Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spechtensee gegen Nordosten 01.JPG

File:Spechtensee gegen Nordosten 01.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2015 at 13:22:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Spechtensee gegen Nordosten 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spechtensee gegen Nordosten 01.JPG

547

827

987

547

6000

4000

motion blur? --Laitche (talk)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Austria
•  Info Lake Spechtensee near Wörschachwald, Styria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment A bit too dark at left side? Trees and water has almost the same shade there. -- Pofka (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

 Info @Pofka: New version uploaded, where I have brightened the dark parts on the left a little - but not too much to preserve these early morning lighting conditions. --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support At full resolution this is a big wow -- Christian Ferrer 19:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support At big resolution this has a big wow. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Question I see partial motion blur? in this image, it was taken in windy day? --Laitche (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

@Laitche: Where? Please add a note. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

@Uoaei1: It's about but I added a note. --Laitche (talk) 20:16, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

It was not windy at this time. I rather guess my lens does not show the very best contrast in this area. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Ralf Roleček 19:39, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 19:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately, this is just too unsharp for me. Even at 6 MP, you can see unsharpness on the trees at the left. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral per King. --Tremonist (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't blame you at all for taking this picture. And with less clouds in the sky it might have worked. Unfortunately, the clouds create that large blown area at right which just calls that much more attention to the dark spots on the left. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition and very good atmosphere. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with KoH that the sharpness is not good, but the main problem I see here is the lighting, composition is good, but not striking. Poco² 17:48, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I also think that the composition of bright and dark surfaces is not ideal. — Julian H.^✈ 22:31, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Alma (talk) 15:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

*  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Info Demoted to 'not featured' due to sock double vote. 4 October 2018. --Cart (talk) 21:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)