Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial view of Capitol Hill at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Aerial view of Capitol Hill at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 10:03:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by dllu -- dllu (t,c) 10:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (t,c) 10:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Very well done technically, a QI in a heartbeat, but aesthetically undistinguished from any other nighttime cityscape. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)- Support Excellent! That there are other similar pictures is no reason for me to oppose. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support per Lothar. --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support My brains immediately told me: SUPPORT THIS. These streets lights are just stunning here. -- Pofka (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry per Daniel --LivioAndronico (talk) 15:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Halavar (talk) 15:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer 19:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support Quality is so-so, but I like this "urban mess" in this case, especially because you didn't undergone some heavy post processing, which often become plastic. --Mile (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Just curious, why is the quality only so-so? It's a very expensive 36 megapixel camera and lens on a tripod. To my eyes it looks very sharp without noise. The only technical defect I see is that the trees, swaying in the wind, get a bit blurred -- a trade off between car trails and noiseless ISO 100 versus sharp trees. And actually I did some post processing (it's an HDR photo from three exposures so that the roofs of the buildings aren't totally black and so that the lights aren't blown out), but I'm glad people don't notice it. Thanks! dllu (t,c) 21:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Comment Sharpness is OK, motion blurr of traffic, trees isn't problem (not extensive). But if you check the sky there is posterization and banding with some quite big smudge (posterization) on the left. Congrats on camera. --Mile (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 21:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Daniel Case and the sky is posterized as Mile mentioned, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose weak. I like night shots and that one is taken properly in my view (though I'd lift shadows a bit), but I'm not too sure about the composition. - Benh (talk) 14:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Rainbow unicorn (talk) 21:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
