User talk:GJo

Welcome to the Commons, GJo!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Maratea infreschidamaratea.jpg

Scusa, perchè ti ostini ad inserire una foto di MARATEA (Pz), BASILICATA, nelle categorie AMANTEA e CALABRIA??? la foto è "infreschidamaratea.jpg" Non che me ne importi molto, ma Amantea è a circa 150 km da Maratea, quella foto non c'entra NIENTE con la CALABRIA e con AMANTEA. Il luogo è MARATEA, non AMANTEA, sono due luoghi completamente DIVERSI e DISTANTI, e MARATEA NON E' in CALABRIA, e il luogo che si vede è parte in BASILICATA, parte in CAMPANIA (Policastro,punta infreschi, capo PALINURO, note località della CAMPANIA). Ribadisco, il luogo è MARATEA ed è a circa CENTOCINQUANTA km da AMANTEA, ed è in BASILICATA, non in CALABRIA. Forse l'assonanza fonetica (mara-TEA/aman-TEA), ti ha tratto in inganno. Poi, se vuoi insistere, sono problemi tuoi, ma certamente non contribuisci alla chiarezza e alla crescita di wiki, anzi crei solo confusione. ciao

Cittanova

Ciao,

La stemma di Cittanova è sulla WP:fr. Grazie.

Peccato che non cambiassi il nome della stemma: Cittanova-Stemma.png!

Saluti jpm2112 06:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC) (WP:fr)[reply]

Image:Leest_2005.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Leest_2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Butseriouslyfolks 17:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rashomon.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Rashomon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Benjamin.pineau 18:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian comma diacritic

I'm sorry, I had to revert a few of your changes in various projects. You drew Image:T e S con virgola e con cediglia.svg, but the shape of the „comma below” diacritic is wrong, or at least not recognizable as a comma and too similar to a sedilla. It may be the font you used, but I think for the reader to understand the normal shape of that diacritic we need to use less artistic and more standard fonts. AdiJapan 06:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no, it's not acceptable. The whole point of this image is for the reader to see the exact shape of the diacritics. That is why I recommend the Times New Roman font, or something very similar, because the letters have classic shapes, known to everyone. I will make the SVG myself, just give me some time. AdiJapan 04:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me again. Here is the SVG version of the same image: Image:Virguliţa şi sedila.svg. AdiJapan 11:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for categorizing the images. AdiJapan 17:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Val_di_Susa_e_Torino_dalla_Sacra_di_San_Michele_02.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 19:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:OCR-A sample.svg and Image:OCR-B sample.svg

"The quick brown fox jumps..." not "jump" --Ephraim33 08:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JaneAlexander.JPG

Pay attention to copyright

Image:JaneAlexander.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-BlueAzure 02:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 1737fbe5dd51dbc6032f74cda44e9e90

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Genova

Ciao GJo. E' vero, sul sito della Provincia di Genova c'è lo stemma incriminato, ma è un errore (anche le Province possono sbagliare). La corona della Provincia è caratterizzata da un diadema con pietre preziose rosse e verdi; la corona delle città è caratterizzata (come è logico) dalle mura di una città. Il guaio per Genova è che lo stemma è uguale e quindi facilmente confondibile. Ma è la corona che distingue chiaramente di che cosa si tratta; se hai dei dubbi, vai a vedere tutti gli stemmi delle Province italiane. Io non voglio fare una guerra per questo stemma; ma ribadisco che il tuo rollback è errato! Ciao! --DenghiùComm (talk) 18:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Ma adesso abbiamo tutti e due gli stemmi (identici) con corone diverse, considerati entrambi stemma della Provincia di Genova. Come la mettiamo? --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC) PS: Colgo l'occasione per farti notare che c'è attualmente un marasma nei titoli, tutti uguali nella sostanza, ma con "PROVINCE" scritta ora in maiuscolo, ora in minuscolo. Sarebbe il caso di decidere quale debba essere la forma corretta, e poi creare delle redirect per tutte le altre. Che ne pensi? Perché attualmente, se sbagli a scrivere in maiuscolo o in minuscolo, la categoria semplicemente non te la dà. Il che mi sembra un manicomio... Vogliamo distinguere "la provincia" come istituzione dalla provincia come area geografica? A chi daremo la maiuscola e a chi la minuscola? Facciamo "la Provincia" (istituzione) e "la provincia" (area geografica)? Ciao! --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Font template

Regarding this image and others like it, what software and/or file did you use to generate this? There are other fonts that could benefit from the same treatment. Evertype (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately Inkscape doesn't work for me. Thanks though. Evertype (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License

It has been found that Image:Provincia di Caserta-Stemma.png has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Filbot.--Filnik 14:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, GJo!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cross bottony.jpg is uncategorized since 1 July 2009.

blason des villes sous Napoléon

Un grand MERCI pour tout ces blasons c'est superbe encore merci Ludo--81.66.108.136 16:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sersale-Stemma.png

File:Sersale-Stemma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Fale (talk) 20:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cittanova-Stemma.png

File:Cittanova-Stemma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Fale (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stemma_Principe_Eugenio

Boujour GJo,

Je viens de tomber sur les armoiries de Eugène de Beauharnais :

http://cid-16c9f4f69987240b.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Stemma%5E_Principe%5E_Eugenio.jpg

Je souhaitais savoir quelle était la source. Cordialement,--Jimmy44 (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Corona en CoA Città di Ferrara.svg

Hola. He visto que has utilizado la corona File:Corona de duque.svg para este escudo File:CoA Città di Ferrara.svg. Rediseñemos la corona y generemos este fichero: File:Corona de duque 2.svg sustituyendo el degradado por rallas, para que heráldicamente fuese correcta al no contener un degradado. Ciao! --Xavigivax (talk) 12:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No hay problema en dibujarlo, parece sencillo. Más que a la española, diría que es al estilo de los escudos de municipios de la corona catalano-aragonesa. Cuartelado en aspa (sotuer)1 y 4 de Aragón, con lo que los esmaltes están claros. El problema son el 2 y 3, que esmaltes utilizo? de azur un castillo de argén sobre ondas de argén y azur? En España actualmente no hay tradición de usar esa forma, aunque sea la única genuina para los municipios, ahora, solo se ven en algunas partes del antiguo reino de Aragón, en la parte de Aragón que toca con Cataluña, algunos de Valencia y eso sí, todos los que se han oficializado recientemente de Cataluña (la mayoría los he hecho yo (User:Xavigivax/Escudos). Si encontrases una fuente escrita del escudo sería mucho más fácil. Mañana te presentaré una propuesta. [1] Aquí aparece un castillo amarillo sobre blanco, pero eso es incorrecto... también se ven las cabezas de moro y la cruz que aparece en el escudo actual de la comunidad de Aragón. Bueno, a ver que encuentro y mañana te preparo un escudo. --Xavigivax (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

La cruz de San Andrés es un sotuer o aspa, lo tradicional es blasonarlo como "Cuartelado en aspa" o "Cuartelado en sotuer". Los castillos siempre son "torricelli" (torreados) y la torre del homenaje siempre es más alta. Eso ya viene implícito con "castillo", es como lo del león, no hace falta decir rampante. Lo único que hay que cambiar es que el segundo y el tercero van de gules, con un mar de plata y azur sumado a un castillo al natural abierto sobre unas rocas. Lo cambio y te aviso. --Xavigivax (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ya he subido una nueva versión del escudo. No he puesto ornamentos externos. Si crees que hace falta la corona, ya se la añadiré. --Xavigivax (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

como la voz del escudo ¡Eso no lo entiendo! vaya tela con el traductor automático... dimelo en italiano, que seguro que es mejor que una traducción automática. --Xavigivax (talk) 10:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 11969b6a867b2021e62effa255c14c8b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Comune di Ferrara

Nella mia talk puoi trovare le spiegazioni dell'edit che hai rollbackato. Anche io la penso come te... però dovremmo decidere uno standard... se no facciamo editwars (anche perchè lui ha modificato una ventina di immagini e tu ne hai rollbackata una sola). Fale (talk) 07:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arms of Joseph Bonaparte

Hello GJo!

The Coat of arms of Joseph Bonaparte as King of Spain is based on two written and very reliable sources:

[2] &
[3].

The King didn’t use the bees in the mantle as you can check in these sources.

I’ve moved your work at File:Arms of Joseph Bonaparte (Napoleonic Mantle).svg because I know it is based on [4] but the two mentioned sources are more reliable.

Thanking you for your cooperation.

--Buho07 (talk) 16:23, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Insurrezione di Palermo o Presa?

Ciao, scusa il ritardo nel risponderti. Generalmente i testi storici parlano dell' "Insurrezione di Palermo" del 1860 riferendosi alla "Rivolta della Gancia" avvenuta nell'aprile di quell'anno. Io ho titolato la categoria "Presa di Palermo" perché mi sembrava la denominazione più indicata, ma se hai un'idea migliore, ben venga. Che suggerisci ? --Ligabo (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Entrambi i titoli mi convincono poco perché sono parziali (nel senso del totale), ovvero si riferiscono a fatti (non gli unici) che si sono conclusi con la presa della città. Sfoglio un po' di volumi dell'epoca per trovare le denominazioni più usate e poi le valutiamo.
--Ligabo (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le moltissime pubblicazioni citano prevalentemente "Presa di Palermo" o "Entrata di Garibaldi a Palermo", ma vengono usate anche definizioni come "Resa di Palermo", "Battaglia di Palermo", "Combattimento di Palermo", "Capitolazione di Palermo", "Caduta di Palermo".
Visto che fatti similari (grosso modo) sono accaduti anche a Messina, Reggio Calabria, Soveria e Napoli, direi di usare il prefisso "Resa di ..." per i 5 eventi. Giusto per dare un poco di uniformità all'indice.
Per quanto riguarda l'opportunità di tradurre in inglese o lasciare in italiano, decidi tu: io dell'inglese senza il traduttore automatico riesco a decifrare solo "yes" e "sorry". :)
--Ligabo (talk) 10:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK (3º e ultimo termine inglese che conosco). Sto cercando di riorganizzare la categorizzazione della Spedizione dei Mille. Quando ho terminato ti faccio un fischio, così dai un'occhiata alla funzionalità dell'ambaradan. Alla prossima. --Ligabo (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:S-sharp-s-Cambria.svg

File:S-sharp-s-Cambria.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.170.180 16:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CorbelSpec.svg

File:CorbelSpec.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.170.180 17:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monumento a Garibaldi

Mi sarà sfuggito, l'ho ripristinato. Stavo ricategorizzando tutti i monumenti e avrò tagliato qualcosa di troppo, purtroppo succede quando si lavora, mannaggia. -- Blackcat (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noblesse du Royaume d'Italie (1805-1814)

Bonjour, j'espere que tu vas bien, j'ai essayé de te contacter sur ta page française sans y parvenir il y a quelques mois pour une question posée par notre ami Spedonna mais c'est pas grave.

J'ai une petite question à te poser :

Dans l'heradique Napoléonien et particulièrement pour le Royaume d'Italie, notre ami Jimmy 44, nous indique que pour les princes du Royaume il y en a que Deux :

- Eugène de Beauharnais (Vice-Roi) et prince de Venise,

- Joséphine Maximilienne Eugénie Napoléone de Beauharnais (sa fille) Princesse de Bologne (lettre patente du 29 décembre 1807) et Duchesse de Galliera (lettre patente du 28 mai 1813).

Pourrez tu s'il te plait demander a tes amis sur le blog ou si tu pouvais me donner une source pour son blason.

Te remerciant d'avance bonne journée à toi cordialement--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 06:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'espere que tu vas bien, merci pour tes réponses, c'est difficle quelques fois de trouver des sources.

Par contre pour Eugene de Beauharnais je me suis acheté sur ebay un livre de 1954 : Le sang des Bonaparte et il nous donne :

On lui donne parfois d'Empire brisé par l'Ecu de Lombardie sur le tout.

je pense que cela donne ça :

mais penses que l'on puisse lui donner le manteau et lacouronne comme sur le blason du Royaume

Merci encore de ton aide bonne soirée à toi--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Salut, j'espere que tu vas bien j'aurais besoin de ton pour amélioré l'armorial de la maison bonaparte peux tu m'aider s'il te plait (peux tu me contacter sur ma page française s'il te plait dunkerqueenflandre merci d'avance--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are no OTRS member

Hallo GJo, you are no OTRS member → please do not do this! Is there a reason why you have added the OTRS template? Please just reply here. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:19, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Italian operators allow people involved in the ticket's case to add the OTRS templates we give them, also because any check is just a click away. By the way, I don't see you listed as an OTRS volunteer either. So you might want to know that OTRS teams may follow different practices and this does not imply someone is acting wrong. --Elitre (talk) 18:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment Elitre. I am no OTRS volunteer (just a admin). The thing is: it isn't usual on Commons as you can see from the tagging in the file history. And no, the check isn't just a click away for non-otrs members. How else do you want to detect vandalism (false OTRS tags) if not by forbidding OTRS additions by non-OTRS members? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:30, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have a help-desk for that on it.wiki, and such an event is _extremely_ rare. On the other side, also trusted users could misuse tickets by adding them to materials that were not actually donated. In fact, nobody but the ticket sender knows best where the ticket goes :) We have a list of sites who confirmed content donations via OTRS: if we didn't make the list public and if we did not allow everybody to add the permissions template, how could we import thousands of images and texts? Also, I think that vandalism is best spotted by checking a user's history (I don't expect it from long-time users with no priors of copyvio or blocks, you know), and sometimes assuming good faith helps. --Elitre (talk) 06:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation! Special upload projects are a different thing. There it is understandable and the license could often also be proven even without an OTRS ticket (more or less). Also such stuff like {{Sitzendorf permission}} is a exception - it is intended to be added by the uploader. But in other cases (single uploads) I do not think this is a good idea and I had and will revert such tags as soon as I see them. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Modifiche ad una tua opera prima

Ciao, non so se abbiamo mai avuto occasione di incrociarci nei lavori ma se dai un'occhiata a quello che faccio in Commons è principalmente dedicato alla categorizzazione legata alle chiese ed altri edifici religiosi. Sono capitato nella Category:Chiesa di San Giovanni (Saluzzo) e ho fatto un po' di macello estraendo categorie che possono essere consultate tramite altre vie però mi è venuto un probabile dubbio, ovvero che ho sottocategorizzato i capitelli delle colonne come se fossero all'interno della chiesa mentre fanno probabilmente (almeno la luce mi sembra solare) parte del chiostro. Ora ti chiedo una mano anche per categorizzare adeguatamente il chiostro (che non è la chiesa) e che, seppur sono all'inizio, quando trovo strutture complesse (quindi chiese più chiostri annessi) andare alla ricerca del monastero o abbazia o simile che raggruppavano tutto il complesso architettonico quindi scorporare il vari elementi dal contesto. Concludo: potresti dare un'occhiata a quanto ho fatto e spostare e/o integrare adeguatamente? Sempre a disposizione per coordinamenti aspetto tue news :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 11:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Magna Grecia 280aC.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Magna Grecia 280aC.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 09:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Italian somaliland COA.svg

File:Italian somaliland COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— billinghurst sDrewth 05:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted! I did not check the regimental coats of arms of the Italian Army for some years and so it escaped me that the coat of arms of the 32° (Alpini) Engineer Regiment was indeed changed! The one you uploaded at File:CoA mil ITA rgt genio 32.png is indeed the correct one and the old one [5] is not anymore in use. Thanks for the good work! :-) Noclador (talk) 01:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stemma provincia di Napoli

Ciao. Non discuto sul fatto che lo stemma recentemente caricato da Delehaye fosse un copyviol, ma è certo che quello ripristinato da Esby è uno stemma molto creativo e anche simpatico, ma poco rispondente alla realtà. Per ora, non avendo più quello di Delehaye, ho inserito nell'armoriale delle province italiane il file Logo provincia di Napoli.jpg che almeno è corretto, anche se probabilmente non pubblicabile su Commons. --Massimop (talk) 21:49, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Effettivamente mi pare strano che Delehaye abbia utilizzato su Commons il disegno reso disponibile da Araldica Civica su it:wiki (che quindi, per quanto sapevo io, non dovrebbe essere totalmente a licenza libera). Se mi confermi che non è utilizzabile su Commons allora forse è opportuno farlo presente a Delehaye e caricare la sua versione solo su it:wiki, come già fatto per lo stemma vero e proprio. Ciao --Massimop (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Dovremmo forse cominciare a pensare di fare una nostra serie di stemmi civici per averli corretti e a licenza libera ? --Massimop (talk) 12:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ora scrivo a Delehaye per fargli presente che il nuovo disegno non va bene su Commons e, così com'è, non va bene nemmeno su it:wiki. Per quanto riguarda gli stemmi liberi non ci sono, né possono esserci, problemi per quanto riguarda disegni ricompilati (ovviamente non semplicemente copiati dagli originali civici) che siano stati dedotti dalle blasonature. Ne' possono esserci problemi per quanto riguarda l'uso degli ornamento esteriori, che sono imposti dalla legge. Io, un po' alla volta, posso mettermi a comporre stemmi civici, ma ho due problemi: il disegno preliminare degli ornamenti (se qualcuno ce l'ha posso poi introdurlo nei disegni) e, soprattutto, la conversione in SVG, perché io posso produrre disegni solo in BMP e in JPG, al massimo GIF, ma non ho ancora imparato a fare la conversione in SVG (ho GIMP ma non lo so utilizzare), per cui mi servirebbe assistenza. Ciao --Massimop (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Araldica civica

Nessun problema :) --Tenam2 (talk) 08:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cimitero monumentale di Torino

Ho visto che nel 2012 hai caricato foto sul cimitero monumentale di Torino, ne avresti una più significativa (entrata, archi, vista generale) per illustrare l'articolo su wikipedia? Cordialmente Adri08 (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie...fammi sapere se trovi qualcosa. Saluti--Adri08 (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non ti scordar di me....canzone ben conosciuta--Ciao-Adri08 (talk) 15:36, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per le bellissime foto...et buona continuazione su wiki. Ciao -- Adriano--Adri08 (talk) 06:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stemmi province

Hai visto la nuova serie di proposte di cancellazione sugli stemmi caricata da Dapa19 ? Che accade ? Ciao --Massimop (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pensi che Araldica Civica avrebbe grosse obiezioni a che noi si saccheggi (per così dire) i loro disegni per ricomporne altri di nostra produzione in cui citare loro come fonte ma con la licenza giusta per Commons ? In fondo si tratterebbe di circa 100 stemmi (tra l'altro di breve vita futura, sembra ...). --Massimop (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pensavo proprio a cose del genere che hai detto tu. Mi riferivo al fatto di saccheggiare Araldica Civica nel senso che si potrebbero utilizzare i disegni base fatti da loro, ovviamente semplificati nel colore, senza tridimensionalità e con ornamenti esteriori meno raffinati di quelli .svg, ma comunque accettabili araldicamente. Circa la vita futura, mi riferivo ovviamente a quella attiva non a quella storica. Ciao --Massimop (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Se è esclusa la possibilità di opere derivate, allora cade la mia proposta. Io non sono assolutamente in grado di realizzare nuovi disegni accettabili: nell'araldica civica italiana purtroppo le composizioni quasi esclusivamente geometriche sono veramente poche. Pazienza. --Massimop (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Purtroppo non conosco nessuno dei disegnatori di wikipedia. Belli, invece, gli stemmi che hai fatto tu. A cosa ti servono gli stemmi con gli ornamenti fino al 1905 ? Vedendo le immagini che avevi messo come riferimenti, mi è venuto un dubbio: per caso quegli strani pendenti di ghirlande che si trovano con tanta frequenza risalgono a quell'epoca ? Ciao --Massimop (talk) 22:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non credo sia corretto continuare a utilizzare le corone del 1905 solo perché la concessione è stata fatta in precedenza. La attuale normativa, che prevede la corona con le palme, si applica comunque a tutti, a prescindere dalla data di prima concessione, esattamente come, nel caso degli stemmi dell'Esercito, tutte le unità hanno adottato la corona in sostituzione dl precedente elmo romano, indipendentemente dalla data di concessione dello stemma che è di norma rimasto invariato nello scudo. Concordo sulla pesantezza delle ghirlande che, con la stessa logica, dovrebbero essere abolite da tutti gli stemmi. PS: puoi dare un'occhiata alle annotazioni messe ultimamente da un utente sulla voce stemma (con riferimento anche agli stemmi comunali) ? Mi piacerebbe un tuo parere. Ciao --Massimop (talk) 05:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per la voce stemma mi attengo al tuo parere (tra l'altro quella espressa era solo una mia opinione, sia pure desunta da altre fonti). Per le province invece ho ancora qualche dubbio: quando noi ridisegniamo uno stemma non facciamo una ricerca originale ma componiamo una immagine secondo le regole al momento vigenti, come accade per gli stemmi delle famiglie, ecclesiastici e militari. Il fatto che un comune o una provincia, come purtroppo talora accade, usino un disegno scorretto non dovrebbe influenzare la nostra rielaborazione. Se si dovesse applicare lo stesso criterio agli stemmi familiari ci metteremmo a ridere sul serio, viste le aberranti creazioni di molti disegnatori (forse su indicazione dei committenti). A proposito di stemmi ecclesiastici, hai un parere circa la forma di scudo da impiegare (vedi sulla discussione del progetto) ? Ciao --Massimop (talk) 10:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Ciao. --Massimop (talk) 19:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Servizio ferroviario suburbano Cagliari.svg

File:Servizio ferroviario suburbano Cagliari.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Servizio ferroviario suburbano Cagliari.svg

File:Servizio ferroviario suburbano Cagliari.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 09:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SFM di Cagliari

Ciao, il file era stato mantenuto perché ancora in uso in una vecchia pagina di servizio. Ho provveduto ad eliminarlo da quella pagina, e così adesso potrebbe essere cancellato.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 18:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging copyvios

Hi,

Please inform the uploader. See Commons:Guidelines for tagging copyright violations‎. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 12:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Asti sigillo.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Asti sigillo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Asti sigillo.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:56, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Valvasone-Stemma.svg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Valvasone-Stemma.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gonfalone

Per cortesia, evita di rimettere il gonfalone nella categoria riservata alle bandiere. C'è la categoria apposita dove metterlo. Confido nella tua collaborazione, grazie. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:"15 - ITALY - New Logo Alfa Romeo on rear trunk of Alfa Romeo Giulia 2015.jpg

Why this file was nominated for deletion? in same manner we should deleted most of pictures in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Logos_of_automobiles , there are many pictures with copyrighted logos, its not any reason to delete if photo of logo is new. And secondly the photo rights were given to wikimedia. We are free to take photographs. I dont understand people who wants to delete everything they just ruins this wikipedia. --Typ932 (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mercia flag and arms

I was wondering what your source was for the colours of the St. Albans cross? http://www.flaginstitute.org/wp/event/st-albans-day/ and https://britishcountyflags.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/insert-image-9-tam-castle-2.jpg?w=640 and http://www.stalbans.gov.uk/sitetools/app-error.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/default.aspx would suggest a less 'Swedish' hue. Would you be able to change it please unless you have better sources for the colours you have used. Thanks. Cdh1984 (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piacenza-Stemma.png

File:Piacenza-Stemma.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Matthew hk (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Comune di Tivoli

Ciao, scusa non conosco per nulla come si inseriscono contenuti su wikipedia e sicuro ho sbagliato attribuzione di copyright. Lavoro nel Comune di Tivoli e spesso viene usato il logo che si trova su wikipedia nei volantini o nei manifesti, ma quel logo è vecchio. Quello inserito da me è quello giusto, lo trovi anche sul sito del comune nella sezione informazione e stampa, anche in vettoriale. Puoi cambiarlo per favore nella tua pagina? Grazie per l'attenzione e buona giornata — Preceding unsigned comment added by Massimiliano Paolacci (talk • contribs) 15:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stemma Tivoli

Grazie per la sostituzione e per il suggerimento della lettera. Buona giornata — Preceding unsigned comment added by Massimiliano Paolacci (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

St Augustine logo

Can you change the St. Augustine logo (look at the talk page) CubanoBoi (talk) 00:59, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altamura-Stemma.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altamura-Stemma.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 10:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Catanzaro - Gonfalone comunale particolare stemma.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Catanzaro - Gonfalone comunale particolare stemma.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Catanzaro - Gonfalone comunale particolare stemma.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Saluzzo - Gonfalone01.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Saluzzo - Gonfalone01.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Arrow303 (talk) 10:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Saluzzo - Gonfalone02.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Saluzzo - Gonfalone02.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Arrow303 (talk) 10:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:GJo

Maratea infreschidamaratea.jpg

Cittanova

Romanian comma diacritic

Image:OCR-A sample.svg and Image:OCR-B sample.svg

TUSC token 1737fbe5dd51dbc6032f74cda44e9e90

Genova

Font template

Deprecated License

Tip: Categorizing images

blason des villes sous Napoléon

Stemma_Principe_Eugenio

Corona en CoA Città di Ferrara.svg

TUSC token 11969b6a867b2021e62effa255c14c8b

Comune di Ferrara

Arms of Joseph Bonaparte

Re: Insurrezione di Palermo o Presa?

Monumento a Garibaldi

Noblesse du Royaume d'Italie (1805-1814)

Help

You are no OTRS member

Modifiche ad una tua opera prima

File tagging File:Magna Grecia 280aC.jpg

Stemma provincia di Napoli

Araldica civica

Cimitero monumentale di Torino

Stemmi province

SFM di Cagliari

Tagging copyvios

File source is not properly indicated: File:Asti sigillo.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Valvasone-Stemma.svg

Gonfalone

File:"15 - ITALY - New Logo Alfa Romeo on rear trunk of Alfa Romeo Giulia 2015.jpg

Mercia flag and arms

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016

Logo Comune di Tivoli

Stemma Tivoli

St Augustine logo

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altamura-Stemma.png

File tagging File:Catanzaro - Gonfalone comunale particolare stemma.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Saluzzo - Gonfalone01.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Saluzzo - Gonfalone02.jpg

Navigation menu

Search