User talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive 31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Zhuyifei1999,

your bot is flagging all my of pictures, because they would contain embedded data. But this is just the preview images embedded in ALL JPEGs coming from current Nikon cameras.

It's fine, but unnecessary to remove this data. But your bot should not file speedy deletion requests on this files!

Thanks in advance.--SOTMUS (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

As far as I see, the bot overwrote the files, not filing speedy deletion requests; even if it did an actual speedy deletion is unlikely. In any case, concatenating JPEG thumbnails after a full JPEG binary file without any pointer to the thumbnail, is pointless and could even be abused, and may be against the JPEG specification. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 00:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I think these files are valid for some meaning of "valid", as they comply with the CIPA Multi-Picture Format specification. See MPF Tags and CIPA DC-007 (2009). Some Japanese cameras produce them (partial list). —RP88 (talk) 03:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

FlickreviewR 2

Hi! Can you modify the FlickreviewR_2's code to tag the images by its own username not by a blocked bot's name? Many thanks! -- Meisam (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Please see User_talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive_3#FlickreviewR_2_.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_bug_report, User_talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive_6#Template_link, User_talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive_22#New_Template --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 22:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
I did a quick implementation (no error handling yet!) of your idea in this template. Instead of putting the fixed bot name, it sends the date to Template:FlickrReviewBot. If the date is before 2012-03-22 11:00:00, it will return FlickreviewR, otherwise it will return FlickreviewR 2. You can replace the content of User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass with User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass/test. Does this solve the problem? -- Meisam (talk) 23:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks good to me. @Jarekt: Looks good to you? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 23:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
I do not understand why do we still use "templates" which reside in the user namespace. They are usually not documented or maintained much. The final template left on the file page should be something that resides in the template namespace. Let me rewiew it a bit, as I am mightily confused about some of those templates. --Jarekt (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
I started Help:Flickr review templates. Lets catalog what we have and which process uses what. Then develop a set of standard templates (in the template namespace) which can be called by others. {{Flickrreview}} template seems almost there but it does not support many valuable parameters used by FlickreviewR (original and clone). --Jarekt (talk) 13:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
@Jarekt: Yeah it's a mess. Now we also gotta add a lot of {{Iffile}} to these templates. Anyhow, do you think having {{FlickrReviewBot}} to determine which bot to show is a good idea? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
@Zhuyifei1999 and Meisam: , I think it is a good hack, but I would prefer to do it right. Let me propose something and you tell me if it would work. I could rewrite {{FlickreviewR}} to do the job of all User:FlickreviewR/... templates. I would take the current set of inputs to {{FlickreviewR}} plus 2 extra: name of the reviewer and "status". The status would be : "pass", "fail", "pass-change", "nosource", etc. and reviewer would be FlickreviewR, FlickreviewR 2, or any other user. User:FlickreviewR/... templates would redirect to {{FlickreviewR}}, but the bot would be changed to add new style templates for future reviews. If we want to correct who reviewed which file in the past we can run a bot and correct the reviewer name at the file level (I could do that). --Jarekt (talk) 16:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
@Jarekt: Good point. Could you implement those templates? I'll change the bot code to use the new templates once they are ready. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
@Jarekt: That's the proper way to do it. I just saw more than 3 years of discussion (without any action) to change the reviewer bot tag and didn't want to make any drastic changes instantly! Let me know if you need any help. -- Meisam (talk) 20:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
@Zhuyifei1999: I am still working on the rewrite of {{FlickreviewR}} and User:FlickreviewR/... templates, but I have a question for you. Which User:FlickreviewR/... templates is your bot actually using? There is no need to work on unused templates. By the way, the interface of {{FlickreviewR}} is now settled and unchanging so you can start modifying your bot to use it, if you want. Also can your bot save the review date in YYYY-MM-DD ISO format? It would be easier to internationalize. --Jarekt (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
@Jarekt: The current set of review templates is listed in the code. As for YYYY-MM-DD, it is already contained in the current timestamp; do you mean HH:MM:SS should be removed? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
HH:MM:SS could stay, I was just looking at dates in "19:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)" format. But I gues that is the version of the code from 8 April 2007. I should have looked at the more resent examples. --Jarekt (talk) 19:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

@Zhuyifei1999: , User:FlickreviewR/... templates are now all calling {{FlickreviewR}}. Can you look at that template and see if you can use it directly? I will be gone for the weekend but can answer questions afterwards. --Jarekt (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

I'll look into it tomorrow. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
@Jarekt: The bot's internal code for all the status are somewhat different from the names of the templates. eg: 'passed' rather than 'pass', 'flickr_not_found' rather than 'notfound'. I could create a mapping in the bot's code, but do you think it would worth it let the template {{FlickreviewR}} handle that natively? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
I added some aliases in Template:FlickreviewR/status aliases add more as you need. --Jarekt (talk) 00:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
@Jarekt: Do these edits look good to you? If so I'll use the same syntax for future reviews --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 04:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
That looks good. --Jarekt (talk) 04:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Ok this is done --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 04:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Runaway bot

See, for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Seattle_-_Ballard_Bridge_repair,_1933_(35391499310).jpg&action=history. This seems to have happened on quite a few images (check FlickreviewR 2 contributions around that time). - Jmabel ! talk 06:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Bataille de Lépante

The photo is of a painting that is in the Vatican. Reproduction of the painting of Georgio Vasari that is in the public domain because of its age.--Entommeures (talk) 17:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

επιλεγω

Gioannania18220 06:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Spbot Gioannania18220 06:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Gioannania18220 "`"Ӝ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gioannania18220 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Στην επιλογή κατηγοροποίησης της διαίρεσης μου επεξεργαζόμενης και χωρίς μορφοποίηση ή και με μορφοποίηση η аёεπίGioannania18220 11:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Gioannania18220 "~"λόγηӷGioannania18220 11:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Gioannania18220 είναιҙ καθοριστική е Προτείνω ӻєҒЁғёҔӖҕҽд κεντρική επιλογή, μόνο жжжԃЂ Gioannania18220 08:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Gioannania18220 "`" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gioannania18220 (talk • contribs) 08:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

FlickreviewR 2 blocked

I've had to block your bot because it's malfunctioning. I posted about it at COM:AN#FlickreviewR 2 malfunctioning; blocked; false copyvio tags. Guanaco (talk) 08:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Guanaco, I did not see the edits but I suspect it was not related to user:FlickreviewR 2 algorithms but to this edit which changed, among other things, output of the template from "reviewed-pass" to "pass", which resulted in images previously labeled as "pass" to get {{Flickrreview}} template. I fixed it about an hour latter, by renaming a sub-template, but I guess there were some mishaps in-between. --Jarekt (talk) 12:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. I don't know much about the internal workings of the bot and its templates, but it's good to learn. The bot's unblocked now. Guanaco (talk) 19:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

00:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Dear Zhuyifei1999,

The flickr review bot is a bit slow marking images with 3,000+ images waiting to be marked. Technically, the images were already marked and should be in the public domain needing review category, I think, but they are still in flickr review needed category. I submitted a re-review for this image and it has not yet been marked. But there are also other new images like this with a CC license that have not been marked yet. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: I think this is because the bot was blocked for several hours, and during that time the backlog built up. The bot is rate-limited on edits, so it'll take some time to catch up. Guanaco (talk) 06:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

YiFeiBot and File:DesiredFileName.ext

(I very probably should have asked earlier.) Would it be possible that YiFeiBot does not pay attention to File:DesiredFileName.ext? See in edit history. I’d love to remove the license tag and missing information box category. Or would the bot be satisfied if an information box and the license tag would be surrounded with a display: none div? Perhaps a bit dangerous, though, because someone could add an hidden good license, but only show an unsatisfying one. — Speravir – 02:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

I've added {{Nobots}}. Hopefully it works. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. OMG, so simple: I will report if it does not work … — Speravir – 23:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Geograph

Can you please suspend YiFeiBot for edits like this [5] There's a problem with another 'bot, HiW-Bot, which is causing edits like this and the cleanup will be easier the less the further processing goes. Thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

HiW-Bot should stop blanking pages. @Hedwig in Washington: --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Stopped the bot for now. This must be an internal problem of AWB, the bot runs without problem for 200k edits in the same configuration and then screws things up big time. Please restart the YiFeiBot. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Started a bug report @ phab:T180079. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Cultural institute painting

Hello, sorry, I saw you managed to write a script to stitch together the tiles, could you please please help me get a copy of this painting? https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/beta/asset/la-torre-de-babel-the-tower-of-babel/lAGJBOd59mqUGQ?hl=en Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parableu (talk • contribs) 14:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Short story: sorry, the script is broken again (and it's my fault), and I don't really have the incentives to fix it. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
@Parableu: Actually, I'll work on this and upload to Commons, but can you first create the file description page for the upload? Examples of the files are at Category:Google_Art_Project --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Gallica下载器不好使了!

https://tools.wmflabs.org/yifeibot/downloaders/gallica.py?id=btv1b8412604p&pages=2&bouton=Go 我按照操作执行,报告错误:Job did not seem to succeed. Please check your input or refresh this page to try again. If this still fail, please contact commons:User:Zhuyifei1999 请问能否修复一下,谢谢! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wujinlong1988 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

这程序已经坏了很久了,我也没时间或者精力去修 --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 17:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
@Wujinlong1988: 不过话说回来,如果你愿意在这里(维基共享资源)为你要的文件建立文件描述页面,并且这页面涵盖足够多的信息(至少{{Artwork}}),我会尽全力找时间修并下载你要的文件/图片。这不仅指Gallica的图片,其他来源也行,只要不是侵犯版权并适合维基共享资源。 --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

These 3 images

Its strange that the flickrbot doesn't mark these 3 images. Only one is a video clip.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

The logs show a lot of urllib2.URLError: <urlopen error [Errno 1] _ssl.c:510: error:1411B041:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_NEW_SESSION_TICKET:malloc failure>, indicating that the host it is running on may be out of memory. Let's see if a restart will fix that. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The flickr API is behaving weirdly again. Why is https://www.flickr.com/photos/emmett_ns_tullos/239891925/sizes/o/ marked as 1000 x 1500 but everything else has an inverse width : height ratio? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

SignBot

Hi. I yust see, that SignBot Yust added {{Unsigned}} on my Talkpage after I add a Magic word there. Could you please fix that? Greethings, Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

19:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

YiFeiBot gone amuk

Your robot is prepending Category:Media missing infobox template to redirects – an obvious error. Useddenim (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@Useddenim: Could you clarify which redirect was affected? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
The files in question were
{{speedy|un-needed redirect; uploaded with incorrect prefix order}}
#REDIRECT[[File:BSicon_fexCONT{#}.svg]]
Useddenim (talk) 00:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Prepending {{Speedy}} before #REDIRECT make the redirect no longer recognized by MediaWiki. My bot follows whatever MediaWiki thinks regarding whether a page is a redirect. Btw: None of the pages you link to has any history or deleted history visible to me. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 00:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Sorry; typo in file names (now corrected). Useddenim (talk) 11:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @Useddenim: Please do not prepend {{Speedy}} (or anything else) before #REDIRECT.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wrongful deletion for:

Extended content
Description
English: Captioned: So Random! Cast Signing at the Disney Channel Pavillion at the D23 Expo The So Random! Cast Signing featured Tiffany Thornton, Sterling Knight, Shayne Topp, Doug Brochu, Allisyn Ashley Arm, Matthew Scott Montgomery and Damien Haas. The event was hosted by Radio Disney's Jake Whetter from Celebrity Take with Jake.
Date August 19, 2011
Source https://www.flickr.com/photos/lorenjavier/6076329148/in/photolist-afUoGc-afUpmD-afX1ch-afWLXE-afWVTG-afUj2V-afWYpE-afUaDF-afWTP9-afWUmL-afWYZU-afU8fD-afWTi7-afWXoC-afWFFo-afU5e2-afWSfJ-afWKC9-afX4NQ-afX1R3-afWZzC-afUixK-afUkEM-afUkan-afUo5H-afWEty-afWHiQ-afU6y4-afUhAK-afWGML-afWLhQ-afUhac-afWRMs-afWNn7-afUmmR-afUmQ4-afUnkB-afTYpF-afUi48-afWQdJ-afTT3p-afUdkX-afWDBA-afU4Av-afUcue-afTTtR-afTTPV-afU3bk-afWGfq-afWDXQ
Author Loren Javier

LICENSE: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer. You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material. A new version of this license is available. You should use it for new works, and you may want to relicense existing works under it. No works are automatically put under the new license, however.

^

The above text clearly states that the image can be redistributed. The Flickr bot had other plans though. -- AlexanderHovanec (talk) 00:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Neither NC or ND is accepted here. Please see COM:L --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)