Commons:Images de valeur candidates/Intro
Ce sont les candidats au titre d'image de valeur. Veuillez noter que ce n'est pas la même chose que les images remarquables ni que les images de qualité. Si vous souhaitez seulement un retour sur vos images, vous pouvez l'obtenir sur la page des critiques de photographies. Les images isolées peuvent être proposées au statut d'images de valeur (VI, Valued Image) et les séries d'images au statut de séries d'images de valeur (VIS, Valued Image Set). Les candidats doivent être proposés comme étant de plus grande valeur parmi toutes les images de Commons correspondant à un domaine. L'évaluation est menée en se référant aux critères des images de valeur. Une évaluation entre images en compétition (MVR, Most Valued Review) a lieu lorsque deux candidats ou plus sont nominés au sein du même domaine. Les règles concernant la promotion peuvent être trouvées sur Commons:Images de valeur candidates/Règles de promotion. Une image ayant été précédemment refusée peut être nominée à nouveau pour le même domaine uniquement si les problèmes ayant conduit au refus ont été résolus. Les images précédemment nominées et qui ont été classées comme undecided (indécis) peuvent toujours être renominées. Une fois qu'un candidat obtient le statut de VI ou de VIS, il ne peut être destitué que si un meilleur candidat le remplace durant une MVR. Si vous souhaitez nominer une image ou une série pour le statut de VI, merci de suivre les instructions ci-dessous. Si vous proposez un meilleur candidat pour un domaine comportant déjà un VI, merci d'ouvrir une MVR. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
How to nominate an image for VI statusNominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Critères des images de valeur. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review. Adding a new nomination (image)Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button. Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage. Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:
so that it looks like this: {{VICs ... |My-image-filename.jpg }} and save the candidate list. RenominationDeclined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review. Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination. Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination. Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in |date={{subst:VI-time}} Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review). Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with |nominator=~~~ Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.
|review= {{subst:VIC-archive}} }}
Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list. How to open a Most Valued ReviewThere must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: === Scope === {{VICs |candidate1.jpg |candidate2.jpg }} where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR. The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.
Comment évaluer les candidatsHow to review an imageAny registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it). Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Critères des images de valeur. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.
Review procedure
Changes in scope during the review periodThe nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn. |