User talk:Richard Avery
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Reuse notification
[edit]Just seen: This image is reused at http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/851/460484/text/34/ (your authorship and GFDL named, local GFDL missing). --Martina Nolte (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Salisbury Cathedral St Aldhelm.jpg was uncategorized on 13 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Salisbury Cathedral George Herbert.jpg was uncategorized on 13 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Salisbury Cathedral St Andrew.jpg was uncategorized on 13 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Tubular.jpg was uncategorized on 24 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Soda Bread.JPG was uncategorized on 12 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Flower shapes
[edit]Hi Richard, I suggest to put theses drawings into Category:Flower diagrams. -- Ies (talk) 15:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Autopatrol given
[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 06:26, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Well, thank you. Appreciated. Richard Avery (talk) 06:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Herzlichen Dank
[edit]hierfür. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 11:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Good day, I accidentally broke the notes in this picture, when download the new version without watermark. And it is impossible to recover and see how it was - too. Do you can pull them back from history file, please.--Хомелка (talk) 18:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]File tagging File:Cecil Herbert Edward Chubb.JPG
[edit]
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cecil Herbert Edward Chubb.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cecil Herbert Edward Chubb.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
January (talk) 21:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Richard Avery⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Richard Avery,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Alcalá de Henares
[edit]Dear Richard, the city is Alcalá de Henares, libreros street or mayor street, near cervantes square. --ÁWá (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Box Genesis 1.PNG and Box Genesis2.PNG deletion
[edit]I want to delete these and other files, but I don't know how to. Please, instruct me on how to do it, then I'll do it myself... Thank you.Clausgroi (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- As I understand it only administrators can delete files and then only after the intended deletion has been notified beforehand to allow discussion (yes, democracy takes time!). As you have noticed I have nominated it for deletion and that's all that can be done for the time being until an admin gets around to checking any discussion and deleting it if he/she thinks that is the right thing to do. What you might like to do is visit the nomination page, there is a blue link in the nomination box, and leave any comments you want to make about why it should be deleted. You might like to have a look at this when you have time; Commons:Deletion policy. I hope that helps. best to you. Richard Avery (talk) 09:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Attribution for image
[edit]Dear Sir,
I would like to use your image of crane flies, available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATipula_maxima_mating.jpg, in an extension-outreach publication related to pests in community environments. This publication is purely for educational purposes and has no commercial interests whatsoever.
However, the suggested attribution format, "By Richard Avery (Own work) [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons", is very different from the style I will be following for other pictures in my publication, which will most likely be much shorter and in the format: "Photo by Abc Defghijk", or "Photo by Abc Defghijk, Lmnopqr.org".
Therefore for the sake of consistency, kindly let me know whether I may cite the images in the above formats, and if so, what name/affiliation should I use.
Thank you! Sincerely, Shaku
Shaku Nair, Ph.D. Assistant in Extension, Community IPM University of Arizona - Maricopa Ag. Center 37860 W. Smith-Enke Road Maricopa, AZ 85138-3010 Cell: (520) 840-9429 Office: (520) 374-6299
Bots
[edit]
You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.
What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.
This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.
If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!
- The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
- Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.
Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.
Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.
Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Deletion requests
[edit]Hi, Please read again the criteria for deletion. There is no reason to delete the pictures you nominated. Nothing personal, these are just pictures I copied from English Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
[edit]https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
What was that? --Leyo 22:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bisen-photo.jpg is still not OK. Could you please fix it? --Leyo 08:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- What turpitude have I executed that perturbs you so. I have identified the subject when it was not previously indentified. If you have a problem with this please explain to me why it is so irksome to your or how it trangresses the rules. A "what was that" with no explanation cuts no ice with me. This is way down the river and part of history in my world, if you are unhappy with it then revert it. During my modest work on Wikipedia I have never known someone mail me to ask me to revert some error or misinterpretation. I understand that the procedure is anyone is entitled to change whatever as long as they validate it with an appropriate reason. Feel free, go ahead, make my day. Regards, Richard Avery (talk) 13:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment on the photo. I took a photo of the label on the plant straight after photographing the plant, but I guess the label was wrong (I'm not an expert on plants, so the label is all I can base my IDs on). I've moved it to File:Plant at Tatton Park Flower Show 2010.jpg until the actual ID is figured out. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer
[edit]Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Richard Avery,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Multiple deletion requests
[edit]Hi Richard. When you propose more images for deletion with a common reason (not with a specific reason for every individual image), consider to use a common nomination page for all of them, with a list of affected files. For help, see Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. The discussion can be then better organized and not fragmented to many discussion pages. Thank you. --ŠJů (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Please read also criteria for deletion. --ŠJů (talk) 15:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Richard Avery,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Do not directly add Category:Images with watermarks
[edit]Hi! Please do not add Category:Images with watermarks directly to a file like special:diff/359541341. Use {{Watermark}}. Thanks!--Roy17 (talk) 10:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
OK, thanks for that. Apologies for the odd 10,000 I've done already. Richard Avery (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Watermark Free Image
[edit]Thanks a lot Richard for your comment. It means a lot for me & of course I would remove and re upload the files. But it would be nice if you tell which photos should I reupload without the water mark or all the photos. If you wish you can visit my photography page here - My photography page. I would love your help
Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mushfiqur Rahman Abir (talk • contribs) 16:29, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Coca leaves in a local store
[edit]Hi Richard, I took the picture in a popular neighborhood in La Paz city, is a little store that spend some edibles and little bags ogf coca leaves, the use of this is very popular in the traditional parctice called Acullico. Caleidoscopic (talk) 01:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Puzzling image
[edit]Hi Rich,
This is a tide pool by the Oslofjord (I've added the coordinates to the file). The bubbles I believe you're referring to are on the bottom, not the surface, there's nothing over the surface of the water. I don't remember exactly how deep it was, but it was probably around 3-5cm. What you've annotated were the main subjects of the photo. These two photos are from the same spot in the same pool if that's any help: File:Mosquito (Culicidae) Larvae - Oslo, Norway 2020-08-12.jpg, File:Unidentified - Oslo, Norway 2020-08-12 (03).jpg
_Larvae_-_Oslo,_Norway_2020-08-12.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Thanks! Ryan Hodnett (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]Thank you for your imagery of All Saints Church, Harewood. I've waited for so long for pictures of the funerary memorials there, and you finally provided them. THANK YOU! Best wishes, Cyan22 (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- My pleasure. Richard Avery (talk) 09:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for all your recent high quality images of Salisbury and the local churches. Great work. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. Richard Avery (talk) 17:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--19h00s (talk) 14:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Logo of the British Columbia Historical Federation (with no parent categories) seems awfully specific for one file. Do you mind if I get rid of that and instead create a Category:British Columbia Historical Federation, corresponding to British Columbia Historical Federation (Q4969710)? - Jmabel ! talk 00:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sure thing. You are right. That really wasn't my best moment. Thanks for the suggestion. Richard Avery (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
I created a Wikidata entry for one of your plaques
[edit]You can do it too, See: wikidata:Q125194140. RAN (talk) 04:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll consider that in due course. Richard Avery (talk) 07:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Richard Avery (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 | Category:Truing stand is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Omphalographer (talk) 03:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Truing stand has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jmabel ! talk 09:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Edmonds-Kingston Ferry has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |