User talk:Jeanhousen/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
Category:Populated_places_in_Austria-Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Wrong name of ship and IMO
- Hi, Jeanhousen, it is ΕΥΓΕΝΙΑ, IMO 5355890, Category:Evgenia (ship, 1944), in Port of Spetses, thanks--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Monemvasia
Bonjour Jeanhousen, j'étais à Monemvasia 4 jours après vous et je commence à classer les sous-catégories du rocher de Monemvasia. Dites moi si je je fais pour vos photos ,, je ne suis pas sur de tout reconnaître la localisation. Patrice78500 (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Church organs
Why did you create a new cat in Belgium? There is already an existing category. --Carolus (talk) 21:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Government buildings in Amiens has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
142.254.26.9 11:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Mairies in France has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Havang(nl) (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20151106 lyon227.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
CptViraj (📧) 12:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Ladders (architecture) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 20:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Roof lanterns has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Préaus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Geraki TLG 19:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Postcards
Thanks for uploading postcards in Category:Postcards uploaded by user Jean Housen. Maybe you are interessted in COM:WPPC. -- sk (talk) 15:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Piraeus-Patras railway has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
WIJIDE (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Castles in Lefkada has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Constantine ✍ 19:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina60.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina61.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina72.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina73.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina78.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina79.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina80.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090802 athina81.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20190514 752 athenes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20190514 759 athenes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20160516 352 thessaloniki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20190513 442 athenes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20190513 443 athenes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20190513 444 athenes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20190513 445 athenes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Churches in Belgium
Hi Jean,
- No message was here at this unsigned comment, perhaps it alluded to "Category:Churches in Belgium". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Horst J. Meuter / Deine Änderungen / Deine anmaßende Unverschämtheit
- Horst J. Meuter / your changes / your presumptuous insolence Translated in case Jean Housen doesn't understand German. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
(Are you su dumb ? this picture is taken in 2018. July….)
This line is here, is this already resolved? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
So die Anrede an mich!!
Zunächst eine kurze Vorbemerkung, weitere folgen:
Sicherlich nicht dumb genug, um mich von irgendjemandem, der offensichtlich meint, eine Größe darzustellen, beleidigen zu lassen.
Zur Sache:
In den von mir hochgeladenen Dateien wurde eine wichtige, meines Erachtens sehr wichtige, Kategorie gelöscht, nämlich die Kategorie TOM FRANZEN. Eine logische Begründung hierfür sehe ich nicht!
Ersetzt wurde diese durch die unsinnigen Kategorien „2018 in Trevuren“ sowie durch July 2018 in Belgium“
Ich frage mich, für wen es auch nur von geringster Bedeutung ist, wann diese Aufnahme genommen wurde. Für den interessierten Betrachter ist es von Wichtigkeit, einen Bezug herstellen zu können, zwischen dem abgelichteten Kunstwerk und dem Künstler bzw. umgekehrt. Daher die Kategorisierung „TOM FRANTZEN.“ Zumal dieser bedeutende Künstler, dessen Werke vielerorts in Brüssel und weit darüber hinaus in Belgien zu sehen sind, von Usern bereits mit einer eigenen Kategorie bedacht wurde. Diese Fragen hätte man aber sicher diskutieren können!
- This seems to be an old discussion which is likely resolved. This user primarily communicates in French. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Nicht diskutieren kann man allerdings das Auftreten, die Umgangsformen, das sprachliche sowie das intellektuelle Niveau des Users JEANHOUSEN.
Auf der Diskussionsseite dieses Users steht u.a. zu lesen: „Dieser Benutzer geht von guten Absichten aus und glaubt an höfliche Umgangsformen.“
Angesichts der oben aufgeführten Anrede an mich, halte ich diese Zeile eher für eine missglückte humoristische Einlage.
- Not sure if this is a very collegial way to address someone. Either way, this user is most proficient is French. So maybe they did not understand the German text.
- ▰
- {{Green|This user's discussion page reads, among other things:§"This user has good intentions and believes in polite manners."
- In view of the above address to me, I think this line is rather a failed humorous contribution.
- Translated it. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Are you alright?
Haven't seen you contribute in a time, is everything alright?
Usually you are one of the most prolific photographers in the Benelux area, missing your wonderful work. And I hope that you are healthy and happy. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Cute_grey_kitten.jpg/150px-Cute_grey_kitten.jpg)
Hope you are doing well in life, as it's unusual for you to take such a long break. Hope that it was fully in your control and not due to unfortunate outside circumstances.
Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20140415 ioannina494.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20140415 ioannina492.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20140415 ioannina493.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:20190628 aachen165.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen166.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen167.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen168.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen169.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen170.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen171.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen172.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen173.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen174.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen175.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen178.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20090729 argolikos08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 13:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:20190628 aachen002.jpg
- File:20190628 aachen024.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen077.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen078.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen079.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen080.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen081.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen082.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen083.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen084.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen085.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen086.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen087.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen088.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen089.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen090.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen091.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen092.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen093.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen094.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen095.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen096.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen097.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen098.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen099.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen100.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen101.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen102.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen103.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen104.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen105.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen106.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen107.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen108.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen109.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen111.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen112.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen113.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen114.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen115.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen117.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen119.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen120.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen122.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen123.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen124.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen127.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen128.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen130.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen131.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen132.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen134.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen135.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen137.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen139.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen142.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen143.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen144.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen145.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen146.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen147.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen149.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen150.jpg
- File:20211013 aachen151.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 13:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Buildings_in_Breda_by_type has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 09:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Category:Bakeries in Greece
Dear colleague, I will not discuss our different edits in above-mentioned category. However, it seems that you want to insult me and/or other wikimedians, writing at the end of your edit summary: « My God, most of wikimedians are mono-maniac cyclop with binary brain ??? » I just recommend you: « Take a wiki-rest ! » --Elkost (talk) 14:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 16:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Sculptures of maenads has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 04:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Streets named after Marseille has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Fr.Latreille (talk) 21:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 20180729 003 mochamps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Views_of_pont_du_Milieu_(Fribourg) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Enhancing999 (talk) 06:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
@Jeanhousen: imo this category should be renamed ad per {(Q|2168770)}. What do you think? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20100412 egine74.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20100412 egine77.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20100412 egine76.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20100412 egine78.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20100412 egine79.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20100412 egine80.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Pillars in the Netherlands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 05:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20160722 082 libramont.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20160722 020 libramont.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20160513 019 amphipolis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ptyx (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20160518 146 edessa site.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Choliamb (talk) 22:28, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Findings from Epidavros has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Furius (talk) 11:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:20151106 lyon030.jpg
- File:20151106 lyon031.jpg
- File:20151106 lyon032.jpg
- File:20151106 lyon073.jpg
Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:20211030 athenes401.jpg
- File:20211101 091 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 093 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 095 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 096 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 097 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 098 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 106 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 107 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 128 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 129 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 134 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 135 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 136 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 142 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 143 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 184 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 185 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 187 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 199 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 200 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 201 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 202 athens.jpg
- File:20211101 205 athens.jpg
- File:20211102 171 athenes.jpg
- File:20211102 207 athenes.jpg
- File:20211102 211 athenes.jpg
- File:20211102 212 athenes.jpg
- File:20211103 078 peiraia.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes013.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes014.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes056.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes057.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes058.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes068.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes069.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes070.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes079.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes094.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes096.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes097.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes106.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes107.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes108.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes112.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes118.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes141.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes142.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes143.jpg
- File:20211104 athenes151.jpg
- File:20221026 Athenes 0016.jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Rws
Hi Jeanhousen
I noticed you changed the categorization of some rws in Switzerland, e.g. by creating small categories like Category:Railway stations in Aarau. I'm not sure if there is much value added by doing so. Most stations can easily be found by name or canton. Breaking down cantons by these constantly changing municipalities wont help much. People can still find them through other categories when searching by municipality is needed. Maybe 15 is a good threshold before creating a new category, but if then it's not really needed. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)