User:A.Savin/Archive/2019/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Tektronix M377 instrumentation amp simplified.png

Просьба: убейте первую версию этого файла и ведущий на него редирект File:Complementary long-tailed pair (high speed unity buffer).png. Там <мои> грубейшие ошибки. Retired electrician (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vladimir asv2019-01 img10 Water Tower.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vladimir asv2019-01 img10 Water Tower.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Обращение

Добрый день. Возвращаюсь по поводу этих файлов. File:Flag of the Bashkir ASSR (1926-1937).svg и File:Флаг АБССР (1925-1937).gif. Теперь их можно удалить? Валко (talk) 12:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 12:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Спасибо. Валко (talk) 13:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Добрый день! Хотел связаться с вами насчет вашей фотографии Триумфальных ворот. Быть может, вы могли бы предоставить мне электронный адрес или другие контактные данные

I'm really curious, what account were you reffering to?

Your comments at my adminship discussion were very vague and puzzling. Whatever user you were referring to, you should have formally requested a checkuser instead of making very vague accusation. I have never been globally banned, and because you did not name names I don't know what information you want. Were you trying to accuse me of being part of the Mejlis or something? Because I'm not.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

I wrote: "Some similarities to a certain globally-banned account are hopefully coincidental". That means for me as much as: "I'm not accusing you so far, but should someone notice even more similarities and make an RfCU out of them, I wouldn't oppose it either". --A.Savin 17:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Either bring up a check user or don't mention it at all - the admin nomination is not where such comments belong. And you keep dodging the question - what banned account are you referring to? What similar edits make you think such things? What are the "similarities" that you are even looking for? What the heck do you want? What was the purpose of bringing up such a vague and confusing statement with negative implications? You brought it up. Now please name the account so that I can clear my name with an RfCU.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
I hope you see how your statement is certainly troublesome. Apparently some of my edits that you are unwilling to specify resemble that of a banned account that you are also unwilling to specify, and if you are asked for further information you continue to reply with non-answers. How do I know that you didn't just make the whole thing up in the first place to hurt my character? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and it is rude to suggest the possibility of someone being a sockpuppet without even naming the banned account and evidences against them. What if I commented something like that about you, and continued to refuse to specify anything about who I thought you were or why yet continued to maintain to have noticed unspecified similarities to an unspecified problem-maker? Wouldn't you be a little offended or want to be able to clear your name with a RfCU?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
There is a banned user indeed, who a) was banned some months before you registered, b) is interested in aviation, c) is native English speaker with claimed understanding in reading Russian, d) is aggressive and seeking conflicts. So, yes, some similarities, which hopefully are coincidental. I will not call them by name because a) not willing to give them more importance than they deserve, b) someone who IS willing already did it, as you may have read. No comments anymore: if you think that I crossed the PA border and called you a sock (I didn't, but maybe I'm alone with this assessment), please go to COM:ANU. --A.Savin 20:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
I joined in December 2015 and didn't start writing aviation articles until much later, originally just uploading photos of planes at BWI to Commons. My first article Advanced Bionics was deleted for notability issues, and after a lot of notability problems I eventually settled on translation. If you read my enwiki userpage, you will see that I articles I created that weren't Soviet are the earlier ones, and all the more recent ones are the Soviet stuff. I just started going through Russavias edits and veiwing his former userpage, but it seems like all he did was create redirects and stubs. What a useless and unproductive user. And to think he called himself a Russofile and praised the Tu-104 death trap! I probably would have gotten into quite a few spats with him if he wasn't already blocked when I started writing my articles.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kirov Oblast Zuevka railway station asv2019-05 img2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirov Oblast Zuevka railway station asv2019-05 img2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

User:Alexandronikos / User:Создательница

Приветствую. FYI - m:User_talk:Kaganer#Блокировка. Почему он(а) именно мне написал(а) - не ведаю, так что просто информирую.--Kaganer (talk) 15:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Категории

Ворота и заборы - это малые архитектурные формы, разве нет?--Мечников (talk) 18:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Да. Но не уличная мебель. --A.Savin 18:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
В английском street furniture и есть малые арх.формы, furniture — мебель, обстановка, оборудование, инвентарь. Во всяком случае в википедии эти статьи связаны в интервики--Мечников (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Не знаю, что там решили в Википедии. В англовики множество примеров уличной мебели, ворот и заборов там нет. Здесь всё понятнее. Category:Gates не связана с Category:Street furniture. Если честно, я бы удивился, если бы было иначе. Едва ли межкомнатные двери или стальную дверь для вашей квартиры вы купите в мебельном магазине. --A.Savin 19:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment

Hi! Please comment. --Микола Василечко (talk) 13:47, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Moscow Brateevo Floodplain asv2018-08 img4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow Brateevo Floodplain asv2018-08 img4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Отмена правки в File:Moscow 05-2017 img13 Krymsky Bridge.jpg

С чего это? Это про реку, её видно почти не хуже моста. --AVRS (talk) 01:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Я руководствуюсь правилом Commons:Depicts#Generic_items: если Крымский мост (Москва), то это включает и Москва-реку. --A.Savin 02:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
По-моему, там написано, что добавление элементов, один из которых является под/надклассом или частным случаем другого, было бы overcategorization, а не наоборот (что было бы странно). А мост не является подклассом реки (то, что его категория может быть подкатегорией реки, — недостаток системы категорий по сравнению с Викиданными). В File:Крымский_мост_ВДОЛЬ_-_panoramio.jpg реки не видно. К тому же, там можно указать, какие объекты наиболее заметны. --AVRS (talk) 03:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Хорошо, исправил. --A.Savin 13:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Savin!

Hi Mr. Savin, I'm very glad to reach you out! Actually I would like to ask if it's possible for you to update the information of this page? As I found most of the information is outdated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DJI_(company) Would appriciate your help on this! Thanks!

Maxineblinx (talk) 04:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

JJ Harrison editing discussion on Commons FPC

Hi. As I said on the current FP nom, I have been in discussion with JJ about blurring foregrounds etc. and he has assured me he doesn't do it. This is really tricky for me as I don't have the same equipment. Can you have a look closely at the foreground of this photo. Am I seeing things? It so looks like manual blurring. I'd love to be proved wrong. BTW, it's a nom on English Wikipedia FP and I've opposed on aesthetic grounds. Thanks. Charles (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

I don't know, it looks unnatural to me anyway, and given the seagull picture that looks like a montage, everything is possible to me. He has been active in the meantime, but didn't respond to e-mail, nor on the FPC nom; probably considering himself particularly special (I knowe this sort of people). --A.Savin 13:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for having a look anyway. Charles (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Нужна помощь в замене основного фото Галушка, Александр Сергеевич

Здравствуйте Савин! пожскажите пожалуйста, сможете ли Вы выгрузить фото Alexander Galushka как делали это раньше? само фото мы предоставим, у нас не получатся это сделать так как мы скорее всего не обладаем проверенной вики уч записью]] https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0,_%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80_%D0%A1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87

Вас не устраивает существующая иллюстрация, или в чём вопрос? --A.Savin 13:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

[[Category:Да именно так, он желает заменить фото и добавить описание, готовы оплатить Ваши услуги

Спасибо, но мне это не надо. Иллюстрацию следует менять только в том случае, если новая заведомо лучше. --A.Savin 12:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bogolyubovo asv2019-01 img02 Intercession Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bogolyubovo asv2019-01 img02 Intercession Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Vulphere 18:55, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Category:Ships by name

Refer my request. I have already (one year ago) gone to Commons:Categories for discussion, or talk to the creator of the category. The Administrator in question refuses to follow policy. What can I do now? Broichmore (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

If you have the impression that the creator ignores your question and continues creating wrong categories, why don't you then report them at COM:ANU. But in this form, it's no UP for sure. --A.Savin 14:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
So it's in the right place? but the wrong format? Can you point me to an example to follow, thanks? Broichmore (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
See other threads on COM:ANU. And you should point out where is incorrect behaviour and provide diff links etc. --A.Savin 15:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Moscow Metro Dobryninskaya asv2018-09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow Metro Dobryninskaya asv2018-09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019


Hallo A.Savin,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2019

Hi Alexander, Hope you are doing well. We would love to have you as one of our honoured judges for the upcoming Wiki Loves Monuments, India 2019. We really hope you would accept this and help us with your expertise. Please do let us know if you have any particular ideas or anything else you think we should know. --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Sumit, thanks for interest. Can you say something about the time schedule, and how it goes technically? If mainly a semi-automatic tool such as "Montage" is used, it's OK for me, yet I'm afraid that long e-mailing and/or IRC is not quite my cup of tea. --A.Savin 18:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for considering our proposal Alexander. Yes, we would be using Montage and emails would be used mainly to notify judges when a judging round starts and if there is anything specific to be discussed. The initial screening rounds will be done by the WLM India team and judges will have to decide on the top images to choose the national winning 10. The judges round will start between 10th and 15th October and we plan to complete it by 25th of October so that we can submit the final 10 by end of that month. Please do let me know if you have any other queries. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
OK, that sounds reasonable. I'll be happy to help. --A.Savin 09:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. We would add your name to our list of juries. Could you please let us know which image should we use against your name there? --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
@Sumitsurai: You may use this. --A.Savin 14:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:E-burg asv2019-05 img46 view from VysotSky.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:E-burg asv2019-05 img46 view from VysotSky.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

помощь с лицензией файла

как перенести файл из английской вики в нашу? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cambridge_Advanced_Learner%27s_Dictionary_3rd.jpeg --DragonSpace (talk) 20:57, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Если есть в какой статье использовать -- можно под лицензией Добросовестного использования, но я не знаю точно, как её оформлять. --A.Savin 23:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • да, есть в статье https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Advanced_Learner%27s_Dictionary это изображение. статью я перевел, а изображение перенести не могу, их нет на викискладе. кто может помочь их перенести? новичкам здесь разобраться безумно сложно, поэтому прошу простить навязчивость, если не знаете кто разбирается в изображениях, пойду искать дальше) --DragonSpace (talk) 10:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • спасибо, вроде понял принцип и получилось загрузить файл. --DragonSpace (talk) 14:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blond child with blue eyes.jpg

Hi, I don't object here, but in principle, you have to wait for 24 h. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

I am sorry (though if you would choose your nominations carefully, that would not have been an issue). --A.Savin 20:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Вандал

Yroiu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) обессрочен в английской и русской Википедиях. Раммон (talk) 14:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Railway photographs taken on 2014-04-03 and similar

Hello A.Savin. I did not create the original category for this I’m just adding it were relevant. Some times the day date category become so enlarged that a category just for a particular subject could prove to be very useful. As for the templat. Surely you cant object to a gentle reminder, especially for the young who may be interested in photographing trains. In future I will not edited any of your contributions to this category.Kolforn (talk) 06:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Юрьевская пещера.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Юрьевская пещера.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

FAL

  • Вы публикуетесь под лицензией Free Art, а я использую CC-BY-SA для своих работ. Скажите пожалуйста, чем лицензия Free Art лучше? Отчего вы её предпочитаете? Спасибо! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems reversion

Sorry for the misclick! DMacks (talk) 04:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Массовая ошибка

Добрый день. При заливке фото допустил ошибку. Нужно исправить названия файлов с "File:Крым, Варламов, март 2013, 02.jpg" на "Крым, Варламов, март 2014, 02.jpg". Есть ли возможность исправить это в автоматическом режиме или придется исключительно в ручном режиме исправлять? Спасибо. --Mitte27 (talk) 04:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

К сожалению, не знаю. --A.Savin 07:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Global lock for PavelMuhin99

Would you request global lock for them? The other sockpuppets accounts of Панн are locked. --VKras (talk) 19:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done. --A.Savin 19:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Благодарю! Mayyskiyysergeyy (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Sperrandohung

Hallo A.Savin! Als Administrator solltest Du Dir

  1. ansehen warum sich hier alle duzen, was wohl auch für Commons gelten dürfte und
  2. ansehen mit wem Du es zu tun hast, ehe Du jemanden bezichtigst (QI Nominierung für File:Grub_Kellergasse_Berggasse_17.jpg), er würde bewußte Störaktionen betreiben, was ich nur als ungeheuerliche Unterstellung bezeichnen kann, die einem Admin nicht zusteht und ihn in dieser Funktion disqualifiziert.

Meine Kameraprobleme sind inzwischen sattsam bekannt und dürften nur bei Dir noch nicht angekommmen sein, weshalb ich sie bei dem beanstandeten Foto nochmals ausführlich geschildert habe. Und da ich auf dem Display meines Notebooks die offenbar zu Recht beanstandeten Fehler nicht erkennen kann, ist es mir auch nicht möglich, allfällige fehlerhafte Aufnahmen vor der Nominierung auszuscheiden. So bleiben mir nur zwei Möglichkeiten: Entweder weitere „Störaktionen“ zu betreiben oder Dir anzubieten, meine für eine Nominierung vorgesehenen Fotos vorher zu sichten.

Alle meine Tätigkeiten sowohl in WP als auch in Commons zielen darauf ab, Leute die diese Medien lediglich zu Auskunftszwecken nutzen, auch zur aktiven Mitarbeit zu animieren. Und weil es auch in WP ähnliche Vorfälle gibt, so ist es nicht verwunderlich, daß die meisten meiner Mentees sehr bald nach ihrer durchaus erfolgten „Grundausbildung“ im Mentorenprogramm sehr bald das Handtuch geworfen haben. MfG--M@nfred (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

a) Auf Commons gibt es kein Zwangs-Duzen, Sie sind offensichtlich sehr viel älter als ich und haben mir nicht explizit das Duzen angeboten, also gebietet es mir persönlich die Höflichkeit, das Sie-Anrede zu benutzen.
b) "Meine Kameraprobleme [...] dürften [...] bei Dir noch nicht angekommmen sein": falsch.
c) Ich habe Ihnen nicht mit Sperre gedroht. Das wäre der Fall, wenn ich eine ausdrückliche Warnung auf Ihrer Diskussionsseite oder sonstwo erlassen hätte mit der Bitte, Ihre Aktionen zu unterlassen.
d) Sie haben eine dritte Möglichkeit ausgespart: einfach das exzessive Nominieren vorerst sein zu lassen und erst wieder aufzunehmen, wenn der Sensor repariert ist und neue Fotos keine Streifen mehr haben. Aber Bescheidenheit war wohl noch nie Ihre Stärke und es muss wirklich alles den grünen Siegel bekommen.
MfG --A.Savin 13:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:E-burg asv2019-05 img49 Opera and Ballet House.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:E-burg asv2019-05 img49 Opera and Ballet House.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 India - Jury Round

Hi @A.Savin: , Hope you are doing fine. We have created the first jury round and added you. The first round is about eliminating the images you think is not suitable for the competition. We plan to complete this round by 18th of October. Please do let me know if you have any queries. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Alexander, the first round has been completed and we have created round 2. This would be the final round where you need to rank the images. The round we plan to end by 22nd of this month. Please do let me know if you have any queries. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
@Sumitsurai: Can you explain, how to rate the pictures? I see there no such possibility. --A.Savin 13:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alexander, there is some problem in Montage about ranking more than 100 images as found out by one jury. I am pausing the round to check. Will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 14:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Montage is not supporting more than 100 images for ranking, so I changed it to rating in this round. Really sorry that we would have to do a final ranking round after this. Do let me know if there are any other issues. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alexander, I have created the final round. In this round, you need to rank the final 52 images. We plan to end this round by 24th of this month. I am emailing you about the details of ranking images. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
@Sumitsurai: ✓ Done. --A.Savin 22:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Alexander. --Sumit Surai (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ivanovo asv2018-08 img05 Railway station.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ivanovo asv2018-08 img05 Railway station.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I nominated your video at Commons:Featured video candidates

it can be found at Commons:Featured_video_candidates#File:Otto-Maigler-See_Huerth_asv10-2017_video.webm. If you wish you can vote too. Best, Eatcha (talk) 13:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

FPs/FVs

Hi,

I saw you added some FVs to categories for FPs. Was this an accident, or are the categories going to be shared? My sense is that only files which have gone through the FPC process should be in FP categories? — Rhododendrites talk |  19:32, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

What is the difference? AFAIK, for FV promotion the same level of support is necessary. --A.Savin 19:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Just a different process with different kinds of standards applied. Same number of supports, but there are things being promoted at FVC that would not necessarily have been promoted at FPC, for example. I don't feel very strongly about it -- only that it should be consistent. — Rhododendrites talk |  21:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
I'm not 100% sure what Eatcha was thinking when they separated FVC from FPC, but in my understanding, formerly FPC promoted videos are automatically Featured videos now, and any video, to get promoted nowadays, has to be nominated on FVC rather than FPC which is now only left for still pictures such as photos, artworks, graphics, maps, etc. So, if we still assume that a video is a picture too, and videos that get promoted on FVC receive same "Featured video" label as videos that had been promoted on FPC, I see no logical inconsistence in categorizing Featured videos as "Featured pictures". --A.Savin 00:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
I actually like that it's a separate process. I think that COM:FSC probably doesn't have much a future, and perhaps should merge into WP:FVC to create on "featured media" or something, but there has never been particularly good criteria that apply for video, and it seems like people at FPC have at times struggled to apply typical criteria to them. It's possible it could just be changed, but I think having a specific process for video may, in time, encourage more people to work with video. We'll see.
As for what counts, I don't think there's been any substantial discussion on the matter. I think it was just Eatcha that turned videos that were promoted through FPC into FVs. IMO the processes should stay separate, and video FPs should only be tagged as FVs if they pass through that process. Regardless, but it didn't strike me as making sense to turn Featured Videos into Featured Pictures (there's a logic in turning videos under pictures into videos, but not videos under videos into pictures). These are probably things best discussed in a central location. Again, I don't really have strong opinions, though. — Rhododendrites talk |  01:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Rhododendrites

Are you aware of Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates/Archive_21#Export_Videos_to_FV_(without_delisting_from_FP_list) -- Eatcha (talk) 02:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Ah! No, I had not seen that. Thanks, and apologies. Struck that part above. — Rhododendrites talk |  02:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin and Rhododendrites, should I add a auto-categorization based on category ? We don't have many users, automation of simple tasks should help IMHO. Explanation: Commons:Featured video candidates/File:Lake Urmia Google Earth Timelapse 1984–2018.webm should automatically be added into Category:Featured videos of time-lapse after creation of the category. Best, -- Eatcha (talk) 03:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Вопрос про оформление лицензии

Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, как правильно оформить лицензию этого файла. Раммон (talk) 07:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

А разрешите спросить, на каком основании вы считаете этот документ свободным? --A.Savin 14:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
На том основании, что:
  1. я сам отсканировал этот документ из личного архива своего умершего деда;
  2. это официальный документ, на который не распространяются ограничения, связанные с авторским правом. Раммон (talk) 08:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Попробуйте с {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --A.Savin 14:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Спасибо. А в качестве автора мне указывать себя? Раммон (talk) 06:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Нет, сканирование не обосновывает авторские права. Следует удалить лицензию CC-BY-SA, оставив всё прочее как есть. --A.Savin 15:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank You !!!

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India - Jury Barnstar
Hi Alexander, we are grateful for your precious time and energy, which you used to judge the photographs of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India and select the winners. This is a small token of appreciation to you from the organizing team. You are awesome! --Sumit Surai (talk) 13:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Avempace.jpg

Добрый день. В названии и описании файла написано, что это фото , но эта фотография - часть фото Абу Бакра Мухаммада ар-Рази. Файл уже давно используется в 27 статьях, поэтому его лучше удалить. Maqivi (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Проверка лицензии файлов

Добрый день, уважаемый A.Savin. Пишу Вам, так как не смог найти шаблона проверки лицензии на викискладе.

Обнаружил, что участник Volodomrson71193 массово заливает фотографии автомобилей "Москвич" со ссылками на сайт drive2.ru. Его фото - фото Москвичей 2142 и 2141. Названия:

Владелец автомобилей написан один, автор фотографии указан другой. По нику - вообще невозможно понять, автор ли это. Могли бы Вы проверить допустимость использования файлов, залитых этим участником, за викискладе?

С уважением, --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 14:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Выставил на удаление. --A.Savin 14:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

can't assess

Hallo, ich kann diese edits nicht recht einschätzen. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 09:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

He submitted screenshots where he asked authors of nominated photos for permission. However I cannot see any mention of CC-BY-4.0 there, so probably they have to be deleted anyway. --A.Savin 14:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Ответ

Здравствуйте. Дайте время на то, чтобы я попросил владельцев подтвердить в переписке выбор лицензии. Постараюсь сделать это как можно быстрее, но это также зависит от них — от того, когда они откроют сайт http://www.drive2.ru/ и/или ответят мне. Это может занять как минимум несколько дней. --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 13:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

@Volodomrson71193: Даже если файлы к тому времени успеют удалить, их всегда можно восстановить, так что не беспокойтесь. --A.Savin 13:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin Один из владельцев отозвался, и у меня возникает такой вопрос — позволяется ли сменять тип лицензии? Он выбрал «CC BY-SA 4.0». --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Если предыдущая была CC-BY 4.0, то можно. --A.Savin 00:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin … а другой выбрал «CC0 1.0», и у него до этого тоже было «CC BY 4.0». --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 08:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin Здравствуйте. Осталось дождаться ответа третьего владельца; но сегодня мне напечатали следующее — http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Volodomrson71193#Files_uploaded_by_Volodomrson71193_%28talk_%C2%B7_contribs%29 Объясните пожалуйста, что меня просят сделать. --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 10:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Вас не просят делать именно так, но это упрощает фотографу процедуру выдачи разрешения. Фотограф копирует тамошний текст, шлёт его по е-майлу на permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, и ждёт подтверждения. После чего файлы, если всё корректно, помечаются как подтверждённые и снимаются с удаления. --A.Savin 15:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin Надо уточнить… Фотограф — это владелец? Сгодится любая электронная почта? Нужно скопировать и вставить в сообщение эл. почты всё (32 строки)? --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Вообще-то, по умолчанию, владельцем авторских прав на фотографию является именно её фотограф. Для того, чтобы разрешение выглядело правдоподобным, желательно использовать свой постоянный адрес электронной почты, а не какой-нибудь одноразовый, и да, текст можно дословно скопировать. --A.Savin 20:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin Я имею ввиду, имеет ли значение происхождение эл. почты — российская она (http://e.mail.ru/) или какая-нибудь Западная? --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 07:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Нет --A.Savin 13:41, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin Почему в тексте эл. письма тот, кто должен его отправить, указан как "представитель www.drive2.ru"? И почему напечатано "Volodomrson71193"? Непонятно, то ли письмо должен отправить я, то ли владелец фотографий, то ли вообще владелец сайта www.drive2.ru . --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 05:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Правьте смело. --A.Savin 12:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin То есть, электронное письмо с моего адреса отправить? --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 10:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
A.Savin Поздно, уже всё удалили. Подскажите мне, к кому надо обратиться, чтобы восстановить свои фотографии. --Volodomrson71193 (talk) 07:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by A.Savin/Czechia renamed

Hello, A.Savin. In the process of resolving some duplicate photographs categories for the country of Czechia/Czech Republic, I needed to change a parameter for the invocation of User:A.Savin/F in various files. Here is an example of the change I made. It needed to be done because there were photographs categories with duplicate dates (for example, Czech Republic photographs taken on <date> and Czechia photographs taken on <same date>).

That modification changed the name of the general photographs categories, but it also changed the name of Category:Photographs by A.Savin/Czechia. To resolve this, I renamed that category. I'm letting you know in case you want that category to keep the name "Czechia". You could change your user template so that it uses different country names for that category and the general one (for example, Category:Czech Republic photographs taken on 2016-07-20). I'm sorry for any inconvenience this causes. Feel free to let me know if you'd like more information. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Доказать права на фотографии со студийной съемки.

Здравствуйте. Посоветовали обратиться к Вам за помощью как действовать, если при загрузке фото на викисклад получил предпреждение типа: File:Viktoriia Motrichko 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Фотографии сделаны при оказании услуг студийной съемки, фотограф имел денежное вознаграждение и не против размещения данных фотографий. Что необходимо сделать, чтобы легализовать данные фотографии на wikiскладе? Возможно требуется привлечение фотографа?

Претензия к файлу, что он ранее появился на странице facebook, где наряду со своей женой являюсь администратором страницы: This media file has been nominated for deletion since 14 December 2019. To discuss it, please visit the nomination page. Do not remove this tag until the deletion nomination is closed. Reason for the nomination: Copy of the image without correct licencing that appears on another website: https://business.facebook.com/ViktoriiaMotrichko/photos/a.526698947789342/737865916672643/?type=3&theater

Прошу удалить фотографии штампа https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shtamp.jpg и удостоверения https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zmsu_motrichko.jpg с Викисклада - по правилам таким изображениям там не место.

Заранее благодарю.

Нужно, чтобы фотограф подтвердил своё разрешение через службу поддержки. Для этого следуйте инструкции на Commons:OTRS/ru --A.Savin 01:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Spb StMichael Castle asv2019-09 img11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spb StMichael Castle asv2019-09 img11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Afar asv2018-01 img100 Ertale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment - Same here. Give credit to the photographer and use the proper format. -- Ikan Kekek 12:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The information got already added --undefined 05:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 Support Thank you. Very difficult photo, sharp view of the lava chamber. -- Ikan Kekek 11:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2020! ;–)

Happy Holidays, A.Savin/Archive/2019
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
  • Frohe Weihnachten! Ein gutes neues Jahr!

--Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

fsin.su

Здравствуйте. Хотел бы уточнить у Вас - правильно ли я понял из этого обсуждения, что я могу загружать на викисклад картинки с fsin.su? Если да, то какую лицензию нужно указывать? Раммон (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

С тем же успехом из сказанного там можно сделать вывод, что белое - это черное. Почитайте COM:Лицензирование#Разрешённые лицензии. --VLu (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img100 Ertale.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Boathouses in Russia

  • Получается смешение: в одной категории стоит "лодочный павильон... для хранения лодок" (Муромцево) и Ботный дом, который был построен как центр музея-усадьбы. Вынести ботик из Ботного дома невозможно, окна и двери не позволяют такого, поэтому ботик был внесён в Ботный дом во время строительства стен. Не зная, что делать, хочу подчеркнуть многосмысленность и разнобой. Ботный дом не является ни transport buildings, ни water transport, потому что он не лодочный сарай, а музей. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)