User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, facadde.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Świętego Krzyża w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, left part of frieze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, right part of Frieze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk statue in Nowa Ruda (Piastów Street).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Kościelna Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Świętego Krzyża w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 07:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 7, 7a 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 7, 7a 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 7, 7a 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 23 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Kościelna Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Kościelna Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Kościelna Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Kościelna Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Kościelna 12 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Kościelna 12 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Kościelna 12 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Cmentarna 23, kartusz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But who´s COA is it? That´s where the work begins :-) --Ermell 08:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Nowej Rudzie - Drogosławiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Nowej Rudzie (ul. Cmentarna) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Nowej Rudzie (ul. Cmentarna) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Kościelna 10 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:54, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Kościelna 10 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Kościelna 12 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Kościelna Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk statue in Nowa Ruda (Piastów Street), chronogram.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Drogosław, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Drogosław, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Nowej Rudzie - Drogosławiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Nowej Rudzie - Drogosławiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Nowej Rudzie - Drogosławiu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Nowej Rudzie - Drogosławiu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Nowej Rudzie - Drogosławiu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica loretańska w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica loretańska w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica loretańska w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Drogosław, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Drogosław, stairs and porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krystyna Toczyńska-Rudysz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joseph Wittig.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Szkoła Podstawowa nr 3 w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Szkoła Podstawowa nr 3 w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Nowa Ruda, spire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Figura Trójcy Świętej w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Figura Trójcy Świętej w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Figura Trójcy Świętej w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Figura Trójcy Świętej w Nowej Rudzie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Figura Trójcy Świętej w Nowej Rudzie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Mural w Nowej Rudzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ElBute 10:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Niepodległości 56 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 08:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Niepodległości 56 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is tilted, could you fix it, please? --Basotxerri 08:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 13:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 14:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Nowej Rudzie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, ul. Łukasińskiego 26 (magazyn koszarowy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, ul. Łukasińskiego 28 (magazyn koszarowy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł śś. Piotra i Pawła w Tłumaczowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko Wysoki Kamień, Góry Izerskie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko Wysoki Kamień, Góry Izerskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mateusza w Kochanowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mateusza w Kochanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mateusza w Kochanowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mateusza w Kochanowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Kudowie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 19:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Anioł przed mauzoleum von Magnisów w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Anioły przed mauzoleum von Magnisów w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schron turystyczny na Górze Wszystkich Świętych 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ElBute 11:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schron turystyczny na Górze Wszystkich Świętych 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ElBute 11:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Kaczorowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Kaczorowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Kaczorowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Kaczorowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Kaczorowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niepodległości Street in Nowa Ruda, mural with cursed soldiers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity statue in Nowa Ruda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Tłumaczów, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Tłumaczów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Park Wenecja w Sulistrowiczkach, brama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Park Wenecja w Sulistrowiczkach, brama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół bł. Karoliny Kózki w Kaczorowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Kudowie-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good interesting perspective, but a bit overprocessed (especially the white parts of the church) --Michielverbeek 11:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)@Michielverbeek: Where? --Jacek Halicki 18:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC) The white/yellow parts of the church. I start doubting if overprocessed is the right word , but I think it is better to make it a bit darker; it hurts my eyes a bit like this --Michielverbeek 06:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Well done --Michielverbeek 07:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wysoki Kamień Hostel, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Matthew church in Kochanów, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Matthew church in Kochanów, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Matthew church in Kochanów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, spichlerz 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wieża kościoła ewangelickiego w Karpnikach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 01:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Droga w Karpnikach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --A.Savin 01:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Krzyżna Góra, Góry Sokole, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek w Karpnikach 8, armata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good image, but please fix title and description to reflect what the image is showing.--Peulle 10:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 11:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Comment Please include the word "Cannon" (in Polish is OK) in the image file name. :)--Peulle 12:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 13:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Support Yes, that's what I'm talking about; now people can find it by searching for it. :) It's a go for QI.--Peulle 13:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wieża kościoła ewangelickiego w Karpnikach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:34, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tąpadła, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tąpadła, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tąpadła, water well.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tąpadła, inscription informing about the underground.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, stajnia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, stajnia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 00:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Łomnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 00:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Łomnicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 01:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, kuźnia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, kuźnia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landscape park Wenecja in Sulistrowiczki, upper gate, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tąpadła, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Łomnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Łomnicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Kaczorów, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Czermna, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karpniki Castle, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karpniki Castle, stone bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, druga stodoła w parku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Park w Łomnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Bukowcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Łomnicy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, stodoły w parku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karpniki Castle, wooden footbridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karpniki Castle, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karpniki Castle, cannon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protestant church in Karpniki, tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Łomnicy, pierwsza stodoła w parku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Park w Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rudawy Janowickie, Krzyżna Moumtain, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Łomnica, southwestern part.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Łomnica, granary, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Łomnica, forge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Wawrzyńca w Krzeszówku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Wawrzyńca w Krzeszówku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Plebania w Krzeszówku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK but it would be better to crop out the blue sign on the right handside. --Basotxerri 10:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Bukowcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bukowiec, pl. Kościelny 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bukowiec, pl. Kościelny 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Wawrzyńca w Krzeszówku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Łomnica, first former barn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Łomnica, second former barn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łomnica Palace, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Łomnica, former stable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Wawrzyńca w Krzeszówku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Plebania w Krzeszówku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łomnica Palace, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łomnica Palace, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Łomnica, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łomnica Palace Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Tablica informacyjna w Tąpadłach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Tąpadłach 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko na szczycie Ślęży 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko na szczycie Ślęży 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Bukowiec, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Bukowiec, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Krzeszówek, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Krzeszówek, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko Szwajcarka w Karpnikach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Karpniki, aleja lipowa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Karpniki, aleja lipowa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Krzeszówek, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łomnica Palace Park, Stefan Andres memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tąpadła, door in the main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good Q.--Lmbuga 03:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jawornicy 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good IMO--Lmbuga 02:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Lmbuga 03:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loreto chapel in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loreto chapel in Nowa Ruda, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loreto chapel in Nowa Ruda, crucifixion group.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Market Square in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół ewangelicko-reformowany w Pstrążnej 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół ewangelicko-reformowany w Pstrążnej 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 10:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Lipa szerokolistna w Pstrążnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Lipa szerokolistna w Pstrążnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Lipa szerokolistna w Pstrążnej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szwajcarka Hostel, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lime avenue in Karpniki,.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in Jawornica, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

[edit]

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dawna remiza strażacka w Pstrąznej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nagrobki przy kościele ewangelickim w Pstrążnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Staw w Pstrążnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dom nr 12 w Pstrążnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Tablica informacyjna w Pstrążnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:11, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przejście graniczne Lutynia - Travna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przejście graniczne Lutynia - Travna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The church seems to be tilted down to the right in this one. Just toggle back and forth between this and the 02.jpg version of a similar view, and you'll see what I saw. -- Ikan Kekek 10:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 15:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me now. -- Ikan Kekek 02:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in Jawornica, altarpiece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reformed church in Pstrążna, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tilia platyphyllos in Pstrążna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lądecka Pass, Lutynia(Poland) - Travna(Czech Republic) border crossing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in Jawornica, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac i folwark w Wojanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 00:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Kłodzku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Kłodzku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dawny kościół w Radomierzu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A difficult angle. Nothing wrong with the quality of the photo but I would suggest you cropped out the most disturbing things at the borders. See note. W.carter 21:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 21:31, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. :) Good quality. --W.carter 21:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Kłodzku 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Kłodzku 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Kłodzku 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Wieża widokowa na górze Smrek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Szrenica, Karkonosze, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Łabski Szczyt, Karkonosze, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 00:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Łabski Szczyt, Karkonosze, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Łabski Szczyt, Karkonosze, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 00:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Śnieżne Stawki, Karkonosze, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail --Daniel Case 04:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Śnieżne Stawki, Karkonosze, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail; liked the hikers going down --Daniel Case 04:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Schronisko na Szrenicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Schronisko na Szrenicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek Książ 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The lion is good and all but the trees, especially on the right side are noisy and have some jpeg artifacts. Think you could smooth this over a bit? W.carter 10:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 13:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice. Good quality. --W.carter 20:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek Książ 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Zamek Książ 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Wielki Śnieżny Kocioł, Karkonosze, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower in Radomierz, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace and folwark in Wojanów, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smrk (Jizera Mountains, observation tower).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Wielki Szyszak, Karkonosze, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely. --Peulle 23:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Wielki Szyszak, Karkonosze, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. Plenty of light available. --Peulle 23:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Wielki Śnieżny Kocioł, Karkonosze, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 07:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kopalnia Stanisław w Szklarskiej Porębie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 00:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Wielki Szyszak, Karkonosze, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Wielki Szyszak, Karkonosze, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Czarna Góra, Góry Izerskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kopalnia Stanisław w Szklarskiej Porębie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kopalnia Stanisław w Szklarskiej Porębie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Konica Auto S3 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 E-papieros mod 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 E-papieros mod 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:09, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szrenica, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mountain hut on Szrenica, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park in Książ, lion sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łabski Szczyt, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kodak 355 X Instamatic 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kodak 355 X Instamatic 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Agfa Optima 5000 Pocket 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Agfa Optima 5000 Pocket 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Agfa Optima 5000 Pocket 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Laitche 00:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Konica Auto S3 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

VI differences

[edit]

Hi Jacek - as enthusiastic VI editors we shouldn't really be fighting. We both have clear objectives. I just feel that we shouldn't be swamping VI with too many nominations that devalue the project. It is nothing personal and I know it isn't for you either (thanks for votes on my FP candidates). I do pick on everyone... Best wishes, Charles.... Hi. You're right, we shouldn't fight. You think that I'm adding too much pictures, I think that a lot of your pictures are unsharp. The best thing we can do is not bothering ourselves, because it won't change anything. I'm not going to get in your way, you shouldn't either. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC) That may be the only solution :) Charles (talk) 20:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śnieżne Kotły, Śnieżne Stawki, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śnieżne Kotły, Wielki Śnieżny Kocioł, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jizera Mountains, Czarna Góra, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jizera Mountains, Stanisław Mine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Graniczna Łąka i Szrenica, Karkonosze, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), power supply Wismec Reuleaux RX 2/3 and vaporizer SvoëMesto Kayfun V4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Konica Auto S3, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Konica Auto S3, case.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodak Instamatic 355-X, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Tamron SP AF 70-200mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 10:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Statyw fotograficzny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 10:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Osłona przeciwsłoneczna obiektywu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 10:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wyzwalacz kablowy Sony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 10:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Sony DSLR-A700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 10:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodak Instamatic 355-X, case.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Grip Sony N50 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Grip Sony N50 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Sony DSLR-A700 z gripem N50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lens hoods, tulip lens hood.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agfa Optima 5000, front view with flash.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agfa Optima 5000, back view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nysa Kłodzka w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 03:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare miasto w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 03:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare miasto w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare miasto w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare miasto w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Minox C 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Posąg św. Jana Nepomucena w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nysa Kłodzka w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare miasto w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare miasto w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare miasto w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wieża ratusza w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cable releases, for Sony Alpha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sony battery grips, model N50, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sony battery grips, model N50, back view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sony DSLR-A700, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pręgierz w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP-candidate

[edit]

Hallo Jacek, I sent you an Email with a link concerning your withdrawn FPC candidate. Greetings --Llez (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum minerałów w Złotym Stoku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 01:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Laski, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Gnom w Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Gnom w Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality also if backgroun is not the best --Livioandronico2013 09:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Leśny Park Przygody w Złotym Stoku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 12:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Willa Hubertus w Złotym Stoku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 12:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2016 Pałac w Łomnicy 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Pałac w Łomnicy 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, kolejka 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, kolejka 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, in general. -- Ikan Kekek 01:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, restauracja 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, tunel 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, tunel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality and composition. -- Ikan Kekek 00:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, restauracja 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Idzikowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, kościół ewangelicki 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Karczowicach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia, pomnik poległych.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia 30 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, trzecia oficyna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Karczowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:15, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie

[edit]

Drogi użytkowniku, jest problem. Na jakiej podstawie wykorzystałeś moją fotografię udostępniając ją na Wiki, dodając licencje??!! Jako autor nie wyraziłem zgody na kopiowanie i modyfikację mojego zdjęcia?

Oryginał http://dolny-slask.org.pl/827472,foto.html Kopia z której został ściągnięty plik: http://kozuchow.fotopolska.eu/118675,foto.html?o=b7593 Plik na Wiki: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ratusz_w_Ko%C5%BCuchowie_-_Fotopolska.jpg

Proszę o natychmiastowe usunięcie tej fotografii oraz innych jeśli dopuściłeś się do takiego "pożyczenia" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmaciek13 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dom Książąt Brzeskich w Strzelinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 17b 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 15 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'd remove the blurred bird --Llez 05:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)✓ DoneJacek Halicki 09:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, good quality --Llez 11:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 15 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Spoko. Właśnie po to są te szablony, że w wygodnu sposób poprosić o uzupełnienie danych. Już poleciał. Masur (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC) ps. jak przypoinasz sobie inne pliki o podobnym statusie prawnym, to mi wklej, to uporządkuję. Masur (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Krzeszowie, 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Krzeszowie, 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Budynek dworca autobusowego w Strzelinie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some holiday joy

[edit]

Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! --cart-Talk 15:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

[edit]
* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little unsharp on the right side, but good overall quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Tomicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Tomicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1. Good relation between sun and shadow --Michielverbeek 06:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stare chomąto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dom Książąt Brzeskich w Strzelinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]