User talk:Jan Polák/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Stredni-delici-pas-Napajedla.JPG is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Zuzeni.jpg is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Pricny-prah.JPG is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Opticka-brzda.JPG is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Miniokruzka.JPG is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Pricny-prah-Suchdol.jpg is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Sikany.JPG is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Huillier-souradnice.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Huillier-b.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Huillier-a.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Huillier-zaklad.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Huillier-c.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luhačovice - pramen Svatého Josefa.jpg was uncategorized on 4 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Luhačovice - Jurkovičův dům.jpg was uncategorized on 4 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: Image:Lazne Libverda - Obri sud - vystavba.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Lazne Libverda - Obri sud - vystavba.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: Image:Lazne Libverda - Urbar.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Lazne Libverda - Urbar.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Licence, kterou jste uvedl, jsou nesprávné. Autorem fotografie sudu nejste vy, stejně jako nejste autorem urbáře. Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
A ještě jednu věc ke kategorizaci. Podle c:Categorisation se obrázky mají zařazovat jen do "nejnižší (tj. nejspecifičtější) možné kategorie". Fotografie Lázní Libverda tudíž patří jen do kategorie "Lázně Libverda", nikoli však do kategorie "Czech Republic". Pokud potřebujete s něčím poradit, neváhejte se na mě obrátit, rád pomůžu. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Dialog-warning.svg/45px-Dialog-warning.svg.png)
![NC](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Cc-nc_white.svg/12px-Cc-nc_white.svg.png)
![ND](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Cc-nd_white.svg/12px-Cc-nd_white.svg.png)
![Copyright](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Copyright.svg/12px-Copyright.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![SA](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/15px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
![CC0](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Cc-zero_white.svg/15px-Cc-zero_white.svg.png)
![PDM](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg/15px-Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg.png)
ZooFari 18:37, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hnik.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hnik.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 10:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Jan Polák. You have new messages at Jacklee's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Files you uploaded may be deleted
The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 04:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kostel_U_Jákobova_žebříku_-_dříve.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kostel_U_Jákobova_žebříku_-_dříve.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kostel_U_Jákobova_žebříku_-_dříve.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Podzemnik (talk) 12:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Truhlářka.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Truhlářka.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Truhlářka.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Podzemnik (talk) 12:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Dobrý den, Vy asi nebudete autorem, není-liž pravda? Mohl byste to případně poopravit, nejlépe dodat i zdroj? Jinak k výše zmíněným fotografiím: autor fotografie z roku 1988 může být těžko autora, který je 70 let po smrti :-) Nejspíše se jedná o omyl. --Podzemnik (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Jsem autorem obrázku File:Síť pozemních komunikací v Praze.jpg.--Jan Polák (talk) 08:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Josef_Smolík.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gumruch (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Embassies
Správné kategorie by měly být Canadian, Norwegian, Brazilian, Peruvian, Thai, já vím, sám jsem v některých názvech fotek udělal chybu, ale měla by to být adjektiva ne názvy států - viz názvy kategorií u jiných měst. Jinak díky ... Krokodyl (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Upřímně řečeno, tušil jsem to. Ale říkal jsem si, když je to tak u té fotky, tak je to asi správně. Klidně to ale změň.--Jan Polák (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Á, tak evidetně již k přejmenování došlo. Díky za to.--Jan Polák (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Commons_Autopatrolled.svg/50px-Commons_Autopatrolled.svg.png)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Jan Polák, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
![]() |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 09:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Valčíkova 1587.jpg
Trochu jsem ten barák narovnal. Snad Ti to nebude proti mysli. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 17:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Mohu Tě uklidnit, že mi to není proti mysli a zároveň Ti za to děkuji. --Jan Polák (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Evangelical church (Klášter nad Dědinou) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
RomanM82 (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Jan Polák, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
![]() |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Jan Polák, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
![]() |
Adresa jako název kategorie
Zdravím. Narazil jsem na pár tebou založených kategorií (mimochodem, díky za pěkné fotky i pečlivé popisování a kategorizaci) a to přivedlo moji pozornost k historii tvých editací, konkrétně tebou založených kategorií pojmenovaných podle konkrétní adresy. Tvoje zvyklosti se totiž trochu liší od mých a tudíž by se mi zdálo vhodné hledat nějakou cestu ke sjednocení. Každý z nás asi svůj styl hledá tak, že se nejprve dívá, co používají ostatní, a co se mu zdá nejlepší, toho se pak drží. Já jsem se prozatím ustálil na této praxi:
- Lze-li budovu pojmenovat podle účelu a je-li takové pojmenování dostatečně určité, preferuji jej před adresou (to je u nás na české Wikipedii celkem obvyklé, ale všiml jsem si, že v některých jazycích/zemích dělali přejmenování kategorií opačným směrem, tedy z názvu na adresu). Pokud takové označení není v českém prostředí vnímáno jako vlastní jméno, upřednostňuji přívlastek s předložkovou vazbou (Sokol house in..., Church of Saint Andrew in...), pokud má blíže k vlastnímu jménu, pak upřednostňuji nepřeložený český název s případným rozlišovačem v závorce - ovšem v praxi existuje mnoho přechodných a mezních typů - třeba všelijaká ta Národní divadla a podobně, vlastně i ty kostely, takže někdy i vlastní jméno je lépe přeložit, jindy je zase ustálené obecné označení natolik specifické, že i rodilý Angličan by budovu v mapě či Googlem našel spíše pod českým názvem než pod ad hoc přeloženým.
- Pokud v daném sídelním útvaru nejsou pojmenovány ulice a tedy ani přidělena čísla orientační, používal jsem původně názvy kategorií ve formátu "Kotěhůlky 6", avšak nedávno jsem se začal přiklánět k názvů typu "Kotěhůlky čp. 6", protože v některých městečkách se to mohlo plést s jakýmsi označením obvodů či místních částí, někde i s orientačními čísly (je mnoho městeček, kde kdysi byla zavedena orientační čísla a na některých domech jsou dosud vyznačena, ale v oficiálním registru adres už nejsou a nově se nepřidělují). Ze dvou správných obvyklých variant zkratky ("čp." a "č. p.") a jedné chybné ("č.p.") jsem vybral tu nejkratší. Pokud existuje více sídelních útvarů téhož názvu (zejména jsou-li některé další také místními částmi s vlastní řadou čísel popisných), snažím se pamatovat na rozlišovač, ten však umisťuji standardním způsobem až za adresu (jedině na konci kategorie funguje v software MediaWiki technicky skutečně jako rozlišovač - tj. lze například v odkazu potlačit svislítkem), nikoliv hned na název sídla (je to lepší i kvůli našeptávači, když by někdo adresu zadával).
- Pokud v daném sídelním útvaru jsou pojmenovány ulice, většinou pro název kategorie používám formát "Ulice číslo" (Národní 36). Nemá-li taková obec (či jednotlivá budova) číslo orientační, snažím se také použít zkratku "čp." (protože v obci s pojmenovanými ulicemi je příliš pravděpodobné, že tam někdy čísla orientační byla anebo že by mohla být zavedena). Má-li budova číslo orientační, používám v názvu kategorie jen to. Nějakou dobu jsem váhal a dosud váhám, protože popisná čísla jsou přece jen starší a stabilnější, ale pro řazení a hledání v kategorii podle adresy jsou orientační čísla hned za názvem ulice o něco vhodnější. Lomítkům se vyhýbám, protože mohou v různých skriptech působit problémy, ostatně např. v názvech souborů je ani nelze použít. Převracet pořadí na orientační/popisné už by vůbec nebyl dobrý nápad. Je-li nutný rozlišovač (protože v jiné obci může existovat ulice téhož názvu, popřípadě má nějaká obec stejný název jako daná ulice), používám jej opět až za číslem ("Husova 14 (Rakovník)").
- Problémem zůstávají ta města, kde je zvykem rohové či blokové budovy či budovy s více vchody či průčelími přiřazovat k více adresám zároveň, tedy například přířazovat je k více ulicím zároveň, dávat jim více čísel orientačních (pro jednotlivé vchody anebo přiřazené ulice) apod. Někdy se dá vytušit, která z těch adres je hlavní (podle adres organizací či živnostníků sídlících v dané budově), pak postupuji podle předchozího bodu a pro budovu použiji jen tuto adresu. Ve složitějších případech zatím volím z širší škály řešení: buď přece jen vybrat jednu z adres, i když se ty adresy jeví rovnocenné, nebo upřednostním označení názvem čtvrti a číslem popisným před adresou s názvem ulice a číslem orientačním, anebo použiji v názvu kategorie dvě adresy zároveň (formát "Smetanovo nábřeží 6 - Divadelní 5").
Nehrnu se do toho, že bych "svoje" nebo "cizí" kategorie chtěl hromadně přejmenovávat, i když časem možná i na to někde dojde, aspoň při sjednocování v rámci jedné ulice či města. Spíš to myslím jako námět k zamyšlení, zda se od sebe vzájemně můžeme inspirovat či vůbec se časem na nějaké praxi ustálit. Není to nic, co by bylo nutno lámat přes koleno, ale přece jen se v tom pak lépe orientuje. --ŠJů (talk) 21:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Zdravím, já se nějaké standardizaci nebráním. Jak správně uvádíš, sám jsem si nějakou stanovil, když jsem před tím problémem s umístěním fotografií stál a nic vhodnějšího (či ustálenějšího) jsem nenašel.
- Výše popsaný přehled se mi zdá příliš složitý. Pro snadnější začleňování by, myslím, bylo vhodné sestavit jasná jednoduchá pravidla (ideálně třeba i s nějakým základním česko-anglickým slovníčkem). --Jan Polák (talk) 19:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)