Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:GothafossWinter.jpg/2

File:GothafossWinter.jpg, delisted, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2016 at 05:48:39

•  Info Unsharp even at preview size. Previous nom failed due to lack of quorum, as regularly happened before delisting noms were allowed in the regular section to encourage greater participation. (Original nomination)
•  Delist -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist per nom. INeverCry (talk) 05:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist per nom. Probably not even a QI, nowadays, and we certainly have way better-quality Arctic photos on the site now! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist unfortunately per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist True. --Mile (talk) 07:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist Per the above. cart-Talk 10:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist It is a shame though. Such a nice scenario. --AWeith (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist per all above. Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist At the time it was taken, this certainly was considered as a fantastic picture, but alas, time changes and technology progresses. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep I hate delistings, everybody can see it: this image is from the year 2003! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist Not outstanding Goodmorninghpvn (talk) 04:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist I'm sorry for this image, but this one doesn't meet FP standards anymore. As Hendric said above, time changes and technology progresses. This very fast progressing of technology is like an ocean in high tide. You have to swim and swim to keep up, otherwise, you will be flooded. --★ Poké⁹⁵ 07:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Delist --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep per Alchemist-hp --Milseburg (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• We should ping User:Tillea for kind of comments, or to improve scaning if possible. Also would like to say (Alchemist-hp) that this is full frame film camera, and Fuji Velvio was very good film, much more than our Kodaks we were buying. Suppose a lot was lost while scanning, old photo, older scanner, if negative is still awailable a lot can come out now. --Mile (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep "Film: Fuji Velvia", picture from 2003 --Ralf Roleček 01:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep as per Ralf above. Yann (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep as per Ralf and Yann above. --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 10:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I don't understand Ralf's argument. Is it that this is now a historical photo and should be judged as such? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I think so. It was good for that time and it got Featured. Why now we "delist" it, for what? Doping? Maybe we should "delist" old champions, because their results are very poor as for nowadays? --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 18:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

• Because it's not up to our standards of what a Featured Picture is. It's perfectly logical, though I guess you don't think anything should ever be delisted, and so be it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

• Ikan Kekek i dont think its historical, if you see Adam Cuerden nominees. Ralf probably corrected, its Fuji Velvia, i said Velvio. --Mile (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support  Support to stop the bot. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep Highly atmospheric shot. --smial 12:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 delist, 6 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--Mile (talk) 08:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)