User talk:De728631/2013

Archives 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Hotcat issue

Hi, you recently added a lot of photos uploaded by me to Category:De Havilland Mosquito which appear incorrect. For example 1. You may want to double check what happened, possibly because you based it on a search for 'mosquito', and think about reverting. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Could you give me some examples of incorrect files? I was working with the official description that always involved "Mosquito". And I did categorise images where Mosquitos were involved in air victories, and photos of ground crews working with Mosquito equipment. So I didn't think there was anything wrong with it. De728631 (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

I must have missed that tent image you mentioned above but I thought I had checked the files I was going to tag. De728631 (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Well, here's another and another that jumped out. I haven't checked through the others. I suspect you need to choose a less ambiguous search. Keep up the good work though, with 12,000+ images uploaded from the IWM, there's plenty that can be done. --Fæ (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Yep, those slipped by as well. I've only just discovered the Cat-a-lot tool so I need to check the search results more thoroughly. De728631 (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

I suggest experimenting with VisualFileChange too. It's quite powerful for complex and multiple field searches. --Fæ (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

IWM Duplicates

Hi, I noticed the duplicates you have been marking. As the upload did a checksum comparison before upload, none of the near duplicates can be identical files. Most seem to have been 'touched up' in some way before upload so they are deviating from the IWM file. There are some problems with potentially deleting these as duplicates, rather than marking them as the originals and the others as derived works, such as a second upload run would re-upload the deleted file (as it does not exist on Commons) and that by deleting the original and leaving a derived work, we may loose something of the quality of the original scan. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I was just wondering about File:Hotspur glider.jpg which you obviously didn't upload once more. I'm going to have a look at the files I've tagged so far to check if they're really identical with the previous upload. De728631 (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

On the other hand there are those cases where your new upload was clearly superior in terms of resolution, e.g. File:Royal Navy Submarines in Holy Loch, Scotland, 1942 TR612.jpg vs File:HMS Sea Dog.jpg. I think we can let the old, smaller versions of such files go. De728631 (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Cool. I suspect that the IWM versions will be the better, or at least more authentic, originals, however there just might be some around where the IWM's 800px wide released versions might be inferior, though this could probably only happen if someone had paid for the original full size digital scan and then released it themselves somewhere. We would need to be careful about sourcing such images, should we ever find one as we would not want to unfairly accuse someone of breaking the IWM terms and conditions. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I've gone through Category:Duplicate and have converted the relevant files to "other versions". And now for some dinner. :) Cheers, De728631 (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Educator 64

Hallo De728631; mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass du Fotos, die den Commodore Educator 64 zeigen, aus der übergeordneten Kategorie nach Category:Commodore 4000 series verschoben hast. Nun ist der Educator 64 ja nicht wirklich Bestandteil der PET-4000-Serie... er hat zwar ein Gehäuse im PET/CBM-Stil, enthält aber einen C64. Er soll zwar auch als Modell "4064" (und als "PET 64") verkauft worden sein, aber das macht ihn m.E. nicht wirklich zum Bestandteil der "echten" 4000er-Serie mit den Modellen 4016 und 4032. Mein Vorschlag wäre daher, nun eine eigene Kategorie "Commodore Educator 64" anzulegen. Diese könnte man dann als Subkategorie von Category:Commodore 64 einordnen - und eventuell, wegen der alternativen Modellbezeichnung, meinetwegen auch weiterhin unter Category:Commodore 4000 series... was meinst du dazu? Gestumblindi (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Ja, das scheint mir eine gute Lösung zu sein. Das Innenleben des Educator basiert ja tatsächlich auf der 64er-Technologie, aber die 4000er Bezeichnung, nämlich 4064, beruht angeblich auf dem Aufbau des Speichers: 64 kB in 40 Spalten, also hat das schon Methode. Ich werde mal eine eigene Kategorie für den Educator anlegen, die dann als Subkategorie sowohl bei C64 als auch bei den 4000ern eingeordnet wird. De728631 (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Super, danke. Ich habe der Kategorie gerade noch eine Beschreibung verpasst :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Sehr schön. :) De728631 (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

De Cecco pasta

Hi. I wasn't sure when I uploaded it. What do you suggest we upload for the De Cecco wikipedia page? Would their pasta on a white plate, without the label, work better? Or will we just need to wait for someone to take a picture of their headquarters in Italy? Please reply on my page. Thanks.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

But they sell internationally. Would simply changing the licence here make a difference?Zigzig20s (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Also, how would I change the licence? Do I need to delete this file and upload it again?Zigzig20s (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel im Bahnhof von Kronstadt 1.jpeg

Hallo, De728631,

danke für deinen Löschantrag zu Gedenktafel im Bahnhof von Kronstadt 1; er ist nicht nur völlig korrekt, weil ich übersehen hatte, dass die Tafel ein Kunstwerk darstellt, sondern spart mir auch noch eine Namensänderung; ich hatte nämlich übersehen, dass ich die Aufnahme nicht bei meiner Ankunft in Kronstadt, sondern bei der Abfahrt in Fogarasch gemacht hatte.

Vielleicht kannst du mir sagen, ob ein modifiziertes Bild ohne Flügelrad (oben) und verzierte Ecken, also nur mit Text, nach rumänischem Recht als normales Schild durchgeht oder ob das einfach nur ein "abgeleitetes Werk" wäre?

Du kannst gerne hier antworten, ich werde von Zeit zu Zeit nachsehen. "Keine Antwort" werte ich als "Nein", ist auch in Ordnung.

Grüße, Aisano (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, so genau kann ich das auch nicht sagen. Aber das Flügelrad als Logo der Eisenbahn ist hier meiner Meinung nach gar nicht mal das Problem, sondern die Tatsache, dass die ganze Tafel wohl von einem Steinmetzen hergestellt wurde. Das Gravieren, Polieren, Lackieren, usw. verleiht dem Ding wahrscheinlich eine ausreichende schöpferische Höhe, um auch den Textteil zu schützen. De728631 (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Re:Daniel Ramirez zoo images from Flickr

Ciao De728631. I'm not an experienced about zoology but I agree with you. I just have taken a look about and in my opinion that's not a kudu. I agree with rename. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 15:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Danke

Wollte eben die Lizenz nachtragen! :) MfG --Aktuarius (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. De728631 (talk) 23:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Dafür war dieser Upload gedacht. :) --Aktuarius (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Alles klar. Komisch, dass der gute Mann noch nicht bei enwiki behandelt wird. Wer bei Christie's unter den Hammer kommt, sollte eigentlich einigermaßen bekannt sein. De728631 (talk) 23:49, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Engwiki ist nicht das Maß aller Dinge. Manchmal ist Deutschwiki eben schneller. Und wer auf Katzenmalerei steht (ich zwar eher nicht, ich wurde durch den Artikel de:Wilhelm Schwar inspiriert), schreibt anscheinend nicht gerne in Wikipedia. :) --Aktuarius (talk) 23:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Nee, das Maß der Dinge sind sie nicht, aber ich hätte gedacht, daß obskure amerikanische Tiermaler dort eher zu finden sind. Mal sehen, vielleicht stelle ich da demnächst mal nen stub rein. De728631 (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Nachdem ich deine Benutzerseite in Deutschwiki gesehen habe: wären dein Metier nicht eher obskure amerikanische Fischmaler? Gruß aus dem Süden nach S-H! Mach:) --Aktuarius (talk) 00:06, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

LOL :) Gruß zurück vom Fischkopp. De728631 (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

So, ich such jetzt mal ein paar seiner Bilder zusammen und klau mir die für Commons. :) --Aktuarius (talk) 00:13, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Und wenn ich was hasse, dann sind es solche beschissenen Schriftzüge auf Bildern. *ka oo te zet*! --Aktuarius (talk) 00:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Ja, die sind richtig nervig. Guckst du hier und hier. De728631 (talk)

A kitten for you!

Und jetzt her mit dem Stub! :D

Aktuarius (talk) 00:25, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Das mache ich morgen, wenn ich besser denken kann. :) De728631 (talk) 00:27, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Genehmigt! :) --Aktuarius (talk) 00:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Train categorisation

Hi mate. You beat me to the punch with my Kidderminster uploads. For your future reference, you can easily categorise British mainline trains using the ukt template. Use like {{subst:ukt|150|101|London Midland|Centro revised|Birmingham to Worcester via Kidderminster Line}} to categorise 150101 of London Midland, in Centro revised livery, on the B-W via Kidderminster Line. Each train should in principle be categorised by operator, line and livery. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

That's cool. Now we only need a way to integrate this into Hotcat. ;) De728631 (talk) 21:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and if you add an extra term, it adds "train interior" cats. Add 1 for 1st, x for cab, anything else standard. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ximena duque Premios billboard 2013.jpg

Thanks for mentioning this Copyvio

--Neozoon (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Kein Problem. De728631 (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Wappen Wiesenbach (Baden).svg

Hi, thanks for making me aware of the complicated copyright situation of coats of arms. Unfortunately I'm not sure whether I understood it correctly, so I'd be glad if you could tell me if I unterstood it right:

If a file like e.g. Wappen Altwiesloch.png includes {{coat of arms}} and I then redraw the coat of arms and upload it as a SVG file, this would be a copyright violation, since there has been no artistic creativity?

Obviously this doesn't require much creativity. It is just the conversion task. For this reason I put on the SVG files I uploaded:"|source=based on File:Wappen Wiesenbach Baden.png" and "|author=rebuilt as SVG file by Denes Translations" This way I clarify that this is no derrivative work, but just a PNG converted into SVG.

Is that the wrong way to proceed? How do I do it correctly?

Thanks for your advice.

Hi, vielen Dank für den Hinweis zur Urheberrechtslage bezüglich Wappen in Wikimedia Commons. Leider bin ich mir nicht ganz sicher, ob ich das Ganze richtig verstanden habe, weshalb ich mich freuen würde, wenn du/Sie mir sagen könntest/könnten, ob ich das richtig verstanden habe:

Wenn bei einer Datei der oben genannte Zusatz "Convert to SVG", also "Dieses Wappen sollte als SVG Vektorgrafik nachgebaut werden. Dies hat viele Vorteile, sehen Sie hierzu Commons: ..." steht und ich diese Grafik als Vektorgrafik nachbaue und hochlade, dann handelt es sich dabei um eine Urheberrechtsverletzung, weil dies keine künstlerische Kreativität verlangt?

Sicherlich ist da nicht viel Kreativität, weswegen ich stets dazuschreibe, dass das von mir erstellte SVG auf dem angegebenen PNG / GIF, ... basiert. Meine Idee dahinter ist klarzustellen, dass es sich nur um eine Abzeichnung handelt und um kein anderes Werk. Aus diesem Grund habe ich als Lizenz auch nur {{PD-Coa-Germany}} angegeben.

Ist diese Vorgehensweise falsch? Wie gehe ich richtig vor?

Vielen Dank für die Klärung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, best regards, Denes Translations (talk) 21:07 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Das Urheberrecht bei Wappen ist so eine Sache. Obwohl die Beschreibung (Blasonierung) im allgemeinen gemeinfrei ist, hängt die tatsächliche Gestaltung immer vom Künstler ab. Meiner Meinung nach ist der Baustein {{PD-Coa-Germany}} daher grundsätzlich fraglich, aber es hat wohl bisher keinen gestört. Daher würde ich immer die Lizenz der ursprünglichen Bitmap-Datei nehmen. Bei File:Coat of Arms of Moscow.svg ist auch auch wieder eine gemeinfrei Lizenz verwendet worden, da das Original scheinbar nicht geschützt ist.

Ein anderer Fall tritt dann auf, wenn du SVG-Elemente aus vorhandenen Dateien nimmst, und in dein Produkt einbaust. Sind diese Quelldateien unfrei, dann muss die entsprechende Lizenz, z. B. Creative Commons, weitergegeben werden. Generell sollte man dabei auch immer die Quelldateien angeben. De728631 (talk) 22:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Aircraft at Uetersen Airport

Moin!

Könnte man das noch weiter unterteilen, so wie Category:Cessna at Uetersen Airport, Category:Piper at Uetersen Airport usw.? Huhu Uet 19:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Man du legst aber ein Tempo vor. Ich warte noch ein bisschen ab mit dem hochladen neuer Bilder. Nun noch mal ne Frage: Wie bekomme ich Verschieberechte bzw. weitere Benutzerrechte? Mit unter schleichen sich kleine Schreibfehler in der Bildbeschreibung ein und ich muß immer Bausteine setzen oder andere Administratoren fragen ob sie das Bild umbenennen. Huhu Uet 20:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Da ich Deine Frage hier gerade zufällig sehe: Du kannst unter Commons:RFR#Filemover die Rechte beantragen. Vorher bitte aber Commons:Dateien_verschieben lesen. --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, das wusste ich auch noch nicht. Vielen Dank für die Info! De728631 (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Murals

Hi there, I am currently uploading a Flickr stream, and there are a few murals in amongst them. I will be going through and cleaning the uploads up, so to save you the hassle of filing DRs, you can feel free to leave them as is for the time being, and within a couple of days, they will all be sorted, and I will deal with all of them in bulk. Cheers,russavia (talk) 15:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

No problem. De728631 (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Starbeck

Don;t bother categorising, I'll get to it in a few hours. Unless you can categorise the flowers, in which case please do. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I think I'll leave that to the botanists. ;) On another note, the ukt template does a great job but surely need to know about something about lines and liveries before adding it. It might be easier to make all those parameters optional. De728631 (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

If people can't do it all I'd rather they just leave it in the parent category, that way it doesn't get 1/3 categorised, which requires catscan etc to find and fix. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

For watching for copyvios on Commons! Palosirkka (talk) 20:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. De728631 (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Infraction aux droits d'auteur

Bonjour. Ce dont vous me parlez concerne les reproductions d'articles de presse ? Cordialement. / Hello. What you speak to me concern the reproductions of press articles? Cordially. --Noelbabar (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Excusez moi, je ne connaissais pas les règles. J'arrête immédiatement. / Excuse I, I did not know rules(rulers). I stop(arrest) immediately. --Noelbabar (talk) 15:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Wappen der Freiherren Pranckh zu Pux

Hallo. Die Familie stammt ursprünglich aus der Steiermark, dementsprechend leitet sich die bayrische Linie aus der steirischen ab. Das hochgeladene Wappen mit den 4 Feldern ist das freiherrliche Wappen der Pranckhher zu Pux, welches 1298 durch die Vermählung zwischen Friedrich von der Pranckh mit der Erbtochter Anna von Pux entstand. Das Wappen mit den 2 Zinnen ist das ältere Stammwappen. Neben dem einfachen Stammwappen und dem Wappen der Pranckhher zu Pux bestehen auch noch jene der gräflichen Linie bei Tyroff und Siebmacher.

Pictures

Hello, I would like to keep the picture of the Polar Bears on here because I would like pictures of them. Fudge3400 (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Actually we can't keep images that have not been published under a free license by the original artist/photographer. But we have a whole category of images about polar bears, see Category:Ursus maritimus, or especially Category:Ursus maritimus (juvenile). De728631 (talk) 17:53, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Files from O Roxo Flickr stream

Thank you very much for your help on categoryzising those files uploaded from Flickr. Cheers --Dura-Ace (talk) 19:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. :-) De728631 (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

CUX 20 or CUX 28

Bianca Cuxhaven

Using www.fao.org, www.shipdata.nl, kotterspotter.jouwweb.nl, kotterfoto.nl or www.worldfishingtoday.com, I cannot find a CUX 28. Is it possibly an old version of the license? By the way, you are doing a great job, correcting wrong information. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Moin De728631 und Stunteltje,

Ihr macht beide einen tollen Job und ich bedanke mich sehr bei Euch, ich kann Euch nicht sagen ob es 20 oder 28 ist, ich habe noch mal ein Bild gefunden und auf der Seite steht Bianca Cuxhaven. Ich habe versucht es über die Datenbank heraus zu finden, bin aber nicht weiter gekommen. ;(

Tschüß und Danke noch mal, ich bin in der Woche nur mit UMTS unterwegs und bin froh wenn ich am Wochenende mal ein Netz habe um Bilder hochzuladen. Tschüß Euer -- Ra Boe watt?? 08:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Moin ihr beiden, und vielen Dank, Ra Boe, für das neue Bild. Es gibt noch eine NC312 Bianca [1], aber das ist wieder ein anderes Schiff. Die Nummer CUX-28 habe ich auch nicht finden können, also vermute ich, dass das eine ziemlich neue Registrierung ist. So wie es aussieht, wurde die Nummer CUX20 am 1.11.2010 an das Schiff Wiking vergeben (siehe FAO), aber Ra Boes Fotos sind aus 2011. Also ist dieses blaue Schiff wohl doch nicht die "20". De728631 (talk) 10:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Es ist CUX-26: http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1445679 :) De728631 (talk) 10:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Siehe auch Category:CUX-26 Bianca (ship, 1957)... De728631 (talk) 10:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Swedish Collar

hello excuse me disturb you, I saw you make beautiful coat of arms, could you make two collar for the arms of Sweden please.

The order of the sword :, colors :http://www.arnell.cc/bilder/kmstkso.jpg

Order of Vasa :, colors :

http://www.arnell.cc/bilder/kmstkvo.jpg

Thank you in advance for your help good day cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Salut, Dunkerqueenflandre. I'm afraid to tell you that I'm very bad at creating new graphic elements from scratch. The coats of arms I've been making recently were all based on existing elements that I just needed to modify. But I'm going to ask Lokal Profi who created File:Serafimerordens kedja.svg. Maybe he can help. De728631 (talk) 17:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Album covers

Hi, I wanted to add the cover for "Big TV", White Lies' album. This is the first image I have ever added to Wiki Commons and as you can see it didn't go very well. I wanted to add similar copyright etc. information as there is for the cover of their previous album (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Whiteliesritualcover.png) and upload it in smaller resolution, but I guess simple copy/paste didn't work. It would really help if you refered me to some page with information on adding album covers and necessary tags. I would also be happy to delete that file myself, but I don't know how... Mayast (talk)

Album covers are almost always copyrighted and are not released under a free license, so we can't upload them here. Several Wikipedias, however, have the option of hosting such images with a fair use rationale. E.g. at the English Wikipedia, you can upload a low-resolution file by going to Wikipedia:Upload/Non-free album cover. That's a guided process to help you with uploading non-free album covers. You should also read Wikipedia:Non-free content to get an idea of the general concept. Please feel free to ask me at my Wikipedia talk page if you need help over there. De728631 (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I will check that out :) Mayast

little changement

Hello, I hope you're okay, you told me the last you could do little things is what you could do this please.

This shield is not completely finished could you make the dividing line between the eagle and the bridge please do and you could do the banner above the crest.

On the coat of arms there is also a banner with the words FOLKETS KÄRLEK MIN BELONING (words is gold)

THANK YOU in advance for your help good day to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I've added a division line at File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède.svg, but I'm not sure if the motto banners should actually be included. Because in the end that depends on the original blason. Do you have a text with the original description? I've looked into the Armorial Rietstap but couldn't find the arms of Carl XIV John. De728631 (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

re hello, the separation bar is not displayed in the arms 1

description comes from a book called Dynastien Bernadottes vapen och det svenska riksvapnet Arvid Berghman and the model is taken from the book and the model is in a church in Stockholm or are buried all the [[kings and queens.

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

You need to clear your browser cache to see the new seperation in the thumbnails at File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède.svg. If you click on the image to see the full scale resolution then you'll see that the new version has actually been uploaded. And I'm going to add the motto too. De728631 (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I've added two new files, File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel.svg and File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel.png, but I'm experiencing problems with the SVG version. So I've asked Spedona for help. Btw, why didn't you ask them to update their file? De728631 (talk) 15:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The inscription problem has been solved. De728631 (talk) 16:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

re, I did not ask him because he was very busy the last few days.

Can I please ask you why you do the banner had not white as in the example

Thank you again cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I didn't make a white banner because I think the contrast between the banner and the letters is better this way. Also, the example you showed is just one artist's rendition of the arms, as is mine. Unless the blason explicitely calls for a white banner, we can use any reasonable colour. De728631 (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

ok, thank you cordialy--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Armorial de la Maison Bernadotte

Bonjour, j'aimerais savoir savoir si vous pourriez m'accorder encore un peu de temps pour l'armorial s'il vous plait.

Merci d'avance pour votre aide bonne journée

Cordialement--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour, Dunkerqueenflandre. I'm sorry, but I don't speak French — I guess though that you'd like me to work on the arms of House Bonaparte? De728631 (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I was wrong I sorry this is not the Bonaparte family but Bernadotte family.

yes please do I have a book on seals and coats of arms of Sweden could you please give me the image of the Queen Desideria File:Blason Reine Désideria de Suède.JPG

It is cut suede and Norway

with royal crown and collar a little different, the cross is a cross patriacale. File:Heraldic Royal Crown of Sweden.svg

thank you in advance for your help good evening cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Alright, let me see what I can do. But File:Blason Reine Désideria de Suède.JPG is way too small. I can't recognize anything there. Maybe I can find a blazon or another depicting of the queen's arms. De728631 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Here is a Swedish heraldic wiki of sorts that attributes a completely different coat of arms to Desideria. It seems that they show the personal arms of Désirée Clary before she became queen of Sweden. De728631 (talk) 21:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

hello picture you show me is not correct it is the the Clary family in France

the coat of arms that I have given you just a book called Dynastien Bernadottes vapen och det svenska riksvapnet Arvid Berghman edited in 1944 No. 492 875 260

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 07:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, I'm sorry but I don't have access to that book, and without a better image or at least a full heraldic description I can't produce any coat of arms. On that note, the image you uploaded from that book is probably still copyrighted, so you cannot republish it here. De728631 (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

hello, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Sweden-photo

good day--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

hello, if you want the photo you could put source, because I have not needed me what interests me is to have the coat of arms in svg for armorial.

Thank you for your help, good day

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT: with "I"

Found a number of ships sorted with an extra "I" in front of the name at Category:Ships built in the United Kingdom. Special reason? --Stunteltje (talk) 07:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Oops, that must've come from my c&p template text that reads "Impulsive (ship,...). Going to fix that. De728631 (talk) 17:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Blason famille fr Benoist de Gentissart.svg

Bonsoir, Chandres. This file was uploaded from the French Wikipedia in 2010, but from the beginning it had two conflicting licenses. Could you please check the original file history at Wikipedia? Thank you. De728631 (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I check the history of the file on fr.wP, and I found no trace of CC-BY-SA or GFDL, only the last edit before moving to Commons was the adding of {{PD-self}} by user:Jmh2o cheers --Chandres (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Merci bien! Then I'm going to remove the GFDL / CC licenses. De728631 (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

no license tagging

Hi, thx for your help in Category:Coats of arms images without a license: needs history check. But could you pls. add {{subst:nld}} instead of (I guess) {{subst:no license}}, which resulting unnssary code and an incorrect date of when the images were tagged. Altrnativly you can activate the "quick delete" gadget within your preferences. Then the uploaders will be informed automacticly. thx. --JuTa 19:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

"Quick delete" sounds like a quick solution. I'm going to try that. De728631 (talk) 19:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Escudo de Artajona ?

Bonsoir. Je n'ai aucune idée de ce fichier (je ne l'ai pas dessiné) et le découvre ici. Adressez-vous à l'auteur (SanchoPansaXXI). Merci Etxeko (talk) 00:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I don't speak French. But the message about a missing license went to both SanchoPansaXXI and Miguillen. De728631 (talk) 12:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

delete request

hello, could do the necessary to ensure that the image of the coat of arms of Queen Desire is no longer "delete request"

thank you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

I can't do a lot about it. It will be closed by an administrator. De728631 (talk) 12:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

File:ESCUDO SAN JUAN DE LA RAMBLA.svg

Why was that considered to be a copyright violation? Of course, now I have no way of knowing what the asserted claim was... AnonMoos (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

It's good that things are OK again, but considering that the problem was more one of annoying inattentiveness to details than flagrant brazen copyright violation, you could just as well have used {{Nld}} as {{Speedy}}... AnonMoos (talk) 23:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Nordic Council.svg

Can you please explain why do think that this image violates some copyright? The page you referred to ("Guidelines for the use of the Nordic logo"), first, is about the logo and does not mention the flag, second, is called "guidelines" — I do not see how it is related to copyright issues and what legal status it has at all. I was not able to find anything about copyright policy for flags in general either... — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 01:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Logos such as this one are automatically copyrighted to either the designer or the relevant organisation. The flag you uploaded displays said logo, and the guidelines page states explicitely that such a logo must not be used by outsiders. This restriction is not compatible with the requirements for files at Commons. Media at Commons need to be usable by anyone for any purpose. Apart from that, the Nordic Council has not published any of its graphics under a free license, and the file is not yet licensed either. So, even if you only took the logo and put it into a white field to create a flag, that would still be a derivative work of the original logo, and thus a copyright infringement. De728631 (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Notices for lack of license

Thanks for the warning. Those pictures are a series I came up too fast and was due perser license with copy-paste of fond code. If more cases please let me know and I'll solve it, Regards Miguillen (discursión) 14:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

No problem. You might also want to look at Category:Coats of arms images without a license: needs history check for any of your uploads. De728631 (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

About Of The Archaengel Band.jpg image

Greetings, I´m just writting to let you know that I´ve already sent the permission by email as your sugestion. I´m new here and I really can´t find where to send the permission while uploading... Should I do something more now in order to get the image okayed? Thanks in Advance friend.--Anapsro (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel.png

File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel.svg

File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion requests/File:Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel.png

Hi, I just saw your answer, in fact, I'll tell you why I asked the deletion of the file.

I do a lot of research between Nordic Library in Paris and another in Stockholm with sources that I think the fairest possible.

But unfortunately, when I ask something (always with courtesy and politeness incidentally), I always feel that I mind.

So finally, the shield has imperfections, but if I ask to change, nobody will answer my worst ... demand will remain unanswered as the Queen Desideria...(19h24, le 13 Juin 2013 (UTC))

Here I wish you a good evening, cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 18:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Honestly, that is not any reason to delete the file. We all do voluntary work here, and if your requests remain unanswered then that is either because people don't have time to write back or because there are some misunderstandings. Imperfections can be corrected, so instead of seeking deletion, please tell me or anyone else what should be fixed. You might also want to ask the Commons:Graphic Lab for assistance. De728631 (talk) 18:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

here is no misunderstanding between us, I made a request to the workshop "demand" blazon three weeks ago and practically there either I did not answer ...

do not think I'm angry, but I took two weeks off in June to take care of armorial ... I just feel a little disappointed.

I'll report if you do not want to remove the shield,

If you have the time to help me just called me.

good evening to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I can help you with "Blason de Charles XIV Jean de Suède listel" but I have already told you in the section above that I don't know how to draw the arms of Desideria. So, what's wrong with the shield of Charles XIV Jean? De728631 (talk) 19:23, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Good evening and thank you very much first, in fact, there are three things any first crown (he was crown prince), the central shield could you standardize with other shields and finally order (medal) could you put like this

a)

b) the central wholes shields should have the same form and bridge the separation must be gold

c) the order can put as

Thank you very much for your help, you told me you did not draw the image of the queen: the arms or order?

thank you again cordially --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, that very crown you just showed me is already in the current image. And are you sure that the form of the shields has been prescribed anywhere? In heraldry, a coat of arms is not defined by the look of its elements but by the description, the blazon in English or blasonnement in French. So I'm not convinced that we need to change the bridge or the shield. But I can easily move the order downwards, to it doesn't interfer with the crown.

As to Desideria, I didn't draw anything yet, neither the arms nor the order. De728631 (talk) 20:56, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I have now changed the bridge and the division line. De728631 (talk) 22:38, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thank you so much this is perfect thank you again good evening cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Why has File:Caleidra, Miss Me, Official Video, Photo Still, Jan 2013.png has been nominated for deletion?

Hi De728631,

I just checked your reason for nomination for deletion and can see why you suspected it was a fan account. Caleidra has tweeted the image from her official Twitter account to verify that it is an official Flickr account.

Thanks,

Wappenbuch

Danke für die vielen Kategorisierungen. Ich bin gerade dabei, die Angaben aus dem Buch in die Beschreibungen einzufügen. Hochgeladen habe ich erst mal en masse, da das sonst noch viel mehr Arbeit macht. --WolfD59 (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Die Blasonierungen stehen leider nicht im Buch. Aber immerhin Namensträger und Orte, das ist auch schon mal was. Lesen kann ich nicht alles, aber vieles wird schon halbwegs stimmen, was ich da entziffere. Alle Quellenangaben werden später auch noch durch Links zur genauen Seite verlinkt, das macht das Nachprüfen dann einfacher. --WolfD59 (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Bei manchen redenden kam ich nicht gleich drauf, aber z. B. ist bei Hausenthaler der Fisch dann wohl ein "Hausen". Bei anderen hätte man sich ein redendes gewünscht, z. B. bei Schalckhammer oder Ziegenschuech (mit Hirsch!). Das sind ja alles rein heraldisch eh keine Meisterwerke, ist eben eine Verfallszeit und die Wappen sind ja vielleicht von den Hofpfalzgrafen auch absichtlich besonders bürgerlich und nicht-adelig konzipiert worden... Details wie die Schwalbe bei Schweiberer (wohl auch so ein redendes Wappen), deren Schwanz über den Schild hinausreicht, sind natürlich völlig unheraldisch gedacht, aber so etwas gefällt mir doch irgendwie immer, wenn man es wo findet. (Lieblingsbeispiel: Mann und Vogel mit Leine, über eine Schildteilung hinweg hier). Sind das hier eigentlich irgendwelche Schöpfeimer zum Bierbrauen? Kommt auch hier vor, ebenfalls ein Bierbrauer. Und was um Himmels willen ist das hier? Ein Granatapfel? --WolfD59 (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Einen kleinen Blasebalg? Zur Nutzung (als Bierbrauer) wie hier beim Wein: File:Mendel I 094 r.jpg? --WolfD59 (talk) 19:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Aah... dann heißt er wohl Wöckhl, ich glaube da hab ich mich verlesen. --WolfD59 (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Anne Hyde Arms.svg

That's not supposed to be what categories such as Category:Azure a chevron Or are for... AnonMoos (talk) 01:06, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

I do think that category works perfectly well. If you take a closer look, the sinister side of the entire shield is itself quartered with the first element matching the blazon of "Azure a chevron Or". De728631 (talk) 15:10, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

That's nice -- all these "X a Y Z" categories have notices stating "This category is only for representation of coat of arms whose blazon is exactly X a Y Z", but you seem to be unilaterally changing the intended purpose of the categories... AnonMoos (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Not at all. The specific blazons in the notices are still valid for all those arms. "X a Y Z" can occur anywhere in a blazon, not just in the very beginning. De728631 (talk) 20:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

75%

Hi,

I want to talk about this image:

It is mostly used by Wikibooks and indicates a level of completeness. However, I think that the order of the color is not logical:

I think it should be blue. Unfortunately, I don't know where to talk to debate about that. Is it should be discussed on Wikibooks? Commons? Meta? And where? ftiercel (talk) 18:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Since this colour scale is essentially a Wikibooks project, I suggest you start a discussion at Wikibooks:Wikibooks:Reading room/Proposals. According to their description that is where to to talk about suggestions for improving Wikibooks. De728631 (talk) 18:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

OK. ftiercel (talk) 20:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Rot

[2]

Hallo,

bei uns (in Wuppertal, Nordrhein-Westfalen) sind die Fahrzeuge der Feuerwehr inkl. Rettunswagen "rot", nicht organge. --Atamari (talk) 08:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Ja, das ist wohl manchmal sehr subjektiv. Viele solcher Einsatzfahrzeuge sind ja in RAL 2002 Leuchtorange lackiert. Aber RAL 3024 Leuchtrot sieht oft sehr ähnlich aus, je nachdem wie das Licht einfällt. Vielen Dank jedenfalls für den Hinweis, und für Deine Mithilfe beim Kategorisieren. De728631 (talk) 10:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hier steht's sogar ganz offiziell: RAL 3024. Interessanterweise werden mit dieser Regelung gelb-rote Rettungswagen etc. in NRW praktisch ausgeschlossen. In SH geht man ja auch ähnliche Wege mit der offiziellen Farbgebung. De728631 (talk) 10:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Wie schön, dass manches so ausführlich geregelt ist. Ich weis jetzt nicht genau ob die von der Feuerwehr (Category:Firefighting ambulances in Wuppertal) schon immer (Anderung nach Category:Red and white ambulances) Leuchtrot/Weis aus Farbe hatten. Wie man hier sieht, sieht man gelegentlich noch andere Krankenwagen/Retungswagen. Frage gibt es eine eigene Kategorie für Krankentransportwagen, der Gelbe Wagen - ist kein Wagen für Notfälle. p.s. In Category:Firefighting ambulances in Wuppertal sind einige Bilder auch als rot Wagen kategorisiert, sie sollten aber alle rot/weiß sein, wie nun die gesamte Kategorie. --Atamari (talk) 11:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Nein, nach KTW und RTW wird hier nicht unterschieden, das wird alles in "Ambulances" einsortiert. Die Notarztwagen ohne Krankentrage, z. B. auf Geländewagenbasis, lassen sich allerdings ganz gut in Category:Rapid response vehicles in Germany eintüten. De728631 (talk) 12:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

• Ich habe noch die Kat Category:Firefighting command vehicles in Wuppertal angelegt. --Atamari (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

p.s. 4 neue Bilder Ende August hier Category:Ambulances in Wuppertal. --Atamari (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

• Oh, schöne Bilder. Ich mag besonders den gelben KTW. De728631 (talk) 14:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!!

Thank you for the barnstar. I was not aware of them before your gift.

Thanks also for being so understanding about my edits on those RAF squadron roundel files that you created. People are often territorial about files they have created and can be defensive about edits of those files. I greatly appreciate that you are not.

Would you be open to collaborating on some of the squadron roundels for 600, 601, 604, etc.?

Sure. Do you have images of these roundels to build upon? And I really need to check your changes so I can learn how to minimize the code. De728631 (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I just noticed that the 600s roundels already exist, so let me see what I can do to improve them. De728631 (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Call to Arms

Hello,

Please explain why you tagged and deleted File:Mackitosh of Mackitosh arms.svg and MacGregor_of_MacGregor_Arms.svg ? I created these a while back using the Inkscape. I see from your user page that you are familiar with Inkscape and Heraldry. My user page: User:Czar_Brodie has all my creations listed. You can see from these that I use appropriate tags and always link art that is on the commons and was used in the pictures I created. If I have been doing something wrong please inform me. Please also restore my art. Both those images took a great deal of my time and was done per requests on Wikipedia Scottish Clan Pages. Yours sincerely, Czar Brodie (not logged in as I do not trust the server I am on, but I can log in later tonight).

Please see User talk:Czar Brodie. De728631 (talk) 15:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I see that it was not you who removed the images. Did you tag them? If so, did you check the history to see if the "own work" or the cc license was removed by another user? Yours ever, Czar Brodie (talk) 05:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Can't authenticate E-mail.

Hello De728631,

Would you, as an administrator, please check my account and see what is wrong, in that I am unable to authenticate my e-mail function, thereby limiting me. I've asked for authentication codes but I've never gotten one from Commons, even though I get the message that one has been sent.

Thanks, Bassoonstuff

Graf Von Luxburg.jpg

ask under what grounds delete a file that I create and modify, saiendo I own all rights in the same--Von Luxburg (talk) 13:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Please note that I'm not an administrator at Wikimedia Commons, so I can't delete anything here, and as far as I can see, there has never been any such file called File:Graf Von Luxburg.jpg. But if you meant File:Escudo de los Condes de Luxburg.png, I can tell you that was deleted because you copied it from this website. Even if you are affiliated with House Von Luxburg and may be entitled to use the arms, we can't accept media with a copyright that you have not created yourself. Every rendition of a coat of arms is an original work that is copyrighted to an individual artist. So to host this particular image of the Luxburg arms, Commons requires a free licence from the original designer. I'd also like to note that there is already a whole Category:Coats of arms of Luxburg family. De728631 (talk) 00:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

• I apologize but someone delete all the images I uploaded and already had the OTRS permissions granted if you can help me I would appreciate forever--Von Luxburg (talk) 13:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
  • While I can't undelete your images, you may ask INeverCry (talk · contribs). It appears that he has deleted most of your images. If you explain to him that you've sent an email to OTRS, he should be able to verify this and restore the files. De728631 (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)