вказали неправильне авторство та ліцензію. Проте бачу вже що виправились після зауважень.--Leonst (talk) 05:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Что не так было с категориями? Vihljun (talk) 10:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Воронов_Ричардс_Джордан_Намин.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miss-Sophie (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Чръный человек, can you explain where you got the permission to put this picture on Wikimedia Commons? Did you take that picture yourself? The OTRS permission you gave is not very clear. Please answer on the nomination page that is linked above.--Miss-Sophie (talk) 11:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Привет! Я только плохо говорю по-русски. При твоей фотографии никакой автор нaзыван. Указания аннулировались давно. Ты писал "alois"". Можешь ли ты объяснять, кто Алоиз? Является ли он фотографом и дал ли он тебе разрешение для фотографии?--Miss-Sophie (talk) 17:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Привет. Well my english is't good. Elois - большой поклонник группы цветы "Цветы" (судя по эпитетам, котороми он нараждал группу в статье о ней). Он в своё время загрузил в русскую википедию большое число фотографий, так или иначе связанных с Стасом Наминым и группой "Цветы". Эти фотографии потом переносились на Викисклад. Судя по его информированности, со Стасом Наминым (и многими другими) он знаком лично. Был такой случай: я написал статью о гитаристе Сергее Воронове, но не нашёл его отчества и обратился к Алоизу; через некоторое время он ответил, что позвонил ему и узнал его отчество - Юрьевич. Всё это, а также тот факт, что под фотографиями стояла пометка OTRS дало мне основания не сомневаться в этих фотографиях. Что же касается именно этого фото, то я его немного подредактировал и загрузил на викисклад.
Я написал ему по википочте, что файлы собирабтся удалять, но ответа не было. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 13:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Orthodoxy[edit]

I'm guessing from some of your edits that you are at least clueful about Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Care to weigh in at Commons:Help_desk#Orthodox Churches? Know anyone else who should be invited to comment? - Jmabel ! talk 08:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Чръный человек. Excuse me, but I had to revert File:BASA 1318K-1-5908 Antim-I.jpg to its original version. It is much preferable to have the images, digitized from the State Archives looking as authentic and close to the original hardcopy as possible, whatever the (objective OR subjective) defects of these images might be. This consideration is actually a strict requirement for the digitizing staff of BASA and is one thing which the volunteers from COM:BASA have also accepted to obey.

In this sense, your retouch produced a rather different image. Any retouch (derivative work) is okay, yet it should be uploaded under a different filename and I advise you to use something like File:BASA 1318K-1-5908 Antim-I (retouched).jpg and crosslink both images in the parameter "other version". Thank you for your understanding. Spiritia 08:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Памятник Григорию Пономаренко в Краснодаре.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 22:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014[edit]

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Мы поговорили в рувики с Shakko и Xviona и пришли к выводу, что неизвестные портреты известных людей с сайта МИДа представляют собой новоделы. Предлагаю больше их не загружать. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 08:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

В категории Category:Aleksey Borisovich Lobanov-Rostovsky ещё несколько подобный портретов. Видимо их тоже удалять надо. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 08:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Добавление шаблона разрешения[edit]

Просто сообщаю, что не нужно самостоятельно размещать шаблоны разрешений OTRS. Это всё помечается специальным тегом (не знаю, видно ли тебе в истории), потом автоматически собирается, и волонтёрам OTRS приходится перепроверять всё это по второму разу. Требуй установки соответствующего шаблона разрешений от OTRS-агентов. --sasha (krassotkin) 11:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Дело в том, что я загрузил несколько фото отсюда. Но там в одних файлах стоит OTRS-шаблон, в других - нет. В этой категории Category:Sava (Vuković) фотографии кроме одной взяты именно оттуда. Хотел бы Вас попросит проверить - относится ли данная OTRS-разрешение к этим фото. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 11:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Протоиерей Александр Ильяшенко в 2015 году.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Дмитрий Медведев поздравил Патриарха Московского и всея Руси Кирилла с пятой годовщиной интронизации.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 13:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From left to right: Member of the Municipal Council of Komotini Nikolaos Sotirakopoulos (Νικόλαος Σωτηρακόπουλος), Metropolitan Bishop of Nilopolis Gennadios, Titular Metropolitan Bishop of Avlona Christodoulos, Evripidis Stylianidis, Mayor of Komotini Georgios Petridis, Metropolitan Bishop of Komotini Panteleimon, possibly random bistander or aide to one the two persons he is between, vice-mayor of Komotini Georgios Ziloudis (Γεώργιος Ζηλούδης). Wolfymoza (talk) 08:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Thanks. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 08:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

File:Επίσκεψη του Πρωθυπουργού Αλέξη Τσίπρα στην Τουρκία (18.11.2015) (23112740255).jpg Members of the Greek government, with archierarchs of the Ecumenical Throne (in Turkey) from left to right:

Alternate Minister of Immigration Policy Ioannis Mouzalas, Could not find, Minister for Foreign Affairs Nikos Kotzias, Government Spokesperson Olga Gerovasili, Metropolitan Bishop of Ikonium Theoliptos (Μητροπολίτης Iκονίου Θεόληπτος), Metropolitan Bishop of Princes Islands Iakovos (Μητροπολίτης Πριγκιποννήσων Ιάκωβος), Elder Metropolitan Bishop of Nikaia Konstantinos (Γέρων Μητροπολίτης Νικαίας Κωνσταντίνος), Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, Elder Metropolitan Bishop of Derkon Apostolos (Γέρων Μητροπολίτης Δέρκων Απόστολος) (not 100% sure), Metropolitan Bishop of Tranoupolis Germanos (Μητροπολίτης Τρανουπόλεως Γερμανός), Metropolitan Bishop of Philadelphia Meliton (Μητροπολίτης Φιλαδελφείας Μελίτων), Could not find, Metropolitan Bishop of Kydonion Athenagoras (Μητροπολίτης Κυδωνίων Αθηναγόρας), Metropolitan Bishop of Adrianoupolis Amfilochios (Μητροπολίτης Ανδριανουπόλεως Αμφιλόχιος), Bishop of Halicarnassos Adrianos (Επίσκοπος Αλικαρνασσού Αδριανός)

File:U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry meets with Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, His All Holiness Bartholomew I, and other church leaders in Istanbul, Turkey on April 13, 2013.jpg (Here is a better view of the persons in this meeting):

On the bottom right, Chief Secretary Archimandrite Bartholomew Samaras (Αρχιγραμματέας του Συνοδικού Γραφείου, Αρχιμανδρίτης Βαρθολομαίος Σαμαράς).

Beside the Ecumenical Patriarch, Metropolitan Bishop of Jersey Evangelos (Μητροπολίτης Νέας Ιερσέης Ευάγγελος)

File:Συνάντηση με τον Οικουμενικό Πατριάρχη κ.κ. Βαρθολομαίο (4134963921).jpg from left to right starting with Papandreou:

George Papandreou, Ecumenical Patriarch, Metropolitan Bishop of Sylivria Maximos (Μητροπολίτης Σηλυβρίας Μάξιμος) (then Great Archdeacon, Μέγας Αρχιδιάκονος), Chief Secretary of the Synodical Office, Archimandrite Bartholomew Samaras (Αρχιγραμματέας του Συνοδικού Γραφείου, Αρχιμανδρίτης Βαρθολομαίος Σαμαράς) (then Priest and Sub-Secretary of the Synodical Office), Metropolitan Bishop of Kydonion Athenagoras (Μητροπολίτης Κυδωνίων Αθηναγόρας) (then Great Archimandrite)

For the time being I can't find the others, most probably all of them had offices in the Patriarchate then.

Category[edit]

No, the correct should be Throne Room of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, since patriarchy means the period one held the place of Patriatch, e.g. "The patriarchy of Athinagoras lasted 24 years".

Also, pictures like this, that picture a red-gold couch, are not taken in the Throne Room, but I guest in an anteroom. This picture also is not at all in Constantinople, it's in Greece, I think in Athens. Wolfymoza (talk) 05:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From left to right, the Greek Ambassador in Ankara Kyriakos Loukakis (Κυριάκος Λουκάκης), Nikos Kotzias, the Patriarch, the General Secratary of the Ministry of Foreight Affairs Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos (Δημήτριος Παρασκευόπουλος), person of the Ministry of Foreight Affairs , same, the Greek General Consul in Istanbul Evaggelos Sekeris (Ευάγγελος Σεκερης), as before, as before. Wolfymoza (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Памятник погибшим у Нарвской заставы.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 14:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why "temples" rather than "churches"? Very unusual word for this in English, as far as I know. - Jmabel ! talk 14:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:49, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Троицкий собор (Энгельс).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Троицкий собор (Энгельс).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 09:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lozina Lozinsky 1928.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lozina Lozinsky 1928.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

НоуФрост (talk) 23:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Иларион (Троицкий).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Иларион (Троицкий).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

НоуФрост (talk) 15:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Иларион (Троицкий).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

НоуФрост (talk) 17:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Русские медицинские работники.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 08:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wp kirilo mefod monastyr svalyava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Эфтим I Эрнерол.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 19:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Свято-Покровский Собор (Александрия).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Свято-Покровский Собор (Александрия).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dogad75 (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Посмотрите <https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Святопокровськийсобор.jpg>. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Колокольня Успенской церкви в 2005 году.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Колокольня Успенской церкви в 2005 году.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Категории объектов культурного наследия[edit]

Категории ОКН нужно оформлять соответствующим образом. Прошу в будущем учесть при создании новых категорий. --A.Savin 00:17, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

И опять-таки. Category:Bell tower сhurch of the Epiphany of Nikolo-Peshnoshsky Monastery - ??? Во-первых, если уж на то пошло, "Bell tower of the church..." Во-вторых, у неё есть свой номер ОКН -- см. мой комментарий выше. В-третьих, нужны материнские категории, как минимум, Bell towers in Moscow Oblast, год постройки. К вам обращаться на вашей странице обсуждения бесполезно в принципе? А для чего тогда она существует? --A.Savin 00:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ещё про категории[edit]

Category:Nudol river. Неужели так трудно подобрать для этого более подходящие категории, чем Rivers of Russia? Если вы не знаете, как создавать и оформлять здесь категории, вы не должны это делать (и уж тем более не в массовом порядке) --A.Savin 00:29, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Считаете ниже вашего достоинства отвечать? Ладно, вашу халтуру последних нескольких недель я исправлю, но на будущее считайте это административным предупреждением. Так не должно быть на все века, чтобы за вами постоянно нужно было убираться. --A.Savin 02:38, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Я не считаю ниже своего достоинства отвечать. Но, признаюсь, что Ваш тон не вызывает желания с Вами общаться. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 07:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish[edit]

Hello. Help [1]. Thanks you.125.214.49.198 08:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Алиса Аркадьевна Ганиева.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yann (talk) 14:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Точно ли он? Табличка перед ним гласит об ином. Alex Spade (talk) 13:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2019-08-10 17-57 - Народные игры.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2019-08-10 17-57 - Народные игры.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dogad75 (talk) 18:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2019-08-10 17-55 - Народные игры (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2019-08-10 17-55 - Народные игры (3).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dogad75 (talk) 18:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019-08-10 16-58 - Вера Горячкина и Марина Жиронкина.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 18:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019-08-10 17-13 - Оксана Шашуто и Вера Горячкина.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 18:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Совещание архиереев РПЦЗ под председательством Иоанна (Максимовича) в монастыре преп. Иова Почаевского в Мюнхене.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your two last uploads[edit]

Hi. please don't forget to link to the page containing the image, not to the image itself. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Митрополит Крутицкий и Коломенский Ювеналий в 2016 году.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A00:1FA0:423B:8B5B:0:1E:2EF8:9401 16:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Фото рабатского храма[edit]

Не подскажете ли, зачем это было сделано? Теперь везде надо удалять это изображение, которое благодаря вашей правке установилось в качестве основного в целом ряде статей на разных языках. К вашему сведению, таким храм выглядел только в 2009-2010 году. Никогда ранее он не был с красным куполом, и пока мы не провели реконструкцию и не покрыли его голубой керамикой, купол выглядел коричневым, как и все крыши вокруг. То есть это было временное решение. Жалею, что загрузил эту фотографию в 2012 году. Тогда ещё никто не думал о необходимости реконструкции храма, которая стала неизбежной в начале 2013 года в виду аварийного состояния здания. И. Максим (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Я не могу понять в чём моя вина. Разве на фото что-то неприличное изображено? Заменить фотографию в карточке - это совсем недолго. Пусть храм так выглядел недолго, но это же было. Так пусть фото сохраняется ради истории. А новое фото надо грузить под новым названием. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 16:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Я задал вам вопрос о цели вашей правки, а не о её богословском обосновании (вина, неприлично, грех и пр.). Цель мне осталась непонятной. Вы не ответили на вопрос. В следующий раз предлагаю загружать фотографию под новым названием. То "новое" фото, которое вы заменили, было загружено 4 года назад. Старое фото тоже было моим. При желании сохранить старое фото лучше было бы загрузить его под другим названием, а не подставлять неактуальную и вводящую в заблуждение фотографию в добрую дюжину статей. После реконструкции поменялся не только цвет купола. Поэтому под Russian Orthodox Church in Rabat.jpg надо было оставить фотографию 2015 года, а фото 2009 года лучше было бы именовать Russian Orthodox Church in Rabat - 2009.jpg или наподобие. И. Максим (talk) 21:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Я исходил из того, что новые фотографии должны загружаться под новыми (уникальными) именами, а не поверх уже загруженных. Цель моей правки заключалась в том, чтобы сохранить обе фотографии - и новую и старую. Я заменил фото в "дюжине статей". ~ Чръный человек (talk) 21:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Александр Волков в 1917 году.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:40, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Visheclavtsev Boris Petrovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VLu (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Космодемьянская Зоя Анатольевна.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Jonah (Paffhausen) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Glorious 93 (talk) 10:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:P 2017-07-16 13-02-00.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:P 2017-07-16 17-09-14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Епископ Ямбургский Алексий (Симанский).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Алексий (Симанский).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Монах Алексий (Симанский) на 2-м курсе Московской Духовной академии.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BASA-1735K-1-410-2-Aleksey Vserusiyski, Paisiy Vrachanski, Ekzarh Stefan, Grigoriy Leningradski, Arhimandrid Aleksandar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Архимандрит Алексий (Симанский).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BASA-1735K-1-410-1-Evlogi Slivenski, Ekzarh Stefan, Aleksey Vserusiyski, Grigoriy Leningradski, Dimo Kazasov, Paisiy Vrachanski, Arhimandrid Aleksandar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сергей Владимирович Симанский.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Серафим (Лукьянов), Феодор (Поздеевский), Сергий (Страгородский), Ювеналий (Масловский), Алексий (Симанский), Корнилий (Соболев).jp has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Члены Священного Синода, избранные на Архиерейском Соборе 1943 года.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017-07-22 10-18. Икона на походном храме.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Валентин Феликсович Войно-Ясенецкий.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Иннокентий (Пустынский) и Валентин Войно-Ясенецкий.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE[edit]

Коллега, добрый день. На викискладе есть правило - COM:SCOPE. Оно говорит о том, что не стоит на Викисклад грузить те фотографии, которые не представляют из себя ценности для иллюстрирования энциклопедических статей. Я конечно поставлю разрешение OTRS на 327 фотографий в категории Category:2016 “Bratya” Summer Festival, но готовьтесь к тому, что большая их часть будет удалена на основании этого правила. Разрешение OTRS - это подтверждение авторских прав, но не индульгенция на нарушение других правил Викисклада. Может не надо было столько загружать? Может надо было выбрать только реально нужные? --NoFrost (talk) 17:10, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Наверное стоило загружать поменьше, но с другой стороны тот факт, что скорость интернета и автоматизация загрузки позволяют грузить подобные фотографии даже не сотнями, а тысячами, не очень способствует раздумьям на эту тему. Мой опыт присутствия на Викискладе подсказывает, что принцип ценности для иллюстрирования энциклопедических статей многими не принимается в расчёт. Вот я и подумал, что если фотографии хорошие, то пусть будут. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]