hello Mr. Mutter Erde, I am writing to ask you if by chance it could help me supporting some of my requests to restore files concerning a blocked user that has by name Глинистый сланец lately I tried to make some requests on Commons: Undeletion requests, but I can not find much support for the restoration, I noticed that recently you had changed a picture that was part of that 'blocked users, well I tell you that if you go to see the page of commons undeletion, you will notice a long list of files where few files have been restored, be aware that the may of files uploaded by this user are all portraits, photographs, and paintings of the era, the lience of which is only the license of the PD. I would like to submit to you some uploads of this user, so to realize what files they are dealing with since all have been deleted, and that I am trying to ask for the restoration.
currently I on the page of Commons: Undeletion requests I have three requests if they are not supported enough, if you want to make a jump I'll tell you immediately their number and the current title they have, so you will not be wrong to see them:
title 1 and list: (1.1 ile:King Victor Emmanuel III and Prince Amhà Selassié.png)
title 2 and list: (1.5 PD-100)
title 3 and list: (1.17 File:Inaugurazione della XXVI Legislatura.png)
Hi, I have seen that User:Yann distincts between a worthy upload and a less worthy uploader as here. So I would ask him to undelete your files (But please: Only files with a good source and a good description). Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 06:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
hi Mr. mutter I'm writing to ask you if you can convert a wikipedia file, in a file of commons, I'm asking you why I would have some files to convert to commons--Карой Гузман12 (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
Ja, danke für den Hinweis, da stimmt was nicht. Da Getty das Bild aber als die Lola Montez verkauft https://www.gettyimages.de/license/500637761 (immerhin 565 Euro) besteht Handlungsbedarf.Jemand sollte sich mal mit dem Lebenslauf der Nachahmerin beschäftigen und sie gegebenenfalls in einem eigenen Artikel vorstellen. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Conrad Kiesel - "A portrait of Lola Montez" (laut Christie's)
Conrad Kiesel - ungenanntes Modell (Spanish Lady)
Conrad Kiesel - ungenanntes Modell (Dame mit Rosen)
Stolzer Preis, den Getty Images da für ein gemeinfreies Bild verlangt. Und, stimmt, das Modell auf den 3 Gemälden von Herrn Kiesel sieht auch nicht nach Lola Montez aus. — Speravir– 22:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sehr schon aufbereitet und erklärt. Danke. Damit die Namensvetterin aber nicht verschwindet und damit die Geschäfte von Getty et al. befördert, hab ich ihr ein eigenes Bett aufbereitet Category:Lola Montés (actress). Verbesserungen immer willkommen. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 08:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi, I can't remove watermarks from Getty mages. But you can get a smaller version without Getty watermark if you know the title of a Getty image, for example: >Emanuele III with King Gustavo in Stockholm<. Put this phrase into the google mask, take the first getty entry and now you have to be quick. Click on this image in the gallery. Now you have one or two seconds to make a screenshot without watermark. If you are not quick enough, repeat the whole procedure. And don't forget to put your Getty file into the category Category:Media licensed by Getty Images. CAUTION: Most of the Getty Images are still under copyright. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 07:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Honor_killing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hello Mutter Erde, I have a question which I am very sure you will be able to answer: though the name of the dolmen in English is Spinsters' Rock, in German language, the article is about Spinster's Rock. Is that correct? Should the article be renamed as per the English spelling? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 07:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
heute wieder schöne fotos von dir vom alten jacobi. Hast du bessere als meine heute hochgeladenen von bolte und kiepert?
du magst es nicht glauben, aber ich hab tatsächlich scheußlichkeiten vorab aussortiert. Stell ruhig noch auf das andere foto oben nen LA. Ich kann das irgendwie nicht... Gruß--Zthomas20:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ist leider schwieriger als gedacht. Da zum Beispiel der folgende Admin nicht beurteilen kann oder mag, wieviele Blder es von folgenden Gräbern gibt, möchte er auch die Schrottbilder behalten. Da ich aber nicht einsehe meine Lebenszeit damit zu verbringen, die Schrottfotos auch noch zu kategorisieren um etwaige Dubletten (LOL) zu erkennen, müsstest Du selbst die Löschung beantragen (Bild aufmachen, Button unten links ("Löschung vorschlagen") klicken. Gründe: blurry, rubbish, low quality, personal wish of the uploader usw..
danke für das Foto von Max Gülstorff. ich hab es bisher nicht geschafft und wollte dich tatsächlich heute fragen, ob du es hochladen kannst. das ist ja gedankenübertragung! gruß --Zthomas09:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mutter Erde, I was wondering what to do with the spelling mistakes in the different images like this one (file name and text. It would be easy to have them corrected in one go. Let me know your thoughts. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
als Hinweis: „Es ist erreicht“ war de:Bartwichse für 2 Mark die Flasche (zum Preis siehe Abb.). Die Bartbind wird nur als 'Beifang' beworben. In sofern ist der Informationstext nicht ganz korrekt. Vielleicht magst du das Bild nun auch bei 'Bartwichse' einbinden. Und/oder bei de:François Haby. --Summer ... hier! (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SPIEGEL-Bestseller vom 15. September 2018.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. This will help you avoid leaving misleading summaries like you did here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me13:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi Lotje, in Germany they decided in 1907 to renew some spellings, for example to eliminate the "h" in Thier (today Tier) or in That (today Tat) . I guess together with the Austrian linguists. So, Preisrähtsel was then (before 1907) correct, but today it is a mistake. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:Ausstellungskatalog Arnold Topp & Nell Walden, April 1917.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Hi ME, sorry to bother you, but some of your uploads in Category:Herwarth Walden, ein Lebensbild, 1963 coming from [2] could probably be copyvios. Obviously, you adopted the license CC-BY-SA from en:Heidelberg University Library where the book was scanned [3] - but in this case the book‘s author died 1975 and some of the photographs and drawings are not old enough, too. I‘ve notified the librarians that they might have some illegal material in their published scans. Ongoing discussion is here [4] on dewiki (german language). (I’m aware that you have been blocked on dewiki and must not comment there, but at least you should know about it.) Greetings, —MBq (talk) 15:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Was soll daran ungewöhnlich sein (oder gar illegal) wenn die Erben von Herwarth und Nell Walden die Rechte an Nell Waldens Erinnerungsbuch an eine öffentliche Bibliothek abgeben? Mutter Erde (talk) 15:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Vielleicht haben sie das. Oder es ist ihnen egal. Aber die Rechte der Fotografen und Künstler, von denen die Abbildungen im Buch stammen, können sie nicht weitergeben. —MBq (talk) 21:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Just curious. Are both these images free from 1917? Nell Walden died in 1975 but in the second image, no photographer is stated. If its an anonymous photographer, it could be OK but I'm not a legal expert. If you think its not OK, please consider filing a DR on them both as the uploader. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Leoboudv, I have put a DR on the first file. For the second photo Nell and Herwarth Walden (1878-1941) have changed their seats. So we can keep the second file. The third file has to go, because Edmund Kesting died in 1970. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 07:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If these three 1914-1916 images are OK for Commons, please consider changing the license. The author is unknown. I think it is OK but the license may be wrong. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi Thomas, leider nein, ich hab das offenbar auch übersehen (sollte es überhaupt noch da sein). Ich habe deshalb beschlossen, dies und andere Gräber heute nachmittag zu suchen. Grüße, ich werde berichten. Mutter Erde (talk) 11:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bittesehr, der bestellte Grabstein steht zur Abholung bereit. . Im Lauf des Tages kommen noch mehr Grabsteine in seine Friedhofskategorie. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 05:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ich bin begeistert. Vielen Dank. bekommst du eigentlich pings, die ich in de.wp sende? bin gespannt, ob du noch andere interessante gräber gefunden hast. Gruß --Zthomas08:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
du warst fleißig über die Jahre. hab die Bilder eingebaut (de.wp im artikel und in der friedhofsliste sowie wikidata). ich warte auf neues material :-) liebe grüße --Zthomas14:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Thomas, die gibt es beide nicht mehr. Aber das Gebühr-Grab konnte ich noch festhalten, den Sievers habe ich auch verpasst. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Herrlich! ich hab es gleich eingebaut.
ich komm am besten kleckerweise mit meinen "Problemfällen": de:Willy Jaeckel auf dem Wilmersdorfer Waldfriedhof Stahnsdorf. Er ist vermutlich in einer Kriegsgräberanlage bestattet. Ich habe sein grab nicht gefunden. Es war aber Winter und alle Grabsteine waren zugeschneit, ich konnte nicht alle freiwischen. Eine Ehrendenkmalplakette habe ich nicht entdeckt. Grablage soll L III-10-236 sein. hast du ein Foto des Grabes? Gruß --Zthomas08:20, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Thomas, ich hab den Jaeckel im Sommer 2018 auch nochmal gesucht, hab aber nur ein leeres Betonbett gefunden. Entweder geklaut oder herausgenommen in Vorbereitung für ein Ehrengrab. Ich weiß es (noch) nicht. Oben hab ich auch noch ein Werk von Dir eingefügt, aber ich verrate nicht welches :-) Mutter Erde (talk) 07:35, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Guten Morgen Mutter Erde, Herrlich! ich hab es gleich eingebaut. Das Bild ist mir vor ein paar Tagen über die Beobachtungsliste gehüpft als du es verschoben hast. die restlich en bilder hab ich natürlich auch eingebaut
Hoffen wir mal bei Jaeckel auf die Ehrengrabvorbereitung
äh... ich war schon wie ein kleines kind zu weihnachten und hab schon geschnüffelt und drei bilder gefunden und eingebaut. 2 ehemalige ehrengräber (davon eins nicht mehr erhalten) und 1 sohn. vielen Dank schon mal :-) ich bin gespannt, was du noch findest. viele grüße --Zthomas12:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Na, wenn das so ist, dann Fröhliche Weihnachten! :-). Aber Eugen Richter liegt schon sehr lange in Hagen, und Margraff und Pniower hab ich auch verpasst. Die Wiegands könnte ich noch liefern, aber nicht mehr heute. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
vielen Dank! es war ja noch ein geschenk dabei. dann freue ich mich schon auf die nachweihnachtlichen geschenke unter anderem die Wiegands :-) viele grüße --Zthomas06:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, aber jetzt kommen die Wiegands. Bitte finde auch ein Plätzchen für Marie. Entweder an seiner Seite oder bei einem Artikel über die Siemens-Familie. Der Maler Max Koner sollte auch erwähnt werden. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 06:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
so... das grabfoto ist der ehrengrabliste und im artikel zu wiegand eingebaut. das bild von marie ist im wiegandartikel eingebaut. marie im konerartikel erwähnt. und koner im wiegandartikel erwähnt.
Das Grab von Hans Herrmann musste ich erst freilegen, aber hinter dem Dickicht aus 2 Büschen und 2 Tannenbäumen (fast 3 Meter hoch) sah es gut aus. Bei Rubner muss ich passen. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
oh krass. du bist gestern noch losgezogen um es zu suchen und hast dich durch das Dickicht gekämpft! vielen Dank dafür.
vielen Dank für deine zahlreichen Grabfotos! falls du noch weitere Fotos für Artikel hast, sag bescheid. Ich kann sie einbauen, wenn du möchtest. Viele Grüße --Zthomas14:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
hmpf, das hab ich übersehen, entschuldige bitte. Aber du hast wohl selbst eingebaut. Danke für das Foto. Gruß --Zthomas08:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
und was hat dieses Bild mit Feininger zu tun (das Bild ist nicht = die Publikation mit einhundert Seiten)? Von ihm ist es nicht, und dass er irgendwo in der Publikation vorkommt, kann ja sein.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
von deiner Heidelberg-Aktion mit dem Buch über Walden sind immer noch etliche Bilder hier als CC ausgezeichnet. Kannst du als Verursacher der Misere selbst aufräumen ? Oder sollen die Bilder von anderen stückchenweise mit einem DR versehen werden? Heute kam ich zufällig auf File:Adolf Loos 1913.png. --Goesseln (talk) 18:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, ich habe deinen Namen ergänzt (Ehre wem Ehre gebührt). Außerdem habe ich die Category:Sven Fiebig angelegt. Hier könntest Du zum Beispiel Grabfiguren aus deiner Hand unterbringen. Zum Hochladen von Bildern müßtest Du dir aber einen Nick (User-Namen) ausdenken. Grüße aus Steglitz Mutter Erde (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Dear Mutter Erde, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? . Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 08:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
du hast da PD-old-60 eingetragen. Bring mich doch bitte mal auf den Stand, warum jetzt PD-old (=PD-old-70) nicht mehr gelten soll. --Goesseln (talk) 23:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
mmh, das dürfte einer der Wikimedia-Programmierer gewesen sein. Aber in gut 30 Stunden wird sich die Zahl wie durch Zauberhand verändern. Guten Rutsch Mutter Erde (talk) 09:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Conrad Kiesel - "A portrait of Lola Montez" (laut Christie's)
Conrad Kiesel - ungenanntes Modell (Spanish Lady)
Conrad Kiesel - ungenanntes Modell (Dame mit Rosen)
Lotje (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Done: All images marked now. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Otto Gebühr & Doris Krüger 2007
Willy Jaeckel 2007
Theodor Wiegand und Marie Wiegand
_-_Friedhof_Nikolassee_-_Mutter_Erde_fec.JPG)
,_1896.jpg)
)
.jpg){kind=link}
_de_Pietro_Aretino,_2.jpg){kind=link}
,_gezeichnet_von_Karl_Schmidt-Rottluff,_1911.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_de_Pietro_Aretino,_2.jpg){kind=link}
_de_Pietro_Aretino,_2.jpg){kind=link}
_de_Pietro_Aretino,_2.jpg){kind=link}
,_gezeichnet_von_Karl_Schmidt-Rottluff,_1911.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_gezeichnet_von_Karl_Schmidt-Rottluff,_1911.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Little_man_in_the_tree_(5278200034).jpg)
