Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Duomo and Tower of Pisa at sunrise.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by MHoser - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support 2024 and we don't have any FPs of the Leaning Tower. Nice and different perspective, by the way. -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks amazing. --iMahesh (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas nautique du Monde[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
Info created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, very high-resolution, interesting document. Yann (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Lechwe.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:56:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
InfoA Red Lechwe at Port Lympne Wild Animal Park. Created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daftation (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop on 3 sides. Yann (talk) 11:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do you have an image where horns are not cropped? --iMahesh (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja

uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colours Daftation (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spectacular light. ★ 12:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd honestly leave it as it is, wouldn't crop the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 001.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Stunning. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect, looks like an architectural render. --iMahesh (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PO boxes at the historic Chico Post Office (2024)-L1005460.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting and unusual subject, great find. There is a small amount of barrel and perspective distortion it seems? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Leica Super-Elmar 21mm has an extremely low amount of distortion (virtually close to none). Please keep in mind that it's an old building. Oh, also: a good friend showed me this view. If someone deserves credit for finding this gem, it's him. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Micha (talk) 09:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Considering how small the room is, it's amazing what a sublime effect it creates in the image. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Река Коксу осенью 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 22:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
Info created by Marat Nadjibaev - uploaded by Marat Nadjibaev - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great scenery, enhanced by the long exposure. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The blurred flamingo at left is a bit disturbing, but noise is fine. Please consider cropping. Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree a tighter crop would improve this image Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mountain View Cemetery1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Canada
Info: Boulder Mountain above the Mountain View Cemetery, Revelstoke, British Columbia; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Tettigoniidae_(Katydids_or_Bush_Crickets)
Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In my opinion you've gone too far with the colors. The greens appear like radioactive on my screen, and when I check the settings on Lightroom, I see you modified the "tint" (+18%), added whites +54%, and shadows +100%. The insect is sharp but the colors unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks much better. I have cropped the dead spaces, please check. --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think you were not very lucky with the light but I enjoy the careful composition of this photo and the image quality is strong. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Macrocallista nimbosa shell[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
Left Valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
Right valve (Extant)
Left valve (Extant)

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
Info The set shows the shells (2 valves each) of two specimens of the same species. One shell, originating from the Lower Pleistocene, is about 1 - 1.5 million years old, the other is an extant specimen collected alive in 2003. Both specimens come from Florida; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 08:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casio W-96H.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. Daftation (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Honestly I preferred your last one, I found the colours and the background more interesting, but this is again good product photography and deserves a star. I understand that people might find it a little low on wow but that's a matter of the genre, still, I think it would be cool if we could feature good product photos like this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coup de foudre et bateaux amarrées aux cotes de la Galite.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Lightning
Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture. Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 22:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a shot! --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Impressive but it would nice to get rid of the green lines around the rock below the lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think there is a bit of camera movement, but overall the immense wow factor and strong composition makes this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool shot! Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support IMO a bit oversaturated but I really like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20 Thanks for the support and feedback - only +2 saturation in PS but happy to dial it back if others feel the same. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trier, 07-12-2023 (actm.) 26.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 04:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info When we are taking photographs, we pay attention to objects that are often overlooked, such as this rusty link chain with a ring anchored in an ancient quay wall near the Römerbrücke over the Moselle in Trier.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am sorry, but not a Featured picture TOUMOU (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't feel anything too, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject isn't exceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing interesting here -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Residential by Carrer Sant Josep in Finestrat, Alicante, Spain, 2024 January.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
Info A really unusual composition but I like it a great deal. created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting compo. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the composition, although there are some strange contours around the leafs. --Micha (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice place. It’s often very difficult to find a satisfying composition in such narrow corners; here this was achieved with real success. – Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moosheide im herbstlichen Morgenlicht (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
Info IMO a really beautiful composition. created by GZagatta - uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great lights and composition, but there is vignating isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The solitary tree creates a wonderful mood of hope in the scenery. The slight vignetting emphasizes this, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light Daftation (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Bonda tribe of Odisha drinking Mahua drink.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
Info created and uploaded by Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi - nominated by iMahesh -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ǃǃ Terragio67 (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Year of Africa probably. --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PetarM: Thanks for the review, but that's from India and yes they are part of the first wave of migration from Africa about 60,000 years ago. --iMahesh (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should atleast respect the author by giving space and time to respond, please dont take everything into your hands unless I ask to. Search engines provide enough data but respect the owner of the picture to thank or share the gratitude too. Very weird and immature behaviour @IM3847 Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@IM3847 Is it still my picture or you owned it?, Im very much confused with these kind of comments. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment According to the guidelines, nominated images should not have signatures in the picture: "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." It was added during the nomination process. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to SHB2000 for restoring the latest version. @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: You should also restore your other two photos that were already marked as quality images. Not only did you add a signature, but you also reduced the resolution so much that both images are only a few kilobytes in size due to very low resolution and high compression: Photos 01 and 02. Pictures that have already been tagged (QI, FP or VI) cannot be modified in this way. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad they released their content under a CC license if they didn't want their photos to be edited this way. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi, per above, watermarks are not allowed on QI or FPC or FP images. Please revert to the original version. If you don't want anyone to edit your photos in overwrites, please use messages on the file page instead. Take a look at this photo and this one to see what such texts and templates can look like. --Cart (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garo people at khagrachori 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info Uploaded by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No wow and technically not one of the best. --Micha (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oroville State Theatre during blue hour (2024)-L1005456.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 05:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere. Wolverine XI 08:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The pink light is a special element in the composition. ★ 13:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support The lights are beautiful and the pink and blue colors together are also beautiful here and the accuracy in the crop of the image is even more decisive. I wish I had taken this photo. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An outstanding photograph that makes the viewer believe that the great era of American Art déco has returned. The light, angle, composition, and timing are perfect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I usually find this style kitschy, but it is great here. Yann (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:048 Lioness during golden hour of the morning at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Inspirational. Wolverine XI 08:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazing Stories, November 1928.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper illustrations in color
Info created by Amazing Stories, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really cool artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porta de aço elétrica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
Info Eletric roller shutter door. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This kind of photography is always interesting, but I can't find any wow here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very minimalist! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the door of my office.

(by the way, I just changed the category to Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism) ★ 23:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a bit of a grey area – though after all, they're not photography concepts that exist in isolated bubbles; an overlap is expected (and this is one of them). Cart's suggestion also makes sense. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Minimalism is fine when the light is special, or when something extra makes you feel "wow". Unfortunately here it is just a boring texture with uneven light, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I too would go with 'Texture Photography' on this. It makes most sense. --Cart (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the shutter white or grey in real life? BigDom (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
White, but the morning light made the top a little darker, grayish. ★ 00:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin, nothing wrong with it but just not speaking to me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Micha (talk) 09:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abacate.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Avocado fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks cool for me, nice composition. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Several aspects of this image make me feel this is not one of the best of the website. First, the background at the right and at the left, then the lack of sharpness in the corners, and finally the narrow depth of field, probably automatically set in the smartphone.

The guidelines say "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." and here neither the subject is very difficult nor the quality exceptional, compared for example to focus stacked fruits or vegetables in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not very sharp and the irregularity of size means that this is a somewhat messy composition Cmao20 (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support disagree with Basile, but I'd be interested to see how a crop works out. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lack of sharpness, light and compo are imo not outstanding. -- Ivar (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't like the composition. --Micha (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barque sur une mer de sel à Chott Jrid.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 06:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality. Daftation (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Oversaturated? ★ 12:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poetic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a better image after deciding to desaturate it. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning subject and composition. Image quality not perfect but doesnt matter because it's so lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al Fahidi Bench.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 19:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Arab Emirates
Info created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overblown lights at the left. Would be much better with lights correction, but not sure if this is correctable at all. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think portrait works for this image. Wolverine XI 08:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I quite like the portrait composition but I think it needs a perspective correction and the tilt to be fixed, and I fear that this would make the bench a little too close to the edge of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Daftation (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beyond the Black, Dancing In The Dark Tour, Stuttgart 2024 (28) (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 11:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info created by Robin Müller, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, impressive posture and facial expression. – Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Felino Volador (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 00:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe she is little a bit too much to left. But fine motion. --Mile (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Please fix the chromatic aberrations visible around the stones and the wall at the bottom right -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sur Lightroom, "Pinceau" (sélection) -> "Supprimer la frange" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas lightroom. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de problème. Voir lien ci-dessus -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 21:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-05-09 10-15-36 FortDeRoppe.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per above. ★ 23:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Perspective problem, at the left. Wall is not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree that the floor is falling down. I prefer the other image, it is depped and the lights make it more interesting, this one is not wowing to me --Poco a poco (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Should be centered, and the left side is especially subpar. Wolverine XI 08:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but per Poco. This one lacks something in terms of the composition, too much of the frame is just a bare wall. Quality is good but IMO QI not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) Mount Sheba.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info No FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose you said "No FP", therefore not an FP – jk, Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and plain background with an appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! BigDom (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the background! Wolverine XI 21:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plains zebras (Equus quagga) Maputo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:51:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
Info Quite a few zebra FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice reflections. Cmao20 (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good composition.--Terragio67 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice mirror image, good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photographers in Rabat.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 17:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it would be better without the two standing figures behind the photographers, but still good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support that standing fellows. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment So this was taken without the subjects knowing they were photographed? —kallerna (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment —kallerna I would still say spontaneous shot, not planed. For candid, i would think bushmans with extra zoom, hiding and waiting some superstar by pool next house, so they know what are they waiting and probably know what kind of photo will they get. --Mile (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice typical tourists scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Funny but too busy compostion. It would work without the guy passing by in the background, with his finger on his nose. He seems embarrassed to be in the frame. The two ladies behind are also distracting. And the wall at the right has nothing special. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I like the idea and it's a good candid shot of the photographers, very natural. I don't mind the wall on the right which adds to the candid nature, making you feel like you're watching these photographers from round a corner. But the people in the background, especially the man, are just too distracting for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Average composition when taking background into account. --Thi (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile and others. Yann (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile and BigDom. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The guy bombs the photo, unfortunately. Wolverine XI 21:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 157.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 12:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Young woman of the Mundari tribe in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pose. ★ 13:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning sharpness. Nice comp. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light, composition, and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Theyyam, the dancing God, is a ritual art form of Kerala. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again, not an FP with this crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to say.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose some of the drummers are difficult to see against the background. Could be fixed with editing. Schierbecker (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tried my level best. Since it is a lowlight photography hard to remove shadows. Now please watch. If somebody helps to improve more i will send the original file on email.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Heavy noise reduction and tight framing but the masquerade is fascinating. Ermell (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
Info Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east wall, with a height of 2400 m the highest mountain wall in the Alps; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice compo. Wolverine XI 03:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view of the highest mountain wall in the Alps (see nomination). – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. --Micha (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scarlet Veil (51013483841).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Charlie Marshall, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by ~~Yann~~ SHB2000
Support Perfect composition. -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann as uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We already have a similar FP of the same woman. ★ 13:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the other one is better, but this one is sufficiently different also to make FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I withdraw my nomination~~ Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know I live in a hurry, but you should wait a little longer. ★ 21:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cart! SHB2000 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality of the existing FP is much better. Compare the eyes, the nose and the mouth. Also too similar to the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2024 -- 4263-7.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite an unusual perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree, but a nice light, though Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann. --.Karelj (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I have been going back and forth on this but I am not sure the composition really works. It feels like the wheel is a bit of an afterthought, placed at the edge of the frame. I think it would have worked better with more wheel and less OOF background Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurry background covers too much of the picture, while the wheel only covers a portion too small for my liking. --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support A very interesting and unusual composition, probably too unusual for us. It reminds me of some paintings which show a person looking at a distant landscape or town; in these paintings the nominal subject is that distant object, but they emphasize the person in order to allow the viewers to identify themselves with that person; so in some regard the real subject is the contemplation of the person who looks at that distant object (example). I vaguely remember some photographs which use the same approach, but combine it with a key feature of photography (the interplay of sharp and unsharp) by putting the focus on the person and throwing the landscape/town out of focus, still keeping it recognizable. Now in this photograph the wheel plays the role of the front person; the standing wheel seems to contemplate the great past and presence of that big industrial area. I guess my explanation is lengthy and unclear, but on these lines the composition actually works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the detailed, yet rather unusual review. I think it's very positive that my intention for the photo is clear. --XRay 💬 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Won't work for me. I cannot tell what the content is, Daftation (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition and black subject don't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Erzbunker -- 2024 -- 4214.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice frame, but the reflective portion is not--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost as beautiful as an Egyptian temple.--Ermell (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating, artistic composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special, imo. An elegance of simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I do not understand the composition. Nice light though. —kallerna (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do understand the composition. It is special and the execution is excellent. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Himmeldunkberg Gipfelkreuz II.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 15:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info Summit cross on the Himmeldunkberg. In the background on the right the Kreuzberg. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Makes me feel cold just to look at it Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Support Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Temporarily changing my supporting vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is resolved. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Snow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good catch, Radomianin. I have taken the liberty to embed the sRGB profile with ExifTool. @Milseburg: This is just a little help, especially if you do not want to edit the image anymore; embedding a colour profile with ExifTool is a lossless operation and has no impact on the image data itself, so your image was not changed by this at all. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not a usual sight from Germany. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I miss wow here. I like snowed landscapes, but preferably with virgin and white (I concur with Frank) snow, not the case here. I also find the crop at the top too tight. I believe that there was FP potential here but I just see a cross that cannot breath at the top, trampled grey snow and a bit of mountains. Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It works fine for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A wonderful view (I can only agree with Radomianin’s first comment); however I have to admit that the whites could be whiter – I have tried it, adjusting the white point makes the whole image even better. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Impressive landscape but as others have said, the white balance is off and the placement of the cross feels a little awkward. BigDom (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Frank Schulenburg.Ermell (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Cmao20, Radomianin, ArionStar, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, SHB2000, Famberhorst, Agnes Monkelbaan, Llez, Poco a poco, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, BigDom, Ermell, and MZaplotnik: Sorry for my absence and thank you for the reviews and criticism. I tried to take this to heart, washed the snow and uploaded a new version. Better and sufficient? --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you very much for the revision, Milseburg. Your editing has significantly improved the picture. I have restored my original supporting vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Milseburg! – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support неплохо. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive like a painting, in my opinion. Thanks for the image improvement, Argenberg. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The light is great and the scene spectacular, but I personally haven't understood the composition. It isn't working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit noisy, but great light and composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco, too busy composition IMO. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 09:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by ~~Yann~~ F. Riedelio
Support Harmonious composition of a simple cup. -- Yann (talk) 09:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hi F. Riedelio, nice photo, but the name is a bit too ambiguous for an FPC. Could you suggest a name that better describes the image? --Cart (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Renaming to "Gray espresso cup with amaretto" commissioned. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll fix this for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The crop is a bit too tight in my opinion to make it to FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Thanks for the review. New version with different cropping. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality, clear and effective composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, for me that is an empty cup. Nothing inside visible. -- -donald- (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Thanks for the review. Description improved.

The photo should represent a cup and not its contents.

As the espresso is served in a half-full cup (about 40 ml), the contents would not be visible from this angle. F. Riedelio • 💬 10:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When you try shots like this, you will have to clean all dust around. For instance, i spent 2-3 h with clock. Also, as above, cup is empty, its just a cup, so cookie and coffee would be nice, now just cookie without coffee and pic is named per coffee. Third objection, spoon could be new or without wearing scratches. I dont see EXIF, but this should be sharp photo (stacked image), here seems like one shot on to much closed Aperture. --Mile (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a language note: This model of small cups are called "espresso cups" even if they are empty. It's a name for the cup size. (example) --Cart (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you put cookie, than i would expect coffee too. Now its a bit spoiled, both or none. It could see size by spoon. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Many thanks for the review and the tips.

Unfortunately, the EXIF data has been lost due to the export from Lightroom. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Thank you. for the the tip. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I believe that some of Mile's comments are too strict (like straches in the spoon) but he has got a point regarding the cookie with an empty cup. I also find the level of detail not the best for an studio photo. I'd have probably used focus stacking here Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Mile. —kallerna (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj 09:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I withdraw my nomination~~ Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dust and scratch improved, generative filling. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to continue the nomination. After this extensive discussion, I am looking forward to the outcome. Thank you in advance for your support.

I have restored the older version of "Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg" and uploaded the modified photo as a new file "Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg". F. Riedelio • 💬 17:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that, you are now in charge of this nomination.

You might also want to take a look at the coffee in File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg, the right side of the coffee looks like it's not totally ok. Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 08:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Platysteiridae (Wattle-eyes, batises and shrike-flycatchers)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very good composition and pretty bird but the bird is quite small in the frame and also the resolution is not huge which means the actual pixel level detail on the bird itself is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. With wildlife photography it is unfortunately very hard to get close to every subject and some birds are more shy than others. This small bird unfortunately didn't stay very long (only a few seconds) while I was approaching very very slowly. Apparently there is only 5 pictures of it on commons and the highest quality one that got it in focus is this one, the second one only beeing of 853x1280 pixels. Out of these 5, only 3 males were photographed and the second highest resolution picture in focus of the male after this one beeing only of 600x400 pixels. There is also no FP of the species nor of the family. The bird was shot with a 600mm lens with a 50 million pixels sensor and as I recall the bird wasn't that far, but it's just a small and shy bird. We have pictures of the same resolution of still subjects that are less sharp. I think that in this picture the light was good and that the picture nicely shows the bird's environment. The feather detail is also quite good considering the bird size in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yeah you're right, I should be consistent Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support The larger crop nicely shows the context and hints at the habitat. – Aristeas (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 2,797 × 1,865 pixels and the bird in this image is very small. The background is too dominant in my opinion. Useful document, but not all the useful images on Commons should be featured. For a FP of a bird, you need at least to be able to see some fine details of the animals at full resolution, not only the branches where it lives. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. In my opinion it can not be expected the same level of detail for a small and shy bird where there is only a few seconds window to take a picture of it without possibility to go closer to it compared to pictures of still objects. Also, we have FP pictures of birds that have the same if not less definition than this one : 1, 2. I actually think this picture has enough level of detail compared to the bird size in real life and to the possibility to get close to it. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Small passerines like this one are among the most difficult subjects for bird photographers. They're skittish and notoriously hard to photograph. A big thank you to Giles for taking this excellent image and sharing it under a free license! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then it's amazing JJ Harrison managed to photograph so many of them in high resolution. Perhaps a matter of equipment -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a matter of resources. Harrison's lens costs about ten times more than Giles's. I think it's a bit unfair to other bird photographers that such expensive equipment should set the "standard" for FPs. We can only be grateful that people with very high-end cameras and lenses donate some photos to Commons, but I don't think they should set the bar for all the FPs in their special fields. Sometimes FPC can be a tad too elitist. --Cart (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JJ Harrison sets the bar for birds like Kabelleger sets it for trains, or Iifar for focus stacked plants / fruits / insects. Equipment matters but also experience, explored places / subjects, patience, skill, chosen composition, etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I also wish more detail but I'm not an expert in bird photography and will support relying on Frank's opinion. What is definitely a minus in my eyes, is the crop, it's too generous. I'd definitely crop more everywhere, but above all the leaves at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed a very good composition: It emphasizes the reliefs on the lamp post, but adds the castle in the background, appropriately out of focus, to intimate the context. – Aristeas (talk) 16:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A composition to be taken into account. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the compo very much, the light is ok but the level of detail is low. It feels like the focus is below the sculptures, so that these are not really sharp. Could you also add some information about this piece? Poco a poco (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is probably the work of the architect Georg Adolph Demmler, probably made in 1845 during the reconstruction of the castle and bridge. However, it is difficult to find information about the lamp post. Maybe someone knows something more?. --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Underexposed, halo effect around main subject. I also find the light rather dull. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 12:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good details, not a bad composition with the castle at right, and of course QI, but dull light and no "Wow" effect for me. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Julian church in St-Julien-de-Toursac (6).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:56:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light, strong distortion. Yann (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed. Light is a bit grey but in this instance I think it doesn't detract. Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like how you've worked the scene that day, but I agree with Yann about the dull lighting conditions. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI, but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light. No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, the subject/combo is not that extraordinary that compensates the lighting Poco a poco (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Passo delle Streghe - Monte Titano - San Marino - GT 05 - 2024 04 30.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 06:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#San Marino
The witches' pass (or Passo delle Streghe) is one of the attractions of San Marino, it is a shortcut that leads from the first tower (Guaita) to the second tower (Cesta) depicted in the background. It puts everyone in great fear due to the steep slope and the overhang on the sides. In the background the fortifications near the tower are literally devoured by nature every spring, each time giving a charm of mystery to the castle located on Mount Titan. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A very nice view and I would be happy to support it. But (sorry to say this) at the branches at the left there are some odd transitions – see image note; maybe a stacking error? It would be great if you could fix this. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support now. Thank you very much! – Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be great if you could document the amount of frames you require for a shot like this one Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are 18 stitched portrait images (6x3). I used Hugin (a free software) to merge all the images. Each image has a resolution of 24 megapixels (4000x6000), but I mainly only used the central parts of the images (2200x3300), because they offer greater guarantees of success being sharper than the edge. Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMO a bit busy composition, dull light. —kallerna (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]