User talk:Lucas
Hi! I'm Lucas, sysop on italian wiki: here's my italian page. If you like to contact me, please leave a line on italian wiki too. Thanks. ;) --Lucas 06:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 19:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Antonio Di Natale.jpg was uncategorized on 19 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Jacque Fresco.jpg was uncategorized on 21 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Logo
[edit]Si', questo sicuramente si' (ecco qua: File:Ryanair logo.svg). Ciao--Trixt (talk) 10:32, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Copyright
[edit]Ti ringrazio per avermelo ricordato!
Su commons sono ancora alle prime armi e ancora faccio molta confusione su quale template utilizzare.
Mi potresti gentilmente ricapitolare quali voci devo correggere e consigliare quali template utilizzare? --Marce79 (talk) 07:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Penso di aver capito dove ho sbagliato: devo aggiungere la fonte invece di utilizzare il template own. No? --Marce79 (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Conversioni
[edit]La versione di prova di Corel Draw X5. Però non é il programma a fare conversioni buone, sono io che ho trovato i loghi nei PDF, poi ottimizzati a mano (perché alcuni oggetti non erano agganciati ai nodi, ecc...). --Marce79 (msg) 06:29, 6 feb 2012 (CET)
Not a duplicate
[edit]The 1st photo is not a duplicate. It can't be, the 2nd one is a crop of the 1st. So the 1st needs to stay here on Wikimedia Commons to show the chain of edits. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 21:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for you message Cirt. I saw many other images deleted after the "cleaning-process". It is like when we cut away a water mark and then we delete the first photo, I think, don't you? --Lucas 21:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- No. I strongly disagree. We should keep both. -- Cirt (talk) 21:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- sorry, is there any policy on that or it is just your opinion? id like to understand your position. thanks. --Lucas (msg) 21:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Commons:Avoid overwriting existing files. -- Cirt (talk) 21:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes, i know that policy. But this case it seems pretty different to me: the user cutted just registred trademarks (tv logo) and some texts. --Lucas (msg) 21:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, and both files are useful, valuable, educational, and encyclopedic. -- Cirt (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for you useful opinion ;) --Lucas (msg) 21:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, and both files are useful, valuable, educational, and encyclopedic. -- Cirt (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes, i know that policy. But this case it seems pretty different to me: the user cutted just registred trademarks (tv logo) and some texts. --Lucas (msg) 21:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Commons:Avoid overwriting existing files. -- Cirt (talk) 21:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- sorry, is there any policy on that or it is just your opinion? id like to understand your position. thanks. --Lucas (msg) 21:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- No. I strongly disagree. We should keep both. -- Cirt (talk) 21:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok, you're welcome. ;) Thanks to you very much for the polite and civil discussion! And thanks for not re-adding the "duplicate" tag, much appreciated. :) -- Cirt (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind words! ;) I am sysop on it.wiki and I just know how "dummy" would be to start an edit war (and for what, then?)... I think that talk is the better way to understand different ideas. Also: I just love the open minded environment here on commons. On it.wiki we are a bit "strict", therefore I only have to learn here ;). Have a good night. --Lucas (msg) 21:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- You too! I'm always very appreciative when we can conduct ourselves with professionalism and decorum, I also appreciate your kind words, very much! -- Cirt (talk) 21:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
La settimana enigmistica
[edit]Ho richiesto io quell'indicazione (Trixt l'ha solo migliorata). Ho provato a riparare l'svg ma non sono in grado. --Marce79 (talk) 11:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/833/immaginecgk.png/ e http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/543/immagine1io.png/ del bordo delle S--Marce79 (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Soldato bizantino di Alessandro Tonini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alexander VIII (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Vincenzo De Luca.jpg
[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vincenzo De Luca.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Trixt (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ciao. Scusami, avevo sistemato ma non tolto il tuo avviso. Tutto a posto ora, era una cosa segnalata al bar, c'erano state delle modifiche inopportune alla fonte del file. Elimina pure questa discussione: in Commons non e' obbligatorio ne' tenersele in talk ne' archiviarle, se la cancelli vuol dire che l'hai letta e che non ti interessa tenerla visualizzata. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Immagine di Papa Francesco
[edit]L'immagine è tratta dal mio schermo, ho effettuato uno screenshot durante la diretta da San Pietro. C'è qualche modo di ripristinarla od è stata eliminata?
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Lucas⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Lucas,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, This image is in the public domain (not enough creativity, which is required by French copyright law), and it is certainly not a candidate for speedy deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked soon
[edit]
Yann (talk) 15:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- I wish to add a little explaination here too. Please read what vandalism means here and here. If you don't agree with someone, there is no need to support your opinion by biting users or showing your sysop privileges, you may just talk or explain your point, at least once, before acting that way (we were talking about a single explained revert, done without even knowing that you were sysop), please read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. As you probably know, I have those same rights on Italian Wikipedia since 2006, and I know how to use them well. Thanks, and have a nice, enjoying, and productive wikipedian experience. --Lucas (msg) 12:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
I have nominated both of these for Standard Deletion because your Speedy nominations were incorrectly reverted by User:Yann. I see that Yann threatened to block you above...interesting. Geogene (talk) 21:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Lucas,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Template Presidenza della Repubblica
[edit]Ho notato che hai caricato dei file dal sito del Quirinle (http://www.quirinale.it). Ti volevo segnalare che da ora in poi useremo il seguente template dedicato per questo tipo di immagini
{{Presidenza della Repubblica}}
Non c'è bisogno che tu modifichi le licenze già inserite nei tuoi vecchi upload: l'operazione sarà effettuata da un bot. Un saluto e grazie! --Ruthven (msg) 09:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Correction
[edit]Hi. Point of fact regarding your statement "Jeff G. can block the user" in this edit: I am not an Administrator here, therefore I cannot block here. — Jeff G. ツ 15:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Yep, Jeff, It's my fault, I didn't check because I took it for granted considering your link to the admin dashboard. :) --Lucas (msg) 15:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- No problem, I've had such noticeboards on my watchlist for many years, since before my first RfA. — Jeff G. ツ 15:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Ciao Lucas,in merito alla mia richiesta di rimuovere alcune mie immagini presenti su Wikipedia,vorrei specificare meglio il motivo della mia richiesta. Purtroppo le immagini sono pubbliche,e poco gestibili in rete,tanto da non rispettare neppure il copyright dell'autore. Ne ho caricate altre con la mia firma,in modo da evitare che le mie opere vengano diffuse senza il mio consenso. Corryx (talk) 13:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC) |
Copyright status: File:Luca Marin.jpg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:Luca Marin.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Luca Marin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 17:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Jcb, that image is simply a derivate work from this one, I copied and pasted the template but the license's line got lost somewhere. :-) Did it, thanks! --Lucas (msg) 01:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 |
File:MauroIcardi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Gusama Romero </talk> 05:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Cagiva Logo 2000.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 12:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Old barnstar beard.png
[edit]
|
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Old barnstar beard.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Sourced to file since deleted as copyvio or missing Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:CostaSamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E4024 (talk) 00:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Goofy.png was recently deleted
[edit]
File:Goofy.png was recently deleted by MGA73 for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Copyright violation: Goofy is copyrighted by Disney
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:44, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yasu (talk) 15:05, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Jamie Lynn Spears.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
