Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taxidermy of a snake skin.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Taxidermy of a snake skin.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2017 at 19:28:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
Info created by Wagner Souza e Silva - uploaded by Joalpe - nominated by Lucas.Belo -- Lucas.Belo (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment Hello everyone, this is my first indication for Featured and when reading the criteria for the nominating I noticed that this image seems to fits for this award. Among many other relevant characteristics, this image has a high definition, it's result of a reported GLAM and it also has a detailed metadata, describing for example the snake skin's species. Lucas.Belo (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Lucas.Belo (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)- Support I find there is a bit too much space left empty at the top, so I would prefer a tighter crop, but I'll support it anyway for novelty. – LucasT 20:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I was thinking about this as a QI, and I'll have to give some thought to this as an FP before making a decision. But before I do: What are the white spots on the black background surface? Bits of dust? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Ikan Kekek: , there is no possibility of indicating this image to the QI, because the author is not a Commons user. The spots on the black background are particle air and environment, but I believe this can be improved by users. -- Lucas.Belo (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right about QI. I'm not feeling impelled to vote for a feature for this picture. I probably would if the dust was digitally cleaned, but maybe I'm being unreasonable. In any case, I won't vote against a feature, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Interesting. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support variatio delectat --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good shot, ok the dust on the black could be cloned out, but overall good light and feel for the texture. --cart-Talk 08:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Johann Jaritz, W.carter, Martin Falbisoner, Daniel Case, and Ikan Kekek: , Lucasbosch, tighter cropped, and digital cleaning, removal of the dust around the object, xoxo -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 04:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Very interesting. Probably worth noting on the image page that this is anaconda skin using plain English (in addition to the species binomial already included). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Thanks a lot, Rodrigo. I support this now as a very good and highly interesting scientific picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 04:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 11:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 04:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
