User talk:Jon Kolbert/Archive 3

Happy New Year, Jon Kolbert!

Happy New Year!

Jon Kolbert, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

DR

Hi. Did you close "all" the DRs under Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli? --E4024 (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

@E4024: Whoops, thanks for spotting that. I did not see the previous request. I have gone and closed it. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Panoramio is closed

Hello! Panoramio is closed. What is the point in such edits? --Insider (talk) 07:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@Insider: , the closuer of Panoramio is irrelevant. Conversion to https provides better security on the internet. Artix Kreiger (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Belinda Stronach

Hi there! Responded to your alert via email regarding Written Permission for Copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesocialgroup (talk • contribs) 01:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Faith Hill on the Jumbotron (3972893368).jpg

If you revert saying it's DM, please add the {{De minimis}} template. I have altered the categories and description, if the rename is approved a DM claim could be considered reasonable. The way the page looked when the original DR was started a DM claim wasn't reasonable. Your revert actually just brings back doubts over copyright, meaning the rename will possibly be denied. And without rename it may not be considered DM, resulting in possible deletion. - Alexis Jazz 16:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: The title of the file has nothing to do with whether a not a copyrighted element of an image is de minimis or not. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:36, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Policy guideline: "X is referenced in the filename" - Alexis Jazz 16:38, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Did not know you are an administrator. (and can move files) Okay. Thanks! - Alexis Jazz 16:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) @Alexis Jazz: right, that's precisely why it's just a guideline. There are much higher quality photos of this person, and it's pretty clear that the sole purpose of this image is not to illustrate the artist. The title of a file may be an indication of what the file's really depicting not complying to de minimis guidelines, but is not in itself a violation. I've gone ahead and moved it to a better name. Cheers. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

One more note about this case. Storkk is not very happy you didn't leave a redirect when moving the file because this resulted in a redlink in a DR that didn't result in deletion. My personal opinion is also that when moving a file that has been here for over a year, it's probably best to leave a redirect. Even when not in use, there could be external websites linking to the file. This is just to notify you, if you prefer moving without leaving a redirect I won't argue with you about that. There are arguments for not leaving a redirect as well. Thanks for your help with that file. :-) - Alexis Jazz 14:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Taisekiji Hoanden.jpg

File:Taisekiji Hoanden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the blocking

Of 72.64.6.55 (a/k/a Bigshowandkane64 on Wikipedia). However, they are continuing to post on my talk page under different IPs. I put in a request for my talk page to be semi-protected earlier. Could that be done, please? I know he'll keep posting under different IPs until that happens. Thanks much and cheers! --Ebyabe (talk) 23:03, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Oh, and he's now calling me a dumbass for deleting his comments. He erased it, but it's still in my talk page history. --Ebyabe (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

@Ebyabe: Riley has protected your talk page, seems all good now. Let me know if anything else arises. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

KolbertBot

Hi Jon, did you already notice this? Not a big issue but just a bit inconvenient if one searches the SBL log... Best, --Achim (talk) 20:02, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

@Achim55: I did not know of that before, no. I have since removed most of the Amazon links from those affected files, but I also was unable to edit File:20020109_Yoo_Delahunty_Geneva_Convention_memo.pdf to change archive.org to HTTPS, because I was hitting the blacklist. Is there any way for admins to temporarily bypass the blacklist? Thanks, Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Worms Head/Worm's Head

I notice you recently renamed a bunch of pictures to change "Worms Head" to "Worm's Head" without leaving a redirect. I've reinstated the redirects for some (the ones from Geograph Britain and Ireland, such as File:Worms Head, Gower. - geograph.org.uk - 393351.jpg) because the old name wasn't bad enough to warrant breaking it. In any case, Ordnance Survey maps all show the name of the island as "Worms Head" without an apostrophe, so arguably the old names weren't incorrect at all. --bjh21 (talk) 11:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Any links to the files were updated and the majority of the files had no inbound links at all, so I didn't see much merit in keeping a redirect. In many different sources the region is referred to with the apostrophe. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not delete file redirects (or suppress their creation). There is zero benefit to deleting them in most cases, and there is potential harm. It doesn't matter if you fix inbound links from Wikimedia projects or not. The problem is incoming links from outside WMF projects, which may or may not exist and cannot be fixed. The main exception is when the redirect would be misleading.

With regards to the headland in Wales, both variants are widely used in sources. Clearly we can only use one, and we should be consistent on categories. Its not worth quibbling over it when it comes to filenames. IMO these moves do not meet file rename criteria 3 (its not "wrong name" to "right name", its "acceptable name" to "acceptable name"), so shouldn't have been done.--Nilfanion (talk) 19:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

lincense review

Hi Jon, Thanks for making me license reviewer. I tried the first few. Is this edit the correct way to proceed, in this case for an image present on Pixabay? Kind regards, Elly (talk) 23:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Ellywa: No problem :) - the review looks good to me! Don't hesitate to ask me or any other admin/license reviewer if you have any questions about any particular cases. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Sexy librarians?

User:Geo Swan thinks you need to explain something to him but hasn't bothered to ping you. Please see Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/11/Category:Sexy librarian meme. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

File Deletion proposed

Dear Jon

File by TeddyMStudio proposed for deletion

Thank you for flagging up the deletion request for one of my files. I regret I cannot easily decifer how or where to respond and understand why my file is proposed for deletion. Please could you advise?

Best swishes Teddy. Teddymstudio (talk) 07:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

@Teddymstudio: Hello Teddy, you may respond on this page by clicking on this link. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Jon. I have added a brief explanation via the link supplied. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teddymstudio (talk • contribs) 07:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Commons User

Could you lift the block on User:Commons User for the time being - they're currently unable to request a rename due to a really bad block on Portuguese Wikipedia by EVinente. If we can get EVinente to lift the block first, then we'll get the rename sorted out as quickly as possible by a renamer or steward. Nick (talk) 10:48, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Commons User: can't access m:Special:GlobalRenameRequest? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: no, please see m:Steward_requests/Username_changes#Commons_User --Alaa :)..! 11:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@علاء: Right, a classic Catch-22. Looks like User:The Salvator has already been unblocked. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Closure of AN discussion

Hi, please be aware that a prior discussion is required before starting in formal desysop request, see Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. Jcb (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: Thanks for the note, I have un-archived the discussion allowing for consensus to be reached. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:34, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

deletion of some photo's

hello Jon,

• (Removed Hedda-Eulenberg.png; deleted by Jon Kolbert because: per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eulenberg.)
• (Unterschied | Versionen) . . Herbert Eulenberg‎; 19:57 . . (-35)‎ . . ‎CommonsDelinker (Diskussion | Beiträge)‎ (Removed Portraet_Herbert_Eulenberg.jpg; deleted by Jon Kolbert because: per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eulenberg.)
• (Unterschied | Versionen) . . Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eulenberg‎; 19:45 . . (+334)‎ . . ‎Jon Kolbert (Diskussion | Beiträge)‎ (Deleted: per nomination, please use appropriate copyright tags to properly establish the copyright status of the images. These are not own work as claimed.)
• (Lösch-Logbuch); 19:45 . . Jon Kolbert (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Portraet Herbert Eulenberg.jpg ‎(per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eulenberg)
• (Lösch-Logbuch); 19:45 . . Jon Kolbert (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Hedda und Thomas Mann.jpg ‎(per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eulenberg)
• (Lösch-Logbuch); 19:45 . . Jon Kolbert (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Hedda1 320j.jpg ‎(per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eulenberg)
• (Lösch-Logbuch); 19:45 . . Jon Kolbert (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Hedda250.jpg ‎(per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eulenberg

There is a mistake on deletion of photo's filed in the list above. I am the only owner of all of the photo's concerning the poet-Family of Herbert and Hedda Eulenberg. I can prove that i am the owner by heritage.

There is a prove of someone else known as German photographer Grubenbecher, the Photo of Hedda Eulenberg was taken in Studio before

world-war I.

The photo concerned was taken by my father; the son of Hedda Eulenberg after the

2. World war

in Kaiserswerth on the terrasse of “Haus-Freiheit”(The Camera , he used at that Time was a Kodak Retina, it is not a studio-photo)

Eulenberg (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Eulenberg: and thank you for your message. At this point I would like to advise you to send a message to COM:OTRS, as they are set up to properly determine and verify copyright ownership/status in these instances. Please let me know if you have any questions and I would be happy to help. Thank you, Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sumitmpsd

Hi, File:Mahendra Mewati.jpg is not deleted. Is it an oversight, or was it reuploaded? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: Ah, I think the script might not have worked on that one, I have since deleted it as it was supposed to. Thanks for the note! Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Help with hanging delated photo

Hi,

I paid for my photo. This is link to file of my friend https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jacek_Sztuka_fot_Piotr_D%C5%82ubak.jpg

What's wrong? I'd like to use this photo 3 time.

Help me please Best Jacek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacek Z Sztuka (talk • contribs) 16:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jacek Z Sztuka: Hello, and thanks for your message. In order to keep the photo on Commons, we need further proof that the image is freely licensed. Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS to help provide us that proof. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

About File:Boutiqueafricaine marketplace large.jpg

Nothing wrong with this image that is relevant to its wiki page. Formal approval to use has been sent to OTRS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsk digital (talk • contribs) 02:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

File:TargetRats.jpg

File:TargetRats.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Question regarding File:Mamamoo in 180519 Holgabun Festival.jpg

Hello, apologies if you are not the proper person to be speaking to. I wanted to contact an Administrator with a question I have regarding File:Mamamoo in 180519 Holgabun Festival.jpg. The description seemed off to me, so I spoke to the original photographer on Twitter (as stated in the image description itself) and they informed me that while they gave permission to have the image used on Wikipedia, they were unaware this required them to release the photo under a Creative Commons license and would like it removed. I'm not sure if there's a way for me to me to give the conversation to an Administrator so the file may be removed in a timely manner.

Thanks, DanielleTH (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

@DanielleTH: Hello there and thanks for reaching out. I will try to help out the best I can. First off, what's the twitter handle of the photographer? Thanks. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:11, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jon Kolbert: Their handle is @lampas__. DanielleTH (talk) 15:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Can you link me the specific tweet permalink? (Click the time and date and copy the URL with /status/.) — regards, Revi 16:30, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

@-revi: Looks to be here. Posted on May 19th. DanielleTH (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

@DanielleTH: Thanks. I've added a no-permission tag, if the uploader does not provide proof of the file being under a free license within 7 days it will be deleted. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

File deletion request

I noticed you deleted File:IPhone Xr vector.jpg but left the deletion request open. I'm not familiar with Common's procedure. Can you please close the case accordingly? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:04, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

https

Hello, you made a series of edits that will may cause issues, example : [1], the links in the template are not any more available exemple: File:Poronidulus conchifer 248886.jpg Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: Ah, I see the issue. I will make the necessary modifications. Thanks for your message. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hello,

I kindly ask to undelete the following pictures, as the real author of them has sent proper agreement to OTRS (ticket:2018093010002945). There was deletion request on July: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Miszunger, but it seems that the author and uploaded of these files had simply not spotted the request. Out of the former deletion request the file File:Bronisława Kowalska 2001.jpg should not be undeleted as the authorship of this one is unclear.

• File:Z Aleksandrem Kwaśniewskim- gratulacje 1995 po wyborach prezydenckich.jpg
• File:Uniwersytet Wrocławski wręczenie dyplomów doktorskich 2015.jpg
• File:Legnica Dzień Dziecka 2000.jpg
• File:W ławach sejmowych 1997-2001.jpg

Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@Polimerek: Hi, I've undeleted the files and tagged them as OTRS pending as I don't speak the language. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much for taking care of my problem with that idiot and also can you also protect my user page for like a day. He vandalized it twice [[User:ARMcgrath|A.R.M.]] (talk) 17:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you protecting it I appreciate it [[User:ARMcgrath|A.R.M.]] (talk) 17:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@ARMcgrath: No problem. I've semi-protected your userpage indefinitely. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

I just hate how user like that go over board as say oh you started the edit war. I’m just happy I can relax now without an idiot reverting my user page and the copyright notices that he created [[User:ARMcgrath|A.R.M.]] (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Reverting Faebot

Why did you make this edit? The housekeeping task is likely to do exactly the same thing again. --Fæ (talk) 16:04, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

@Fæ: seems like a misclick in my watchlist, undone. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Closing a deletion request

Hi. Is it possible for you to close this deletion request? It's been open since June 2018, and since all of the images in that category have been restored, I think this image can be kept as well. Thanks. Keivan.f^Talk 01:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

@Keivan.f: Hi there, I generally don't handle undeletion requests, and I am not 100% certain on what should be the outcome here anyway. I'm going to leave this to someone who regularly deal with undeletion requests instead, for consistency's sake. Sorry I could not have been of more help. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

File:19-66-home.jpg

Please restore File:19-66-home.jpg, which was in use on d:Q17190186 when you deleted it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Do you think it's reasonable to wait for the deletion request to be closed on Wikidata first? Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

No. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:05, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Supreme Court of Canada sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:20, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Brain lobes.jpg

Hi Jon Kolbert!

Can you undelete the above file for a brief period so that I can import it to Wikiversity for fair use? Thank you in advance for your kind consideration! --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

@Marshallsumter:  Done, please ping me once it's imported. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

@Jon Kolbert: Transfer process complete! Thank you! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Uploading duplicates

Hi, I noticed, that you recently transfered a very lot, likely thousends of, of duplicate files from flickr. I you look at the list of dupes you'll see that the very most of them were uploaded by you. I currently allready proccessed number 9 till 100. Can you please try to reduce the number of dupes in future. Thx. --JuTa 18:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

I now proccessed the first 500 and only max. 10 were not created by you. --JuTa 11:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

@JuTa: Hello, unfortunately Flickr2Commons is not detecting when there are duplicates, and since the shutdown/mass-deletion of image on Flickr is imminent I thought it would be better to transfer the user's files over while they were still available. Jon Kolbert (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hmm, there are news that cc-by images will not get deleted. I see no real reason to get in a hurry by that reason. --JuTa 13:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jon Kolbert!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

For example, you haven't categorized File:Boats at Pulau Ubin (26402809353).jpg but I have categorized it.√Tæ√ 17:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Phaeothlypis fulvicauda (Arañero ribereño) (14336536553).jpg

File:Phaeothlypis fulvicauda (Arañero ribereño) (14336536553).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 22:57, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Phaeothlypis fulvicauda (Arañero ribereño) (14129763820).jpg

File:Phaeothlypis fulvicauda (Arañero ribereño) (14129763820).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 22:57, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Pensamiento (Viola sp.) (14618371860).jpg

File:Pensamiento (Viola sp.) (14618371860).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 07:11, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Pandion haliaetus en Rancho California (16211593027).jpg

File:Pandion haliaetus en Rancho California (16211593027).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Pionus chalcopterus (Cotorra maicera) (16371766276).jpg

File:Pionus chalcopterus (Cotorra maicera) (16371766276).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Pionus menstruus (Loro cabeciazul) (1) (14923843169).jpg

File:Pionus menstruus (Loro cabeciazul) (1) (14923843169).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Pionus menstruus (Loro cabeciazul) (3) (14923974077).jpg

File:Pionus menstruus (Loro cabeciazul) (3) (14923974077).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Písamo - Cámbulo (Erythrina poeppigiana) (14168879149).jpg

File:Písamo - Cámbulo (Erythrina poeppigiana) (14168879149).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)