User talk:Mutter Erde

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you! I will ask :) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.10.143.124 (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC) But ad I researched Wikipedia regarding copyright and problems with images it suggested to first of all ask the person who uploaded it to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.10.143.124 (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mutter Erde imo the description "De Musette" does not make sense. A portrait to do with one of those seems unlikely, She is not holding a Piccolo oboe, but a hand fan, My conclusion: it simply is the name of the girl depicted. What do you think? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 17:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje, I think you are right. Probably the first source of this file was sette-3993378-details.aspx Christie's (there as Musette, nothing else). So I will move the file. Happy New Year! Mutter Erde (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible you delete it?

[edit]

Hi - You have used a Image of me at the fuckforforest page that i really don’t want to be there. Is it possible you delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.10.143.124 (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't do that. But you may ask here Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. (But first you must tell them which file you mean). Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks I will - But I researched Wikipedia on how to deal with copyright and issues with images and there it was mentioned to first ask the person publishing it to remove it. Shall I anyway write the administrators or do you want to research? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.10.143.124 (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever added the photo to a Wikipedia article can remove it. You can too. Whoever uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons (here) cannot delete it. Only administrators here can do that. Images from Wikimedia Commons are available for use in Wikipedia articles. They are two different projects. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

imo the translation is not correct, it should read mit den besten Grüßen, or am I that mistaken? Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 14:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje.. I read: Seiner Kaiserlichen Majestät (?) Resa Schah Pahlevi, Schah in Schah von Iran (?), mit den besten Wünschen.. I would change the file name as Signed photograph of Adolf Hitler with his best wishes for? to? Reza Shah Pahlavi. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 14:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mutter Erde, I think File:Signed photograph of Adolf Hitler with his best wishes to Reza Shah Pahlavi.jpg without leaving a redirect, cause the uploader is blocked. Lotje (talk) 15:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mutter Erde, ist da ein Typo bei der Description? Soll das nicht Satyrische Zeitbilder, Nr. 17, 1848. “Der berüchtigte Waffenstillstand vom Jahre 1848” sein? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 13:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje, du hast recht, das ist ein Schreibfehler. Wenn du noch mehr davon suchst: Das virtuelle kupferstichkabinett.de besitzt insgesamt 10 Nummern der Reihe. http://www.virtuelles-kupferstichkabinett.de/de/search/ >> Satyrische Zeitbilder. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Screenwriters from Vietnam has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Gunofficial1998 (talk) 11:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mutter Erde, könnte die Person links ein Kirchentreiber sein der versucht den ‚gemeinen Pofel‘ daran zu hindern, seine Fastnachtsbegeisterung auszuleben? Thnks. :-) Lotje (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Person links" ??? Hi Lotje, es tut mir leid, aber ich habe deine Frage nicht verstanden  :-). Meintest Du Louella Parsons  ? Mutter Erde (talk) 07:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hanno Koffler

[edit]

Hi! Your photo (Link) doesn't show Hanno Koffler. He looks like this: Link --LiterallySimon (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know these pics. But US Embassy has named him in their article https://de.usembassy.gov/de/2018-berlinale-empfang/ And if you look some minutes at the photo above (it's the only one), you may recognize him Mutter Erde (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's definitely not him. It may be someone else with the same name but it's not that actor. The man in your photo has greenish-brown eyes, Koffler has blue eyes, the nose is too thin here, the jawline isn't him, neither are the earlobes. It isn't the actor. If the US Embassy say that this man is the actor Hanno Koffler, someone there made a mistake. It's not unheard of ... Please change the name of the picture or delete it. --LiterallySimon (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanno Koffler, Berlinale Reception February 2018 (crop).jpg. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 10:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nadezhda Sergeyevna Alliluyeva (1901–1932).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Generalkonsul Jim Herman und Peter Friedrich, 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eigentlich denke ich, dass du dich hier urheberrechtlich ein bisschen auskennst, bei den Massen die du hier bewegst. Aber manchmal habe ich so meine Verzweiflung. Das Buch von Nell Walden war so ein massenhafter Missgriff und es geistern, glaube ich, immer noch Reste herum.

Jetzt dieses Foto von 1906 mit unbekanntem Autor. Das Foto erfüllt nicht die Bedingungen von { {PD-old-assumed}}, die 120 Jahre sind erst 2026 oder 2027 herum. { {Bild-PD-alt-100}} in der de:WP würde gehen, aber soweit ich weiß, hast du da Hausverbot.

Also hier mal auf deiner Seite die Bitte, halte bitte die Regeln ein, das erspart den ohnehin überforderten Admins irgendwelche 8-rangigen DRs zu entscheiden. --Goesseln (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Willst Du damit sagen: Eigentlich bin ich empört, aber da sie es hier nicht löschen werden, halte ich mich mit einem Löschantrag zurück. In wp.de ist das Bild wohlgelitten, aber da ist der Uploader unerwünscht. Ich kann damit leben. Übrigens: Gelöscht wird nur mit guter Begründung. Das gilt hier und drüben.
PS: Ich habe übrigens PD-old-assumed noch nie benützt. Entweder etwas ist legal oder eben nicht. Da bin ich konservativ. Mutter Erde (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Après moi, le déluge. --Goesseln (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Otto Dix by Hugo Erfurth, c. 1933.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Creator died in 1948. Term of copyright expiration was 70 pma on URAA date (1996-1-1) in Germany. => US copyright protection lasts until 95 pd (given here as "c. 1933").

Ich hoffe, ich habe diese blöden URAA-Regeln richtig verstanden und gehe dir hier nicht umsonst auf den Wecker. In Deutschland ist das Bild inzwischen frei, aber für Commons muss es leider auch in den USA frei sein.

Wenn man das genau feststellen will, müsste man ein Erstveröffentlichungsdatum herausfinden. Wenn ich das richtig sehe, gehörte das Bild zum Nachlass des Porträtierten. Wäre der hier erwähnte Ausstellungskatalog von 1992 zum Beispiel die erste Veröffentlichung die man findet, dann wäre es in den USA bis 2087 (!) geschützt. ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 01:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe mir erlaubt, dein hässliches, irreführendes (und anonymes) Template unter dem Bild zu entsorgen. Stell einen Löschantrag oder lass es. Versäume aber nicht, zuvor Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hugo Erfurth zu lesen. Bis denne. PS: Vor dem Internet gab es Bücher, Zeitungen und Zeitschriften. Fotografen wie Hugo Erfurth lebten davon, ihnen ihre neuesten und besten Bilder anzubieten. Mutter Erde (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop engaging in vandalism and edit war on this file. These are all relevant and appropriate categories.--Sanya3 (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:A_dance_in_Little_Russia,_c._1913.jpg&action=history Now I understand how you did 200,000 edits. BTW: Ukraine was founded in 1917 Mutter Erde (talk) 07:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Vasilii Mikhailovich Blokhin, Major-General, (1895 – 1955) (NKVD).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

NeoLexx (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Georg Swarzenski 1906.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Die Tänzerin Kathleen Zammit. Foto von Ernst Sandau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 11:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Racquel Darrian has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Amanda Addams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 08:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wie du weisst hält sich meine Begeisterung über dein Tun und mehr noch über dein Auslassen sehr in Grenzen. Aber da du aus irgendeinem Grund noch in meiner Beo stehst, hier mal ein Hinweis zu Anny Eberth. Google und (wenn die Bibliotheken mal wieder zugänglicher sind) auch meine UB sagt mir, dass Anny Eberth 1911 von de:Oscar A. H. Schmitz angemacht wurde, oder umgekehrt. Schmitz war da 38 Jahre alt, also war Anny da 27 (oder so, reine TF). Also wurde sie 1883 geboren. Das reicht, wenn man eine Lebenserwartung von 70 Jahren hinzuaddiert, also 1953, nicht ganz für PD-old-70. Aber vielleicht machst du sie etwas älter, dann passt das schon...
  • Die kleine Nebensache, dass eine Inhaberin eines Fotogeschäfts nicht auch die Fotografin sein muss, mal außen vor, aber das betrifft bei Commons auch viele andere Fotografen. --Goesseln (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Warum meine Disk auf deiner Beobachtungsliste steht kann ich dir verraten: Weil hier die seltsamsten Löschanträge auflaufen.
Danke für deine Herleitung des Alters von Frau Eberth. Ich empfehle, derlei Theorien nicht außerhalb meiner Disk zu verbreiten. Aber hier geht das.
PS: Gerade gefunden. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 06:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Germany and Finland

[edit]

Hello! You created the category Category:Relations of Germany and Finland, but to me it looks to be a duplicate of Category:Relations of Finland and Germany, right? I'm not sure what to do with the category you created, should it be redirected or maybe put up for deletion? -kyykaarme (talk) 19:34, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for this hint. I have created a redirect. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty in 'Bonnie and Clyde', 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 18:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Hitchcock and Jane Wyman arrive in New York Harbor.jpg

[edit]
You deleted the image description. Please upload a new file with your version, when you think its necessary (for whom?). Btw: see X Mutter Erde (talk) 06:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Orry George Kelly, 1948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vahurzpu (talk) 02:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikolai Yezhov conferring with Stalin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franz Marc 030.jpg is not a meaningless or ambiguous name. It has had that name for 15 years. Please don't do file name "improvements" and just stick to the renaming policy. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matt Lashey, Thomas Haldenwang, and Richard Grenell, 4th of July 2019 in Berlin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gare109 (talk) 16:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gordon Lightfoot - Back Here on Earth.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shirley Temple by John Miehle - Photoplay August 1949.jpg

[edit]

File:Shirley Temple by John Miehle - Photoplay August 1949.jpg has a very visible name and address of the magazine subscriber. Perhaps you could find a way to erase it. Seems like a violation of privacy laws to me. Maile66 (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Mutter Erde (talk) 17:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Shah Reza with Shahbanu Soraya, 1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanooz 03:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anton Schöner, Originalphotographie, signiert.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Mutter Erde, einfach nur "eigenartig" oder schlicht W-Commons-Stil, ein von mir bearbeitetes und unter De:WP als de:Datei:Anton-Schoener-1866-1930.jpg ‎hochgeladenes Foto nun nur mit deinem Namen und leicht veränderter Kennzeichnung hier hochzuladen; dito File:Anton Schöner - Bildnis des Komponisten Wilhelm Tappert, 1896.jpg vormals de:Datei:Anton Schoener Portrait Wilhelm-Tappert-1896.jpg? --HerrZog (talk) 23:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hab mir mal erlaubt, ein paar wikis aus dem Zeichensalat herauszuheben.
So sieht man gleich: Erste Beschwerde nachvollziehbar, die zweite Beschwerde ("dito") ist nicht zutreffend, es sei denn, man steht auf dem Standpunkt, deutsche Künstler sollten nur in der deutschen Wikipedia abgebildet sein.
Wieso lädst du eigentlich Bilder, die auch außerhalb von wp.de interessant sein könnten, nicht weltweit hoch? Anyway: Schreib doch was zum ersten Bild dazu, z.B.: Flecken und Risse auf der zvab-Vorlage von User:Herrzog behutsam korrigiert. Oder so ähnlich. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, danke für die Einführung in deine Sicht darauf, die Antwort passt zu deinem bisherigen Vorgehen.
Beide(!) genannten Bilder habe ich u.a. deshalb in der wp.de hochgeladen, weil ich erst gern durch kompetentere Leute als mich die Urheberrechtsfrage geklärt haben wollte.
Und ganz davon abgesehen: Deine ganze Argumentation ist keine, die deine von dir in keiner Weise kommentierte "Anmaßung" fremder Bearbeitungen rechtfertigt und wonach ich mir nun derartige Vorschläge wie nach "Anyway" unterbreiten lassen muss! NB!: Nicht dein Hochladen in Commons ist für mich problematisch - als dir offenbar bislang unbekanntes Gegenbeispiel mache ich dich mal auf File:Anton-Schoener - Selbstbildnis-1903.jpg aufmerksam, die User:Emha ohne diese "Anmaßung" hochgeladen hat.
Ansonsten ging es mir nur darum, dir zu aufzuzeigen, dass dein Verhalten nicht unbemerkt geblieben ist ... Gruß --HerrZog (talk) 22:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Lektion verstanden. User:Emha könnte auch dein obiges Problem lösen. Ich kenne mich leider nicht mit dem FileImporter aus. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2021!

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays 2021, Mutter Erde! *  
  • Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar!
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr!

   -- Lotje Lotje (talk) 16:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]

[edit]

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2021 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Mmm good

[edit]

It is with considerable satisfaction that I can report that your edit is busted. I mean the bust has found its artist. Have a good year! --VanBuren (talk) 20:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good News, Thank you very much. This was a complicated case. There is even a special article about this monument in wp:nl - so far without the name of the artist! (As of February 2020). Congratulations and a Happy New Year. Mutter Erde (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
PS: All wikimedians are invited, to put new cases into this gallery Commons:Sculpture images without artist name, to search for the sculptors and, after a while, take out solved cases. Mutter Erde (talk) 07:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reminder, I corrected the NL article. --VanBuren (talk) 12:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sub question

[edit]

Ping Mutter Erde, what should be done with the deleted files in Commons:Sculpture images without artist name (Ukraine) which seem to be deleted? 1, 2? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje, nobody needs deleted files. Out with them. And all best for you in 2021. Mutter Erde (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mutter Erde, wäre es nicht besser gewesen, wenn du beim Hochladen (oder gegebenfalls beim Korrigieren von anderen hochgeladenen Dateien) gleich die richtige Beschreibung, d.h. Technik und Maße, den Creator und mehr Kategorien angeben würdest?
Übrigens der Titel eines Gemäldes sollte zur Unterscheidung von einer gewöhnlichen Beschreibung fett angegeben werden. Der Autor wird als Autor mit dem Creator-Template angegeben und sollte nicht in der Beschreibung wiederholt werden. Meine Anmerkung bezieht sich auch auf andere von dir bearbeitete Dateien. Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 08:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das sind doch alles deine privaten Theorien, wenn ich das richtig zusammenfasse. Andenfalls: Bitte Quelle nennen. Mutter Erde (talk) 08:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Meine Frage hast du nicht beantwortet, meinen freundlichen Hinweis tust du als private Theorien ab! Soll ich unter diesen Umständen den Aufwand weiter betreiben? Schau dich doch um und vergleiche auch die Vorlage Artwork. Gruß --Mewa767 (talk) 08:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dein sogenannter Aufwand macht anderen Leuten wie mir (also dem Hochlader) nur zusätzlichen Kontrollaufwand. Wie wärs mit neuen Bildern suchen? Mutter Erde (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Du tust so, als ob nur du Bilder hochlanden würdest. Aber ich tue es auch. Wenn ich aber so ein Stück liegengebliebener Arbeit antreffe, korrigiere ich es, und in dieser Zeit kann ich keine neuen Bilder hochladen. Also wer beim Hochladen vieles weglässt, der nimmt Zeit Anderen, die seinen Arbeit korrigieren bzw. ergänzen müssen, sonst würde man nur Unordnung antreffen. Ich habe im Moment mehrere hundert Bilder, die aufs Hochladen warten und mir geht es nicht darum, dass ich andere korrigieren will, sondern im Gegengenteil – dass ich es möglichst nicht machen muss. --Mewa767 (talk) 09:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bei all dem, was ich bei meinen Uploads von deinen Korrekturen mitbekomme, halte ich deine Arbeit für schlicht überflüssig. Schon irgendeine Quelle gefunden, die eine Nennung des Autors in der Beschreibung verbietet? Mutter Erde (talk) 09:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mutter Erde, leider muss ich bei dem o. g. Bild feststellen, dass Du einem Fehler der Kunstzeitschrift „Die Kunst für alle: Malerei, Plastik, Graphik, Architektur“ aufgesessen bist und sogar ein möglicherweise falsch bezeichnetes Bild den russischen Kollegen untergeschoben hast. Ob die erfreut über dieses Vorgehen sind, ist zumindest fraglich. Dass Du nun sogar „mein“ Bild umbenannt hast, wegen eines „offensichtlichen Fehlers“ hat dem dann die Krone aufgesetzt. Offensichtlich ist nämlich nur der Fehler der Zeitschrift, siehe dieses Bild hier! Im Ahorn-Raum des Alexanderpalastes gab es eine „Gemütliche Ecke“ mit Kaulbachs Portraits der Mädchen von der Gelegenheit in Darmstadt im Jahr 1903. Die Kaiserliche Familie wird ja wohl kaum zwei Bilder von Tatiana aufhängen und Maria komplett weglassen. So wie es jetzt ist, kann das auf keinem Fall bleiben! Gibt es ein Œuvre Kaulbachs, wo man die korrekten Bezeichnungen seiner Werke nachvollziehen könnte? Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Werkkatalog, Prestel Verlag 1980. Als Blickfang Hanna Ralph
Hi Ras, Du hast schon recht, irgendwas passt da nicht zusammen. Andererseits ist der Aufsatz über Kaulbach in 'Die Kunst für alle 1904' in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Künstler entstanden... das ist eine sehr gute Quelle, während ich für andere Behauptungen keine seriösen Quellen finde. Vermutlich gibts was auf russischen Seiten, aber da kann ich nicht mitreden/mitsuchen. Man müsste den Fall an einen russischen Muttersprachler übergeben, der gleichzeitig kurz und bündig klarstellen kann, dass das Mädchen Tatiana in Wahrheit ihre Schwester Maria darstellt. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Gerade habe ich das maßgebliche Werkverzeichnis gefunden. Es kostet (gebraucht (!)) zwischen 110 und 140 Euro. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 09:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67: since the UP of Mutter Erde is on my watchlist, noticed your comment and went browsing through the Category:Friedrich August von Kaulbach coming accross Category:Works by Friedrich August von Kaulbach.
@Mutter Erde: the description reads Geklaut aus :... is that so? Lotje (talk) 06:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That was a little joke :-). Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Of course... Lotje (talk) 10:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Foto von Hugo Erfurth

[edit]

Hallo Mutter Erde, ich habe gesehen, dass du viele Fotos von Hugo Erfurth mit historischen Persönlichkeiten in Commons eingestellt hast. Ich überarbeite gerade mit seinen Erben den Wikipedia-Artikel zu Hugo Gugg. Erfurth hat ihn auch fotografiert. Wäre es dir möglich, auch ein Foto von Hugo Gugg in Commons hochzuladen? Es wäre für uns eine große Hilfe. Vielen Dank.--EFwiKlausX (talk) 12:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, leider kann ich aktuell kein Hugo Gugg-Foto von Hugo Erfurth anbieten. Aber ich werde darauf achten. Da Du mit den Erben zusammenarbeitest hätte ich einen Vorschlag: Sie mögen sich die Papierversion von http://hugogugg.de/sg_userfiles/IMG_0164-X,portrait.jpg genau ansehen, auch die Rückseite. Das sieht nach einem typischen Hugo Erfurth aus. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank. Es ist von Hugo Erfurth. Vielleicht gibt es noch ein schöneres. Aber man könnte damit erst mal beginnen. Herzlichst EFwiKlausX (talk) 10:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kent and Michelle Logsdon with Nikola Eterović, June 2017.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Mutter Erde, du hattest die Datei File:Kent and Michelle Logsdon with Nikola Eterović, June 2017.jpg umbenannt und dabei den Geistlichen als Nikola Eterović benannt. Das muss aber jemand anderes sein, vergleiche bitte mit Category:Nikola Eterović: Älter, grauhaarig, andere Gesichtszüge. Weißt du denn zufällig, welcher Geistlicher das ist? Sonst mache die Umbennung dorch gerne rückgängig, damit es nicht so verwirrend ist. Danke. Raymond 12:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Du hast recht, da habe ich mich verguckt. Leider kenne ich den Herrn nicht. Ich würde das Bild umbenennen in File:Kent and Michelle Logsdon with a guest, June 2017, wenn Dir nichts besseres einfällt. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keine Einwände, danke für die Korrektur. Raymond 16:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Mutter Erde, @Raymond: I added Category:Jeffrey M. Hovenier to the Category:Deputy chiefs of mission because his name is mentionned here. Hope that is okay? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 07:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lotje, thank you :-) Mutter Erde (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Matt Lashey, Laurence Bay Siow Hon, and Richard Grenell, 4th of July 2019 in Berlin (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 11:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

[edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urheberrechte

[edit]

@ File:Hans Adolf Bühler - Bildnis meiner Frau.jpg

Wieso gilt jetzt in Deutschland PD-old-60? Merkwürdig. --Goesseln (talk) 13:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:4. Grüne Woche Berlin, 1929 - Leon Amar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File:The Johnny Walker' of the Cinematograph World - The Gaumont Chrono.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Lower-resolution duplicate of file:"The Gaumont Chrono." 1912 ad, "Born 1890 and still going strong." - from, Cinema News and Property Gazette (1912) (IA cinenewgaz01cine) (page 544 crop).jpg)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Pigsonthewing.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Düzen Tekkal, Friede Springer, Mathias Döpfner, Kai Diekmann, and Julian Reichelt, June 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kutschkum (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

[edit]
Merry Christmas Mutter Erde

Hi Mutter Erde, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and healthy New Year,
Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,
Lotje (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Your Photos Are Best Subashshamis (talk) 09:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:1950 is the Cinderella year.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aesthetic Writer (talk) 12:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Mutter Erde: , with an alias like yours I suppose you know German pretty well. I’m Dutch and prefer to write in English. However, I know German, and as I was about to publish pictures from my first visit to Berlin I was astounded to find all sorts of references to a rather famous German. He is known all over the world as “the Great”. In German that would be, in my mind, “der Große”. However, there are many categories and articles (too many to mention all, both in Commons and the German Wikipedia) where “des Große” is mentioned. I was astounded. I tried to find a reason for this, in my mind obvious, misnomer. But I found none. So I came to the conclusion it was a mistake that, probably out of ignorance or laziness, was repeated time and again. I have recently managed to erase most traces of an ancient Neo-Assyrian king who never existed, but was brought into existence by some uploader to Wikimedia Commons. I had to write to specialists to know that I was right in thinking this king was an invention, then movers corrected the error. A major reason for my endeavour was, that future generations would keep using the wrong name, thus falsifying history. I think the same applies to Friedrichs des Großen. I found your alias in the history of the category that may, or may not, be at the start of this mistake. I am not a file-mover myself, and do not know enough about the system of redirects, but I feel strongly that repair is urgently necessary, probably involving creating correct categories, and articles, and redirecting from the incorrect ones to those. Maybe you, or people you know, could try and correct this historical (and ridiculously persistent) error. Dosseman (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Dear @Mutter Erde: , meine Güte, I find I must apologize. Only when I saw the "s" in "Friedrichs" did it dawn on me that maybe, in a curious twist of the German language, the name of the category was correct. I had along telephone conversation with a German girlfriend and her boyfriend whose family is half German. Both thought the naming was awkward, but after much pressure from my side agreed that the phrase is (probably, as far as they could fathom) correct. On a postcard from the collection of our own Amsterdam) Rijksmuseum I saw it was so in 1880, and probably is still correct. The German language keeps surprising me. I offer as a Wiedergutmachung this quote from Mark Twain I’ve always cherished since I read A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court: “Whenever the literary German dives into a sentence, that is the last you are going to see of him till he emerges on the other side of his Atlantic with his verb in his mouth.”Dosseman (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


IagoQnsi (talk) 03:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 22:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cilla Black and Paul McCartney - Step Inside Love, Bell Records 1968.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 02:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Saturday Evening Post August 9, 1930 - Guy Hoff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 02:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Das Magazin Nr. 42, Februar 1928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 01:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carl-Fredrik Reuterswärd - Non-Violence im Kanzlerpark, Berlin, August 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shisma (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hallo Mutter Erde,
ich habe heute einen antrag auf rückgängigmachung dieser löschung deines fotos beantragt (siehe link!). ich hoffe, es geht nun schnell durch. würde mich freuen, wenn du dort auch noch etwas dazu beitragen könntest, denn die vollkommen unzutreffende begründung ist ja nicht nur mehr als abenteuerlich, sondern fast schon hinterlistig.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Carl-Fredrik_Reutersw%C3%A4rd_-_Non-Violence_im_Kanzlerpark,_Berlin,_August_2017.jpg
frohe ostern und frieden auf mutter erden! Designkritik (talk) 14:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suzi Crandall

[edit]

Hello! Do you have any idea if actress and model Suzi Crandall is still alive today? I'm asking you since you got permission to publish her photos here, can you answer me please? Serkei1010 (talk) 14:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elitsa TODOROVA and Stoyan YANKOULOV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.9.27.69 17:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Nursing homes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 12:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 09:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

c:File:Conrad_von_Saldern_1904.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Mutter Erde, am 26. Nov. 2018 (also schon etwas länger her) hattest du ein Foto hochgeladen mit der Bezeichnung "Conrad von Saldern 1904". Leider bin ich erst jetzt auf dieses Foto gestoßen, da es sich bei dieser Person nicht um Conrad von Saldern handelt. Dieser Fehler wurde offensichtlich bereits bei der Quelle seinerzeit verursacht. Wer die abgebildete Person tatsächlich ist, kann nicht nachgewiesen werden, eine korrekte Abbildunbg von Conrad von Saldern ist allerdings zu finden in: "Biographisches Handbuch des deutschen Auswärtigen Dienstes 1871-1945", Bd. 4, S. 8. Darüber hinaus liegen mir noch weitere Fotos von Conrad von Saldern vor, auf denen eindeutig zu sehen ist, dass die Person auf dem hochgeladenen Foto nicht besagter Saldern ist. Könntest du bitte dieses Foto löschen? Danke für dein Verständnis und deine Hilfe. Gyosu (talk) 09:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conrad von Saldern 1904.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gyosu (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Weisgerber. Photographie von Erna M. Kollstede, 1914.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{User:Deletion Notification Bot/SDEL/headingless|1=File:Lisa Martinek - Mutter Erde fec.JPG|2=Privacy violation, request from relatives according to support Ticket:2023053010009571. Case has been checked by DE legal department: In accordance with the case law of the German Federal Court of Justice, the family members definitely have a right to have the image deleted. --User:Mussklprozz Mussklprozz ([[User talk:Mussklprozz talk

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mussklprozz.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa Martinek - Mutter Erde fec.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:PopeUnveiling1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 11:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ehrengrab

[edit]

Hallo ME, falls du mal wieder lust hast, ein Ehrengrab zu fotografieren. Inge Deutschkron hat auf dem Südwestfriedhof Stahnsdorf im Kapellenblock - Erbbegräbnis 91/1 ein Ehrengrab bekommen. Viele Grüße Z thomas 19:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AfD - Wahlplakat zur Europawahl 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hermann (von) Kaulbach 1888.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]