Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2007-12
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Undelete Image:Ubaidi Zokoni.jpg[edit]
Please undelete this Image:Ubaidi Zokoni.jpg and other similar photos that are listed in my talk page. The author of these works are clearly indicated. And one more photo Image:Nasimi_isfara.JPG do not delete it, please. It was taken by me and is not copyrighted. --Ibrahimjon 18:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- You specified "Artist: Immodinova C." on the image page. You yourself give your name as "Ibrahimjon Rustamov" on your user page. You licensed the images as {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}}. We need permission from the artist. Lupo 18:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- What I made wrong mentioning artist's name? Some folks even said that I mentioned my name as an artist. These pictures are everywhere in Tajikistan. People even make posters out of it, teachers are encouraged to print them out to use in teaching. I am trying every efforts to find out and meet with Immodinova but not successful.
- I wonder if there is a license that could such kind of images that could be deleted if required by their authors.
- It is really to disappointing to see how bots mess up my talk page with warnings, even for those images that are my own. Consider how maybe difficult for people in countries where uploading media is too consuming and not spending hours to write comments for every warning spams that bots generate.--Ibrahimjon 12:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- If you are not artist and the artist did not create the work as a work for hire for you, then you are not the copyright holder as you claimed by using {{Self}} and you may not issue any licences to the work. The fact that a work is widely distributed does not mean that it is not protected by copyright, and no, we can't violate copyright laws and just wait for copyright holders to complain about it.
- You have only had two bot messages posted to your user talk page (the rest were left by other users). Both were appropriate messages, because you had failed to provide valid source and licensing information as instructed by Commons:First steps, Commons:Licensing and during the upload process. Please do read those texts. Instead of dismissing those warnings as "spam" (which they are not), you should heed them. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This category was deleted on 21:24, 24 November 2006 for the reason: empty, unused category; redundant to Guangzhou Metro. This is not a valid reason and the deletion of correct categories (see Guangzhou Metro) is contrary to Commons policy.
Category:Guangzhou Metro is necessary to classification operations, so I request its undeletion. --Juiced lemon 16:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Proyecto Ceibal's logo[edit]
The image Image:Logotipo_ceibal_baja.jpg is a logotype and has no copyright restrictions. Ceibal is a governamental project. The logo is also available in the official site: http://www.ceibal.edu.uy/
Could you please undelete it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.125.49.198 (talk • contribs) at 11:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- That image was deleted 01:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC) by D-Kuru (talk | contribs) for being a logo. Was it the logo in the top left corner of CEIBAL at http://www.ceibal.edu.uy/? If so, I see no evidence of that logo being free, and the upload log shows no evidence of date, author, or permission. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, that was this logo. Someone with knowledge in intellectual property in Uruguay to close this request? — Xavier, 11:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think we should deny this request. Uruguayan copyright law states that works by the government are "perpetually protected," not released into the public domain. --Boricuæddie 00:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, that was this logo. Someone with knowledge in intellectual property in Uruguay to close this request? — Xavier, 11:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This category was deleted on 14:57, 22 August 2007 without declared reason, then recreated on 18:39, 8 November 2007.
As this category is currently normally used, I request the restoration of the history of Category:Lubusz Voivodeship. --Juiced lemon 14:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
This category was deleted on 14:56, 22 August 2007 without declared reason, then recreated on 15:17, 16 October 2007.
As this category is currently normally used, I request the restoration of the history of Category:Podlachian Voivodeship. --Juiced lemon 14:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
This category was deleted on 14:54, 22 August 2007 without declared reason, then recreated on 15:17, 16 October 2007.
As this category is currently normally used, I request the restoration of the history of Category:Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship. --Juiced lemon 14:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
This category was deleted on 14:54, 22 August 2007 without declared reason, then recreated on 15:14, 16 October 2007.
As this category is currently normally used, I request the restoration of the history of Category:Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship. --Juiced lemon 14:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
This category was deleted on 14:55, 22 August 2007 without declared reason, that is contrary to Commons policy.
As the name of this category matches currently the title of the English Wikipedia article Subcarpathian Voivodeship, I request the restoration of Category:Subcarpathian Voivodeship.
This don't presume the future use of the category (redirection or destination for the content of Category:Podkarpacie Voivodeship). --Juiced lemon 15:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Done. All have been restored : apparently no misspelling and their name follows Commons guidelines (i.e. is in English and matches en.WP). For the sake of honesty, in addition or instead of "without declared reason" (which is true), I'd have liked that you mentioned that those categories had been deleted as part of an edit war. Whatever spelling is preferred, they should not have been deleted though. — Xavier, 18:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was unsure that “edit war” was the appropriate term, and I felt it was not necessary to talk about it, since I had given sufficient reasons for the undeletion. --Juiced lemon 20:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
All have been recreated or undeleted. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 03:23, 05 December 2007 (GMT)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Crossways Academy[edit]
Please can you explain the deletion of this article
- Wikimedia Commons doesn't host articles just images, sound clips, videos, that sort of stuff; for articles, you'll want Wikipedia. Hope this helps. You might try and ask an administrator to undelete the content for you temporarily so you can copy the content to the relevant language edition of the Wikipedia side of the project. Nick 19:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Was out of project scope; still is. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 03:21, 05 December 2007 (GMT)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image:Greystitle.jpg was deleted with the comment that the title is copyrighted. Titles cannot be copyrighted; otherwise, companies would have the ability to prevent people from using the titles of their works. Titles can only be trademarked, and to the best of my knowledge, I remember that being noted in the template being used on the image page. 17Drew 09:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Done this should not have been deleted without a discussion. I hope the deleting admin didn't mean to say that the title's text is copyrighted, but in any case I think that the layout is ineligible as well. --rimshottalk 10:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- and re-deleted. This image is not a free image. It's not eligible for hosting on Commons. Please don't undelete without discussion. Cary Bass demandez 16:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I've undeleted again. This image is not free, because I think all users, including new administrators should understand a bit better why images like these are not free for upload. Cary Bass demandez 16:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- It is correct to say that the title itself -- "Grey's Anatomy" -- is not copyrighted. This image of the title, however, is both copyrightable and very likely registered as a trademark as well. (Hollywood is obsessive about such things.) I'd remove it. MikeGodwin 18:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Mike, how far would we go with removal of items, is this a problem something like Image:Beatles_logo.png would face too, or is that image sufficiently "free" to be actively permitted on Commons ? Nick 01:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- It is correct to say that the title itself -- "Grey's Anatomy" -- is not copyrighted. This image of the title, however, is both copyrightable and very likely registered as a trademark as well. (Hollywood is obsessive about such things.) I'd remove it. MikeGodwin 18:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Greystitle.jpg is open. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 03:18, 05 December 2007 (GMT)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This category was deleted on 09:28, 4 September 2007 for the reason: {{duplicate|:Category:Statues of animals}}' (and the only contributor was User:Postdlf). This reason is nonsense, since we have developed structures in Commons from both Category:Sculptures and Category:Statues, which are different subjects (consult a dictionary). More, the deletion of correct categories is contrary to Commons policy.
Category:Sculptures of animals is needed for the classification operations, so I request its undeletion. --Juiced lemon 13:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
This category was deleted on 15:40, 9 June 2007 for the reason: content was: '{{badname|Category:Egyptian antiquities collections}}'.That is a technical detail, not a reason. More, the deletion of correct categories is contrary to Commons policy.
It's pathetic to realize that some administrators are unable to open a dictionary and learn the meaning of simple words, like the difference between a “collection” and a “museum”. As long as no basic knowledge is required for adminship, it would be better to forbid the deletion of categories for spurious reasons.
Category:Egyptological museums is necessary for classification operations, therefore I request its undeletion. --Juiced lemon 10:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Why ?[edit]
Why u deleted this image ? i use it on my favorite singer's page , i don't know why u delete my pics without any reasons !! —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Mansourist (talk • contribs)
- Because you do not own the copyright on them. See COMMONS:Licensing for information on acceptable uploads. -Nard 11:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bozin Pavlovski[edit]
Bozin Pavlovski (novelist)
Bozin Pavlovski is born in Macedonia on 7 January 1942. After living in former Yugoslavia and United States, from 1990 he is based in Melbourne, Australia. Pavlovski studied literature at the University of Skopje and graduated in 1971. For over thirty years he was a publisher of world literature in former Yugoslavia. Since 1989, he has divided his time as a professional novelist traveling between Europe and Australia.
Bozin Pavlovski has written fourteen novels in Macedonian, out of which ten have been translated in English in collaboration with authors and friends, including James Thomev, Biljana John, Michael Serafinov and his daughter Elena Ciavarella, with supervision by Irina Dunn. The novels are: ‘Winter in Summer’, ‘Home is Where the Heart is’, ‘The Red Hypocrite’, ‘Eagle Coat of Arms’, ‘A Novel for My Departure’, ‘Journey with My Beloved’, ‘Egyptian Dreamer’, ‘The Agony of Macedonia’, ‘The Milk of Human Kindness’, ‘The Beauty and the Marauder’.
Recognitions and Awards
In 1988 Bozin Pavlovski was elected as a member of Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts in the Department of Literature. There are more than 40 foreign editions, and more than 150 Macedonian editions of his works.
Pavlovski has won numerous literary awards including Interbalkan Award for Literature in Greece (2002).
Literary works
Novels
Miladin from China (1967) Duva and The Flea (1973) West Aust (1977) The Red Hypocrite (1984) Neighboring The Owl (1987) Return to Fairy Tales (1989) Eagle Coat of Arms (1997) Journey with My Beloved (2000) Egyptian Dreamer (2001) A Novel for My Departure (2003) The Agony of Macedonia (2004) The Milk of Human Kindness (2005) The Beauty and The Marauder (2006) Winter in Summer (2007)
Short stories and non - fiction (in Macedonian)
Fantasti (1964) Ludisti (1967) Makedoncite otade Ekvatorot (1971) Collection of short stories (1980) Taga za mojata prva tatkovina (2002) Nazad kon razumot (2003) Rozovo na crnoto (2005)
References
The works of Pavlovski have resulted in bibliography comprising of almost thousand entries. Alain Bosquet wrote about the French translation of the novel ‘West Aust’ in "Le Monde”,” this novel has an astonishing stratified multi-Iayered projection with a two fold drama". Yann Queffelec emphasized in "Le Nouvel Observateur" that "a powerful and truthful novel in which the words are full of meaning and warmth" had been brought before the French readers, whereas Nichita Stanescu compared Pavlovski with some distinguished American novelists in "Luceafarul".
What characterizes Bozin Pavlovski’s opus as a whole is the fresh starts of each work. The poetic and structural art of his fiction is matched by the larger philosophical themes, wrote Darie Novaceanu in "Cartea romaneasca".
In his short stories, and particularly in his novels, Pavlovski has reached new creative peaks in contemporary fiction: he has made the large theme of emigration his very own, giving it a focus both indispensable and necessary.
Two things characterize the novels of Pavlovski: the outer world of the wanderer or migrant and the inner world of the passionate seeker of a centre of gravity for the ethical questions that assail the restless individual in our times. Pavlovski has deepened the vision of human destiny in dealing with unfortunate people with divided souls, dissecting humanity in a new society – his heroes experience conflicts, which augments their loneliness and estrangement.
The most remarkable job that Pavlovski does is to create heroes with capacity to tremble in the air a few fingers above the ground after it has been pulled from under their feet. The analysis of the characters and their existential dilemmas in all their concrete detail is done in a style that is lucid, passionate and astonishing.
Links Website
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image:Rosenau Stadionplan.JPG[edit]
This image was deleted following a short discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Rosenau Stadionplan.JPG. The reason for deletion was that the image appears to be scanned from a brochure. Now the original uploader has replied and stated that the image is indeed a photograph of a public sign. I think this is covered by freedom of panorama and therefore think that the image can be undeleted. --rimshottalk 14:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Minerva_statue_Cherbourg.jpg[edit]
qwikipedia could bring back the picture of Minerva statue Cherbourg please
- I'm afraid, looking at the deletion discussion here, it's not going to be possible to restore the image. The image was under a Non Commercial licence which is incompatible with Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Our work is redistributed by others who may use work for Commercial Purposes (even sites carrying adverts can be classified as commercial). There's also the question of derivative artwork legislation, I'm completely unaware of the nature of the statue, it's location and such, but in some circumstances, a photograph of a 3D artwork can be considered a derivative work, and thus falls under the copyright of the sculptor/creator of the 3D work. There's different rules and regulations on this depending on where you upload the photo and where the image was taken, so if you've any concerns about that, don't hesitate to ask. Nick 02:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bradley01.jpg..to..Bradley23.jpg[edit]
Dear all,
The files (Bradley01.jpg, Bradley02.jpg, Bradley03.jpg, Bradley04.jpg, Bradley05.jpg, Bradley06.jpg, Bradley07.jpg, Bradley08.jpg, Bradley09.jpg, Bradley10.jpg, Bradley11.jpg, Bradley12.jpg, Bradley13.jpg, Bradley14.jpg, Bradley15.jpg, Bradley16.jpg, Bradley17.jpg, Bradley19.jpg, Bradley20.jpg, Bradley21.jpg, Bradley22.jpgand Bradley23.jpg)
are all images of my own 3D work in 3DSMAX 8.0. I created this bradley tank in 3DSMax 8.0 and rendered all screenshots using the same software.
Sincerely, Zaid
- To others it looks like a copyrighted video game screenshot. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 21:45, 08 December 2007 (GMT)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I am the creator and original uploader of this image and I request that it be removed from Wikimedia because the subject release I hold is not compatible with the image's current licensing.
A deletion request for this image was made [1] here. My contribution to the discussion was ignored and the deletion request closed.
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Polydactyly.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded the image several years ago - before the licensing guidelines - with a clear disclaimer that it was to be used only for 'educational use'. Thereafter, the image was deleted and reuploaded (and improperly re-licensed) by Guidod as part of the switchover to more strict licensing guidelines.
The subject release from the depicted individual I have in my possession indicates that educational use is the only permissible use. This is too narrow to release the image under the GFDL. Therefore, in my reading the continued hosting of the image on Wikimedia Commons places me in violation of Federal U.S. copyright law, and its presence on Wikimedia Commons places Wikimedia in violation of the same laws.
Please delete the image from all Wikimedia servers. Ikkyu2 21:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- But how do we know you are who you say you are? -Nard 21:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you're an admin, presumably you can look through the page history and see that I'm logged in as the same user who originally uploaded the image. Ikkyu2 21:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- And actually, if you wanted to go a little further than that, you could go onto the Wikipedia page about polydactyly and see that a few minutes after the picture was originally uploaded, Wikipedia user ikkyu2 (also me) put the picture on that page. You could send email to both this account and the Wikipedia account if you wished to receive email confirmation that we're the same guy. Ikkyu2 21:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
This is undeletion requests. If you want this deleted, go to deletion requests and/or see the deletion guidelines. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 21:36, 08 December 2007 (GMT)
- See the deletion guidelines yourself, please. They state that appeals of previously closed deletions are to be conducted here. Ikkyu2 07:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
LINBURY[edit]
a file on libury has been deleted a lot of friends and family have had to use other resources to obtain material they need wikipedia seems to get increasingly disappointing
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bradley01 to Bradley23, What is the solution then??[edit]
If people think that the images are screenshots from a videogame, What am I supposed to do then? It's my own work. I am the creator of these images. What do I need to do to put them back up again? What exactly is required from me to do here?? no one is giving me the answer. I created this 3D model and I rendered the images and then uploaded them.
Thanks, Sincerely, Zaid
- Hi Zaid - it might help if you tell us what the images are meant to represent? I'm prepared to believe that you created them from scratch if you tell me that. Otherwise I'm sure you realise what it looks like to us :) Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 03:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh ok, sure. I'll tell you. I'm an online student and was taking this 3DSMAX course and we had to create a Full tank with it's surrounding environment and present it as our final project and this Bradley was my final project in the course and I scored A because of it. I placed these images in our class forum and now it is not working.
Thank you very much. Sincerely, Zaid
Maybe you should make sure that you're the copyright holder of the files anyway. You might send a proof (watermarked screenshots, etc.) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Christian NurtschTM 09:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org like Mr.Nurtsch said. I attached 6 screenshots with proof that I created these images.
Thanks. Zaid
- Done OK, seems to check out. The e-mail to OTRS is at Ticket#: 2007120910005532. Sorry about the trouble, we have to make sure we're not infringing on anyone's copyright :) Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 01:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Zaid
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
User:Zirland deleted another image that had a clean license. [2] How is it possible for this image to be copyright violation when it is in the public domain and the image was created in 1897 by the British officers [3] The subject in the image (en:Abdur Rahman Khan) died in 1901, more than 100 years ago. The person who took the picture is not listed, mostly likely he also died more than 70 years ago. So I strongly believe that this image is perfectly ok to be uploaded again. If it is then I will like it to be undeleted or that it be OK so I can go ahead and upload the same image from that site my self.--Executioner 17:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:Abdur_Rahman_Khan.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment. What's taking long? I believe the correct license to use is PD-UK-unknown for this image.--Executioner 18:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Restored. It appears to be a mere scan of a PD-Old image. I would leave the copyright tag as it is; PD-UK-unknown would normally be used for a more modern image that is permissible uner the 'anonymous works' section of the UK copyright Act. --MichaelMaggs 07:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Undeletion of Pinews and picture[edit]
I don't know exactly why pinews has been deleted. The picture was a screenshot and I have a right to publish it, as I'm a member of the PI team with full administrative permissions. As for the content of the article I know it would be more interesting for the German wiki site - as it's about the biggest German weblog. On wiki Germay they told me they wouldn't publish it out of political reasons. I had hoped the English communitiy would be a bit more neutral on this. Thanks for any help. Amerasu 13.46 25. Nov. 2007 (CET)
- Pinews had nothing to do on Commons since this is just a list of weblinks. As for Image:PI-News.jpg, which was a screenshot of http://www.pi-news.net/, a proper permission should be sent to OTRS by the editorial team. — Xavier, 13:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Not done --MichaelMaggs 07:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
undelete request[edit]
Why is "Barry Daybre" deleted? Please undelete.
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image:Dita Von Teese Nude Martini Glass 2.jpg[edit]
I'm sure I remember this image being properly licensed. It was even on the Wikipedia. It was deleted by an admin because it had no license for a period of time. I've tried contacting the admin but they don't seem to be around at the moment. Would somebody please undelete this and see whether the license wasn't removed at some point? If so, we should have a proper deletion request before removing the image. --Simonxag 22:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've restored the image at Image:Dita Von Teese Nude Martini Glass 2.jpg. Please fix the problems with it by filling out the required fields. Cary Bass demandez 23:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Not allowing pictures of commons objects such as milk cartons is absurd. As long as the object isn't making a counterfeit product the use is non-infringing. -Nard 23:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not so I'm afraid. Even though a milk carton is a common product, the picture and the design printed on the front have copyright which we must respect. Simply posting here infringes that copyright. --MichaelMaggs 07:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Not done; full of copyrighted material. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 02:14, 15 December 2007 (GMT)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image was mistakenly deleted by User:Zirland on November 24, 2007 as copyright violation... it was restored on December 11, 2007 by User:MichaelMaggs under PD-Old... and on December 13, 2007 it was speedy deleted by User:S1 as copyright violation. [4] This image does not qualify as copyright violation because it is old where copyrights no longer apply. [5] Can we restore it and stop deleting it please. The correct license as I said early is PD-UK-unknown which applies to any old UK photograph that was created before 1937 and its author is unknown, regardless if it is scanned copy or original one. We may also use PD-Old because that license also covers the image.--Executioner 13:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- The copyvio tagger said that the licence didn't apply to Afghanistan. Done anyway as {{PD-UK-unknown}} because the original copyright holder was based in the UK. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 02:20, 15 December 2007 (GMT)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image:4513 - Milano - Duomo - Portone centrale - Ianua coeli - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 8-Mar-2007.jpg[edit]
Re:
- Image:4513 - Milano - Duomo - Portone centrale - Ianua coeli - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 8-Mar-2007.jpg
- Image:4514 - Milano - Duomo - Portone centrale - Ianua mystica - Turris davidica - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 8-Mar-2007.jpg
- Image:4515 - Milano - Duomo - Portone centrale - Fons amoris - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 8-Mar-2007.jpg
Hallo, there was a mistake. The discussion cited in the deletion log as a reason for the deletion dealt with the bronze door (whose author died less than 70 years ago), not with the jambs, that having been sculpted in the Baroque period are in the Public Domain. So please undelete these three images (alone). Thank you. --User:G.dallorto 17:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Serious accident avoided rad dose.png[edit]
Image:Serious accident avoided rad dose.png This picture should be returned. It was removed with the unspesified reason of having "essential information" missing. The picture had all information on lisence and authorship and there was a permission to use it, so everything was in order. The deletion might have been accidental. It is very important in many articles about radiation safety and protection and as a result of the deletion there are many broken links in Commons and national Wikipedias alike. Thank you for the consideration. --Tungsten 17:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Done. The deletion was apparently a mistake. --Boricuæddie 23:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Portada del libro AUDACIA escrito por mi padre Carmelo Torres y diseñada por mí en 1991. Carlos Alfredo Torres Fletcher 2310 Windmere Ct Marietta Georgia 30062 USA. El copyright holder de la obra soy yo, pues la fotografía es de autoría mía (Plaza de Toros de Can Cún México 1979) soy el diseñador de dicha portada y soy de derecho sucesor de la obra de Carmelo Torres el cual falleció en 2003. No tengo idea del por qué se han atrevido a tocar dicho archivo.
Cover of the book BOLDNESS written by my father Carmelo Torres and designed by me in 1991. Carlos Alfredo Torres Fletcher 2310 Windmere Ct Marietta Georgia The 30062 USA. I am the Copyright holder of the work , because teh following reasons:
a- I am the author of the photography (Bullring of Can Cún Mexico year 1979) b- I am the designer of this cover and c- I am the successor of the copyright work of Carmelo Torres which passed away in 2003.
I do not have any idea why you are deleting this file because I did all the claims on the uploading.
—the preceding unsigned comment was added by Cartof (talk • contribs) 14:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- We get a lot of uploads by people who think that uploading someone else's work to Commons or scanning a book cover makes them the copyright holder, so since you didn't provide the same sort of detail in the image description as you did here, that's probably why it was deleted. Your claims seem credible, so I would support undeletion, but we'll give others a little time to comment. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear LX: I denounced LUPO as a Vandal, he already deleted the image. Who regulated the so named "administrators"? How you can stop him in order to protect this page of such vandalic acts? Thanks in advance. As you can see I put my request and even dough he still deleted the image. —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Cartof (talk • contribs) 12:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Would've been nice of User:Cartof to tell me about this undeletion request. I'm not clairvoyant! Note that the articles Cat Fletcher, Carmelos Torres, and Miriam Fletcher are all unsourced. The only confirmation on Cat Fletcher I've been able to find is an (otherwise empty) IMDB entry saving that one "Carlos Fletcher" was the co-producer of Street Survival.[6] Please also see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Cat Fletcher.jpg... Lupo 14:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please be civil. User:Lupo is not a vandal. Be very careful about using such terms to describe well-established contributors. The initial deletion may well have been based on a misunderstanding, but in any case, you have been clearly instructed not to recreate deleted images yourself until the matter has been resolved here, which it hasn't been yet. I neither have the will nor the means to stop another administrator from deleting the images if you recreate them yourself outside of process. In fact, I'd be more likely to prevent out-of-process recreation.
- Administrators are appointed by vote at Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes. In Lupo's case, the vote was 24 in favour to one against.
- The uploads will be restored by an administrator if that is found to be the appropriate action. Please be patient. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Note further that the uploader has already re-uploaded the image as Image:Audacia2.jpg. Lupo 14:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image:Gerb Yalty.jpg[edit]
This image is coat of arms of town of Yalta for nowadays. It's made by Milokumov Sergey Alexandrovich and was adopted by Yalta Town Soviet (decision N 162 from 29.09.2005, see [7]). Please, return it in it's place in Wikimedia.
Done. Please remember to provide the licensing information, or it will be deleted again. --Boricuæddie 18:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
deleting[edit]
please do not delete this page. i need it for my project please, with all my heart.
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This had been tagged as ineligible for copyright due to simplicity, and was deleted as a copyvio. It was an SVG of [8]. I'm not sure if it's ineligible, and I haven't found any guidance for determining if something is. I think this needs more input. --NE2 18:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
![[8]](http://www.phila.gov/streets/LogoSepta.jpg){kind=link}
- Ahem ... en:Image:SEPTA.svg. Evrik 18:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Trademarks are apparently allowed here if they are text in standard fonts or obvious mods but a logo that is distinctive geometry is probably copyrightable. If SEPTA asserts copyright to their logo, which IS distinctive geometry, at least IMHO, it's probably deletable here. You could ask Mike Godwin to comment maybe? ++Lar: t/c 05:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- In this case, the logo is a derivative of an older version - the older version, according to the image page linked above, is PD because it was released before 1978 without copyright notice. --rimshottalk 18:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Trademarks are apparently allowed here if they are text in standard fonts or obvious mods but a logo that is distinctive geometry is probably copyrightable. If SEPTA asserts copyright to their logo, which IS distinctive geometry, at least IMHO, it's probably deletable here. You could ask Mike Godwin to comment maybe? ++Lar: t/c 05:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Undeleted, as the copy on the English Wikipedia is marked as PD. 哦，是吗？(O-person) 00:48, 24 December 2007 (GMT)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello, Majorly deleted this image saying it has copyright violation. However, the image shows only Free Software, was made by me, and I released it to the public domain. Unfortunately I checked the logs and Majorly is inactive for more then one month now, so please undelete the image. If there is any information missing on the image I can fix it, but I can't upload a new one because I don't know any more where the original is. A quick undeletion is important because the image is necessary on the Lazarus articles on many languages and I would like to readd the image to them.
thanks --Sekelsenmat 12:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the picture does not show the editor alone. It also shows parts of the Windows interface: the title bars of the windows and the background image. It is very likely that these are protected by copyright. Icons of other programs can be seen as well, these may also be copyrighted. You can try to follow the instructions in Commons:Licensing#Screenshots, to create a free screenshot of the program. --rimshottalk 14:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)