User talk:Lucas.Belo

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lucas.Belo!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cross section of Equus ferus caballus (horse) head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --J. Lunau (talk) 21:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (Capybara skeleton).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skull Hircum (goat) side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus domesticus (Domestic pig skull), side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equine forelimb (Technique of dehydration).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 21:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo skull). Specimen of buffalo skull and horns prepared by the bone maceration technique. Front view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callithrix penicillata (Black-tufted marmoset). Taxidermy specimen - side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caiman yacare (Wetland alligator). Taxidermy specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and the only taxidermy specimen in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capra hircus (Goat heart). After technique of gelatin injection and diaphanization..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bos taurus (ox) articulation. Bovine articulation, after technique of dissection and freeze-drying - piece showing knee joint of bovine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teaching model representing different phases of the human embryonic development..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support as best in scope, but please clean up the stray marks in black areas of the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis lupus familiaris (dog) heart. Dog heart, after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization – specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis familiaris (Great Dane dog) heart. Great Dane dog heart after technique of gelatin injection and spalteholz diaphanization..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis familiaris (Dogue de Bordeaux dog) heart. Dogue de Bordeaux dog heart after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
• Temporary  Oppose - Once again, Spalteholz diaphanization must be defined. This needs to be done with every photo in which it was used. Every one. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: I have fixed it once more; I have written to Lucas and Horadrim, so new candidates should be done adequately. --Joalpe (talk) 00:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Thanks for taking care of this. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ovis aries (sheep) heart. Ovine heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bos taurus (ox) heart. Bovine heart, after technique of latex injection and formalin fixation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis familiaris (Schnauzer dog) heart. Schnauzer dog heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Seems to be unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus domesticus (domestic pig) heart. Pig heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equus ferus caballus (horse) articulation. Limb of the horse, after technique of dissection and freeze-drying. Piece showing the bones and ligaments of the forelimb - side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Tiven2240 (talk) 02:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teaching model representing establishment of the shape of the human embryo..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful representation --Tiven2240 (talk) 02:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Tiven2240, when you are the first person to vote on a nomination and support it, you need to also change the "status" line from "nominated" to "supported". I didn't know that at first, either. I've taken care of it for you this time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Felis silvestris catus (cat) heart. Cat heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Tiven2240 (talk) 02:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cebus apella (monkey) fetus. Monkey fetus after technique of gelatin injection and spalteholz diaphanization..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bubalus bubalis (domestic water buffalo) kidneys - After technique of formalin fixation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There are many errors in your appointment. The binomial must be followed by the vernacular name in English, the category must be that of the species not of the genus. I corrected. You must give in the caption of the image the binomial by only the genus, because one could fear that it is not this species. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Archaeodontosaurus! I understood about the category belonging to the species and thank the nomenclature tips, Thanks! Lucas.Belo (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Warning: You have not yet modified the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I'm not sure if I understood the problem. You mean caption in the File or in the V.I. scope? I've changed both, to make it less ambiguous. Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from 'Bubalus bubalis (buffalo) kidneys to 'Bubalus bubalis (domestic water buffalo) kidneys --Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phoca vitulina (harbor seal) kidney, after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The name of the species must be given in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Archaeodontosaurus! I have changed the scope to harbor seal. Is it correct now? Thanks! Lucas.Belo (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support OK now; Look at scope changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hippopotamus amphibius (hippo) kidneys after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The image must be placed in the category of the species not in the genus. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Archaeodontosaurus! I have changed the category. Is it correct now? Thanks! Lucas.Belo (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support OK now. Look at scope changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Question Should we be using "hippo"? I've always understood that as just short for hippopotamus, the real word. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

I was astonished like you by the term hippo; But in the article in English it is well given as a vernacular name. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

 Comment nobody in UK really uses hippopotamus now. Charles (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

I see. We do in the U.S. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus domesticus (domestic pig) kidneys. After technique of formalin fixation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment In caption: either in the title or in the description the name of the species in binomial must appear. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Archaeodontosaurus It's ok now? Thanks! -- Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support OK good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus domesticus (domestic pig) testis after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment In caption: either in the title or in the description the name of the species in binomial must appear. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Archaeodontosaurus It's ok now? Thanks! --Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Looks at the scope changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus scrofa domesticus (pig) fetus, after technique of Spalteholz diaphanization - specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus scrofa domesticus (pig) fetus, after technique of Spalteholz diaphanization - specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Female reproductive tract of a pig (Sus scrofa domesticus), after technique of formalin fixation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prochilodus lineatus (streaked prochilod) ovary, after technique of latex injection and formalin fixation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support in the new scope, as edited by me. Unique and useful. However, if you decide to revert my edits, I may oppose, because "fish reproductive system" seems like an overly broad category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capra aegagrus hircus (goat) uterus, after technique of formalin fixation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The binomial must appear in the caption of the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)~

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I changed the description. --Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camelus Calvariae (camel) kidney, longitudinal cut. Camel kidney, after technique of formalin fixation - side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The binomial must appear in the caption of the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I changed the description. --Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teaching model representing different parts of the mammal heart - front view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support The image is of great quality, with good sharpness and lighting. Very useful. -- Philip Terry Graham 09:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Taxidermy of a snake skin.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taxidermy of a snake skin.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Didactic model of a mammal heart (prominence for aortic branch)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - very useful, thanks mostly to great quality and lighting, for those studying the subject as specified by the scope. Philip Terry Graham (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Lucas.Belo/common.js

Hi Lucas.Belo, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Lucas.Belo/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 1 character 31: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: / * jshint scripturl: true * /
2. ISSUE: line 2 character 101: Script URL. - Evidence: mw . util . addPortletLink ( 'p-TB' , 'JavaScript: importScript ( "Teorema: VisualFileChange.js");' , 'Execute tarefa batch' , 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand' );
3. ISSUE: line 3 character 32: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: / * jshint scripturl: false * /

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC).

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus scrofa domesticus (Domestic pig) kidneys. Domestic pig kidneys, after technique of of vinylite injection and corrosion. Allows the visualization of the vascular architecture of the piece..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equus (Equine) renal artery. Ureter and equine renal artery, after technique of of vinylite injection and corrosion. Allows the visualization of the vascular architecture of the piece..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose unless the scope can be appropriately changed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Scope updated - Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

OK,  Support. Please try to be careful about nominating photos in scopes that either already have a VI or for which you or one of your colleagues is also nominating another photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equus (Equine) kidney. Equine kidney, after technique of of vinylite injection and corrosion. Allows the visualization of the vascular architecture of the piece..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Most useful in scope. Unless you have another scope for your other nominee in the identical scope, it will be opposed, as you can't have two VIs in the same exact scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bos taurus (Bovine) kidney. Bovine kidney, after technique of of vinylite injection and corrosion. Allows the visualization of the vascular architecture of the piece..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis lupus familiaris (Dog) kidneys, after technique of of vinylite injection and corrosion. Allows the visualization of the vascular architecture of the piece..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I can't decide whether this picture or File:Dog kidneys 02.jpg is more useful. Can I have another opinion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Lucas.Belo, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Didactic model of a amphibian heart - front view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Didactic model of a bovine muscular system..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best available shot of muscle system, fairly instructive.--Peulle (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Didatic model of the internal anatomy of a sheep..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Model for teaching anatomy, piece showing internal chicken organs..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question I think the scope might be a bit too specific: is there a significant difference between the left and right side? Also, what does "syntopy" mean in this context (I only know en:Sympatry#Syntopy)? --El Grafo (talk) 09:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

@El Grafo: Scope updated, it is ok now? -- Lucas.Belo (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

 Support jep, OK for me now. --El Grafo (talk) 18:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi :-)

You did it by yourself :-) Cool! But if there's something I can help, just let me know.
Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@Wieralee: Thanks for the kindness, I did not think I could solve it but it worked. If I need to, I'll remember you rsrsrs.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:José Wasth Rodrigues - Antiga Rua do Rosário (Rua XV de Novembro), Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg

And also:

• File:José Wasth Rodrigues - Batalha de Ituzangó, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 13:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tarsila do Amaral - Retrato de Francisco Aranha Barreto, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg

And also:

• File:Tarsila do Amaral - Retrato de Frei Miguel Arcanjo da Anunciação, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg
• File:Tarsila do Amaral - Retrato de Joaquim do Amaral Camargo, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg
• File:Tarsila do Amaral - Retrato de José Maria Nunes Garcia, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg
• File:Tarsila do Amaral - Retrato de Marechal Arouche, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 16:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Mass adding of statements

You are currently adding statements to 200,000 photos uploaded during WLM. Such a large edit batches need to be approved and marked as bot edits Commons:Bots. Please stop the current run until this is approved as a bot task. GPSLeo (talk) 08:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I've already stopped editing. I'm using Open Refine, I didn't think it would be considered bot editing, but as you mentioned the number of edits is very large and that's why it has already been stopped. Lucas.Belo (talk) 22:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

I created a request to execute this task in Commons:Bots/Requests Lucas.Belo (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)