Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2022-03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Иван Табаков, 1929г.tif

I would like to request for this photograph to be restored and undeleted. It depicts my great-grandfather, as shot by his daughter. As their direct heir and thus sole owner of the rights, I allow the usage of the photograph on wikipedia with the respective licensing rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NKV55 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 26 February 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose In the first file description you said that you were the photographer. You changed that to read:

|source=Държавна Агенция Архиви
|author=Неизвестен автор
[|source= State Archives Agency]
[|author = Unknown author (translation by Google)]

Now you claim that the subject's daughter was the photographer. It looks like a formal studio portrait. In any event, given the three different stories, you should submit a request to VRT. Also note that TIFF, while permitted here, is not a good format, see Commons:File types#TIFF. Finally, note that "I allow the usage of the photograph on wikipedia" is not sufficient. Images here must be free for any use by anybody anywhere. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleted Australian Aboriginal flag images

Australian Aboriginal flag is public domain now because the Australian government has purchased the copyright from the original author.

Ox1997cow (talk) 11:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Are any of those duplicates of ones that were undeleted? I thought @Yann: said he had gone through the list, at least the ones in Category:Australian Aboriginal flag related deletion requests. Are any of the above missing from that category? Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
@Clindberg: The ones that are missing are those that have already been undeleted or decided to keep. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: 3 files restored. May be more files in Commons:Deletion requests/Australian Aboriginal flags, but the rest are SVG/PNG/GIF/JPEG duplicates. --Yann (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

More files undeleted. Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:John Nance Garner Bust.jpg

We have had discussions about the Harry Truman bust and the busts made by Jo Davidson I was curious about the other bust SIRIS is the site that was used for the other 3 request and I was curious if anyone can figure out how many of the other busts would be allowed I know ones after 89 aren't allowed but as for the rest of them every vice president from Alben Barkley to Walter Mondale minus Spiro Agnew as his was made in the 90s im not sure if these ones do once again SIRIS is what was used to figure out the other 3 Journey896 (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

What about the other busts from Alben Barkley to Walter Mondale with th exception of Spiro Agnew as I know that was made after 89 could you check for those ones?Journey896 (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 08:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Мастер спорта СССР Али Исаев на стадионе Труд, город Москва.jpg

Эта фотография не нарушает авторских прав. Я лично отсканировала ее через семейный архив. Прошу восстановить. --Арапат Курбанова (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Google translate: "This photo does not violate copyright. I personally scanned it through the family archive. Please restore."
 Info Reason for deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:IsAli.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Owning a physical or digital copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it here. The copyright is held by the actual photographer or their heirs. Only they can freely license its use here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BorovykhAI.jpg

Description Герой Социалистического Труда Андрей Иванович Боровых
Date
Source фото из семейных арховов
Author Bsn-iam

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsn-iam (talk • contribs) 19:50, 27 February 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose You claim here and in the file description that you are the author. You also say that the source is "Боровых, Андрей Иванович", "Family Archives" according to Google. In that case, the actual photographer or their heirs hold the copyright, and only they can license the image here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Renger van der Zande 2022.jpg

This a picture of racing driver Renger van der Zande, made by photographer Brian O’cleary this year. Renger has bought the rights from Brian and is free to use it on the web. Renger himself asked me to update his Wikipedia account (I work with him) with a new profiile picture and has given me permission to use the picture.

Here the WhatsApp conversation (it is in Dutch): Me-Heb jij toevallig al ergens een goede rechtenvrije foto ervoor? In de dropbox staan geen geschikte foto's Renger- Crop deze even (and the picture shot by Brian O’cleary) Me-👍🏻 Me-Weet jij wie de fotograaf is en waarom de foto rechtenvrij is? Omdat ik een nieuw wikipedia-account gebruik moet ik dit allemaal invullen voordat ik verder kan Renger-Brian O’cleary Renger- Te gebruiken ✅

--Racing456 (talk) 10:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose In order for the image to be restored here either (a) Brian O'cleary must send a free license using VRT or (b) someone else must send a license together with a copy of the written license from Brian O'cleary permitting the sender to freely license the image. Note that "royalty free" is not sufficient -- the license must make the image free to use anywhere by anybody including commercial use and derivative works. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Thewarrior1974

All pictures have been taken by members of the Isle of Man Green Party — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewarrior1974 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 28 February 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose That may be, but the copyrights are held by the various photographers and in order for the images to be restored, each of the photographers must send a free license using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Or we need a document showing that the copyrights were transfered to Isle of Man Green Party. Either case, please see COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 12:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:John R Falck 01.pdf

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: To my best understanding the draft supporting Dr Falck nomination contains only his most important work published in scientific journals that are in the public domain and not under copy right protection. I would appreciate your help in letting me know the specific item(s) in his draft the raises question(s) about copy right protection. Thanks for your help. Jmcapdevj (talk) 18:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jmcapdevj: All creative works have a copyright by default, so we need the formal written permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Template:PING

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: 这个页面没有问题，它只是一个模板的重定向，并且这个重定向是没有问题的。(My English is not good, please translate it into English.) Q28 (talk) 09:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

References

✓ Done: seems fine enough for this to be a redirect. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Reinhardhauke

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

The DRs mention this " "Glasmalerei H. Maier Neuenahr 1926" " If these windows were installed in 1926, they'd now be public domain in the US. The glassmaker does have a category in Commons: Category:Glasmalerei H. Maier (Bad Neuenahr) so it's possible these are public domain in Germany. @Rosenzweig: for their knowledge of German copyright law. Abzeronow (talk) 17:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Accd. to [1], the windows shown in the last three files are by "Glasmalerei H. Maier". But since the artist Heinrich Maier died in 1923, I'm not sure if those windows were still done by him or by some successor working for his company. I'm also unsure about File:Bachem (Ahrweiler) St.Leonardus Fenster246.JPG. That window is apparently the work of a Cologne artist named Franz Xaver Reuter. I couldn't find out when he died, he seems to have been still active in 1934. So it's possible he died no later than 1951, but I don't know. The "Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon" (AKL) online has an entry for Reuter, but no death date. --Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
The Reuter created work does seem problematic since we don't have a death date for him and 1926 is too young for PD-old-assumed. The other 3 seem like they're still possibly public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Possibly public domain, yes. But the fact that they were apparently installed in 1926, while Heinrich Maier died in 1923, makes it rather unlikely that he was the artist that did them, at least in my opinion. That leaves someone else working for his company (that apparently continued to exist after his death) as the artist, but we don't have a clue who that could have been. If we wanted to go for {{PD-old-assumed}}, that would mean 2047. --Rosenzweig τ 17:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
There have been no new posts here for 10 days. I would not restore those files because it's not clear if the works are actually in the PD in Germany. Any other opinions? --Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: per Rosenzweig. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Football Card.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Football Card.jpg

"This person played for the Green Bay Packers until 1926". If this is a 1920s card, then the copyright for it has now likely expired. If this is restored, I also request that this file be renamed so it becomes more educationally useful. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose The card shows "Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame" in the upper left. The subject was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 1977, so the card cannot be from 1926. Since he played only until 1926, the photo is likely from then, which leaves two questions -- does the card have a copyright aside from the one for the photo and, if not, when was the photo first published? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

I see. So it's more or less the same source as File:Charlie Mathys Green Bay Packers.webp which listed https://www.packers.com/history/hof/charlie-mathys as a source. Nailing down the first publication of the photograph might be tough. EDIT: I have found a 1924 team photograph that might be the source of Mathys pics here https://sports.ha.com/itm/football-collectibles/photos/1926-green-bay-packers-vintage-team-photograph-most-likely-printed-in-the-60-s-or-70-s-/a/152010-42170.s the site says that the photograph was likely printed in the 1960s or 1970s though. Also the Packers site has a high quality version of that photograph here https://100.packers.com/images/default-source/team-photos/1924-team-(green-bay-press-gazette).jpgAbzeronow. (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
I think you are correct that it is a crop from a team photo, but not that one. In the one cited above, the right side (viewer's right) of his face is completely black and the hands of the player behind him show behind his right (his right) ear. Both sides of the subject image are equally lighted and the background is players' pants with no hands in sight. Also, now that I look again, I'm inclined to think that the footballs in the Hall of Fame card have a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, I just noticed that myself. The 1923 Packers team photograph is the source of one of those Mathys photos. https://100.packers.com/images/default-source/team-photos/1923-team22c973778ca54bdebd1c610df6e17da7.jpg. I've seen a credit of that photograph to "Stiller Photo". For example this ebay listing: https://www.ebay.com/itm/362845829877 Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 Info Photographer of the 1923 photograph appears to be Otto Stiller https://greenbaypressgazette.newspapers.com/clip/48863650/green-bay-press-gazette/ who died in 1972. Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: It's been two weeks -- there's no evidence that the photo was published before 1927. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Priscila Perales 2.jpg

Priscila Perales 2.jpg

Miss Perales states in her Flickr account that she owns the rights of the photo and gives up the rights for distribution. --Forever Jose (talk) 11:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose License laundering per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Priscila Perales Nuestra Belleza México 2005.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eva-Brandeis.jpg

Ich besitze sämtliche Nutzungsrechte, habe dies soeben an Wiki Commons per Mail mitgeteilt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WaxArtAustria (talk • contribs) 09:14, 3 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose The file will be restored if and when your message is approved by a VRT volunteer. I note that you made no such claim when you uploaded the file and the source you cited does not have a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs VRT action. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Haage_europa_1975.jpg

This is a picture of a representative work of the artist Sixten Haage. It was printed by his printer, copper printer Siv Johansson and the picture was taken by her of her own approval print in her archive. I worked on her picture in photoshop so it could be used for the text on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickemikael (talk • contribs) 18:08, 3 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Sixten Haage died in 2021, may be undeleted in 2092. Thuresson (talk) 18:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Det blev alldeles för komplicerat det här. Jag får sätta mig ned med mera tid för att gå igenom och lära mig all formalia. Lite synd att det är så komplicerat men jag förstår ju varför. Jag får återkomma! Mickemikael (talk) 19:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Withdrawn by requester. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Olajumoke Adenowo - Profile Photo.jpg

The picture was taken by our media team and provided to Cartier for use on their website. The picture is of Olajumoke Adenowo and Cartier or any other organisation does not have copyright over the photo as it was not taken by them, neither is it owned by them, they simply used it on their website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allenolayiwola (talk • contribs) 17:08, 2 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Info Reason for deletion: "Marking as possible copyvio because image credited to Emmanuel Oyeleke here: https://www.ar.tum.de/aktuell/news-singleview/article/visiting-professor-olajumoke-adenowo/" Thuresson (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose In the file description, you claimed to be the photographer. Now you claim that "The picture was taken by our media team". However, the web site cited above shows it as "Photo: Emmanuel Oyeleke". It is hard to know what to believe. In order for the image to be restored the actual photographer must send a free license using VRT or someone else must send a free license together with a copy of the written license from the actual photographer which gives that person the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: needs VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TotalEnergies logo.svg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by FireDragonValo (talk • contribs) 02:23, 5 March 2022‎ (UTC)

Procedural close, no reason for undeletion. Fair use at en:File:TotalEnergies logo.svg. Thuresson (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Betonglasfenster apostelkirche duesseldorf gerresheim.jpg Wiederherstellung

Dieses Bild wurde von Wulf Köpke, dem Sohn des Glaskünstlers EO Köpke fotografiert. Ich habe es in seinem Auftrag hochgeladen. Alle Rechte an dem Bild liegen bei Wulf Köpke.

Ich bitte um die Wiederherstellung des Bildes. --Müller-Gödecke (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Das erfordert 2 Genehmigungen bzw. Bestätigungen der freien Lizenz. 2) die des Fotografen für das Foto, und 1) die des/der Erben von EO Köpke für das Foto des urheberrechtlich noch geschützten Kunstwerks von EO Köpke. --Túrelio (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
@Krd --Túrelio (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Túrelio. Permissions for original artwork and derivative photograph need to be verified. --De728631 (talk) 14:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Vice President Busts

These are bust for the vice presidential bust collection we have done this with a total for four different bust already that we thought were under copyright but after looking into it realized it wasn't here are some of the remaining ones I could find that were previously deleted also I'm gonna ask about the alben Barkley Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson busts thatwere never posted on here to begin with so could someone please check and see if these were copyrighted to begin with Journey896 (talk)

 Oppose That's not the way it works. You need to do the research and then come here and request restoration on the basis of what you found. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

I dont know what sites are reliable and this is is exactly what I did for the other ones I have no problem if you tell me what sources are reliable I would be happy to researched it Journey896 (talk)

You do as I did. Copyright registrations after 1978 are available for on line lookup at https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First. In this case, the Senate files gave the inscriptions. On most US sculpture, SIRIS will give you details. All of these will require revised descriptions when undeleted -- the author is misstated and it should be noted that the photograph is PD-US Senate, and the sculpture is PD-no notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Jim. The busts qualify for {{PD-US-1978-89}} while the photos are {{PD-USGov-Senate}}. --De728631 (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anusha Alikhan 3 - 2015.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Appears at https://wikimediafoundation.org/profile/anusha-alikhan/ with proper licensing information. I would assume that the WMF can be trusted to provide proper permission for photographs on their own website. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support As noted above, it appears there with a credit to Arash Bornak and CC BY-SA 4.0. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: per discussion. --De728631 (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Karel van de Woestijne.gif

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karel van de Woestijne.gif

"Eugene Boute, died only in 1942". Became public domain in the EU in 2013. 1901 photograph so it would be public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support Makes sense to me. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Now in the public domain in the United States and the country of origin. --De728631 (talk) 13:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coat of arms of Turkestan of the Russian Empire.svg

Please cancel the decision to delete the file. This image is currently used in projects. This is a vectorization of an element of the coat of arms of the Russian Empire in 1882. See {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support @Ellywa: It seems that you did not delete the file after closing the DR at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Turkestan of the Russian Empire.svg. However, Лобачев Владимир is right that the file is being used in various Wikipedias. De728631 (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes indeed, this one can be kept. I overlooked this one and will close the DR with keep. The other two in the same request are imho out of scope / not in use and were deleted. Ellywa (talk) 16:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Kept by Ellywa. --De728631 (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edwin Abbott Abbott.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Edwin Abbott Abbott.jpg

" The subject of the photograph (Edwin A. Abbott) died in 1926 at the age of 87. He is considerably younger than that in the photograph so it is reasonable to assume it was taken before 1900." Sounds like PD-old-assumed to me. Abzeronow (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Duplicate of File:Foto E. A. Abbott.jpg. --De728631 (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:"Pedih" by Hani Nosha Album Artwork.jpg

We have a VRT permission statement for this file per ticket:2022022710002063. Please restore. Ww2censor (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --De728631 (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Firoz Ladak.jpg

Please restore this image for review because we now have a permission statement from the photographer per Ticket:2022030410008171. Ww2censor (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --De728631 (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ángeles Amador.jpg

VRT agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021030210008318 regarding File:Ángeles Amador.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --De728631 (talk) 13:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:McQueen demo derby.jpg

Please restore this image. I got it from Pixar's main site, the creators, and should be able to use it under the creative rules since it is cited on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JalepenoPoppr (talk • contribs) 00:02, 6 March 2022‎ (UTC)

Procedural close, double request. Thuresson (talk) 04:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Leaving Me Dry COVER.jpg

Please restore this file.

The file in question is the cover of an album by musician Natalie D-Napoleon.

The image was published on the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaving_Me_Dry

The image is freely available for publication in association with promotional or biographical editorials related to the album.

--PerthMusicCat (talk) 15:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)PMC 5 March 22

 Oppose All uploads at Wikimedia Commons need to be free for anyone for any purpose including commercial reuse. Therefore we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. See COM:VRT for details. De728631 (talk) 15:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Copyrighted album cover. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Natalie_D-Napoleon_-_Album_Cover.jpg

Please restore this file - Natalie_D-Napoleon_-_Album_Cover.jpg

The image was embedded into this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Wanted_to_Be_the_Shore_But_Instead_You_Were_the_Sea

The image is the cover on an album by Natalie D-Napoleon

It is available as promotional material for the album for publication purposes in association with publicity and editorials for album.

--PerthMusicCat (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)PMC 5 March 2022

 Oppose All uploads at Wikimedia Commons need to be free for anyone for any purpose including commercial reuse. Therefore we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. See COM:VRT for details. De728631 (talk) 15:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Copyrighted album cover. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:McQueen demo derby.jpg

This is an image taken from a movie, and should be allowed for use. I got it from a public news source website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JalepenoPoppr (talk • contribs) 21:51, 5 March 2022‎ (UTC) 21:51, 5 March 2022‎

No, it would not. At least I cannot find a Creative Commons licence at https://www.pixarpost.com/. Instead the website is "© 2022 Pixar Post All rights reserved." De728631 (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Copyrighted movie image, no permission. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Filip Noterdaeme as the HoMu Director.jpg

This file is an authorised release by the copywrite owner via Flicker at my request.

The photograph was deleted because an editor incorrectly assumed that since the image in question is also available at this site: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/meet-filip-noterdaeme-leg_n_1701412 then the copywrite falls automatically to The Huffington Post.

This is incorrect, by inspection of the bottom of the right hand corner of the photograph on that website you should see "HoMu" short for Homeless Museum which is an art installation creation by Filip Noterdaeme. The photograph is copyright Filip Noterdaeme, whom I asked to upload the file to Flicker with the correct policy.

Thank you for your time in this matter.

Marvin Gauld --Marvingauld (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

  •  Oppose In such cases we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please ask Mr. Noterdaeme to verify his authorship and the free licence as explained in COM:VRT. De728631 (talk) 13:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
    I have contacted the original photographer, Daniel Isengart and requested that he email the permissions VRT term to verify the authorship as technically copyright is retained with the photographer not the art installation in this case. A ticket should be created soon. Marvingauld (talk) 14:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Once the ticket has been processed and accepted, the file will be marked for undeletion by the VRT team. Until then, all we can do is wait. De728631 (talk) 14:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Will be restored if and when VRT is received and approved. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paramount Global.svg

Logo is high resolution and it’s from the original source.

  •  Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paramount.png. The logo is complex enough to be copyrighted, so we need a permission coming from the copyright holder. The design also seems to be incorrect because Paramount Pictures still use the old out-of-copyright logo as seen at bottom of their website, while the new streaming service Paramount+ has a plus sign added to the logo shown in File:Paramount Global.svg, see here. So the file we are discussing does not seem to be in the project scope of Wikimedia Commons because it looks like it was made up by someone at logos.fandom.com. De728631 (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done Per De728631. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Man & The Angel (2022) poster.jpg

The file is free not a copyright file i have — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odlwcsu (talk • contribs)

  •  Oppose Images like this are automatically copyrighted and non-free as soon as they are created. Just because it is avaible "free of charge" at IMDB does not mean that there is no copyright. Therefore we need a permission by email from the copyright holder see COM:VRT for details. De728631 (talk) 12:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done As per De728631. Ankry (talk) 22:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Photo-sadoubah.jpg

this is my own asset, my own image https://fr-fr.facebook.com/Captainsadou https://www.instagram.com/sadoubah__/ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMNXuSS_92J2bPy5CZX9rIw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lsadout52 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 7 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Subject is a model and this photo is obviously not a selfie. Previously published at [2]. Subject's article "Sadou Bah" was deleted from French Wikipedia. Thuresson (talk) 21:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done No proof of ownership, and probably spam to boot. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paramount Global.svg

I regretted recreated the deleted content and I should have request to I delete the logo instead.

File deleted; user blocked for continual copyvios. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Takumi in Sailing Bar.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: ticket:2022022810003962 seems valid for File:Takumi in Sailing Bar.jpg. I never saw the file page, however, and I don't know what might have triggered someone to demand permission. It might make sense to keep this open for a while in case I have to ask deleting it again. whym (talk) 11:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Keeping this open per request. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. I reviewed the file page and changed where need to be changed. It can stay undeleted as far as I'm concerned. whym (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Per above. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PS Admiral DuPont.jpg

This file image is PD. See https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-148880 It was painted by J. H. Bufford in 1847.

Why are people not researching a file for for its proper license, and instead being lazy and deleting them without any imvestigation, even a cursory one?

Also what puzzles me is I received no warning of this, only a notice saying it was deleted. --Broichmore (talk) 12:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

@Broichmore: The uploader was notified on January 16, 2022. Is there any particular reason that you should receive a notice before deletion? Thuresson (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
@Thuresson: Not particularly. However the uploader in this case was likely ignorant, and did not describe the file correctly. The file is an old image, and valuable. It was in use on other websites. More time should have been left to review it. This file was not difficult to attribute correctly. The deletionist who pulled the trigger on it, was lazy or malicious or both.
Now that I have taken the extra yard to identify it, why is it still deleted. 12:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: An American work whose copyright has expired. Qualifies for PD-art, so the attribution and licence have been adjusted. --De728631 (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Her Majesty The Queen.jpg

Dear Admins or someone who deleted the photo, Yesterday I upload a photo called File:Her Majesty The Queen.jpg because I want to change the photo of the Queen on her hungarian wikipedia page. Please make back the deleting,

Yours faithfully, Amper001 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amper001 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 8 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Gettyimages: "LONDON, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 11: Queen Elizabeth II talks to guests at an evening reception for members of the Diplomatic Corps at Buckingham Palace on December 11, 2019 in London, England.(Photo by Victoria Jones - WPA Pool/Getty Images)" Thuresson (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Not a free image but copyrighted to Getty. --De728631 (talk) 16:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dratf:John R Falk.jpg

I have prepared a new version of this draft in which I have streamlined the text and substantially reduced the citations to avoid potential copy right restrictions. The original submission considered that Dr. John R. Falck scientific achievements and honors did meet the requirements needed to be included as a Wikipedia subject. Thanks Jorge Capdevila 03/09/2022Jmcapdevj (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

@Jmcapdevj: Hello. This is Wikimedia Commons where we host free media for Wikipedia and other projects. We don't have draft articles here, and as you were already told at the Wikipedia Help desk, there is en:Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13. De728631 (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural closure: Not a media file at Commons. --De728631 (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Lord Such&Such

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/PD-US-no notice files uploaded by Lord Such&Such

These are American photographs from 1926 and would have been disseminated to the public in 1926. These should now be unquestionably public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support These are all {{PD-US-expired}}. De728631 (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antu im-twitter.svg

Per [3], {{Apache}} could be used. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:50, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Atanu Chakraborty.jpg

Hi,

I am trying to add a picture to the wikipedia page of Atanu Chakraborty. Page link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atanu_Chakraborty I see that a picture has already been deleted under his name. Please let me know if I can use that picture, and if possible accept my undeletion request. --JohnnyLuxemburg (talk) 07:12, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Not done, needs permission from Pradeep Gaur. Uploader is globally blocked. Thuresson (talk) 20:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TakeHaru03 profile picture.webp

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: It is my profile picture. TakeHaru03 (talk) 07:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose OP is not a significant Wikimedia contributor. Thuresson (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support I would consider 100+ edits on enwiki significant. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
103. 32 percent of all edits is of user's own user page. Thuresson (talk) 23:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
That's 50+ non-userpage edits. Let's avoid w:WP:BITEing relatively new users. They clearly intend to become part of the community, and are not just using their userpage as a social media profile. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose I agree with Thuresson. Only one reverted eding in the main Wikipedia namespace. Everything elese is userspace/user talk related. I do not consider this significant contribution. Maybe later... Ankry (talk) 08:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: not enough support. Agree with Ankry. The edits on his user page far outnumber any other edits, suggesting that he uses WP as his social media site. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Map showing the boundaries of Eccleston Civil Parish..jpg

This map is taken from openstreetmap.

I now realise that the copyright is as follows:

Licensing This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Permission OpenStreetMap data is available under the Open Database License (details). Map tiles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license (CC-BY-SA 2.0).

I hope this helps!

24may1819 (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

 Question CC-BY-SA 2.0/ODbL licenses require attribution. Are you the author of the map from OpenstrretMap? Ankry (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: OSM has compatible license. Please update the license and attribution. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oliver Bill lg.jpg

The Picture is free use its from Website of the Legislative assembly of New Brunswick, it was taken by a photographer but the image is owned by the government. On their website it says all stuff on it is free to be used, I have included the link to the image and to the disclaimer, I am updating these pages on behave of the political party they belong to. https://www.legnb.ca/content/members/portraits/60_leg/Oliver_Bill_lg.jpg https://www.legnb.ca/en/members/current/24/oliver-bill https://www.legnb.ca/en/disclaimer

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newbrunswick1 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 11 March 2022‎ (UTC)

  •  Oppose The disclaimer at the website tells us that "Content herein may be reproduced for educational purposes, private study, research, reporting, or in order to prepare a newspaper summary, without charge or request for permission, etc." Unfortunately that is not sufficient for uploads at Commons. All uploads here need to be free for anyone for any kind of use. This includes the opportunity for general commercial reuse which is obviously not allowed per the rules of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick website. De728631 (talk) 22:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Not done, license review failed. No creative commons license at source web site. Thuresson (talk) 20:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pierson-26B.jpg

The photo (Pierson-26B.jpg) was flagged as copyright violation when it is a public-use, government-provided photo with open instructions for saving the photo right next to it. https://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/members/profile/photo/15443

--Tornado6533 (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Not done per elcobbola. State of Minnesota do not use Creative Commons licensing. Thuresson (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Joanna Semel Rose.png

This file was deleted because apparently I had not included the Source attribute. It should have been (should be) "Own".--Yorker (talk) 22:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

  •  Oppose You did declare the photo as your own work, but it can be found here without a free licence. Moreover it appears to have been cropped from a larger photo. Therefore we need a permission from the copyright holder who is usually also the original photographer. Please see COM:VRT for details. De728631 (talk) 22:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 Info The uncropped photo is available here; it is probably her husband Daniel Rose next to her. Thuresson (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artwork by Henry Dorchy

Please undelete

We have heir's permission per Ticket:2022030510003879.

However please do not restore:

They are duplicates.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done @Mussklprozz: Does the ticket specify any sort of attribution? I changed the |author= to "Henry Dorchy" and the licence tag to -heirs. However, the uploader DiaRops may need to be credited as well. De728631 (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
@De728631 Thanks a lot! And thanks also for removing the no permission-badge. Afaik, according to European copyright, the reproduction of a flat artwork does not create any additional copyright to the reproducer. – Anyway, there are about 10 photos showing the artist himself, for which the situation is different: there, the photographer has a copyright. For those once, I only added permission received. Will write back to the heir about those. – Cheers, Mussklprozz (talk) 16:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored per request. --De728631 (talk) 16:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Filip Noterdaeme as the HoMu Director.jpg

VRT agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2022030610003313 regarding File:Filip Noterdaeme as the HoMu Director.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:58, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Platyceps bholanathi.jpg

The image owner missed updating the license of the image on inaturalist after our discussion few days ago. I discussed with him today and he has updated the license now on Inaturalist. It should be good to be used in wikimedia commons now. Request review and restore the file ChanduBandi (talk) 05:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support per CC-BY 4.0 at https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/78825222 Ankry (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. Please update the license. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dit Clapper.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dit Clapper.jpg

This feels worth revisiting. If this was published in 1926, it would unquestionably be public domain in the US. Original DR suggested this was a Canadian photograph and this being pre-1946 would have definitely been PD in both Canada and the US. Abzeronow (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

See the original image here. Our upload was actually just a crop. The caption mentions the "late 1920s" so I think pre-1927 is still too early to be PD in the US. On the other hand I can't see a copyright notice either. De728631 (talk) 10:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, it's difficult to get a date on it but Getty is crediting Bruce Bennett who might have had it in his collection but definitely was not the photographer. The page does also say "Erstellt am: 1. Januar 1926" but looking at English wiki, 1927 seems a little more likely but of course 1928 and 1929 still also possible Abzeronow (talk) 01:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: unfortunately, still too many uncertainties. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logos of LOT Polish Airlines

Copied from my talk page, for further opinions and comment. This relates to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kashmiri Ellywa (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, you deleted File:LOT Polish Airlines.svg and File:LOT Polish Airlines Star Alliance.svg based on a mistaken comment of another editor. These are the official logotypes of an airline. I suggest reading COM:POLAND carefully:

Except as specified otherwise below, copyright expires 70 years from the author's death, or from the last surviving co-author's death with works of joint authorship.[1996–2016 Art.36(1)] (...)

  • For work to which copyrights are entitled by law to a person other than the author, copyright lasts 70 years from the date of being made public (...)
(underline mine)
The logos in question were copyrighted by LOT, the entity for which they had been created; not by the author. The copyright expired in 2021. The logos are free of copyright restrictions now.
This is a situation fundamentally different from a situation, for instance, where a painting has been reproduced in a publication under a licence but the work's author still retains full copyright.
I'd like to ask you to restore the logos. Thanks. — kashmīrī 00:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose I think there's some confusion here. First, on Kashmiri's line of reasoning, the copyright would have expired on 1/1/2002 -- 70 years after the 1931 publication. I don't understand where the 2021 date came from. However, even 2002 is after the URAA date (1996), so they will be under copyright in the USA until 95 years from publication -- 1/1/2027. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I had 2001 in mind, finger slip - too much typing of "2021" recently.
You missed no. 1 in the main URAA test which applies here – there is no evidence that the logo was published within the United States during the 30 days following its publication in Poland. We need evidence to claim copyright under URAA (see notes there – uncertainty re. URAA alone can't be grounds for deletion). Whereas we know that LOT Polish Airlines did not fly to the US until 1938, eight years later. See https://www.polot.net/en/the_history_of_lot_polish_airlines_part_1_1929_1939.
Summing up - there are no grounds whatsoever to claim URAA, and the logo has been free of copyright since 2002. Just nobody bothered to check.
Notes — kashmīrī 17:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
You have it backwards. In order for the URAA to apply it must not have been published within the USA within 30 days. see Commons:URAA-restored_copyrights#Preliminary_tests. Commons applies the URAA to all works unless they fail to meet the tests on the cited page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The logo may be copyrighted by PLL LOT, but not by law but by contract with its author. the logo author is Tadeusz Lucjan Gronowski who died in 1990. This means that copyright to the logo expires in 2061. The logo might be copyrighted by PLL LOT by law only if Tadeusz Gronowski was a regular employee of PLL LOT and made the logo as his regular duty. This does not seem to be this case. Note also, that Polish copyright law does not recognize work for hire. So according to my knowledge the clause you mentioned applies only to works made by regular employees as part of their duty. Ankry (talk) 23:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Turkestan coa.gif

Please restore file File:Turkestan coa.gif, which is part of the free image of the COA of the Russian Empire File:Greater coat of arms of the Russian empire.png. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: GIF duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Turkestan of the Russian Empire.svg. Not needed. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jenny en Philips Christiaan Visser (1926).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jenny en Philips Christiaan Visser (1926).jpg

This seems to qualify for an anonymous work under Netherlands law, and this being a 1926 photograph might put it out of URAA now. Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support The photo is {{PD-EU-anonymous}} and since it refers to the subjects returning from an expedition to central Asia, this appears to be a publicity photo. So we can assume that it was published in the same year making it {{PD-US-expired}} too. De728631 (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

User_talk:Herveroller

@Ankry as requested

Below is the link to where multiple 315e Regiment photos were deleted

File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 16.jpg


--Lyonsajh85 (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Herveroller

I am currently researching this regiment and therefore would be very valuable to see these photos. Therefore my question, can I have access for 24 hrs to review these photos? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyonsajh85 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 7 March 2022‎ (UTC)

@Lyonsajh85: They seem to come from this website. Daniel Durand (1888 – 1969) seems to have been the photographer. He was a serving soldier, when he took the photographs. --Broichmore (talk) 12:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
That is my website :) within the large list above, I believe there are many photos that are not from Daniel Durand and ones that I have not seen before, will he help with research and potentially put names to faces Lyonsajh85 (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Can't be undeleted before 2040, unless a proof is given that Daniel Durand is not the author. --Yann (talk) 09:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

315e Regiment pictures (File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie User talk:Herveroller)

@Ankry as requested

Below are all the deleted photos, I would like to get access to view

File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 16.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 15.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 14.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 13.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 11.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 12.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 10.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 08.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 09.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 05.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 06.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 07.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 04.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 03.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 02.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 01.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 42.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 50.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 49.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 48.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 47.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 46.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 45.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 43.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 44.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 41.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 40.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 39.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 38.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 37.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 36.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 35.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 28.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 34.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 33.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 31.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 32.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 30.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 29.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 27.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 26.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 25.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 23.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 22.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 24.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 20.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 21.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 19.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 18.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 17.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 16.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 15.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 14.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 13.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 11.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 12.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 10.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 07.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 08.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 09.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 05.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 06.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 04.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 03.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 01.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 02.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-67.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-66.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-65.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-64.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-62.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-63.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-61.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-60.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-59.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-57.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-58.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-56.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-55.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-54.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-53.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-52.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-51.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-50.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-49.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-48.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-47.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-46.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-45.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-44.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-41.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-43.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-42.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-40.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-38.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-39.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-37.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-36.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-35.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-34.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-33.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-32.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-31.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-30.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-29.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-28.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-27.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-26.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-18.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 50.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 49.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 46.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 48.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 47.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 45.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 43.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 44.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 42.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 40.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 41.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 39.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 36.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 38.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 37.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 33.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 35.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 23.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 32.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 31.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 29.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 28.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 27.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 26.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 25.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 24.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 30 (carte postale d'Epiez, route de Torgny).jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 34 (carte postale du château de Verpillières).jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 22.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 21.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 20.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 19.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 18.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 17.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 16.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 15.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 14.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 13.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 12.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 11.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 10.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 08.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 07.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 05.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 06.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 04.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 02.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 03.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 01.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 50.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 48.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 49.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 47.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 44.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 46.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 45.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 43.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 09 (Ville sur Tourbe).jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 42.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 41.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 40.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 39.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 38.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 37.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 36.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 35.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 34.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 33.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 32.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 31.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 30.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 28.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 29.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 26.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 27.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 16.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 15.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 13.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 23 (Restant du moulin de Souain).jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 11.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 12.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 10.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 09.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 06.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 08.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 07.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 05.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 04.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 03.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 02.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 01.jpg File:Portrait Auguste Nayel.JPG

Sorry, but this is not a list we can work with. A list in MediaWiki code would look like this at least:
...
Also, these are 226 files that may all need to be checked one by one. De728631 (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
@Lyonsajh85: To make this workable, I suggest you split this request into batches of ten files which we can discuss step by step. So, to start with it, I'll put up the first 10 files for undeletion now:
De728631 (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you @De728631
These are pictures from World War I with a wrong license (CC-BY-SA), no source, and wrong author (Herveroller). We need more information: where were they first published, etc. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Belly-2473 1280.jpg

Hello this file is from pixabay. but i find it on other website. you can check link from pixabay in here; https://pixabay.com/photos/belly-body-clothes-diet-female-2473/

Was it uploaded to Pixabay before 2019? See {{Pixabay}}. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support The original file was uploaded to Pixabay in 2010 [4], so the licence needs to be changed to {{Pixabay}}. De728631 (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per De728631. Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eiffel Tower in pink, Paris - Oct 1, 2021.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ordinary light of the tower shouldn't bear any copyright. If it does, many images at Category: Eiffel Tower at night should also be deleted. A1Cafel (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

While I could buy that the Tower in its default white lights probably isn't protected due to lack of creativity, anything more than that (which is definitely present here) would be creative. If we hold that the special lights are creative enough for copyright, which is being discussed at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Eiffel Tower at night - anew, then certainly a number of images in the mentioned category should go. While I lean towards such images being copyrighted simply due to Precautionary Principle, the discussion at VP/C should conclude and be considered before anything is decided here. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Not copyright in a pink light. --Yann (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

315e Regiment pictures (File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie User talk:Herveroller)

To make this workable as sugguested. Below are a batch of ten files which we can discuss step by step.

This photos are from this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Herveroller

So, to start with: File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 16.jpg

Same issue as above. No need to repeat the same answer. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antônio Rezk.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: It was probably marked incorrectly by the uploader, it should be marked with {{CC-BY-ALESP}}. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 12:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

los libros descritos y puestos en mi biografía, corresponden a mi autoría

 Not done: No filename provided. Please log in, sign, and provide a filename. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MariaPetschnig.png

Please restore this file because we now have a VRT permission for the file from the photographer per Ticket:2022031410004601. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ww2censor: . --Yann (talk) 08:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vladimir_Seixas.jpg

The image is released as Creative Commons attribution sharealike, so it can be used on Wikipedia Commons.

Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/188710573@N06/51939545741/in/dateposted-public/ Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Neepes (talk • contribs) 10:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Uploaded to Flickr 3 hours ago. Thuresson (talk) 13:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: per User:Thuresson. Looks like trying to game the system. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

vice president bust

I did some digging and found 2 more busts the catalog has no entry in for either one and on the Senate's website it states what is carved into them and none of them have any reference to any copyright I have done this with every other bust over the past couple weeks and I'm sure these are the last ones except the nixon one which also doesn't have a copyright and the ones after 1989 which include Bush Agnew Quayle and Cheney and as for those I'm not sure because they come after 89 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Journey896 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 7 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Support Both busts are not registered in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. The Lyndon B. Johnson bust does have an inscription "Jimilu Mason / copywrite 1966" [5], but that is not a valid copyright notice under US law since it lacks the © symbol. So both files qualify for {{PD-US-no notice}}. While Kalervo Kallio who crafted the Barkley bust was a Finnish artist, the country of publication would obviously be the US. De728631 (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose The © symbol is merely shorthand for the word "copyright" and either may be used. There is the question of whether the word "copywrite" is a problem, but my guess is that it is an effective notice. Carl, what do you think? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose the Lyndon B. Johnson bust. Under the guidelines of the Copyright Compendium, First Edition (which covered pre-1978 situations), it says, in section 4.2.2:
I. A misspelled or variant form of "Copyright" or "Copr." may be accepted if it is clear that copyright is meant. Examples of variants which may be accepted:
1. Copyrighted
2. Copywrite
3. Copywritten
4. Copyright Pending
5. Copyright Applied For
6. Copyright and Registered
7. Registered U.S. Copyright Office
8. Copy.
9. Copyr.
10. Cpr.
11. Corp. (if clearly not used to refer to a corporation.)
II. The equivalent of "Copyright" in a foreign language (e.g., the Spanish "derechos reservados") will not be accepted,
III. A variant of the symbol © will be acceptable only where it resembles the © closely enough to indicate clearly that the copyright symbol is meant. (The PDF has some examples of OK and not OK variants there. The @ symbol is not OK.)
So, based on that, the Lyndon B. Johnson bust above has a valid copyright notice. Being after 1964, that will expire in 2062. Registration was never required -- you had to register before you could renew, but you could even send the registration along with the renewal. It's the renewal for pre-1964 works which is required to find; the registrations can show when the copyright clock started but the lack of one doesn't necessarily mean anything, since using a notice was enough.
The Barkley bust, if it's this one, would appear to be from 1958 and does not have a copyright notice. If no registration, then it was not renewed, although it likely became PD as soon as it went on display where people could photograph it. So that one,  Support. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: One restored, as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:My Little Pony fan art - Copy.jpg

I believe this file was deleted by mistake. It's an edited version of another file that was nominated for deletion here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sexy_Rarity_on_seat.jpg The argument for deletion was that that one violated Commons:Fan art. The file I'm argued shouldn't have been deleted, ...Copy.jpg, was not actually nominated, and one of the 2 votes in favor for deleting Sexy_Rarity_on_seat.jpg supported the nomination precisely because this derivative file existed (and linked to it) - the supporter were definitely not suggesting the derivative file (...Copy.jpg) should also be deleted, which is what unfortunately happened. I made the edited copy (before the deletion request) precisely because I wasn't really sure whether or not the original might be considered to be in violation of the fan art policy. The edited version removed or changed all the unique characteristics of the original character (colors, mark on the hind leg) and was no longer identifiable as anything but a generic unicorn. (google: Rarity from My Little Pony and compare it with the deleted image) So I don't believe that the derivative could have been regarded as being in violation of the fan art policy, therefore, it should be reinstated. Thisisarealusername (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

 Weak support I do not think it can still be considered a DW of the copyrighted character. Ankry (talk) 07:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Either this is My Little Pony and therefore probably in scope, but a copyvio, or it is not, in which case it is out of scope as personal art by a non-notable artist. In either case we shouldn't restore it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose agree with Jim: either COM:DW, missing essential info and permission, or personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This unambiguously a derivative work of the "Rarity" character. Originality in copyright means, in part, the expression owes its origin to the author, a prohibition of copying. For example, exactly three diamonds on the thigh, and with the same pattern therein. The number, shape, placement, pattern, and colouring are all directly and deliberately copied (derivative) expression. The same can be said about the entire figure--why one horn, not two or none, and in four segments? Why purple hair, grey body, and blue eye makeup? Not serendipity--the the creator copied the expression of the original instead of making their own independent/novel selections. Эlcobbola talk 17:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment The picture definitely falls in scope - it's very useful for the "clop" article in English Wikipedia whether the pony in question is undeniably identifiable as a particular copyrighted character or not. Clop (and fan art in general) most definitely encompasses so-called "original characters" that are inspired by the MLP ponies, but aren't based on any particular one copyrighted character, and are drawn in all kinds of styles. So COM:WEBHOST does not apply, nor does COM:DW. As to elcobbola's comment, I wonder if you might have misunderstood which image it is I'm requesting non-deletion of, as your comment talks about details found in "Sexy_Rarity_on_seat.jpg" which were removed or changed in "My Little Pony fan art - Copy.jpg". It's the latter one I'm suggesting should be undeleted. Thisisarealusername (talk) 02:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Maybe the confusion comes from how the picture will be used? Again, it's for use in the clop] article. If you give that article a read, I believe it should be obvious this picture is indeed in scope and extremely useful in this article. Any vote saying it's not is merely uninformed. Here is information on original characters from wiktionary also: [6], where it's been an entry since 2013 with 3 quotations from books on the topic. Thisisarealusername (talk) 02:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above discussion. --Yann (talk) 09:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Ntrain197

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ntrain197

I cannot see how these are sourced but the older photographs could be public domain, and the 1926 photograph might also be public domain now (if a team photograph might have been published in the 1927 yearbook and we might still need to wait a year on that). Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

I tend to  Support this request. The photos are sourced to the Digital Collection of the University of Louisville. However, their server digital.library timed out when I tried to access the source websites, so I can't see any details yet. De728631 (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per De728631 and Abzeronow. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

HOPPER AFFICHE GENERIQUE FR 120x160 HD.jpg

I hereby affirm that I represent nWave Pictures, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work:

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Alexandre Milazzo Marketing and communication coordinator of nWave Pictures Amilazzo@nwave.com

@Biard Hippolyte: Please send the permission by email as instructed in COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roksana Rahman Poly.jpg

Hi, The above image was deleted at DR under the rationale "unused personal image" - The image in question can also be found here,
IMHO there's some scope to this image - Indeed the person isn't notable however due to the way this image was taken, the lighting, and the hat she's wearing I believe there's some scope to this image as it's not your average joe selfie, So listing here to see what other editors/admins think, Being honest I'm 50/50 so listing here,
(Discussed this with the deleting admin (P199) who was happy for me to come here), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Flickr page says it's "all rights reserved". Abzeronow (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Abzeronow, The file was imported from Flickr so it would've been under a CC licence at the time of upload Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose There's no license review, so we don't actually know what license it had at the time it was uploaded. The uploader has many copyvios. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward Ah you're right my sincere apologies - I saw the Flickr url and therefore assumed all was above board, Given both the Flickr uplloader and the Commons uploader are both called Jubair (Jubair1985) and given the upload dates being the same I would say both people are the same .... however I would assume you believe otherwise and given I'm only 50/50 with the scope of this image putting up a fight to restore may in the end just be a wasted effort, Meh it is what it is unfortunately, Thanks all for your comments anyway greatly appreciated, –Davey2010Talk 18:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: As per above discussion. –Davey2010Talk 18:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paramount1926.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ParamountLogoMaker

1926 would put it within being allowable on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD now. @Abzeronow: Could you please add a source? --Yann (talk) 08:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DCXXXL -2 Page Spread.jpg

This is image is my own creation. Please undelete. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Molivo88 (talk • contribs) 12:39, 15 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Out of scope. We don't keep personal art from artists who are not themselves notable. Also, as noted in the deletion, it appears to infringe on copyrighted characters. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 14:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Utkinportrait.jpg

Deleting this portrait was clearly not done in good faith. Nobody has claimed copyright, and its use should be considered fair. The source is here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/extra/8iaz6xit26/the-lost-tablet-and-the-secret-documents 85.229.118.40 16:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright doesn't have to be claimed, it's automatic. BBC tends to not license their works under Creative Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose as per Abzeronow. Also @85.229.118.40: , according to BBC's terms and conditions for their content, permission is required for using any images from their site. They also note that a handful of images may be copyrighted by third parties (like, for example, netizens who contributed their photos to BBC, in which copyright still belongs to the netizens). A final warning from them with regards to image / screenshot uses: We don’t own most of the photos and pictures on the BBC News site. But whoever does is often credited in the corner. This is why we won’t let you use photos and pictures from BBC News for commercial purposes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Copyright © 2022 BBC. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:File-Beijing CBD 2008-6-996735.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I think this file was speedily deleted in error. The original uploader at enwiki, CobbleCC, claimed that all of their images were their own work. They added that photography was their "lifelong hobby". Note that CobbleCc still has extant images here which for me are decent enough.

But nevertheless if the file in question is of doubtful nature, I may withdraw my UNDEL request. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done Copyvio of https://www.flickr.com/photos/charliexia/2501386136/in/album-72157621879691234/ which predates the enwiki upload. The copyright holder requested a takedown in Ticket:2014051410004247. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mary-Maxwell-1926.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mary-Maxwell-1926.jpg

The subject lived in Canada in 1926. She did make a pilgrimage to Palestine in 1926, but if this is the same photograph as en:File:Mary Maxwell (Rúhíyyih Khánum).jpg, this looks more like a outfit for a dance. A Canadian photograph from 1926 would have had its copyright expire in 1977, which was well before the URAA date of 1996 so it would be public domain in the United States. Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support Abzeronow is correct, but not for the reasons given. It's a 1926 image, so the URAA doesn't apply. It was created before 1949 in Canada, so it's PD there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support per Abzeronow. If a Canadian photo (or Israeli for that matter), the copyright expired in the country of origin before 1996, so it should have been fine in 2015 when it was deleted, if only given the right license. If published in 1926, then it's now past U.S. copyright regardless of the URAA. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Jim and Carl. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Bdl2001

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1927 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart as well as a detailed definition of "publication" for public art. Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (50 p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 p.m.a.), Mexico (100 p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties. Bdl2001 (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Where and when these pictures were first published? Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support These were published in the yearbook, The Web, see https://scholarship.richmond.edu/the-web/82/. There is no notice there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Ederporto

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Those files are not empty, corrupted or of a disallowed format. The only problem it was that the generation of the thumbnails failled. The PDFs oppened and loaded just fine, it was just the thumbnail, and as I explained in the request pages, an empty update on the file in the system fixes that. Ederporto (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Ederporto. --Yann (talk) 15:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antonio Esposito1.jpg

Il file è opera propria e si rilascia autorizzazione all'uso. --93.49.215.225 08:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose As noted in the deletion, it is taken from a copyrighted video. It can be restored here only with permission from the owners of the video's copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anshuman Tiwari (musician).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: For VTRS scrutiny Ticket#2022031710004604. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Tiven2240: There are multiple versions of this file, so not sure to which versions the ticket applies. --Yann (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Plakatbild Sandra Band001aa Only S.jpg

Hello. The manager of the singer Sandra sent this photo and asked to change it in the article. The photo is his own, Sandra herself approved this photo. Please restore.--Satabonito (talk) 13:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose When you uploaded the image, you claimed that you were the photographer. Now you say that someone else was. In order for the image to be restored, the actual photographer must send a free license using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files with copyright permission

Please restore the following files:

Permission to use information from the copyright holder (Sergey Chebotarev) is available. [Ticket#2015091210006696]. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Лобачев Владимир: . --Yann (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files with copyright permission - 3

Permission to use information from the copyright holder (Sergey Chebotarev) is available. [Ticket#2015091210006696]. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Festival Ringing Cedars 2014 June 22 Чеботарев 07.JPG is a derivative work as it mainly represents a wrt work. Please check that the permission also covers this art work. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Лобачев Владимир: . --Yann (talk) 14:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Multiple files with VRT permission

Please, undelete the following files, as they now have a VRT permission (otrs:12107884):

--TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 21:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

@Tohaomg: This doesn't seem to be a valid ticket number. Idem below. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
@Yann: no, it is a valid ticket. A link given here leads to this ticket, it may be that you just do not have permission to see it. --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 22:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
@Tohaomg: OK, but can you write down here the ticket number? Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
@Yann: Just try clicking on the link, it works for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
I can't log in this, as I am not a VRT volunteer anymore. Ticket numbers are in the format YYYYMMDDNNNNNNNN. Yann (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
@Yann: The number given above is a TicketID, which is not the canonical identifier (which would be the Ticket#) but still serves to uniquely identify the ticket. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
It is not possible to use this ticketID when adding a temporarly permission (with the "VRTS received" link), nor probably a permanent one. Yann (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
2022022110009773 --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Tohaomg: . --Yann (talk) 19:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Multiple files with VRT permission (2)

Please, undelete the following files, as they now have a VRT permission (otrs:12104557):

--TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 21:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

2022021810004793 --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Tohaomg: . --Yann (talk) 19:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Shadani Darbar is our page

Dear Sir/Madam, We cannot change history which is real and true. http://shadanidarbars.com/history

--Suraj Shadani (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose @Suraj Shadani: The copyright holder of these files needs to send a formal written permission by email. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flag of Karabunar.jpg

This file was wrongfully deleted on the grounds of copyright violation for the following reasons: - flags of cities, towns, countries, etc. are not a subject of copyright; - I am literally the creator of this flag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titaka (talk • contribs) 20:46, 18 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose This flag was created by another user who first uploaded it on January 2, 2022 and who claims copyright. Flags created by private individuals are not out of copyright according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bulgaria. Thuresson (talk) 18:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Un Long et dur chemin.jpg

Bonjour,

Etant l'unique détenteur des droits de l'image en question, et étant personnellement mandaté par l'auteur de la sculpture en question, je vous demande de restaurer cette image (File:Un Long et dur chemin.jpg).

Cordialement,--Loreno6092 (talk) 16:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

There is a ticket for this file: ticket:2021091410009785. Yann (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
It seems the permission is not complete. See [7]. Yann (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
[From the linked thread] @Loreno6092: Il faut aussi permission du photographe Philip Bernard. Vous lui l'avez demandé? –LPfi (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. File will be undeleted if and when the permission is completed. --Yann (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gidrán 4x4.jpg

I cannot decide whether you people are retarded or downright enjoying to destroy things - it is A FREE DOMAIN PICTURE, RELEASED BY THE HUNGARIAN DOD, AS I ALREADY TOLD YOU back when some of your retarded user or bot auto-marked it.

PLEASE, RESTORE IT ASAP and put a stop on your retarded bots.

Thank you,

HTKA.hu kamm (talk) 02:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Per the following information from the uploader: "This is under free domain, released by the Hungariand DoD for press use". Thuresson (talk) 08:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ASM _logo_redgold.png

Ese bot borra muchos archivos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metro fútbol (talk • contribs) 13:00, 20 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Info Google translate: "That bot deletes a lot of files". Thuresson (talk) 15:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose "Don't transfer this fair use file to Wikicommons" at fr:Fichier:Logo AS Monaco FC - 2021.svg. Thuresson (talk) 15:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. No reason provided. --Yann (talk) 18:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Painting by Michał Jan Borucki

VRT agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2022031810006664 regarding File:"Desire", 2017, Michał Jan Borucki, Oil on canvas, Triptych, 40x120cm.jpg, File:Michał Jan Borucki at vernissage in Studio Flesz, Warsaw 2017.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: . --Yann (talk) 06:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ścieżka widokowa6.JPG

This photos and other photos signed by Silia Jankowska was made for my mother! But She did not used computer ! She made photos but i wrote article to wikipedia. And She give me permission to used her photos in my article ! She was very proud that her photos will be in internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysismok (talk • contribs) 00:12, 20 March 2022‎ (UTC)

The same photos from my mother! She gave me permission to publish her photos I ask of the all phots sign Silia Jankowska! I AM Marta Jankowska her dother and i only help her to publish in internet becose he is to old to publish self. We was both in Leśny Park in Ustroń but my mom made pictures and i wrote tekst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysismok (talk • contribs) 00:22, 20 March 2022‎ (UTC)

@Mysismok: Silia Jankowska can write the permission on paper. Then you can scan this and send the permission following the instructions at COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Yann. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Light Picture.jpg

this was failure he will add the license — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustJamesHere (talk • contribs) 18:25, 20 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose This photo already has a license. This photo was deleted for the following reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AndLikeThings. Thuresson (talk) 20:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Regulars - Profile Pic.jpg

This image is in the public domain publicly representing the musical, as found on their Facebook, Instagram and Twitter pages:

www.facebook.com/regularsmusical www.instagram.com/regularsmusical www.twitter.com/regularsmusical— Preceding unsigned comment added by JanisMitchell (talk • contribs)

Where do you see evidence that this is Public domain? Clicking on the Facebook profile image explicitely states "© 2021 by The Jade/Anthony Company. All rights reserved." I couldn't find any evidence to the contrary behind either of the links provided above. Victor Schmidt (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Victor! Thank you so much for your response. If this is the image they use to represent their musical, how then do we display that here on Wikipedia, as with Waitress (musical) or Dear Evan Hansen? JanisMitchell (talk) 04:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I am afriad that this is most likely a case of you don't. Wikimedia Commons only accepts files which are either evidently freely licensed or evidently public domain. While some Wikimedia Projects, including allow certain copyrighted images under the US "fair use" doctrine, Wikimedia Commons does not. However, I am relatively convinced that this image wouldn't be accpted on the english Wikipedia either, as both Waitress (musical) as well as w:en:Dear Evan Hansen already have other non-free images (WP:NFCCP#3 and a logo of the creator (?) wouldn't particularely enhance the articles in question. The only case where I could imagine such a image to be used would be an article about w:en:The Regulars, which doesn't appear to exist yet. Also, you still haven't answered my question of where you see that this is PD as claimed when you made the undeletion request. Victor Schmidt (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for explaining this. And my apologies, Victor, I misspoke assuming it was public domain because they'd shared it to their social media platforms -- failing to realise they'd posted it with a copyright notice.

However, regarding an article for the file, I originally tagged it with the one I was creating when I uploaded the file, but it was removed from the article when the image was deleted. JanisMitchell (talk) 02:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Taemin in photo teaser of collaboration between Korean Air and SuperM.jpg

I believe i have right to use this photo as a profile photo of Taemin. I gave credits as owner is Korean Air.

@Forshinee: Commons only accepts free content, so no, you don't have the right to use this photo on Commons. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Okay so how does everyone else have right to use photos? Like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Taemin_at_a_showcase_in_Taiwan,_in_May_2016_03.jpg
how is this not copyrighted then?
How is Doja Cat photo not copyrighted...
I do have right, its just that y'all instead of explaining that i should have tag image under xxx would rather take everything down its ridiculous Forshinee (talk) 13:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
@Forshinee: That file was uploaded on Flickr by the copyright holder under a free license. Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission following the procedure at COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Taemin in photo teaser of collaboration between Korean Air and SuperM.jpg

I believe i have right to use it with fair use.

I gave credits to owner Korean AIR and i do strongly believe they gave nothing against uploading photos

@Forshinee: Commons doesn't accept fair use. Yann (talk) 12:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:"Press It" Showcase, February 2016.jpg

I strongly believe and I'm sure the owner of the photo doesn't mind using it here on wikipedia. I don't see a legal problem with using it with Fair Use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forshinee (talk • contribs) 12:19, 21 March 2022‎ (UTC)

@Forshinee: Commons doesn't accept fair use. Yann (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose Images on Commons and Wikipedia must be free for any use anywhere by anybody. That means that the actual copyright holder must give a written license. Fair use is acceptable in some cases on Wikipedia but never on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: No fair use on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:El bosque animado.jpg

Hello.

Please, undelete this file, as it is the real poster of the film.

Thanks in advance and king regards.

 Oppose @Jorbus1984: Commons only accepts free content. You are not allowed to upload this file without a formal written permission from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the instructions. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Agreed. It is a copyrighted movie poster. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:James McTaggart.jpg

Please restore this file for review now that we have a permission ticket. Ticket: 2022032110005042 Ww2censor (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ww2censor: . --Yann (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:"In the Wind", 1961 - NARA - 558854.jpg

This image is the .jpg file of File:"In the Wind", 1961 - NARA - 558854.tif, an image in Category:NARA TIF images with categorized JPGs by an unknown artist provided by the Harmon Collection. It was deleted per request: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Peter Clarke (artist) . I do not know about the other images deleted per this request; with TiFF files deleted there is no way to track.

Thank you, Krok6kola (talk) 19:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose South African Peter Clarke is an internationally renowned artist who is not known to ever have been a US federal employee. Thuresson (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done No valid reason for undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:190503 National Academy Dinner 006 copy 2.jpg

The image in question, File:190503 National Academy Dinner 006 copy 2.jpg, was deleted from the page, Eckard Wimmer. The image is the property of Eckard Wimmer and is owned by him. The image can be verified if requested. Please let me know what the problem was or still is so this issue can be resolved.

--Tyler5591 (talk) 04:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

@Tyler5591: The copyright holder must send a formal written permission following the procedure at COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 10:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:To work is to lose my life 2021-07-15.png

This file is a rough imitation of the screenshot of Japanese TV program in 2004, not the screenshot itself. (This image is essential to explain this famous Japanese internet meme.) This is a kind of portrait, so is not copyright violation, I think. -- Asanagi (talk) 11:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose If it is a close enough imitation to be useful for the purpose stated, then it is a copyright violation. If it is not that close, then it is out of scope. Either way we shouldn't restore it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Commons:Deletion requests/File:To work is to lose my life 2021-07-15.png. If it's not a clear-cut copyright violation, then speedy does not apply. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Prof-Anupam-Sibal.jpg

Hi,

I hereby affirm that I have the right to use this image. Please proceed with the undeletion process.

--Rahul2309 (talk) 12:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Rahul Dubey - 22nd March, 2022

 Oppose The file name is File:Prof-Anupam -Sibal.jpg. The copyright holder must send a formal written permission following the procedure at COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 13:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 14:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo sct lubricants.png

Logo is below COM:TOO IMHO. --Leyo 12:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per De728631. @Leyo: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Prof. Maria Elena Teresa Speroni.jpg

Solicito la recuperación del archivo

Prof. Maria Elena Teresa Speroni.jpg.


es una foto tomada por mi hace muchos años y editada recientemente en tono sepia No esta tomada de ningun archivo externo--Alejandro246 (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

User has re-uploaded the image with a proper explanation of its provenance, and it is currently not tagged for deletion. I have restored the history of the image for continuity. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KMB RT8315 34.jpg

That is my own work, please check for the history. Please help adding back CC BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL templates if necessary. Sanmosa Outdia 14:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: No apparent issue. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TK Hannover Luchse.jpg

Das Logo wurde 2021 von mir persönlich für die TK Hannover Luchse erstellt. https://www.schulzdesign.info/ueber-uns/news/tkh-erhaelt-neues-corporate-design-von-unserer-werbeagentur

Ich möchte Sie herzlich bitten, die Datei wiederherzustellen. Vielen Dank.

 Oppose In solchen Fällen benötigen wir eine Freigabe per E-Mail. Siehe dazu bitte COM:VRT/de. De728631 (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: No trivial logo. VRTS permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Universalist Church (Edward Hopper, 1926).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

The copyright on these could have expired. @Clindberg: Abzeronow (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: per request. Ruthven (msg) 12:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Breviceps Macrops.jpeg

Hello, I'm requesting for the file "Breviceps Macrops.jpeg" to be undeleted. I read it had been deleted because of it's license but found it under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) license. I hereby ask if this file could be undeleted so the article "Breviceps Macrops" can have a picture of the animal. Bacon Kdjie (talk) 15:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Эlcobbola. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SHINGLE1944.jpg

This is the poster of my movie-- Wikipimdb (talk) 16:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Pierfrancesco Fiorenza

 Not done: as per Эlcobbola. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DAKAYAK КИЇВ.jpg

Файл:DAKAYAK КИЇВ.png

Я є автором даної фотографії. Ось підтвердження, що я власником сторінки на Facebook: [URL=https://savepice.ru][IMG]https://cdn1.savepice.ru/uploads/2022/3/22/dd4168743947a678a8af5a260e814c32-full.png[/IMG][/URL] [URL=https://savepice.ru/]загрузить фото[/URL]

Sукес, 22.03.2022 --DAKAYAK (talk) 17:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

I am the author of the band DAKAYAK. Here Facebook: https://ibb.co/7y0Jx34 Complaint: https://ibb.co/nsFr93F --DAKAYAK (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose The file name is File:DAKAYAK КИЇВ.png. The copyright holder must send a formal written permission following the procedure at COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 19:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Newspaper clippings

QaswabdGallery is authorized representative for those information of newspapers form Hasan Morshed son of Artist Qamrul Hasan Qalon (1949-2003). Please restore those files for review now that I have all permission tickets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qaswabdgallery (talk • contribs) 19:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

@Qaswabdgallery: You must wait for a VRT volunteer to process these tickets. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
See also VRT noticeboard. Yann (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Busto quieti1.jpg

E' stato un mio errore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.254.147.243 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 23 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Info Google translate: "It was my mistake.". Thuresson (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: not a valid reason to undel. Ruthven (msg) 12:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ledi Europa 1995.jpg

--Pchiolik (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC) Ciao, il file File:Ledi Europa 1995.jpg non viola alcun copyright, perché il citato canale Youtube è gestito da me personalmente e il video pure, praticamente ho fatto lo screen dal mio stesso video.
spero che la foto sarà riammessa in wiki :) --Pchiolik (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Deleted as Screenshot of non-free Youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=248mUB4368Q Yann (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: @Pchiolik Puoi pubblicare il video unicamente se ne detieni i diritti d'autore, cioè se hai effettuato tu la ripresa, altrimenti è "license washing", come diciamo qui e in Italia è un reato. Detto ciò, puoi iniziare col cambiare la licenza al video, mettendolo sotto licenza libera Creative Commons. Poi se ne riparla. Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tulip Olsen.png

The file has been deleted by 2001:4455:364:A800:C40A:EA8A:67BA:2C96 as a ridiculous reason of "zero real world notability". Wiki is a free place for editing and spreading knowledge. Please undelete the file for more accurate information.

✓ Done: w:File:Tulip Olsen.png. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lake MT.png

The file was deleted along the page, whoever deleted it has a ridiculous reason of "Not nearly enough non in-universe coverage to show it passes notability". Wiki should be open to all kinds of accurate information, regardless of coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runningman2027 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 24 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Info @Runningman2027: No file with this file name has been deleted from Wikicommons. Deleted from English Wikipedia on March 21, 2022. Thuresson (talk) 11:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to do here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Asintomaticxs logo.jpg

No creo que deba ser borrado porque no irrumpe ninguna norma de derechos de autor

 Oppose Complex logo. We need the formal written permission from the copyright holder. Yann (talk) 14:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Europiene Flagge EIZ Rostock.png

The image has been deleted for copyright reason although I own the copyright for it.--EIZRostock (talk) 13:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh, it seems that such things happen on more than one contributors. Sanmosa Outdia 14:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose Published outside Commons before being uploaded here. We need the formal written permission from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kwai Shing West Estate Lift No.5.jpeg

That is my own work, please check for the history. Please help adding back CC BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL templates if necessary. Sanmosa Outdia 14:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

@Sanmosa: Why is this so small? Could you please upload the original picture with EXIF data? Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
@Yann: Consider the fact that the picture is taken in years ago, I do not think that it is possible for me to find out the original picture (but I may try). So there was no EXIF data for the deleted picture? Sanmosa Outdia 23:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support I've looked through the user's history of uploads (i.e. see the deletion notices on their talk page), and after reviewing all the evidence, I think they are trustworthy enough to give them the benefit of the doubt for a low-res image without EXIF which cannot be found online. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per King of Hearts. --Yann (talk) 08:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ASDT_Logo.jpg

I cannot use the original file in ASDT German Wikipedia, thats why I had to reupload the file so it can be used. -GilsonAlv-GilsonAlv (talk) 04:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC) -24/2/2022-GilsonAlv (talk) 04:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose You took this fair use image from de:Datei:ASDT Logo.jpg and then added a Creative Commons license without just cause. Thuresson (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 08:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Simran Choudhary in a Lehenga.jpg

My picture which I clicked titled 'Simran Choudhary in a Lehenga.jpg' and uploaded on Wiki Commons has been deleted by an idiot on Wikipedia claiming copyright violation.

https://500px.com/photo/1043999104

Here is the original picture and I'm the sole owner of it. Kindly undelete my picture and restore it.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilaruness (talk • contribs) 23:18, 24 March 2022‎ (UTC)

✓ Done: by King of Hearts. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daneshmand Magazine Cover March 19th, 2021.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2022031110000422. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: . --Yann (talk) 10:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by KNM-CULTURE

My personal view is these two images (scanned version of a certificate) could be tagged as {{PD-ineligible}}, the design of these certificates is quite simple and does not meet the threshold of originality. Signatures on both images also applies such rule, as in Germany and Netherlands, signatures are comparable to simple graphics that just fulfill some practical purpose which are likewise not eligible for copyright. Stang★ 17:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion and the question raised, as a new editor, I would like to ask. I uploaded these two competition certificates for the new character article as a proof of the competition award experience, and this certificate proves that the source is from the award granted by the person who won the award. But if this is not a valid certificate, what should I use for a proof of award for the new entry in the article? For example, replace it with a reference to the winner's name on the official website? KNM-CULTURE (talk) 16:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
@KNM-CULTURE: Putting my Wikipedia editor hat on, competition certificates are considered primary sources, and generally cannot be used as evidence that someone won an award. And if a source is considered reliable, then it doesn't even matter whether it is easily accessible online or not (e.g. a paper book in an old library). That said, I have no objections to restoration over copyright reasons, so it's up to you whether you still want them restored even though I doubt it is the panacea you may think it is. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks to my predecessor with the beautiful Wikipedia Editor hat, I've given up using certificates as proof. I simply replaced it with a more convenient link to the official list of winners. Thank you again for your answers. KNM-CULTURE (talk) 08:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done No longer required for the stated purpose. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Masked Singer Belgium.png

The logo of the Belgian series is unique for this series and freely licensed. It can be checked at https://www.themaskedsinger.be/ Other pages of international versions of The Masked Singer also show their own respective logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmartGwen (talk • contribs) 08:01, 24 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose There is no free license or other mention of copyright on the cited page. The web site's terms and conditions grant a license that is far too limited for our use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chanel black dress 1926.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chanel black dress 1926.jpg

If this was published in the US version of Vogue in 1926, copyright on this would have expired. If the French version of Vogue, we might need more info. Abzeronow (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Comment I'm not sure it's in scope it's only 156x317 and fuzzy -- not very useful. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, that sounds too small and low quality to be useful. I guess we can just keep this one deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nikos Kypourgos.jpg

Dear Editors,

I would like to ask you to restore the deleted (File:Nikos Kypourgos.jpg) photo, as although it is not my creation, the photographer (Olympia Krasagaki) has given me the rights to use and post it on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. I am at your disposal for any clarification regarding the rights of this photo.

Yours sincerely, Nikos Kypourgos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikoskypourgos (talk • contribs) 20:57, 24 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose In order for the file to be restored, Olympia Krasagaki must send a free license using VRT. Note also that "rights to use and post it on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS" is insufficient. Files here must be free for use anywhere by anybody for any purpose. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Physiographic Regions of Maryland.png

@Fastily: deleted "file:Physiographic Regions of Maryland.png" on 2012-04-04 for "no permission since 15 March 2012" but "wikipedia:en:file:MDGeoReg.PNG" is specifically listed on English Wikipedia by @Jlevy: as being in the public domain and eligible for Wikimedia Commons: "This is a map of Maryland's physiographic provinces produced by the Maryland Geological Survey in 2001 and supplied in a public-domain report relating to Baltimore's rail system pursuant to Congressional mandate in 2005." (@Stefan4: ) Nicole Sharp (talk) 05:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Why would content produced by Maryland Geological Survey be public domain? Its web site has a copyright symbol. Thuresson (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose Agreed. Works by the Maryland government are copyrighted. © 2022 Maryland.gov. All rights reserved. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Works by the Maryland State government are no exempt from copyright. --De728631 (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Collins Pro Line Fusion.jpg

This picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Collins_Pro_Line_Fusion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 was taken originally by me on behalf of Atlas/Augsburg Air Service to contribute to a) their website (King Air Description) and b) Wikipedia (King Air article (German) for common understanding. From what I can see it was removed. I would like to see it back if any possible. I have sent the written permission for this and other images to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Kind regards, Andreas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Universe59 (talk • contribs) 08:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

 Support Said to be copied from [8], but this is not the source. Our copy is bigger. Yann (talk) 08:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Yann. The upload at Commons appears to be the original. --De728631 (talk) 15:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Printed Shirts.jpg

Hi,

Please kindly undo the deletion of my image which is not any part of promotional or anything to violate in wikimedia. Kindly please recheck and undo the deletion.

Thanks In advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.207.195.178 (talk • contribs) 08:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

@Uathayam: Copied from the Internet, so we need a permission from the copyright holder for a free license. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done per Yann. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:James Mace handwriting 1993.jpg

This is the draft of the speech to show how the handwriting of the James Mace looked like. Draft itself belongs to the academic library and not to the private collection. Downloaded to illustrate the uk:w:Джеймс Мейс when working to meet the good article criteria. This is not a complete work and it does not contain some original information as most of Mace's works are published and his ideas are widely known.--Anntinomy (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Copyrighted letter. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Abhishek Bhalerao.jpg

Please do not delete the File:Abhishek Bhalerao.jpg it is the photo of actor Abhishek Bhalerao. He is well known actor with acting work in Indian Films , Webseries, Advertisements and Tv Shows. --Mumbaiactor (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Mumbaiactor: Are you Abhishek Bhalerao? Yann (talk) 15:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 Comment I think Abhishek Bhalerao meets our notability standard, see IMDB. However, Yann's question is on target. This doesn't look like a selfie, so if the uploader is the subject, it is not Own Work as claimed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
IMO it is the opposite: it is a selfie, but Mumbaiactor talks about Abhishek Bhalerao in the third person, so I doubt he is Abhishek Bhalerao. The result is the same: we need the permission from the photographer. Yann (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: No evidence that the uploader is also the original photographer. Permission from the copyright holder is required (see COM:VRT). --De728631 (talk) 15:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pintura-de-Evo-en-el-Museo-de-Orinoca.jpg

La imagen no viola derechos de autor --Hilaya45 (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose As noted above, all of these are copyright violations. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. All of these are copyrighted and non-free. --De728631 (talk) 14:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Artista emer.jpg

dB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed-Bar Music (talk • contribs) 19:44, 25 March 2022‎ (UTC)

Procedural close, no reason for undeletion. Thuresson (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:07 Portrait.jpg

We have permission per Ticket:2022032610003348, but I have no information about the subject of the image. If the image's subject does not speak against: can it please be restored? On the other hand, if there is an obstacle, can I please be told wherein it exists, and what the subject of the image is, so I can write back to the client? Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 12:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The file description reads "Dorothee Ziegler, s/w-Fotografie, um 1980". The image is a scan of a grainy B&W portrait of a woman who looks to be around 30. Google turns up several people with that name, but none of them is particularly notable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

 Info The subject is de:Dorothee Ziegler. The photographer is Christian Günther, named here. Thuresson (talk) 13:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
@Thuresson @Jameslwoodward Well, the permission comes from the photographer himself, so I see no reason not to restore the image. Mussklprozz (talk) 13:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support I withdraw my comment about notability, see Dorothee_Ziegler. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: and renamed. @Mussklprozz: . --Yann (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stacks-image-4ada20f-560x680.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2022032110010321. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: and renamed. @Mussklprozz: . --Yann (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files with copyright permission - 2

Permission to use information from the copyright holder (Sergey Chebotarev) is available. [Ticket#2015091210006696]. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

 Comment VRT agent (verify): Note that none of these files are included in that ticket. The user was informed of this situation here and here. However, please verify if the deleted files include another ticket number. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ganímedes. --Yann (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:'Across the Harbor, Provincetown' by Harry Aiken Vincent.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Previous Undeletion discussion: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-12#Paintings_by_artists_who_have_been_dead_for_more_than_70_years

For the first file, I essentially agree with this conclusion "there's no reason to think that this work by an artist well-published in his life was not published." I would posit that it's likely it was published very close to 1926, and since 1926 works are now public domain in the US, it's worth taking another look at undeletion of the Maynard Dixon file.

As for the second, Alamy says it's public domain. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-across-the-harbor-provincetown-by-harry-aiken-vincent-137440613.html That's good enough for me as far as evidence that it was published before 1927. @Wmpearl: , @Prosfilaes: , @Taivo: , @Jameslwoodward: , @Green Giant: since they were interested parties in previous discussions. Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

For Across the Harbor, we have now evidence, that the painting is in PD, and I  Support restoring it. Taivo (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support I'm not completely comfortable relying on Alamy, but there doesn't appear to be a copyright notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Taivo and Jim. --Yann (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:McQueen Kelly-2020-027.jpg

This file was previously deleted from Dr. Kelly McQueen's Wikipedia page, yet I have received a formal letter granting rights from the photographer to editor of the page (Kenia Servin) to use as needed. I have attached the letter below as well.

File:PhotoRelease-ToddBrown-UWMadison.pdf


--Kservin (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Kenia Servin [Date Signed: 03/25/2022]

@Kservin: But from where does the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-4.0 license come? Thuresson (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose The license in the letter is very limited, "I hereby grant permission to Dr. Kelly McQueen, Marie Hendricks and Kenia Servin to reproduce any portion of the photo images that have been taken by me Todd Brown for the purpose of self-use and/or self-promotion".
That fails our requirements on two different grounds. First, it grants permission to only three people to reproduce the images. It does not give them the right to license the images more widely. Second, the purposes for which they may use the images are limited to "self-use and/or self-promotion". Commons images must be freely licensed for use by any person anywhere for any purpose. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Federico Gutiérrez.jpg

Hi

Our agency take the picture and published it. We have the permissions to do it and let the photo with CC.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jotadyepes (talk • contribs) 11:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

@Jotadyepes: Since it is copied from Facebook, the copyright holder must send a formal written permission. Alternatively, upload the original image with full EXIF data. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 12:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sundar pichai.png

This is a capture from this World Economic Forum YouTube video which is licensed under CC BY 3.0. Heartfox (talk) 04:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

 Support That appears to be correct. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Extracted from a freely licensed YouTube video. --De728631 (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marigold Gardens, Chicago, 03.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marigold Gardens, Chicago, 03.jpg

"1923 US work." I overlooked this one when I made a request to undelete similar ones a few years ago. Abzeronow (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Now in the public domain in the country of origin. --De728631 (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:מתחם קבר הרשבי.jpg

מתחם קבר הרשבי.jpg is a photo published in the Israeli Official Gazette #9189. The photo is {{PD-IsraelGov}}, that is, not subject to copyright protection under the Israeli Copyright Law. It is currently used by Israeli Special Authority Regulations for Combating the New Coronavirus (Temporary Provision) (Restriction on Activities and Further Instructions). See similar discussion over File:אזור מירון.jpg. The photo is part of the Israeli Law and I request it to be restored ASAP. – Fuzzy – 14:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zeilen Door De Grote Storm.jpg

I do not know why some of the 'editors' here decide to delete this image on a 'copy right' excuses, this image is from my own personal archive, I have the rights of this image... p.s. in other case, they also decided to delete an image from the Tropenmuseum (a well known museum, and it's in their collection!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hendricolucky (talk • contribs) 15:08, 27 March 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/Works by Willem van der Does. Thuresson (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose Please note that owning a physical copy of a painting or even the original painting itself does not automatically make you own its copyright too. Copyright usually rests with the original artist. Even though Willem van der Does died some time ago, his works are still protected for a period of 70 years after his death, and only his heirs may grant a permission to upload any such photos under a free licence. De728631 (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antoine Bechara.jpg

The photo of the file [Antoine_Bechara.jpg] was deleted because I had no permission. Here I am requesting a permission and asking for the undeletion of this file.

I hereby affirm that I am the exclusive copyright holder of the photo used here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Antoine_Bechara.jpg and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. This photo was taken for me by a colleague from my camera.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Antoine Bechara

Copyright Holder

03/27/2022

✓ Done by a VRT volunteer par VRTS ticket. Nothing to do here. Ankry (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rose des vents à Toulouse Blagnac.jpg

File was deleted without discussion and without waiting time. A previsous discussion concluded the file was acceptable (French gvt open license Etalab). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_licence_(French) --Desman31 (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ancient civilizations of Mexico and Central America (IA anc03spin).pdf

This was laughably egregious. There is no copyright notice; therefore, the work is in the public domain in the U.S. (see PD-US-no notice). There is no need to check for a renewal, but, doing so anyway, there was no renewal. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done per abobe. No notice indeed. Ankry (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Raid shadow legends.jpg

Hi, this is the logo of the game from Plarium. Here is the link to the game page: https://plarium.com/en/game/raid-shadow-legends/

Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.plarium.raidlegends

Apple Store: https://apps.apple.com/app/id1371565796

Microsoft Store: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/raid-shadow-legends/9p1vwdpc7fnq


The file was deleted from Wikipedia with the reason that it is a game cover art.

I would like to ask to recondsider this decision and undelete the file, since this is the logo of the game.

Best regards, --Moshikstein (talk) 08:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not: copyright violation. --Yann (talk) 09:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Szent Lukács Fürdő - 1901 körül (1).tif

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

These three files with unknown authors are old enough to be PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

 Info The first photo is from here. Published in Italy in 1903. While a bit too fresh for PD-old-assumed, it may likely be {{PD-Italy}} or {{PD-anon-expired}}. Ankry (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: File:Leeuwenburg1900.JPG is a color picture, and it is so small that the information on the card can't be read. --Yann (talk) 08:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2022-03&oldid=645431701"