User talk:Joshbaumgartner

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2006-2016 archive, 2017-2018 archive, 2019-2020 archive, 2021-2022 archive, 2023 archive, 2024 archive

Template:Country category is adding some bad categories to Category:Punjab, India. I figure you are the most likely to be able to fix this. - Jmabel ! talk 20:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe only Category:Of North India is wrong. - Jmabel ! talk 20:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be an issue with the regional assignments, which is more the bailiwick of some other users. Looks maybe fixed now? I've been away for a bit, but Sbb1413 was working on them last I saw. Josh (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm (temporarily) removing the support of region categories from {{Country category}} and {{Topic by country}}, since region categories should be needed if and only if there are real pan-regional content. The Category:Of North India category should be empty now as I have removed North India as a region from {{Country label}}. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 02:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I assumed you were in process and it would be sorted. Thanks! Josh (talk) 03:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following categories which you created have been listed for discussion here:

Omphalographer (talk) 23:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Young people has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 08:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with "<people> with <color> eyes" categories

[edit]

Hi, Josh. Can you look at these categories? The category navigation template is putting some bad categories on them. An example is everything in the (undefined) category Category:With blue eyes -- that's one of the problem categories. Similar issues exist with these other eye colors:

I was tempted to just scrap the navigation template for these, but you've been able to fix similar issues in the past, so I thought I'd check with you first.

Oh, and in the process of looking for all the eye colors, I saw the also-undefined category Category:With pink hair, so maybe you could look at those, too? Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been on a bit of a hiatus, but I'll try and look at these. At first look, there are a number of changes made since last I looked at this topic, but in some cases simple deletion of the second {{Category navigation}} call is the right answer. Others maybe need to use a different format. I'll have to sort through, thanks for bringing this to attention. Josh (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you close it now? =)

[edit]

Hi!
I have spoken to you before about this discussion here, apparently, there are no more objections. Could you close it?
Thanks! Minerva97 (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am on a bit of a hiatus, but I closed the CfD so you can go ahead and do the deletions. Thanks for the ping. Josh (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
USS Nimitz (CVN-68) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 15:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]