Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katscha February 2017 06.jpg

File:Katscha February 2017 06.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2017 at 19:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Katscha February 2017 06.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katscha February 2017 06.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Award-winning contemporary residential development Katscha in the historic industrial district in Norrköping, Sweden. Architects: Ingrid Reppen and Kai Wartiainen. The building was awarded the MIPIM Awards 2016 for best residential development. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Well done. – Lucas^T 19:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I don't love the unsharp railing in the near right corner, but that's a very minor element in an excellent photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Wow, you do this light thing so well! And we are once more peeping into people's apartments, but this is thankfully mostly living rooms and kitchens with only 2½ men visible. Can't help wondering how much the top floor apartment here would cost... --cart-Talk 19:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Classy and I don't find it intrusive like the apartment block we had. Charles (talk) 23:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Great. Although the top crop is maybe a little tight. --Code (talk) 05:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, I agree about the crop. Charles (talk) 10:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment @ArildV: The EXIF says 50mm while you added it to the category "Taken with Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Zero-D". Could you please clarify that? --Code (talk) 05:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

  @Code: As mention in the images description is the exif information wrong (aperture and focal length). Laowa works basically like a Non-CPU lens on Nikon and you have to tell the camera the aperture and focal length of the lens. I was using a old Nikon Nikkor 50mm/1.8 AI-S the same evening and forget to change settings in the camera. --ArildV (talk) 05:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Actually I do like the partly unsharp railing. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - Why? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  • because it adds another interesting visual aspect to the composition. Lines are generally an important factor here. The railing helps lead my eyes diagonally to the more central elements of the image, while the blurred part as such provides some depth, i.e. it hints at the actual threedimensionality of the two dimensional representation of reality that every photograph necessarily is... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for the interesting, detailed reply. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Splendid work! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 07:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Support due to the top crop being a little too tight. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 20:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Lucas^T 21:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture