User talk:PMG/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
 | File:USS Arizona (BB-39) - 1924.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 01:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:Uss california bb.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 23:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) transferring.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 07:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) Dressed with flags.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 07:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) Fourth of July.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 07:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) speed trials.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 07:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) commissioning.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 08:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) 1920.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 08:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) Crewmen.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 08:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:Uss georgia bb-15.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 09:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:Uss idaho bb.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 11:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana bow view.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 10:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana forecastle.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 10:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana in summer 1898.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 10:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana in drydock.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 11:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana guns.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 11:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:South Dakota class battleships;Wp1002.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 20:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:South Dakota class battleships;Wp0975.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 21:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Arizona (BB-39) - 1920.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 21:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:South Dakota class battleship;H44895.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 23:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:South Dakota class battleships;H81481.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 00:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:South Dakota class battleships;H81482.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 00:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:Uss iowa bb-4.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 15:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Category:Pundit has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sturm (talk) 02:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Sailfishandtaney.jpg
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sailfishandtaney.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Sailfishandtaney.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
|
File:Sailfishandtaney.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Basvb (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:A-2 torpedo loading.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Sargo1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Seadragon-ii.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Sealion(SS-195).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Aka67.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
| File:USS B-3, underway near the New York Navy Yard, 1909.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
- Reventtalk 01:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
| File:USS Sloat (DD-316).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
- Reventtalk 05:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
| File:USSCachalotSS170.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
- Reventtalk 08:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
| File:USS Farragut DD-348.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
- Reventtalk 09:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
| File:USS Skipjack SS-184.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
- Reventtalk 08:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
| File:USS Ellet (DD-398).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
- Reventtalk 15:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:USS Ellet (DD-398).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Reventtalk 02:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
| File:USS Grampus (SS-207).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
- Reventtalk 06:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:SNN-758 Patch-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ark Royal (1914).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:SS-230 Finback.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:SS128 S23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ss193.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ss202.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:SS202c.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ssn 671a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ssn682 patch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ssn683launch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 16:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ssn683long.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ssn713 embtb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ussdiablo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Texan schooner Independence.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SJMHLibrary (talk) 16:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Texas Schooner Invincible.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SJMHLibrary (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:USS Parsons (DD-949).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cobatfor (talk) 08:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:TCG Preveze;0836308.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:BattleshipArizonaMemorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 09:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:USS Strong (DD-758) in the 1950s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Linienschiff-Wörth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 13:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:USS Tunny (SSN-682).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 08:41, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
|
|
Panzerkampfwagen VI has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 22:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Vijay Singh has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
|
|
HMAS Australia (D84) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
2001:44B8:1127:6F00:B18F:3C0D:5973:64A9 23:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Structured Data: please have a look before editing
Hi, you added in all the files in Category:Summerjam 2013 containing "Tarrus Riley" that Tarus Riley is a motif on these images. Example: Special:Diff/461649805/595113431. But that's not true:
-
THIS is Tarrus Riley -
THIS is NOT Tarrus Riley
_-_1924.jpg){kind=link}
_transferring.jpg){kind=link}
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg){kind=link}
_Fourth_of_July.jpg){kind=link}
_speed_trials.jpg){kind=link}
_commissioning.jpg){kind=link}
_1920.jpg){kind=link}
_Crewmen.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1920.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_1950s.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1924.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1924.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_-_NH_86101.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1924.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NH_61483.jpg){kind=link}
_transferring.jpg){kind=link}
_transferring.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_transferring.jpg){kind=link}
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg){kind=link}
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg){kind=link}
_Fourth_of_July.jpg){kind=link}
_Fourth_of_July.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_Fourth_of_July.jpg){kind=link}
_speed_trials.jpg){kind=link}
_speed_trials.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_speed_trials.jpg){kind=link}
_commissioning.jpg){kind=link}
_commissioning.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_commissioning.jpg){kind=link}
_1920.jpg){kind=link}
_1920.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_1920.jpg){kind=link}
_Crewmen.jpg){kind=link}
_Crewmen.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_Crewmen.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NH_52644.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NH_52653.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NH_61210.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NH_91935.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NH_93856.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1920.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1920.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_-_NH_57651.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1920.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NH_44895.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_19-N-14753.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_19-N-20352.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_-_19-N-23818.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_1950s.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_the_1950s.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_1950s.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Of course, it was the artist's performance at the festival, but he had his band with him and I photographed all the musicians individually. So it would be bad if these motifs were all attributed to Tarruy Riley. Can I ask you to undo that and be more careful next time? Thank you very much and best regards, --Emha (talk) 09:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello. Sorry for my mistake. I went to category and reverted my changes. I will try to be more carefull next time. PMG. PS. What you wanted to do in your signature? Because for me its not working and I can see
Thank you very much and best regards, --Emha ([[User talk:Emha|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
PMG (talk) 18:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)- Its something on my side - now all signatures are broken, even my own. PMG (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Parachute - nope
It's drogue parachute (Q591399) --Markscheider (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Markscheider: thank you for info. I changed my edits and made already change in tool. PMG (talk) 22:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Glider aircraft
Please add depict: Q180173, not Q7404919. --Hjart (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Hjart: thank you for info. I changed my edits and make pull request to change in tool. PMG (talk) 22:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Duck
I can't really see the benefit of adding the rather vague and general item Duck to the series of images starting with File:Family of Australian wood ducks (Chenonetta jubata) at Queens Gardens, Perth, November 2021 01.jpg when it already has the far more specific item Australian Wood Duck attached to it. What benefit do you see in it? Calistemon (talk) 03:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
_at_Queens_Gardens,_Perth,_November_2021_01.jpg){kind=link}
Depictor choices
Hello again! I don't know how Depictor works, but some of your (?) choices surprise me. Here, for example, Karl Dyall is much more famous than his sister. Why did you choose her? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @SergeWoodzing: . If you want to know how Depictor works you can go here and click "Start" or watch movie that describe how its working. About this specific image - I was doing series of "mark all categories that are in main >Category:Actresses from Sweden<". Depictor shows you one category after another from main category that you choosed. So thats why I marked Sharon. If I would go for >Category:Male actors from Sweden< then he probably would pop up. Structured data describes "this is everything that is on this image". So besides this two people I added for this specific image other stuff that can be marked as "its on this image". PMG (talk) 22:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! So with "this is everything that is on this image" a lot of things & people often get excluded? Is that a good idea? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Mass use of depictor
Hi, thanks for adding SDC using depictor! I'm a bit worried that you seem to be using it a lot (or at least, my watchlist is flooded). Would it be worth you using a 'flood' or bot account for this work? Particularly if you're doing it in a mostly automated fashion? Just a suggestion. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Europejski krótkowłosy
Hello. Are you sure that this is a European Shorthair? Then I would also like to adjust the categories. Best regards Lukas Beck (talk) 10:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
(p18) !
Dziękuję za Twoją pracę nad (P18), którą widzę na co dzień… Dobre wspomnienia z Francji --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
check your algorithm
Hi PMG, can you please check your algorithm for SDC. I stumbled across [1], which is only half of the truth. The church is also shown clearly in the image and should be reflected in the SDC, I think. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Marz-Kirche_5157.JPG&diff=prev&oldid=731245332&diffmode=source){kind=link}
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
קיבלת צל"ש!
|
כוכב החריצות |
| I see and appreciate your dedication to wikidata statement in archaeological files, thank you! פעמי-עליון (talk) 13:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC) |
significant event (P793) statements
You added many significant event (P793) statements to files. I think that is not the correct usage of this property. For what you want to do main subject (P921) should be the better one. GPSLeo (talk) 16:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Now you added significant event (P793) statements to File:Hanau attack memorial protest Hanau 2020-08-22 stage 97.jpg they are redundant with the depicts (P180) statement. GPSLeo (talk) 06:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo: - sorry but what are your expectation in this situation? This is a photo of a girl. This photo depicts girl. And its connected to protest. PMG (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- The people standing on the stage are the protest. This is not like a macro photo of the bark of a tree where you could say that the forest is definitely not visible. GPSLeo (talk) 10:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo: - sorry but what are your expectation in this situation? This is a photo of a girl. This photo depicts girl. And its connected to protest. PMG (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Nowogrodziec milestone
I've changed the town from "Naumburg am Queis" to "Nowogrodziec". The milestone is situated in the village Ullersdorf am Queis (Upper Lusatia and until 1815 Saxony). Later Ullersdorf became part of Prussian part of Upper Lusatia, and in the 1820er it was integrated to Lower Silesia (Prussia). In Poland Ullersdorf was named Ołdrzychów and became 1959 an urban quarter of Nowogrodziec; but it was never a part of the old town Naumburg am Queis. All the best, PaulT (talk) 12:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Pohřeb Jana Palacha
Hello, the image File:The House of the Suicide and the House of the Mother of the Suicide (1180).jpg does not show the burial of Jan Palach (the event), but the text of the poem of the same name by the American poet David Shapiro and its Czech translation by the translator Tomáš Míka (it is mentioned in the English description of the file). Therefore, I think that this your editing is not correct. Gampe (talk) 12:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&curid=46680234&diff=790816218&oldid=651664884){kind=link}
- Thank you for information. I reverted my edit. Connection is probably too lose to justify it. PMG (talk) 12:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
You added depicts (P180) Mirador de Cal Tet (Q98556974) to several photographs of birds, but those photographs don't depict Mirador de Cal Tet (Q98556974). They were just taken from Mirador de Cal Tet (Q98556974).
depicts (P180) Mirador de Cal Tet (Q98556974) should be removed from those files. Pere prlpz (talk) 10:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Removed
Done PMG (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Another completely wrong "depicts"
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Entrance_to_Deception_Pass_Bridge_work_area_during_repainting_01.jpg&action=history. I'll revert, but you might want to work out how you got confused here. - Jmabel ! talk 23:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, this was not intentional - sometimes Depictor refresh images incorrectly. I reported this issue to creator of tool. PMG (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-en.svg requires updating
Hi PMG,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-en.svg is out of date. Artsakh is being dissolved, Ukraine and Moldova have left Commonwealth of Independent States and CISFTA Could you update it? Thanks again. 81.101.7.190 21:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don`t know how to edit svg files. PMG (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
6204824620
MDRaja 2409:40E4:28:26BE:8000:0:0:0 12:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi! You added depicts (P180) Pont sobre Cal Jaumet (Q85307694) to some photographs of buildings, but only nº 087, 089 and 098 depict Pont sobre Cal Jaumet (Q85307694). The other ones (086, 088, 091, 092, 093 and 094) don't depict this "bridge" but only the house in which it's inserted. "Pont sobre Cal Jaumet" means "bridge over Cal Jaumet", Cal Jaumet being the name of this house, literally "the house of Jimmy".
depicts (P180) Mirador de Cal Tet (Q98556974) should be removed from those files. --Enric (talk) 00:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Enric. I was not being able to find all files that you mentioned. So I decided to fully revert my edits in Category:Cal Jaumet Pensa. If you think that my other edits should be reverted - please revert me.
- I assume that info about "Mirador de Cal Tet" is just some error (I solved this issue in topic above). PMG (talk) 12:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks! --Enric (talk) 11:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
"depicts London Buddhist Vihara" ... not really, no, it doesn't
Hi, you've added multiple claims (like depicts (P180): London Buddhist Vihara (Q13645027)) to several images of the Bedford Park Club, built in the 19th century, such as File:Sketch of The Club, Bedford Park, 1880.jpg.
This has the obvious problem that while the images will always be of the Bedford Park Club, they will only remain images related to (not "of") the Vihara as long as the Vihara chooses to stay in the old Bedford Park Club building. It'd certainly be better to have the "depicts" statements relate to the actual object, the building, not the current incumbent of the building. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. I agree with you and not agree with you :). Problem is that London Buddhist Vihara (Q13645027) combine both "London building" and "buddist temple". I was thinking that maybe I am able to split this two entieties, but also in en:London Buddhist Vihara both entieties are combined to one. So I am not sure if/when this split should happend (I have only experience with christian temples, and they usually stay as a temple as long as possible). I don`t know how to solve this issue without destroying connections between Commons, Wikidata and Wikipedias. As some solution I added alias in Wikidata. PMG (talk) 11:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Let's hope they never move! Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
"Depicts" means you can see it in the picture
Re: File:St Peters Street from West Gate Tower 1970.jpg. In this picture, the camera is on the top of the Westgate Tower, and the road called Westgate is behind the camera. Thus you cannot see Westgate Tower, and you cannot see the road called Westgate. Therefore the picture does not depict those things.
In front of the camera is St Peter's Street, and quite a lot of the centre of Canterbury, including Canterbury Cathedral. So you could say it depicts St Peter's Street, Canterbury - or Canterbury Cathedral - or Canterbury, or all three. I hope that helps. Storye book (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)