User talk:Samulili

Start a new subject here
NB! Please tell me if you would like me to answer here or on your talk page.

Treasures of the past:

2005–2006
2007: Moi, Image:IndiaMap.png, Image:CNT-armoured-car-factory.jpg & Image:36 tramcnt.jpg, Zürich, Coats of Arms, Welcome log active again, Silent Hunter III, Template:Duplicate, Image:Palma-mercalova.jpg, Image:Oswald hahmo.jpg, lisenssistä, Free fi.wikipedia license to CommonsHelper, Karpacz Samotnia, Categories naming, About Image:Laden.jpg, Deletion of Armenian genocide memorial photo, Kysymys, Image:SophiaGal.JPG, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Sputnik 1.jpg, Categories, Images, overwrite images, Template:Please link images -- Thanks!, Museum, A question, Hi, Suomen kunnista, Simple photographs, FP Promotion, please, Image:Tour Montparnasse, Paris.jpg, PD-Finland, Revert, Commons:Deletion requests/Wikipe-tan lolicon (2007-01-04), Regulations of German Law towards common photos (not the Artphotos), Green politicians, Template:FinnishDefenceForces, Call to arms, Last comment, Tips for image deletions requests and user messages, Names of the regions, Category:Requested moves, My email to you, Authorization for Image:Xanaduoutside80s.jpg

re:

Thank you for your voice.

I respect every Wiki rules ( As I can ). I cannot respect every moves of every wikiadmins, who f.ex. does not respect the rights of uploader ( remarks for speeedy deletion of images without informing the uploader- it is not exact in this case, but it was made permanently by User:Polarlys. Try to view his deleting requests and mark, when the uploader was noticed for supply of info.

Post scriptum

I think also that the whole discussion about PD-Finland-50, PD-Dennmark, and PD-Sweden is useless for obvious reason, that we all have to respect the regulations of Finnish, Swedish or Dannish law, and the only valid interpretation is F, S. or D. court interpretation of common law, not private German opinions is (or even verdicts of German Courts - there are suitable only on the territory of FRG, not abroad.

Is anyone (brave Viking) in whole Scandinavia to conclude and close these discusssions or there will be disputed without conclusion to the end of the world ;)

Freedom First - every limitation has to be justify in detail.

Best regards:

Andros64 10:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr-työkalusta

Moi, suosittelit keskustelusivullani Flickr-kuvien lisäämiseen työkalua osoitteessa http://tools.wikimedia.de/~bryan/flickr/upload. Tuo palvelu näyttää kuitenkin vaativan yli 50 Commons-muokkausta toimiakseen, joten joutunen vielä jonkin aikaa lisäämään mahdolliset Flickr-kuvat ilman sitä. Kiitoksia kuitenkin vinkistä! --Kjne 07:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Потоп.jpg

You delete Image:Потоп.jpg (log). This is image from illuminated manuscript finded in XIV century:

Русский: «Венская Книга Бытия»

оther name:

Русский: «Венецианский Генезис»

Please restore this image

License: {{PD-art}}
Sources: http://www.xlegio.ru/pubs/zorich/early_manus.htm, http://staff3.chat.ru/grek-rim.htm (http://staff3.chat.ru/potop_.gif)

--Butko 11:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kekkonen

First, congratulations on successfully defending Template:PD-Finland50 from deletion. Secondly, which strings do I have to pull to find more photos of Urho Kekkonen under acceptable licenses? The article about sv:Urho Kekkonen is a featured article at Swedish Wikipedia and will appear on the front page on his birthday in early September. It would be nice if the selection of photos were bigger. Regards, Thuresson 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons_talk:Licensing#Creative_Commons_3.0_.28last_time.2C_hopefully.29

I know you are interested in the CC 3.0 stuff, so I would like to inform you about Commons_talk:Licensing#Creative_Commons_3.0_.28last_time.2C_hopefully.29. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Just wanted to drop you a note of thanks for your help on IRC. - NDComputerGeek 11:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Rename a category

Please, don't revert my work for pointless pretexts. I should like that you act in a more cooperative way. --Juiced lemon 17:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Havis Amanda 2005.jpg

Moron, jaksaisitko käydä vilasemassa tuota? Lisämielipiteet ovat tervetulleita. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 19:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping to fend off the vandalism to my user space!

Your help is very much appreciated! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Conrad photo

I would appreciate it if you could restore the classic photo of Joseph Conrad that you deleted, and which previously graced the Wikipedia article about him. Nihil novi 23:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to tell that it is not possible to restore the image. There is reason to believe that the image is still copyrighted. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Joseph Conrad.jpg. Best regards, Samulili 09:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kelpaako Commonsiin?

Rupesin tässä miettimään, että kelpaako tämä kuva tänne Commonsiin. Teoksen on tehnyt Wäinö Aaltonen, joka kuoli vuonna 1966. Patsaan julkistusaikaa en näin äkkiseltään löytänyt. Eli kuinka vanhojen patsaiden kuvia tänne saa lisätä? --Merikapteeni 17:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ei se ikävä kyllä kelpaa. Suomesta saa lisätä patsaiden kuvia, jos patsaan suunnittelija on kuollut yli 70 vuotta sitten. Samulili 18:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Selevä. Yritän 29 vuoden päästä uudelleen. ;) --Merikapteeni 18:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poistaisitko sen kuvan joskus, kun et vielä näköjään ollut. Itse en osaa merkitä roskaksi. --Merikapteeni 18:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stadsnetbrugge.jpg

Hello. You have still this image somewhere, or is it completely deleted? I could make a vectorisation from it... Gr, Wikifalcon 10:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Serbia1918.png

If I do not make mistake you have made final decision (Keep) about this map. My question if you are willing to change name of map to Territory under Serbian control in 1918 because this map is in reality showing that. This link [1] is showing truth of my statement because it is clearly stated on page number 11 that Hungarian civil and police administration is staying on territory under Serbian control. There is 1 similar link and invitation to Montenegro to send delegation for peace agreements in january of 1919. I ask that you to move map on new name because if I do that there is possibility of revert war (between Hungarian and Croatian user on 1 side and Serbian users on another) and I really hate that. If there is no problem can you please answer on my talk page. ---Rjecina 01:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message to User:Postmann Michael

Hi Samulili, due to your message on the notice board for admins I became aware of your message to User:Postmann Michael. As Postmann Michael does not speak English or does prefer not to read anything in English (I do not know which), I've translated your message for him into German. I second everything you said but want to add a notice. Wikipedians coming from the German wikipedia tend to be used to have full authority over their talk page including the privilege to delete messages they do not like. His comment indicated that he removed your message because it was not written in German. Regards and good luck in resolving this conflict, --AFBorchert 08:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC) P.S.: I expect you to respond here.[reply]

Thank you. It seems to me that Postmann Michael does understand some English it was kind of you to translate my message. I also want to thank you for sheding light on an important cultural difference with regard to user talk pages. That information is very useful. Samulili 10:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Postmann Michael has written a response in German. I do not want to translate the whole thing (most of it are complaints against Rex) but to give just a short summary: He has acknowledged your notice (i.e. he read it but he does not necessarily accept it), he does not think that it applies to him as he, in his opinion, didn't anything wrong, he intends to continue uploading of maps, he does not care how others view these maps, he intends to clear his talk page in five days, and he declared end of discussion. Because of the latter, I will not respond to this. However, feel free to tell me if you have anything to translate for him. But I do not have got the impression that he is ready to find a path which allows us to address these conflicts calmly or within the rules of our community. --AFBorchert 11:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if the revert war at Image:Historisches deutsches Sprachgebiet.PNG (and elsewehre) was deleted from the logs? Can't find the image version marked with big red letters anymore. User:Rex Germanus/en:User:Rex Germanus is once again under scrutiny over at en-Wiki, see Community sanction noticeboard [2] --Matthead 18:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I deleted the images with big red letters spelling nazi etc. accusations. I figure that will make such vandalism seem less appealing to those who engage in it. That, and protecting the images. Samulili 05:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Running for Admin on en.Wikipedia?

Can you confirm that you are the user on the English Wikipedia that is running for adminship at that project's Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Samulili page? GRBerry 17:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's me. Samulili 18:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC) (diff for signature)[reply]

About Image:Chrysalis5504.jpg

The image is taken by en:User:Pollinator and released under GFDL, since upload in here the origin was deleted in en wiki.--Fanghong 02:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muutama OTRS

Pystyisitkö tarkistamaan nämä?

Image:AshaBhosle1.jpg (lähdesivuston http://www.bollywoodblog.com/ alalaidassa sivun kuvilta kielletään kaupallinen käyttö), toisin kuin tägi kuvan sivulla väittää.
Image:ANNA Chakvetadze.jpg, kuuluuko luvan piiriin muita kuvia kuvaajan sivustolta jonka alalaidassa oikeudet pidätetään kuten olettaa sopii (kuvan tallentaja Flominator ei ole vastannut). t., --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 22:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Molemmat ovat OK. Samulili 12:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, kiitoksia. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 19:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Luokan poisto?

Tuolla oli sekä Category:Ingå ja Category:Inkoo. Siirsin kuvat tuohon suomenkieliseen. En löytänyt mitään roskaa-mallinetta vastaavaa täältä, niin laittaisitko tuon ruotsinkielisen poistoon? On siellä muutama muukin kunta ruotsinkielisellä nimellä, mutta en nyt alkanut tekemään uusia luokkia suomenkielisellä nimellä. --Velma 10:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Siirsin kaikki kuvat ruotsinkieliseen, koska Inkoon enemmistökieli on ruotsi. Samulili 11:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor no recree imágenes suprimidas

Me imajino que es la File:Bandera de Huécija.jpg sde trata de una bandera de un municipio hecha por mi mismo(trabajo propio)con el photoshop7 anteriormente no puse correctamente la etiqueta y fue eliminada desconocia el proceso a seguir y he visitado lo que me has dicho pero la verdad que no me aclaro mucho. Esopero poder solucionar dicho problema

REDIRECT Miguillen

Image:DanRatherSignOffCropped.jpg

Thanks for trying to help at Image:DanRatherSignOffCropped.jpg, because I don't think I've had to deal with a Commons deletion before. (SEWilco 01:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks

For dealing with the "user problem" so well. I know tt is not an easy job at times, regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hum

I do not like people who attack others so I have blocked User talk:Ismeni indefinitely. They obviously ignore all warnings as well. If you feel it too harsh I have no objection to you shortening the period, cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 pictures

Hello

You have tagged to images that I have uploaded with missing permission (Image:John Wark.jpg and Image:Turbokadett.jpg). I have received permission from two different persons using email. The problem is that they are in norwegian so I guess you won't be able to understand what it says. What shall I do? Kind regards TEMH 20:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg forstår norsk :) You will have to send the e-mails to commons-permissions@wikimedia.org . Once you have done that, just let me know and I'll fix the image information. Samulili 05:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have forwarded the mail regarding John Wark. I havent found the email from turbokadett yet, so I am waiting to receive it again. Kind regards TEMH 21:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have now also forwarded the mail regarding turbokadett. Hope u can remove the missing permission tag on both pictures. Kind regards TEMH 12:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ASUS-laptop-A6B00R.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:ASUS-laptop-A6B00R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Liftarn 11:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Olga Lemberg.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Olga Lemberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Liftarn 11:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudosoria.JPG

Why have you erased the image File:Escudosoria.JPG ? I made this image, and do not deal why you erase it. I would be grateful to you that you were answering me. --Dgarcia29 18:35, 30 October 2007

Image:P1040307-musee-de-la-peche-concarneau.jpg

You removed my picture with the comment «"For non-commercial usage see below. Commercial usage requires a written contract. Higher resolution is available on request." Commercial use must be allowed for all». In my opinion this is pretty rude and frustrating to somebody, who is new here. Why didn't you ask me to change the license? --Bhogi 09:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rorschach

Hello, I am not trying to be a bother, but it seems obvious that Huber owns the copyright to the Rorschach. This is according to Huber 's website and the International Society of the Rorschach and Projective Methods. I really don't know how it could be much clearer. The Rorschach is still a regularly used instrument. The company that has published the instrument since its creation is not going to let the copyright run out on a profitable instrument. Again, I am not trying to be difficult. I am trying to protect the integrity of the instrument. -- Psy guy 03:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:PhilipIV01.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PhilipIV01.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 22:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jokela window 2.jpeg

hi, could you tell me why this image was deleted?? the comment of "not a decision or a statement/ei lausuma tai päätös" is not really that informative as to the reason and i cant see any pages that link to the image.

thanks

--Markie 18:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. The image is a work of a government employee of Finland, and the image was tagged with {{PD-FinlandGov}}. However, that tag is to be used only with decisions or statements by an authority or a public body of Finland. This image was neither. Samulili 20:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Diplodactylinae_Underwoodisaurus_milii_male.png

Hello,

I saw (lately) a message from you on my talk page about this image.
Well, you say that I should transmit a writen permission from the author of the picture. It is not really easy. People not used with WP hardly gives pictures of animals, they do not want to put pictures themself (it's a little complicated when not used to) and they do not want to write some kind of official letters.
I met the original author times ago, she said I can use the picture on WP using its pseudo as author, and that's all. If it is not enough you can delete the picture as I will not obtain more for that picture.

BTW this kind of "complication" may make people pretend that they are author of pictures only to make things simple...

Regards, Hexasoft 19:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PS: please answer on my talk page.

Too late, it was deleted.

Hexasoft 20:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Riihimäki - Glass guy by Kalervo Kallio 1960 - 1.jpg

Hey

Could this image go ahead and be deleted again please, I was in the process of correcting broken links in my gallery and didn't read the deletion log (I know my bad, feel free to hit me with a big stick if you like) I'll get an allowed picture some time I'm sure, probably wait until summer or spring.

Thanks --Hellahulla

Kuvan Sigyn uudelleen nimeäminen

Kämmäsin ja kuvittelin tämän kuvan esittävän Sigyniä, joten et viitsisi ylläpitäjän oikilla nimetä tuota Estelleksi kun kerran sitä paattia kuva esittää? Toinen kysymys on, että olisiko oikeampi tapa kuvien uudelleennimeämiseen uppia ne vaan uusiksi oikealla nimellä ja merkitä vanha roskaksi? --Zache

L. Ron Hubbard pictures

I'm afraid you seem to have misunderstood what qualifies as a derivative work in two deletion debates, on images of L. Ron Hubbard, that you recently closed. Could you please take a look at Commons:Village pump#Wrongly decided deletion debates? -- ChrisO 20:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P. F. Strawson.jpg

Moi! Pyydän anteeksi, kun häiritsen, mutta voisitko asiantuntijana joutessasi katsoa, onko otsikon linkin takana oleva kuva tekijänoikeusrikkomus? Itse en ainakaan löydä lähdesivustolta mainintaa GFDL-lisenssistä. Terv, Herra Maka 11:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hoidettu. Samulili 15:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

I've just discovered that you deleted an image another admin was not willing to delete. Many thanks. --Freddyballo 14:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit of Freedom (Vapauden hengetär) poisto??

Mitä vikaa kuvassa Spirit of freedom.jpg oli, että poistit sen? Se oli itse ottamani kuva. No, en tiedä julkisten patsaiden copyright-jutuista...--Pasixxxx 14:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aikaisemmasta keskustelusta huomasin: "Ei se ikävä kyllä kelpaa. Suomesta saa lisätä patsaiden kuvia, jos patsaan suunnittelija on kuollut yli 70 vuotta sitten".

Kyllä on olemassa uskomattoman typeriä copyright-lakeja.--Pasixxxx 14:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Air Force images

Hi Samulili; thanks for the help with Image:Turkish LPD concept by Fincantieri at IDEF 2007.jpg‎. Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re. Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Jubileelinetrain.jpg

Hey, I closed this "speedily" as it was requested here - I figured there was no harm done in deleting early, as it should be deleted anyway, and that it was better for the peace of mind of the user in question if we did it ASAP. If someone has a differing opinion I'd be happy to consider it, obviously. If possible/necessary, could you please reply on my talk page? Cheers, — Giggy 06:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paavola, Neulaniemi v. 1957.jpg

Right, but it should be removed anyway, I think. - Erik Baas 12:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is an artistic opinion. You are free, of course, to remove it and upload the version without that tree. If you want to replace the current file with the cropped file, I think it would be nice if you asked the uploader which one he or she prefers. Samulili 14:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let the people who edit the pictures decide; I'm sure they'll know what's best. - Erik Baas 23:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freudenberg-Ralph 05.jpg

Hi, if there is no copyright problem with the above image, could you please restore it? It was in use on w:nn:far. As an aside, I find it quite sad if the collection under discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Anton Julius Winblad II and others was mostly deleted, as they represented well-documented images of everyday life from a period where we don't have that much free material. --Ranveig 14:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Eero_Järnefelt.gif

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eero_Järnefelt.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cecil 08:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Finnish municipal elections, 2004, Green League.png

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 08:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nelly van Doesburg Mondriaan HannahHoch 1924.jpg re-uploaded

Samulili, I just re-uploaded this image after finding it in Yve-Alan Bois (et. al.). Piet Mondriaan. 1872-1944. Zwolle: Waanders Uitgevers, 1994 (ISBN9040097208): p. 46. According to the caption to the picture in this book the picture was taken by an unknown photographer (Fotograaf onbekend). However, it was taken in Theo van Doesburg's studio, where he moved to February 1924, which makes it likely he was the author of this picture. But either way (Van Doesburg died over 70 years ago) the picture is Public Domain. As least that's what I think. I hope you will agree with me and that we have it right this time. Regards, Vincent Steenberg 12:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fi:Kuva:Ruoska2008.JPG

Was reuploaded here as Image:Groupe ruoska.jpg here. However, I doubt that EMI license promo photos under free licenses. Please take a look. --EugeneZelenko 16:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with {{Nsd}} in fi.wiki. Samulili 16:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image talk:Civil Ensign of Croatia.svg

You had every right to protect the file but reverting to the version of the file that is not synchronized with other files that make a central part of Symbols of Croatia is somewhat strange.

Not even commenting on the revertment that is exactly the same as the other contributor User:Minestrone claims to be.

I am still going to comment on the necessity that all of the Symbols that make a central part of the presence of Croatia on Wikipedia should be the same as the majority of those symbols.

Also I think that when an admin locks a file that he/she is not taking sides. In this case you took the side of Minestrone.

If you are not taking sides why didn't you lock the file at a version that was in the time of locking.

The file that you reverted to has the CoA different from Croatian Coat of Arms.svg

I expect that you change the file back to the version that was on the file when you locked it because of all of the reasons that are mentioned above and below.

Also one of the reasons may be that the Symbols are under discussion and that Minestrone's version of the Flag of Croatia.svg have been impartialy locked by an administrator. So if we are impartial the file Civil Ensign of Croatia.svg should be locked at the version that was also last.

Also talk page on the Civil Ensign is a part of the talk page on Flag of Croatia.svg

Rainman 21:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I understand your concern, but the only way to not take sides is to lock the image to its original version. Other versions are allowed but in this case—as in other cases—they have to be uploaded using a different name. Samulili 09:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting to the version that Minestrone begun to advocate is not impartial as well as locking the file indefinetly ("for all times"). Why haven't you locked on a current version for a month. -- Rainman 23:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another proof for not making your "permanent" move is available on my talk page, at which the orriginal uploader gave me permission to change the file. It was the author of the file Denelson83 who gave me permission to change something at its rightful place (not forcing me to find another place or name for my file). This is why you should reconsider again on the protection of that file on the version at which you found the file to be at. -- Rainman 20:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The permission were given before any changes to the file that you locked were made. -- Rainman 20:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your understanding of the issue

If I understood it correctly and bearing in mind your statement ((Reverted to the original version; put modifications somewhere else)) is that when differences in oppinions occur then simply go to the orriginal (first upload) version and you are safe.

This is not (in my oppinion) the correct way of solving anything because some images are related and when this relation is jeopardized because when following such practices ((Reverted to the original version; put modifications somewhere else)) we might loose the coherency of these related images.

I will clarify the case on an example such as flags of Finland.

Nobody says that all flags of Finland must look the same in each and every second. This is impossible to do even if a Law exist that requests such usage.
Nobody says this applies to all flags of Finland but only on those in the "main" name space which is brought in as a rule on Wikipedia. For example Flag of xyz, Naval Ensign of xyz.

So we have the "main" name space of the official flags of Finland which consists of:

Image:Flag of Finland.svg first upload on 27 Sep 2005
Image:Flag of Finland (state).svg first upload on 3 Feb 2006
Image:Naval Ensign of Finland.svg also on 3 Feb 2006
Image:Presidential Standard of Finland.svg on 17 Jul 2006

And with your logic we should if differences of oppinions occur change the (for example) Naval Ensign of Finland to its orriginal (first uploaded) form nevertheless of Flag of Finland in its current nor orriginal (first upload) form being different.

I think that this would lead to mis-informing the public.

This (Reverted to the original version; put modifications somewhere else) couldn't be an valid approach when dealing with related items. What chaos would arrive if everybody changed the Flags of Germany and not lookup to the "main" name space flag (Image:Flag of Germany.svg). What maheim would it be if the dependent images would not ged synchronized.

I strongly suggest to you to un-lock the file in question Image:Civil Ensign of Croatia.svg in order this file would get synchronized with the "main" name space flag.

Rainman 21:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New development! Minestrone removed the Template:protected from the Image:Flag of Croatia.svg this probabbly means that a compromise has been reached. But I am not completely sure of that. In this light I hope that you would unlock the Image:Civil Ensign of Croatia.svg in order to provide me or some other user to synchronize the image with the "main" one. -- Rainman 22:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amanullah Khan

Hi, I've found similar image at persian wiki [3] there is marked as PD. Is it possible to add it to wiki commons ? --Lubicz 11:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish speaker needed

Could you take a look at Commons:Help desk#hi, please? Lupo 14:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Surtsey.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Surtsey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TheDJ 19:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-self

Hi,

There is a little bug in this template. When you put the mouse over the text between "العربية‎" and "Español" and also between "فارسی‎" and "Latina", the text is moving. You can answer me here. Ftiercel 17:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kõik õigused autorile

Thank you very much.

i am going to tag some pictures by the uploader of that picture as copyright violation.Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^commons_es 10:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC) (no answer needed)[reply]

rename

I don't think this edit was necessary, or am I missing something here? Finn Rindahl 16:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re Jokela images

Terve, Samulili - I wanted to apologise for overreacting earlier on the Jokela images. OTRS backed you up on the images, and I should have known better than to accept such a vague release statement, in any language. I'll be more amiable in any future encounters and wish you luck with your contributions. :-) Dcoetzee 04:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect image please

I made an uprotect request for an image here[4] but I've been redirected to you as you're the one who protected the given image. It's about this image[5] who has been closed for about a year now. you can reply here - cheers Pietervhuis 21:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Green politicians, part 2

Moi! Laitan tähän uudelleen vanhan viestini, joka oli mennyt arkistoon ilman vastausta.

Oon nyt lisännyt tänne kuvia poliitikoista. Ne kaikki näkyvät käyttäjäsivullani. Voisitko tarkistaa, onko niissä kaikki kohdallaan, ja pitääkö noita varten pyytää kuvan kohteelta lupa? (Typoja, määrittelyjä, luokituksia jne. saa korjata!) Ehkä kannattaa myös tsekata, onko kuvan Image:Sumuvuori.jpg oikeudet varmasti ok.

Mites muuten noiden luokkien ja galleriasivujen kanssa: Kumpi on ensisijainen, jos samasta kohteesta on useampia kuvia? Mä tyhjensin jonkun sivun (kun en tiennyt, mikä täällä on roskamallinetta vastaava) ja korvasin sen luokalla. Commonsin käyttö on vähän hankalaa, jos osaa huonosti englantia...

LISÄYS: Joku sanoi (muistaakseni irkissä), että julkisuuden henkilöiltä ei tarvitse pyytää lupaa henkilökuvan julkaisuun. Miten on? Nyt muutamiin mun kuviin on ilmestynyt ”Personality rights warning”. (Yhdessä niistä kuvista on laulaja esiintymässä, kahdessa muusikko keikan jälkeen ja loput on poliitikkojen poseerauksia.) Lähetin muuten aamulla OTRS:ään luvat muutamasta kaverin ottamasta kuvasta, mutten oo vielä saanut vastausta. --Elena 18:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moi taas! Pitäiskö tosta OTRS-tarkistuksesta tulla joku ilmoitus? Sähköpostiin vai tänne Commonsiin? --Elena 13:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your pictures

Hello, I want to know the name of the church of Rovaniemi please.

Issue on the Finnish wikipedia

Hi, I wanted to draw this thread on meta to your attention: m:Talk:Steward requests/SUL requests#Problem with Finnish Wikipedia. Apparently fiwiki bureaucrats are unwilling to allow people to usurp existing accounts for SUL purposes - even when those accounts have never made any edits. Though each wiki has been free to develop its own policy regarding single login, this seems to be the only one where the crats are refusing to allow any accounts to be taken over at all. Could you look into this? Sorry to trouble you with this but I thought as you have a pretty extensive cross-wiki presence you were a sensible person to ask, and I confess you were the only fiwiki sysop I could think of. Perhaps you could set in motion the development of a local policy or perhaps run for crat there yourself? Anything that might move thing along there would be great. WjBscribe 08:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have made some progress on this issue [6] anyway but would still be great if you could take a look. WjBscribe 09:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finn

Lu votre message au sujet de l'image de Finn que j'ai écrasée : c'est aussi un dessin au format svg représentant le Finn vu de profil. Sauf qu'il est moins...plus... réaliste. Mais comme vous semblez tenir à ce dessin, je recharge le mien sous un autre nom. --Barbetorte (talk) 06:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hi, thanks for helping here. I have no idea what to make of the situation, I am not vandalising or using sockpuppets, and I have no reasons to. Also, I am not bothering User:Le Behnam's work even when many times it is controversial. It is he/she who is removing images of known w:Pashtun people from Pashtuns gallery. [7] I've clearly explained to Le Behnam that Category:Ahmad Zahir was an ethnic Pashtun (by providing well respected source) at several places [8], [9], [10], including on his/her talk page but he/she refuses to acknowledge or accept it and keeps removing the guys image from Pashtuns gallery. Administrator Rocket000 also gave Le Behnam final warnings to stop removing categories or images. [11], [12]--Executioner (talk) 00:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Canadians vimy ridge.jpg

Sorry about the overwrite. I took a closer look and the image is not a derivative of a cdn. archive photograph, as I had originally thought. I have re-uploaded the image under a different name.

I would however appreciate it if you provided additional information about the source of the image. I have a strong suspicion that (if it’s a Vimy image) the work is a derivative of an archive of Canada owned image and thus a PD-Canada tag would be required as well as Library and Archives Canada catalogue information. Labattblueboy (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse for closing DRs early on 11 July

I closed a few deletion requests way too early today ([13], [14], [15], [16], [17]). It was an accident and I didn't mean to do this. 'm sorry. I thought I was going through Commons:Deletion_requests/2008/05 closing old deletion requests. My bad. If you disagree with my decision, just revert them without any bureaucratic hassle and if you want me to restore an image feel free to ask me.

(And if you're wondering why I'm writing a message to myself, it's because I'm anticipating guests ;) Samulili (talk) 10:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Koavf (talk · contribs) and Pro-SADR vandalism

Please try to speak with this user to stop propagada. [18] [19]. thank you --Flad (talk) 14:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lisäsäsin..

Lisäsäsin uuden "Copyionote" mallineen suomeksi.Se on tässä([20]) voisitko sinä laittaa sen tuohon kilipalkkiin{{copyvionote/lang}} ?--Terveisin:CHELLBER 114 (Keskustele) 21:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 3e80ae54e008395f1ce6b94d7da4789f

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Coenzyme A.jpg etc.

I noticed that you undeleted a couple of incorrect chemical structure diagrams that I deleted. There are a very large number of incorrect chemical structure images hosted on Commons and a process was created to deal with them. This involves marking them with {{Disputed chem}} which puts them in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Incorrect structures that reside in that category for more than a month without objection are routinely speedy deleted. Hundreds of images have been deleted by this process. Undeleting incorrect structures because they depict "something" does not make sense to me. Commons simply should not be hosting incorrect chemical structure diagrams. Unless you think these images are not wrong, can you please redelete them? Thank you. Edgar181 (talk) 12:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Full ack. --Leyo 13:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, if the structure is wrong, it does not depict what it claims to depict and may instead show something that does not really exist. TimVickers (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously don't have a good answer. Hence, I will add “speedydelete” again soon, as the images are incorrect and there is no use for them thinkable. --Leyo 16:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Location of the BOTs.png

Hi,

I overwrote the previous image with one that included Crown Dependencies since this image links to the template w:Template:British dependencies, which also includes w:Crown Dependencies. It would be more appropriate to update this image than upload a new one and change the image in all 137 pages... Thanks. --RaviC (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If reply needed, contact me on my user talk page.

Quantität vor Qualität?

Hallo Samulili, am 7. Juli 2008 hast Du Thomas Doerfer kritisiert, weil er ein weniger gelungenes Bild durch ein besseres ersetzte. Ich frage mich deswegen – und auch aus anderen Gründen –, ob es in der Bildersammlung der Commons in erster Linie um Quantität und nur nachrangig um Qualität geht. Ich beobachte seit einiger Zeit den Benutzer Luftfahrrad alias Matthias93, der jedes Auto, das ihm vor die Linse kommt, zu fotografieren und in die Commons hochzuladen scheint. Er brachte es kürzlich – wenn ich richtig gezählt habe – auf 90 Uploads an nur einem Tag, wobei ihm Qualität und Relevanz vieler seiner Fotos von untergeordneter Bedeutung zu sein scheinen. Welchen Wert hat zum Beispiel das Bild dieses Peugeot? Die Schärfe ist zwar befriedigend und auch die Belichtung ist in Ordnung. Aber: Was hat das Foto sonst zu bieten (Bildgestaltung, Bildbearbeitung, enzyklopädische Relevanz)? Mit solchem Ehrgeiz Einzelner ist meines Erachtens der Allgemeinheit nicht gedient, oder doch? Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn, 2007.jpg

It seems like user PekKos / KosPek has caused yet another mixup. Have look at Image:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn, 2007.jpg. The new version seems to be original work by User:KosPek, see this description in his upload:

DescriptionSamulili	Bronze Soldier of Tallinn
Date	24.5.2008
Source	own work
Author	KosPek

The images are different, both have their own merits. Both images should be kept, under different names. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EU on kosovo independence.png

Hi,

I have protected this image because of a editwar. Since you worked on this image i would like to hear you opinion about what version should be used. The discussion can be found at Image talk:EU on kosovo independence.png

Thanks, Sterkebaktalk 17:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lauri torni.jpg

Hello!

Could you come to help me on this deletion request. User:Vesteri has uploaded several hundred older studio photographs of Finnish military personnel, and as we know, these studio photos are protected by the Finnish copyright. I would value your input. --MPorciusCato (talk) 16:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Knowledge German EU map.png

About the colour blindness on 'Image:Knowledge German EU map.png' which colours would be easier for colour blind people to see? Ameki (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Would you please post your answer on my page? Thanks :]

Image:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn, 2007.jpg

I have fully-protected this image for 2 weeks because of upload warring it appears you have participated in. Please discuss on the image talk page any outstanding issues. I will unprotect that image when the dispute is resolved. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Obama picture

Hi there, what happened actually? I don't think you did anything wrong, but why did your protection not work? I just don't understand. --Eusebius (talk) 12:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I think the protection was lost (?) when I accidentally deleted all versions of the file instead of just the vandalised ones? Samulili (talk) 12:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, yes. Protection does not look very consistent to me... Well, everything's fine. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 12:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Google/Yahoo/Mapquest toolbar question

I was wondering if you were satisfied by the responses to your question at Template talk:Places by decade. I didn't understand what you were suggesting might be done with a server side script. Perhaps you meant something like wikiminiatlas? This particular effort is exciting, and they no doubt have their hands full just getting basic free map functionality going. I expect as it matures the density of images in particular locations (eg. Paris/Venice/tourist destinations) will force attention on filtering features- eg those based on category set operations that can easily be performed with low cost sql operations. If so, then we'd get a Wayback machine for free, since we are already adding date categories to images. We aren't talking about any new datatype for timecodes- treating them as simple cats would give wikiminiatlas a cool historical spin. At that point, people will better appreciate the relevance of adding time cats to their images and articles (eg: Spans of time like 1930s) that infrogmation and I under a different alias have been working on for a while. That's not to say that encoding spans of time with timecodes wouldn't be useless- certainly time proximity searches and timespan intersections would be cool- eg show me all the images in the same period that Teddy Roosevelt was alive, or during the Hapsburg dynasty. Maybe some of the proximity code could be hacked to apply to timecode coordinates, but what the heck- It seems to me though that there are lower hanging fruit right now for the foundation. Unless there are few competent developers that are highly motivated about that sort of advanced scenario, it's just a lot of blue sky. My opinion is we just expose the time and space metadata and see what folks do with it. OTOH, maybe you didn't intend a question of this nature, and if so, then please ignore. -J JMesserly (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Torbiere del Sebino

Hi,

looks like we're working on the same page!

I noticed you reverted my adding it to a cat ('Peat', because that's what the place is about), but I realized only after I added it a second time (I thought I had messed it, I'm not starting an edit war!). I also added it to 'Nature reserves in Italy'.

Meanwhile you reverted 'Peat' once again: there must be some reason, but I can't see it!

If you wish, we can talk about it on this page, I'll check it for a while.

84.97.149.75 16:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to write to you, too, but you were quicker :) By en:peat, do you mean "an accumulation of partially decayed vegetation matter"? In that case, that category can not be in Category:Peat, because not all images in Category:Torbiere del Sebino are about peat. Samulili (talk) 16:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what I mean! Peat = Torba, Peat bog = Torbiera (pl. Torbiere, I guess). It's true you no longer see peat in the pictures, but the whole place is a former peat extraction site, now filled with water.

That's what the Italian cat header means: Area naturale che ha avuto origine dall'attività di estrazione della torba = natural area originated by peat extraction. So I think it's the place itself that should go into Cat:Peat, not the individual pics. It will be easier for users to understand why it is there, and also avoid seeing the pics if it's not what they want.

I also think it's better to avoid overcrowding of cats with individual pics - I've been fighting with that for the past few days ;-), overcrowding with subcats is not that bad.

Btw, I don't think you could have written me first as I'm just an unregistered IP! (unless there's some magic trick I'm unaware of...)

I see your point,but maybe you should use Category:Moorland, bog, swamp instead? Or, if you want to, you can create subcategories for Category:Peat. I, too, often find overcrowded categories annoying, and break them into subcategories. Samulili (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually Category:Peat is a subcat of Category:Moorland,... .

Commons policy encourages using the most specific cats; also, a user looking for peat will probably go to Category:Peat directly (through the search engine), or if they visit Category:Moorland... and don't know Latin languages, they will overlook Cat:Torbiere del Sebino.

And after all, create a subcat for Category:Peat is just what I was doing in the first place ;-)

Anyway, I leave it up to you, maybe you have a specific interest in that place? I don't, I'm just going through Category:Media lacking a description, trying to fix a few files or cats here and there.

File:Zapatero.jpg

File:Zapatero.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 18:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Russia-2008?uselang=fi

Terve,
as you can see, the Finnish version of this template links to fi:Russia (deleted) instead of fi:Venäjä, the actual article about Russia. I found no way to fix that, maybe it isn't even possible, so I thought it might be better to forward this to an admin :) Näkemiin • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) ^wtf? • 21:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ah, forgot about the note where I'd like an answer... 'twould be great if you could answer me on my own discussion page, if necessary :) • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) ^wtf? • 21:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great job, kiitos :) In cases of mistakes on language sensitive templates, is an administrator to be contacted in general? • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) ^wtf? • 13:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karl_Munchinger_StD_1969.jpg

Bonjour, Vous me demandez une utilisation pour la photo File:Karl_Munchinger_StD_1969.jpg En téléchargeant cette photo sur commons.wikimedia, j'avais bien précisé que cette photo avait été prise par nos soins, par notre équipe du CMI Bach. Nous l'avons d'ailleurs utilisée pour illustrer notre festival http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festival_international_Jean-S%C3%A9bastien_Bach_de_Saint-Donat-sur-l%27Herbasse Nous mettons cette photo dans le domaine public, comme je l'avais précisé et ce message doit tenir lieu d'autorisation. Pardonnez-moi mais je ne suis pas expert dans votre domaine Bien cordialement --musicmusic (talk) 09:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Je viens d'ajouter un intitulé sur ta message. Pardon, mais tu as oublié ;) • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) ^wtf? • 13:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas de nouvelles de Samulili à propos de mon explication ci-dessus... Est-elle suffisante pour valoir autorisation ? Merci de me répondre sur ma page de discussion. Merci et Bien cordialement. --musicmusic (talk) 17:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dali image

You might like to comment here, as you previously commented on this issue. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why did you revert this? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Rochellehudson.jpg&curid=5205387&diff=19201603&oldid=19201060. There's a regular DR on this image - and you know that! 92.227.81.36 09:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I read wrong and somehow thought you had removed the DR template, but it was actually the opposite. I'm sorry about my mistake. Samulili (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have seen you have reverted yourself. Thank you. Regards 92.227.81.36 11:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

German language image

You reverted and then protected a false image on the German language on commons. I have already addressed multiple issues (proof) months ago, as have others, (proof, proof, proof, proof) with this image on its talk page to which no one has yet responded. The image's creator Micheal Postmann, has been banned on the German Wikipedia for Nazism. (proof) It is an image that claims to be based on the German national census of 1910 but the image shows very large portions of territory outside the borders of the German Empire; in which the supposed national census took place and it claims the Dutch language was somehow German until 1910. Please revert the image my version, which has at least got the Dutch language removed (and secure it) or explain why you think the image (with mentioned source problems and nationalist/Neo-nazi creator) is accurate.B. Franken (talk) 12:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I say I think it's accurate? If you don't like, don't use it. If you think it doesn't have any potential educational use, nominate it for deletion. Afterall, our policies say: "Images having particular national, political or religious significance including flags, emblems and maps can arouse strong passions, but Commons is not the place to decide which of various competing versions is the correct or official version. If you feel strongly that a map, emblem, flag or other file hosted here is “wrong” in some way please try to persuade your local wiki community to make use of the version you prefer instead. -- Of course, if the author has made a factual mistake that is not seriously disputed, the image (if not in use) may fail the test of being useful for an educational purpose, and can be deleted on that basis." Samulili (talk) 12:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You never said anything at all. You just reverted and locked the page, forcing me to presume you agree. So don't blame me for that, if you'd made the effort to write a summary there would have been no misunderstanding. Commons has a duty to protect itself from harmful, suggestive and plainly wrong (i.e nationalist) files. I have already pointed out to you how and why the map is flawed (including links proving I'm not alone, and in fact form a majority on the images talk page) and given you an alternative more accurate and far less offensive version. Yet you still refuse to undo your actions; explain why.B. Franken (talk) 17:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don'r know if it's flawed or not. All I know - and all I care - is that there is no revert warring. We don't need that in Commons, we have Commons:Project scope to guide us. Samulili (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might not want edit warring but I don't want false representations. When you locked that image you locked it on the non-consensus, contested version (as I have proven to you through the links, and as is visible on the image's talk page. You made that choice. I don't care if you lock the image till kingdom come, but I will not (or ever) accept that that image is locked on the current (flawed) version. I have presented the problem, brought forward the evidence, and now its up to you to either adapt the image or bring forward a statement in which you make clear why the current version is supposedly better. B. Franken (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons does not necessarily aspire right or neutral point of view. Commons:Project scope. Samulili (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Historisches_deutsches_Sprachgebiet.PNG

Please do not add the Netherlands to the "deutsches Sprachgebiet". Dutch is not German, and it's not a German dialect either. They are similar but that's all. This is an image about the areas where people speak German, not languages similar to German. That would be like adding France and Spain to an image about "Areas where Italian is spoken". And as far as I know the Frisian language doesn't share anything with the German language so this should definitly be excluded from the image. Ah, apparently I wasn't the first to say this Ugjer (talk) 00:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of File:2000s.jpg

Hi Samulili, I have opened an undeletion request for File:2000s.jpg, of which you closed the deletion request as delete. Feel free to comment on the undeletion request, I would prefer to take the discussion there instead of your talk page. Best regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2nd deletion of a file I've posted

I find it hard to accept that the files I'm uploading have a copyright violation when I am the one who owns the copyright. I am the author of the product that the screen shot is from. I give this game away for free. It seems that there is some assumption that a developer never uploads their own work. I am the developer, it is my work and I want to upload it's screen shot image and I'm okay with making it public domain. Is there some sort of process I can follow so it doesn't keep getting deleted? John A. Reder (developer and owner of Tactical Neuronics and the A.I. Wars (The Insect Mind) Copyright) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redej0 (talk • contribs)

I'm sorry about the inconvencience and grief that I and User:Bayo have caused by deleting your work. We both seemed to miss that you (nick Redej0) are John A. Reder, although it seems quite obvious now that you think about. I have restored the image and I tried to fill in the information in a way that will most likely prevent other administrators from repeating our mistakes. Kind regards, Samulili (talk) 13:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

I have talked with an admin, Martin H. We agreed that all maps should be brought to the original state, as the original uploader made them (we also discussed a need for an out of scope policy for a certain map type about diplomatic missions, per my idea that was already approved on enWiki by admin Zscout370 and those locator maps are to be painted per this separate rule). If you have a problem with that please discuss the Commons policies, please take it with the admins involved as well because to my understanding it is an idea of admins that all kind of POV pushing that happened in the maps can be avoided by uploading alternative files that are different to the original (ie. Kosovo or whatever was added later) and by reverting original files to original versions. If you consider any revert a revert war then maybe you should take a more thorough approach. I had a lengthy discussion with several admins about this with many ideas and I'd like some appreciation. After almost 5 years on WP I might have shorter temper on some issues and I apologize for that but that happens only if someone is trying to fix the very complex situation quickly and over the line while my effort to solve it through serious means that require some involvement are not taken with necessary seriousness. One more thing, locking an image on your revert version is first of all bad because you are an involved party and second of all it's bad because your version doesn't correspond to the original image which is against the policy in such matters. However I do assume you had the best of intentions, that you didn't seek that outcome but the opposite however it turned out this way. For an example Martin H. made many reverts to those maps like you made one but I fixed some of them where he failed to revert to the original file version as he planned and he noted his error so there was no tension, just constructive atmosphere to solve the problem. Thanks.--Avala (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So?--Avala (talk) 13:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hello, I see that your the admin that blocked the image File:Historisches deutsches Sprachgebiet.PNG. I've listed that image for deletion, but can't add the "{{Delete}}" template to the image (it's now on the talk page) because you've protected it. Due to this, it's cause a template loop. Please fix it, thank you HP1740-B (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hepokullan kerrostaloja Tammispaltan puiston yli nähtynä, Vätti, Turku.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Photo permissions

Hello Samulili,

I got an e-mail notification via Wikipedia from you. I am not very firm to the images' licences, I have to send to a part of Wiki...

Two of the images (Standortfoto_Pori and Standortfoto_Duisburg)I used on the wikipedia page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sachtleben_Chemie belong to Sachtleben Chemie (and the right as well). The other one was put on this page by another user. I only corrected the third image on this page. This is an image of Kalerna, who gave the rights to manipulate this image as I did (as I understood the wiki permission rights)

So what can I do to give the right permissions to those images?

With best regards

— Preceding unsigned comment added by sccom (talk • contribs) - (UTC)

Deja vu all over again?

Hello, as you seem to know about the history of File:Historisches deutsches Sprachgebiet.PNG, which might be Commons' most frequently attacked file, and about the behavior of user Special:Contributions/B._Franken, I wonder whether the contributions of Special:Contributions/Rex_Germanus, Special:Contributions/Ugjer, Special:Contributions/HP1740-B are totally unrelated? BTW: is the email interface working properly? --Matthead (talk) 01:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question. They are of the same opinion but, in this case, I can see that many people would. And while their editing patterns are quite untypical for wikipedias, they are not unordinary on Commons.

My email should be working, I haven't tested it, though. Samulili (talk) 05:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yliopistonkatu 11, sisäpiha, Turku.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACC basical SVG tutorial.svg

Please restore this file. The SVG version being easier to edit than the PNG one, the SVG have to be keep. thanks. Yug (talk) 01:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you want the image to be restored? It seems to me that the image is broken. At least the GIFs don't work. Samulili (talk) 08:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, restore it. The display on commons may be broken, the file should be file when open in Inkscape or SVG softwares. Restore ;) Yug (talk) 09:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Add something in the description to prevent someone else from deleting it again. Please also place the image in a category. Samulili (talk) 10:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mahinda_Rajapakse.jpg

Why was this deleted? The website is clearly marked as public domain. No further explicit permission is required. --Snowolfd4 (talk) 15:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Vexi Salmi.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vexi Salmi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Question on change of color palette

You left the message: “I can't see the difference between light blue and purple.” about the image File: Big_brother_countries.png. I changed the color palette to a monochromatic blue and I am hoping you can clarify if the color change is sufficient.

As for your talk page note: I don't care how you respond to my message, it is fine wether you contact me here or on my talk page.

Wgabrie (talk) 21:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish m/05 pattern

Hello,

as you are the foremost Finnish copyright expert, I'd like to get your opinion on these files:

File:M05 woodland pattern.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:M05 cold pattern.jpg‎ (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:M05 snow pattern.jpg‎ (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:M05 woodland pattern.jpg‎ (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

These files were uploaded by en:User:Blankku, who has repeatedly uploaded images with false copyright tags. In this case, he claimed this to be PD-self, while the pattern has been created by Pekka Vilhunen. However, although these would normally qualify for copyright, the images in question are stored into Mallinetti database: [21] as samples of a protected design. So, I think these clearly qualify for design protection (mallisuoja). However, if these are protected by design protection, the same images don't qualify for copyright. (The usual Finnish doctrine is that intellectual property may not be simultaneously covered by patent, design protection or copyright; only one of them may apply at a time.) So, I'd say that

if the images are protected by design protection, they are PD in the copyright sense.
even if the design qualified for copyright protection, these images are part of the decision of the Patentti- ja Rekisterihallitus to grant the design protection for the design. So, these fall under {{PD-FinlandGov}}.

For the moment, I've used the latter rationale to tag the images. However, we might need to delete these images, if my reasoning is incorrect. What do you think? --MPorciusCato (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my late reply. I wouldn't consider them decisions or statements, so PD-FinlandGov doesn't apply, in my opinion. However, I've understood that the patterns are created "mathematically". While the mathematics are complex, the patterns as such may not include such human creativity which can be copyrighted. Samulili (talk) 15:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Samulili!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 01:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Riyhad03.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

No license -mallineen suomennos

Hei! Voisitko tarkastaa, onko käännökseni kunnossa, ja lisätä sitten linkin käännökseen suojatulle sivulle Template:No_license/lang. --Herra Maka (talk) 10:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja samaan syssyyn: Voisitko tehdä No license -mallineesta automaattisesti suomentuvan/kääntyvän (kuten esim. Template:No source since), kun ei se näyttänyt sitä vielä olevan. --Herra Maka (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Language policy

Hi, in an effort to move the Commons:Language policy closer to completion, I have been editing it and cleaning it up for the last few days. I have tried to make the page as neutral and consistent as possible with the relevant policy and guidleine pages that it cross references.

I would appreciate it, as someone who has discussed some of these policies in the past, if you could look at Commons talk:Language policy and contribute your thoughts. This is the version that exists as I am writing it and I am encouraging everyone to consider the "static" page until everything gets sorted out.

Many thanks. Evrik (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

File:Notredame.jpg

BotMultichillT 21:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AmSteam pics

Hi, my pics are deleted cause I added the photographers names (just as info) to the descriptions. I represent those who took the pics. How to prove that they are copyright free to be added to Wikipedia? AmSteam (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bit more details see at AmSteam's talk-page. -- Cecil (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Silent People

Please check the category Category: The Silent People according to Finnish copyright law. Thank you. Please reply on my page. --Hapesoft (talk) 20:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ascorbic_acid_2.png

File:Ascorbic_acid_2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 16:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Samulili. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 08:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:WSTM Team Dustizeff 0107.jpg

Hi Samulili.
I have just some questions about the deletion process.
1) What about the duplicated images? Eg. WSTM Mark Frank 0088.jpg and WSTM Mark Frank 0089.jpg or WSTM Zefferus 0061.jpg, WSTM Zefferus 0062.jpg and WSTM Zefferus 0063.jpg. Do we really need such duplicates? In the first example the first image seems to be wiggly so why not delte this image?
2) What about images like The Squirrels 0023.jpg which show a sculpture in the USA? (no FOP in the USA for Artwork)
thanks for your answer --D-Kuru (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sysop tools removed

Español

I am writing to let you know that as you did not signed at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2010 within the permitted 30 day period your admin rights have been removed for inactivity, as required by our policy. We very much appreciate the work you have done here, and hope you will feel free to re-apply for admin rights if at some time in the future you feel able to contribute again. -- 15 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Trinitrotoluene.gif

File:Trinitrotoluene.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request notification

Hi, you participated in a deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/Wikipe-tan lolicon (2007-01-04). The same files are now being considered for undeletion at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:LoliWikipetan.jpg. If you're still around we'd appreciate your opinion and feedback. Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 23:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Aloittajan_ohjeet

Commons:Aloittajan_ohjeet has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Greenwoods (talk) 15:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saaronniemi.jpg in wiki en-commons

Saaronniemi.jpg is from Ruissalon kansanpuisto.

Horn of Africa

Please, have a look to File:Horn1915ad.png, File:Horn1930ad.png, and File:Horn1960ad.png, and tell me if the colors are adequate. Thanks (please answer on my page).--GianniG46 (talk) 16:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kaakkois-Suomen linnoitusketju.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kaakkois-Suomen linnoitusketju.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Kaakkois-Suomen linnoitusketju.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Nelg (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anarkvappu2005PK.jpg

File:Anarkvappu2005PK.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Apalsola ^{t • c} 19:31, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Mezcal bottles.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alpha tocopehrol, vertical.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alpha tocopehrol, vertical.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Alpha tocopehrol, vertical.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tetrahydrobiopterin.png

File:Tetrahydrobiopterin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 22:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question about image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phanerozoic_Climate_Change.png

I wonder if the curve is correctly aligned with the geological time scale? I have understood that Permian peak at temperature was at Permian/Triassic border rather than middle of the Permian (look for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian%E2%80%93Triassic_extinction_event: "around the P–Tr boundary suggests an 8 °C (14 °F) rise in temperature"). Also in the current figure the Carboniferous-Permian glaciation is _overlaping_ this very high tempererature peak.

- Akauko

PS. I'm new with commenting Wikipedia. I hope I do this correctly... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akauko (talk • contribs) 09:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of dance of Zalongo.jpg

File:Statue of dance of Zalongo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 19:13, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Messier 017 2MASS.jpg

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lansimetro.gif

File:Lansimetro.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 01:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puryvic acid.png

File:Puryvic acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GKFX^talk 19:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phenylhydrazine.gif

File:Phenylhydrazine.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 21:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cholecalsiferol, simpler structure.png

File:Cholecalsiferol, simpler structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 21:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suomen murteet tekstein.jpg

File:Suomen murteet tekstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Zone tim (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suomen murteet.jpg

File:Suomen murteet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Zone tim (talk) 19:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Viru Hotel from Tammsaare park.jpg

And also:

File:Viru Hotel.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imidazole.png

File:Imidazole.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 22:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urea large.png

File:Urea large.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 22:32, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tammela

Tammela has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb at the English Cemetery, Florence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sigmur

Category:Sigmur is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]