|
|
|
View |
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-04-18 04:53 (UTC) |
Scope:
Wall panel in the Reformierte Kirche Zernez |
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland. |
The scope should be "Wall panel in ..." or "Plaque in ..." instead of sculpture. Question Is this plaque notable to justify VI? Was does the plaque describe? --Tagooty (talk) 04:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply] :*Answer: I have adjusted the scope. This is a very old panel with a Roman text (which I cannot read). If I understand correctly, it is about regained freedom in earlier times. A topical topic at all times.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the explanation. To support this as VI, I would like to see the date of creation, transcription, etc. If it notable, there should be a mention of it in some Internet page or other publication. --Tagooty (talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your comment. I searched the internet and found something about “Graubünden unrest 1618 to 1639”. Maybe it has something to do with that, but my language skills are hopelessly inadequate to find out anything. I do think that it is an old and important panel for the churchgoers of Zernez.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral I am unable to decide for or against with available information. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added transcription using OCR to the image page. Tried Google translate Latin -> English but not very successful. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-04-21 11:29 (UTC) |
Scope:
Secale vavilovii (Secale), seeds, dried specimen |
|
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
Review it! (edit) |
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-21 12:45 (UTC)[reply] |
Scope:
Veronica Lake – studio portrait photo, circa 1952 |
Used in:
en:Veronica Lake and 16 others |
Reason:
The best and most useful portrait, see gallery. -- --Thi (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
- Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought that the image would be the best portrait for a Wikipedia article, similar to this, and the photographer and the exact date are unknown. Would "Veronica Lake – studio portrait photo, circa 1952" be a suitable scope?
Scope changed from Veronica Lake to Veronica Lake – studio portrait photo, circa 1952 --Thi (talk) 11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|