User talk:Tomas.urban
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
CoA Žamberk
[edit]Kolego, musím ti pochválit pěkné znaky Krajů, povedly se ti. Nic ve zlém, ale naopak ti musím vytknout znak města Žamberka, který neodpovídá popisu. Orlice má na kanci stát a má zlaté pařáty. I když je tvůj znak líbivější a jeho barvy více korespondují s barvami praporu, musel jsem editaci Ragimiriho na stránce http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%BDamberk revertovat na starý. --Bohemianroots 19:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
CoA Žamberk
[edit]Tome podívej se na http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/%C5%BDamberk, kde jsou vedle sebe starý znak a tvůj nový znak Žamberka. Nevím, jak má mít v heraldice Münsterberská orlice barvy, ale tady je vidět rozdíl. Zdraví Bohemianroots 07:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
rixdorf
[edit]Zdravím. Na dotaz u mne na cs.source musím odpovědět spíš negativně. Já udělal pár fotek protože jsem původně začql psát článek o tom hřbitově, když mi ale pár lidí pokazilo žaludek tak jsem toho nechal a dál jsem žádné rešerše neděl a co jsem měl smazal. Snad by ale google něco vyhodil. Mnoho zdaru při hledání, -jkb- 15:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Bistumswappen
[edit]Hallo Tomas, für die Seiten Römisch-katholische Diözesen in der Slowakei Bratislava | Trnava | Banská Bystrica | Nitra | Žilina | Košice | Rožňava | Spiš suche ich die Bistumswappen. Kannst Du die in di Wikimedia Commons einstellen? grüsse--Ekpah (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ahoj Tomáš, ďakujem, že si splnil Ekpahovu žiadosť o erby biskupov. Neurobil si všetky (pozri galériu) a tie, ktoré si urobil, používajú čudnú šablónu. GiMa38 robí erby biskupov bez insígnií, čo je dobrá cesta, lebo insígnie sa môžu meniť (keď sa biskup stane arcibiskupom alebo kardinálom). Po súhlase biskupa Lacha som uploadol jeho oficiálny erb podľa tvojej konvencie názvu. Keď budem mať súhlasy ďalších biskupov, môžem nahrádzať tvoje erby oficiálnymi verziami? Alebo mám zvoliť iné názvy? Prípadne sa spoj s GiMa38 a AnonMoosom na tejto diskusii. Hosmich (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- Zdravím ešte raz. Po súhlase niektorých biskupov som začal nahrádzať tvoje verzie erbov gréckokatolíckych biskupov na Slovensku oficiálnymi verziami. Tvoju šablónu strapcov som nenašiel nikde inde na Wikimedii a v kombinácii s byzantským plášťom nie je najlepšia. Mám v atribúte "Autor" ponechať meno teba ako prvého uploadera erbu na Commons? Alebo ho mám nahradiť menom autora oficiálneho stvárnenia? PS: Tu je erb Jozefa Viktora Adamca, ktorý na projektoch Wikimedie nie je. On, ako aj Dominik Kaľata a Ján Bukovský chýbajú v mojej galérii. Ak ich nahráš na Commons, môžeme ich obaja pridať do svojich galérií. Hosmich (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Zdravím. Nahrazování mých znaků za ofic. znaky se nebráním. Jen jsem se snažil znakům dát jednotný vzhled. Šablona s církevními insigniemi na wikipedii je, ale zdála se mi jednoduchá, tak jsem si vytvořil vlastní. Prože docházelo ke zneužívání mých obecních znaků ve formátu SVG začal jsem obrázky dávat ve formátu JPG, tudíž jsem na wiki šablonu nedával.--Tomas.urban (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ďakujem za vyjadrenie. Chápem, že si chcel použiť jednu šablónu pre všetkých biskupov. Gréckokatolícki biskupi na Slovensku (okrem Milana Lacha) však už majú spoločnú šablónu, ktorej autorom je Zdenko Alexy z Bratislavy. Momentálne čakám na vyjadrenie Bratislavskej eparchie, pretože bez neho nechcem nahradiť tento erb Petra Rusnáka verziou podľa Alexyho šablóny. Okrem Milana Lacha v tvojej galérii chýbajú aj Ján Orosch a Jozef Haľko a niektoré erby majú nesprávne určené roky. Na mojej stránke sú správne údaje, možno okrem Jozefa Tomka a Dominika Hrušovského, kde neviem, či pri povýšení menili štít. Marián Chovanec však po inštalácii do Banskej Bystrice erb nezmenil a preto ho môžeš vo svojej galérii presunúť. PS: Vieš, odkiaľ je User:GiMa38? Na Commons talku mi neodpovedá. Hosmich (talk) 08:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Zdraví User:GiMa38. Nie, že by som nechcel odpovedať, ale komunikačné nástroje (diskusie, ...) neviem používať, tak radšej nepíšem, aby som nerobil kiksy. Keďže na wiki píšem prvýkrát do diskusie, snáď technicky nie chybne. Som z Bratislavy. User:Hosmich, v galérii možno doplniť arcibiskupský erb J. Oroscha: File:COA_archbishop_SK_Orosch_Jan.png. Oceňujem prepracovanie erbov do svg. To, že kreslím len štíty je presne z toho dôvodu, ako uviedol User:Hosmich - ak sa z biskupa stane arcibiskup a neskôr kardinál, pričom obsah štítu nezmení, netreba meniť obrázok. GiMa38(talk) 02 April 2014
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 04:36, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Arcibiskup Duka Dominik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Filo Vladimir 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Filo Vladimir 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Filo Vladimir 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 22:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Galis Tomáš CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Galis Tomáš old CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Vokál Jan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Vokál Jan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Macucal (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Vokál Jan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biskup Vlastimil Kročil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
185.33.137.2 07:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Znak Doks
[edit]Dobrý den, můžu se zeptat, proč má znak File:Doksy CoA CZ.svg zlaté špricle? Podle blasonu má být (celý) červený. Předem díky za odpověď. Gumruch (talk) 15:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Zdravím. Vycházel jsem ze znaku rodu Bredů, kteří tuto obec vlastnili.--Tomas.urban (talk) 05:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Tomas.urban,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 14:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Tomas.urban,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Tomas.urban,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Dobrý den, rád bych se zeptal: Vy jste skutečně autorem znaků obcí okresu Teplice, Most a dalších? nebo jste to odněkud zkopíroval? Pak by to byl trochu licenční problém. --Gampe (talk) 17:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Zdravím. Zdroj znaků je internet, ale každý znak překresluji. Používám své figury a barvy. Dát znaky do tohoto přehledu je můj nápad a moje tvorba. Tomas.urban (talk) 14:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Znak arcibiskupa Vaňáka
[edit]Milý kolego, dovoluju si upozornit na drobnou chybu ve znaku arcibiskupa Vaňáka - motto správně zní Eritis... Vizte http://heraldikus.wz.cz/cirkeverb/olomoucarcibis/olomoucbis6.htm, kde je sice obrázek rovněž s touto chybou, ale v blasonu je to správně. Z české wikipedie pěkně zdraví Gottschalk (talk) 17:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Znak Vinoře
[edit]Dobrý den, prosím, mohl byste nahradit znak MČ Praha - Vinoř? Na Wikipedii je znak, který sice základní symboly používá dobře (klíče, hrozny), ale ten pravý znak se liší v detailech klíčů i v počtu kuliček vína na hroznu i jeho tvaru. Oficiální znak Vinoře můžete stáhnout zde: www.praha-vinor.cz. Díky moc. Martin Mach Macon~cswiki (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Opraveno Tomas.urban (talk) 09:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Brno-venkov I přehled.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Brno-venkov I přehled.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brno-venkov I přehled.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gampe (talk) 07:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Brno-venkov II přehled.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Brno-venkov II přehled.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brno-venkov II přehled.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gampe (talk) 07:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.Gampe (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.