User talk:Yann/archives 24

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Requesting that you block a user

Hello,

I try to help with nominating articles for deletion, and tonight I found that a certain "contributor" has uploaded more files that are almost certainly copyright violations, even though you have already given him a last warning. Here's his talk page: User talk:Northpoint777. He or she seems to have a serious COI with Matt Brouwer, based on the history of the article about one of the subject's albums. It's clearly an effort to promote an album on Wikipedia. Anyway, please check this user's recent contributions on Commons, and hopefully you will decide to block this contributor. Either way, thanks for your attention, and for your hard work. Dontreader (talk) 07:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done User blocked, files deleted. In future, you may ask on COM:AN. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. That's the worst case I've seen so far on Commons, although I'm still very new here. I didn't even know that there was an Administrators' noticeboard; I added that page to my useful links on my user page for the future. Anyway, thanks again for your quick action. Have a nice day! Dontreader (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reuploading photographs from SpaceX

Hi Yann

I saw your message on the undeletion requestion for images from SpaceX, I've tried reuploading them both through Flickr2Commons and also Upload Wizard but it gives me an error message saying they have been deleted. Could you tell me how I can reupload them?

Thanks

Mrjohncummings (talk) 22:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hezbollah Bandera.jpg

You delete this image. Why Is That? But this is also a flag like that..--samral ^talk 09:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Samral: Hi,

The flag of Hamas is too simple to get a copyright (only text), while this flag is complex. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Violations de copyright

Bonjour,
J'ai vu votre avertissement concernant une violation de copyright. Or il n'y a absolument AUCUNE violation de copyrights. Toutes les photos ont été importés avec l'accord de leurs propriétaires et je leur ai demandé d'écrire les mails pour l'OTRS et le photomontage « Sauvez la "Calypso" » a été fait avec une photo de Commons, comme ce montage.
Je me permets par exemple de vous faire remarquer que l'autorisation OTRS pour ce fichier a été envoyé le 12 mars 2015 et que la confirmation n'apparait toujours pas, 10 jours plus tard. Pour la photo du Caribe, le lien vers la page a été envoyé au photographe juste après que j'ai imorté l'image en lui demandant de faire un mail à l'OTRS.
Maintenant, je ne vois pas ce que je peux faire de plus... Envoyé une copie de chacun de mes mails à propos des images "volées" ou me faire bloquer de Wikipédia parce que les autorisations OTRS mettent plusieurs semaines à être confirmés???
Sur ce, bonne soirée. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 16:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lev. Anthony: Bonjour,

Désolé pour le retard, mais il y a toujours un délai assez long pour les autorisations OTRS. Il n'est pas rare d'attendre un mois. Pour éviter que les images soient supprimées, ajoutez le modèle {{OTRS pending}} dans le champ "permission" de vos images. Je vais regarder les autorisations en attente dès que possible. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
Je me permets de vous faire remarquer que pour l'image du Caribe, les 15 jours de délais n'ont absolument pas été respectés, l'image ayant été importé moins de six heures avant sa suppression. Par contre, j'aimerais savoir comment vous souhaitez que j'explique au photographe le fait qu'il ne trouve pas la photo au lien indiqué. Comme le fait que je suis "stupide" au point de lui envoyer un faux lien ou vous avez une autre idée???
Par contre, je pense que je vais me contenter de quitter les projets de Wikipédia parce que les différents messages que je reçois commence vraiment à m'énerver. Je ne suis pas là pour recevoir des menaces mais pour essayer d'améliorer cette encyclopédie (je me retiens de mettre des adjectifs afin de ne pas être vulgaire). Il suffit de regarder ma page de discussion pour voir les suppressions d'images importé pour la majorité avec autorisation...
Malgré tout, bonne soirée. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lev. Anthony: Cela ne sert à rien de vous énerver. Nous sommes tous volontaires ici. Nous faisons notre possible pour améliorer les projets, chacun avec le temps dont il dispose et les meilleures volontés. Je vous ferais quand même remarquer que vous avez beaucoup d'avertissements pour violations de droits d'auteur sur votre page. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lev. Anthony: J'ai ajouté une autorisation à deux de vos fichiers, et j'ai renvoyé un mail demandant une autorisation complète. J'ai aussi restauré File:Sauvons la "Calypso".JPG. Pour le reste, je vous demande encore une fois d'être patient. Une vingtaine d'admins sur Commons fait l'essentiel du travail de supervision sur plus de 10.000 fichiers importés chaque jour, dont plus de 1000 sont supprimés pour violation de droits d'auteur ou par manque d'autorisation. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
Effectivement, je me suis un peu emballé tout à l’heure et je m’en excuse. J'ai été énervé par le fait qu'on me menace de bloquer mon compte à cause de violations de copyrights qui n'en sont pas en réalité, les demandes OTRS étant en cours.
Pour les violations de copyrights de ma page de discussion, toutes celles datées du 27 septembre 2013 et après n'en sont pas (exceptés les montages et le fichier MV Batillus à Antifer, qui était la photo d'un livre), les demandes ayant été faites aux photographes (j'ai encore les mails dans ma boite électronique), mais je ne voulais pas déranger les photographes avec des demandes OTRS et car je m'étais fait engueulé par uin administrateur du site sur lequel j'avais fait les demandes et qui ne comprenait pas l’intérêt d'illustrer Wikipédia... Comme vous l’avez surement constaté par vous même en me renvoyant le mail, les neuf fichiers menacés de suppression (de File:"Costa Allegra" - Genoa, 1992.jpg à file:"Al-Salam Boccacio 98" - Genoa, 2001.jpg sur ma page de discussion) sont en réalité importés avec autorisation. Pour le fichier du Mardi Gras, j'ai demandé au propriétaire d’envoyer un mail à l’OTRS, mais je ne sais pas si il s'en ai occupé.
Bonne soirée --Lev. Anthony (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lev. Anthony: Bonjour,

J'ai répondu à l'auteur pour Mardi Gras, et je lui ai demandé de renvoyer l'autorisation qui n'était pas complète. Comme je vous l'ai dis plus haut, pour toutes les images avec une autorisation en attente, vous devriez ajoutez le modèle {{OTRS pending}} dans le champ "permission" pour être sûr qu'elles ne soient pas supprimées. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
Je penserais à ce modèle pour les prochaines fois.
Désolé de vous contredire, mais la personne à qui vous avez répondu est Carlo Martinelli, qui est l'auteur des neuf autres photos. L'auteur du fichier Mardi Gras s'appelle René Beauchamp. Il me semble qu'il n'a pas encore fait de demande OTRS, mais je me trompe peut etre.
Bonne soirée. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 23:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, mais j'ai aussi répondu à René Beauchamp. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
En effet, René Beauchamp m'a transféré le mail quelques minutes plus tard.
Par contre, l’utilisateur @Denniss: a supprimé trois de mes fichiers qui étaient en attente d'OTRS et dont l’import était fait avec autorisation de l'auteur. Est-il possible de les restaurer? Il s'agit de ces fichiers :

Merci d'avance. Bonne soirée --Lev. Anthony (talk) 17:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian University Image uploads

I don't understand how the images on the page I edited can be copyright violated when they are all from my organization? The University asked me to upload these photos which belong solely to the University itself. Some of the artwork such as the new logo that was uploaded was created by me for the University and belongs solely to the University with approval from the Management heads of the University. So how could it violate copyright?

--AsianU (talk) 02:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AsianU: Hi,

As Fastily told you here, for all documents previously published such as logos, we required a formal written permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, So where would I send a formal written request to? Would that have to be from the President or from myself? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsianU (talk • contribs)

@AsianU: Hi,

The permission should be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. It has to come from the President of the University or the person in charge of legal matters. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please

Please see User talk:Laumari#RE: Marcado de derecho de autor en mis fotos (in spanish). Thenk. --Jcfidy (talk) 13:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Authorities CPS 2012.jpg

Hi Yann, please restore that file. All of the portraits used on it are my own work. Diego Grez ^{return fire} 19:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Diego Grez: Hi,

This is a montage and there is no source for this file. So please either upload the original images with EXIF data, or send a permission through COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploading

Hellow sir,

I saw ur Warning on my talk page, and im really for uploading such files. But sir, i need to upload some images which found on a specific website and is image of an Actress. How do i upload this file on wiki, i need to know the licencing issues. The image i uploaded was also from websites. Kindly, waiting for your reply, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roshan014 (talk • contribs)

@Roshan014: Hi,

You are not allowed to upload on Commons images made by others unless you have a permission from the copyright owner (usually the photographer). Please see COM:OTRS for sending the permission if you have one. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for yor response. So can i upload a Screenshot of a TV Programme? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Roshan014 (talk • contribs)

@Roshan014: Off-topic, but please sign your talk page messages by typing ~~~~ at the end. Thanks. Revent (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. The copyright of the screenshot of a TV programme is owned by the TV channel, not by you. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Document du 1er février 1914

Bonjour Yann, j'ai une photocopie de la Revue des eaux et forêts du 1er février 1914 pages 97 à 99. je ne retrouve pas l'originale sur internet (Gallica BNF, Google...), puis-je mettre ces pages sur wikimedia commons?

Je ne sais pas si vous avez une réponse pour Paul Zinsli, je crois que je vais reprendre votre mail en allemand pour Barbara (Suisse allemande) qui est l'héritière du photographe. Merci d'avance, --Amage9 (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Amage9: Bonjour,

Ça dépend. L'éditeur de cette revue était Lucien Laveur en 1911 [1]. Est-il mort depuis plus de 70 ans ? Les articles signés sont sous droits d'auteur jusqu'à 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur. Pour les autres, 70 ans après publication, donc OK.

A noter que Gallica donne des infos fausses. Le rédacteur en chef en 1911 ne pouvait pas ête Aristide Frézard, celui-ci étant mort en 1862 [2].

Pour les recherches complexes de ce type, vous pouvez demander à Hélène Sarrazin. C'est une pro. ;oD Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:26, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour cette analyse et axes de recherche.

Cordialement,

--Amage9 (talk) 20:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Supression de photos

Salut Yann, concernant Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Tinss, il semblerait que certaines des photos aient été supprimées de nouveau malgré la réception du ticket OTRS. Peux-tu m'éclairer sur la raison? Tinss (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tinss: Bonjour,

Jim pense que tu ne possèdes pas les droits sur ces images, vu que tu ne connais pas le nom des photographes. Formellement, les droits ne peuvent se transférer que par un accord écrit. Désolé. Tu peux lui répondre en français ici, Google traduira. L'une est acceptable, car dans le domaine public au Canada par l'âge. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq

File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg pictures belong to me. Picture 2 is the second part of the first letter. These letters have been sent to me by "İçərişəhər" rule is allowed.--samral ^talk 13:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Samral: Hi,

The pictures belong to you, but the copyright belongs to İçərişəhər. We need a permission from him/her. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Also I am not sure this is in COM:SCOPE. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Letter to be sent to me deyil means that its copyrights belong to me? My name goes even contains.--samral ^talk 13:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Samral: Hi,

It doesn't matter what the letter contains. The copyright always belongs to the person who wrote it. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The text in that picture already given permission to use the picture of me in Vikipedya administration that governed by the "İçərişəhər".--samral ^talk 19:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging copyvios

Sure, I will notice the uploader. I'm not experienced at Commons, thanks for information. -- Supermæn (talk) 05:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Supermæn: I suggest using the "AjaxQuickDelete" gadget, which will make the appropriate edits to user talk pages when nominating a file for deletion. It's under the "Maintenance Tools" section of the gadgets tab of preferences. Revent (talk) 00:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foto's Jaap Rus

Dear Yann, thank you for your help with the foto's uploading. De fdoto Jaap Rus 1945 is from the album, i.e. the private collection of Jaap Rus himself. It is made in 1945 and the photgraphar can not been find anymore.

The foto Jaap Rus 2014 is mae bij a photographer Mechteld Jansen. She gaves me permission to place the foto in EWikipedia. This is her e-mail (in Ducth) wich say: 'you can use it': Op 17 mrt. 2015 om 10:17 heeft Forum Fotografie - Mechteld Jansen <mechteld@forumfotografie.nl> het volgende geschreven: Hoi,

Gebruik hem maar, dat is akkoord.. Auteursrechten > je hebt toestemming nodig van de fotograaf anders kun je aangeklaagd worden :-)

Groeten Mechteld

Forum Fotografie - Mechteld Jansen

The foto 'Jaap Rus voor de kering' is made by a photographer Lex de Meester. We just ask him permission. De newspaper PZC where both foto's were published says the rights are at the photograpfers.

The Canadees insigne, the erepenning and the Officier Orde van O-N: we don't want to place them anymore and theu can be removes form wiki commons.

I hope this all is sufficient. thank you so much for your helpo. Carla Rus (talk) 06:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Carla Rus: Hi,

Old photos can't be "own work". You have to give more information: who is the photographer, when the picture was taken, and where it was first published, or that it was published without a mention of the author (in that case, it will be in public domain 70 years after publication, i.e. if published in 1945, it will in the public domain on 1st January 2016). Regards, Yann (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, Mr Rus doesn't know who was the photographer at all. This photo wasn't published anywhere. But if this isn't eno7ugh we have to wait until January '16. We are contacting both photographers of the other photo's for the right CC BY-SA license. Thank you. CarlaCarla Rus (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, may be the photo Jaap Rus 1945 is not made in 1945 after all, but in December 1944, just after the end of de war in Zeeland in 8 November 1944. We're trying to find out this for sure in the photo-album of my dad Mr Jaap Rus. gr. Carla Rus (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, I found out indeed that the photo Jaap Rus 1945 actually is made in December 1944. The photo never is published, it is in a private collection. So now it is in the public domain, if I understood you well. So, would you please accept the photo for WikiCommons? Thank you very much for your help. Carla Rus (talk) 14:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Carla Rus: The template {{PD-EU-unpublished}} might apply, though it depends on the specifics of Netherlands law. I have not looked at the particular photo, but if it was indeed never published for 70 years after creation, and the creator is anonymous, then it should be PD with a (according to the EU standard) possible 25 year publication right for the first publisher. That would allow it to be published on Commons with an explicit waiver of copyright (i.e. publishing on Commons with a statement that it is PD). Revent (talk) 00:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the undeletion of the file IRNSS-1D CleanRoom and others

Hello, I think you have mistaken the file for a copyright violation but the file is freely available on ISRO public website for multiple public use. So, kindly plese undelete the file or please state the violation terms violated if not so. Prymshbmg (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prymshbmg: Hi,

Files from ISRO are not in the public domain or under a free license. Only available under fair use, for education, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Publishing in 'Wikipedia' is an educational use, and kindly please do not fighten me by copyright violation, i didn't do anything rash knowingly you could contact me before deleting them, I would have deleted them myself. But I think wikipedia is an educational website so we can use these images for free please consider it as, there is no objection from ISRO for using these images in wikipedia. Thank for your response in advance. Prymshbmg (talk) 05:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prymshbmg: Hi,

Sorry, but no. We need a complete permission to publish for any use, including commercial. Please read COM:L. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But, please you could remove the warning and please dont block me from editing as I'm working on some projects related to my country. Prymshbmg (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prymshbmg: Hi,

OK, fine. I am also a bit from India. ;oD Thanks for your contributions. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removal of charges and warning, keep editing and guiding. Jai Hind.Prymshbmg (talk) 09:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops!

Hello. I enjoy uploading images for Wikipedia. However, not knowing that they were actually copyrighted, I have uploaded Google Earth images and tagged them as "free"; however, they were pulled down against my will for copyright issues. I didn't know that Google Earth images were copyrighted. WHOOPS! *face-palming* How would it be if I had uploaded the same images BUT show in their information who the copyright-holder is, or would it be unacceptable since we (although it would be frustrating, considering that we would travel to these places and take pictures ourselves) could find/take free images?

I am really sorry for my naiveté. I feel foolish for being silly. Gamingforfun365 (talk) 18:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To Admin Yan and all concerned administration of Wikipedia,

Am still on Wikipedia tutorials and I thank you for sending your reviews. I wish to request for an appeal if you may kindly fully restore are user page, so I may have a chance to remedy the errors...

yours truly,

WCH- Volunteer staff — Preceding unsigned comment added by H.H Princess Maria Amor (talk • contribs)

Comment Some Google Earth images are not actually copyrighted, though most are. If you create a Google Map Maker account, you can see the specific sourcing for a particular image... some regions and zoom levels are covered by PD imagery such as Landsat (PD-NASA) or photos from the US Department of Agriculture. Revent (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

thanks for your guidance but please remove any charges for violation over me. Prymshbmg (talk) 09:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Paul Zinsli

Bonjour Yann, avant d'importer la photo du Pr Zinsli sur wikimedia commons, pouvez-vous me dire à partir du mail que je viens d'envoyer à <permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org> si c'est OK.

Merci d'avance. Bonne soirée, --Amage9 (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Je vous ai répondu. Voir ticket:2015032510025518. Yann (talk) 21:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann,

j'ai obtenu d'autres photos de Paul Zinsli en attendant l'autorisation de l'Université de Berne. Ce sont des photos familiales transmises par son fils Paul-Erich Zinsli.

Le mail d'autorisation a été envoyé à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org.

Bien cordialement,

--Amage9 (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if you double check the French I added?

Yann,

I added some French to Template:Israel Airports Authority. Is it okay if you double check it?

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: Hi,

As I understand, French translations are only added when they differ from English. So it seems OK to me. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) WhisperToMe (talk) 21:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COM:VP

I think you're just misusing your rollback button for restoring obvious personal attacks. If you think you can play those little power games with me, you're wrong. Any further edit of this kind will bring the issue to COM:ANU. Thanks. --A.Savin 21:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Odder is just trolling Philippe. Sad to see you supporting this. :( Yann (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is just your personal opinion. Btw, I'm not supporting anything. But such inflammatory comments have nothing to seek on VP. --A.Savin 21:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an opinion shared by quite a number of people. And you are just plain wrong, seeing James' answer on Philippe's talk page. *sigh* Hopefully there are a few sain people left here, and thanks to Fastily for closing this unwanted drama. Yann (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

problème de licence/visuels Henry Déziré (suite)

Bonsoir Vous m'avez déjà aidée, et je fais donc appel à vous à nouveau pour la suite de la résolution des problèmes de licence des visuels que je voudrais inclure dans la page Wikipedia écrite sur mon grand-père Henry Déziré. Je ne sais pas quel est le meilleur moyen de vous contacter, alors en plus du mail que j'ai écrit (en réponse au vôtre) je copie le mail ici: Bonsoir, Je crois avoir fait tout ce qui était dans mes capacités: - j'ai modifié les fiches de photos en m'inspirant du modèle que vous m'avez donné (Tête de Bretonne au ruban rouge): dates, auteurs, categories, types de licence, quand je le savais - j'ai contacté les musées et le photographe, et ai obtenu des réponses que je vous joins en pj Voici donc un envoi accompagné de - un document 3 pages avec la liste des images et les réponses obtenues en ce qui concerne les droits - l'autorisation du Musée du Faouët (M. le Maire du Faouët) - l'autorisation du musée de Guéret (Mme Guinois) - la réponse de Mme Favreau pour les Musées de La Rochelle - l'autorisation du musée de Saint Etienne Métropole - qui se trompe dans le prénom, puisque le prénom de mon grand-père est Henry et non André! - l'autorisation du Musée de Saint Quentin En espérant que tout sera en ordre pour obtenir les tickets et le droit d'utiliser les photos sur Wikimedia et Wikipedia. Vous me direz aussi si j'ai autre chose à faire. Merci encore de votre précieuse aide

Les pièces jointes accompagnent le mail, je ne peux pas les joindre ici…

Une dernière chose: pour les licences, j'ai vu qu'il y avait deux cas: un cas avec {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}} que vous avez utilisé pour le tableau du musée de La Rochelle, et un cas avec self en plus. Pouvez-vous me dire la différence?

Je renouvelle mes remerciements en tout cas--Araynaudreversat (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Araynaudreversat: Bonjour,

J'ai ajouté l'autorisation sur toutes les pages de description, exceptée File:Henry Déziré, Port de la Rochelle (vers 1940), Musée d'Art Moderne de Saint-Etienne Métropole.jpg, car le musée demande que l'on note "(c) Tous droits réservés", ce qui et incompatible avec une licence libre. Je vous répondrais par mail pour les détails et les suites possibles sur ce cas.

J'aime particulièrement File:Henry Déziré, Tête de Bretonne au ruban rouge (avant 1913), Musées d'Art et d'Histoire de La Rochelle, cliché Max Roy.jpg, et la photo est d'excellente qualité, aussi je l'ai proposée comme image remarquable.

Merci d'avoir importé ces images et d'enrichir Wikimedia Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Un Immense MERCI pour votre rapidité et votre efficacité. Je suis vraiment ravie, et vais ajouter les photos à l'article, sauf effectivement celle du musée de Saint Etienne: ce n'est pas grave, d'ailleurs, car j'ai la photo d'un autre tableau (de ma collection) à mettre à la place! --Araynaudreversat (talk) 13:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, Je vous ai fait parvenir par mail du 30 mars l'autorisation du musée de Saint Etienne (mail envoyé par Mme Granger le 30 mars à 10:04) J'espère qu'il n'y a plus de problème et que vous allez être autorisé - et moi donc par là-même - à publier cette photo et à l'inclure dans l'article. Merci de votre réponse--Araynaudreversat (talk) 20:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Thuillier

Concerne ces logos.

Hello Yann, je suis un peu troublé par ta clôture des pages de suppression de ces logos. Bien entendu, je suis d'accord avec toi sur le principe qu'un dépôt de marque ne confère pas un droit d'auteur. Mais l'argument que j'avais avancé pour la suppression n'est pas traité par cette considération. En effet, j'avais proposé la suppression non parce qu'il s'agit d'une marque déposée, mais parce qu'il s'agit d'une marque semi-figurative, incluant un élément graphique (le T calligraphique) caractéristique et situé au dessus du "seuil d'originalité", eu égard notamment à la jurisprudence française en matière de protection du droit d'auteur. Par ailleurs, je trouve la licence de ces images problématique : soit on considère que c'est seulement du texte et qu'il n'y a aucun droit patrimonial sur l'image (i.e. PD text et non CC-BY-SA), soit on considère qu'il existe un droit patrimonial, qui doit alors revenir au propriétaire de la marque, Didier Thuillier, et non au téléverseur, lequel n'a pas établi qu'il avait l'autorisation du déposant, autrement dit que c'est au seul Didier Thuillier qu'il appartient, s'il le souhaite, de mettre cette image dans le domaine public. Cordialement, — Racconish^📥 09:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Bonjour,

A mon avis, ces fichiers devraient être sous {{PD-textlogo}}. Dans ces DRs, tu ne donnes pas de références prouvant qu'il pourrait y avoir un droit d'auteur. Une simple lettre ne peut à mon avis être suffisamment originale pour donner lieu à un droit d'auteur. Je ne trouve pas de copie sur le Net, aussi je suppose que Chadi Srour les a recréés. Dans ce cas, Carl Lindberg pense qu'il faut quand même garder la licence donnée par le recréateur, même si le logo est très simple. Personnellement, je ne comprends pas cet argument. Voir la discussion sur Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Are Creative Commons icons in public domain?. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci de ta réponse. Il me semblait que le dépôt de marque, accessible sur le site de l'INPI en tapant 'Thuillier' et résumé dans le lien que j'ai donné dans la discussion de suppression, suffisait à établir la présomption que Didier Thuillier, le déposant, est aussi le créateur. Je peux très bien comprendre qu'on estime qu'il s'agit d'une image en dessous du seuil d'originalité. De mon côté, eu égard au fait qu'il s'agit d'un auteur français et que la jurisprudence française est très protectrice, j'aurais eu tendance à appliquer le principe de précaution. Cordialement, — Racconish^📥 10:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Le principe de précaution n'est pas un substitut à une analyse sérieuse. L'utiliser dans ce cas est un abus à mon avis. En fait, la jurisprudence française est ambivalente. Elle est stricte dans certains cas, mais elle accepte de nombreuses exceptions au droit d'auteur. Par contre, je suis d'accord qu'il faut ajouter Didier Thuillier comme créateur, pour respecter son droit moral inaliénable. Par ailleurs, nous avions déjà deux logos de cette marque, et il faudrait ajouter des catégories. Ce n'est pas utile d'avoir autant de copies du même logo. Il ne faudrait garder que les formats SVG. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vithun Ravindran

I got photographer Vithun Ravindran to mail OTRS his consent about using his image (the full image was uploaded as File:RJ Balaji Hiphop Tamizha Adhi.jpg, and it was cropped into File:RJ Balaji Music Academy 2013.jpg), yet the cropped image was deleted while the original remains. Can you please explain what more I could have done to stop the deletion? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I deleted the other one too. If you have a permission, please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You did not get the point. The photographer has mailed OTRS his consent to use all the images on his website, the mail follows this format. So, as an OTRS member, please find the mail, approve it and restore the images. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answered, see ticket:2014022510017601 and ticket:2015031610020585. Yann (talk) 21:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which account do I log in with? My Wiki_edia account is not being accepted there. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: The tickets there are only available to OTRS volunteers. Sorry if I was not clear. You should have got a a mail. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So what finally? Does the image stay or not? Because I cannot view those pages you linked, and I thought I followed the required criteria by getting the photographer to mail his consent. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Hi,

In your permission, you didn't specifiy the list of pictures, or confirm that you are using this account. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Créer une page Wikimedia Commons sur Henry Déziré?

Bonjour,

Maintenant, quand on arrive à la fin de la page Wikipedia sur Henry Déziré, on a un logo qui envoie vers Wikimedia Commons. Il faut alors entrer le nom de Henry Déziré dans la boîte de recherche, ce qui est moins simple qu'avant. Il me semble qu'hier encore, si on cliquait sur le logo en bas de page, on arrivait directement aux reproductions de tableaux.

En clqiuant sur le logo de bas de page Wikipedia, on arrive à la proposition de créer une page, et je ne sais pas comment faire.

Il y a un problème de titre, de toute façon, on me propose de créer une page Henri Déziré et non Henry (ce qui est la bonne orthographe).

Merci de votre aide.

PS Il reste en suspens votre autorisation pour la publication de la reproduction du tableau du Musée de Saint Etienne: Madame Granger m'a envoyé un mail tout à fait clair, il n'y a pas de problèmes de droits, je vous ai fait suivre ce mail sur l'adresse mail utilisée auparavant. Merci pour cela aussi.

--Araynaudreversat (talk) 21:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Araynaudreversat: Bonjour,

J'ai modifié le lien sur Wikipédia pour qu'il pointe sur la catégorie. Il est possible de créer une page Henry Déziré, et cela pourrait être utile pour classer ses œuvres par ordre chronologique. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour le lien, c'est beaucoup mieux. Je ferai pour la page plus tard. Bon week-end de Pâques--Araynaudreversat (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

licence photo du musée de Saint Etienne (tableau Henry Déziré)

Bonjour, Je vois que la licence de la photo du tableau Port de la Rochelle - Musée de Saint Etienne Métropole - n'est pas modifiée, or je vous ai adressé le mail de Mme Evelyne Granger qui clarifie tout: c'est à dire l'absence de droits. Pouvez-vous "libérer cette photo pour que je puisse l'utiliser? Merci beaucoup, et bon week-end de Pâques--Araynaudreversat (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fait Yann (talk) 10:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Paul Zinsli

Bonjour Yann, désolé de vous resolliciter mais je vous avais répondu le 31 mars pour la photo de Paul Zinsli : "j'ai obtenu d'autres photos de Paul Zinsli en attendant l'autorisation de l'Université de Berne. Ce sont des photos familiales transmises par son fils Paul-Erich Zinsli. Le mail d'autorisation a été envoyé à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org." Le mail a été envoyé directement à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org par Paul-Erich Zinsli avec le formulaire d'autorisation pour une licence Creative Commons BY-SA-3.0. Pouvez-vous me dire si vous retrouvez bien ce mail d'autorisation? Merci d'avance. Bien cordialement, --Amage9 (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann,

Yann is occupied as god? Je suis vraiment ennuyé je n'ai aucune réponse que ce soit de User talk:EugeneZelenko en français ou en anglais ou de Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard conseillé par Eugène.

Le mail de Paul-Erich Zinsli ayant droit de son père Paul Zinsli a bien été envoyé par lui-même à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org le 23 mars avec licence Creative Commons BY-SA-3.0.

Merci d'avance.

Bien cordialement,

--Amage9 (talk) 11:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation

Hi Yann, My name is Raffi Tchakerian, iam one of the the team members of the Warka Water project, and author of the images i uploaded, how can we solve the matter? Thanks Cheers Raf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raffitch (talk • contribs)

@Raffitch: Hi,

As your files were previously published on the Internet, you need to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios floraiberica.com ?

File:Charpin.jpg

File:Lopez udias.jpg

File:Magnus Lidén.jpg

Hi, Yann

All contents under the domains floraiberica.com or anthos.es are subject to a statutory license, as is stated in the page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/es/

Esta licencia, en síntesis, establece que: Usted es libre de copiar, distribuir y comunicar públicamente el contenido de las páginas y de hacer obras derivadas, bajo las siguientes condiciones:

Debe reconocer y citar al autor original. No puede utilizar esta obra para fines comerciales Si altera o transforma esta obra, o genera una obra derivada, sólo puede distribuir la obra generada bajo una licencia idéntica a ésta. El Secretariado de Flora iberica no se responsabiliza, en ningún caso, del uso que se dé a estos datos expuestos en su servidor web.

El uso de los datos contenidos en nuestro servidor obliga a reconocer y citar su uso explícitamente, de la siguiente manera:

Flora iberica, [página o recurso consultado], [fecha en la que fue consultado el recurso]

This license, in brief that: You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the content of the pages and make derivative works under the following conditions:

You must give the original author. You may not use this work for commercial purposes If you alter, transform this work or creates a derivative work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this. The Secretariat of Flora iberica not responsible, in any case, the use to which these data presented on your web server.

Use of the information in our server requires recognition and explicitly mention their use, as follows:

Flora iberica, [page or resource consulted], [date that was consulted on resource]

Rosarinagazo (talk) 02:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios CURRICULO LATTES ?

Hi, Yann

http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/

http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9610.htm

Presidência da República - Casa Civil

Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos

LEI Nº 9.610, DE 19 DE FEVEREIRO DE 1998

Art. 8 are not subject to protection as copyright in this law:

I - the ideas, normative procedures, systems, methods, projects or mathematical concepts as such;

II - schemes, plans or rules for performing mental acts, playing games or business;

III - blank forms to be filled by any type of information, scientific or otherwise, and instructions;

IV - the texts of treaties or conventions, laws, decrees, regulations, judicial decisions and other official acts;

V - the common use of information such as calendars, diaries, registers or legends;

VI - the names and titles isolated;

VII - the industrial or commercial exploitation of the ideas contained in the works.

Art. 9. The copy of a work of art made by the author is assured the same protection enjoyed by the original.

Art. 10. The protection of intellectual work includes its title, if original and unmistakable with the same kind of work, disclosed earlier by another author.

Sole paragraph. The title of periodicals, including newspapers, is protected up to a year after the departure of its latest issue, unless they are annual, in which case this period will amount to two years. Rosarinagazo (talk) 02:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosarinagazo: Hi,

Sorry, I don't spealk Portuguese. The license BY-NC-SA is not sufficient. All files on Commons have to be available for any uses, including commercial ones. Please read COM:L (in Portuguese Commons:Licensing/pt and File:BD-propagande-2 (pt).png). I am quite sure that photographs have a copyright, even if it is not mentioned on the website. You could get a permission from authors. Please see COM:OTRS/pt for the procedure. You may find help in Portuguese on Commons:Esplanada. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prematurely closing deletion discussions...

Yann,

I've reverted your early close of a deletion discussion, as the debate was still continuing as of yesterday and today, and was beginning to draw out some common ground. Deletion discussions should only be closed when a consensus is reached, or when it is clear that no consensus will emerge, not half-way through a live debate. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-Block

My account was compromised during my absence - please enable an indefinite block to prevent further damage to wiki projects. Thanks for collaborating. --BScMScMD (talk) 19:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting pages

Hi there! I was wondering why you deleted the pages I created for Camanche Dam, Mokelumne River Fish Hatchery , and the Pardee Dam? Did I make a mistake? Thanks for any input! --Samantha (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Samantha (Wiki Ed): Hi,

These pages were empty, and I think you intended to create categories, but created galleries instead. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ganesh statue, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.jpg

Good morning Yann. I am helping Rajan Jaisinghani write a book titled "Homo Sapiens--An Appraisal of Modern Humans." The book examines why we continue to damage our planet, encompassing man's collective behavior, economics, governance and politics, philosophy and education, and so much more, and offers some ways we might begin to change our behavior and lessen our damage. We'd be happy to send you more details. We would like to include your image of Ganesh; might you be able to provide a higher resolution image? It can be found at File:Ganesh statue, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.jpg. I can be reached at amanda@technovation.org or 804-744-0604 (USA). Thank you.

Amanda France

Hi,

Sorry, I don't have a bigger version. PLease credit as "Yann Forget, CC-BY-SA". Regards, Yann (talk) 16:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Paul Zinsli

Bonjour Yann, je ne sais pas si vous avez pu étudier les différents messages que je vous ai envoyé au sujet des photos Zinsli transmises par Paul-Erich Zinsli, fils de Paul Zinsli et ayant-droit. Paul-Erich Zinsli a envoyé le 23 mars at 11:01 pm (GMT) un mail à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org avec la license Creative Commons BY-SA-3.0 pour les trois fichiers : DrPaulZinsli1, DrPaulZinsli2, DrPaulZinsliPeint. EugeneZelenko m'a conseillé de vous joindre car il ne pratique pas le français, en attendant il a restauré les dates des fichiers. Merci d'avance. Bien cordialement, --Amage9 (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request - more videos

Hello Yann, yesterday I requested for deletion of my videos which were copies in low resolution. I made a list in a file: File:Fort_VIIa_reconstruction_Poznań_Poland_180x108.webm. Please take a look at the whole list and delete them. Moreover you gave me "violation copy" warning which is misunderstanding. I understand that you are working very fast. Best regards, Klapi (talk) 09:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The list for deletion is:

Thanks, Klapi (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Klapi: Hi,

I am deleting the ones not used. For the others, you need to replace it. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Hello again,

I replaced video with better quality one, so it's not used any more. You can delete it now: File:Lech Poznań Stary Rynek przejazd 2010-190px.ogv. Thanks for help. Klapi (talk) 11:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Youra Livchitz (1917-1944).jpg

Bonjour,

J'ai vu la discussion concernant cette image. Les règles de Commons, un peu trop strictes à mon goût, demandent que l'on connaissent qui est l'auteur et où la photo a-t-elle été publiée la première fois. Autant on peut raisonnablement argumenter que l'auteur est anonyme, mais il est possible qu'elle n'a jamais été publié à l'époque. Il serait aussi possible d'obtenir plus d'infos de la part des Ghetto Fighters’ House Archives, où plusieurs photos sont disponibles : [3], [4]. J'espère que ça peut aider. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci. Toute aide est la bienvenue. N'hésite pas à déposer ton avis Ici. --Madelgarius (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Madelgarius: Tu peux répondre sur ta page de discussion si tu ajoutes {{ping|Yann}}. Je ne vais pas répondre sur la demande de restauration à moins d'avoir de nouveaux éléments à apporter. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Même sans élément nouveau, si deux cloches sonnent du même timbre, cela fera vite un carillon... ding, ding, ;-) --Madelgarius (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Madelgarius: Relis ce que j'ai écris plus haut. Il faudrait au moins montrer que la photo a été publiée il y a plus de 70 ans. PS: le ping est nécessaire seulement sur une autre page que la mienne. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:34, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mouais, on n'est pas rendu... --Madelgarius (talk) 19:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Madelgarius: Je sais que c'est difficile, c'est pourquoi je proposais de demander à Ghetto Fighters’ House Archives. J'importe pas mal de documents externes, mais je fais attention à ce que toutes les infos soient fournies, pour ne pas tomber sous le coup des personnes pointilleuses sur le droit d'auteur. cf. Special:ListFiles/Yann. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pour moi, c'est de l'hébreu ;-) mais si tu penses qu'il y a une opportunité là, je te donne carte blanche ;-) Bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 19:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Here's a barnstar for bringing encouraging aid to a frustrated user. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why you delete the photographs?

Dear Sir/Madam

After a long, hard & rigorous efforts, I have taken the photographs of Kali Bari Chhindwara and uploaded these photographs in Wikipedia file (Kali Bari Chhindwara) through wikimedia commons. But you have deleted all the files from wikimedia with comment- 17:08, 11 April 2015 Yann (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Kali Bari Chhindwara.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) (global usage; delinker log).

Sir/Madam May I know in what manner I have violated the copyrights.

Atleast who should inform to me, before deleting the files.

Awaiting your positive reply

Thanks & Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dutta1sandy (talk • contribs)

@Dutta1sandy: Hi,

The files you uploaded are not your own works, therefore you need a permission from the copyright owner (usually the photographer) before importing them here. Please see COM:OTRS for details. This is also the case for files previously published elsewhere, even if they are your own. The files can be restored after the permission is received. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Phony photo of an alleged lynching

Regarding File:Horse thief hanging.png, the reason for my requested deletion is Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. This is obviously a group of cowboys having fun with a straw dummy strung over a crossbar. For examples of real dead people at the end of a rope, go to Lynching. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is in use, so there is no reason to delete it. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:03, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That recent KEEP

Hiya! Please take a look at the gallery from which File:Türkischrotfärberei und -Druckerei J.J.Kelly, Mettendorf, Gossau SG, Aquarell von Elisabeth Kelly, um 1850.JPG was extracted. I think we should at least fix these - or educate the user to change them - if they're kept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file

Hi, Yann! You deleted File:UNEM logo Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica.jpg at my request (thank you!). There's an OTRS ticket associated with it, #2014121710021423. I don't believe the file should be undeleted - please see the long discussions over the true domain for this institution at w:Talk:Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica – but would ask you to do what you think best. Could I ask you also to look at the other file mentioned in that mail, File:Copyright Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica.jpg; that is clearly PD, a US .gov publication; does the OTRS ticket need to be recorded there? Many thanks for your help, I'm a total newbie here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Projet Poirier

Bonjour,

Je vois que je ne suis pas le seul à venir pour une suppression.

Les deux conservations que vous avez jugées ici et ici frôlent l'absurde. D'autres cas de doublons sont répertoriés. Il faut avoir une discussion avec Asclepias et Benoit Rochon sur la conduite à suivre mais il était acquis dans notre discussion qu'il n'est pas souhaitable que ces images demeurent en double sur Commons. Là, les excuses tâtillones, on va laisser ça de côté. Louperivois Ψ @ 00:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Etant donné que je suis un des admins les plus actifs ici, ce n'est pas surprenant que j'ai des messages sur ma page de discussion. D'habitude, on me reproche des suppressions, pas de garder les images. C'est donc plutôt positif. Mais les remarques sarcastiques n'apportent rien... Yann (talk) 11:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ça n'a rien de personnel. Le fait qu'un doublon soit utilisé par une simple page est assez faible comme motif de conservation. Et qu'elle ait été recadrée de 3 pixels aussi. Louperivois Ψ @ 20:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A QUESTION

Is This vandalism?Anningia (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anningia: Hi,

What do you mean? Are you asking about the request for deletion, or the removal of the tag? A reason certainly needs to be given, and a speedy does not seem to be appropriate here. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

not sure,but I found some images on a blog which doesn't seem to belong to the uploader--Anningia (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anningia: Hi,

Which blog? which images? Could you be more precise please? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://didunculus.blogspot.com/p/illustrations_2.html?m=1 .also could you please stop doing the thing that makes my name come up in the notifications?Anningia (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nah,I don't think the uploads of funkmonk are copyvios,but many images uploaded by user:ArthurWeasely appear to be copyvios. Anningia 12:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sig is still a bit glitchy,but much shorter now. Anningia 05:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why do you stick your nose into my business about it?its almost like you get paid to do this! Anningia t@lk to me 11:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept image

I'm was surprised you kept this image Commons:Deletion requests/File:Soltam M-71-68 Armada de Chile.jpg considering there is no evidence of permission. The source provided does not support the licence and the actual image source cannot be found. I'd like some insight on this one please. Ww2censor (talk) 13:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I didn't check the license, I just saw Didym's comment, but you are right. I will let someone reading Spanish closing this. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Basic Income, a new human right.webm

Hi Yann, you've been too fast :-) I had the chance to verify Palu's claims and s/he was right. There was a CC-BY-SA at the end of the video footage. IMHO it should be enough. Was it an error or I'm missing anything? Best regards --Discasto _talk 14:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, restored. Yann (talk) 14:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) --Discasto _talk 15:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC) PS: I've included a clarification[reply]

Fichiers Paul Zinsli

Bonjour Yann, vraiment vraiment désolé mais je ne sais plus à quel saint me vouer. Malgré mes multiples messages et renvoi du mail de Paul-Erich Zinsli, fils de Paul et ayant-droit, à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org avec le formulaire pour la licence Creative Commons BY-SA-3.0 (fichiers DrPaulZinsli1, DrPaulZinsli2, DrPaulZinsliPeint) je n'ai pas de réponse et le délai arrive à expiration demain. Pouvez-vous faire quelque chose. Vraiment désolé de vous resolliciter après le temps que vous avez déjà consacré à d'autres fichiers de mes contributions. Bien cordialement, --Amage9 (talk) 15:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello Yan

I received a warning from you about the alleged copyright violations. The deletion nomination of several of my uploaded files came to my attention recently when I checked wikimedia. It would be nice if you stalled it down a little since the issue is being contained and I generaly do agree with the complaints and getting myself into the guidelines, specificaly affecting photos. Most of those nominations that got deleted had upload and validation issues and not copyright issues per se. I won't be that careless in the future but please refrain from such direct threats. Thank you.

Sincerely and with best regards TheMightyGeneral (talk) 22:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

大量の削除について

以前から投稿していて、これまで数年間、なんの問題の指摘もなかった、以下のファイルを大量に削除されようとしていらっしゃいますが、

第一に、何を撮して、何が書かれていいるファイルか、理解されておられるのでしょうか。ロゴが修正済みのものも含まれていますし、著作権とは関係のないものも多く含まれており、理解に大変苦しみます。個人攻撃なのでしょうか？　画像に書かれている日本語がおわかりなのですか？　何を写して、どこに問題があると思われるのか、検証されずに雰囲気だけで感じ取って、いきなり削除しようとしているように見えます。たとえば、JR creditcard 01　ではすべてロゴは修正してありますし、その旨ファイルに日本語で明記してあります。数年間、なにも問題にはなりませんでした。他の画像も、これまで長く掲載されているものを参考に、問題がないと判断して掲載したものです。問題点があるならば、どこがどう著作権的に問題なのか、指摘して下さい。あまりに大雑把で、理解に苦しみます。 Asacyan (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QI 4 megapixel

You participated in a very short discussion on file size, and you, with a few others, decided to implement a decision that was undemocratic and irresponsible. It is completely inappropriate for macro photography. How do I complain? --Charles (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was the first to request a longer voting period. I may agree that the voting period was too short, but I think it would not change anything. And just in case you are not aware, Commons is not a democracy. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my close on AN/U

[5]. Yann, I have long experience with non-admin closes. To my knowledge, there is no policy that prohibits non-admins from closing discussions in a manner that reduces disruption and represents community consensus, and while many may not be accustomed to it, most wikis allow it.

If I am incorrect about Commons policy or guidelines, please advise.

Any close may be reversed, including mine; however, when I reverse a close, I normally convert the close to a comment, because it is, in fact, a comment, and it is at least a requested speedy close. I would then explain why I was reversing the close, i.e., why the wiki or community needed it to remain open. It could even be "reversing involved close," but I would hope that you would then review the situation and either comment or close, yourself. I have restored my closing comment as a regular comment.

In this case, I saw that leaving the discussion open was encouraging these users to go back-and-forth with no value to the wiki, except possibly that one of them would finally irritate an administrator enough to be blocked. I'm trying to avoid that. I did research the history of these users. There is a small possibility of preventing Ryulong, in particular, from repeating prior history. He's going to need support, and (in this context) warnings are support.

I also considered adding a comment "non-admin, involved close," for obvious reasons. However, in this case, that would specifically have encouraged one of the users to revert it, possibly defeating the purpose. It's moot now. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abd, you should work a bit more on content, and let others deal with this kind of issue. Just a friendly advice... Yann (talk) 22:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I work where my expertise takes me. I am here and on WMF wikis for content, but my long-term interest on the wikis has been process, and I go back a long way. I contribute a certain amount of content, I always have. But my goal is to create and maintain wikis such that others create content, and the result of my work on these lines in the past has been far more good content than I could ever have created myself. I'm 70 years old, I won't be here long, but I'm creating a future that will long outlast me. Thanks for understanding that.

You have not explained your re-opening of that discussion. Just saying. --Abd (talk) 04:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, it's the duty of proactive members of the community to faciliate the ceasation of hostilities between parties, and I hope that sysops such as yourself desire to be counted among those faciliators. At the moment, the AN/U page faciliates hosilities, not peace. Allowing the discussion to play out without moderation isn't going to make things better. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 02:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Michael. To me, it's obvious that the status quo on Commons is not working. The tendency is to blame incivility on "uncivil people." It's a serious error. Anyone can and will be uncivil, in an uncivil environment. Civility frequently requires moderation. Skilled moderators can make a huge difference in organizational productivity. Frankly, the WMF should hire them.... --Abd (talk) 04:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that many of us admins have been slow responding to requests recently. So I'm certainly not averse to anyone attempting to facilitate peace (although IMO Abd you often do go a long way off topic in overly verbose posts). But I do think that can be done in ways other than thread closure. I think it's fair for users who bring a matter to an admin board to expect admin closure, so we should seek to honour that expectation. Although there is no policy about this, perhaps it is worth adding to the AN instructions (if others agree with me). --99of9 (talk) 03:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, 99of9. Yes, I write a lot. People have always had various opinions about that, but it's not the issue here. That close was succinct, and clear. I have long experience with handling user disputes, frequently defusing them. Some users take firm handling. When that doesn't happen, the situation gets bad enough that they are banned. It is not doing them a favor to allow them to fight.

If there is an expectation of an admin closure, the expectation violates long-standing wiki traditions. Current procedures explicitly allow non-admin closures when tools are not needed to implement a closure. Non-admins may close DRs with keep, for example, with expectation of consensus. I've done more than close a DR, I've actually reverted some. I've reverted RfCs on meta, or speedy-closed them, or closed them as stale, etc. Because anyone can revert a closure, it's harmless. However, if one reverts a closure, one is taking responsibility for the effects. A disruptive close -- or a disruptive revert of a close -- could deserve a warning.

The discussion being on the AN page means that it will be seen by administrators. If I incorrectly close a discussion, an admin will see that close and revert it. My close can actually increase attention. My close is basically a claim that continued discussion is not necessary, so this serves all the administrators who might think the same way. I would never close a discussion expecting lack of consensus.

My view, in general, is that, as users, we do not adequately support administrators. Instead, we expect them to resolve our petty squabbles and complain bitterly when they don't, or when they get it wrong. Many of the disputes I see, particularly on AN/U, require research to understand. I do that research and present it. If one isn't interested, fine, there is no obligation to get involved. The result of that disinterest, if it's collective, though, is continued disruption. It's obvious: it is essential that the community assist. What is important is that such assistance be aimed toward creating and maintaining a civil environment on Commons. If it is just more "get rid of the bad users," it will just increase and maintain toxicity.

Yann, this is your talk page. Any continued discussion of this here is with your sufferance. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 04:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

VI nomination

I fixed this nomination, can you check it? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that. Actually I was thinking, should the scope be restricted? I am not sure, as I don't know much about heraldry. Usually I support wide scope, but for this scope the drawing might be better. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:guido with minions.jpg

Clever... deleting the license tag and immediately tag as no license,with no warnings for both.is there a barn star for being a devious editor?you really deserve it!

@Anningia: Hi,

You can't create your own license tag out of nowhere. And I already asked you to change your signature. Should I delete it too so that you understand? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why should I still change my signature if I could fix the glitch

is it better now?

NO. Yann (talk) 10:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's enough now with NO:if I do it like this you say no,if I do it like that you say no.now how do you want that my signature look now?!10:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Dear Yann,

that's simply not true. I uploaded several pictures that belongs to me. But as I use them for disclosure of my work they appear on film festivals websites. There is a confusing concept there, because you claim that the site has copyright, which is true, but they do not have copyright of the photos, after all, they belong to several different sources that allow it uses for disclosure purposes. Anyway, what I did now was upload photos that I'm sure that never appeared anywhere just to be able to use in wiki pages. I hope there is no problem with that.

Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.115.150.68 (talk • contribs)

Hi,

All recent images have a copyright by default, even if not mentioned anywhere. If you give your account, or the list of images, I can give you further details. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I just realized i was unsigned. That's the list, right: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cainanbaladez (talk • contribs) 21:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, answer to your message on my talk page. I realize, and I will do it with the pictures that were published after I uploaded here. But what about images that i'm abolutly shure that were never published anywhere? Regards. Cainan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cainanbaladez (talk • contribs) 14:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cainanbaladez: Hi,

Images never published before should be fine. If you are a professional photographer, and that your images are often published elsewhere (either in print or on the web), I suggest that you send a general permission to OTRS. That would prevent most deletion requests. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G&K Services photos

Hi,

I totally understand why the photo uploads were rejected. My apologies.

I do have a question: G&K wants to upload those photos to Flickr and mark them with a CC License. Does that work?

I want to be clear on how to approach this so I don't get blocked.

Thanks for your help!

Jake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccormjw (talk • contribs)

@Mccormjw: Hi,

Yes, fine. Yann (talk) 19:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning

Hi Yann: Regarding your warning on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lorenzo_De_Arenas_y_Granados, they don't seem to be listening. Another whole batch of obviously not own work files have been uploaded. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning again. Thanks for reporting. A DR might be necessary if the license is not fixed soon. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Photos and Content

Hi Yann - thanks for your message and for flagging this issue with me! I will review all of our info and all of our photos to ensure they are added in the correct manner moving forward. I appreciate your prompt follow up. 19:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Complaint

Hi, you modified a protected file ignoring the pending edit request. I had lots of modified SVGs on my watchlist, and after fixing some minor issues I ended up with four protected pages in need of an update. Edit requests are a very painful procedure with lots of open tabs for cross-checks, that the request might do what it's supposed to do. On File talk:Cc-white.svg I completely missed—by clicking on [+] for a new section—that there was already an older edit request. The good news is that the new edit request is a simple "replace everything" request fixing more issues on this page. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I didn't see the request. Done now, but I kept the headers. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. (I was just wondering how this page ended up on my watch list, problem solved... :-) –Be..anyone (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO NEED HELP

i was editing the page accoerirections of the person on whom the page is .... well... givin the link of the person's real verified FACEBOOK PAGE then there will not be any issues,right 19:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quick question

What do I need to do to get so many featured, quality and valued images like you have. --Anningia (talk) 10:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anningia: Hi,

Actually I don't have so many featured, quality and valued images. Some contributors have hundreds of featured pictures, and thousands of quality or valued images. ;o)

If you want to make pictures of featured quality, you need a good camera (probably a en:DSLR), and some photographic skills and knowledge. All you need to know is available in Wikipedia. ;oD

Other contributors create SVG graphics using software like Adobe Illustrator or Inskape. Others (like me) restored old pictures and documents. There you first need patience and some technical skills with photo editing software, like Adobe Photoshop or Gimp. I hope this help. Please tell me if you have more questions, I would be happy to help. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a Nikon camera, and it makes quite good pics, but I always have to shrink the images I want to upload, because my internet connection crashes if I upload pics which are too big. As for the quality of the pics, most of mine are quite ok and without blurr, but if I photograph something which moves then some blurr is expected. --Anningia (talk) 14:22, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anningia: For big files, you can use this script: User:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js. I use that for any file bigger than 15 MB, and it works much better than the UploadWizard. I usually save my pictures with 98% or 99% compression to minimize compression artifacts. Actually, the automatic mode is rarely the best to produce good pictures. For moving subjects, you have to adjust shutter speed vs. aperture and ISO setting. See also photography, camera, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I upload some of my photos so that you can see their qualities? Also can I upload videos here? And if yes, what formats are acceptable? --Anningia (talk) 07:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anningia: Sure. For the videos, see Commons:Video. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

here are some of my pics(note:if you find the word Cyprus in their titles and description pages don't assume that this is where i make holidays)--Anningia (talk) 12:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anningia: Most of the EXIF data were removed. What is your camera, and what did you do before uploading your pictures here? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

well,I had to shrink them and some time ago upload wizard went crazy on my computer.as for my camera I've got a blue Nikon coolpix s3600--Anningia (talk) 17:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tour des Anglais, Agdde

Bonjour Yann, j'ai peur d'avoir fait une petite betise. En voulant créer une catégorie, j'ai fais une faute d'orthographe. J'ai ensuite créer la bonne : Category:Tour des Anglais, Agde. Est-ce que c'était la bonne manière de procéder, comment supprimer la mauvaise? -- Christian Ferrer 17:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Il suffit de demander. ;oD Yann (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hadzabe

Peux-tu le rebloquer mais en cochant "Ne peut modifier sa page de discussion" ? Merci. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fait Yann (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Utilisation d'une de vos photos

Bonjour, Nous aimerions utiliser une de vos photos (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Exams_in_Jaura,_India.jpg) dans le cadre d'une production en éducation. Pourriez-vous communiquer avec moi par courriel? J'aimerais clarifier une interrogation au regard des droits d'auteur donnés sur cette image. Au plaisir, Solen Poirier, poiriers@grics.ca — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.84.132.4 (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Ce mail ne fonctionne pas. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voici: poiriers@grics.ca Merci.

Unhappy customer

Hiya Yann, could you TPS me for the unhappy gent at the bottom? Je suis "pathetic"! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ethnicity of U.S. rampage killers.png

Hi Yann, I wasn't sure what the problem with this is. Could you elaborate please? Do I need to remove the usage first before nominating? The file in question has no source for the information on the ethnicity of perpetrators that it claims to be a graph of. Several other files by this author also had no source for their claims and were removed from the en project. I'll be watching this page for a response, but I'm more active on en. Thanks Padenton (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Padenton: Hi,

Yes, as it is currently used, it won't be removed. As mentioned in the DR, it should be concerted to SVG and replaced. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your block of User:Meryllid

User talk:Meryllid does contain a warning of block for uploading copyvio, but it was from 2012. The AN/U report did mention warning with a diff, but that was on en.wikipedia, a warning again by NeilN there.[6]. Then there were three copyvio notices, without warnings, recent, the last two by NeilN.

NeilN did not warn the user here before going to AN/U. The only recent warning was by NeilN and it was not on Commons, but on en.wikipedia. It referred to "you've been warned enough on Commons," but that could only refer to the single warning in 2012. There is visible evidence of content conflict between NeilN and Meryllid on en.wikipedia. That may cause a warning to be disregarded. The offense justifying block appears to be the uploading of a single file after an alleged warning that was not on Commons.

I looked further. Meryllid uploaded the poster for the film, w:en:Are All Men Pedophiles? here -- I think --, and it was deleted for copyvio (properly), in May, 2012. He uploaded it to Wikipedia, and it stands, for fair use in the article. The warning on en.wiki by NeilN was not for an image upload there. It was for alleged addition of copyrighted material to Wikipedia. In fact, this was not actual copyright violation (because of the NC license.) It was a WMF policy problem. The edit, was using the file he uploaded here (that you just speedied). That file, or a version of it could be used on Wikipedia under a fair use claim, and it is very possible that the owner's permission could be obtained for hosting here. It's a picture of him, being used to illustrate an article about him. NeilN was revert warring with Meryllid on a number of articles. We cannot get into Wikipedia content issues, but it appears that a Wikipedia conflict has been brought here.

I'm not seeing adequate cause for a block here. The user has uploaded files with iffy licenses, i.e, what a naive user might think are okay. An NC license may well seem usable to such. This user needs support, not blocking, such as an explanation of the NC license issue. Will you consider helping this user? I will support the user, I'm willing to do the heavy lifting of explaining all this, but wanted to give you first opportunity to hold out your hand. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 02:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK fine, I unblocked him/her. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abd, oh come on. Copyright notices are warnings. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous. I count at least seven of these on the user's talk page and three more derivative works notices. And please don't spread incorrect information about the English-language Wikipedia's fair use policies. There is no fair use for images of living people per NFCC #1. [7] If you want to help, please make sure the user has the correct info. --NeilN (talk) 12:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's correct about fair use for people; but the problem is not copyvio. It's about WMF policy on non-free images, and this comes into conflict with the purposes of the projects, so projects must mediate and choose. Not a matter to be resolved here. The most straightforward solution for that photo is to gain permission from the copyright owner. My biggest concern is that the user does not have email enabled, and may end up uploading without being aware of what transpired.

No, copyright notices are not warnings unless they say so.

Now, I suspect that the user didn't see what had happened. Email is not enabled. There may be a language problem. To top it off, the user was just indef blocked on enwiki. The blocking admin noted that it is "indef" as in "until resolved," not "indef" as in forever. The block reason was one often used against SPAs, which is sad, but if the user becomes communicative, it might work out okay. However, I can't help the user on en.wiki, especially with no email enabled. So, Yann, thanks for that unblock, it was a nice gesture. It didn't work this time, and I'm sorry for any extra trouble.

I have written to the subject of the photo you just deleted, to see if he will release under a proper free license. Maybe some good will come out of this. --Abd (talk) 04:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Abd: "Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing." - plain English. --NeilN (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, pinged. I looked for such warnings, and believe I described the history accurately. But it doesn't matter. There was no actual copyright violation, I now know that. I contacted the subject of the photo, the apparent copyright owner. Maryllid had permission. However, she had no clue how to handle this, and did anyone help her? To be sure, she was not communicative. Consider, though, how she would read that warning! She's not violating copyright. What she was doing was violating Commons procedures (and there may be other details.) It will take a little time to get this sorted, and I'm pretty busy elsewhere. Maryllid doesn't have email open, but I believe the owner has her email, so I may be able to establish supportive communication. Again, Yann, thanks for your good faith unblock. When I have OTRS arranged, if the owner agrees, I may ask for another action. --Abd (talk) 19:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

greetings im carmen

yooo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamakilla (talk • contribs) 21:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mission to Mars

Hello, Yann, you deleted a photo of mine and I want to know why? That still shot was from a Public Domain trailer on Internet Archive. It is an honest mistake, I'm sure. Please put it back as soon as you receive this message, or did you erase it from Wiki completely? GEOGOZZ (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GEOGOZZ: Hi,

This image is not in the public domain. It is under a copyright by the film producer. Please read COM:L before uploading any file. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, please, take a look at this page. I made a photograph on movie maker of a "PUBLIC DOMAIN" trailer. It is my photo. You will see that this trailer is in Public Domain. Look below the video. It reads, "PUBLIC DOMAIN Mark 1.0." What part of that don't you understand? https://archive.org/details/MissionToMarsTrailer Thank you, GEOGOZZGEOGOZZ (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GEOGOZZ: Hi,

Sorry, but no. archive.org is not a reliable source, and in this case, it is clearly wrong. You can ask other admins at COM:UDR, but I am pretty sure you will get the same answer. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Yann, but I frankly don't think it is worth the effort. To me, Wikipedia is missing out on a great resource. Have a great day! GEOGOZZGEOGOZZ (talk) 01:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review and help upload a photo

I tried to upload a photo clicked and copyright owned by me, can you please review and help with licenses if needed. This was deleted from commons: File:YashD_Shooting_BSB_Kolkata_profile.jpg

Please let me know the issue so that I can rectify and upload a picture as profile for Yash Dasgupta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpadma (talk • contribs)

@Mpadma: Hi,

This picture comes from Tweeter, so you need a permission from the photographer. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello Dear Yann,

All pictures belong to me. My students allow me to share on wikibook. We are doing a class project and want to share contributor's biographies. So there is no violation for pictures.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halilkayaduman (talk • contribs)

@Halilkayaduman: Hi,

To avoid any suspicion or later issues, you should send a mail to COM:OTRS explaining the situation. At the very least, you need more explanation in the description and on your user page. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, what should be done with this situation?

Hi Yann,

Today I found File:Pfarrkirche 'Maria Himmelfahrt', Fröhlichsturm und Johannesturm in MALS.jpg, which is a better version of File:MALS Pfarrkirche Froehlichsturm.jpg. Now both files appear in this article: de:Mals, which seems crazy to me. Both uploaders seem to have a Teleskop name, but with a slight difference. Wouldn't the best solution be to update the file that has OTRS permission with the new version? If so, I don't know how to do that. Thanks in advance for your help, and have a nice day. Dontreader (talk) 21:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

YashD_Shooting_BSB_Kolkata_profile

Hi @Yann:

Thanks for your comment, but the picture comes from me(MPadma) it's was downloaded by some sources from wikipedea commons and redistributed before it was deleted by wiki editor!

Sending photos to Wikipedia permissions to get reviewed and then revoked or uploaded fresh. Ticket raised as: Ticket#: 2015042810006497. So please let me know how to proceed henceforth. Thanks for your help Mpadma 19:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:YashD_Shooting_BSB_Kolkata_profile.jpg

My Apology

Hello. It's been a while since I've been here. Anyway, I would like to let you know that I am very sorry for uploading copyrighted content onto this site. All I wanted to do was help out by uploading some pictures to pages that I felt needed them. I now understand how much of a fool I was. Sincerely yours, Budgielover2988. User:Budgielover2988 (talk) 19:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dianetics-italian-1951-casini.jpg

Hi Yann, I saw that you deleted the cover of 1951 book. The reason you mentioned is "violation of copyright". I took it with my camera, it would be a derivated work. The editor is not anymore alive, there is any possibility to have it back? Any suggestion? Thanks --Renatoongania (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Renatoongania: Hi,

The copyright exists until 70 years after its owner's death. So a permission from the heirs is necessary. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) - Renatoongania, much of Hubbard's non-USA work won't enter the public domain until at least 2057 because he died in 1986. I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure he passed the copyright of his works to Author Services and Bridge Publications who are highly unlikely to ever license anything. Although Hubbard has living heirs (children and grandchildren), I think it is unlikely they have the authority to license his work. It is worth a try though. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Night of the Living Dead

Fair enough. Are any of the versions at https://archive.org/details/Night_Of_The_Living_Dead_raw_HD_WS usable alongside the Webm one? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Yann/archives 24

Requesting that you block a user

Reuploading photographs from SpaceX

Violations de copyright

Asian University Image uploads

please

Image uploading

Document du 1er février 1914

Supression de photos

İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq

Tagging copyvios

Foto's Jaap Rus

Regarding the undeletion of the file IRNSS-1D CleanRoom and others

Whoops!

A cup of coffee for you!

Photo Paul Zinsli

Is it okay if you double check the French I added?

problème de licence/visuels Henry Déziré (suite)

Logo Thuillier

Vithun Ravindran

Créer une page Wikimedia Commons sur Henry Déziré?

licence photo du musée de Saint Etienne (tableau Henry Déziré)

Photos Paul Zinsli

Copyright Violation

Copyvios floraiberica.com ?

Prematurely closing deletion discussions...

Auto-Block

Deleting pages

Photos Paul Zinsli

Deletion request - more videos

A barnstar for you!

Why you delete the photographs?

Phony photo of an alleged lynching

That recent KEEP

Deleted file

Projet Poirier

A QUESTION

Kept image

Fichiers Paul Zinsli

Copyright violations

大量の削除について

QI 4 megapixel

Your reversion of my close on AN/U

VI nomination

File:guido with minions.jpg

Copyright violations

G&K Services photos

Your warning

New Photos and Content

Complaint

HELLO NEED HELP

Quick question

Utilisation d'une de vos photos

Unhappy customer

Your block of User:Meryllid

greetings im carmen

Mission to Mars

Please review and help upload a photo

Copyright violations

Please, what should be done with this situation?

YashD_Shooting_BSB_Kolkata_profile

My Apology

Dianetics-italian-1951-casini.jpg

Night of the Living Dead

Navigation menu

Search