User talk:Gumruch

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gumruch!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Gumruch!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File deletion warning File:Charlotta_Garrigue_Masarykova_054.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Miraceti (talk) 11:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File deletion warning File:Charlotte_Garrigue_Masarykova_011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Miraceti (talk) 11:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File deletion warning File:Charlotta_Garrigue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Miraceti (talk) 11:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Olgoj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Mormegil (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Blob_jako_politické_téma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huib talk 20:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Elviz_195123456789.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Elviz_195123456789.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Elviz_195123456789.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 18:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Street category names

[edit]

Ahoj. Mám drobnou připomínku ke kategorii "Husova ulice (Semily)". Podle mého názoru je lépe do názvu kategorie dávat pouze to, co se v mapách používá jako označení ulice (tedy v tomto případě pouze slovo "Husova"). Mimo jiné se tím také vyhneme problému, zda ten dovětek psát česky nebo anglicky (t. j. zda "Husova Street" nebo "Husova ulice"). Jen výjimečně v některých městech používají třeba slovo "třída" jako pevnou součást názvu některé ulice. Jiný případ jsou náměstí, kde slovo "náměstí" je používáno jako neoddělitelná část označení a tedy jej nelze psát samotné, např. "Masarykovo". --ŠJů (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Při vytváření kategorie jsem hledal vzor a jednoznačný jsem nenašel. Co teď s tím, mám požádat o přesun kategorie? --Gumruch (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Když už je to založené, tak bych na změnu nespěchal. Řešil bych to teprve až těch kategorií bude v Semilech víc. Vzory bych hledal nejspíše v kategoriích velkých českých měst (ale v případě Prahy je to zase komplikované s tím, zda český název ulice kombinovat s anglickým názvem města). Žádat o přejmenování je vždycky riskantní: i proto, že hlavní roli v přejmenovávání kategorií má jistý Vlám, který má na používání českých vlastních jmen v názvech kategorií poněkud extrémní názory. --ŠJů (talk) 11:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holečkova

[edit]

Ahoj. Mám drobnou připomínku. Pokud zakládáš kategorii pro nějakou ulici, tak si předtím orientačně ověř, jestli neexistují ulice téhož jména i v jiným městech (někdy je to jasné i bez ověřování) a pokud ano, tak kategorii založ rovnou i z rozlišovačem. Ušetříme si tím do budoucna zbytečně stěhování a předejdeme tak tomu, že by se v jedné kategorii smíchaly snímky z různých měst. Taky jsem to dříve nedělal, ale snad už nás vývoj poučil, že je dobré předvídat. --ŠJů (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Byl jsem na vážkách, protože některé ulice v Praze rozlišovač mají, jiné ne. Odvodil jsem, že jde o častost ulic – Plzeňská a Bratislavská budou jistě v každém druhém městě, Holečkových jen pár, takže tam by bez rozlišovače mohla být ta v hlavním městě. Ale od příště to tedy už budu dělat systematicky s rozlišovačem. Ahoj, Gumruch (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tie betwen Reinhold Ewald and Tintin

[edit]

Hallo Gumruch, where is a connection betwen Reinhold Ewald and Tintin? He's an astronaut. ;-) --Alkab (talk) 12:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at it—Ewald wears a necktie presenting a motive with Tintin and Snowy and their rocket. --Gumruch (talk) 12:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Mormegil (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obecní dům - Šalounova deska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough to be readable, useful. --Cayambe 19:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zdeněk Tůma - 12 června 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 19:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chodovský hřbitov - Emil Hadač.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jiří Všetečka - listopad 2009a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Václav Riedlbauch nad Prahou 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vincenc Makovský - Nový věk Praha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments tilt/distortion must be corrected --Mbdortmund 20:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)  Info Updated–tried to fix. --Gumruch 19:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC) not so bad, despite of the horrible background, not your fault. I think it's a QI.--Jebulon 22:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bohemia1590 1609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jiří Komorous duben 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --AleXXw 06:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chodov - Václav Frydecký - Sova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zora Jandová 2009a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good portrait. --Cayambe 14:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bischofjoachimreinelt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 04:39, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lukáš Hurník 2010-11-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 11:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robert Reichel 2010-10-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 11:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vojtěch Cepl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Bo Carpelan

[edit]

Hallo, You nominated this photo: for VI and after some research I tend to support. But, there is a rule every image to be geotagged. In other words, the camera coordinates should be shown. The description of the photo tells that this is in Helsinki but can you find more specifically where exactly in the city?--MrPanyGoff 07:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have asked the author. Let’s hope he will geocode it. --Gumruch (talk) 08:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion notification Category:Stamps has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bo Carpelan (1926–2011).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 20:03, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

[edit]

Thank you for new download file:Ridec znak.jpg. Please sea of http://obecpaseka.cz Top left is a magnificent coat of arms for cs:Paseka (okres Olomouc). Unfortunately i can not upload it because. I did not address the source file in the source code of the website find. Maybe I'm too stupid. :) Can you help? Sorry --AHZ (talk) 21:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, the coat is a part of background, it can be only extracted from http://obecpaseka.cz/img/header1.jpg. Better place for finding Czech coats of arms is usually REKOS, see Paseka. Unfortunately over past few years they have inserted files of a poor quality, I guess they re-scan printed artwork sent from municipalities – see Řídeč. Sincerely --Gumruch (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you very much --AHZ (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: svgcheck

[edit]

Thanks for your message. I have now looked at the issue again, and pinpointed the error - the use of custom entity references in the Doctype specification. Which is a stupid idea all around.

I shall add it to svgcheck shortly. Regards, Jarry1250 (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavel Vrba.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bořivoj Navrátil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Hello Gumruch!

Thanks for your edit in in this image: you have added Category:Milada Horáková. My question: is Milada Horáková shown on the image between the Jan Palach and Jan Zajic? Thanks for your support. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 08:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a sticker with one of her famous photos (see here), text is imho readable: † 27. 6. 1950 Dr. Milada Horák–. I think the sticker was placed here for a long time (many months). Best regards, Gumruch (talk) 20:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for these interesting facts. I linked the portrait-sticker in the image accordingly. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:One_Million_Canadian_Dollar_Coin_-_2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kobac (talk) 10:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikihvězda za vektorizaci

[edit]

Jako poděkování za velkou pomoc při nahrávání SVG verzí znaků městských obvodů a místních částí ti uděluji tuto wikihvězdu za vektorizaci. :) --Ragimiri (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Český Brod

[edit]

Ahoj, k tomuto souboru bych měl pár připomínek: orlice by měla mít červené jazyky a zlaté pařáty, nikoliv černé a stříbrné. I ten lvíček je takový trochu podivný, i když z hlediska blasonování je to OK. Tak či onak, oficiální verze je zde, takže můžeš opravovat. :) --Ragimiri (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj! Já jsem hned poprosil Podzemnika o přejmenování, na tuhle šablonu jsem zapomněl. Díky! Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 03:50, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vlajka Karlína

[edit]

Kdosi nechal sloučit tebou nahraný soubor File:Flag of Prague Karlín.svg (archiv) se Zirlandovým souborem File:Flag of Prague 7.svg, což mi nepřipadá jako dobrý nápad - to už by to rovnou mohli sloučit i s polskou vlajkou a s porevoluční českou vlajkou. Bohužel ani jeden z Vás jste neuvedli v infoboxu zdroj, odkud jste přišli na to, že zrovna takto by měla vypadat vlajka Karlína či Prahy 7, a do článků jsou tyto vlajky přidány také bez jakéhokoliv zdroje. Na webu Prahy 7 žádnou vlajku nevidím a vlajku či prapor Karlína se mi Googlem také nepodařilo najít. Admin, který oba obrázky sloučil, navíc zřejmě ani nevěděl, že Praha 7 je zcela jiná část Prahy než Karlín. A ke všemu na parlamentním webu přes léto stávkují a nefunguje jim REKOS. Mohl bys do situace vnést jasno? Dík. --ŠJů (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj, omlouvám se, jsem na počítači teď málo a hlavně nárazově. V knize o českých znacích jsem to teď nenašel (myslel jsem, jestli to tam nebylo zmíněno např. ve spojitosti s plachtou a praporkem na znaku), takže buď to byla informace odněkud z webu, nebo z nějaké vlastivědné knihy. Nicméně zařídím obnovení souboru, předpokládám, že jsem tam zdroj uvedl. REKOS už funguje na nové adrese (Praha 7), chci na naší Wiki i tady na Commons poprosit botovodiče o aktualizaci externích odkazů. Btw předpokládám, že v sobotu půjdeš na den otevřených dveří nafotit stanici metra Motol? :-) Gumruch (talk) 23:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravím, nevíš o oné odkazované mapě (nahrané již v roce 2008) víc, než jsi uvedl? Je "dost podobná" Orteliově kopii Johanna Crigingera, jenže se poněkud odlišuje a trochu matoucí jsou i ty roky (jestli si dobře všímám, tak započínáš GLAM Mapová sbírka PřF UK, tak by se to v rámci mohlo lépe identifikovat - zvláště pokud se ti teď ta mapa válí v soukromé sbírce, jak "vyplývá" :-) ze současného popisu). S pozdravem --marv1N (talk) 15:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj, bohužel víc nevím a ta mapa z antikvariátu se teď válí ve sbírce někoho jiného, já ji jen skenoval. Ohledně digitalizace mapové sbírky je nejlepší se obracet na Gampeho, já jsem teď jen pasivní fanoušek GLAMu. Zdravím, Gumruch (talk) 18:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tak nic. --marv1N (talk) 18:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Čestmír Šimáně.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
File:Rocio Durcal 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LMLM (talk) 10:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relikviáře

[edit]

Ahoj, odstranil jsem Category:Roman Catholic shrines in the Czech Republic z Category:Reliquaries in the Czech Republic. Ne všechny relikviáře musejí být automaticky románské - možná to mělo být kategorizované s opačnou posloupností(?) nebo bude třeba kategorii románských relikviářů přiřadit konkrétním položkám, k nimž časově patří. --Xth-Floor (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No tak to odstranění byla chyba, protože to znamená římskokatolické, což všechny budou; u protestantských církví nevím o tom, že by svaté uctívali a shromažďovali nějaké relikvie. Kategorizaci jsem udělal podle odbobné francouzské kategorie a logicky by měla být v nějaké „české“ kategorii, ne jen v kategorii „podle země“. Gumruch (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, tak to jsem si špatně vyložil. Kategorii tedy vrátím, byť za předpokladu neexistence jiných než řimskokatolických relikviářů v ČR bude asi redundantní. Pěkný zbytek víkendu. --Xth-Floor (talk) 11:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Shakespeare Theatre Company's production of Pericles.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

[edit]

Hi, when you report copyvios, please give the cause why they should be copyvios. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, imho these are so obvious, I checked it using Google images tab. They are spread on the web so it is hard to find the original link. I did not find how to report massive copyvios from one user. Gumruch (talk) 15:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Béla Iványi-Grünwald - Kytice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Přejmenování kategorie

[edit]

Zdravím. Pokud přejmenováváš kategorii (ať už z jakéhokoliv důvodu) tak do původní kategorie vždy uváděj odkaz na novou kategorii, kam jsi obsah přestěhoval (buď jako měkké přesměrování, nebo do odůvodnění žádosti o smazání). Nejen že tím usnadníš mazajícímu správci orientaci v problému, ale zároveň mu pomůžeš, aby se odkaz na novou kategorii mohl objevit v mazacím logu, takže pokud v některých projektech zůstal odkaz na starý název, uživateli se zobrazí odkaz na aktuální kategorii. --ŠJů (talk) 16:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Já nic nepřesouval, to je spíš na Gortynu, já přišel k prázdné kategorii. Je to pár dnů stará kategorie s evidentním překlepem, tak jsem doufal, že zvenku není odnikud linkována. Jinak souhlasím. Gumruch (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krobotova Krobot.JPG

[edit]

Ahoj! Zařazení fotky File:Krobotova Krobot.JPG do kategorie Category:Families of the Czech Republic považuji za trošku zavádějící, protože na snímku žádná rodina zobrazena není. Jsou tam dva příbuzní otec a dcera. Správněji by to asi mohlo být category:relatives či category:fathers and daughters, pokud by taková existovala... Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon, existuje! rekategorizováno. --Gampe (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, dík, třeba časem založím podkategorii pro české příbuzné/části rodin. Já osobně tedy takovouto kategorizaci, kdy jsou spolu vyfoceni encyklopedicky významní příbuzní, považuji za užitečnou. Gumruch (talk) 10:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Šotek

[edit]

Ahoj, díky za opravu šotka, i když Kvítková je taky hezké příjmení... :)--Kacir (talk) 02:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Velim CoA CZ.gif

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Velim CoA CZ.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Havlová

[edit]

Zdravím, k tomuto smazání obrázku, nedošel mezitím do OTRS mail od Výboru dobré vůle - Nadace Olgy Havlové? Byl jsem s nimi v kontaktu, říkali, že to posílali (byť asi trochu později než by bylo vhodné). --Vojtěch Veselý (talk) 17:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj, nejsem členem OTRS týmu (zkus Podzemnika nebo Harolda), ale zřejmě ne. Nicméně pokud dojde dodatečně, správci jsou schopni soubor obnovit. Gumruch (talk) 20:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Já nevím, OTRS jsem poslední cca 2 týdny nesledoval a zrovna včera odpoledne jsem ukončil svoji tamní činnost, takže už tam přístup nemám. Jinak Podzemnik by členem OTRS měl pořád být, kromě toho je i správce tady na Commons, takže fotku může případně obnovit. --Harold (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:H Kvitka.gif

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:H Kvitka.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Statue Rocio Durcal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

LMLM (talk) 05:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue Rocio Durcal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LMLM (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hram Vaskrsenja Hristovog u Karakaju, Zvornik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hram Vaskrsenja Hristovog u Karakaju, Zvornik.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hrob Martina Friče

[edit]

Pane kolego, pouze se zeptám: proč?--Alena Pokorná (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Hystrix (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Hystrix (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanislav Kasík - podpis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mates (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Czech?

 
Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 15:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Řazení jmen v kategorii dle příjmení

[edit]

Dobrý den. Potřebuji portréty seřadit dle příjmení, kategorie se 400 portréty se stala málo přehledná. Připravuji si případné příští rozdělení do subkategorií. Vymazal jsem asi dvě zařazení People of Czechia..., protože jsem to považoval za umělou a nesmyslnou kategorii. I po zběžné kontrole podobných kategorií mi zcela uniká smysl jejich existence.--NoJin (talk) 20:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean Gabin Touchez Pas au Grisbi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish 07:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creator:Luděk Kovář has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this creator, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen (keep talking) 05:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coat of arms of Bruntál.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coat of arms of Bruntál.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 06:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File Deletion

[edit]

Hi Gumruch,

regarding this message. Can you please check the history of the deleted file, because I do not remember that I ever upoloaded this file. It's not my "line of work". Regards, Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 20:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wo st 01: Hi, probably you reuploaded a cropped version of a file by another user and the system here informs all uploaders concerned. I am not an admin so I can not check it now. As I remember the source was http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/images/bio_q-muna.jpg (dated 1999) and the {{PD-old}} tag (70 years after author’s death) was used by the uploader. Regards, Gumruch (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Trebsko znak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Relax Liči exotika.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: per COM:PACKAGING
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Czech refugees from the Sudetenland 2.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 16:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prosba o aktualizaci mapky

[edit]

Ahoj, dobrý den. Obracím se na tebe jako na autora poslední verze mapky File:European union emu map en.png. Já osobně s výrobou map nemám žádné zkušenosti. Akualizace by měla zachytit, že Chorvatsko a Bulharsko již jsou zapojeny do ERM II a měly by být oranžovou barvou. Předem díky. (Zřejmě bych mohl žádost napsat i na Commons:Graphic Lab/Map workshop, ale takto to bude snad rychlejší a pohotovější - už jen pro to, že můžu psát česky a netrápit s mojí neoblíbenou angličtinou. Na commons jsem narazil na dost mapek vnitřního dělení států, které jsou již neaktuální, protože se vytvořily např. nové kraje, provincie apod, ale nevím, jak efektivně dosáhnout aktuazace. Já jsem v tomto zcela nepoužitelný. Máš nějaký tip?) --Unpocoloco (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unpocoloco: Ahoj, aktualizováno. To ostatní bych spíš směřoval do hospody. Já nestíhám všechny místní novinky sledovat… Gumruch (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editace

[edit]
@Gumruch: Co si to dovoluješ přejmenovávat cizí uploadované soubory? --ThecentreCZ (talk) 10:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative!

[edit]
Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative!

Hi Gumruch, Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative with your signature! Maybe you know another Wikipedian who'd like to sign as well? :-) --Gnom (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File:Olga Li RFERL 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Seydler.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Seydler.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Seydler.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Andel (talk) 06:31, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 13:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

úpravy autorství fotografií

[edit]

Dobrý den, vše jsem ocitoval, tak jak si autoři fotografií přáli. Všichni mi poskytli souhlas se zveřejněním. Jak to mohu uvést na pravou míru? Děkuji. viz info zde: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Casudost?markasread=39848916&markasreadwiki=commonswiki#Files_uploaded_by_Casudost_(talk_%C2%B7_contribs) Casudost (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Casudost: Je potřeba postupovat podle návodu na stránce Commons:OTRS, pokud to není dostatečně jasné, koukněte na českou Wikipedii – w:cs:Nápověda:Svolení autora#Uvolnění souborů na Wikimedia Commons​. Tj. každý autor napíše e-mail s výčtem fotek a souhlasem se zveřejněním pod konkrétní svobodnou licencí. Je to nezbytné, protože Commons přijímá pouze svobodný obsah, tj. soubory, které může (při dodržení licenčních podmínek) použít kdokoliv pro jakýkoliv účel, např. včetně komerčního použití. Nejde tedy jen o nějaké „ilustrování Wikipedie“. Proto použití jakéhokoliv souboru z Commons, který byl nahrán bez souhlasu skutečného autora (vlastníka autorských práv), může někoho přivést do nemilé situace včetně právních oplétaček… Děkuji za pochopení. Gumruch (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Gabriela-rochallyi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jil Teichmann photo

[edit]

Hi! I saw you changed white balance and exposure for photo of Jil Teichmann. I'm wondering is there some tool on Wikimedia Commons for doing this or you done it somewhere else and uploaded it here? Sorry, I don't know so much about these licences stuffs and Wikimedia Commons in general. JamesAndersoon (talk) 12:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesAndersoon: Hi, I have no info about such a tool. I use Adobe Photoshop to edit images or import RAW files. As I noticed, the original uploader does not wish the file to be overwritten, so I uploaded it as a new file. Sincerely Gumruch (talk) 17:36, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gumruch: Thank you! JamesAndersoon (talk) 11:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

World War II memorials of the Red Army has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 20:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dietmar Grieser.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dietmar Grieser.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ST 16:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Cleanup Barnstar
This Special Barnstar is awarded to Gumruch by Gampe: Thank You for your everyday work. Gampe (talk) 12:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Zdeněk Kaloč 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Ruzbeh.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanislav Zindulka PA115263.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 85.160.6.37.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zdeňka Hledíková patří do kategorie archivářůǃ

[edit]

Dobrý den, nemažte mi kategorii archiváři, prof. Hledíková se nerada fotila a bez té kategorie ji málokdo najde. Děkuji Dobroš (talk) 23:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dobroš: Celá kategorie Zdeňka Hledíková už je v kategorii Category:Archivists from the Czech Republic, tam by měly být jen jednotlivé fotky osob, které nemají vlastní kategorii. Viz Commons:Kategorie. Jinak se obraťte na hospodu, nebudu Vám dokola vysvětlovat úplné základy, jen mě okrádáte o čas. Navíc vykřičník v názvu tématu vnímám jako neslušný až útočný… :-((( Gumruch (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bezkov znak.JPG

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bezkov znak.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bezkov znak.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Thank you for updating the file. A09 (talk) 13:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zapojte se do Mikrosoutěže architektura 2023

[edit]

Vážení a milí fotografové a fotografky,

protože jste se nedávno zapojili do některé z našich fotografických soutěžích, zvu vás k účasti na Mikrosoutěži architektura 2023. Tato soutěž se zaměřuje na dokumentování nenafocených staveb a jejich detailů. Fotografie můžete nahrát na Commons do 15. března 2023. Hrajeme o poukaz na foto-služby.

Více informací najdete na stránce Mikrosoutěž architektura 2023.

Díky, že fotíte!

S přáním dobrého světla,

Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) (diskuse) 16:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2012 05 14 Патриарх УГКЦ Блаженнейший Святослав Шевчу.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Author І.А.Козловський
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Микола Василечко (talk) 18:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2012 05 14 Патриарх УГКЦ Блаженнейший Святослав Шевчу.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2012 05 14 Патриарх УГКЦ Блаженнейший Святослав Шевчу.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

King of ♥ 00:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for your systematic and persistent work to improve the quality of Wikimedia Commons. Gampe (talk) 04:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[edit]

Dobrý den, prosím o řešení svolení s poblikováním na commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Navr%C3%A1tilov%C3%A1_Barbora

Díky, --Svajcr (talk) 15:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Svajcr and Martin Urbanec: Dobrý den, kolego, nějak nerozumím, s čím bych mohl pomoct – nejsem na Commons správce, ani na Wikipedii člen OTRS týmu. Již řeší Martin Urbanec. –Gumruch (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Svajcr and Martin Urbanec: Dobrý den, kolegové, bohužel dnes uživatelka pokračuje v uploadování souborů před uzavřením DoSu (a není jasné, zda již byly zaslána povolení a pro které soubory, tedy zda i pro nové). Zkusil jsem jí ještě napsat, protože myslím, že zcela nechápe smysl Commons, tak jsem zvědavý, zda to k něčemu bude. –Gumruch (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Uživatelka poslala svolení s publikováním pod svobodnou licencí na vybrané soubory na Informační tým Wikipedie <permissions-cs@wikimedia.org>. Ostatní prosím rovnou smazat. --Svajcr (talk) 17:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gumruch Ahoj, paní Navrátilová svolení skutečně posílala, nicméně je to poněkud komplikovanější případ, který trvá déle vykomunikovat a vyhodnotit. Označil jsem za povolené díla od pana Záleského; Klöselova práce by měla být dořešena v nejbližší době (pravděpodobně do týdne), ještě čekám na doložení poslední formality. Nicméně, předpokládám, že vše skončí úspěšným orazítkováním souborů. Martin Urbanec (talk) 00:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DD2023/2024

[edit]

Ahoj, jen pro tvou informaci: celá série oficiálních portrétů herců Dejvického divadla je v jednání. Gampe (talk) 04:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Petr Pavel in 2020

[edit]

Ahoj, narazil jsem na prázdnou kategorii, kterou jsem navrhl ke smazání. Zjevně z ní byly smazány nějaké soubory. Kacir (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miloš Veselý (s kytarou).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bernard Bakala (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miloš Veselý (s kytarou).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bernard Bakala (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Otázka k autorským právům

[edit]

Dobrý den! Nedávno jsem poupravoval anglický článek o Michailovi Ščadovi (zde) a našel jsem jeho fotografii na ruské Wikipedii (zde). Jenže jsem nedokázal přidat tuto fotografii ke článku, tak jsem ji z ruské Wikipedie stáhl a pak nahrál na českou - naprosto chápu, že to takto není úplně správně, ale byl bych rád, kdyby tento článek fotografii měl. Přeci jen ten obrázek je někde na nějaké Wikipedii uložen. Nevěděl byste, jak to opravit? Tu mou fotografii klidně smažte...jen bych byl rád, kdyby nějak šla dát jak k anglickému článku, tak i k českému, který jsem včera překládal. Děkuji předem! - Friml Karel (talk) 01:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Friml Karel: Dobrý den, Wikipedie je svobodná encyklopedie a stejně tak Wikimedia Commons (kam je nutné nahrávat soubory pro českou Wikipedii) přijímá jen svobodný obsah, tj. buď dostatečně stará díla, kde autorská práva vypršela, nebo u žijících autorů taková díla, která jsou uvolněna pod svobodnou licencí, ideálně CC-BY-SA 4.0. Některé Wikipedie, včetně ruské a anglické, umožňují lokální nahrání ilustračních fotek (v malém rozměru) pod ustanovením fair use, ale na Commons a tedy i pro českou Wikipedii se použít nedají. U fotky na ruské Wikipedii je snad dostatečně jasně uvedený copyright. Takže musíte hledat jinde, buď s použitím Googlu nebo v jiných zdrojích fotku pod svobodnou licencí, jinak zůstane článek bez obrázku. Jde o to, že zveřejnění fotek zde neslouží jen k nějakému „ilustrování Wikipedie“, ale všechny soubory by měly být k dispozici (při dodržení licenčních podmínek a při respektování osobnostních práv) všem pro jakýkoliv účel, tj. třeba i pro komerční užití. Jinak by se kdokoliv, kdo by zdejší fotku neoprávněně použil (byť v dobré víře), vystavoval riziku popotahování ze strany držitele autorských práv (v extrémním případě žádaní náhrady za neoprávněné použití nebo právnímu postihu). Děkuji za pochopení. –Gumruch (talk) 08:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, no tak v tom případě škoda. Chápu vše k autorským právům, zkusím se podívat jinde. Děkuji moc! Friml Karel (talk) 11:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]